Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer


Wave-particle duality is an inherent peculiarity of the quantum world. The double-slit experiment has been frequently used for understanding different aspects of this fundamental concept. The occurrence of interference rests on the lack of which-way information and on the absence of decoherence mechanisms, which could scramble the wave fronts. Here, we report on the observation of two-center interference in the molecular-frame photoelectron momentum distribution upon ionization of the neon dimer by a strong laser field. Postselection of ions, which are measured in coincidence with electrons, allows choosing the symmetry of the residual ion, leading to observation of both, gerade and ungerade, types of interference.


Wave-like behavior of microscopic particles, e.g. interference, and, in general, the particle-wave duality is “the mystery”, as stated by Feynman1, “which is impossible, absolutely impossible, to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics”. The double-slit experiment, which was originally conducted by Young in the early 1800s to prove the wave nature of light, has been widely utilized to learn about different aspects of this “mystery”. In the 1960s it was realized that the double-slit experiment can be performed on the molecular level by exploiting two sites of a diatomic molecule as coherent electron emitters2. Liberation of an electron from such a system – for instance, upon single-photon absorption – will result in interference of two partial waves, spatially separated by the molecular bond length. Two-center photoelectron interference upon single photon ionization (weak field regime) has been observed for H23,4,5,6, N25,7,8,9,10, O211, weakly bound Ne212, and even for polyatomic molecules such as simple hydrocarbons13.

Recent theoretical works14,15,16 have suggested that this concept can be transferred to strong-field ionization and thus ultrafast time scales. Reasons possibly contradicting this generalization are that strong-field ionization is often described by tunneling ionization, where the tunnel exit and, thus, the birth position of the electron is not at the atomic centers but at a distance comparable to the extent of the molecule. Furthermore, the electrons are accelerated in the laser field and reach their final momentum only at an even larger distance. Thus, it might not be obvious which momentum is relevant for the spacing of the interference fringes. The presence of the Coulomb field of the parent ion during the acceleration by the laser field causes another potential problem for double-slit interference as it leads, in particular for linearly polarized light, to massive deformation of the phase front of the emitted electron. Experimental support, so far, for double-slit type interference in the strong-field context is suppression of the ionization efficiency of the oxygen molecule17 and xenon dimer18 as compared to xenon atom due to destructive two-center interference. In a pioneering experiment, differences in the photoelectron spectra of non-aligned argon dimers and argon atoms were found and attributed to double-slit interference19. More recent work, however, contradicted this conclusion20 and attributed similar differences to post-collision interaction. In general, spatial photoelectron interferences and symmetry of the corresponding molecular orbital are believed to have a significant impact on many applications in strong-field physics such as imaging of electron density and molecular structure as well as high harmonics generation21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32.

Here we provide an unambiguous experimental proof that the two-center interference survives strong field ionization despite possible obstacles mentioned above. Unlike the earlier experiments18,19,20, our approach provides access to the photoelectron momentum distribution in the molecular frame, which clearly shows an interference pattern upon ionization of neon dimer in both circular as well as linear polarized laser fields. The measured photoelectron distributions are well reproduced by the theory based on the two-center interference, leaving no doubts about the origin of the interference pattern. Moreover, by choosing between two dissociation channels of residual Ne2+ ion, we have been able to switch the symmetry type of this interference.


Molecular double-slit

The most natural observable to search for double-slit interference is the momentum component of the interfering particle parallel to the distance vector between the two slits. Superposition of two spherical waves \(\psi _{1,2} = \frac{1}{{\left| {\mathbf{r}} \right|}} \cdot e^{i\left( {{\mathbf{k}} \cdot \left( {{\mathbf{r}} \pm \frac{{\mathbf{R}}}{2}} \right) + \phi _{1,2}} \right)}\) with momentum k emerging from two centers separated by R results in a probability distribution:

$$P\sim \mathrm{cos}^2\left( {{\mathbf{k}} \cdot \frac{{\mathbf{R}}}{2} + \frac{{\Delta \phi }}{2}} \right)$$

where ∆ϕ = ϕ1ϕ2 is the initial phase difference between the two waves. For the optical double-slit both waves are in phase (∆ϕ = 0) and one typically expresses interference in terms of the wavelength λ = 2π/|k| and the angle ϑ with respect to the normal to R as \(\mathrm{cos}^2\left( {\frac{{\pi \left| {\mathbf{R}} \right|\sin \vartheta }}{\lambda }} \right)\).

On the molecular level, the experimental challenge, thus, is to measure the projection of the electron momentum onto the molecular axis R. As the molecules in a gas-phase sample are randomly oriented, this requires measuring the molecular axis for each ionization event in coincidence with the electron momentum. This is possible for neon dimers, which after single ionization dissociate rapidly (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2) along the bond axis into Ne0 and Ne+; thus detection of the emission direction of the Ne+ ion in coincidence with the electron emission direction allows obtaining the momentum component of the electron along the bond axis.

Strong field ionization of the neon dimer

In the experiment Ne2 was ionized by a 40 fs (FWHM in intensity) 780 nm laser field with intensities of 7.3×1014 W cm−2 (Keldysh parameter γ = 0.72) in case of circular polarization and 1.2×1015 W cm−2 (γ = 0.4) for linear polarization. The charged products after ionization were detected in coincidence by COLTRIMS33. Here we only consider the single-ionization process that leads to the breakup of the dimer into a singly charged and a neutral neon atom.

The kinetic energy release (KER) acquired by the two neon counterparts after dissociation of the dimer shows two distinct structures around 0.15 eV and 1.3 eV (Fig. 1b). The low-energy part corresponds to liberation of an electron from the 2pσg orbital, which results in direct dissociation of the dimer along its II(1/2)g ionic state (Fig. 1a, blue path). The KER ~1.3 eV is reached by absorption of one additional photon from the laser field after initial evolution along the I(1/2)u potential energy curve (removal of the electron from the 2pσu orbital). This transition lifts the dimer up to the II(1/2)g ionic state, but at a shorter internuclear distance, resulting in gain of higher KER34 (Fig. 1a, red path, indirect dissociation).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Two ionization pathways of neon dimer. a Relevant potential energy curves of the neutral and the singly charged neon dimer. Potential energy curves are taken from ref. 43. Spin-orbit splitting was simulated by separating the asymptotic parts of the I and II curves by 100 meV. b Kinetic energy release (KER) for the Ne+-Ne0 dissociation channel. Two dissociation pathways leading to Ne+-Ne0 fragmentation are shown by red (indirect) and blue (direct) arrows. The inset shows the electron momentum distribution in the molecular frame, when both pathways are considered. The red side of the sketched molecule defines the momentum direction of the detected neon ion. k and k are the electron momentum components parallel and perpendicular to the dimer axis, respectively. The corresponding orbitals of the neutral dimer are shown next to the potential energy curves. The ground state energy potential of the neutral dimer X1g+ as well as the corresponding probability distribution are shown for visualization of the ionization step according to the Franck-Condon principle

Double-slit interference in circularly polarized light

For observing double-slit interference, it is decisive that the initial phase difference Δϕ is the same for each event. For the optical case, this is trivially true, while for the homonuclear molecular case this is not always granted, since the electrons emerging from molecular orbitals of gerade and ungerade symmetries have a Δϕ = π. This converts fringes to anti-fringes and washes away the interference pattern. It is the reason why almost all molecular double-slit experiments are performed on H2 with only one symmetry (compare N29 and Ne212 for exceptions). As shown in Fig. 1, the dissociation process allows us to separate the two cases of emission from a gerade and an ungerade orbital by selecting events from a certain region of KER. If both KER regions are selected, implying that both ionization channels are mixed, the photoelectron spectrum in the molecular frame shows no interferences (Fig. 1b, inset). The separation is shown in Fig. 2. The electron removed from the gerade 2pσg orbital shows an interference pattern with the minimum along the k axis at k = 0 (Fig. 2b, direct dissociation), whereas the ionization from the ungerade 2pσu orbital results in a maximum at that position (Fig. 2e, indirect dissociation). This swapped interference behavior is understood given the p-character of the orbitals. The interference is indeed seen in the final electron momentum, which is acquired in a laser field after ionization rather than in the initial momentum at the tunnel exit.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photoelectron momentum distributions of Ne2 in the molecular frame for the circularly polarized light. a, d are simulated spectra with two coherently superimposed atomic distributions; b, e – measured for the direct and indirect dissociations, respectively; c, f are the same as the distributions in b, e but normalized to the monomer distribution in order to remove ionization weighting of the final momenta. The red side of the sketched molecule defines the momentum direction of the measured neon ion. k and k are the electron momentum components parallel and perpendicular to the dimer axis, respectively

Normalization of the electron spectra of the dimer by the single-ionization spectrum of neon atoms, which is recorded in the same measurement, allows us to remove the intrinsic ionization weighting, which has a doughnut-like shape due to tunneling ionization in a circular laser field35,36. After such normalization, the interference stripes perpendicular to the internuclear axis become clearly visible (Fig. 2c, f). These structures resemble the double-slit interferences described by eq. 1 with Δϕ being either 0 or π.

Within our theoretical model, two atomic photoelectron momentum distributions were coherently superimposed in order to reproduce the double-slit interference pattern (Fig. 2a, d). For each atomic spectrum, the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) was solved numerically within the single-active-electron approximation. An initial state was chosen to be a p orbital with lobes pointing along the hypothetical internuclear axis, thus, resembling one half of a 2pσ orbital of the dimer. The final momentum distributions were then projected onto the molecular frame (see Methods). This approach (Fig. 2a, d) accurately reproduces the double-slit interference, apart from the finite contrast in the fringes (see Supplementary Notes 5 and 6, Supplementary Figs. 6-9). This contrast, as the more complete theory indicates, is most likely due to interaction of the outgoing electron with the neighboring atom in the dimer (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3).

Double-slit interference in linearly polarized light

Pronounced interference patterns have also been observed upon ionization of the neon dimer in a linearly polarized laser field (Fig. 3). Here the dimer axis was postselected to lie within ±15° to the field polarization direction. The two-center interference changes the photoelectron distribution significantly: for direct ionization of Ne2 the pronounced minimum appears at zero momentum, where naturally, according to the tunneling theory, the maximum of the distribution resides. The experiment with the linearly polarized light shows that the two-center interference also survives among low energy electrons (k < 0.5 a.u.) despite their strong Coulomb interaction with the residual ion.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photoelectron momentum distributions of Ne2 for linearly polarized light. Normalized photoelectron momentum distributions projected to the molecular axis for the direct (a) and indirect (b) dissociation pathways in case of linearly polarized light. The spectra were generated by selecting only the events, where the dimer axis lies within ±15 to the polarization direction of the laser field. In addition, the ion momenta were limited to 4.5–16 a.u. and 39–45 a.u for the direct and indirect dissociation, respectively. Original spectra were divided by the corresponding spectrum of the monomer in order to remove the ionization weighting. k is the electron momentum component parallel to the dimer axis

The dependence of the interference on the distance between the slits (|R|) allows, in turn, to utilize the fringe pattern as a tool to measure the bond distance, which is the basis for diffractive imaging. In Fig. 4 we show the sensitivity of this approach. In addition to the interference, the ion momentum gives a second independent measure of the internuclear distance4. The II(1/2)g and I(1/2)u potentials map the ground-state density distribution of the neon dimer onto the final momentum (energy) of the fragments37 for the direct and indirect dissociations, respectively. Resolving the distance between the two centers, one can see how the interference maxima move apart with decreasing separation between the two atomic centers (which corresponds to the higher ion momenta for the direct dissociation and to the lower ion momenta for the indirect one, Fig. 4). This observation is fully reproduced using eq. 1 with either ∆ϕ = π or Δϕ = 0 (Fig. 4b, d). Here, the ion momentum was deduced by mapping internuclear distance to kinetic energy due to motion along the II(1/2)g and I(1/2)u potentials. The inverse relation between the internuclear distance and the ion momentum for the indirect dissociation is the proof that the dimer upon ionization initially moves along the binding I(1/2)u ionic potential energy curve, which has in the Franck-Condon region the opposite slope as the II(1/2)g potential.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dependence of the two-center electron interference on the internuclear distance. The internuclear distance is encoded in the momentum of the ion. a, c – experimental distributions for the linearly polarized light (symmetrized with respect to the k = 0 line) for direct and indirect dissociation pathways, respectively; b, d classical simulations using the II(1/2)g and I(1/2)u potential energy curves, respectively (Fig. 1). Each row in a, c was divided by the spectrum of the monomer in order to remove the ionization weighting. For the eye guidance, the white lines on the simulated distributions show dependence of the fringe position on the ion momentum. The dimer axis was selected to lie within ±15° to the field polarization direction. k is the electron momentum component parallel to the dimer axis

Internuclear distance distribution of Ne2

Quantitative estimation of the internuclear distance by applying these two approaches (see Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5) to the measured distributions in Fig. 4a, c allows to obtain the bond length correlation plots shown in Fig. 5. As one can see, there is a mismatch between potential mapping and interference approaches in determination of the bond length. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is inaccuracy of the potential mapping approach due to the laser induced changes in the II(1/2)g and I(1/2)u potentials, similar to the bond-hardening and bond-softening effects in H2+ 38,39,40. Namely, a high laser field might shift down the II(1/2)g and lift up the I(1/2)u potential curves resulting in a lower (higher) ion momentum after the direct (indirect) fragmentation with respect to the unperturbed potentials. Since we used the unperturbed potential curves, the deduced bond lengths appeared to be larger for direct dissociation and lower for indirect one than those upon consideration of the real field-dressed potentials.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of the two methods in determination of the bond length. Rion is the bond length of Ne2 obtained from the ion momentum after the direct (blue) and indirect (red) fragmentations. Rinterf is the bond length obtained from the corresponding two-center interference pattern. Statistical error bars for the Rinterf correspond to the 1σ confidence interval. The black dashed diagonal line visualizes the exact matching dependence

Assuming that the two-center interference method provide more accurate estimation of the internuclear distances upon ionization, there is still a question why the corresponding length distribution (ca. 2.8–3.25 Å) is lower than the expectation value of the ground state internuclear distance of 3.337 ± 0.001 Å obtained by means of high resolution spectroscopy41. The answer to this question depends on the dissociation channel. In case of direct fragmentation the lowering of the II(1/2)g potential by a laser field results in lower ion momenta upon dissociation. The part of the ground state distribution corresponding to larger internuclear distances, thus, acquires very tiny momenta (<3.5 a.u.) along the shallow field-dressed dissociation potential and does not fulfill the momentum requirement for being considered as the direct ionization channel (3.5–17 a.u., see Methods). In case of indirect dissociation, the vibrational wave packets started to move along the I(1/2)u potential at large internuclear distances take longer to reach the Franck-Condon region for one-photon transition to the dissociative II(1/2)g potential. If the wave packet fails to reach this region within a laser pulse, the Ne2+ ion remains bound and, thus, undetected in the indirect channel. In both cases, the larger internuclear distances become suppressed.


We have observed two-center photoelectron interference upon ionization of the neon dimer by a strong laser field. Unlike previous double-slit experiments in laser fields, we have measured the two-dimensional photoelectron momentum distribution in the molecular frame. This distribution shows distinct fringe patterns, proving that the two-center interference survives strong field ionization despite some peculiarities of this process. By postselecting the dissociation channel of the dimer we were able to choose the orbital the electron was liberated from. This postselection allows for switching between gerade and ungerade interference patterns in the molecular-frame photoelectron distribution, depending on the orbital parity. Turning it around, one can obtain the phase along the molecular orbital by considering the corresponding interference pattern. Another application of the two-center interference is the measurement of the bond length. Moreover, since an ion momentum during dissociation is determined by the corresponding ionic potential, the dependences shown in Fig. 4 might be used for revealing these potential energy curves in the Franck-Condon region. The finite contrast in the interference pattern is most likely related to interaction of the liberated electron with the neighboring neutral atom in the dimer. Extension of the molecular double-slit experiment to strong-field ionization allows for better understanding of different aspects of molecular ionization such as ionization probability and photoelectron angular distribution and opens up ways - ultimately time-resolved - of probing fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics.



The neon dimers were prepared in a molecular beam under supersonic expansion of gaseous neon at a temperature of 60 K through a 5 µm nozzle (see Supplementary Figure 1). The nozzle temperature was stabilized within ±0.1 K by a continuous flow cryogenic cryostat (Model RC110 UHV, Cryo Industries of America, Inc.). The optimum dimer yield was found at a nozzle back pressure of 3 bar. Neon dimers were selected from the molecular beam by means of matter wave diffraction using a transmission grating with a period of 100 nm. The selection allowed increasing the relative yield of Ne2 from typically 2%12 to 20% with respect to the monomer.

The neon dimers were singly ionized by a strong ultra-short laser field (40 fs -FWHM in intensity -, 780 nm, 8 kHz, Dragon KMLabs). The field intensities were 7.3×1014 W cm−2 (Keldysh parameter γ = 0.72) in case of circular polarization and 1.2×1015 W cm−2 (γ = 0.4) in the experiment with linearly polarized light. The 3D-momenta of the ion and the electron after ionization were measured by cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy (COLTRIMS). In the COLTRIMS spectrometer a homogeneous electric field of 16 V cm−1 for circularly polarized light, or 23 V cm−1 in case of linearly polarized laser field, guided the ions onto a time- and position-sensitive micro-channel plate detector with hexagonal delay-line position readout42 and an active area of 80 mm. In order to achieve 4π solid angle detection of electrons with momenta up to 2.5 a.u., a magnetic field of 12.5 G was applied within the COLTRIMS spectrometer in the experiment with the circularly polarized laser field. In the case of linearly polarized light a magnetic field of 9 G was utilized. The ion and electron detectors were placed at 450 mm and 250 mm, respectively, away from the ionization region.

Molecular frame photoelectron spectra

The photoelectron momentum distributions with respect to the molecular axis shown in Fig. 2 were generated in the following way. Initially, the ions were assigned to the one of the two breakup channels, direct and indirect, by requiring the magnitude of the ion momentum to be within 3.5–17 a.u. and 37–46 a.u., respectively. This gating ensure that the ion comes from the breakup of the dimer along II(1/2)g state (Fig. 1a). The ionization of atomic neon as well as dissociation over the other potential curves43 would result in the ion momentum smaller than 3 a.u. Subsequently, only ionization events have been considered, where ion and electron momentum vectors lie within slices along the polarization plane, defined by the conditions |px| < 0.55 a.u. for electrons as well as |px| < 3.5 a.u. and |px| < 12.0 a.u. for ions from the direct and indirect dissociation channels, respectively (the x-direction is the light propagation direction). These conditions ensure that the angle between a momentum vector and the polarization plane does not exceed 45° in the worst case. For the majority of events this angle is, however, smaller than 30°. Both, electron and ion momentum vectors were projected onto the polarization plane. The projection of the ion momentum defines the k|| direction, whereas the two components, k|| and k, of the electron projection are plotted in Fig. 2. This type of molecular frame transformation avoids nodes along the dimer axis. It does not conserve the product k·R, but the loss of contrast in the interference patterns is negligible. Another type of transformation, a natural one, where the ion momentum vector, not its projection, defines the k|| direction is presented in the Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 4.


Starting from a 2p atomic orbital aligned along the molecular axis, we solve the three-dimensional TDSE in single-active-electron approximation with the split-operator method on a Cartesian grid with 512 points in each dimension, a grid spacing of 0.25 a.u. and a time step of 0.02 a.u. While propagating up to a final time T = 1500 a.u., outgoing parts of the wave function are projected onto Volkov states44. The potential for a single neon atom is chosen as in ref. 45 but with the singularity removed using a pseudopotential46 for angular momentum l = 1. The clockwise circularly polarized pulse has a 12-cycle sin2 envelope and a peak field strength of 0.096 a.u. To obtain the momentum distribution for the dimer we multiply two copies of the atomic distribution by e±ik·R/2, respectively (|R|/2 = 2.93 a.u.) and then add them coherently with an additional factor of ± 1 depending on the type of interference, gerade, or ungerade. To account for different possible orientations of the dimer with respect to the polarization plane, we vary the angle between them in 8 steps to cover a range from 0 to 45°, project the molecular photoelectron momentum distribution (PMD) onto the polarization plane and add these projections together with their geometrical weights. The PMDs are then averaged over the ATI peaks to obtain the final distributions shown in Fig. 2.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. The Feynman lectures on physics. 3: Quantum mechanics (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., Reading, Mass, London, 1965).

  2. 2.

    Cohen, H. D. & Fano, U. Interference in the Photo-Ionization of Molecules. Phys. Rev. 150, 30–33 (1966).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Akoury, D. et al. The simplest double slit: interference and entanglement in double photoionization of H2. Science 318, 949–952 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schöffler, M. S. et al. Photo-double-ionization of H2: Two-center interference and its dependence on the internuclear distance. Phys. Rev. A 78, 013414 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Canton, S. E. et al. Direct observation of Young’s double-slit interferences in vibrationally resolved photoionization of diatomic molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 7302–7306 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Waitz, M. et al. Two-particle interference of electron pairs on a molecular level. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 083002 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rolles, D. et al. Isotope-induced partial localization of core electrons in the homonuclear molecule N2. Nature 437, 711–715 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu, X.-J. et al. Young’s double-slit experiment using core-level photoemission from N 2: revisiting Cohen–Fano’s two-centre interference phenomenon. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 39, 4801 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schöffler, M. S. et al. Ultrafast probing of core hole localization in N2. Science 320, 920–923 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zimmermann, B. et al. Localization and loss of coherence in molecular double-slit experiments. Nat. Phys. 4, 649–655 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Liu, X.-J. et al. Einstein–Bohr recoiling double-slit gedanken experiment performed at the molecular level. Nat. Photon 9, 120–125 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sann, H. et al. Delocalization of a Vacancy across Two Neon Atoms Bound by the van der Waals Force. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 263001 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kushawaha, R. K. et al. From double-slit interference to structural information in simple hydrocarbons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15201–15206 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Henkel, J., Lein, M. & Engel, V. Interference in above-threshold-ionization electron distributions from molecules. Phys. Rev. A 83, 051401 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lai, X., Faria, C. F. & de, M. Temporal and spatial interference in molecular above-threshold ionization with elliptically polarized fields. Phys. Rev. A 88, 013406 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hu, S., Chen, J., Hao, X. & Li, W. Effect of low-energy electron interference on strong-field molecular ionization. Phys. Rev. A 93, 023424 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Muth-Böhm, J., Becker, A. & Faisal, F. H. M. Suppressed molecular ionization for a class of diatomics in intense femtosecond laser fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2280–2283 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang, C., Feng, T., Raabe, N. & Rottke, H. Strong-field ionization of xenon dimers: The effect of two-equivalent-center interference and of driving ionic transitions. Phys. Rev. A 97, 023417 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ansari, Z. et al. Interference in strong-field ionization of a two-centre atomic system. New J. Phys. 10, 093027 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, M. et al. Charge oscillation in multiphoton and tunneling ionization of rare-gas dimers. Phys. Rev. A 89, 025402 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lein, M., Hay, N., Velotta, R., Marangos, J. P. & Knight, P. L. Interference effects in high-order harmonic generation with molecules. Phys. Rev. A 66, 023805 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jaroń-Becker, A., Becker, A. & Faisal, F. H. M. Ionization of N2, O2, and linear carbon clusters in a strong laser pulse. Phys. Rev. A 69, 023410 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lin, C. D. & Tong, X. M. Dependence of tunneling ionization and harmonic generation on the structure of molecules by short intense laser pulses. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 182, 213–219 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Meckel, M. et al. Laser-induced electron tunneling and diffraction. Science 320, 1478–1482 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lock, R. M., Zhou, X., Li, W., Murnane, M. M. & Kapteyn, H. C. Measuring the intensity and phase of high-order harmonic emission from aligned molecules. Chem. Phys. 366, 22–32 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li, W. et al. Visualizing electron rearrangement in space and time during the transition from a molecule to atoms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20219 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Son, S.-K., Telnov, D. A. & Chu, S.-I. Probing the origin of elliptical high-order harmonic generation from aligned molecules in linearly polarized laser fields. Phys. Rev. A 82, 043829 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Das, T., Augstein, B. B. & Figueira de Morisson Faria, C. High-order-harmonic generation from diatomic molecules in driving fields with nonvanishing ellipticity: a generalized interference condition. Phys. Rev. A 88, 023404 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Diveki, Z. et al. Molecular orbital tomography from multi-channel harmonic emission in N2. Attosecond Spectrosc. 414, 121–129 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Petersen, I., Henkel, J. & Lein, M. Signatures of molecular orbital structure in lateral electron momentum distributions from strong-field ionization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 103004 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yun, H., Yun, S. J., Lee, G. H. & Nam, C. H. High-harmonic spectroscopy of aligned molecules. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 022001 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Su, N., Yu, S., Li, W., Yang, S. & Chen, Y. Probing the structure of multi-center molecules with odd–even high harmonics. Chin. Phys. B 27, 054213 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction-microscopes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wu, J. et al. Steering the nuclear motion in singly ionized argon dimers with mutually detuned laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 033005 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Popov, V. S. Tunnel and multiphoton ionization of atoms and ions in a strong laser field (Keldysh theory). Phys. -Uspekhi 47, 855 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Smeenk, C. et al. Precise in-situ measurement of laser pulse intensity using strong field ionization. Opt. Express 19, 9336–9344 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schmidt, L. P. H. et al. Spatial imaging of the H2 + vibrational wave function at the quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 073202 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bandrauk, A. D. & Sink, M. L. Photodissociation in intense laser fields: Predissociation analogy. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 1110–1117 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Frasinski, L. J. et al. Manipulation of bond hardening in H2 + by chirping of intense femtosecond laser pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3625–3628 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bucksbaum, P. H., Zavriyev, A., Muller, H. G. & Schumacher, D. W. Softening of the H2+ molecular bond in intense laser fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1883–1886 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wüest, A. & Merkt, F. Determination of the interaction potential of the ground electronic state of Ne2 by high-resolution vacuum ultraviolet laser spectroscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8807–8812 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Jagutzki, O. et al. Multiple hit readout of a microchannel plate detector with a three-layer delay-line anode. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 49, 2477–2483 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Demekhin, P. V., Stoychev, S. D., Kuleff, A. I. & Cederbaum, L. S. Exploring interatomic coulombic decay by free electron lasers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 273002 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lein, M., Gross, E. K. U. & Engel, V. Intense-field double ionization of helium: identifying the mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4707–4710 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Tong, X.-M. & Lin, C. D. Empirical formula for static field ionization rates of atoms and molecules by lasers in the barrier-suppression regime. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, 2593 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Troullier, N. & Martins, J. L. Efficient pseudopotentials for plane-wave calculations. Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993–2006 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge financial support in the frame of the Priority Programme “Quantum Dynamics in Tailored Intense Fields” (QUTIF) of the German Research Foundation.

Author information




M.K., P.H., J.K., S.Z., J.V., N.S., K.H., H.S., F.T., L.Ph.H.S., A.K., M.S.S., T.J., and R.D. contributed to the experiment. M.K. and R.D. analyzed the data. N.E and M.L. performed the calculations. All authors contributed to the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Maksim Kunitski or Reinhard Dörner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunitski, M., Eicke, N., Huber, P. et al. Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer. Nat Commun 10, 1 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing