Reversible and selective ion intercalation through the top surface of few-layer MoS2

Abstract

Electrochemical intercalation of ions into the van der Waals gap of two-dimensional (2D) layered materials is a promising low-temperature synthesis strategy to tune their physical and chemical properties. It is widely believed that ions prefer intercalation into the van der Waals gap through the edges of the 2D flake, which generally causes wrinkling and distortion. Here we demonstrate that the ions can also intercalate through the top surface of few-layer MoS2 and this type of intercalation is more reversible and stable compared to the intercalation through the edges. Density functional theory calculations show that this intercalation is enabled by the existence of natural defects in exfoliated MoS2 flakes. Furthermore, we reveal that sealed-edge MoS2 allows intercalation of small alkali metal ions (e.g., Li+ and Na+) and rejects large ions (e.g., K+). These findings imply potential applications in developing functional 2D-material-based devices with high tunability and ion selectivity.

Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene, hexagonal boron nitride, and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted intense interest in areas of optoelectronics1,2, nanoelectronics3, and membrane separations4,5, due to their unique physical and chemical properties6,7. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is a member of 2D layered TMDs consisting of molecular layers held together by van der Waals forces. Monolayer MoS2 is one of the thinnest semiconductors available and has been widely studied in electronic devices2,3. The maximum carrier density is on the order of 1012–1014 cm−2 with solid dielectric gating and ionic liquid gating8,9. In contrast, few-layer or bulk MoS2 has been mostly used in energy storage10 and electrocatalysis11. Recently, based on the same principle (intercalation/de-intercalation) as in electrochemical applications, guest species such as alkali metal ions (Li+, Na+, and K+) have been introduced into the large interlayer spacing (~ 0.615 nm) to manipulate and optimize the optical and electrical properties of few-layer MoS212,13,14. Ion intercalation12,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 enables extremely high doping level (e.g., 6 × 1014 cm−2 in few layer graphene after Li intercalation25) compared with electrical gating. Such high doping levels allow new physics to be discovered, such as superconductivity26 and facilitates applications of few-layer MoS2 in optoelectronic and nanoelectronic devices. However, intercalation of ions often induces wrinkling and distortion of MoS2 and even irreversible structural changes14,27,28 that hinder its practical applications.

On the other hand, ultrathin 2D materials have been explored as novel separation membrane to realize ultrafast and high-selective sieving of gases and ions at low energy cost4,5,29,30,31. In these applications, the structural defects, interlayer spacing, or pores created by ion bombardment and oxidative etching have been used as the transport channels for the species. Manipulating ion transport through 2D material membrane via delicate electrical control, which has never been achieved before, would be much more effective and provide additional freedom for membrane designs of future functional devices.

Here, we demonstrate reversible and selective ion intercalation through the top surface of few-layer MoS2. We seal the edges of MoS2 to alleviate the structural deformation and to allow careful examination of intercalation only through the top surface. Through in situ optical and Raman measurements as well as the ab-initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we prove that the ions can intercalate through the intrinsic defects into the few-layer MoS2, and this type of intercalation is much more reversible than through the edges. The subtle electrochemical control can dramatically modify the optical and electrical properties of MoS2 in a reversible manner. Particularly, we obtain electron density up to 1022 cm−3 in few-nanometer-thick flakes, highest value among all the gating methods. The reversible ion intercalation and de-intercalation through top surface will benefit future material designs in highly tunable and stable 2D material-based optoelectronic and nanoelectronic devices. Furthermore, we show that the sealed MoS2 flakes allow intercalation of Li+, Na+ but not K+ and the selective intercalation through electrochemical control holds great potential in applications, such as ionic sieving and desalination of salted water.

Results

Electrochemical intercalation

Figure 1a shows the layered structure of MoS2. Each layer has a plane of close-packed molybdenum (Mo) atoms sandwiched by two planes of close-packed sulfur (S) atoms (S–Mo–S). The atoms within each layer are strongly bonded by covalent interactions, whereas the interactions between layers are through weak van der Waals forces. The weak forces between the layers allow expansion of the van der Waals gap and insertion of ions. A planar battery configuration (Fig. 1b) was applied to perform electrochemical intercalation where MoS2 flakes and alkali metals or alkali-containing electrode materials were used as working and counter electrodes, respectively. To compare the intercalation behavior of MoS2 flakes with sealed edge and open edge, the Au electrodes around flake or on flake were carefully designed and patterned by electron-beam lithography (EBL) (see Methods). MoS2 flakes, alkali metals/salts, and electrolyte were sealed in a cell where the top transparent glass allows in situ optical observation and confocal Raman microscopy. Figure 1c, d show how sealed edge and open edge configurations are designed on two typical MoS2 flakes—the electrodes covering all the edges for sealed edge and that only covering part of the flakes for open edge. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the flakes show that these flakes were around 6.5 nm (~10 layers) and 5 nm (~8 layers) in thickness, respectively. We also performed AFM measurements before and after the Au depositions to inspect the MoS2/Au morphology and interface. The clear steps of the Au metal on top of MoS2 edges indicated that the Au deposition was mild and uniform and successfully sealed the MoS2 flake without damaging the covered MoS2 surface (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of the material and of the experimental setup. a Li+, Na+, and K+ intercalation into MoS2 through top and edge channels. b An electrochemical cell used to perform intercalation of Li+, Na+, and K+ into MoS2 with sealed and open edge. c-d AFM and optical microscopy images of typical MoS2 flakes designed for sealed edge measurement and open edge measurement, respectively. The thicknesses are typically < 10 nm, measured across three edges indicated by the dash lines. Scale bars in c and d, 5 µm

