Abstract
Dynamics of domain walls are among the main features that control strain mechanisms in ferroic materials. Here, we demonstrate that the domainwallcontrolled piezoelectric behaviour in multiferroic BiFeO_{3} is distinct from that reported in classical ferroelectrics. In situ Xray diffraction was used to separate the electricfieldinduced lattice strain and strain due to displacements of non180° domain walls in polycrystalline BiFeO_{3} over a wide frequency range. These piezoelectric strain mechanisms have opposing trends as a function of frequency. The lattice strain increases with increasing frequency, showing negative piezoelectric phase angle (i.e., strain leads the electric field), an unusual feature so far demonstrated only in the total macroscopic piezoelectric response. Domainwall motion exhibits the opposite behaviour, it decreases in magnitude with increasing frequency, showing more common positive piezoelectric phase angle (i.e., strain lags behind the electric field). Charge redistribution at conducting domain walls, oriented differently in different grain families, is demonstrated to be the cause.
Introduction
Ferroic domain walls are naturally occurring nanoscale interfaces that can possess distinct properties from their parent materials^{1,2,3}. Due to their lengthscale, they have generated great interest for applications such as domainwall nanoelectronics^{2,3,4,5,6}. The ferroelectric material BiFeO_{3} has been demonstrated to possess enhanced electrical conductivity at domain walls (relative to the inner domain away from the domain walls)^{2}. This material also displays Maxwell–Wagnerlike frequency dispersion in its macroscopic piezoelectric response^{7}. This dispersion is different from a prototypical frequency dependent behaviour of the piezoelectric coefficient in classical ferroelectric materials, such as soft Pb(Zr_{x}Ti_{1−x})O_{3} (PZT). In PZT, the piezoelectric response exhibits a linearlogarithmic dependence, that is interpreted by fieldinduced motion of ferroelectric and ferroelastic domain walls in a medium with random pinning centres^{8}. The Maxwell–Wagnerlike frequency dispersion in bulk polycrystalline BiFeO_{3} has been suggested to be originated from the conductive domain walls^{7}.
Maxwell–Wagnerlike dispersion of the piezoelectric coefficient, similar to that shown for BiFeO_{3}, has been previously observed in polymer–polymer and polymer–ferroelectric composites^{9,10,11} and several ferroelectrics with Aurivillius structures^{12}. The Maxwell–Wagner effect^{13}, i.e., charge accumulation and its decay at interfaces between constituent components with different dielectric and electric conduction properties inside a material, can be easily understood for layered Aurivillius structures with strongly anisotropic conductivity and in heterogeneous systems such as composites^{12}. However, in polycrystalline ferroelectrics with perovskite structures such as BiFeO_{3}, where significant anisotropy in the bulk conductivity is not expected, the reasons for Maxwell–Wagner effects are not so obvious. Moreover, the macroscopic Maxwell–Wagnerlike piezoelectric dispersion in BiFeO_{3}^{7} is unique from that previously observed in other materials. This reflects in the remarkable nonlinearity with respect to the driving field amplitude at low frequencies (<10 Hz) and the negative piezoelectric phase angle (phase leading) at weak fields (i.e., the piezoelectric strain response leads the driving electric field). Pivotal to future applications not only of BiFeO_{3} but also other oxides exhibiting domain wall conduction is a thorough understanding of the origins of these behaviours and their relation to conductive domain walls.
In polycrystalline ferroelectric materials, the converse piezoelectric response to an applied electric field has its origin in several structural features, for example, small displacements of atoms under external fields in the crystal unit cell, i.e., the lattice strain, motion of non180° domain walls resulting in a change in ferroelectric/ferroelastic domain texture, and electricfieldinduced phase transformations. Methods for quantification of lattice and domain wall motion induced strains have been previously used to investigate the strain response of polycrystalline materials^{14,15}. Unlike thin films^{16}, bulk BiFeO_{3} does not undergo crystallographic phase transformations under fields approaching the breakdown field of the material^{17} and thus strain due to lattice distortion and motion of non180° domain walls are the majority contributors to its macroscopic piezoelectric response. These strain mechanisms in other ferroelectrics, as observed by in situ Xray diffraction (XRD) fielddependent measurement on PZT and PbTiO_{3}–BiScO_{3}, are considered to be interdependent and coupled through intergranular elastic constraints between neighbouring grains or within clusters of grains^{18,19,20}. Reports on the frequency dispersion of individual strain mechanisms are limited. Previous work on PZT^{21} and 36%BiScO_{3}–64%PbTiO_{3}^{22} materials showed decreased domain wall motion with increasing frequency. However, lattice strain is either not provided or is independent of frequency.
Here we demonstrate by using timeresolved in situ XRD and analytical modelling that the distinct frequency dependent piezoelectric behaviour in polycrystalline BiFeO_{3} is due to conducting domain walls. By experimentally separating the lattice strain from the change in non180° domain texture over the frequency range from 0.01 to 1000 Hz, we show that the two strain mechanisms in different grain orientations are decoupled as a function of frequency, meaning that the amplitudes of these two strain mechanisms have opposite trends with respect to variation in driving frequency. Surprisingly, the lattice strain increases in magnitude with increasing frequency for grains with a {100}_{pc} direction aligned with the electric field, showing unusual negative piezoelectric phase angle and thus a strain response that leads the external field. This is the first direct observation of a strain mechanism showing phase leading behaviour using the XRD method. In contrast, the strain coming from non180° domain wall motion in {111}_{pc} grains decreases with increasing frequency, showing a more common positive piezoelectric phase angle, meaning lagging of the strain response to the external electric field. In addition to experimental in situ XRD data, we present here an analytical model based on the domain wall conductivity to show the origin of the microscopic strain decoupling as a function of frequency and negative phase angle of the piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3}. Charge redistribution at the domain walls, oriented differently with respect to the applied field vector in different grain families, causes complex timedependent internal electric fields, effectively resulting in redistribution of these fields in different grains. The revealed mechanism may play an important role in ferroelectrics exhibiting significant local variations in electrical conductivity, particularly those characterized by enhanced conduction at domain walls, and thus offers a new approach based on conducting domain walls for influencing the electromechanical properties of ferroelectrics.
