The ubiquitous biomacromolecule DNA has an axial rigidity persistence length of ~50 nm, driven by its elegant double helical structure. While double and multiple helix structures appear widely in nature, only rarely are these found in synthetic non-chiral macromolecules. Here we report a double helical conformation in the densely charged aromatic polyamide poly(2,2′-disulfonyl-4,4′-benzidine terephthalamide) or PBDT. This double helix macromolecule represents one of the most rigid simple molecular structures known, exhibiting an extremely high axial persistence length (~1 micrometer). We present X-ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that reveal and confirm the double helical conformation. The discovery of this extreme rigidity in combination with high charge density gives insight into the self-assembly of molecular ionic composites with high mechanical modulus (~ 1 GPa) yet with liquid-like ion motions inside, and provides fodder for formation of other 1D-reinforced composites.


DNA molecules, which act as a storage and transfer platform for the genetic information of life, exhibit a double-stranded helical conformation1,2. Further applications of helical macromolecules involve not only enantioselective and asymmetric catalysts for chemical reactions, but also scaffolds and templates for supramolecular self-assembly3,4. Inspired by natural multi-stranded helical macromolecules such as polypeptides, collagen, and polysaccharides, researchers are engaged in constructing synthetic polymers with a variety of helical conformations3,4,5,6,7,8. Broadly speaking, the most widely used chemical and physical foundations to build double-stranded macromolecules rely on metal-directed (ligand-containing) self-assembly7,9, aromatic stacking10,11, and hydrogen-bonding-driven self-assembly (inter-strand hydrogen bonding)8,12,13.

The most commonly encountered structural motifs in oligomers that enable double helical formation are based on peptides14,15, peptide nucleic acids16, amidinium-carboxylate salt bridges6,8, and coordination polymers7,9,17,18,19. While synthetic single helical strands are relatively common, despite advances in synthetic strategies, the design of synthetic double helical strands in solution remains a challenge6,8,20,21,22. Isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (it-PMMA)23 forms double helices, but only in the solid crystalline state. In aromatic polymers, the amide linkage functionality is preferred as it participates in H-bonding. Generally, aromatic cores are meta- or ortho-linked to enable a twist necessary to form a helix, also known as a helical foldamer24,25,26. Additionally, the presence of polar side groups such as hydroxy (H-bonding) or pendant aliphatic moieties (steric hindrance) can drive helix formation27. To the best of our knowledge, with the exceptions of some oligomers, e.g., Yashima’s oligoresorcinol28 and Huc’s heteromeric oligoamides29, no synthetic motifs have been demonstrated to form double helices in water.

Herein, we describe an aromatic sulfonated all-para linked polyamide that possesses the double helical structure in water, thus leading to extreme axial rigidity of this polymer chain. As far as we know, this is the only instance of a synthetic polymer that can form a double helix in aqueous solution. This all-para, all-aromatic-backbone macromolecule is obtained using a simple, single-step interfacial polycondensation reaction. We verify formation of this double helix via complementary investigations utilizing X-ray diffraction (XRD), 23Na NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. This synthetic sulfonated aramid polyanion, poly-2,2'-disulfonyl-4,4'-benzidine terephthalamide (PBDT), can be used to form a unique series of hydrogels30,31 and ion gels32,33, which have displayed great potential as next-generation functional materials for batteries, fuel cells, and optical sensors. The high rigidity imparted by the double helix drives important properties in these materials. PBDT is a water-miscible polymer that forms a highly anisotropic lyotropic nematic liquid crystal (LC) phase34 at concentrations down to exceedingly low values (CPBDT ≥ 0.3wt%). Using 2H NMR spectroscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), we previously investigated nematic LC ordering and polymer chain–chain distance in PBDT aqueous solutions34. However, our previous studies could not verify the hypothesized double helix and did not elucidate the molecular configuration of double helical PBDT.

To compare with the nematic LC phase and discuss the origin of double helices in PBDT, we have studied a chemically similar control system, poly(2,2poly-2,2'-disulfonyl-4,4'-benzidine terephthalamide-disulfonyl-benzidine isophthalamide) (PBDI). PBDI is a non-LC polymer, and the only structural difference from PBDT is the meta linkage in the backbone instead of the para linkage. This relatively minor structural difference causes PBDI aqueous solutions (at any concentration) to exhibit no NMR, optical, or X-ray signatures of an LC phase35. Thus, the PBDI molecule is not a rigid rod and will not form the double helix. Thus, we demonstrate that the all-para linkage is essential to form the double helix structure.

In this article, we present complementary experimental and computational evidence for the PBDT double helix. Furthermore, we elaborate a number of similarities between PBDT and DNA molecules in order to highlight the unique characteristics of the double helical conformation of this synthetic rigid-rod polyelectrolyte. Probing the similarities between these two systems provides important insight towards the understanding of double helical systems and feeds into design principles for future discovery of functional materials.