Li-ion intercalation into MoS2 through top surface and edges

Figure 2 shows intercalation of Li+ into MoS2, comparing flakes with sealed edge (i.e., through top surface) and open edge (i.e., through edges). The open circuit voltage (OCV) of MoS2 vs. Li/Li+ was ~3.0 V. We gradually lowered the MoS2 potential with respect to Li/Li+ from 3.5 to 0.8 V with steps of ~0.2 V. We did not go lower than 0.8 V to avoid irreversible conversion reactions32. Figure 2a depicts the intercalation of Li+ into the sealed-edge MoS2 flake. When the potential of MoS2 was lowered to around 1.2 V, the color started to change to dark green, indicating the successful intercalation of Li+ into the van der Waals gap of MoS2 from the top surface. The flake exhibited a gradual and uniform change in color with further decrease in potential till 0.8 V, and recovered to its original bright green color when the potential was returned to 3.5 V. The intercalation and de-intercalation can be repeated for several times without disrupting the host structure (Fig. 2a, cycles 2–3). For the open-edge MoS2 flake (Fig. 2b), the color started to change at a relatively high potential around 1.4 V, possibly due to a lower energy barrier for the Li+ to initiate intercalation. The color change started from the edges toward the center, indicative of the preferential intercalation through the edges14. With further decrease in the MoS2 potential, in contrast to the sealed-edge MoS2, the color change exhibited non-uniform distribution with two open edges darker than the center of the flake. Furthermore, the color was not recovered when the potential was increased back to 3.5 V. The process was not reversible even when we stopped at a relatively higher potential (e.g., 1.1 V or 1.0 V) (Supplementary Fig. 2)14. We attribute the reversible intercalation in sealed-edge MoS2 to three reasons: (1) the flake was clamped and stabilized by the surrounding electrodes preventing structural deformation at the edges of the flake; (2) the diffusion pathways on the top surface are uniformly distributed and mechanically inextensible, which naturally control the intercalation homogeneity compared with the intercalation through the edges where all ions flooded into the opening van der Waals gaps; and (3) the relatively low intercalation rate of sealed-edge MoS2 may cause less lattice distortion and expansion. Although these factors cannot be separated, we believe the mechanical stabilization from surrounding Au electrode contributes more to the reversibility. Because the diffusion pathways on the top surface are naturally present in the MoS2 flakes, and these can only be triggered when all the edges are sealed.

Fig. 2
figure2

Li intercalation of MoS2 through the top surface and edges. ab In situ optical microscopy images of Li intercalation into MoS2 through top surface and edges, respectively. Scale bars, 5 µm. c-d In situ Raman spectra of Li intercalation into MoS2 with sealed edge and open edge, respectively. e Three cycles of in situ Raman spectra of Li intercalation MoS2 with sealed edge. The voltages were with respect to Li/Li+

We performed in situ Raman spectroscopy to compare the changes in MoS2 during Li+ intercalation for sealed-edge and open-edge configurations. At 3.5 V, both the Raman spectra showed two peaks located at ~384 and 408 cm−1, corresponding to the \(E_{2g}^1\) (in-plane optical vibrations of the Mo–S bond) and A1g (out-of-plane optical vibration of S atoms) modes of MoS2 (Fig. 2c, d). Besides the shift of \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g peaks due to gating effect (Supplementary Fig. 3), the Raman spectra did not show obvious change until 1.0 V for sealed-edge MoS2 (Fig. 2c) and 1.1 V for open-edge MoS2 (Fig. 2d). Below these critical potential values, the spectra exhibited significant change and two pronounced differences can be observed by comparing the two sets of Raman spectra. First, the emergence of the new Raman modes at 154, 164, and 207 cm−1, often associated with the 2 H to 1 T phase transition11,14,33, occurs at higher potentials (~0.9 V) for open-edge MoS2 than for sealed-edge MoS2 (~0.8 V). Second, the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes were largely restored and well-defined for the sealed-edge MoS2 after de-intercalation; in contrast, the same two Raman peaks of the open-edge nearly disappear after de-intercalation. These observations were consistent with the differences shown in the optical images and confirmed that sealed-edge MoS2 can show stable and reversible intercalation. By carefully comparing the peak positions of the Raman modes of 1 T phase, we found that the degree of Li intercalation in open-edge MoS2 was slightly higher than that of the sealed-edge MoS2. This is due to the lower energy barrier for intercalation in open-edge MoS2, which makes it hard to control the intercalation process and partially accounts for the irreversibility. Still, even for the sealed-edge MoS2, the modes dropped in intensity (to ~20% of the pristine MoS2) and showed a broadened line-width, which was likely due to the presence of residual strains34.

