Abstract
Flexible metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are structurally flexible, porous, crystalline solids that show a structural transition in response to a stimulus. If MOF-based solid-state and microelectronic devices are to be capable of leveraging such structural flexibility, then the integration of MOF thin films into a device configuration is crucial. Here we report the targeted and precise anchoring of Cu-based alkylether-functionalised layered-pillared MOF crystallites onto substrates via stepwise liquid-phase epitaxy. The structural transformation during methanol sorption is monitored by in-situ grazing incidence X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, spatially-controlled anchoring of the flexible MOFs on the surface induces a distinct structural responsiveness which is different from the bulk powder and can be systematically controlled by varying the crystallite characteristics, for instance dimensions and orientation. This fundamental understanding of thin-film flexibility is of paramount importance for the rational design of MOF-based devices utilising the structural flexibility in specific applications such as selective sensors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Flexible materials are intriguing for the development of novel composites, due to their responsiveness to specific stimuli by undergoing structural transformation1,2,3,4,5. For centuries, the potential utility of biological flexible materials has been perceived. Leonardo da Vinci produced the first hygrometer by employing the expansion/contraction of human hair upon ad- and de-sorption of moisture6. More advanced responsiveness has been observed in biomimetic and organic materials such as enzymes, biomolecules and stimuli-responsive polymers. These materials can change their conformation in response to external stimuli and adapt their structures to surrounding environments. Consequently, they can transduce chemical and biological signals into optical, electrical and mechanical signals leading to various applications such as smart optics, biosensors and electromechanical systems5. Even though flexibility is quite common in elastic polymers, creating flexible, crystalline solid-state materials remains a challenge, since their long-range compositional ordering may prevent spatial rearrangement. Only few examples of zeolites show some structural adaptivity in response to high-pressure compression, however still depending on the hydrostatic pressure-transmitting media7,8. However, recently, structural changes in elastic crystals of copper(II) acetylacetonate during mechanical stress have been reported9.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a promising class of porous, crystalline materials, formed by the combination of metal ions or clusters and multitopic organic linkers, which allows to integrate flexibility and responsivity into rigid, crystalline structures10. Due to the versatility of precursor building blocks and the possibility for chemical functionalisation of coordination space, MOFs offer a broad perspective for rationally designing and fine tuning their structure, characteristic features and chemical properties of the pore surface11,12,13,14. The specific design of MOF components to control attractive forces used for assembling the porous scaffolds can initiate structural dynamics in some MOFs (named flexible MOFs or soft porous crystals (SPCs))10,15,16,17,18. Depending on their characteristic features, SPCs can undergo reversible phase transitions in various flexible modes (i.e., breathing19, swelling20, ligand rotation21, subnetwork displacement22,23) upon external stimuli such as guest sorption, temperature change, light and mechanical pressure15,16. The discovery of highly-responsive MOFs highlights the potential applications for selective gas storage24,25,26, effective gas separation27, controlled drug release28 and also smart sensors29.
The so-called breathing transition in MOFs has been extensively studied for the prototypical class of M(bdc)(OH) frameworks (MIL-53, MIL = Materiaux Institute Lavoisier; M3+ = Al3+, Fe3+, Cr3+, Sc3+, Ga3+, and In3+; bdc2− = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate). These frameworks are built up by one dimensional M–OH–M chains bridged by bdc2- ligands and typically undergo (in the case of M = Al3+, Cr3+, Ga3+) a large pore (lp) to narrow pore (np) phase transition upon guest adsorption in the activated (i.e., solvent free) state19,30. However, the utilisation of different metal centres (i.e., Fe3+, Sc3+)31,32 and bdc2− derivatives featuring functional groups33 modifies the breathing effect substantially. These transitions are usually identified and analysed by X-ray diffraction techniques (in-situ and ex-situ) but are also indicated by steps in the adsorption isotherm16. Apart from MIL-53, layered-pillared MOFs (M2L2P; M = metal ion centre; L = linear dicarboxylate linker; P = neutral nitrogen donor pillar) show under particular circumstances breathing transition. The prototypic Zn2(bdc)2(dabco) (dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) consists of a square-grid Zn2(bdc)2 lattices featuring Zn2 paddlewheels, bridged by dabco pillars along the axial position of the paddlewheel. This material reveals small structural transition upon adsorption of certain guest molecules (i.e., DMF and benzene) due to the deformation of the paddle-wheel Zn2(bdc)2 grids when interacting with the guests34, however, if isopropanol is adsorbed inside the structure, a considerable breathing transition is observed35. Along these lines, functionalisation of the dicarboxylate linkers can introduce and even tailor the substantial responsiveness36,37. We illustrated in our previous works that the incorporation of alkylether-functionalised bdc linkers in Zn2(fu-bdc)2(dabco) compounds (fu-bdc = 2,5-alkoxy-functionalised-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) induces a breathing effect upon polar guest sorption37 and temperature change38. The dynamic breathing phenomenon between the guest-filled lp form and the guest-free np form can be finely tuned by changing the characteristics of the pendant groups37, and recently also by the choices of metal nodes39. Moreover, mixing of different metal nodes or different linkers is another strategy to tune the structural responsiveness40.
In addition to modifying the MOF composition, controlling their mesoscopic physical form such as crystal size and morphology is known to uniquely affect their properties41. Downsizing of flexible MOF crystallites to the nanoscale regime can alter their adsorption profiles and even generate new intrinsic features differing from the bulk MOFs42,43,44,45. For example, the bulk form of the Cu2(bdc)2(bipy) compound (bipy = 4,4′-bipyridine) shows an opened-pore (op) to closed-pore (cp) structural transition upon guest desorption, while the nanocrystalline form (<60 nm) remains in the op after guest removal. Transformation to the cp form is only achieved by thermal treatment43. Moreover, DUT-8(Ni) (Ni2(ndc)2(dabco); ndc2− = 2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate) also exhibits size-dependent framework flexibility upon guest sorption44. Small DUT-8(Ni) crystals (<500 nm) retain the op after activation, whereas larger DUT-8(Ni) crystals (>1 µm) undergo the op-to-cp breathing transition after thermal activation44.
The implementation of MOFs into thin films has received increasing attention over the last few years46,47, since it is imperative for the advancement of MOF-based devices. Key challenges in their fabrication are the ability to engineer and enhance characteristic MOF features at the nanoscale, and to spatially control crystallisation processes to be compatible with device configurations46,47,48. Among various methods, stepwise liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE) is beneficial for the formation of homogeneous MOF thin films with controllable thickness. Moreover, the crystallite orientation can be controlled within the LPE process by varying the surface functionality (e.g., by using self-assembled monolayers (SAM) of organothiols featuring different terminal-groups)49. This method is driven by the alternating immersion of a substrate into solutions containing individual MOF precursor components49,50. Even though various MOFs with rigid structures have been fabricated as thin films, studies on flexible MOF thin films remain scarce. The first attempt was the preparation of a Fe3O(H2O)2X(bdc)3 (X = F− or OH−; MIL-88B(Fe)) film by solvothermal synthesis on a SAM-functionalised Au-coated substrate. This micrometre-sized crystalline film exhibits framework swelling induced by moisture adsorption in a similar manner to the bulk MIL-88B crystal51. Kitagawa and co-workers employed the LPE method to fabricate nanometre-thick interdigitated Hofmann-type MOF thin films, which compellingly exhibit unique structural motifs which influence the adsorption profiles as compared to the bulk MOFs52,53. Remarkably, downsizing of the non-porous Fe(py)2[Pt(CN)4] (py = pyridine) to a thin film of 16 nanometres thickness initiates a gate-opening structural transformation (cp-to-op) induced by the lower potential energy barrier53. At the nanoscale, guests can diffuse in between neighbouring interdigitated layers and move them apart. Increasing the film thickness above a certain threshold leads to a suppression of the flexibility as observed for the bulk material53.
In depth understanding of the structural responsiveness and other emerging effects when anchoring flexible MOF crystallites onto substrates is necessary to facilitate the development of flexible MOF-based devices such as highly-selective sensors. Herein, we describe the fabrication of alkylether-functionalised Cu2(DE-bdc)2(dabco) (1) and its analogue Cu2(BME-bdc)2(dabco) (2) as thin films (DE-bdc = 2,5-diethoxy-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate and BME-bdc = 2,5-bis(2-methoxyethoxy)−1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) on SAM-functionalised Au-coated quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) sensors. The growth behaviours and the adsorption profiles are investigated by tracking the QCM frequency change, which is proportional to the mass change based on the Sauerbrey Equation. A study of guest-induced structural flexibility of the thin-films in comparison with the bulk MOFs is performed by in-situ synchrotron grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) during guest adsorption by a custom-built, semi-quantitative vapour adsorption unit (Supplementary Fig. 4). Notably, unique and different structural responsiveness upon methanol sorption in the thin films is observed. This highlights not only the striking effect of anchoring the flexible MOF crystallites onto the substrate surface, but also the marked dependence on the number of LPE deposition cycles (i.e., film thickness) (Fig. 1).
Results
Structural flexibility of bulk powders
Polycrystalline powder of 1 (1bulk) was synthesised and characterised to establish a benchmark data set for comparison of the structural flexibility of 1 in bulk and as a thin film. 1bulk was prepared by solvothermal reaction of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O with H2DE-bdc and dabco (Fig. 2a) in DMF at 120 °C for 48 h. Upon activation in vacuo overnight at 130 °C, 1bulk undergoes a structural transformation from the solvated, lp form to the guest-free, np form. After solvent removal from the pore of 1bulk, the neighbouring alkylether-functionalised sidechains can interact with each other. Referring to the literatures37,39, single crystal XRD was used to identify the structural evidence of the as-synthesised (solvated) form of Zn-based alkoxyether-functionalised layered-pillared MOFs and Pawley refinements were used to identify the change of lattice parameters with respect to the breathing phenomena upon guest adsorption and desorption. This refinement indicated the wine rack-like motion which changes the square M2(fu-bdc)2 grids in the solvated, lp form into rhombic grids in the activated, np form, while the dabco-containing axis remains mostly constant (Supplementary Fig. 5). Herein, we performed Pawley refinements of the lattice parameters of the MeOH-solvated and activated forms of 1bulk and 2bulk from their GIXRD patterns (using synchrotron X-ray radiation with a wavelength of 0.827 Å). (Supplementary Figs. 5 and 7, Supplementary Table 1). In good agreement with the literature, we observe from the Pawley refinements that 1bulk (as well as 2bulk) shows an increase of lattice parameter a and a decrease of lattice parameter b, while lattice parameter c remains constant upon MeOH desolvation. Consequently, these changes of the unit cell parameters lead to a reduction of the total unit cell volume, indicating the guest induced breathing transition (from the solvated, lp form to the activated, np form)37,39. These evidences confirm the structural transition of the copper-based materials 1bulk and 2bulk in a similar manner to their zinc analogues, as well as their thin-films during the sorption of methanol.
We further investigated the structural flexibility of 1bulk as a response to polar-guest sorption (herein, methanol vapour) at ambient temperature by in-situ GIXRD. According to the GIXRD patterns (Fig. 2b), adsorption of methanol at relative vapour pressure (P/P0) of 10% in a dynamic He stream (blue line plots of GIXRD patterns) initiates the breathing transition in 1bulk from the activated, np form (the main diffraction peak is highlighted with a yellow bar) to the solvated, lp form (highlighted with a green bar). A complete transformation towards the lp form occurs after the relative vapour pressure of the methanol stream is increased to 20% P/P0. Purging the MeOH-solvated 1bulk with dry He gas at 25 °C desorbs methanol and the initial np phase is regained (wine-colour line plots of GIXRD patterns). In addition, polycrystalline powder of 2 (2bulk) exhibits a similar trend of the structural flexibility upon methanol sorption at 25 °C, even though the change of the refined lattice parameters is different (Supplementary Fig. 10). This observation illustrates a way to modulate the structural responsiveness in MOFs even at room temperature by varying size and functionality of the pendent sidechains, which can interact with the guest molecules37.
Fabrication of MOF thin-films and their crystallinity
Aiming for high-performance MOF-based devices, we herein focus on the implementation of structural flexibility into MOF thin films onto QCM sensors. A stepwise LPE process is used for the fabrication of 1 and 2 thin films with varying deposition cycles, hereafter named as 1tfx and 2tfx (x = number of deposition cycles). In the LPE process, solutions of Cu(OAc)2 and the mixed organic linkers are alternatingly dosed to the —COOH terminated SAM-functionalised QCM substrate in a continuous flow reactor for 40, 60, 80 and 120 cycles. Importantly, each precursor dosing step is followed by flushing of the reactor cell with ethanol. The applied LPE procedure is schematically shown in Fig. 3a. The deposition onto a QCM substrate allows for measurements of the change of QCM oscillator frequency and in turn in-situ investigation of the film growth is possible. We observe an effective control of the deposited sample mass on the substrate as a function of deposition cycles, which implies stepwise construction of the MOF crystallites (Fig. 3b). A closer inspection of the QCM frequency change confirms saturation during each deposition step of the metal and the mixed organic linkers, which reflect a self-terminated growth of the layered-pillared MOF thin films (Supplementary Fig. 11).
Considering the LPE growth of 1tfx on the —COOH terminated QCM substrates, the as-synthesised thin films exhibit a high crystallinity with a preferred orientation along the (110) plane of the solvated, lp form (black line plots of the out-of-plane GIXRD patterns illustrated in Fig. 4), referring to the Zn-based analogous structure reported in the literature37 and the refined lattice parameters of 1bulk in Supplementary Fig. 6. According to these results, the Cu2(DE-bdc)2 grids in 1tfx, which can exhibit a wine rack-like motion during the breathing phenomenon, are oriented orthogonally to the substrate surface. Moreover, crystallite sizes were calculated using the Scherrer equation from the GIXRD patterns of MeOH-solvated 1tfx samples (see Supplementary Fig. 12). There is no significant difference of the calculated crystallite size of 1tfx samples. Note that, Scherrer equation is not applicable for particles with a size larger than about 100 or 200 nm. Considering the particle size within the 1tfx samples (see SEM images discussed in detail in the following section), the observed particle sizes range within the sub-micrometres scale. Hence, the calculated crystallite sizes of 1tfx based on the Scherrer equation could be highly deviated from the actual size. Therefore, they cannot be properly used to identify the size difference of the obtained 1tfx samples and consequently the effect on structural flexibility of the samples reported herein.
Structural flexibility upon methanol sorption of MOF thin-films
In order to examine the structural responsiveness of 1tfx in comparison to 1bulk and understand the influence of the crystallite dimension on the framework flexibility, GIXRD patterns are recorded during dynamic methanol adsorption at 25 °C. Herein, the structural response of 1tfx are studied during 4 different stages of the methanol sorption process: (1) the as-synthesised, solvated stage, (2) the activation procedure by purging with dry He gas (transformation from solvated to guest-free (activated) state), (3) the methanol adsorption at various P/P0 (incremental transformation from guest-free to solvated state), and (4) the desorption process (solvated back to guest-free state). The responsiveness of 1tfx crystallites is investigated using out-of-plane and in-plane GIXRD profiles.
The out-of-plane GIXRD profiles of 1tfx (on —COOH functionalised QCM substrates, Fig. 4) show a significantly different structural responsiveness upon methanol sorption compared to 1bulk. Moreover, we observe a dependency of the structural flexibility on the total number of LPE fabrication cycles. The crystallites in 1tf40 remain in the lp form regardless of the treatments (Fig. 4a and Fig. 5a). We attribute this to the strong chemical binding of the MOF crystallites and the SAM-functionalised surface. This strong surface interaction within 1tf40 presumably inhibits the lp-to-np transformation, either because the strain caused by the structural transformation at the interface cannot be compensated by the beneficial side chain-side chain interactions of the np form or it is a size effect as observed in the work of Kitagawa and co-workers on Cu2(bdc)2(bipy)43.
Contrary, 1tf60, 1tf80 and 1tf120 exhibit a structural transformation upon methanol sorption demonstrated by a marked change of the GIXRD patterns. Specifically, the films change from the solvated, lp form to a mixture of both lp and np forms after activation by purging the samples with He gas (red plots, Figs. 4b–d). Upon activation, on one hand, the crystallite domains anchored closely to the substrate surface still remain in the guest-free, lp form due to the restricted framework flexibility as observed for 1tf40. On the other hand, the crystallite domains at a higher distance to the surface, which have less interaction to the substrate, can undergo a breathing transformation and then change from the solvated, lp form to the guest-free, np form (Fig. 5b). Notably, adsorption of 10% P/P0 methanol into the larger-dimension 1tf films cannot initiate the framework transition towards the solvated, lp form as observed for 1bulk (blue plots, Figs. 4b–d). Methanol with a P/P0 of at least 20% (orange, green and purple plots, Figs. 4b–d) is required to trigger the structural flexibility, highlighting the unique effect of anchoring flexible MOFs onto a surface (Fig. 5b). These observations emphasise that the observed lp and np forms in activated 1tf60, 1tf80 and 1tf120 are not a mixture of two different forms of the activated, np 1bulk deposited on top of the activated lp 1tf (see Supplementary Fig. 13). The framework flexibility in 1tf is reversible by purging with He, showing the transformation back to the activated stage consisting of both lp and np forms.
Top-view scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Supplementary Figs. 15 and 16) show the cubic MOF crystal particles within the 1tfx samples (in the lateral dimensions in parallel to the substrate). Analysis of crystal particle size distribution (Supplementary Fig. 17) indicates that 1tf40 has significantly smaller particle size (80% of particle size distribution ranging within 100–300 nm with an average size of about 200 nm) than 1tf60, 1tf80 and 1tf120 (80% of particle size distribution ranging within 250–650 nm with an average size of about 400 nm). Moreover, cross-sectional SEM images (Supplementary Fig. 18) also reveal a significant difference of the film thickness of 1tf40 (430 nm) from 1tf60 (740 nm), 1tf80 (840 nm) and 1tf120 (1000 nm). On the same area of QCM sensors, anchoring of the smaller crystal particles on the substrate (1tf40) may show a significant influence of the surface interaction over the whole particles. This consequence leads to a higher activation barrier for the framework breathing in 1tf40 and hence all the crystallite domains remain in the lp form even in the activated, guest-free condition. Unlike 1tf40, the crystallite domains which are less affected by the surface interaction within the thicker 1tf60, 1tf80 and 1tf120 films consisting of larger particles can undergo the guest-induced framework transition.
Additionally, methanol adsorption isotherms measured at 25 °C on an environmentally controlled QCM indicate different adsorption profiles within the 1tfx series (Fig. 6). A marked difference of the isotherm shape can clearly be identified. Specifically, 1tf40 exhibits a single-step methanol adsorption signalling the presence of only the lp form after activation due to a restriction of the framework flexibility. In contrast, 1tf60, 1tf80 and 1tf120 show two-step adsorption profiles, which are typically indicative of a guest-induced phase transition. The first step (P/P0 from 0 to 0.15) is attributed to the adsorption of methanol into both the existing lp and np forms of the activated samples, without inducing the framework transformation. A rapid increase of the adsorbed methanol amount at P/P0 of 0.15 indicates the threshold pressure that initiates the np-to-lp frameworks transition, leading to a further increase of the amount adsorbed. At high P/P0, all the 1tfx samples show nearly-identical adsorption values (of approximately 7.5 mmol of methanol per gram of MOF), since all the crystallites are solely presented in the lp form. This observation also reveals the similar accessibility of the pores of the fabricated 1tfx samples, which is independent of the thickness (crystallite dimension) of the thin-films. Note that, all the 1tfx samples rather show a single-step desorption profile (Supplementary Fig. 19).
For additional investigations, we fabricated 1tf on pyridyl-terminated SAM-functionalised QCM substrates by employing LPE deposition for 60 cycles (named as 1tf60-Py). 1tf60-Py exhibits preferred growth along the (001)-plane of the framework, along the dabco ligand37. Unlike 1tf60, GIXRD profiles during methanol sorption of 1tf60-Py (Supplementary Fig. 20) present only the lp form in all sorption treatments. Moreover, 1tf60-Py exhibits a single-step methanol adsorption isotherm (Supplementary Fig. 21), with a small deviation from the typical type-I adsorption isotherm at P/P0 of 0.15. This implies the possibility of partial flexibility, however there is no phase transition observed in the GIXRD. It strongly points towards that the breathing is more restricted in 1tf60-Py than in 1tf60. In 1tf60-Py, the whole Cu2(DE-bdc)2 grids are fixed parallel to the surface. The wine rack-like movement during the breathing transition would considerably affect the anchoring, disturbing the orientation of the SAM or putting a lot of stress on the interface. Hence we believe that the energy penalty caused at the interface cannot be compensated by the beneficial side chain-side chain and side chain-metal centre interactions of the np state. In other words, the flexibility is inhibited if the growth direction of 1tf is changed. Notably, the guest-induced structural flexibility of 1tf depends not only on the crystallite dimension but also on the orientation of the crystallites anchored on the surface.
Furthermore, LPE is used for fabrication of 2tf60, 2tf80 and 2tf120 on the —COOH functionalised QCM substrates. According to in-situ GIXRD profiles (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24), the 2tfx materials also exhibit structural responsiveness upon methanol sorption in a similar manner to the 1tfx materials, which clearly indicates the guest-induced framework transition in related alkylether-functionalised MOF thin-films. In contrast, the pristine Cu2(bdc)2(dabco) (3) thin film fabricated by LPE for 60 cycles (3tf60) does not show any structural reorganisation upon methanol sorption (Supplementary Fig. 25). This further emphasises that the alkylether pendent side chains are necessary for inducing structural flexibility upon polar-guest sorption into the Cu-based layered-pillared MOFs, as well as their thin-films.
Discussion
We employed for the first time the stepwise LPE process to anchor a nanolayer of flexible layered-pillared MOF crystallites onto SAM-functionalised QCM substrates. Variation of the SAM-functionalised surface and the total number of fabrication cycles controls the crystallite orientation and dimension (and/or thickness) of the thin-films, as shown in previous works. Remarkably, the crystallite dimensions have a distinct effect on the structural dynamics. While the flexibility is inhibited for very thin films (40 deposition cycles), thicker films (60–120 deposition cycles) show a lp-to-np phase transition upon polar-guest desorption which is reversible upon re-adsorption. Additionally, the orientation of the film has a crucial impact on the transition, while samples grown along the (110) lattice plane show structural dynamics, these are inhibited for MOFs grown along the (001) lattice plane. We attribute the restriction of structural flexibility to the strong interaction between the crystallites and the SAM-functionalised substrate leading to a higher activation barrier for initiating the flexibility (such as in the low crystallite-dimension 1tf40 and the (001)-oriented 1tf60-Py). The breathing transformation occurs in the crystallite domains further away from the substrate interface, as the influence of the interface gets less pronounced. However, the effect of anchoring the flexible MOF crystallites onto the surface leads to increased threshold vapour pressures of methanol for initiating the np-to-lp transformation with respect to the bulk samples. In all, we provide a toolkit for the targeted preparation of MOF thin films with adjustable framework flexibility and demonstrate the fundamental understanding of breathing transitions within MOF thin films. The findings at hand are of relevant interest for specific applications such as MOF-thin film based sensors. A further extension towards well-controlled crystallite orientation54,55,56 and a combination of various responsivities by means of heterostructured architectures57,58 is currently under development for the preparation of multiple-stimuli-responsive MOF-based devices.
Methods
MOF thin-film fabrication
Au-coated QCM sensors (Q-Sense, Au electrode, diameter 14 mm, thickness 0.3 mm and fundamental frequency ca. 4.95 MHz) were used as substrates. Prior to the thin-film fabrication, the substrates were immersed in 20 μM solution of 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid (MHDA) in ethanol mixed with 5% v/v acetic acid for 24 h to generate a —COOH terminated surface. In order to generate a —pyridyl terminated surface, a 20 μM solution of 4-(4-pyridyl)phenylmethylthiol (PMBT) in ethanol was used instead of the MHDA solution. 1tfx and 2tfx (x = 40, 60, 80 and 120 cycles) were fabricated by the LPE process at controlled temperatures of 40 °C using an automated QCM instrument (Q-Sense E4 Auto) operated in the continuous flow mode with a constant flow rate of 100 μL min−1. In each deposition cycle, the —COOH terminated QCM substrate was alternatingly exposed to the precursor solutions as follow: Cu(OAc)2·H2O (0.5 mM in ethanol) 10 min, ethanol 5 min, the mixed organic linkers (H2DE-bdc + dabco for 1tfx and H2BME-bdc + dabco for 2tfx, 0.2 mM in ethanol) 10 min, and finally ethanol 5 min. During the fabrication, the QCM frequency change was monitored in-situ. In addition, 1tf was also prepared on the —pyridyl terminated QCM by LPE for 60 cycles (1tf60-Py) in order to study the influence of crystallite orientation on the structural responsiveness of the MOF films. For comparison, the parent Cu2(bdc)2(dabco) thin film was also prepared by LPE for 60 cycles (3tf60).
In-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction during methanol adsorption
Crystalline phase and structural flexibility during methanol sorption of the MOF powders and thin-films were identified by GIXRD (Beamline BL9 of the DELTA synchrotron radiation source, Dortmund, Germany. An X-Ray energy of 15.0 keV corresponding to a wavelength of 0.827 Å was used. The angle of incidence was 0.6°)59. In order to investigate the structural flexibility induced by polar-guest (i.e., methanol) sorption at ambient temperature (25 °C), the sample stage was equipped with a heatable graphite dome-type unit (DHS 1100, Anton Paar). This sample stage was further connected with the custom-built He gas flow system, which could semi-quantitatively control the dosing amount of methanol vapour into the sample chamber. The MOF sample was placed in the sample chamber and covered with the graphite dome. The temperature of the sample chamber was controlled at 25 °C during the whole experiment. In-situ GIXRD patterns were recorded in different stages of the methanol sorption process as follows: (1) the as-synthesised, solvated stage (mimicking by drop methanol to the sample); (2) the activation (by purging the sample with He gas); (3) the methanol adsorption with 10, 20, 50 and 80% P/P0; and (4) the desorption (by purging with He gas flow). To control the P/P0, the pressure-controlled valves at the pure He gas line and the one that passed through the methanol vaporiser were adjusted to change the mixing ratio, while keeping the total pressure at the end point behind the sample chamber constant (the schematic setup is shown in Supplementary Fig. 4).
Characterisation of MOF thin-films
Surface morphology and surface coverage were investigated by a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, ZEISS Gemini Sigma 300 VP). Cross-sectional SEM images were measured by a JEOL JSM-7500F operated in Gentle Beam mode without sputtering in order to determine the film thickness. Sorption properties of the MOF films were carried out on an environmental-controlled QCM (BEL-QCM-4 instrument, MicrotracBEL Corp.) at controlled temperature of 25 °C using methanol as probe molecules. Prior to the sorption measurements, the films were activated in-situ within the BEL-QCM instrument by purging with a dry He gas with a flow rate of 100 sccm for 2 h until the change of QCM frequency was stable within the range of ±5 Hz in 20 min. Then the mass of the MOF film was recorded by a conversion of the difference between the QCM frequency at the final activation and the fundamental frequency of the SAM-functionalised QCM substrates according to Sauerbrey’s equation. After that, methanol sorption isotherms at 25 °C were collected by varying P/P0 of saturated methanol vapour in He gas flow from 0.0 to 95.0%.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information file, which is available in the online version of the paper. Correspondence and requests should be addressed to R.A.F.
References
Hilf, R. J. C. & Dutzler, R. Structure of a potentially open state of a proton-activated pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. Nature 457, 115–118 (2009).
Smith, D. E., Babcock, H. P. & Chu, S. Single-polymer dynamics in steady shear flow. Science 283, 1724–1727 (1999).
Ichimura, K., Oh, S.-K. & Nakagawa, M. Light-driven motion of liquids on a photoresponsive surface. Science 288, 1624–1626 (2000).
Berná, J. et al. Macroscopic transport by synthetic molecular machines. Nat. Mater. 4, 704–710 (2005).
Cohen Stuart, M. A. et al. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat. Mater. 9, 101–113 (2010).
Draper, J. W. A. Text-book on Chemistry. p. 55 (Harper & Brothers Publisher, New York, 1861).
Hazen, R. M. & Finger, L. W. Compressibility of zeolite 4A is dependent on the molecular size of the hydrostatic pressure medium. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 1838–1840 (1984).
Colligan, M. et al. Synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction and computational investigation of purely siliceous zeolite Y under pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 12015–12022 (2004).
Worthy, A. et al. Atomic resolution of structural changes in elastic crystals of copper(II) acetylacetonate. Nat. Chem. 10, 65–69 (2018).
Horike, S., Shimomura, S. & Kitagawa, S. Soft porous crystals. Nat. Chem. 1, 695–704 (2009).
Li, H., Eddaoudi, M. & Yaghi, O. M. Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 402, 276–279 (1999).
Yaghi, O. M. et al. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423, 705–714 (2004).
Kitagawa, S., Kitaura, R. & Noro, S.-i Functional porous coordination polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2334–2375 (2004).
Férey, G. Hybrid porous solids: past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 191–214 (2008).
Murdock, C. R., Hughes, B. C., Lu, Z. & Jenkins, D. M. Approaches for synthesizing breathing MOFs by exploiting dimensional rigidity. Coord. Chem. Rev. 258-259, 119–136 (2014).
Schneemann, A. et al. Flexible metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6062–6096 (2014).
Morris, R. E. & Brammer, L. Coordination change, lability and hemilability in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5444–5462 (2017).
Krause, S. et al. A pressure-amplifying framework material with negative gas adsorption transitions. Nature 532, 348–352 (2016).
Serre, C. et al. Very large breathing effect in the first nanoporous chromium(III)-based solids: MIL-53 or CrIII(OH)•{O2C-C6H4-CO2}•{HO2C-C6H4-CO2H}x•H2Oy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 13519–13526 (2002).
Mellot-Draznieks, C., Serre, C., Surblé, S., Audebrand, N. & Férey, G. Very large swelling in hybrid frameworks: a combined computational and powder diffraction study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 16273–16278 (2005).
Seo, J., Matsuda, R., Sakamoto, H., Bonneau, C. & Kitagawa, S. A pillared-layer coordination polymer with a rotatable pillar acting as a molecular gate for guest molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12792–12800 (2009).
Maji, T. K., Matsuda, R. & Kitagawa, S. A flexible interpenetrating coordination framework with a bimodal porous functionality. Nat. Mater. 6, 142–148 (2007).
Kitaura, R., Seki, K., Akiyama, G. & Kitagawa, S. Porous coordination-polymer crystals with gated channels specific for supercritical gases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 428–431 (2003).
Yang, S. et al. A partially interpenetrated metal–organic framework for selective hysteretic sorption of carbon dioxide. Nat. Mater. 11, 710–716 (2012).
Chandler, B. D. et al. Mechanical gas capture and release in a network solid via multiple single-crystalline transformations. Nat. Mater. 7, 229–235 (2008).
Mason, J. A. et al. Methane storage in flexible metal–organic frameworks with intrinsic thermal management. Nature 527, 357–361 (2015).
Carrington, E. J. et al. Solvent-switchable continuous-breathing behavior in a diamondoid metal–organic framework and its influence on CO2 versus CH4 selectivity. Nat. Chem. 9, 882–889 (2017).
Horcajada, P. et al. Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat. Mater. 9, 172–178 (2010).
Yanai, N. et al. Gas detection by structural variations of fluorescent guest molecules in a flexible porous coordination polymer. Nat. Mater. 10, 787–793 (2011).
Loiseau, T. et al. A rationale for the large breathing of the porous aluminium terephthalate (MIL-53) upon hydration. Chem. Eur. J. 10, 1373–1382 (2004).
Millange, F. et al. Effect of the nature of the metal on the breathing steps in MOFs with dynamic frameworks. Chem. Commun. 39, 4732–4734 (2008).
Mowat, J. P. S. et al. A novel structural form of MIL-53 observed for the scandium analogue and its response to temperature variation and CO2 adsorption. Dalton Trans. 41, 3937–3941 (2012).
Devic, T. et al. Functionalization in flexible porous solids: effects on the pore opening and the host-guest interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1127–1136 (2010).
Dybtsev, D. N., Chun, H. & Kim, K. Rigid and flexible: a highly porous metal–organic framework with unusual guest-dependent dynamic behavior. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5033–5036 (2004).
Uemura, K., Yamasaki, Y., Komagawa, Y., Tanaka, K. & Kita, H. Two-step adsorption/desorption on a jungle-gym-type porous coordination polymer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6662–6665 (2007).
Wang, Z. & Cohen, S. M. Modulating metal–organic frameworks to breathe: a postsynthetic covalent modification approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 16675–16677 (2009).
Henke, S., Schneemann, A., Wütscher, A. & Fischer, R. A. Directing the breathing behavior of pillared-layered metal−organic frameworks via a systematic library of functionalized linkers bearing flexible substituents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9464–9474 (2012).
Henke, S., Schneemann, A. & Fischer, R. A. Massive anisotropic thermal expansion and thermo-responsive breathing in metal–organic frameworks modulated by linker functionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 5990–5996 (2013).
Schneemann, A. et al. Different breathing mechanisms in flexible pillared-layered metal–organic frameworks: impact of the metal center. Chem. Mater. 30, 1667–1676 (2018).
Schwedler, I. et al. Mixed-linker solid solutions of functionalized pillared-layer MOFs—adjusting structural flexibility, gas sorption, and thermal responsiveness. Dalton Trans. 45, 4230–4241 (2016).
Furukawa, S., Reboul, J., Diring, S., Sumida, K. & Susumu Kitagawa, S. Structuring of metal–organic frameworks at the mesoscopic/macroscopic scale. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5700–5734 (2014).
Tanaka, D. et al. Rapid preparation of flexible porous coordination polymer nanocrystals with accelerated guest adsorption kinetics. Nat. Chem. 2, 410–416 (2010).
Sakata, Y. et al. Shape-memory nanopores induced in coordination frameworks by crystal downsizing. Science 339, 193–196 (2013).
Miura, H. et al. Tuning the gate-opening pressure and particle size distribution of the switchable metal–organic framework DUT-8(Ni) by controlled nucleation in a micromixer. Dalton Trans. 46, 14002–14011 (2017).
Krause, S. et al. The effect of crystallite size on pressure amplification in switchable porous solids. Nat. Commun. 9, 1573 (2018).
Falcaro, P. et al. MOF positioning technology and device fabrication. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5513–5560 (2014).
Liu, J. & Wöll, C. Surface-supported metal–organic framework thin films: fabrication methods, applications, and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5730–5770 (2017).
Stassen, I. et al. An updated roadmap for the integration of metal–organic frameworks with electronic devices and chemical sensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3185–3241 (2017).
Zacher, D. et al. Liquid-phase epitaxy of multicomponent layer-based porous coordination polymer thin films of [M(L)(P)0.5] type: importance of deposition sequence on the oriented growth. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 1448–1455 (2011).
Heinke, L., Tu, M., Wannapaiboon, S., Fischer, R. A. & Wöll, C. Surface-mounted metal–organic frameworks for applications in sensing and separation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 216, 200–215 (2015).
Scherb, C., Koehn, R. & Bein, T. Sorption behavior of an oriented surface-grown MOF-film studied by in situ X-ray diffraction. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 3046–3051 (2010).
Haraguchi, T., Otsubo, K., Sakata, O., Fujiwara, A. & Kitagawa, H. Guest-induced two-way structural transformation in a layered metal–organic framework thin film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16787–16793 (2016).
Sakaida, S. et al. Crystalline coordination framework endowed with dynamic gate-opening behaviour by being downsized to a thin film. Nat. Chem. 8, 377–383 (2016).
Falcaro, P. et al. Centimetre-scale micropore alignment in oriented polycrystalline metal–organic framework films via heteroepitaxial growth. Nat. Mater. 16, 342–348 (2017).
Wannapaiboon, S. et al. Enhanced properties of metal–organic framework thin films fabricated via a coordination modulation-controlled layer-by-layer process. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 13665–13673 (2017).
Virmani, E. et al. On-surface synthesis of highly oriented thin metal-organic framework films through vapor-assisted conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4812–4819 (2018).
Wannapaiboon, S. et al. Hierarchical structuring of metal-organic framework thin-films on quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) substrates for selective adsorption applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 23385–23394 (2015).
Wang, Z. et al. Directing the hetero-growth of lattice-mismatched surface-mounted metal-organic frameworks by functionalizing the interface. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 21295–21303 (2018).
Krywka, C. et al. The small-angle and wide-angle X-Ray scattering set-up at beamline BL9 of DELTA. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 14, 244–251 (2007).
Acknowledgements
This work was initially supported by the Cluster of Excellence RESOLV (EXC 1069) and further by DFG FOR 2433 FLEXMOF funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). DELTA is acknowledged for providing synchrotron radiation at beamline BL9 for grazing incidence X-ray diffraction measurements. S.W. acknowledges the Royal Thai Government under the Ministry of Science and Technology for a Ph.D. scholarship, the International Realisation Budget (IRB) of the Research School Plus, Ruhr-University Bochum (GSC 98) for international travel and research funding, and the Technical University of Munich for a Postdoctoral Fellowship. A.S. acknowledges the German Research Foundation for a Postdoctoral Fellowship. Katja Rodewald, Wacker-Chair of Macromolecular Chemistry, Technical University of Munich is acknowledged for measuring the cross-sectional SEM of the thin-film samples.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W. conceived, designed and performed the project under supervision of R.A.F; A.S. synthesised the organic linkers and bulk powder samples; S.W., A.S., I.H., M.T., K.E. performed the in-situ GIXRD at DELTA synchrotron facility; S.W. and A.L.S. collected the adsorption data and SEM images; C.S. and M.P. helped designing the setup for in-situ GIXRD during adsorption and provided helpful discussion and support during the measurement at DELTA; A.S. and S.J.B. performed the Pawley refinements of GIXRD patterns of the powder samples; S.W., A.S., G.K. and R.A.F. co-wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wannapaiboon, S., Schneemann, A., Hante, I. et al. Control of structural flexibility of layered-pillared metal-organic frameworks anchored at surfaces. Nat Commun 10, 346 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08285-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08285-5
This article is cited by
-
Chemically routed interpore molecular diffusion in metal-organic framework thin films
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Temperature dependence of adsorption hysteresis in flexible metal organic frameworks
Communications Chemistry (2020)
-
Gold nanoparticle–decorated metal organic frameworks on immunochromatographic assay for human chorionic gonadotropin detection
Microchimica Acta (2020)
-
Unraveling the thermodynamic criteria for size-dependent spontaneous phase separation in soft porous crystals
Nature Communications (2019)