Results
In situ timeresolved XRD
Figure 1a displays a representative diffraction pattern integrated from the diffraction image obtained during in situ subcoercive electricfield cycling on poled BiFeO_{3} samples (see Methods). Figure 1b–d shows the profile fitting of selected diffraction peaks using Gaussian functions. No impurity phase was found within the detection limit of the instrument, confirming the high phase purity of the material. The fitted parameters including position of individual peaks (θ_{hkl}) and 111_{pc}/\(11\bar 1_{{\mathrm{pc}}}\) peak intensities, which vary upon field application, were utilized to obtain lattice strains, ε_{hkl}, and non180° domain texture, f_{111}, during the electricfield cycling using following equations:
where the superscript indicates the state of external electric field application (either zero or nonzero field E) and subscript denotes the crystallographic hkl plane. Equation (2) is a multiple of a random distribution (MRD) method used to quantify domain texture for rhombohedral structures^{15}. In contrast to f_{111} = 1 MRD for asprocessed unpoled ceramic, the f_{111} for the initial poled state of the measured sample was 2.5 MRD.
Figure 2a–c shows the driving field, 200_{pc} peak position, and 111_{pc}/11\(\bar 1\)_{pc} peak intensities during the 1 Hz electric field cycle, respectively. The calculated lattice strain from peak positions and f_{111} from the interchange of intensities, using equations (1) and (2), are presented in Fig. 2d and e, respectively. These data are then fitted with a sinusoidal curve to extract the amplitude variation of the electricfieldinduced lattice strains, ε_{hkl}, and changes of the 111_{pc} domain texture, ∆f_{111}, at this specific frequency (the same procedure is used for all frequencies). Changes of lattice strains, ε_{hkl}, from each individual peak (see Supplementary Figure 1), were then combined using a weighted average method to obtain the total lattice strain contribution, ε_{intrinsic}, in the field direction of the sample by the following equation (3)^{14}:
where f_{hkl}(0) is the domain texture along the field direction (i.e., when the angle between applied field vector, E, and scattering vector, q, is 0°) and can be measured using diffraction techniques^{15,23}. The multiplicity factor of (hkl) reflection, m_{hkl}, is the corresponding total number of identically spaced planes.
Figure 3a–c shows in situ total lattice strain, ε_{intrinsic}, change in non180° domain texture, ∆f_{111}, macroscopic strain, ε_{macro}, as measured from sample surface displacement, and tangent of the piezoelectric phase angle, tanδ, as a function of frequency obtained during 6 kV mm^{−1} unipolar electricfield cycling. The macroscopic strain is the field response of the whole bulk sample and thus represents a complex convolution of all strain mechanisms, including lattice strain and local domainwall induced strain from individual grains. Distinct frequency dispersions of the strains are observed in the measured frequency range (Fig. 3a, b).
From Fig. 3a, it can be seen that lattice strain (magenta circles) and change in non180° domain texture (blue diamonds) are decoupled as a function of frequency: they show different trends in their fractional contributions to the macroscopic strain as a function of frequency. The total lattice strain increases with increasing frequency of the field, while the change in non180° domain texture shows a decrease in magnitude with increasing frequency. A clear frequencydependent decoupling of these strain mechanisms occurs at frequencies below ~10 Hz. For frequencies above 10 Hz, the trends with respect to increasing frequency between the two microscopic strain mechanisms are still opposite but strain changes are smaller.
As shown in Fig. 3b, the macroscopic strain decreases from 0.039 to 0.015% with increasing frequency from 0.01 to ~3 Hz. Within experimental error (see Methods), the strain then stabilizes at 0.017% for frequencies above ~6 Hz. The frequency below which the lattice strain, change in domain texture and macrostrain becomes dispersive, i.e., 10 Hz, is consistent with previously reported ex situ macroscopic measurements of the direct and converse piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3}^{7}.
As expected for the field used in this experiment (6 kV mm^{−1}, 0.75 E_{c})^{7}, Fig. 3c (black squares) shows that the phase angle of the macroscopic strain is positive (meaning that the strain lags behind the driving field) and increases as the frequency is decreased below ~0.3 Hz. For all other frequencies measured (>0.3 Hz), tanδ is approximately zero within experimental error. In contrast, the phase angle of the lattice strain is negative for the majority of the frequency range (meaning that strain leads the driving field), with its minimum value at approximately 1 Hz (Fig. 3c, magenta circles). It is worth noting that the negative phase angle was also observed in the direct d_{33} measurements at small unipolar stresses^{24} and in the converse d_{33} with bipolar electric fields when the response is extrapolated to zero field^{7}. At low stresses and electric fields, the negative phase of both the direct and converse macroscopic strain can be related to the observed phase leading of lattice strain directly measured by in situ XRD here. Increasing driving stresses and fields will enhance the domain wall displacements, which results in positive phase angle that then dominates the direct and converse macroscopic responses. All of these different and mutually consistent experiments confirm the presence of negative phase angle in the piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3}. The reproducibility of the negative phase angle of the lattice strain over multiple cycles at frequencies below 1 Hz and over all orientations with respect to the electric field vector E (i.e., the phase angle of lattice strain at all angles between the 200_{pc} diffraction vector q and E) at both low and high frequencies (e.g., 1 and 100 Hz) are demonstrated in Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 2, respectively.
The phase lagging and phase leading of the macroscopic strain and microscopic lattice strain with respect to the driving field, respectively, is demonstrated for the 1 Hz measurement in Fig. 3d. This unusual behaviour (negative phase angle) is physical for the piezoelectric response^{25,26,27} and it has been observed experimentally in systems where conductivities with different time constants occur in different regions of a material^{12}. In those cases, the negative phase angle is a manifestation of the varying electric field distribution in the system during the electric field cycle.
Maxwell–Wagner analytical model and Rayleigh relationship calculations
Charge accumulation and redistribution through local conductive paths in the material can affect the temporal dependence of internal electric fields, leading to the socalled Maxwell–Wagner dielectric^{28} and piezoelectric relaxation^{12,29}. Such dispersive behaviour was previously observed in the macroscopic dielectric^{30} and piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3} ceramics^{7}. To confirm consistency with these previous results, the dielectric permittivity and piezoelectric coefficient were measured on a sample from the same batch as that analysed by the in situ XRD experiments under the same condition (unipolar 6 kV mm^{−1} field). The permittivity was also measured at weaker field amplitude (bipolar 0.02 kV mm^{−1}). All these results clearly and independently confirm a consistent Maxwell–Wagnerlike frequency dispersion in the dielectric and piezoelectric responses (see Supplementary Figures 3–5 and detailed discussion thereof). Considering the above discussion, local regions within the polycrystalline matrix that have dispersive mechanisms with different time constants are likely present in BiFeO_{3}. While this is unexpected in a homogeneous phasepure material with simple perovskite structure where significant anisotropy in the conductivity is not present, the anisotropy in conductivity, as we show next, may be caused by the presence of conducting domain walls.
In BiFeO_{3}, enhanced domain wall conductivity with respect to domain region has been observed in both thin films^{2} and ceramics^{31}. Defects are assumed responsible for the domain wall conductivity by preferentially concentrating in the domain wall region^{31}. These defects in BiFeO_{3} ceramic sintered in O_{2} or air have been identified as bismuth vacancies and Fe^{4+} cations (representing oxidized states of Fe^{3+} cations). This allows ptype hopping conduction at domain walls due to electron holes associated with Fe^{4+} ^{31}. For the same batch of poled material analysed by in situ XRD experiments, the enhanced electrical conductivity at domain walls was confirmed by combined conductive atomic force microscopy (cAFM) and piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) (see Supplementary Figure 6). We thus propose that the conductivity at domain walls plays a key role in the observed frequencydependent strain decoupling, as explained in the model presented here, though other origins of local conductivity, such as that at grain boundaries and/or pores, may also contribute to the effect to some extent^{7}.
Figure 4a, b shows two representative grains that have different crystallographic orientations in rhombohedral polycrystalline BiFeO_{3}, i.e., {100}_{pc} and {111}_{pc}, where the directions represent the crystallographic planes aligned perpendicular to the applied electric field vector. In this figure, the diffracting planes are represented by black dashed lines and the domain walls by blue solid lines. In rhombohedral BiFeO_{3}, 71° domain walls occur on {101}_{pc} planes and 109° on {100}_{pc} planes^{32}. This means that the conductive domain walls of the two representative grain families occur at different angles to the applied field. As an example, Fig. 5 shows one possible orientation of 71° conductive domain walls occurring on (011)_{pc} planes. These domain walls run parallel to the applied external electric field vector in the {100}_{pc} oriented grain family (see Fig. 4 top grain). However, in the {111}_{pc} oriented grain family, (011)_{pc} planes have an angle of 35.26° with (111)_{pc} planes (see Fig. 4 bottom grain), so the angle difference of the conductive path to the applied external electric field vector is 54.74° (Fig. 4a). This difference in the orientation of the conducting walls between various grain orientations of the material, with respect to the external field vector, is what is proposed here to cause a difference in the conductivity between different grains. The difference in the conductivity is responsible for the redistribution of the effective field in each grain, producing Maxwell–Wagnerlike frequency dispersion in an otherwise homogeneous material like BiFeO_{3}.
When an external field is applied, mobile charges in the domain wall region can redistribute via hole hopping. In the case of the {100}_{pc} grain family, where the conducting walls are parallel to the applied field, the driving force for this redistribution is maximized. However, in the {111}_{pc} grain family the domain walls are not parallel to the external field and the driving force is reduced. Thus, the conductivities of two grain families are different. This process is confirmed by the model which is shown next.
The redistribution of electric fields in these grains is analogous to effective fields in circuits where leaky capacitors (i.e., a capacitor and a resistor in parallel) with different capacitance and resistivity are connected in series. We largely simplify the case to a twograin system as shown in Fig. 4, without considering all other grain orientations, different domain clusters within grains, intergranular elastic coupling, the transverse piezoelectric response and elastic compliance of the grains (see Methods). In series connection, the external field over the two grains E_{app} is the weighted sum of the field in the individual grains E_{100} and E_{111} (E_{app} = v_{100}E_{100} + v_{111}E_{111}, where v_{100} and v_{111} is the volume fraction of each grain), while the charge density at the surface of different grains is the same (κ_{100}E_{100} = κ_{111}E_{111}), where κ_{hkl} is dielectric permittivity for each grain. Assuming for simplicity that the only electrical loss mechanism is the conductivity, the complex permittivity can be expressed as \(\kappa _{hkl} = \kappa _{hkl}^\prime  i\sigma _{hkl}/\omega\), where σ_{hkl} is the conductivity in the grain with hkl orientation and ω is the angular frequency of the driving field. These expressions can be used to calculate the effective electric fields for each grain as a function of the frequency and external field, E_{app} (see Methods).
The effective electric fields can then be used to calculate the frequency dependent strain, ε_{hkl}, in each grain using piezoelectric equations^{33}:
The subscripts, hkl, represent the grain orientation with respect to the external field vector. E′ and E″ are the real and imaginary components of the electric field, respectively, d_{100} and d_{111} are the piezoelectric coefficients incorporating the dominant strain mechanisms for {100}_{pc} and {111}_{pc} oriented grains. Due to the orientation of the grain, d_{100} is inhibited from having a domain wall motion component, as the spontaneous strain resolved along the field direction is always the same for all domain orientations. Meanwhile, d_{111} is likely to be dominated by the domain wall motion component and its field and frequency dependence is not considered in equation (5), but is incorporated in a later stage (see equation (8)). The resulting strain is also complex, consisting of a real (ε′) and an imaginary component (ε″).
The phase angles of the strains in different grains can be obtained as:
Adopting an external electric field E_{app} of 6 kV mm^{−1}, d_{100} and d_{111} of 45 and 30 pm V^{−1}, relative permittivity values of κ_{100} = 40 and κ_{111} = 30 and relative conductivity values (with respect to the vaccum permittivity) σ_{100} = 250 and σ_{111} = 100 (see Supplementary Figure 7 and Methods), results of the calculations for different grains from this analytical model are shown in Fig. 5. Figure 5a shows the calculated effective electric fields (see Methods), while Fig. 5b shows the strain response of the two grain orientations over the frequency range of interest using equations (4) and (5). The analytical model reproduces the frequencydependent decoupling of strains in the two grain families (Fig. 5b; 100_{pc} and 111_{pc} strains have opposite trends with decreasing frequency below ~10 Hz), caused by the effective field redistribution (Fig. 5a). The corresponding phase angle of strain response in each grain can be obtained by equations (6) and (7) as given in Fig. 5c. The phase angle shows a negative peak for the {100}_{pc} grain and a positive peak for the {111}_{pc} grain (Fig. 5c). This highlights the leading and lagging of individual strain mechanisms relative to the external electric field. One example of this leading and lagging during an individual electric field cycle is calculated for 1 Hz driving field in Fig. 5d, comparable to the experimental data shown in Figs. 2d, e and 3d.
At low frequencies, the experimental data, Fig. 3b, c, show a large increase in macroscopic strain magnitude and positive phase angle that is not fully accounted for in the Maxwell–Wagner type analytical model. This discrepancy is explained by the frequency dependence of the nonlinearity in the piezoelectric response shown in Supplementary Figure 8. Below 0.3 Hz, the nonlinearity is significant, increasing with decreasing frequency, while at frequencies above 1 Hz the nonlinearity is suppressed. This explains the increase of macroscopic strain at low frequencies (Fig. 3b, <1 Hz). The reason for this behaviour is that domain wall conductivity which we have shown to be active below 1 Hz allows depinning of domain walls, increasing their mobility as shown in ref. ^{7}. This enhanced domain wall motion at low frequencies causes an increasing phase angle as estimated using equation^{34}:
This equation is derived from Rayleigh relationships that describe nonlinear and hysteretic movement of domain walls, where α is the frequencydependent Rayleigh irreversible parameter, E_{max} is the applied field amplitude and d_{33} is the macroscopic piezoelectric coefficient. The calculated Rayleigh phase angle from experimental α (see Supplementary Figure 8) is shown in Fig. 5e. This calculation follows closely to the observed increase in phase angle of the macroscopic strain shown in Fig. 3c.
The Maxwell–Wagner analytical model and Rayleigh relationship applied at low frequencies reproduce the key features of the experimental data over the full frequency range measured, i.e., decoupling of strain mechanisms with frequency, and phase leading of the lattice strain. The frequencydependent decoupling of strains shown here is counterintuitive to the usually assumed interdependence and continuous grain interactions, that cause coupling of the strain mechanisms by intergranular stress between neighbouring grains^{18,19}. More specifically, the frequency dispersion of lattice strain (decrease of lattice strain with decreasing frequency) is distinct from previous reports (frequencyindependent lattice strain)^{22}. Based on the above analytical model, this difference is explained by domain walls in BiFeO_{3} acting as conductive paths. Therefore, shielding of the applied external electric field occurs in given grain families, especially at lower frequencies with more pronounced domain wall motion and charge migration, resulting in the observed decrease of lattice strain with decreasing frequency. Moreover, this phenomenon is accompanied by the phase of the lattice strain leading the external electric field.
Discussions
Electricfieldinduced microscopic strain mechanisms and the macroscopic strain of polycrystalline BiFeO_{3} have been studied as a function of frequency at subcoercive field values to provide insight to the origin of Maxwell–Wagnerlike dispersion in its converse piezoelectric response. Two features of the strain response of BiFeO_{3} are observed, i.e., the frequencydependent decoupling of strain mechanisms (lattice strain and local domain texture) in different grain families and the negative phase angle (phase leading) of the electricfieldinduced lattice strain of {100}_{pc} oriented grains. The latter is the first XRD observation of strain response temporally leading the external stimulus. The reproducibility of these unusual behaviours was confirmed by repeating measurements at 20 Hz on single samples, and over the full frequency range on multiple samples (Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Figures 9, 10). These measurements show that grain interactions in the BiFeO_{3} ceramic are stable during subcoercive electricfield cycling. Breaking of grainscale mechanical coupling, for example by cracking, would be expected to cause large changes in response when measurements are repeated at the same frequencies on single samples and is thus excluded here as a reason for frequencydependent decoupling of microscopic strain mechanisms.
Analytical modelling and the totality of the experimental data show that the Maxwell–Wagner relaxation in the converse piezoelectric response can be due to conductive domain walls in BiFeO_{3} ceramic. Local variations in conductivity, related to orientation of domain walls with respect to the external field in grains, modify the internal field distribution in different grain orientation families. Given the hypothesis that domain wall conductivity is the main reason for the Maxwell–Wagnerlike dispersion, it is foreseeable that the frequency dispersion of piezoelectric properties in BiFeO_{3} can be highly sensitive to processing conditions that impact both defect type and concentration as well as microstructural features. The sensitivity of defect formation when the material is processed under different O_{2} partial pressures and sintering temperatures is known to directly influence the domain wall conductivity in BiFeO_{3} ceramics and thin films^{31,35}. In addition, grain boundaries and pore surfaces, may show conductive properties. However, contributions from these regions are expected to be isotropic and thus they cannot explain the difference in the response magnitude observed in different grain orientation families. Different processing conditions or sintering temperatures would also result in variations in grain size and domain structures, which according to our model, are also expected to affect the frequency dispersion of the piezoelectric response. In our case, to test the reproducibility of XRD measurements and the observed increase of lattice strain with increasing frequency, samples were sintered in a narrow temperature window (between 745 and 780 °C), resulting in similar grain sizes and domain configurations (see Supplementary Figures 11, 12). Accordingly, the frequencydependent behaviour of these samples is qualitatively similar, showing good reproducibility of the in situ results (Supplementary Figure 13).
The present findings help further understanding of grainscale mechanics of polycrystalline piezoelectric materials. It shows that control of domain wall conductivity, for example by adjusting processing atmospheres, may tune the properties of bulk BiFeO_{3}. This plays a role in influencing its macroscopic properties in a far more diverse and important manner than so far considered. Domain wall conductivity has been observed in numerous ferroelectric materials in addition to BiFeO_{3}^{2,35}, including BaTiO_{3} crystals^{36}, KTiOPO_{4} crystals^{37}, YMnO_{3} single crystals^{38,39}, ErMnO_{3} crystals^{40}, LiNbO_{3} single crystals^{41}, and Pb(Zr_{0.2}Ti_{0.8})O_{3} thin films^{42}. It would be interesting to see if those materials can also show the same frequencydependent decoupling between the lattice and non180° domain wall motion generated strain as in BiFeO_{3}. Potential novel applications of conducting domain walls in nanoelectronics have been discussed^{3} and proposed^{4} in the literature. Our findings add a new dimension to nanoengineering conductive domain walls, and thus further the development of domainwallbased nanoelectronics in addition to providing a novel control mechanism for the frequency dependent properties of bulk materials.
Methods
In situ experiments
Highpurity bulk BiFeO_{3} ceramics were prepared by the solid state method utilizing reactive sintering of a mixture of Bi_{2}O_{3} (Alfa Aesar, 99.999%) and Fe_{2}O_{3} (Alfa Aesar, 99.998%) raw powders. A small amount of Co_{3}O_{4} (99%, Alfa Aesar), corresponding to 0.1 wt% of Co, was added to the mixture to reduce the electrical conductivity. The powder was then pressed to pellets uniaxially at 150 MPa. The obtained green pellet was then reactively sintered using tube furnace under different temperatures (745, 760 and 780 °C) to rule out sample variability during in situ XRD experiments.
The assintered ceramics were prepared into disks of 8 mm diameter and 0.5 mm thickness and electroded before being poled using a 12 kV mm^{−1} electric field for 30 min. The measured d_{33} values after poling of the samples were 42 ± 2 pC N^{−1}. Poled BiFeO_{3} ceramics were then cut to dimensions of 1 mm × mm × 0.5 mm suitable for the in situ XRD measurements. The d_{33} of the samples was checked after cutting to ensure no depoling occurred. Subcoercive electric field cycling experiments were performed with a unipolar sinusoidal field of amplitude 6 kV mm^{−1} (0.75 E_{c}) in the poling direction at the following frequencies: 1000, 300, 100, 45, 20, 14, 10, 6, 3, 1, 0.3, 0.1, 0.03, and 0.01 Hz. To obtain the required diffraction statistics for different frequencies, the measured number of cycles for the above frequencies were 2000, 600, 200, 90, 20, 20, 20, 10, 10, 10, 7, 3, 1 and 1, respectively. In general, frequencies where macroscopic strain data was measured for a larger number of cycles have smaller errors, as the fitting of the amplitude and phase could be performed more accurately. After the full cycling sequence, 20 Hz was selected to confirm the repeatability of the measured data and exclude radiation damage effects caused by the Xray beam. Three batches (in total 17 samples) sintered under different temperatures (745, 760 and 780 °C) were used to carry out the in situ experiments.
Highenergy XRD experiments were carried out at beamline ID15A of The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility. A schematic of the experimental setup for ID15A is shown in Fig. 6. Two Xray beam energies were used for the measurements, 78.5 keV (0.15794 Å) and 75 keV (0.16531 Å). A beam size of approximately 200 μm × 200 μm was used.
The samples were mounted in a specifically designed chamber that allows it to be bathed in silicon oil during data collection while the electric field is applied^{43}. The diffraction images were collected in the forward direction (transmission geometry) using a Dectris Pilatus3 X CdTe detector. Cyclic electric fields of different frequencies were generated by a function generator (Fluke PM5136) and amplified using a Trek 10/10 high voltage amplifier. This applied field was hardware synchronised with the framing of the detector diffraction images, such that diffraction information was obtained at specific time points within the electric field cycle. Detector parameters, including sample to detector distances, beam centre and detector tilts, were calibrated using standard cerium dioxide (NIST standard CeO_{2}) in Fit2D^{44}. In this scattering geometry, each diffraction image contains full orientation dependent data of the scattering vector, q, angle with respect to applied electric field vector, E. Segments of the measured images were then integrated into sequential onedimensional diffraction patterns using the calibrated detector information. Peak fitting was done sequentially for further interpretation in Igor Pro 7.0. Errors arising from the fitting of diffraction peaks were propagated through subsequent calculations.
Simultaneously, in situ macroscopic strain was measured using an optical displacement sensor coupled to the top surfaces of the sample. The displacement of the sample surface was used to calculate the macroscopic strain.
Maxwell–Wagner analytical model and its parameters
The Maxwell–Wagner analytical model is a simplification of the real case. To ease the otherwise complex interpretation of field redistribution and microscopic strains decoupling in the polycrystalline matrix of BiFeO_{3}, we did not take into account Rayleighlike behaviour related to domain wall displacements, mechanical boundary conditions and elastic anisotropy, or effects arising from the transverse piezoelectric response. The Rayleigh model is used, however, to interpret the large nonlinear increase in piezoelectric response at low frequencies. Electromechanical coupling among the grains in polycrystalline materials can be in principle added for a more complex and realistic model, for example similar to the one that has been reported by Turik et al.^{29}. Other grain orientations, distributions of conductivities, fractional dynamics^{45} or empirical Havriliak Negami equations could be considered for the complex permittivity of this system. However, the simplified model presented here captures qualitatively very well all essential features of the experimentally observed macroscopic behaviour.
The parameters involved in the analytical model include the dielectric permittivity κ_{hkl}, the electric conductivity σ_{hkl}, the piezoelectric coefficients d_{hkl}, and volume fraction v_{hkl} of two grains with {111}_{pc} and {100}_{pc} orientation with respect to the external field, where hkl represents the grain orientation. These values should reflect realistic physical values for BiFeO_{3}. For {111}_{pc} grain, we use the intrinsic GHz relative dielectric permittivity of BiFeO_{3}, which is ~30 as reported previously^{32}. For {100}_{pc} grains, a higher relative permittivity is used, in this case a value of 40 is adopted for the model, considering that the transverse permittivity of a number of rhombohedral ferroelectrics with a 3 m symmetry (isostructural with BiFeO_{3}) is higher than the longitudinal permittivity^{46}. The asreported bulk electrical conductivity of BiFeO_{3} ceramics and single crystals at room temperature are spread over several orders of magnitude, typically between ~10^{−2} and ~10^{−10} Ω^{−1} m^{−1} ^{32,47,48,49}. The conductivity in the range of 10^{−9}–10^{−10} Ω^{−1} m^{−1} was used in the calculations, consistent with the measured bulk electrical conductivity of our BiFeO_{3} sample as shown in Supplementary Figure 7, and can reproduce the main features of the microscopic strains (the data shown in the main paper are relative conductivity of σ_{111} = 100 and σ_{100} = 250 for {111}_{pc} grain and {100}_{pc} grain, respectively). The piezoelectric coefficient of 30 pm V^{−1} is used for {111}_{pc} grain, and 45 pm V^{−1} is used for {100}_{pc} grain. A higher d_{33} value is used for the {100}_{pc} grain relative to the {111}_{pc} grain for the same reasons as explained for the relative dielectric permittivity.
Redistributed electric fields in different grain families
The effective electric fields in different grain families, when we consider the ferroelectric material like BiFeO_{3} exposed to an external electric field, is analogue to field redistribution in leaky capacitors with different capacitance (C_{i}) and resistivity (R_{i}) connected in series. The applied external voltage is U_{app} and the field is E_{app}. U_{i} and E_{i} are the voltage and effective field on each capacitor. One further takes into account the fraction of different types of capacitance, v_{i }(corresponding to the fraction volume of each grain family), which is proportional to their thickness l_{i} if the effective area of all capacitors is the same. For series connection, the charge density (D_{i}) on each capacitor is equal, and the external voltage is the sum of the voltages on all capacitors. One obtains the following equations:
where κ_{i} is dielectric permittivity of the capacitors. The electric fields on individual capacitors are thus:
Considering alternating external electric field with angular frequency ω, and adding complex permittivity of the weakly conducting material as:
one gets the complex form for the effective field in each grain (capacitor 1 corresponds to {100}_{pc} grain family, and capacitor 2 corresponds to {111}_{pc} grain family). Finally, the redistributed field in different grain families is obtained as:
The subscript represents grain orientation with respect to the external field vector, \(\tau = \frac{{v_{100}\kappa _{111}^\prime + v_{111}\kappa _{100}^\prime }}{{v_{100}\sigma _{111} + v_{111}\sigma _{100}}}\) is the relaxation time of the twograin system, and \(E_{hkl}^\prime\) and \(E_{hkl}^{\prime \prime }\) are the real and imaginary components of the effective electric fields, respectively.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors on request.
References
 1.
Salje, E. K. H. Multiferroic domain boundaries as active memory devices: trajectories towards domain boundary engineering. ChemPhysChem 11, 940–950 (2010).
 2.
Seidel, J. et al. Conduction at domain walls in oxide multiferroics. Nat. Mater. 8, 229–234 (2009).
 3.
Catalan, G., Seidel, J., Ramesh, R. & Scott, J. F. Domain wall nanoelectronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 119–156 (2012).
 4.
Sharma, P. et al. Nonvolatile ferroelectric domain wall memory. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700512 (2017).
 5.
Whyte, J. R. & Gregg, J. M. A diode for ferroelectric domainwall motion. Nat. Commun. 6, 7361 (2015).
 6.
Jiang, J. et al. Temporary formation of highly conducting domain walls for nondestructive readout of ferroelectric domainwall resistance switching memories. Nat. Mater. 17, 49–56 (2018).
 7.
Rojac, T., Ursic, H., Bencan, A., Malic, B. & Damjanovic, D. Mobile domain walls as a bridge between nanoscale conductivity and macroscopic electromechanical response. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 2099–2108 (2015).
 8.
Damjanovic, D. Logarithmic frequency dependence of the piezoelectric effect due to pinning of ferroelectricferroelastic domain walls. Phys. Rev. B 55, R649–R652 (1997).
 9.
Furukawa, T., Aiba, J. & Fukada, E. Piezoelectric relaxation in polyvinylidene fluoride. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 3615–3621 (1978).
 10.
Ueda, H., Fukada, E. & Karasz, F. E. Piezoelectricity in threephase systems: effect of the boundary phase. J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2672–2677 (1986).
 11.
Hamano, K. & Yamaguchi, T. Piezoelectric relaxation in ferroelectrics and polymers. Ferroelectrics 42, 23–33 (1982).
 12.
Damjanovic, D., Maeder, M. D., Martin, P. D., Voisard, C. & Setter, N. Maxwell–Wagner piezoelectric relaxation in ferroelectric heterostructures. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 5708–5712 (2001).
 13.
Hippel, A. R. V. Dielectrics and Waves. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1954).
 14.
Daymond, M. The determination of a continuum mechanics equivalent elastic strain from the analysis of multiple diffraction peaks. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 4263–4272 (2004).
 15.
Jones, J. L., Slamovich, E. B. & Bowman, K. J. Domain texture distributions in tetragonal lead zirconate titanate by xray and neutron diffraction. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 034113 (2005).
 16.
Zeches, R. et al. A straindriven morphotropic phase boundary in BiFeO_{3}. Science 326, 977–980 (2009).
 17.
Khansur, N. H. et al. Electricfieldinduced domain switching and domain texture relaxations in bulk bismuth ferrite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98, 3884–3890 (2015).
 18.
Hall, D. A., Steuwer, A., Cherdhirunkorn, B., Mori, T. & Withers, P. J. A high energy synchrotron xray study of crystallographic texture and lattice strain in soft lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 4245–4252 (2004).
 19.
Pramanick, A., Damjanovic, D., Daniels, J. E., Nino, J. C. & Jones, J. L. Origins of electromechanical coupling in polycrystalline ferroelectrics during subcoercive electrical loading. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 293–309 (2011).
 20.
Khatua, D. K., Lalitha, K. V., Fancher, C. M., Jones, J. L. & Ranjan, R. Coupled domain wall motion, lattice strain and phase transformation in morphotropic phase boundary composition of PbTiO_{3}–BiScO_{3} piezoelectric ceramic. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 154104 (2016).
 21.
Seshadri, S. B., Prewitt, A. D., Studer, A. J., Damjanovic, D. & Jones, J. L. An in situ diffraction study of domain wall motion contributions to the frequency dispersion of the piezoelectric coefficient in lead zirconate titanate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 042911 (2013).
 22.
Jones, J. L. et al. Domain wall and interphase boundary motion in a twophase morphotropic phase boundary ferroelectric: frequency dispersion and contribution to piezoelectric and dielectric properties. Phys. Rev. B 86, 024104 (2012).
 23.
Hall, D. A., Steuwer, A., Cherdhirunkorn, B., Mori, T. & Withers, P. J. Analysis of elastic strain and crystallographic texture in poled rhombohedral PZT ceramics. Acta Mater. 54, 3075–3083 (2006).
 24.
Rojac, T., Bencan, A., Drazic, G., Kosec, M. & Damjanovic, D. Piezoelectric nonlinearity and frequency dispersion of the direct piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3} ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 064114 (2012).
 25.
Arlt, G. Piezoelectric relaxation. Ferroelectrics 40, 149–157 (1982).
 26.
Holland, R. Representation of dielectric, elastic, and piezoelectric losses by complex coefficients. IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. SU14, 18–20 (1967).
 27.
Nowick, A. S. & Heller, W. R. Dielectric and anelastic relaxation of crystals containing point defects. Adv. Phys. 14, 101–166 (2006).
 28.
Liu, J. et al. Large dielectric constant and Maxwell–Wagner relaxation in Bi_{2∕3}Cu_{3}Ti_{4}O_{12}. Phys. Rev. B 70, 144106 (2004).
 29.
Turik, A. V. & Radchenko, G. S. Maxwell–Wagner relaxation in piezoactive media. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, 1188–1192 (2002).
 30.
Rojac, T. et al. Piezoelectric response of BiFeO_{3} ceramics at elevated temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 042904 (2016).
 31.
Rojac, T. et al. Domainwall conduction in ferroelectric BiFeO_{3} controlled by accumulation of charged defects. Nat. Mater. 16, 322–327 (2017).
 32.
Catalan, G. & Scott, J. F. Physics and applications of bismuth ferrite. Adv. Mater. 21, 2463–2485 (2009).
 33.
Jaffe, B, Cook, W. R. Jr. & Jaffe, H. Piezoelectric Ceramics. (Academic: London and New York, 1971.
 34.
Damjanovic, D. Stress and frequency dependence of the direct piezoelectric effect in ferroelectric ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1788–1797 (1997).
 35.
Seidel, J. et al. Domain wall conductivity in Ladoped BiFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 197603 (2010).
 36.
Sluka, T., Tagantsev, A. K., Bednyakov, P. & Setter, N. Freeelectron gas at charged domain walls in insulating BaTiO_{3}. Nat. Commun. 4, 1808 (2013).
 37.
Lindgren, G. & Canalias, C. Domain wall conductivity in KTiOPO_{4} crystals. APL Mater. 5, 076108 (2017).
 38.
Du, Y. et al. Domain wall conductivity in oxygen deficient multiferroic YMnO_{3} single crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 252107 (2011).
 39.
Campbell, M. P. et al. Hall effect in charged conducting ferroelectric domain walls. Nat. Commun. 7, 13764 (2016).
 40.
Meier, D. et al. Anisotropic conductance at improper ferroelectric domain walls. Nat. Mater. 11, 284–288 (2012).
 41.
Schröder, M. et al. Conducting domain walls in lithium niobate single crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 3936–3944 (2012).
 42.
Guyonnet, J., Gaponenko, I., Gariglio, S. & Paruch, P. Conduction at domain walls in insulating Pb(Zr_{0.2}Ti_{0.8})O_{3} thin films. Adv. Mater. 23, 5377–5382 (2011).
 43.
Daniels, J., Pramanick, A. & Jones, J. Timeresolved characterization of ferroelectrics using highenergy xray diffraction. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56, 1539–1545 (2009).
 44.
Hammersley, A. P., Svensson, S. O., Hanfland, M., Fitch, A. N. & Hausermann, D. Two dimensional detector software: from real detector to idealised image of twotheta scan. High. Press. Res. 14, 235–248 (1996).
 45.
Metzler, R. & Klafter, J. From stretched exponential to inverse powerlaw: fractional dynamics, Cole–Cole relaxation processes, and beyond. J. NonCryst. Solids 305, 81–87 (2002).
 46.
Davis, M., Budimir, M., Damjanovic, D. & Setter, N. Rotator and extender ferroelectrics: Importance of the shear coefficient to the piezoelectric properties of domainengineered crystals and ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 054112 (2007).
 47.
Rojac, T. et al. BiFeO_{3} ceramics: processing, electrical, and electromechanical properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 1993–2011 (2014).
 48.
Lu, J. et al. On the room temperature multiferroic BiFeO_{3}: magnetic, dielectric and thermal properties. Eur. Phys. J. B 75, 451–460 (2010).
 49.
Markiewicz, E., Hilczer, B., Baszyk, M., Pietraszko, A. & Talik, E. Dielectric properties of BiFeO_{3} ceramics obtained from mechanochemically synthesized nanopowders. J. Electroceram. 27, 154–161 (2011).
Acknowledgements
J.D. acknowledges financial support from Australian Research Council Discovery projects DP120103968 and DP130100415. The European Synchrotron Radiation Facility is acknowledged for the provision of experimental beamtime. T.R. would like to acknowledge the Slovenian Research Agency for financial support through the research program P20105. Zhen Zhou and Hana Ursic are acknowledged for PFM and conductive AFM data, while Jana Cilensek is acknowledged for AFM sample preparation.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
L.L. and T.R. synthesized the polycrystalline BiFeO_{3}. L.L., J.D. and M.D.M. performed the diffraction experiments. L.L. conducted the data analysis with assistance from J.D., L.L., J.D., D.D. and T.R. all contributed to the interpretation of the data. L.L. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to John Daniels.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.D. is director of Critus Pty. Ltd. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Rojac, T., Damjanovic, D. et al. Frequencydependent decoupling of domainwall motion and lattice strain in bismuth ferrite. Nat Commun 9, 4928 (2018) doi:10.1038/s4146701807363y
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Further reading

3D Axisymmetric Exact Solutions of the Piezocoating Sensors for Coating/substrate System under Charged Conical Contact
International Journal of Solids and Structures (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.