To further demonstrate the robustness of the sealed-edge MoS2 geometry, in situ Raman spectra corresponding to the three cycles of intercalation and de-intercalation were recorded (Fig. 2e). These spectra were highly reproducible showing well-defined \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes before intercalation and after de-intercalation, as well as the new Raman modes around 170 and 220 cm−1 after intercalation. In addition, we found both the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes can be clearly identified for up to the 20 cycles of Li intercalation and de-intercalation processes (Supplementary Fig. 4), indicating the crystalline stability of sealed-edge MoS2. Furthermore, control experiments with MoS2 flake covered completely by the Au electrodes showed no signature of ion intercalation (Supplementary Fig. 5); this verifies that the Au electrodes can effectively seal the edges of MoS2 and the ions indeed go through the top surface in sealed MoS2. Previous research also showed the metal electrodes could block the entry of Li+ from the edges14. Finally, to examine the uniformity of the intercalation from the top surface, we performed a series of Raman measurements on sealed-edge MoS2 flakes (1) on SiO2/Si substrate with the Si Raman peak as reference and (2) on quartz substrate from the backside accessing the bottom surface (Supplementary Fig. 6). We found that the representative Raman peaks of Si substrate were explicitly observed for all the intercalation voltages, which indicates that the excitation laser light has totally penetrated the MoS2 flake and reached Si substrate (Supplementary Fig. 6a). For the intercalated state, the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g peaks of pristine MoS2 were completely undetectable, while the intensity of Si peak remained unchanged. Thus, we can confirm that the sealed-edge MoS2 flake was uniformly intercalated through the top surface. We also fabricated the sealed-edge MoS2 device on a transparent quartz substrate and carried out the Raman measurements by illuminating the excitation laser light through the bottom of the substrate directly onto the sealed-edge MoS2 flake. When the sample was intercalated, no intrinsic \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g peaks of pristine MoS2 could be detected, further confirming the uniformity of the intercalation of MoS2 flake from top surface (Supplementary Fig. 6b).

Selective ion intercalation through the top surface

To study the ion-selectivity of intercalation through the top surface of the MoS2, we tested intercalation of other alkali ions including Na+ and K+ into MoS2 (Fig. 3). The optical images showed very uniform color change upon Na+ intercalation and de-intercalation for sealed-edge MoS2 (Fig. 3a). In this study, we used NaCoO2 as the counter electrode to provide Na+ source and the OCV of MoS2 vs. NaCoO2 is ~0 V (the potential of NaCoO2 with respect to Na/Na+ is ~3.2 V). When the potential of MoS2 was lowered to ~−2.4 V, the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes shifted and diminished while the new modes ~150 and 200 cm−1 emerged (Fig. 3e). Intercalation of Na+ at ~−2.4 V vs. NaCoO2 here (corresponding to ~0.8 V vs. Na/Na+) is believed to fall on the second discharge plateau28. When the potential of MoS2 was increased back to ~−1.5 V vs. NaCoO2, the Raman spectrum changed back to that of pristine MoS2. In contrast to the intercalation of Li+, the changes in both color and Raman spectra were also observed to be reversible for the open-edge configuration (Fig. 3c, f). The consistent observation of reversible changes in the color and Raman spectra (analogous to Li+ intercalation (Fig. 2)) demonstrated successful intercalation of the Na+ ion from the top surface into the sealed-edge MoS2. The relatively uniform intercalation of Na+ into open-edge MoS2 was surprising because Na+ (~1.16 Å) is larger than Li+ (~0.9 Å) in size. Based on the comparison of Raman spectra (Fig. 2d and Fig. 3f), this is probably because unlike Li+, the intercalation of Na+ did not induce a large structural deformation. In addition, we note that among all alkali metals, Na has relative weak chemical binding to various substrates including MoS235.

