Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Prospects for low-toxicity lead-free perovskite solar cells

Abstract

Since the 2012 breakthroughs1,2,3, it is now very much accepted that halide perovskite solar cells may have a strong practical impact in next-generation solar cells. The most efficient solar cells are using Pb-based halide perovskites. The presence of Pb in these devices, however, has caused some concerns due to the high perceived toxicity of Pb, which may slow down or even hinder the pace of commercialization. Therefore, the science community has been searching for lower-toxicity perovskite-type materials as a back-up strategy. The community is paying significant attention to Pb-free materials and has achieved promising results albeit not yet approaching the spectacular performance of APbI3 materials. In this comment, we summarize the present status and future prospects for Pb-free perovskite materials and their devices.

Limitations of Pb-based halide perovskite materials

The optical and electrical properties of Pb-based perovskites look almost perfect for solar cells4. The latest efficiency of perovskite solar cells reached 23.7%5, outperforming that of Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)2, CdTe, and Si-based solar cells. However, Pb-based perovskite solar cells have two main concerns: poor stability and high toxicity6. The stability challenge in these perovskites is being addressed through the use of two-dimensional (2D) perovskites as well as improved device engineering and encapsulation7,8. The development of low-toxicity Pb-free materials is of course always preferred in the solar cell market if performance is not too compromised. Ideal Pb-free candidates as solar cell absorbers should have low toxicity, narrow direct bandgaps, high optical-absorption coefficients, high mobilities, low exciton-binding energies, long charge-carrier lifetimes, and good stability. Fortunately, there are some low-toxicity constituents with perovskite structure having attractive properties, such as Sn/Ge-based halides, some double perovskites, and some Bi/Sb-based halides with perovskite-like structure, see Fig. 16,9.

Fig. 1
figure1

Potential materials as solar cell absorbers. a Potential A-site cations (organic MA and FA or inorganic Cs and Rb), metals, and halides (I, Br, Cl) for perovskite structure. b Bandgaps of various materials4,6,8,9,18,19. The suitable materials for solar cells should have direct bandgaps of around 1.1 to 2.0 eV

Sn-based halide perovskite materials

Among these candidates, Sn-based perovskites have attracted the most attention due to their very similar properties, and the most promising performance achieved by their devices10. The representative methylammonium tin iodide (MASnI3), formamidinium tin iodide (FASnI3), and cesium tin iodide (CsSnI3) have direct bandgaps of around 1.20, 1.41, and 1.3 eV11, respectively, which are even narrower and more attractive than those of their Pb-based analogs. After exposure to ambient air, the Sn-based perovskites degrade to Sn4+ becoming SnO2, which is an environment-friendly material. A quick inspection of all the fundamental physical properties of the Sn-based perovskites and a comparison with those of the Pb-based ones reveal a remarkable similarity11. Therefore, at least in-principle these materials should be able to match the efficiencies of the APbI3 systems.

As the first report on Sn-based perovskite solar cells which achieved power conversion efficiency (PCE) of around 6%10,12, many reports have focused on Sn-based perovskite solar cells6. So far, the highest efficiency of Sn-based perovskite solar cells has been reported to have reached 9.6% (Fig. 2)13. Taking a closer look at the photovoltaic parameters, Sn-based perovskite solar cells usually have high short-circuit current densities (Jsc’s) of 20 to 25 mA cm−2 because of their low bandgaps. However, the average of open-circuit voltage (Voc) of the solar cells is only around 0.5 V, which is much lower than 1.1 V of the Pb-based analogs6. One of the main reasons for the low Voc of the Sn-based perovskite solar cells should be the heavy p-type doping of the materials, attributed to the very facile and undesirable oxidization of Sn2+ to Sn4+, which acts as a p-type dopant in the structure resulting in too high dark-carrier concentration and very high photocarrier recombination.

Fig. 2
figure2

Comparison of structure, efficiency, and stability of different materials and devices. a Crystals structures of FASnI3 (left), Cs2AgBi(ClBr)6 (middle), and Cs3Bi2I9 (right)19. b Record efficiencies of representative solar cells using Pb, Sn, Ge, Sb, and Bi-based absorbers6,9,13,18. c Stability of representative Sn, Ge, and Bi-based perovskite solar cells under different conditions, i.e., encapsulated (E), unencapsulated (UE), ambient air, glovebox (N2), and light soaking6,9,13,18

Recently, it was shown that adding ethylenediammonium (en) cations give rise to Sn-based perovskites with new types of three-dimensional (3D) so-called hollow perovskites14,15, markedly tuning the bandgap from 1.3 to 1.9 eV. As a result, the 3D hollow Sn-based perovskite solar cells with 10% en addition achieved a much higher Voc’s and PCEs than the standard ASnI3 perovskites (0.48 V and 7.14% vs. 0.15 V and 1.4%)14. The record efficiency of 9.6% in a recent report was achieved by also adding 1% en combining 20% guanidinium (GA)13. Other cations, such as phenylethylammonium (PEA) and butylammonium (BA), resulting in low-dimensional structures are also attractive8. The representatives of 2D (PEA)2(MA)n−1SnnI3n+1 and (BA)2(MA)n−1SnnI3n+1 perovskites have much better stability because of the protection of the organic spacing layers. Especially, recent reports describe high performance usually using the 2D Sn-based perovskites with an inverted device structure6, giving the highest PCE of 9.4%. The use of both 3D hollow and 2D perovskite in the same films can significantly improve the stability of the Sn-based perovskite solar cells (Fig. 2c).

Cs2SnX6 (X = I, Br) is the most stable of Sn-based perovskites. This is a peculiar compound that has a stable Sn4+ and therefore does not oxidize, but it does not have a fully 3D perovskite structure, which is a major disadvantage. Cs2SnI6 has a narrow direct bandgap of 1.3 to 1.6 eV (Fig. 1)16. However, it has an isolated octahedron and have too low mobility and too high minority carrier-effective masses. If future progress is made in extending the carrier-diffusion lengths of this material, such as making high-quality films with big grains and less defects, it would be possible to increase the PCEs.

Ge-based halide perovskite materials

There Ge-based perovskites also have similar properties with the Pb-based perovskites though not as similar as the Sn analogs17. In the AGeI3 perovskite family, CsGeI3 has the narrowest bandgap of around 1.6 eV (Fig. 1), whereas MAGeI3 and FAGeI3 have wider direct bandgaps of around 1.9 and 2.2 eV, respectively. Based on bandgap, it looks like only CsGeI3 is suitable as solar cell absorber. However, the current results in solar cell efficiency show that the Ge-based perovskites are even more inferior than the Sn-based perovskites. Making stable and high-performance solar cells using the Ge-based perovskites has been challenging.

More promising are Ge and Sn alloys, which have narrower bandgaps and better stability than the neat Ge-based perovskites18. All-inorganic high-quality CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 perovskite films with a bandgap of 1.5 eV can be fabricated by thermal evaporation18, and solar cells gave a remarkable PCE of 7.11% (Fig. 2b). More remarkably, the CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 solar cell without encapsulation can maintain 92% of its initial efficiency after 500 h of continuous operation under 1-sun illumination at 45 °C in N2 atmosphere (Fig. 2c). Even when exposed in ambient air, the solar cells can still retain 91% of its initial efficiency after 100 h of continuous light soaking. The improved stability was attributed to the protection of an ultra-thin GeO2 surface layer on the CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 film.

Other Pb-free halide perovskite materials

Apart from the directly analogous Sn and Ge-based perovskites, double perovskites with a formula of A2M+M3+X6 have been pursued (Fig. 2a)9. These 3D materials exhibit wider bandgaps of around 2 eV and tend to be more stable in air, however, they exhibit parity-forbidden transitions, indirect bandgaps, 0D electronic dimensionality, and large hole/electron-effective masses, leading to low mobilities and poor carrier transport. Therefore, solar cells based on Bi-based double perovskites have not achieved high Jsc’s and PCEs, and fall in a similar category with the Cs2SnI6-based solar cells.

Other Bi and Sb-based compounds, e.g., Cs3Sb2I9 and Cs3Bi2I9, have similar bandgaps of around 2 eV19. These materials are stable in air, however, they do not have a 3D structure (Fig. 2a) or direct bandgaps. They also have strongly bound excitons, which inhibit free carrier generation. Therefore, they have similarly low mobilities, poor charge transport, and high resistivities of 1010 to 1012 Ω cm19. Solar cells using them as absorbers definitely have the same problem, which is very low Jsc’s and PCEs. It looks that both these two types of Bi-based perovskite materials are not ideal as solar cell absorbers.

Future prospects of Pb-free halide perovskite materials

On the basis of the above discussion, it looks like that only the Sn-based perovskites are promising for achieving high performance in the near future (Fig. 2b). However, the Sn-based perovskites have significantly worse stability than the Pb-based ones even with encapsulation. The Sn and Pb-based perovskites can borrow technologies from each other to further address the stability issues. We cannot yet judge, however, if they are viable candidates before the stability concern is addressed. Nevertheless, PCEs of 10% or higher are likely on the horizon. Once the Sn4+ oxidation issue is fully addressed and photocarrier recombination rates are suppressed to the levels of the APbI3 materials, Voc of about 0.8 to 1.00 V should be achievable, which in turn will open the path to PCE beyond 15% and dramatically improve their future prospects to a viable lead-free contender. A neighbor of Sn-based perovskites, Ge-based perovskites, is not an ideal choice. However, the mixed Ge/Sn-based perovskites appear to be promising if future work can get the efficiencies higher than 10%. More work in needed to understand the ʽmagicʼ improvement of stability in future studies. One potential problem of Ge-based solar cells is the extremely high cost of Ge. So far, the Pb-free perovskite materials offer is poor dichotomy, (i) path to high-efficiency but poor stability (Sn2+-based), or (ii) good stability but low-performance (Sn4+/Sb/Bi-based etc.). Can we find an ideal Pb-free material with combined good optical and electrical properties with good stability? We hope more researchers will focus on this challenge. Although, the total Pb-weight of a 500 nm-thick perovskite film in solar cells may be small and the device engineering efforts will provide a safe and convincing solution including strategies for recycling Pb-based perovskites, the pursuit of Pb-free devices is certainly a worthy effort. The candidates should be not limited to halide perovskite families, new materials such as chalcogenide perovskites and non-perovskites with new structures are also worth investigating. Clearly, the new candidates should not only have ability to achieve high efficiencies but also be low-cost, scalable fabrication, and most importantly stable enough to reach the industrial standards, at least keeping initial high efficiencies after long-term operational lifetime (around 1000 h) under 85 °C and 85% relative humidity. The technologies of perovskite solar cells are young and exciting and their wheel of development rolls on; future progress will be bright especially as more research and investment efforts are undertaken.

References

  1. 1.

    Chung, I., Lee, B., He, J., Chang, R. P. & Kanatzidis, M. G. All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 485, 486–489 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kim, H. S. et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2, 591 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lee, M. M., Teuscher, J., Miyasaka, T., Murakami, T. N. & Snaith, H. J. Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 338, 643–647 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stoumpos, C. C. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Halide perovskites: poor man’s high-performance semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 28, 5778–5793 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Best research-cell efficiencies. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/pv-efficiency-chart.20181221.pdf.

  6. 6.

    Ke, W., Stoumpos, C. C. & Kanatzidis, M. G. “Unleaded” perovskites: status quo and future prospects of tin-based perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. 1803230 (2018).

  7. 7.

    Tsai, H. et al. High-efficiency two-dimensional Ruddlesden-Popper perovskite solar cells. Nature 536, 312–316 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mao, L., Stoumpos, C. C. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Two-dimensional hybrid halide perovskites: principles and promises. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1171–1190 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Giustino, F. & Snaith, H. J. Toward lead-free perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1233–1240 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hao, F., Stoumpos, C. C., Cao, D. H., Chang, R. P. H. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Lead-free solid-state organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photon 8, 489–494 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stoumpos, C. C., Malliakas, C. D. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. 52, 9019–9038 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Noel, N. K. et al. Lead-free organic–inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3061–3068 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jokar, E., Chien, C.-H., Tsai, C.-M., Fathi, A. & Diau, E. W. Robust tin-based perovskite solar cells with hybrid organic cations to attain effciency approaching 10%. Adv. Mater. 31, 1804835 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ke, W. et al. Enhanced photovoltaic performance and stability with a new type of hollow 3D perovskite {en}FASnI3. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701293 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ke, W. et al. Efficient lead-free solar cells based on hollow {en}MASnI3 perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14800–14806 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee, B. et al. Air-stable molecular semiconducting iodosalts for solar cell applications: Cs2SnI6 as a hole conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15379–15385 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stoumpos, C. C. et al. Hybrid germanium iodide perovskite semiconductors: active lone pairs, structural distortions, direct and indirect energy gaps, and strong nonlinear optical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 6804–6819 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen, M. et al. Highly stable and efficient all-inorganic lead-free perovskite solar cells with native-oxide passivation. Nat. Commun. 10, 16 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    McCall, K. M., Stoumpos, C. C., Kostina, S. S., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Wessels, B. W. Strong electron–phonon coupling and self-trapped excitons in the defect halide perovskites A3M2I9 (A=Cs, Rb; M=Bi, Sb). Chem. Mater. 29, 4129–4145 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our study has been supported by the LEAP Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, and Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Award DE-SC0001059.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.K. and M.G.K. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mercouri G. Kanatzidis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ke, W., Kanatzidis, M.G. Prospects for low-toxicity lead-free perovskite solar cells. Nat Commun 10, 965 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08918-3

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing