Abstract
Cells govern their homeostasis through autophagy by sequestering substrates, ranging from proteins to aggregates and organelles, into autophagosomes for lysosomal degradation. In these processes cells need to coordinate between substrate remodeling and autophagosome formation for efficient engulfment. We found that in Parkin-mediated mitophagy, mitochondria to be turned over first become grape-like mitoaggregates, followed by their disassembly into smaller pieces via the actinomyosin system. At the disassembly step, we observed spatially-associated, synchronous formation of circular F-actin and BATS-labeled autophagy initiation sites near mitochondria, suggesting coordination between substrate downsizing and autophagosome formation during mitophagy. Interestingly, PtdIns(4,5)P2, instead of PtdIns(3)P, regulates this mitophagy-associated formation of circular F-actin and BATS-sites. Selective depletion of PtdIns(4,5)P2 near omegasomes, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) subdomains involved in autophagosome formation, impaired mitoaggregate disassembly. Our findings demonstrate the presence of a pool of PtdIns(4,5)P2 adjacent to omegasomes, and that they coordinate mitoaggregate disassembly with autophagy initiation during Parkin-mediated mitophagy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) is an organelle quality control pathway that sequesters damaged mitochondria into autophagosomes for lysosomal removal1,2. Defective mitochondria form clusters of mitochondrial aggregates (hereafter mitoaggregates) and can accumulate at the perinuclear region, a signature phenomenon reported in Parkinson’s disease model systems3. Similar to the generation of protein aggresomes, mitoaggregate formation is considered a protective mechanism that clusters defective materials for the reduction of cellular toxicity. This process is driven by (1) Pink1/Parkin-mediated ubiquitination of damaged mitochondria and subsequent accumulation of the ubiquitin (Ub) receptor p62 (also known as SQSTM1) that help cluster impaired mitochondria4,5, and (2) Trafficking of damaged mitochondria to the perinuclear region6,7. The apparent size mismatch between autophagosomes8 (typically 0.5–1.5 μm in mammalian cells) and mitoaggregates suggests that mitoaggregates will eventually need to be dimensionally remodeled for efficient mitophagy.
A particularly interesting aspect related to mitoaggregate remodeling is its relationship with the autophagy initiation process. Synchronization between mitoaggregate remodeling and mitochondrial targeting by the autophagic machinery can reduce the exposure of free floating dysfunctional mitochondria to the cytoplasm, thereby minimizing cellular stress. It is known that autophagosomes originate from PtdIns(3)P-rich sites on the ER termed omegasomes:9 LC3-PE containing autophagosomal membrane grows from these regions, which in turn sequesters substrates into complete autophagosome. Positioning mitoaggregate remodeling events directly at the omegasomes therefore represents one way to seamlessly integrate Parkin-labeled mitochondrial fragments into the autophagy pathway.
Here, we report that in Parkin-mediated mitophagy the mitoaggregates represent clusters of fragmented and swollen mitochondria. These mitoaggregates require disassembly into smaller pieces for productive Parkin-mediated mitophagy; during this process, circular F-actin and BATS-labeled autophagy initiation structures cooperatively form in proximity. The formation of both structures is controlled by the same upstream activator, a pool of PtdIns(4,5)P2 that resides near the omegasome. Our results reveal the unrecognized role of phosphoinositides (PtdIns) in coordinating mitoaggregate remodeling with autophagy initiation during Parkin-mediated mitophagy.
Results
Mitoaggregate formation and disassembly during mitophagy
Using a photosensitizer10 to selectively mediate the impairment of a fraction of cellular mitochondria (Fig. 1a), we observed that damaged mitochondria underwent mitoaggregate formation and disassembly within a time span of 3 h (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Movie 1): first they clustered into mitoaggregates after Parkin recruitments (40–50 min after damage), followed by their disassembly into smaller fragments (90–100 min after damage). We then utilized FRAP to probe the status of Parkin-labeled mitoaggregates in HeLa cells expressing EBFP2-Parkin, EGFP-dMito (a mito-matrix-targeting EGFP), and KillerRed-dMito (another photosensitizer for mitophagy initiation). Compared to the control where EGFP-dMito can exchange between interconnected mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 1a), EGFP-dMito was unable to freely exchange within mitoaggregates (Fig. 1c, d; white arrow indicates the photobleached region). This demonstrated that the mitoaggregates were not composed of an entangled tubular mitochondrion. Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) revealed that mitoaggregates represent clusters of fragmented and swollen mitochondria (Fig. 1e–g and Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). This indicated that damaged mitochondria underwent mitochondrial fission as well as clustering to form mitoaggregates, followed by their disassembly into smaller fragments for turnover. High electron densities found at the interfaces between individual mitochondrial fragments in the mitoaggregates (Fig. 1 h) support the presence of tethering factors (such as Ub and p62) that help mitoaggregate clustering. In support of this, p62-deficient HeLa cells exhibited defective formation of mitoaggregates (Supplementary Fig. 1d). As shown in Fig. 1g, the dimensions of grape-like mitoaggregates are much larger than those of typical autophagosomes (Fig. 1g; red arrow); thus, the disassembly of mitoaggregates into smaller pieces appears to be necessary for their efficient engulfment into autophagosomes. We therefore sought to determine how cells regulate mitoaggregate disassembly.
Circular F-actin structures during mitoaggregate disassembly
Time-lapse imaging of mitoaggregate disassembly (dynamics of Parkin-labeled mitochondria) revealed that the process included fragmentation as well as long-range dispersion, (Supplementary Fig. 1e). This observation led us to evaluate whether cytoskeleton is involved in mitoaggregate disassembly. Interestingly, we observed F-actin formation (using the yeast-derived F-actin marker LifeAct-EGFP11, Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Movie 2), as opposed to microtubule or intermediate filament generation (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b), near Parkin-labeled mitochondria. Phalloidin staining also confirmed that F-actin structures formed in proximity to the mitoaggregates, both in cells expressing and not expressing LifeAct-EGFP (Supplementary Fig. 2c-e). F-actin structures selectively appeared in the subcellular regions where Parkin-labeled mitoaggregates resided (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3a). The same phenomenon can also be observed in HEK293 cells, a cell line that possesses high levels of endogenous Parkin (Supplementary Fig. 3b). The F-actin structures were not observed in HeLa cells lacking Parkin (Supplementary Fig. 3c), suggesting that F-actin assemblies are spatially coupled to Parkin-mediated mitophagy. The F-actin assemblies observed were transient and circular in dynamics (Fig. 2e, f), and occurred specifically during mitoaggregate disassembly (90–100 min following damage) (Fig. 2d). To better visualize their temporal overlap, we photoimpaired a small number of mitochondria within HeLa cells (Fig. 2g, h). As shown in Fig. 2i, multiple rounds of circular F-actin generation, which initially occurred ~70 min following mitochondrial damage, accompanied mitoaggregate disassembly. The total LifeAct-EGFP intensities increased concurrently with Parkin-labeled mitochondrial particle count within light-illuminated areas (Fig. 2j). All of the above support a functional link between the observed circular F-actins and mitoaggregate disassembly.
Our observed circular F-actin differ in form and function from other LifeAct-EGFP imaged F-actins during mitochondrial fission. For example, LifeAct-EGFP has been used to reveal transient actin assembly along tubular mitochondria during mitochondrial fission12. In our assay, the dynamics and temporal occurrence of this fission-related actin cycling, when detected, were distinct from that of circular F-actin observed during mitoaggregate disassembly (Supplementary Fig. 5a-b). These revealed that mitoaggregate disassembly-associated circular F-actins are different from those that drive mitochondrial fission.
Actinomyosin-dependent mitoaggregate disassembly
The functional relevance of actin polymerization on mitoaggregate disassembly was further evaluated using actin nucleation factor inhibitors. Mitoaggregate disassembly (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 6a) and circular F-actin formation (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Fig. 6b) were both significantly inhibited by treatment with CK66613 (an inhibitor of the actin nucleation factor Arp2/3) but not SMIFH214 (an inhibitor of the linear actin nucleation factor formin), indicating that Arp2/3-dependent actin mediates mitoaggregate disassembly. That mitoaggregate disassembly is formin-independent again confirms that the circular F-actin observed is distinct from fission-related actin (requires formin as reported)12,15. We also examined whether myosin II contributes to mitoaggregate disassembly, considering that interplay between myosin II and F-actin generates cellular force. Pre-treatment of cells with blebbistatin (a myosin II inhibitor)16 before light-induced mitophagy resulted in the formation of abnormal mitoaggregates composed of tubular mitochondria rather than grape-like clusters (Supplementary Fig. 5c-e). Given the involvement of myosin II in mitochondria fission17, these abnormal mitoaggregate structures likely arose from a block in mitochondria fission before mitoaggregate formation, further supporting the notion that grape-like mitoaggregates form after mitochondrial fission. To more specifically test whether myosin II partakes in mitoaggregate disassembly, we applied blebbistatin 40 min after photoillumination to allow the normal progression of mitochondrial fission that occurs immediately upon mitochondrial damage as reported18,19 (Supplementary Fig. 5f). Phenocopying the effect of CK666, this blebbistatin treatment led to defective disassembly of mitoaggregates (Fig. 3a). Another myosin II inhibitor, ML7, also blocked mitoaggregate disassembly and circular F-actin formation (Fig. 3b, c). All of the above point to a role of the actinomyosin system in driving mitoaggregate disassembly.
Mitoaggregate disassembly vs. autophagy initiation
Non-disassembled mitoaggregates (through Myosin II inhibition) were labeled by EGFP-LC3B (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 7a, b) as well as by the mitophagy receptor NDP52 (Supplementary Fig. 7c-e). Meanwhile, under CLEM examination, long-lived grape-like mitoaggregates (through Myosin II inhibition) are only sparsely decorated with isolation membranes (ISMs) on their surfaces (Fig. 3e, f). Non-disassembled mitoaggregates were rarely seen to be completely sequestered into autophagosomes as demonstrated by serial CLEM sections (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g). Using mRFP-EGFP-LC3B for real-time analysis of mitophagy degradation rate (Supplementary Fig. 8a-c)10, non-disassembled mitoaggregates were defective in their turnover by lysosomes (Supplementary Fig. 8d-e). These results demonstrated that EGFP-LC3B/NDP52 labeling seen on myosin II-blocked long-lived mitoaggregates did not represent complete autophagic engulfment of the mitoaggregates (LC3B may have become directly conjugated onto mitochondria owing to the observed colocalization between LC3B and Parkin-labeled mitoaggregates with blebbistatin treatment. However, under these conditions mRFP-EGFP-LC3B can still be used to track the delivery of damaged mitochondria into lysosome). Also, these observations let us hypothesize that actinomyosin-dependent mitoaggregate disassembly reduces mitochondrial dimensions for efficient sequestration by autophagic membranes.
Driven by the above findings, as well as the fact that the actinomyosin system participates in multiple stages of the autophagy process20, we further investigated if mitoaggregate disassembly is functionally linked to autophagy initiation during Parkin-mediated mitophagy. We found that the BATS domain, the carboxyl terminus of Atg14L, displayed circular dynamics at where mitoaggregates disassembled (Fig. 4a, b). BATS marked autophagy initiation sites during mitophagy, as they colocalized with Atg14L in fixed cells on Parkin-labeled mitochondria, and were spatially associated with autophagosome formation (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c). This is consistent with the fact that BATS-labeled structures are considered autophagy initiation sites due to their colocalization with Atg16 and Beclin 1 in starved cells21,22. Importantly, mitophagy-associated BATS structures appeared near circular F-actin at mitoaggregates (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 9d), and displayed synchronous formation dynamics (Fig. 4d). Blocking mitoaggregate disassembly by CK666 inhibited the formation of mitoaggregate-associated BATS structures (Fig. 4e). Circular F-actin mediated mitoaggregate disassembly is therefore functionally linked to autophagosome generation against Parkin-labeled mitoaggregates.
Retarding disassembly blocks autophagy initiation
We further devised an optogenetic approach (Fig. 5a) to suppress disassembly through reversible crosslinking of mitoaggregate interfaces, to demonstrate that mitoaggregate disassembly is required for efficient autophagosome formation against damaged mitochondria. To achieve this, EGFP-Ub (or TagRFP-Ub) was fused to CRY2, a domain that undergoes oligomerization in response to blue light23. As shown in Fig. 5b, CRY2-EGFP-Ub colocalized with Parkin-labeled mitochondria 80 min after mitochondrial damage, indicating that CRY2-EGFP-Ub is able to be selectively conjugated onto mitoaggregates. The spatial enrichment of CRY2 at the mitoaggregate interfaces makes it possible to extend the duration of mitoaggregate clustering through blue light illumination. In our experiments, mitoaggregates were selectively illuminated by 488 nm light for 1 min twice, 80 and 140 min after mitochondrial damage (Fig. 5b; dotted circles). Using this scheme we found that mitoaggregates were able to remain in the clustered form for up to 5 h (Fig. 5b, c; blue dotted region). As shown in Fig. 5c, these photoclustered, long-lived mitoaggregates lacked lysosomal markers and did not display EGFP quenching (CRY2-EGFP-Ub fluorescence would be lost in acidic lysosomes). This again demonstrated that Parkin-labeled mitoaggregates cannot be efficiently targeted into lysosomes for turnover in the absence of disassembly. Next we used the optogenetic photoclustering scheme to show that a direct block on mitoaggregate disassembly affects autophagy initiation against damaged mitochondrial fragments (Fig. 5d). We damaged two separate groups of mitochondria using 635-nm light within a cell (Fig. 5e); one mitoaggregate was subsequently photoclustered using 488-nm light, while the other was left as an internal control. 488-nm illumination caused local photobleaching in the green emission channel (Fig. 5f). However, because cytosolic hrGFP-BATS freely diffuses throughout the cytoplasm, the formation of BATS-labeled autophagy initiation sites can still be monitored and counted. Unlike at the control region, which showed increased BATS-positive structures during mitoaggregate disassembly (Fig. 5f; top mitoaggregates), photoclustered mitoaggregates displayed reduced BATS counts (Fig. 5f; bottom mitoaggregates and Fig. 5g). Apparent BATS structures on photoclustered mitoaggregates only occurred 5 h following mitochondrial damage (Fig. 5f; red arrows). These BATS-sites grew only on the surfaces of photoclustered mitoaggregates, reminiscent of TEM images of blebbistatin-treated cells, where ISMs only showed up sparsely on the surface of mitoaggregates (Fig. 3e, f). Similarly, the circular F-actin counts near photoclustered mitoaggregates were reduced (Supplementary Fig. 10a, b). Collectively, these results again indicated that disassembly is not only necessary to dimensionally fit mitoaggregates into autophagic membranes but also to make them accessible to autophagy initiation.
PIP2 regulates disassembly and autophagy initiation
It is known that BATS domain confers binding ability to PtdIns(4,5)P2 in vitro22, and this phospholipid association is essential for Atg14 complex formation and autophagy initiation. PtdIns(4,5)P2 is also known to regulate F-actin formation24. Thus, we asked whether PtdIns(4,5)P2 co-regulate mitoaggregate disassembly as well as the associated BATS-site formation. Mitoaggregate-associated BATS sites were not affected by the depletion of PtdIns(3)P via treatment with 200 nM wortmannin, an inhibitor of PtdIns 3-kinases (Supplementary Fig. 11a). Meanwhile, intracellular PtdIns(4,5)P2 were detected near disassembled mitoaggregates through immunofluorescence (Supplementary Fig. 11b). A tandem PH domain of PLCδ fused to EGFP was also utilized to monitor intracellular PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels during mitophagy25. With the exception of the PtdIns(4,5)P2-enriched plasma membrane, we observed intracellular PtdIns(4,5)P2 generation near Parkin-labeled mitochondria during mitoaggregate disassembly in HeLa cells expressing low levels of PH(PLCδ)x2-EGFP (Fig. 6a, b), indicating a role for PtdIns(4,5)P2 in the regulation of mitoaggregate disassembly and BATS-site generation.
To further map the localization of mitophagic PtdIns(4,5)P2, we location-specifically depleted PtdIns(4,5)P2 using PJ-Dead, a construct containing mRFP, FKBP, and phosphatase domains26. Through rapalog-induced dimerization of FKBP and FRB, PJ-Dead (containing FKBP) can be selectively recruited to targeted sites expressing an FRB domain and locally catalyzed PtdIns(4,5)P2 to PtdIns (Supplementary Fig. 11c). Mito-targeting (FRB-EBFP-Parkin) or ER-targeting (FRB-EGFP-Sec61β) PJ-Dead did not affect mitoaggresome disassembly (Supplementary Fig. 11d,e). Remarkably, omegasome-targeting (FRB-EGFP-DFCP1) PJ-Dead impaired mitoaggregate disassembly (Fig. 6c–f). Since DFCP1-positive omegasomes are specific ER subdomains that act as platforms essential for ISM formation9,27 and omegasome-targeting PJ-Dead depleted PtdIns(4,5)P2 near mitoaggregates (Fig. 6e and Supplementary Fig. 11f, g), these results indicated that PtdIns(4,5)P2 proximal to omegasome regulates mitoaggregate disassembly. Omegasome-proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2 depletion did not affected DFCP1 recruitment to Parkin-labeled mitochondria (Fig. 6g), but impaired BATS/circular F-actin formation near mitoaggregates (Fig. 6h). These non-disassembled mitoaggregates, induced by omegasome-targeting PJ-Dead, have NDP52 recruitment (Supplementary Fig. 12a), but were defective in their delivery into lysosomes (Supplementary Fig. 12b). Altogether, our results indicated that a pool of omegasome-proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2 co-regulates BATS-sites/circular F-actin formation and mitoaggregate remodeling required for efficient mitophagy (Fig. 6i).
Discussion
In this study, we discovered the presence of a pool of PtdIns(4,5)P2 adjacent to omegasomes, and that they coordinate mitoaggregate disassembly with autophagy initiation during Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Damaged mitochondria first become grape-like mitoaggregates. PtdIns(4,5)P2 then coordinates mitoaggregate disassembly with autophagy initiation to allow for efficient engulfment and turnover of impaired mitochondrial fragments.
The growing body of reports has indicated strong functional links between the actin cytoskeleton and autophagosome formation during starvation-induced autophagy28,29,30,31,32,33. Likewise, the mitophagy-associated F-actin could participate in the early stage of autophagosome formation owning to its synchronous formation with BATS-labeled autophagy initiation structures. Unlike CapZ-mediated PtdIns(3)P-dependent actin assembly in starvation-induced autophagy33, mitophagy-associated F-actin generation requires PtdIns(4,5)P2. We speculate that mitophagy-associated circular F-actin drive autophagosome generation by either serving as a scaffold for BATS (Atg14L) initiation structure formation or by disrupting mitoaggregates to increase the available surface accessible to ISMs growing from omegasomes. Three-dimensional structured-illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) revealed that circular F-actins represented curved sheet rather than spherical cages surrounding Parkin-labeled mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Synchronous formation of BATS and circular F-actin near mitoaggregates indicates that it is possible to simultaneously observe circular F-actin, omegasomes, and BATS structures in TEM images. However, we failed to observe cradle-like structures27, which have previously been reported as omegasomal structures, and circular F-actin in our TEM images of glutaraldehyde-fixed samples. In this regard, it will be interesting to map the omegasomal structures (e.g., through the use of APEX-DFCP1) and circular F-actin in TEM images of cryogenically preserved samples to visualize transient and vulnerable structures that are not easily preserved by chemical fixation.
How may cells determine the onset of mitoaggregate disassembly? Given that Pink1-dependent phosphorylation on Parkin and Ub initiate the cascade to drive mitochondrial clustering, termination of Pink1/Parkin activity may therefore be involved in the disassembly step. Declining Pink1 activities could allow for subsequent dephosphorylation of poly-Ub and de-ubiquitination, resulting in a tendency for the mitoaggregates to disassemble. Indeed, we observed that phosphorylation levels of Ub at Ser65, a substrate of Pink1 kinase34, were increased on clustered mitoaggregates, and decreased upon their disassembly (Supplementary Fig. 12c, d). Therefore, it will be interesting to examine whether non-disassembled mitoaggregates [via photoclustering or depleting omegasome-proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2] cause delayed dephosphorylation of Ub on Ser65, or vice versa, whether delayed dephosphorylation of Ub on Ser65 (by expressing constitutively active Pink135,36) affects PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent mitoaggregate disassembly. FRB-DFCP1-PJ-Dead depleted PtdIns(4,5)P2 near omegasomes but did not disturb the PtdIns(3)P-dependent DFCP1 localization on mitophagic substrates (Fig. 6d, e, g). On the other hand, wortmannin experiments showed that depleting PtdIns(3)P did not influence PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent BATS formation (Supplementary Fig. 11a). These results suggest that PtdIns(4,5)P2 and PtdIns(3)P signaling operate in parallel. This also suggests that PtdIns(3)P is not the sole signaling lipid for autophagy initiation; rather, PtdIns(4,5)P2 also plays a role, indicating another level of autophagy regulation. Increasing evidence suggests that PtdIns(4,5)P2 participates in autophagy, such as SNX18-dependent37 and Arf6-dependent38 autophagosome formation and Mss4-dependent mitophagy in yeast39. Whether PtdIns(4,5)P2 is locally synthesized or derived from pre-existing membrane sources remains an interesting topic for future study. Indeed, it has been reported that Atg14L interacts with PIP5KIC40, indicative of PtdIns conversion from PtdIns(4)P to PtdIns(4,5)P2 during autophagy initiation. Thus, it will also be interesting to examine whether PtdIns(4)P-enriched Golgi serves as a donor for PtdIns(4,5)P2 generation near omegasomes.
Why do cells go through the trouble of clustering the to-be-turned-over mitochondria, only to have them disassembled at a later stage for autophagic turnover? One reason is that this prevents the possibility of overwhelming the autophagy system, as well as reduces cellular stress. Dysfunctional mitochondria are first clustered for the reduction of cellular toxicity. Depending on the capacity and availability of the autophagy machinery, cells will then fine tune their rates of mitoaggregate disassembly so as to minimize the presence of free floating dysfunctional mitochondria in the cytoplasm. In accordance with this idea, we observed that mitoaggregate disassembly occurred at the autophagosome generating platform omegasomes, indicating that disassembly can only be as fast as the rate of autophagosome generation. In summary, our findings on the roles of omegasome-proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2 in Parkin-mediated mitophagy, together with recent reports of early-onset Parkinsonism-associated synaptojanin41,42, may underlie the pathogenic roles of PtdIns metabolism. Further efforts to reveal the interplay between PtdIns(4,5)P2- and PtdIns(3)P-dependent signaling axes near the omegasome will provide new insights into mitochondrial autophagy and the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease.
Methods
Plasmids, antibodies, and siRNAs
EBFP2-Parkin and TagRFP-Parkin were constructed by subcloning EBFP2 (Addgene, 14893) and TagRFP (Evrogen, FP141) into EYFP-Parkin (Addgene, 23955) respectively. KillerRed-dMito (KR-dMito) was from Evrogen (FP964). EGFP-dMito and TagRFP-dmito was constructed by PCR amplification of the mitochondrial matrix targeting sequence from KR-dMito, followed by its insertion into EGFP-C1 and TagRFP respectively. LifeAct-EGFP was generated by inserting LifeAct into pEGFP-C1. mRFP-EGFP-LC3B, EGFP-LC3B, LAMP1-YFP, hrGFP-BATS, EGFP-Atg14L, and PJ-Dead were obtained from Addgene (21074, 11546, 1816, 30496, 21635, and 38002). EB3-EGFP, EGFP-vimentin, EGFP-p62, PH(PLCδ)x2-EGFP, EGFP-DFCP1, EGFP-NDP52, and EGFP-Sec61β, and TPC2-TagRFP were constructed through PCR amplification of human genes from HeLa cell total cDNA, followed by their insertion into the pEGFP-C1 and TagRFP backbone respectively. TagRFP-BATS and TagRFP-LC3B was constructed by subcloning TagRFP into hrGFP-BATS and EGFP-LC3B. CRY2-EGFP-Ub and CRY2-TagRFP-Ub were constructed by subcloning CRY2 into EGFP-Ub (Addgene, 11928) and TagRFP-Ub. FRB-EGFP-DFCP1, FRB-EBFP2-Parkin, and FRB-EGFP-Sec61β were constructed through PCR amplification of human genes from HeLa cell total cDNA, followed by insertion into EGFP-DFCP1, EBFP2-Parkin, and EGFP-Sec61β respectively. All primer sequences used for cloning are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Alexa Fluor 647 Phalloidin was from Life Technologies (A22287). Primary antibodies used for immunofluorescence were GFP (Life Technologies, A11122, 1:500), PIP2 (Abcam, [clone 2C11] ab11039, 1:200), and phospho-Ub Ser65 (Merck, ABS1513-I, 1:500). Secondary antibodies used were Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (Life Technologies, A11029, 1:1000) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit (Life Technologies, A11034, 1:2000). Small interfering RNAs used were p62 siRNA (Thermo Scientific, M-010230-00-0005).
Cell culture and transfection
HeLa cells (ATCC, CCL-2) and HEK293 (ATCC, CRL-1573) were cultured in DMEM medium (Life Technologies, 11965) supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies, 10437) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, 15140), and maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. DAPI staining was used to ensure the absence of mycobacterium contamination. Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, 11668) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For knockdown experiments, siRNAs were transfected twice into HeLa cells with 24 h intervals through Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technologies, 13778075) or Lipofactamine 2000 based on manufacturer’s protocol. Cell staining with MitoTracker Deep Red FM (Life Technologies, M22426): 100 nM in complete medium for 30 min at 37 °C. Blebbistatin (Enzo Life Sciences, BML-El315) was used at 20 μM (added into the cell medium 40–50 min post induction of mitophagy or before induction of mitophagy). ML-7 (Enzo, BML-EI197) was used at 30 μM. CK666 (Enzo Life Sciences, ALX-270-506) was used 200 μM (applied 1 h before light-assisted mitophagy). SMIFH2 (Merck millipore, 344092) was used at 25 μM (applied before light-assisted mitophagy). Wortmannin (Sigma, W1628) was used 200 nM before light-assisted mitophagy. Rapalog (Clontech #635055) was used at 500 nM before light-assisted mitophagy.
Live cell manipulation and time-lapse microscopy
Light-assisted Parkin-mediated mitophagy was performed and imaged on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope (60 × , numerical aperture = 1.2 water objective) equipped with a SIM scanner. Live HeLa cells were maintained under 37 °C and 5% CO2 on the microscope for manipulation and observation (Tokai Hit, #MIU-IBC). To achieve light-assisted Parkin-mediated mitophagy, we point-scanned either 30 μW 559 nm (for KR-dMito) or 100 μW 635 nm (for MitoTracker DeepRed FM) light in chosen regions of interests in HeLa cells using Olympus FV1000’s tornado scanning. To photo-maintain mito-aggregation, we point-scanned 488 nm light over chosen mitoaggregates (labeled by EBFP2-Parkin) of interest in HeLa cells using Olympus FV1000’s tornado scanning. A zero drift compensator module (Olympus) was used to correct sample drift in the z direction during live cell imaging. Images were adjusted for brightness and compiled into time-lapse images using Image J (National Institutes of Health).
Immunofluorescence
Cells cultured on ibidi gridded glass bottom dishes (81168) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (EMS, 15711) at room temperature for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2% BSA at 4 °C for 10 min, blocked with 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS containing 2% BSA at room temperature for 30 min, and incubated with primary antibodies following manufacturers’ recommendations (phalloidin AF647). For EGFP-Atg14 immunostaining, cell were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min, permeabilized and blocked with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2% BSA at 4 °C for 1 h, immunostained with primary antibodies in PBS buffer containing 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 2% BSA overnight at 4 °C, and probed with secondary antibodies (1:2000) in PBS buffer containing 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 2% BSA at room temperature for 1 h. For PIP2 immunostaining, cells cultured on ibidi gridded glass bottom dishes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, G5882) at room temperature for 15 min, permeabilized and blocked with 0.5% (v/v) Saponin in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2% BSA at 4 °C for 45 min, immunostained with primary antibodies in PBS buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) Saponin and 2% BSA overnight at 4 °C, probed with secondary antibodies (1:1000) in PBS buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) Saponin and 2% BSA at 4 °C for 1 h, and post-fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C for 10 min. For phospho-Ub Ser65 immunostaining, cells cultured on ibidi gridded glass bottom dishes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min, permeabilized and blocked with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 2% BSA at 4 °C for 1 h, immunostained with primary antibodies in PBS buffer containing 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 2% BSA at 4 °C for 1 h, and probed with secondary antibodies (1:2000) in PBS buffer containing 0.02% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 2% BSA at room temperature for 1 h. Images were captured on an Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope.
Fragmentation analysis and BATS/actin, DFCP1-sites, or PH(PLCδ)x2-EGFP intensity calculation
To count the number of EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondrial particles, images were thresholded, followed by particle identification using the Analyze Particles function in Image J. To count the number of BATS or DFCP1 structures near mitophagic substrates, regions containing EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondria were defined through the Color Threshold function in Image J. The total counts of BATS or DFCP1 within these defined regions were measured using the Analyze Particles function in Image J. The total counts of BATS were binned into 10 min intervals to calculate the total number of BATS as shown in Fig. 5g. The total number of circular actin was manually calculated. The raw intensities of PH(PLCδ)x2-EGFP within EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondria were calculated through the Measure function in Image J and were divided by area of EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondria to calculate mean PH(PLCδ)x2-EGFP intensities on mitoaggregates.
Quantifying mitophagosome maturation through mRFP-EGFP-LC3B
Quantification of mRFP-EGFP-LC3B fluorescence on EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondria was performed using Image J. In brief, regions containing EBFP2-Parkin labeled mitochondria were defined through the Color Threshold function in Image J. The total mRFP and EGFP signals within these identified regions were measured using the Measure function in Image J.
Correlative light and electron microscopy
HeLa cells seeded on MatTek gridded glass (P35G-1.5-14-CGRD-D) bottom dishes co-expressing EBFP2-Parkin, EGFP-LC3B, and KR-dMito were 559 nm illuminated to activate for mitophagy. Cells were first fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min and imaged under a confocal microscope (Olympus FV1000). The samples were then fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (EMS, 11652, pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 16 h, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (EMS, 19150) at room temperature for 1 h, dehydrated, and embedded in Low Viscosity Embedding Kit (EMS, #14300). They were further trimmed and sliced to 70 nm thickness sections using ultramicrotome (Leica Ultracut UCT). Sections were stained with uranyl acetate (EMS, 22400) and lead citrate (EMS, #17810) before imaging under TEM (Hitachi H7000).
Structured-illumination microscopy
HeLa cells seeded on ibidi Grid-500 glass bottom (81168) dishes co-expressing EBFP2-Parkin, LifeAct-EGFP, and KR-dMito were 559 nm illuminated to activate for mitophagy. Cells were time-lapse imaged under a confocal microscope, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde when circular F-actin assemblies appear around Parkin-labeled mitochondria. The fixed samples were further imaged under a Zeiss ELYRA S1.
Statistical analysis
No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. Experiments were not randomized, and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.
Data availability
The data sets generated from this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Youle, R. J. & Narendra, D. P. Mechanisms of mitophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 9–14 (2011).
Eiyama, A. & Okamoto, K. PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy in mammalian cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 33, 95–101 (2015).
Springer, W. & Kahle, P. J. Regulation of PINK1-Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Autophagy 7, 266–278 (2011).
Okatsu, K. et al. p62/SQSTM1 cooperates with Parkin for perinuclear clustering of depolarized mitochondria. Genes Cells 15, 887–900 (2010).
Narendra, D., Kane, L. A., Hauser, D. N., Fearnley, I. M. & Youle, R. J. p62/SQSTM1 is required for Parkin-induced mitochondrial clustering but not mitophagy; VDAC1 is dispensable for both. Autophagy 6, 1090–1106 (2010).
Vives-Bauza, C. et al. PINK1-dependent recruitment of Parkin to mitochondria in mitophagy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 378–383 (2010).
Lee, J. Y., Nagano, Y., Taylor, J. P., Lim, K. L. & Yao, T. P. Disease-causing mutations in parkin impair mitochondrial ubiquitination, aggregation, and HDAC6-dependent mitophagy. J. Cell Biol. 189, 671–679 (2010).
Mizushima, N., Ohsumi, Y. & Yoshimori, T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 27, 421–429 (2002).
Axe, E. L. et al. Autophagosome formation from membrane compartments enriched in phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate and dynamically connected to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 182, 685–701 (2008).
Hsieh, C. W., Chu, C. H., Lee, H. M. & Yuan Yang, W. Triggering mitophagy with far-red fluorescent photosensitizers. Sci. Rep. 5, 10376 (2015).
Riedl, J. et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Methods 5, 605–607 (2008).
Moore, A. S., Wong, Y. C., Simpson, C. L. & Holzbaur, E. L. Dynamic actin cycling through mitochondrial subpopulations locally regulates the fission-fusion balance within mitochondrial networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 12886 (2016).
Nolen, B. J. et al. Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex. Nature 460, 1031–1034 (2009).
Rizvi, S. A. et al. Identification and characterization of a small molecule inhibitor of formin-mediated actin assembly. Chem. Biol. 16, 1158–1168 (2009).
Korobova, F., Ramabhadran, V. & Higgs, H. N. An actin-dependent step in mitochondrial fission mediated by the ER-associated formin INF2. Science 339, 464–467 (2013).
Straight, A. F. et al. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science 299, 1743–1747 (2003).
Korobova, F., Gauvin, T. J. & Higgs, H. N. A role for myosin II in mammalian mitochondrial fission. Curr. Biol. 24, 409–414 (2014).
Chakrabarti, R. et al. INF2-mediated actin polymerization at the ER stimulates mitochondrial calcium uptake, inner membrane constriction, and division. J. Cell Biol. 217, 251–268 (2018).
McLelland, G. L. et al. Mfn2 ubiquitination by PINK1/parkin gates the p97-dependent release of ER from mitochondria to drive mitophagy. eLife 7, e32866 (2018).
Zientara-Rytter, K. & Subramani, S. Role of actin in shaping autophagosomes. Autophagy 12, 2512–2515 (2016).
Sun, Q. et al. Identification of Barkor as a mammalian autophagy-specific factor for Beclin 1 and class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 19211–19216 (2008).
Fan, W., Nassiri, A. & Zhong, Q. Autophagosome targeting and membrane curvature sensing by Barkor/Atg14(L). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7769–7774 (2011).
Bugaj, L. J., Choksi, A. T., Mesuda, C. K., Kane, R. S. & Schaffer, D. V. Optogenetic protein clustering and signaling activation in mammalian cells. Nat. Methods 10, 249–252 (2013).
Papayannopoulos, V. et al. A polybasic motif allows N-WASP to act as a sensor of PIP(2) density. Mol. Cell 17, 181–191 (2005).
Varnai, P. & Balla, T. Visualization of phosphoinositides that bind pleckstrin homology domains: calcium- and agonist-induced dynamic changes and relationship to myo-[3H]inositol-labeled phosphoinositide pools. J. Cell Biol. 143, 501–510 (1998).
Hammond, G. R. et al. PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 are essential but independent lipid determinants of membrane identity. Science 337, 727–730 (2012).
Hayashi-Nishino, M. et al. A subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum forms a cradle for autophagosome formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1433–1437 (2009).
Kast, D. J., Zajac, A. L., Holzbaur, E. L., Ostap, E. M. & Dominguez, R. WHAMM directs the Arp2/3 complex to the ER for autophagosome biogenesis through an actin comet tail mechanism. Curr. Biol. 25, 1791–1797 (2015).
Coutts, A. S. & La Thangue, N. B. Actin nucleation by WH2 domains at the autophagosome. Nat. Commun. 6, 7888 (2015).
Tang, H. W. et al. Atg1-mediated myosin II activation regulates autophagosome formation during starvation-induced autophagy. EMBO J. 30, 636–651 (2011).
Zavodszky, E. et al. Mutation in VPS35 associated with Parkinson’s disease impairs WASH complex association and inhibits autophagy. Nat. Commun. 5, 3828 (2014).
Aguilera, M. O., Beron, W. & Colombo, M. I. The actin cytoskeleton participates in the early events of autophagosome formation upon starvation induced autophagy. Autophagy 8, 1590–1603 (2012).
Mi, N. et al. CapZ regulates autophagosomal membrane shaping by promoting actin assembly inside the isolation membrane. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 1112–1123 (2015).
Koyano, F. et al. Ubiquitin is phosphorylated by PINK1 to activate parkin. Nature 510, 162–166 (2014).
Okatsu, K. et al. PINK1 autophosphorylation upon membrane potential dissipation is essential for Parkin recruitment to damaged mitochondria. Nat. Commun. 3, 1016 (2012).
Wauer, T. et al. Ubiquitin Ser65 phosphorylation affects ubiquitin structure, chain assembly and hydrolysis. EMBO J. 34, 307–325 (2015).
Knaevelsrud, H. et al. Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation. J. Cell Biol. 202, 331–349 (2013).
Moreau, K., Ravikumar, B., Puri, C. & Rubinsztein, D. C. Arf6 promotes autophagosome formation via effects on phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate and phospholipase D. J. Cell Biol. 196, 483–496 (2012).
Wang, K. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases are required for autophagic membrane trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 37964–37972 (2012).
Tan, X., Thapa, N., Liao, Y., Choi, S. & Anderson, R. A. PtdIns(4,5)P2 signaling regulates ATG14 and autophagy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10896–10901 (2016).
Krebs, C. E. et al. The Sac1 domain of SYNJ1 identified mutated in a family with early-onset progressive Parkinsonism with generalized seizures. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1200–1207 (2013).
Quadri, M. et al. Mutation in the SYNJ1 gene associated with autosomal recessive, early-onset Parkinsonism. Hum. Mutat. 34, 1208–1215 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by an Academia Sinica Career Development Award (to W.Y.Y.) and a NSC 101-2311-B-001-027-MY3 research grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan. Experiments and data analysis were performed in part through the use of the advanced optical microscopes at Division of Instrument Service of Academia Sinica and with the assistance of Shu-Chen Shen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.-W.H. conceived the project, performed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. C.-W.H. and W.Y.Y. edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Nicholas Ktistakis and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hsieh, CW., Yang, W.Y. Omegasome-proximal PtdIns(4,5)P2 couples F-actin mediated mitoaggregate disassembly with autophagosome formation during mitophagy. Nat Commun 10, 969 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08924-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08924-5
This article is cited by
-
Elevated α-synuclein levels inhibit mitophagic flux
npj Parkinson's Disease (2024)
-
Myeloid deficiency of the intrinsic clock protein BMAL1 accelerates cognitive aging by disrupting microglial synaptic pruning
Journal of Neuroinflammation (2023)
-
The multiple links between actin and mitochondria
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2023)
-
GRAF1 integrates PINK1-Parkin signaling and actin dynamics to mediate cardiac mitochondrial homeostasis
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Prefused lysosomes cluster on autophagosomes regulated by VAMP8
Cell Death & Disease (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.