Fig. 3
figure3

Selective intercalation from the top surface of sealed-edge MoS2. a In situ optical microscopy images show uniform color change of MoS2 upon Na+ intercalation and de-intercalation for sealed-edge MoS2 through the top surface. b The color of MoS2 remains unchanged when lowering the potential from 3 V to 0 V, indicating that K+ cannot intercalate through the top surface of sealed-edge MoS2. c-d In situ optical microscopy images show prominent color changes due to Na+ and K+ intercalation through the edges of MoS2. Scale bars in a-d, 5 µm. e-f In situ Raman spectra demonstrate Na+ intercalates into both sealed-edge MoS2 and open-edge MoS2. g-h In situ Raman spectra demonstrate K+ does not intercalate into sealed-edge MoS2 but intercalate into open-edge MoS2. The voltages in a, c, e, and f were with respect to NaCoO2. The voltages in b, d, g, h were with respect K/K+

On the other hand, no noticeable change was observed in the optical images upon the attempt to intercalate K+ into sealed MoS2 (Fig. 3b). The Raman spectra with different potential of MoS2 vs. K metal from OCV (~3.0 V) to as low as 0 V maintained the same except the very slight peak shift due to the gating effect as in the Li+ case, indicating no K+ intercalation into the sealed MoS2 (Fig. 3g). We suspect that this is due to the large size of K+ (~1.52 Å) compared with Na+ and Li+. In contrast to the sealed-edge configuration, the intercalation of K+ into open-edge MoS2 occurred when we lowered the potential of MoS2 vs. K metal from OCV (~3.0 V) to ~1.1 V (Fig. 3d). This is as expected because the large interlayer spacing (~0.615 nm) of MoS2 can accommodate K+ ions (~1.52 Å) when they intercalate from the edges. Still, for this open-edge MoS2, the color showed a non-uniform change and only partially recovered to its original state, as in the case of Li+ intercalation. In situ Raman spectra showed shift and diminish of the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes and appearance of the new Raman modes ~140 and 190 cm−1 after intercalation (Fig. 3h), which was consistent with the observations in the optical images. After de-intercalation, the \(E_{2g}^1\) and A1g Raman modes shifted back with a drastically reduced intensity compared with that of the pristine MoS2. In addition, we show that K+ intercalated from the open edges and then extended into sealed areas of the same flake, which provide further evidence that K+ does not intercalate from the top surface of MoS2 (Supplementary Fig. 7).

Analysis of intercalation pathways through the top surface

Our results have demonstrated that Li+ and Na+, but not K+, can be successfully intercalated into sealed-edge MoS2 through the top surface. To uncover the underlying mechanism, we propose that Li+ and Na+ intercalate through the natural defects36,37 into sealed-edge MoS2. We test our hypothesis by comparing the energy barriers for alkali ions to penetrate a monolayer MoS2 with and without defects using density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. 4a). In experiment, an initial applied potential drives alkali ions to accumulate on the top of MoS2 surface, and these alkali ions maintain their ionic state during the intercalation and de-intercalation. In addition, due to the inversion symmetry of monolayer MoS2, the kinetics dominate over the thermodynamics in the process of intercalation. Therefore, the nudged elastic band method that is widely used to study the kinetic effect in electrochemical reaction38 is employed here. In previous research, several types of intrinsic point defects have been studied in monolayer MoS2 both theoretically and experimentally, including the single S vacancy (VS), the double S vacancy (VS2), single Mo vacancy (VMo), and etc39. We first calculated the formation energy for all types of defects and found that VS, VS2, and VMo have relatively low formation energies (Supplementary Fig. 8), which are consistent with previous results39. Therefore, we only considered these three types of intrinsic defects and calculated the energy barriers and diffusion pathway for the intercalation of alkaline ions (Li+, Na+, K+) through these intrinsic defects systematically. Intercalation of alkaline ions through the perfect MoS2 was also considered for comparison. Figure 4b summarizes the energy barriers for Li+, Na+, and K+ to penetrate through perfect MoS2 and MoS2 with VS, VS2, and VMo vacancies, respectively. In the perfect MoS2 monolayer, the energy barriers were 4.03 eV, 8.32 eV, and 13.22 eV for intercalation of Li+, Na+, and K+ through the top surface, respectively. In the presence of VS and VS2 vacancies, these values did not change significantly. In contrast, the energy barriers were significantly reduced when Li+, Na+, and K+ penetrate through the MoS2 monolayer with Mo vacancy, which were 1.30 eV, 0.79 eV, and 2.46 eV, respectively. These energy barriers for Li+ and Na+ to penetrate through MoS2 is comparable with the potential change (difference between OCV and intercalation voltage) in our experiments (1.30 eV vs. ~ 2.2 V and 0.79 eV vs. ~ 2.4 V). In contrast, the energy barrier for K+ to go through VMo is much larger (2.46 eV) compared with Li+ and Na+, explaining the unsuccessful intercalation of K+ even with ~3.0 V potential change in experiment. Therefore, we believe that the Mo vacancy plays an important role when the alkaline ions intercalate into MoS2 through the top surface (see Supplementary Figs. 915 for details).