XRD and rigidity of the PBDT double helix

The DNA double helical configuration was proposed by Watson and Crick1,2 based on an XRD pattern of DNA fibers by Rosalind Franklin36. Here, we employ XRD to study the packing structure and morphology of PBDT aqueous solutions. Since it is difficult to obtain aligned PBDT fibers, we have directly run XRD experiments on concentrated and magnetically oriented PBDT aqueous solutions. Figure 1 summarizes the structural configuration of PBDT and our XRD results, including data and simulations. As shown in Fig. 1a, we observe a highly ordered XRD pattern from a 20 wt% PBDT aqueous solution after placing the sample in a B field (≥0.5 T). To eliminate the effect of the solvent H2O, we subtract an intensity-scaled H2O diffraction pattern using MATLAB®. We include the relevant images in Supplementary Figure 1. Figure 1b shows the corresponding simulated results. The strong monodomain orientational order maintained after removal of the sample from the B field indicates the extremely long persistence length of the PBDT chain34, which we attribute to the rigid PBDT backbone and more importantly to the double helical structure.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

PBDT structural motifs along with experimental and simulated XRD results. a X-ray diffraction pattern for 20 wt% PBDT aqueous solution. The main diffractions are labeled A, B, C, D, E, and F and the helix tilt angle is θ. b The simulated X-ray diffraction pattern based on the HELIX software package (see also Supplementary Figure 1). The layer lines 1, 2, and 3 in the simulated results clearly mimic the experimental results. c The chemical repeat unit of PBDT includes one set of –SO3 groups (two sulfonate groups from one biphenyl unit) and two –NHCO– groups, each of which are mutually connected by one benzene ring. d The second PDBT strand is shifted 8.4 Å (B = P/4) away from the first strand along the helix axis. Numerous intermolecular interactions between chains (notably hydrogen bonding, dipole–dipole, and/or ion–dipole interactions between –SO3 and –NHCO– groups—shown as green dashed lines) and the rotation of each subunit contribute to the double helical conformation. e PBDT double helices self-assemble into an aligned (nematic) morphology in aqueous solution. The purple dots refer to Na+ counterions. The red dots are water molecules. f Elucidation of interchain bonding and molecular packing for PBDT with the double helical conformation. The helical parameters used for the X-ray simulation are also listed (P = 33.6 Å, h = 5.6 Å, a = 4 Å, Azimuthal shift = 180°)

Indeed, the aligned phase forms above a critical concentration (1.5 wt%)34, where the persistence length (stiffness) along the PBDT rod axis37 is >240 nm (Onsager theory)38 and ~670 nm (Flory theory)39. See Supplementary Note 1 for additional details. This persistence length is substantially longer than DNA (~50 nm)40, collagen triple helices (~52 nm)41, and other rigid helical molecules such as poly(benzyl-l-glutamate) (PBLG)42. Thus, PBDT exhibits perhaps the highest known rigidity persistence length of any simple molecular structure. With refinements in synthesis, we obtain higher molecular weight PBDT (see SI for details). The aligned phase forms at concentrations down to 0.3 wt% PBDT, which represents a persistence length of >1.2 μm.

In Fig. 1a, the black arrow on the bottom right shows the direction of sample alignment in the instrument, which is also the aligned axis of molecular orientation. Alignment can be imposed by either a weak applied magnetic field or simply by the cylindrical confines of an X-ray capillary34. The red solid line that passes through the diagonal of the pattern is the meridian. The diffraction peaks on the meridian are called meridional reflections, which usually represent subunit axial translations43. The blue solid line perpendicular to the meridian is the equator, with peaks called equatorial reflections. A helical diffraction pattern is usually represented by a series of layers or arcs along the meridian, called layer lines43,44. The layer line with closest distance to the equator gives the pitch length for a single helix or half pitch length for a double helix such as that described here. Based on the relationship between real space and reciprocal space, the positions of the layer lines are related to successive orders of the pitch length (P), which in this case is 33.6 Å. Starting from the equator, for a double helix, the layer lines are at spacings P/2, P/4, and P/643,44. All of the layer lines are at each side of the meridian, but usually not on the meridian, except for when the layer lines also correspond to the subunit translation43,44. Based on this background, the main diffraction patterns in Fig. 1a are labeled with A, B, C, D, E, and F (A = 5.6 Å, B = 8.4 Å, C = 16.8 Å, D ≈ 30 Å, E = 8 Å, and F = 3.3 Å). By correlating the diffraction patterns and the helical parameters, we can elucidate the double helical conformation of PBDT chains in aqueous solutions as follows.

In Fig. 1c, the chemical repeat unit of PBDT includes a set of two –SO3 groups that coincide approximately in a plane perpendicular to the molecular axis and two –NHCO– groups that are mutually connected by one benzene ring. The theoretical chemical repeat unit length of PBDT along the average molecular alignment axis is ca. 17.4 Å35 assuming all bonds are in the trans conformation. Here we observe a repeat distance along the aligned rod axis of 16.8 Å (C = P/2). This repeat unit is composed of three subunits with equal length of 5.6 Å (A = P/6). Figure 1d shows the combination of two PBDT chains, where the second strand is shifted 8.4 Å (B = P/4) away from the first strand. Intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding (between the –SO3 and –NHCO– functionalities), π stacking, and dipole–dipole interactions along with the rotation of each subunit contribute to the formation of the double helical conformation. B is the distance between adjacent –SO3 functionalities along the polymer chain. The average inter-helix distance (within one double helix) is represented by F. Figure 1e shows schematically the self-assembly behavior of PBDT chains in H2O (red) solution with Na+ counterions (purple). In 20 wt% PBDT aqueous solution, the rod–rod distance is ~30 Å, represented by D. This spacing is not clearly defined due to the interference of the diffracted beam with the beamstop, but we have further characterized this distance by SAXS, as introduced below. E corresponds to the overall average diameter of the double helix. In addition to the main diffraction peaks along the equator and meridian, we explain the displayed layer-line patterns by analogy with the layer-line diffractions of DNA fibers. The symmetry of a helical structure can usually be defined in terms of a number of parameters, including the subunit axial translation (h), the pitch of the helix (P), and the radius of the helix (r)43,44. The angle θ shown in Fig. 1e is the averaged angle from the perpendicular direction of the helix axis to the long (tangent) axis of the individual molecular chain, and can be extracted from the X-ray experimental results. Distinct from θ, the rotation angle for each subunit is 360°/6, where the denominator 6 is the number of subunits in one pitch length. To describe the origin of the layer-line patterns, we propose a model with critical parameters in Fig. 1f, based on which we simulate a diffraction pattern (Fig. 1b) using a helical diffraction simulation software package called HELIX44. We include detailed simulation parameters and information about HELIX in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Figure 2. The simulated results show high coincidence with the experimental results. The main difference is the absence of reflections on the meridian along the layer line number 1 and 2. We attribute this discrepancy to two factors: (1) The HELIX software cannot differentiate the –SO3 and –NHCO– functionalities, which are represented as the same subunits in the simulation program. (2) The HELIX program also assumes a perfectly oriented chain, whereas in experimental X-ray, we have PBDT aqueous nematic liquid crystalline solutions. The imperfect alignment of the phase (orientational order parameter Smatrix = 0.78 as introduced later) results in significant smearing of these peaks (layer lines) into crescents34. The additional diffractions on the meridian with length of B (8.4 Å) and C (16.8 Å) (Fig. 1a) are both attributed to axial subunit translation of the –SO3 functionalities between two chains and along one chain, respectively. The B and C features in particular show four-spot character (splittings on the layer lines) as observed in the simulations, but with smearing due to liquid crystalline orientational distributions of these rodlike molecules. Beyond these distortions, the layer-line spacings in the simulated results agree perfectly with the experimental results, thus confirming the double helical structure of PBDT.

Alignment and counterion associations by NMR and SAXS

In addition to XRD, quadrupolar NMR spectroscopy provides a complementary measurement of anisotropic structure and molecular dynamics in PBDT aqueous solutions. Strzelecka and Rill45,46 have employed 23Na NMR to investigate concentrated sodium-DNA aqueous solutions. They observed an 23Na triplet spectrum, which they attributed to the interaction between the Na quadrupole moment and the Na+ electric field gradient (efg) in the anisotropic ambient environment45,46. Herein, the quadrupolar splitting ΔνQ of the 23Na nucleus in a uniaxially aligned system can be expressed as

$$\Delta {\mathrm{\nu }}_{{Q}} = Q_{\mathrm{p}}\rho S_{{\mathrm{matrix}}}P_2(\cos \theta _{{Q}}) = Q_{\mathrm{p}}\rho S_{{\mathrm{matrix}}}\frac{{\left( {3{\mathrm{cos}}^2\theta _{{Q}} - 1} \right)}}{2},$$

where Qp is the quadrupolar coupling parameter that represents the 23Na spectral splitting when the nucleus is static and perfectly aligned, and θQ is the averaged angle between the principle axis of the Na+ efg tensor Vzz and the alignment axis of the PBDT matrix47. Smatrix is the order parameter of the aligned PBDT chain matrix, and ρ is the scaling factor representing the interaction between the quadrupolar probe species 23Na and the host PBDT matrix34,48,49. The average angle θQ will be highly dependent on temperature, local asymmetric environment, and concentration of PBDT. The reported magnitude of the splitting ΔνQ decreases with increasing PBDT concentration at low temperatures, whereas ΔνQ increases with concentration at high temperature. These temperature- and concentration-dependent changes in ΔνQ are consistent with the magnitude of P2(cosθQ). The quadrupole splitting and P2(cosθQ) converge to 0 when θQ is at the magic angle = 54.7°45,46.

By developing the experimental design for PBDT solutions based on these two varying factors, (temperature and concentration), we observe that PBDT and DNA solutions display highly consistent NMR spectroscopic (quadrupole splitting) behaviors. In Fig. 2a, the quadrupole splitting of 23Na will approximately converge to 0 at a null concentration CPBDT = C0 ≈ 10 wt% at 25 °C. The rod–rod distance at this concentration is 41 Å (see Supplementary Note 3). We attribute this quadrupole splitting dependence to the fact that Na+ ions can exchange, predominantly with –SO3 groups, both along the individual charged rods (PBDT double helices) as well as between –SO3 groups on different rods. In other words, Na+ can jump between two rigid PBDT rods in an inter-helical interaction, or Na+ can jump along a single rod in an intra-helical interaction. This process is both space and time averaged. Additionally, both intra-helical and inter-helical interactions are highly correlated to the concentration and temperature of PBDT aqueous solutions. As shown in Fig. 2b, at low PBDT concentration, the rod-rod distance is large, corresponding to dominant intra-helical Na+ interactions (translations) along the polymer chain. Na+ needs to axially translate 33.6 Å (one pitch length) to arrive at the next Na+ with exactly the same coordination location. As concentration increases, the rod–rod distance decreases, and at the concentration 9.1 wt% we observe the intersection point (blue circle) of the experimental data shown in Fig. 2f with ΔνQ = 0 Hz. This specific point corresponds to isotropically averaged Na+ interactions (inter-helical and intra-helical), as shown in Fig. 2c. With further concentration increase, we observe that ΔνQ increases again, corresponding to the dominance of the inter-helical interaction as compared to the intra-helical interaction as shown in Fig. 2d. Based on this deduction, when CPBDT = 9.1 wt% with θQ = 54.7°, the ratio (P/r) of the pitch length (33.6 Å) to the rod–rod distance r is 1/√2. At this point where Na+ experiences isotropic averaging, we observe r = risotropic = 48 Å, as displayed in Fig. 2c. In summary, compared to previous double-stranded DNA studies, the 23Na NMR of counterions45,46 here shows splitting dependencies that provide more quantitative interpretation in terms of inter- and intra-strand ion exchange.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

23Na NMR spectroscopy and SAXS for PBDT aqueous solutions. Panel a shows concentration-dependent 23Na quadrupole spectra for PBDT solutions at 298 K. Panels bd show configurations of PBDT self-assembly behavior with increasing concentration, and the critical geometric parameters at the null (isotropically averaged) point where Na+ shows isotropic dynamics are displayed in c. Intra-helical Na+ interactions dominate in b, the null point is at c and inter-helical Na+ interactions dominate in d. Panel e shows SAXS results for PBDT aqueous solutions with CPBDT = 5%, 10%, and 20%. f The black open circles represent the observed 23Na quadrupole splitting as a function of increasing PBDT concentration. The red open circles show the calculated P2(cosθQ) based on a model incorporating the rod-rod distance (r) calculated from the double-stranded hexagonal lattice model and the pitch length (P = 33.6 Å) obtained from XRD. Panel g shows the 23Na quadrupole splittings as a function of temperature for PBDT with varying concentrations CPBDT = 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12%, and 14%. The error bars for the P2(cosθQ) model points shown in f are dominated by the standard deviation in PBDT polymer weight percent (C) in solution (ca. 2.5%) as a percentage of the total concentration of polymer in each solution (e.g., 0.025 × 5 wt% polymer). C determines the rod-rod distance (r ~ C−0.5) and also cosθQ, where cosθQ  = P/(P2 + r2)1/2. Thus, the error bars are calculated based only on the error in PBDT concentration. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

In order to further verify the proposed model, we employ SAXS to investigate the rod–rod distance in PBDT aqueous solutions with varying concentrations. As shown in Fig. 2e, we can access the rod–rod distance (r) based on the scattering vector q. By combining the SAXS results and our previously reported double-stranded hexagonal lattice model (Supplementary Note 3)34, we use the relationship between rod–rod distance r and polymer concentration CPBDT to obtain risotropic = 43 Å (at CPBDT = C0 = 9.1%), which agrees well with the risotropic = 48 Å obtained from the proposed model. Figure 2f shows the experimental 23Na splitting and P2(cosθQ) extracted from the double helix hexagonal lattice model. θQ can be obtained from Eq. (2).

$$\theta _{{Q}} = {\mathrm{arctan}}(\frac{r}{{33.6}}).$$

The blue area displays the concentration range where the inter- and intra-helical interactions are neutralized (isotropically averaged). Thus, in complement with X-ray scattering, we can utilize 23Na quadrupolar NMR spectroscopy to quantitatively verify the double helical structure of PBDT.

In addition to the concentration dependence of the 23Na NMR quadrupole splitting, we can also explore the 23Na quadrupole splitting as a function of temperature. We observe a similar splitting pattern dependence as with concentration, in which the splitting first decreases across the null point and then increases again with temperature (Fig. 2g). Furthermore, we observe that C0 is proportional to temperature, as indicated by the red line at ΔνQ = 0 Hz. This unusual dependence is also clearly observed in aqueous solutions of DNA molecules46. The longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) spin relaxation times of Na+ counterions in PBDT solutions also parallel results for DNA, and are included in Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Figure 3.

Molecular dynamics simulations of double helix formation

Finally, we describe the PBDT chain configuration based on MD simulation studies conducted using particular simulation packages, thermodynamic conditions, and sets of force field parameters. As shown in Fig. 3, we investigate self-assembly of the double helical structure when two chains are present. A double helix structure is formed during 120 ns of simulation time in water at T = 300 K and pressure = 1 atm. The estimated pitch length for this model is 3–4 monomer lengths, which is somewhat longer than XRD results. We note that MD simulations also show stable double helix formation even when employing substantially different simulation conditions (NPT ensemble, NVT ensemble, in water using different force fields, and in vacuum—see Methods: MD simulations section and Supplementary Figures 411). In this case, simulations were performed using the Gromacs code in the NPT ensemble50. Two PBDT monomers, each with four repeating units and measuring ≈6.8 nm in length, were initially placed side-by-side in a simulation box filled with water. After energy minimization, an equilibrium simulation was performed. During the first 30 ns, the two PBDT molecules intertwined with each other to form the double helical structure shown in Fig. 3a, e. The system was equilibrated for an additional 90 ns after the double helix self-assembled to ensure the structure is stable. Snapshots of the two PBDT monomers and their self-assembly process are shown in Fig. 3b–f. We performed two additional analyses to confirm that the double helical structure is stable and equilibrium was reached in our simulations (Supplementary Note 5, Supplementary Figures 4 and 5). Additionally, we computed the distribution of the Na+ counterions around the sulfonate groups in the PBDT solution. The results are shown in Supplementary Figures 6a and 8. As a reference, the distribution of water molecules around the sulfonate groups is also shown in Supplementary Figure 6b.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of PBDT polymer chains in water. a Simulation result for two oligomers with four monomers run for 120 ns in water at T = 300 K and P = 1 atm. bf Evolution of the conformation of the PBDT monomers during their self-assembly process. The snapshots show the two PBDT polyanions at b 0 ns, c 10 ns, d 20 ns, e 30 ns, f 120 ns in the simulation. Additional snapshots are shown in Supplementary Figures 6 and 8. The two PBDT monomers form a double helix structure at ≈30 ns, and the structure is stable for the rest of the simulation lasting 90 ns. The red and black balls denote the backbone atoms of the two PBDT monomers, and the yellow balls denote the sulfonate group atoms. The blue background dots denote the water molecules. Sodium counterions and explicit water atoms are omitted for clarity

Above all, we emphasize that the MD models confirm the existence of a double helical structure in this rigid-rod polyelectrolyte. It is clear that establishing this double helix relies on a wide variety of intermolecular interactions, most likely including ion–dipole, pi–pi stacking, hydrophobic effects, hydrogen bonding, and dipole–dipole interactions. This subtle self-assembly of a simple and compact molecular repeat unit involves more complex non-covalent interactions than the simple H-bonding found in DNA and yet with less molecular complexity than most other known double helical structures. Future studies will further unravel the specific interactions at play in order to provide additional insights for informed molecular design for tailored self-assemblies.


In this communication, we describe the molecular configuration of the sulfonated aramid PBDT in aqueous solutions. Based on complementary characterizations, we find a number of similarities between PBDT and DNA molecules and demonstrate the unique double-stranded helical structure of PBDT chains in aqueous solution. The strong self-assembly and extreme rigidity present in the PBDT system arises from a varied and synergistic array of interchain interactions, which are more complex and most likely stronger than the simple H-bonding-driven double helical self-assembly mechanism for DNA. We have tried many solvents to fully dissolve or denature PBDT and break the double helix, including acetone, toluene, alcohols, THF, ethylene glycol, several salt solutions at varying concentration, and DMSO. However, we found that none of them can dissolve PBDT or break the double helix into single chains. From the perspective of macromolecular structural and morphological understanding, this work provides critical ideas and directions for comprehending molecular packing and ionic association behavior in rigid-rod polyelectrolytes and other self-assembled structures. Furthermore, this work not only resolves the configuration of the PBDT molecular chain but also lays the foundation for discovering broader applications based on polyelectrolytes with extreme axial rigidity, such as highly conductive yet stiff molecular ionic composites32. Finally, this highly charged and rigid double helical structure (and/or its derivatives) could potentially become a new one-dimensional (1D) material additive for more general incorporation into functional composites.


PBDT solutions

The synthesized PBDT polymer was dried in a vacuum oven at room temperature for 2 days. PBDT aqueous solutions with weight percentages (wt%) ranging from 4% to 20% were prepared by loading the quantified amount of polymer (PBDT) and solvent (D2O) into 5 mm NMR tubes. D2O was used as received from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (99.9%). To prevent evaporation of water, all of the samples prepared in NMR tubes were flame-sealed immediately after loading. In addition, to ensure complete dissolution and homogenization of the polymer in water, the sealed NMR tubes were equilibrated at 80 °C in a water bath for 1 week prior to X-ray and NMR measurements.

23Na NMR

The Bruker Avance III WB 400 MHz (9.4 T) NMR spectrometer was equipped with a 5 mm axial saddle 23Na rf coil. A simple pulse-acquire sequence with a 90° RF pulse of 5 μs was applied for all measurements from 25–80 °C.

X-ray diffraction

The XRD measurements were performed with a single-crystal diffractometer (Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Nova) equipped with an Onyx CCD detector and a Cu microsource. The setup was operated at 49.5 kV and 80 mA at room temperature. The 20% PBDT aqueous solution was sealed in a quartz capillary with 1.5 mm diameter and 0.01 mm wall thickness and mounted on the edge of a steel pin. The sample-to-detector distance was set to 120 mm, thus offering a scattering angle 2θs from 5° to 34°. The capillary was oriented 45° angle relative to the beamstop thus minimizing interference with the beamstop in the diffraction patterns. The sample was rotated in steps of 2° in phi (along the fiber axis). To increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the diffraction pattern, a total of 200 frames, each with 1200 s exposure time were summed. The XRD patterns were collected and analyzed with CrysAlisPro (v1.171.37.35, Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, 2015; Rigaku Corporation, Oxford, UK).

Small-angle X-ray scattering

All SAXS results were acquired using a Rigaku S-Max 3000 pinhole SAXS system. An X-ray beam with a wavelength λ of 0.154 nm (Cu Kα) was obtained by using a copper rotating anode. The sample-to-detector distance was set to 1600 mm. A silver behenate standard sample was used to calibrate the relationship between pixel position and scattering vector q. PBDT aqueous solutions with specific concentrations were sealed in the same kind of capillary as introduced in XRD section. Ahead of the SAXS measurements, the capillaries were loaded with solution samples and placed axially along a 7.1 T magnetic field to achieve uniaxial alignment. During the SAXS experiments, the capillaries were placed horizontally in the SAXS sample chamber without a magnetic field. The SAXSGUI software package (Rigaku Innovative Technologies, Inc.) was used to generate the integrated SAXS intensity I(q) as a function of scattering vector q, where q = (4π sin θs)/λ and θs refers to one-half of the total scattering angle.

MD simulations

MD simulations were performed to investigate the self-assembly of two initially separated PBDT oligomers in aqueous solution. Two PBDT monomers, each with four repeating units and measuring ~6.8 nm in length, were initially placed side-by-side in a 6\(\times\)6\(\times\)10 nm3 simulation box. The simulation box was filled with 11,850 water molecules using the Packmol code51. Sixteen Na+ ions were included to ensure the electro-neutrality of the system. The simulation box was periodic in all three directions. The force field parameters for the PBDT polyanions were generated using the Swissparam server52. The TIP3P model was employed for the water molecules53. The force fields for the sodium ions were taken from the work by Joung and Cheatham54.

Simulations were performed using the MD code Gromacs 4.5 (ref. 50). First, an energy minimization was conducted using the steepest descent method, and the minimization was terminated when the maximal force in the system became smaller than 1000.0 kJ mol−1 nm−1. Next, a 120 ns equilibrium simulation was performed in the NPT ensemble using a time step size of 2 fs. The non-electrostatic interactions were computed via direct summation with a cut-off length of 1.2 nm. The electrostatic interactions were computed using the Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method55. The real space cut-off and FFT spacing were 1.2 and 0.12 nm, respectively. All bonds were constrained using the LINCS algorithm56. The system temperature was maintained at 300 K using the Nose-Hoover thermostat (time constant: 1 ps)57,58 and the pressure was maintained at 1 atm using the Parrinello-Rahman barostat (time constant: 10 ps)59,60. The trajectory was saved every 10 ps and analyzed using the tools provided by Gromacs.

Data availability

All relevant data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. In addition, MD simulation atom coordinate data (GROMACS gro format) and X-ray diffraction raw (img) datasets are available on the MaterialsCloud data archive, https://archive.materialscloud.org/2019.0005/v1. No data in this manuscript are restricted in terms of availability.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 171, 964–967 (1953).

  2. 2.

    Watson, J. D. & Crick, F. H. C. Molecular structure of nucleic acids—a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738 (1953).

  3. 3.

    Nakano, T. & Okamoto, Y. Synthetic helical polymers: conformation and function. Chem. Rev. 101, 4013–4038 (2001).

  4. 4.

    Reggelin, M., Doerr, S., Klussmann, M., Schultz, M. & Holbach, M. Helically chiral polymers: a class of ligands for asymmetric catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5461–5466 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Brodsky, B. & Ramshaw, J. A. M. The collagen triple-helix structure. Matrix Biol. 15, 545–554 (1997).

  6. 6.

    Maeda, T. et al. Double-stranded helical polymers consisting of complementary homopolymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7938–7945 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Sugimoto, T., Suzuki, T., Shinkai, S. & Sada, K. A double-stranded helix by complexation of two polymer chains with a helical supramolecular assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 270–271 (2007).

  8. 8.

    Tanaka, Y., Katagiri, H., Furusho, Y. & Yashima, E. A modular strategy to artificial double helices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3867–3870 (2005).

  9. 9.

    Luo, X. et al. Host–guest chirality interplay: a mutually induced formation of a chiral ZMOF and its double-helix polymer guests. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 786–789 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Berl, V., Huc, I., Khoury, R. G., Krische, M. J. & Lehn, J.-M. Interconversion of single and double helices formed from synthetic molecular strands. Nature 407, 720 (2000).

  11. 11.

    Zhao, D. et al. Molecular mechanism of self-assembly of aromatic oligoamides into interlocked double-helix foldamers. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 10064–10072 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Xia, Y. N. et al. A flexible bis(pyridylcarbamate) anion receptor: binding of infinite double-stranded phosphate, [-sulfate-(H2O)(2)-](n), and hydrogen-bridged helical perchlorate chain. Crystengcomm 11, 1849–1856 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Yashima, E. et al. Supramolecular helical systems: helical assemblies of small molecules, foldamers, and polymers with chiral amplification and their unctions. Chem. Rev. 116, 13752–13990 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Misra, R., Dey, S., Reja, R. M. & Gopi, H. N. Artificial β-double helices from achiral γ-peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1057–1061 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Bandyopadhyay, A., Malik, A., Kumar, M. G. & Gopi, H. N. Exploring β-hydroxy γ-amino acids (statines) in the design of hybrid peptide foldamers. Org. Lett. 16, 294–297 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Nielsen, P. E. Peptide nucleic acid. A molecule with two identities. Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 624–630 (1999).

  17. 17.

    Xiao, D.-R., Wang, E.-B., An, H.-Y., Li, Y.-G. & Xu, L. Syntheses and structures of three unprecedented metal−ciprofloxacin complexes with helical character. Cryst. Growth Des. 7, 506–512 (2007).

  18. 18.

    Shen, Y. M., Ma, N., Wu, L. L. & Song, H. H. Structural diversity of four 1D chain coordination polymers based on chiral N-tosyl-L-glutamic acid: effect of metal ions and N-donor ancillary ligands. Inorg. Chim. Acta 429, 51–60 (2015).

  19. 19.

    Zhang, Q. N. et al. Assembly of an unprecedented metal-pipemidic acid complex modifying octamolybdates containing like DNA spiral chain. Solid State Sci. 32, 20–25 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Huc, I. Aromatic oligoamide foldamers. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 17–29 (2004).

  21. 21.

    Jiang, H., Dolain, C., Léger, J.-M., Gornitzka, H. & Huc, I. Switching of chiral induction in helical aromatic oligoamides using solid state−solution state equilibrium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1034–1035 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Hiroki, I. et al. Double-stranded helical oligomers covalently bridged by rotary cyclic boronateesters. Chem. Asian J. 12, 927–935 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Urbanek, S., Tashiro, K., Kitayama, T. & Hatada, K. Crystallite modulus of double-stranded helices of isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate): the X-ray measurement and the theoretical calculation. Polymers (Guildf.). 40, 3345–3351 (1999).

  24. 24.

    Zhang, D. W., Wang, H. & Li, Z. T. in Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology Vol. 1 (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2017).

  25. 25.

    Zhang, D.-W., Zhao, X., Hou, J.-L. & Li, Z.-T. Aromatic amide foldamers: structures, properties, and functions. Chem. Rev. 112, 5271–5316 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Cao, J. et al. Preparation and helical folding of aromatic polyamides. Chem. Commun. 48, 11112–11114 (2012).

  27. 27.

    Yashima, E., Maeda, K., Iida, H., Furusho, Y. & Nagai, K. Helical polymers: synthesis, structures, and functions. Chem. Rev. 109, 6102–6211 (2009).

  28. 28.

    Goto, H., Katagiri, H., Furusho, Y. & Yashima, E. Oligoresorcinols fold into double helices in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 7176–7178 (2006).

  29. 29.

    Shang, J. et al. Self-association of aromatic oligoamide foldamers into double helices in water. Org. Lett. 16, 4992–4995 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Wu, Z. L. et al. Supramolecular assemblies of a semirigid polyanion in aqueous solutions. Macromolecules 46, 3581–3586 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Wu, Z. L., Kurokawa, T., Liang, S., Furukawa, H. & Gong, J. P. Hydrogels with cylindrically symmetric structure at macroscopic scale by self-assembly of semi-rigid polyion complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 10064–10069 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Yu, Z., He, Y. D., Wang, Y., Madsen, L. A. & Qiao, R. Molecular structure and ynamics of ionic liquids in a rigid-rod polyanion-based ion gel. Langmuir 33, 322–331 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Wang, Y. et al. Highly conductive and thermally stable ion gels with tunable anisotropy and modulus. Adv. Mater. 28, 2571–2578 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Wang, Y., Gao, J. W., Dingernans, T. J. & Madsen, L. A. Molecular alignment and ion transport in rigid rod polyelectrolyte solutions. Macromolecules 47, 2984–2992 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Gao, J. et al. Water and sodium transport and liquid crystalline alignment in a sulfonated aramid membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 489, 194–203 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Franklin, R. E. & Gosling, R. G. Evidence for 2-chain helix in crystalline structure of sodium deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172, 156–157 (1953).

  37. 37.

    Samulski, E. T. in Physical Properties of Polymers ACS Professional Reference Book (ed. Mark, J. E.) Ch. 5, 201–264 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).

  38. 38.

    Onsager, L. The effects of shape on the interaction of colloidal particles. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 51, 627–659 (1949).

  39. 39.

    Flory, P. J. Phase equilibria in solutions of rod-like particles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 234, 73–89 (1956).

  40. 40.

    Gross, P. et al. Quantifying how DNA stretches, melts and changes twist under tension. Nat. Phys. 7, 731 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Vesentini, S., Redaelli, A. & Gautieri, A. Nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 3, 23–34 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Tsuji, K., Ohe, H. & Watanabe, H. Stability of the PBLG helix at high temperature and the wormlike character of the helix. Polym. J. 4, 553–559 (1973).

  43. 43.

    Harford, J. & Squire, J. Time-resolved diffraction studies of muscle using synchrotron radiation. Rep. Progress Phys. 60, 1723–1787 (1997).

  44. 44.

    KnuppC. & Squire, J. M. HELIX: a helical diffraction simulation program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 832–835 (2004).

  45. 45.

    Strzelecka, T. E. & Rill, R. L. Na-23 Nmr of concentrated DNA solutions—salt concentration and temperature effects. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7796–7807 (1992).

  46. 46.

    Strzelecka, T. E. & Rill, R. L. A Na-23-Nmr study of sodium DNA interactions in concentrated DNA solutions at low-supporting electrolyte concentration. Biopolymers 30, 803–814 (1990).

  47. 47.

    Levitt, M. H. Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001).

  48. 48.

    Li, J., Park, J. K., Moore, R. B. & Madsen, L. A. Linear coupling of alignment with transport in a polymer electrolyte membrane. Nat. Mater. 10, 507–511 (2011).

  49. 49.

    Li, J., Wilmsmeyer, K. G. & Madsen, L. A. Anisotropic diffusion and morphology in perfluorosulfonate ionomers investigated by NMR. Macromolecules 42, 255–262 (2009).

  50. 50.

    Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).

  51. 51.

    Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G. & Martínez, J. M. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).

  52. 52.

    Zoete, V., Cuendet, M. A., Grosdidier, A. & Michielin, O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2359–2368 (2011).

  53. 53.

    Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).

  54. 54.

    Joung, I. S., Cheatham, I. I. I. & T. E. Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 9020–9041 (2008).

  55. 55.

    Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).

  56. 56.

    Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. & Fraaije, J. G. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).

  57. 57.

    Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Mol. Phys. 52, 255–268 (1984).

  58. 58.

    Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).

  59. 59.

    Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).

  60. 60.

    Nosé, S. & Klein, M. Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Mol. Phys. 50, 1055–1076 (1983).

Download references


The authors wish to thank Professors Dimitri Ivanov and Edward T. Samulski for helpful discussions. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under award numbers DMR 1507764, 1810194, and 1507245. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation (NSF). This work was also supported in part by the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) and the Open Access Subvention Fund (OASF) at Virginia Tech.

Author information


  1. Department of Chemistry and Macromolecules Innovation Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    • Ying Wang
    • , Carla Slebodnick
    • , Gregory B. Fahs
    • , Curt J. Zanelotti
    • , Robert B. Moore
    •  & Louis A. Madsen
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    • Yadong He
    • , Zhou Yu
    •  & Rui Qiao
  3. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS, Delft, The Netherlands

    • Jianwei Gao
    • , Maruti Hegde
    •  & Theo J. Dingemans
  4. Van’t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    • Stephanie ten Brinck
    •  & Bernd Ensing
  5. Department of Applied Physical Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 121 South Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3050, USA

    • Maruti Hegde
    •  & Theo J. Dingemans


  1. Search for Ying Wang in:

  2. Search for Yadong He in:

  3. Search for Zhou Yu in:

  4. Search for Jianwei Gao in:

  5. Search for Stephanie ten Brinck in:

  6. Search for Carla Slebodnick in:

  7. Search for Gregory B. Fahs in:

  8. Search for Curt J. Zanelotti in:

  9. Search for Maruti Hegde in:

  10. Search for Robert B. Moore in:

  11. Search for Bernd Ensing in:

  12. Search for Theo J. Dingemans in:

  13. Search for Rui Qiao in:

  14. Search for Louis A. Madsen in:


Y.W., C.S., G.B.F. and R.B.M. designed and conducted X-ray experiments and simulations. Y.W., C.J.Z. and L.A.M. conducted NMR experiments and developed related models. J.G. and M.H. synthesized the materials. S.T.B. and B.E. conducted MD simulations in vacuum. Y.H., Z.Y. and R. Q. conducted MD simulations in water. Y.W. and L.A.M. developed and compiled concepts and wrote the main paper. Y.H., Z.Y., J.G., S.T.B., C.S., G.B.F., C.J.Z., M.H., R.B.M, B.E., T.J.D. and R.Q. assisted with compiling and editing the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui Qiao or Louis A. Madsen.

Supplementary information

Source Data

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date




By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.