Fig. 4
figure4

DFT calculations for alkali ions penetration through MoS2. a Schematic representation of alkali–ion intercalation through a single MoS2 layer. The intercalation pathways allow the penetration of Li+ and Na+ while block K+. b Energy barriers for penetration through perfect MoS2 (navy blue) and MoS2 with VS (dark green), VS2, (purple) and VMo (red) for Li+, Na+, and K+, respectively

We checked our MoS2 flakes using high-angle annular dark-field scanning tunneling electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and were able to observe strongly reduced brightness at certain Mo sites, which probably indicate the presence of Mo vacancies (Supplementary Fig. 16). Previous scanning tunneling microscopy study has also reported Mo-like vacancies in the MoS2 flakes36. Moreover, comprehensive investigations on the defects of monolayer MoS2 through high-resolution STEM have elucidated that the density of VMo is ~0.004 nm−2(ref 40). In contrast, the dominant sulfur vacancies and disulfur vacancies were reported to have higher densities (density of Vs ~0.12 nm−2 and VS2 ~0.017 nm−2)40. Besides the vacancy defects mentioned above, vacancy complex of Mo and three close-by sulfur atoms or disulfur pairs (VMoS3 or VMoS6) were occasionally observed in MoS2, but the density of VMoS6 was much lower than that of VMo, and VMoS3 was too low to be counted40. We include both the energy barrier for intercalation and the density of the vacancies in our analysis. Considering the energy barriers for the intercalation of Li+, Na+, and K+ through VS (VS2) are, respectively, 4.03 eV (4.51 eV), 8.32 eV (7.53 eV), and 13.22 eV (9.14 eV) and those through VMo are, respectively, 1.30 eV, 0.79 eV, and 2.46 eV, the relatively lower energy barriers of VMo are the determinant factor to induce the intercalation through top surface, although the density of VMo is lower than VS and VS2. In the case of VMoS6, however, the extremely low density may dominate and make the intercalation unlikely, although the calculated energy barriers for the intercalation of Li+, Na+, and K+ through VMoS6 are only 0.62 eV, 0.65 eV, and 1.24 eV, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 17). This argument is supported by our experimental observation that K ions are always rejected by the surface intercalation pathways. Therefore, we believe the most preferential intercalation pathway through top surface is from the VMo. Furthermore, we would like to emphaize that the real situation in the experiments is more complicated. First, the VS, VS2, and VMo may co-exsit and the S vacancies can lead to formation of Mo vacancies; second, the vacancies can evolve during intercalation due to the insertion of the ions. Nevertheless, the DFT calculations confirm that it is feasible to intercalate through the top surface into the few-layer MoS2 and the intercalation has selectivity.

Reversible control of optical and electrical properties

Both the in situ optical microscopy and Raman spectroscopy results show the high reversibility and stability of the intercalation from the top surface of the few-layer MoS2. Finally, we demonstrate the reversible control of both optical and electrical properties of few-layer MoS2 as a first step toward applications in optoelectronics and nanoelectronics devices (Fig. 5). Since Li+ intercalation of 2D MoS2 has been well-studied13,14, we focused on Na+ intercalation here. We first measured the reflectance spectra of the MoS2 flakes upon Na+ intercalation, which can also quantify the subtle color change in the optical images (Fig. 5a). For the pristine flake, two reflectance dips were observed at ~1.86 eV and 2.02 eV (red line at bottom, Fig. 5b), as a result of enhanced absorption in the MoS2 by the A and B excitons. These well-characterized excitons correspond to the prominent transitions between the maxima of split valence bands and the minimum of the conduction band, located at the K point of the Brillouin zone41,42. As we gradually lowered the potential of MoS2 vs. NaCoO2 to −2.6 V, excitonic transition B exhibited a minor blue-shift and a clear damping in intensity, due to the decrease in exciton binding energy resulted from the doped-free electrons43,44. The change in excitonic transition A also showed indication of damping upon ion intercalation, while this was more difficult to identify because it overlaped with a broad background Fabry–Pérot resonance in the MoS2–SiO2–Si layer stack (Supplementary Fig. 18). We performed analytical transfer-matrix calculations of the experimental geometry to resolve the Fabry–Pérot resonance besides both excitonic transitions (Supplementary Fig. 18). When we increased the potential of MoS2, the spectral shifts and intensity change are both fully reversed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that optical properties of MoS2 were electrically manipulated via Na+ intercalation, which shows reversible and reproducible tuning over multiple cycles (Fig. 5c). Identical observations were found in the case of Li+ intercalation (Supplementary Fig. 19).

Fig. 5
figure5

Reversible control of optical and electrical properties of MoS2 via Na+ intercalation. a Schematic of the optical measurement. b Gradual reflectance change of MoS2 on SiO2/Si via Na+ intercalation (spectra offset for visibility). From bottom red line to middle blue line: Na+ intercalation; top red line: Na+ de-intercalation. c Three cycles of reflectance change of MoS2 on SiO2/Si via Na+ intercalation. d The potential dependence of source-drain current within three intercalation/de-intercalation cycles. The bias between source and drain was VSD = 20 mV at room temperature. The potential of MoS2 was swept from 0 V to −2.6 V and back to 0 V (vs. NaCoO2 counter electrode) for three cycles at a constant rate of 2 mV s−1. The black and red arrows indicate the sweeping directions. The inset shows the device. Scale bar, 5 µm. e The resistivity of MoS2 flake (5.5 nm) with standard Hall-bar geometry. The potential of MoS2 was applied at 300 K. The device was then continuously cooled down to 2 K with fixed voltages. f The corresponding two-dimensional electron densities at different potentials and temperatures. The inset shows the device used in (e) and (f). Scale bar, 5 µm

Next, we performed in situ electric transport measurements to show the highly tunable electrical properties via ion intercalation. We note that it is challenging to find an insulating material with high malleability, electrochemical stability, and high affinity to seal MoS2 edges for the electrical measurements at this point (Supplementary Fig. 20). Since Na+ intercalation through top surface and edges were equally reversible (Fig. 3), we employed open-edge configuration to simplify the device geometry. For the two-contact device shown in Fig. 3c, the drain-to-source current increased dramatically when the potential of MoS2 was continuously swept from 0 V to −2.6 V with respective to NaCoO2 counter electrode (Fig. 5d), because of the intercalation of Na+ ions into MoS2. When the potential was returned to around −2.0 V, the current dropped rapidly due to the extraction of Na+ ions from MoS2. Besides the current hysteresis between −1.6 V to −2.6 V arising from the over-potential effect, the current curves nearly overlapped with each other in the non-intercalated state (from 0 V to −1.6 V), which implied the restored semiconducting phase of de-intercalated MoS2. Moreover, the current consistency of three cycles demonstrated the stability of electrical properties after Na+ ion intercalation. To eliminate the effect of contact resistance and study the intrinsic transport properties, we fabricated another device with standard Hall-bar geometry and changed the applied potentials only at 300 K, higher than the ineffective temperature of electrolyte (Supplementary Fig. 21). The four-probe resistivity (Fig. 5e) reduced exponentially till nearly saturated due to the surface charging from electric-double-layer effect when the potential of MoS2 was continuously swept from −0.8 V to −2.3 V. As the sample was cooled down, all the resistivity decreased and displayed metallic behavior down to 2 K. When the Na+ ions were intercalated at the potential of −2.6 V, the resistivity decreased by an order of magnitude compared with that prior to the intercalation at −2.3 V. From the Hall effect measurements (Supplementary Fig. 22), we found that the electron density at −2.3 V can reach 1×1014 cm−2 at 2 K (Fig. 5f), consistent with that in ionic-liquid gated MoS29,45. After Na+ intercalation, the electron density was increased up to 1.7×1016 cm−2, which was two orders higher than those reported using dielectric gating or liquid gating8,9. In 3D, it corresponds to 3×1022 cm−3 and Na1.6MoS2 in molecular formula by assuming one Na atom contributed one electron to the rigid MoS2 host. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest charge-carrier density ever achieved in doped MoS2. Here, we use Na+ intercalation in open-edge MoS2 to show highly tunable and reversible electrical properties through ion intercalation, and the results can be extrapolated to Li+ or Na+ intercalation in sealed-edge configurations which should show even more stable performances. The reversible electrochemical control of the optical and electric performances of few layer MoS2 opens a new route to design highly tunable and stable 2D material-based optoelectronic and nanoelectronic devices.

Discussion

In summary, we demonstrate that Li+ and Na+ ions can intercalate into few-layer MoS2 through the top surface with strongly improved control, reversibility, and stability compared with intercalation through edges. We note intercalation through top surface also applies to other similar 2D layered material systems such as MoSe2 (Supplementary Fig. 23). This finding is significant because electrochemical control is a powerful approach to manipulate the properties of low-dimensional materials; stable intercalation and reversible cycling are essential for accurate in situ interrogation of the physical and chemical changes during intercalation. In future, sealing the edges of 2D materials with dielectrics will allow the design of complex and tunable nanoelectronic devices with high performance and high stability. In addition, voltage-controlled selective intercalation through the top surface of the 2D materials holds great potential in developing novel ionic sieving devices that have distinct open/close (on/off) controllability via a gate voltage applied on the 2D material, besides the size and charge selectivity from common nanofiltration and desalination membranes.

Methods

Device fabrication

Thin MoS2 flakes (<10 nm) were exfoliated using the Scotch tape method onto 300-nm-thick SiO2/Si substrate, and electrodes (Ti/Au, 3/50 nm) were designed and patterned on flakes by electron-beam lithography and deposited by e-beam evaporation. A marker array was used for precise alignment of the electrodes to the selected flakes. The MoS2 sample was then transferred to an Ar-filled glovebox for cell assembly. In the case of Li+ and K+ intercalation, Li/K metal was cold pressed onto Cu foil as the counter electrode; in the case of Na+ intercalation, NaCoO2 was deposited onto an Al foil as the counter electrode. These electrodes were then sealed between a cover glass and the SiO2/Si substrate with evaporated Ti/Au electrode, using hot melt sealing film (Meltonix 1170–60, Solaronix), leaving two little openings for liquid electrolyte filling. There is a ~50 μm gap between the glass and the SiO2/Si substrate, which is then occupied by the corresponding electrolytes. The electrolytes were 1 M LiPF6, NaPF6, KPF6 in EC/DEC for Li+, Na+, and K+ intercalation, respectively. After filling the electrolyte by capillary effect, the two openings were sealed by using epoxy.

Electrochemical intercalation

Electrochemical intercalation was performed with a Keithley 2400 sourcemeter. Constant voltage charge and discharge were used to intercalate and de-intercalate MoS2 flakes for in situ optical and Raman measurements.

Transport measurements

The room temperature current between drain and source was recorded by using the Keithley 2400 sourcemeter, while another Keithley 2400 sourcemeter was used to apply charge and discharge voltage between the source and counter electrode. The low temperature transport measurements were carried out in Quantum Design PPMS-7 instrument, Janis 9 T magnet He-cryostats (base temperature 2 K), using low-frequency (5–20 Hz) AC technique by digital lock-in amplifiers (Stanford Research Systems SR830) with current-driven configuration. The charge-carrier densities were derived from Hall effect measurements.

Raman spectroscopy

The MoS2 flakes were characterized using HORIBA Scientific LabRAM HR Evoluation spectrometer, with 532 nm excitation and 1800 l/mm grating. The background signals from electrolyte, cover glass, and substrates were subtracted.

Optical measurement and simulations

Optical reflection spectra were measured using a Nikon C1 confocal microscope. Unpolarized broadband excitation from a halogen lamp and a 50 × long working distance objective (NA = 0.55) were used to illuminate the sample through the cover slip. A 30-μm pinhole was used to spatially select the reflection off the flakes, and a Princeton Instruments SpectraPro 2300i (150 l/mm, blazed at 500 nm) and PIXIS CCD camera were used to measure the spectrum. A protected silver mirror (Thorlabs) was used as a reference to correct for the system response.

DFT calculations

The spin-polarized density functional theory (DFT) calculations were implemented in the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)46,47. The projected augmented wave48,49 and Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional50,51 were used to describe the electron–ion interaction and exchange-correlation energy, respectively. The cutoff energy was set to 500 eV. Because of the layered structures of MoS2, the empirical correction method proposed by Grimme (DFT-D3) was used to simulate the van der Waals interaction52,53. In order to understand the intercalation process, a supercell consisting of 5×5 repeating unit cells of MoS2 monolayer was used, and a vacuum layer was larger than 15 Å to eliminate the spurious interaction between adjacent MoS2 layers. 3 × 3 × 1 Γ-centered k-points was used to sample the Brillouin zones of supercell. For each model, the structure was allowed to fully relax until the energy converged to 10−5eV and the residual force converged to 0.01 eV/Å per atom. The climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method54 was applied to search for the transition state and determine the migration barrier of alkaline ions through the MoS2 monolayer.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Wu, S. et al. Monolayer semiconductor nanocavity lasers with ultralow thresholds. Nature 520, 69–72 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lopez-Sanchez, O., Lembke, D., Kayci, M., Radenovic, A. & Kis, A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotech 8, 497–501 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotech 6, 147–150 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hu, S. et al. Proton transport through one-atom-thick crystals. Nature 516, 227–230 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Surwade, S. P. et al. Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat. Nanotech 10, 459–464 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotech 7, 699–712 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chhowalla, M. et al. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 5, 263–275 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wang, F. et al. Gate-variable optical transitions in graphene. Science 320, 206–209 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ye, J. T. et al. Superconducting dome in a gate-tuned band insulator. Science 338, 1193–1196 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    David, L., Bhandavat, R. & Singh, G. MoS2/graphene composite paper for sodium-ion battery electrodes. ACS Nano 8, 1759–1770 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, H. et al. Electrochemical tuning of vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and its application in improving hydrogen evolution reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 19701–19706 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, Y. et al. Electrochemical control of photoluminescence in two-dimensional MoS2 nanoflakes. ACS Nano 7, 10083–10093 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wan, J. et al. in situ investigations of Li‐MoS2 with planar batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401742 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiong, F. et al. Li intercalation in MoS2: in situ observation of its dynamics and tuning optical and electrical properties. Nano. Lett. 15, 6777–6784 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wan, J. et al. Tuning two-dimensional nanomaterials by intercalation: materials, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 6742–6765 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gong, Y. et al. Spatially controlled doping of two-dimensional SnS2 through intercalation for electronics. Nat. Nanotech 13, 294–299 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, Y., Xu, Z., Zhan, J., Li, P. & Gao, C. Superb electrically conductive graphene fibers via doping strategy. Adv. Mater. 28, 7941–7947 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2. Nat. Nanotech 10, 270 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yao, J. et al. Optical transmission enhacement through chemically tuned two-dimensional bismuth chalcogenide nanoplates. Nat. Commun. 5, 5670 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ou, J. Z. et al. Ion-driven photoluminescence modulation of Quasi-two-dimensional MoS2 nanoflakes for applications in biological systems. Nano. Lett. 14, 857–863 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Koski, K. J. et al. Chemical intercalation of zerovalent metals into 2D layered Bi2Senanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13773–13779 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Khrapach, I. et al. Novel highly conductive and transparent graphene‐based conductors. Adv. Mater. 24, 2844–2849 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cha, J. J. et al. Two-dimensional chalcogenide nanoplates as tunable metamaterials via chemical intercalation. Nano. Lett. 13, 5913–5918 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao, S. Y. F. et al. Controlled electrochemical intercalation of graphene/h-BN van der Waals heterostructures. Nano. Lett. 18, 460–466 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bao, W. et al. Approaching the limits of transparency and conductivity in graphitic materials through lithium intercalation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4224 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang, R. et al. Superconductivity in potassium-doped metallic polymorphs of MoS2. Nano. Lett. 16, 629–636 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lacey, S. D. et al. Atomic force microscopy studies on molybdenum disulfide flakes as sodium-ion anodes. Nano. Lett. 15, 1018–1024 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Park, J. et al. Discharge mechanism of MoS2 for sodium ion battery: electrochemical measurements and characterization. Electrochim. Acta 92, 427–432 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim, H. W. et al. Selective gas transport through few-layered graphene and graphene oxide membranes. Science 342, 91–95 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, H. et al. Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342, 95–98 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Abraham, J. et al. Tunable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotech 12, 546–550 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xiao, J. et al. Exfoliated MoS2 nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 22, 4522–4524 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lukowski, M. A. et al. Enhanced hydrogen evolution catalysis from chemically exfoliated metallic MoS2 nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10274–10277 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zhang, L. et al. Electrochemical reaction mechanism of the MoS2 electrode in a lithium-ion cell revealed by in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Nano. Lett. 18, 1466–1475 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Liu, Y., Merinov, B. V. & Goddard, W. A. Origin of low sodium capacity in graphite and generally weak substrate binding of Na and Mg among alkali and alkaline earth metals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 3735–3739 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Addou, R., Colombo, L. & Wallace, R. M. Surface defects on natural MoS2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 11921–11929 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vancsó, P. et al. The intrinsic defect structure of exfoliated MoS2 single layers revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 29726 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Skúlason, E. et al. Density functional theory calculations for the hydrogen evolution reaction in an electrochemical double layer on the Pt(111) electrode. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 3241–3250 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhou, W. et al. Intrinsic structural defects in monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nano. Lett. 13, 2615–2622 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hong, J. et al. Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers. Nat. Commun. 6, 197 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. & Heinz, T. F. Atomically thin MoS2: a new direct-gap semiconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Splendiani, A. et al. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2. Nano. Lett. 10, 1271–1275 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mak, K. F. et al. Tightly bound trions in monolayer MoS2. Nat. Mater. 12, nmat3505–211 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Newaz, A. K. M. et al. Electrical control of optical properties of monolayer MoS2. Solid State Commun. 155, 49–52 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lu, J. M. et al. Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2. Science 350, 1353–1357 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput Mate Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

  47. 47.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M. & Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982–9985 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys.  113, 9901–9904 (2000).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering (contract no. DE-AC02–76SF00515). This work was also supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFB0701600 and 2014CB932400), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11874036) and Shenzhen Projects for Basic Research (Grant No. JCYJ20170412171430026). Tianjin Supercomputing Center is acknowledged for allowing the use of computational resources including TIANHE-1. J.G. and M.L.B. acknowledge support from the Department of Energy Grant DE-FG07-ER46426. Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-1542152. J.Z. and A.Y. acknowledge helpful discussions with Dr. Xiao-Xiao Zhang.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Z., A.Y., and Y.C. designed research. J.Z., A.Y. fabricated devices and performed optical microscopy and Raman spectroscopy measurements. X.W., P.T., J.L., and S.C.Z. performed DFT calculations and theoretical analysis. J.G., A.Y., Q.L., and M.L.B performed optical measurement and simulations. J.Z. and S.L. performed transport measurements. B.L., F.S., J.W., Y.S., Z.L., G.Z., and C.-L.W. contributed to the sample fabrication and processing. X.Z. performed STEM measurement. A.Y., J.Z., P.T., J.G., and Y.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors participated in discussions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Cui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Yang, A., Wu, X. et al. Reversible and selective ion intercalation through the top surface of few-layer MoS2. Nat Commun 9, 5289 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07710-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing