Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Organic field-effect optical waveguides

An Author Correction to this article was published on 18 December 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Integrating electronics and photonics is critically important for the realization of high-density and high-speed optoelectronic circuits. However, it remains challenging to achieve this target due to the difficulty of merging many different areas of science and technology. Here, we show an organic integrated optoelectronic device, namely, organic field-effect optical waveguide, integrating field-effect transistor and optical waveguide together. In such device, the propagation of optical waveguide in the active organic semiconductor can be tuned by the third terminal—the gate electrode of transistor, giving a controllable modulation depth as high as 70% and 50% in parallel and perpendicular directions of charge transport versus optical waveguide, respectively. Also, the optical waveguide with different directions can turn the field-effect of the device with the photodependence ratio up to 14800. The successful integration of active field-effect transistor with semiconductor waveguide modulator expands opportunities for creating scalable integration of electronics and photonics in a chip.

Introduction

Optoelectronic integration has become indispensable as the essential requirements of modern life for high-density connection of electronic and photonic devices.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 For example, the discovery of the field-effect transistor,2 wherein the field effect is created and influenced by the gate voltage, controlling the “conducting channel” and current of the transistor, founded today’s computer science, microelectronics, and information technologies. However, the integration of photonic devices as well as electronic and photonic elements is full of challenges since the weak interaction between photons.3,11,12,13 For organic optoelectronic devices, fortunately, Hide et al.4 suggested an application of semiconducting polymers as solid-state laser materials. Sirringhaus et al.14 invented an all-polymer semiconductor integrated device with a high-mobility conjugated polymer field-effect transistor driving a polymer light-emitting diode of similar size. Ho et al.15 demonstrated composites of nanoparticles and conjugated polymers that exhibit composition-tunable optical constants for use in semiconducting photonic structures. Hepp et al.16 reported a light-emitting field-effect transistor based on a tetracene thin film, which integrated a light-emitting diode and field-effect transistors into individual devices. These achievements have greatly contributed to the development of organic optoelectronics;17,18,19 however, optoelectronic integration of electronics and photonics in a chip remains challenging in this field due to the difficulty of merging many different areas of science and technology.

Photons can be imagined as a self-propagating transverse oscillating wave of electric and magnetic fields according to Maxwell’s equations (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Hence, during the propagation of photons in optical waveguides, it has the potential to be tuned by the external electric field.10,20,21,22,23,24,25 It is also well-acknowledged that a stationary charge produces an electric field, a charge moving at constant speed produces electric and magnetic fields, and a charge that is accelerated will produce variable electric and magnetic fields. Hence, taking a field-effect transistor into consideration, charges transport in its conducting channel from source to drain electrodes, and such charge transport process will be potentially influenced by the incident optical waves according to electromagnetic wave theory,20 which on the other hand will also modulate propagation of an optical signal in the active medium (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Moreover, as one of the critical devices of electronic logic, the three-terminal transistors that can be controlled by the gate voltage possess signal amplification and switching characteristics, which are seen as the promising device architecture toward high-density and high-speed on-chip integrated optoelectronic circuits. Several types of conceptual optical transistors have been proposed for photonic circuits, namely, quantum well optoelectronic switching devices, field-effect plasmonic modulator, etc.26,27,28 But integration of the active electronic transistors with semiconductor waveguide modulators has rarely been exploited for the realization of direct electro-optic modulators with simultaneously controlling both the light and charge that carries propagation.29,30

Herein, we show an organic optoelectronic integrated device, namely, an organic field-effect optical waveguide (OFEW) where the propagating photons can be tuned by the electric current produced in the organic field-effect transistor (OFET), and vice versa. Such extraordinarily convenient voltage control of waveguide behavior can be elucidated by the change and mismatch of energy alignment between molecules due to the formation of charged molecules when electric current flows in device operation. Experimental results demonstrate that the modulation depth for the propagation of an optical waveguide can reach as high as 70% and 50% when photon transport is parallel and perpendicular to the conducting channel, respectively. While under the laser light illumination (with powers of 500 nW to 5 μW), the modulated highest photodependence ratio of such a field-effect transistor can be up to 14800. The successful demonstration of such OFEW opens an avenue and concept to construct active high-density and high-speed optoelectronic integrated circuits on a chip for optical information and communication applications.

Results

Preparation and characterization of CHICZ single crystals

Compared with inorganic semiconductors, organic semiconductors, as a new generation of semiconducting materials, take the advantages,12,17,18,19,31 including tailoring functions by molecular design, ideal flexibility, solution processibility, low in cost, as well as possessing the capacity for creating highly complex integrated optoelectronic systems on planar substrates. To demonstrate the concept of our OFEWs, here, an organic semiconductor, 2,8-dichloro-5,11-dihexyl-indolo(3,2-b)carbazole (CHICZ, Fig. 1a), is used as a model system that can be extended to more complicated fully conjugated systems. The choice of CHICZ is because that it is a pentacene analog with efficient charge transport property. But different from pentacene without fluorescence, CHICZ simultaneously shows strong solid-state fluorescence (Supplementary Fig. 2) as well as excellent stability due to a large energy gap of 2.79 eV.32

Fig. 1
figure1

Characterizations of CHICZ single crystals. a Molecular structure of CHICZ. b SEM image of CHICZ crystal ribbons. Scale bar: 20 μm. c and d Molecular packing in CHICZ single crystal seen from different directions. e TEM image and its corresponding SAED pattern of an individual CHICZ single crystal in which CHICZ molecules are packing along the b axis with π−π stacking. Scale bar: 1 μm. f and g Fluorescence microcopy images of CHICZ ribbons showing less loss coefficients in long distance and good flexibility. Scale bar: 50 μm

As promising building blocks for high-performance optoelectronic devices, organic micro- and nanocrystals play key roles on efficient charge transport and stable polaritons with long-range propagation due to their high crystallinity, no grain boundary, and minimum defects.19,33,34 To carry out our investigation, CHICZ single crystals are first grown by physical vapor transfer (PVT) system35 with argon (Ar) carrier gas by carefully controlling the material evaporation condition (Supplementary Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 1b, regular ribbon-like crystals can be obtained, with a length of tens to hundred micrometers and width of several to tens of micrometers (e.g., a ribbon crystal with a length of over 300 μm and a large two-dimensional size within a thin-film crystal with a width of over 200 μm, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4). Atomic force microscope (AFM) images demonstrate that these crystals normally have regular rectangular sections with a height of hundreds of nanometers (Supplementary Figs. 56). The surface of the crystals is very flat and atomically smooth, further indicating the high quality of obtained CHICZ crystals, which is crucial for reducing the light-scattering loss and obtaining efficient light waveguide propagation in crystals.36,37

Single-crystal data of CHICZ demonstrate that it belongs to a P21/n monoclinic space group with unit cell parameters of a = 16.759(5) Å, b = 4.4914(14) Å, c = 18.515(7) Å, and β = 114.283(5)o.32 In crystals, CHICZ molecules adopt a face-to-face slipped pi-stacking motif with an intermolecular distance of 3.45 Å for π-π stacking along the b axis (Fig. 1c, d). The pitch and roll angles are 10.4o and 26.0o, respectively, suggesting efficient orbital overlap between the adjacent molecules and effective charge transport along this direction. X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) of CHICZ single crystals could be indexed according to its single-crystal data. Obviously, only the multistage (h0l) (h = –l) diffraction patterns are observed (Supplementary Fig. 7), indicating the preferable molecular orientation of CHICZ crystals with (h0l) crystalline planes parallel to the substrate. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and its corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns are shown in Fig. 1e. The same pattern is observed at different parts along the ribbon, indicating that the whole ribbon is a single crystal. The SAED pattern could be indexed with its single crystal lattice constants, and it confirms that the crystal grows along the [010] direction, i.e., the π–π stacking direction of CHICZ molecules. Such direction of this molecular packing is beneficial for charge transport.

Interestingly, CHICZ crystals also show a strong blue emission. Bright light spots are observed at the ends and edges of crystals (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 5c–i), indicating that they are excellent candidates as optical waveguides. More attractively, ribbons with a length of over 300 μm (Fig. 1g) not only show a strong blue emission and ideal waveguide features, but also excellent flexibility, indicating the potential application of the crystals in flexible optoelectronic devices. In order to accurately evaluate the propagation loss property of our CHICZ crystals, measurements based on the spatially resolved photoluminescence (PL) spectra of an individual ribbon are performed with a 408-nm focused laser beam (which is accurately shifting the excitation laser spots at one end and collecting the PL signal from another end, Supplementary Fig. 8). Two directions, parallel and perpendicular to the crystal long axis, are carried out in our experiment. According to equation (1), optical loss coefficient (α) of guided light in the fundamental modes is obtained38

$$a = - 10 \times \log \left( {I_{\mathrm{out}}/I_{\mathrm{in}}} \right) \times {{L}}^{ - 1}$$
(1)

where Iin and Iout are the intensities of incident and out-coupled lights, and L is the propagation distance. The α values for CHICZ crystals at 455 nm along and perpendicular to the ribbon are determined to be 10 and 20 dB mm−1, respectively. These values are quite low among organic semiconductors,39,40 confirming the excellent optical waveguide features of CHICZ crystals.

To investigate the electronic performance of the obtained CHICZ ribbon crystals, top-contact, bottom-gate OFETs of an individual CHICZ crystal are fabricated based on octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS)-modified Si/SiO2 (300 nm) substrates using an isolated technique41 (Supplementary Fig. 9). The devices exhibit typical OFET properties (Supplementary Fig. 10), and the field-effect mobility and the on/off ratio are calculated to be 0.52 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 2×106, respectively. Moreover, the corresponding threshold voltage of the device is around zero voltage. These excellent field-effect properties together with the excellent optical waveguide properties in CHICZ crystals (Fig. 1) indicate their potential application in our proposed integrated optoelectronic device, OFEWs.

Device fabrication and optoelectronic modulation of OFEWs

To construct a stable OFEW device for the following measurement, several points should be considered in the experiment. First, transparent substrates are necessary because the laser illumination and waveguide intensity measurement are from two sides of the device. So here, indium tin oxide (ITO) and polyimide (PI) are selected instead of the former Si and SiO2 in OFETs as the gate electrode and insulator layer. Second, to ensure the easy detection of waveguide performance, the ends of CHICZ ribbon crystals should not be covered completely by the electrodes in the device. The specific device fabrication of CHICZ-based OFEW is depicted in Figs. 2a, b. First, Au thin film is pre-deposited on a Si wafer by thermal evaporation. Then, a small piece of Au film, approximately 30 μm × 150 μm, is cut and peeled off from the Si substrate by the tip of the mechanical probe and transferred onto the CHICZ ribbon as a mask for source or drain electrodes deposition (Fig. 2a). After that, the mask gold strip is peeled off and the final device of the individual CHICZ ribbon crystal is obtained, as shown in Fig. 2b (a prototype device is also shown in Supplementary Fig. 11). The incident laser beam is guided into a CHICZ crystal through two ways, i.e., parallel and perpendicular to the conducting channel of the transistors (Fig. 2c–f), to investigate the effect of electro–photo coupling (the measurement system, including OFETs, optical waveguides and laser systems, etc., is shown in Supplementary Fig. 12).

Fig. 2
figure2

Schematic and actual device of CHICZ-based OFEWs. a Gold stripes prepared for source and drain electrodes by “gold stripes stick technique”. b Schematic of an OFEW constructed based on an individual CHICZ crystal ribbon with gold stripes as source and drain electrodes. Two models for optical waveguide direction, along the conducting channel (model I), and perpendicular to the conducting channel (model II). c Device working in model I, current transport is parallel with the optical waveguide direction. Scale bar: 20 μm. d Device working in model II, current transport is perpendicular to the laser, where a large thin crystal is selected for easy experimental operation. Scale bar: 20 μm. e and f Laser in and out of the devices working in modes I and II, respectively, demonstrating a typical optical waveguide feature in the active device

The modulation of field effect on optical waveguides is shown in Fig. 3. At the parallel mode I, that is, the incident laser is parallel to the conducting channel of the transistor (Figs. 2c, e), the output intensities of the waveguide exhibit a strong dependence on the gate bias. Here, modulation-degree M is used to characterize the field effect on waveguides. It is calculated by the equation M = (1–(Ion/Ioff))×100%, where Ion and Ioff are the intensities with and without voltage bias. At Vds = –30 V, M is over 25% during Vg shifting from 0 to −30 V) (Fig. 3a), confirming the obvious field effect on a waveguide in CHICZ crystals. More interestingly, at a constant electric field, e.g., Vg = –30 V, the field effect on the waveguide is more significant, as shown in Fig. 3b, and the M value is over 75% during Vds shifting from 0 to −30 V (Fig. 3c), indicating that the interaction between photons and charges is more notable during the current increase. A similar phenomenon is also observed in a perpendicular mode II, but the incident laser is perpendicular to the conducting channel of the transistor (Figs. 2d, f). The dependence of PL intensity on source–drain voltage is more significant than that on gate voltage, but the modulation degree M is over 50% (Fig. 3d). The results clearly demonstrate that our designed OFEW device is approachable by using CHICZ single crystal and the field effect on a waveguide is more significant when the channel current is increasing. In comparison, it is found that without the gate voltage applied and under the same source–drain voltage of –30 V, the maximum M value obtained in the experiment is only 10% (Supplementary Fig. 13), suggesting the importance of a larger lateral electric field induced by the field effect on the resulting increased M values, that is, a signal amplification effect. It should also be noted that in our experiments, the intensity modulation is accomplished without changing the dominant peak position at λ = 455 and 480 nm, and the source/drain voltage is unloaded until the PL intensity is stable to avoid optical cleaning for organic materials (Supplementary Fig. 14).

Fig. 3
figure3

Modulation features of CHICZ-based OFEWs. ad Field-effect modulation on an optical waveguide of CHICZ ribbons. ac Working in mode I. a PL intensity dependence on gate voltage. b PL intensity dependence on source–drain voltage. c Modulation percentage of the waveguide intensity tuned by different source–drain voltages. d PL intensity dependence on source–drain voltage working in mode II. e and f Optical waveguide modulation on field-effect performance. Transfer characteristic dependence on a different laser illumination working in e, mode I and f, mode II, respectively

The modulation of an optical waveguide on transistor performance is also examined. Under different laser intensities, the corresponding transfer characteristics are collected with a constant Vds = –30 V, and Vgs scanning from 20 to −30 V. The results are shown in Figs. 3e and f. Ids increases with laser intensity demonstrating a nice photodependence, and the devices work like phototransistors.42 Here, a photodependence ratio, which is defined as the (Ilaser–Idark)/Idark (where Ilaser and Idark is the Ids current under laser illumination and without laser illumination at the same Vgs and Vds), is used to characterize the effect of laser illumination on field-effect performance. In parallel mode I, with the waveguide propagation direction along the electric current, the photodependence ratio is significantly increased, up to 14800 under 5 μW laser illumination(Fig. 3e). However, in perpendicular mode II, i.e., with the waveguide propagation direction perpendicular to the conducting channel, a very low photodependence ratio (only ~100) is obtained under the same (5 μW) laser illumination (Fig. 3f).

Theoretical mechanism simulation of OFEWs

The underlying mechanism of such extraordinarily convenient voltage control of waveguide behavior can be elucidated in Fig. 4. On one hand, for excitons (electron/hole pairs) generated by light illumination in CHICZ without an external electric field, the resonant-energy transferring process dominates the migration of excitons. As shown in Fig. 4a, the energy schemes based on the molecular orbitals show clearly that the CHICZ molecules (M1, the x, and the n) meet the prerequisite of an identical energy gap for efficient exciton transfer. On the other hand, for the system under an external (source–drain) voltage modulation without photoexcitation (Fig. 4b), the charge hop process becomes dominant. When a hole ( + h) is hopping through M1 to Mn in our system, there are chances that the hole might be trapped in a molecule Mx, which instantly changes the energy scheme/molecular orbitals. One can look into the timescale for the above two processes in Fig. 4c. Normally, the transferring of an exciton takes about 1 ns. The charge hopping rate depends on the electric current, so we can estimate a time interval of 160/I ps for a current intensity of I through the organic polymer system, which is always far shorter than the exciton transferring time. Therefore, for our system under both photoexcitation and external voltage in Fig. 4d, the transferring of photogenerated excitons could encounter a large number of hopping charges as long as the hopping current l is strong enough. In this case, a hole ( + h) is trapped by a molecule Mx, whose energy scheme will be greatly changed and will not match with other molecules any more. Under such situation, the resonant-energy transferring process and the consequent waveguide will be heavily suppressed by the hole trapping, through which we could achieve efficient voltage control of a waveguide. Such working process is further confirmed by the deep theoretical calculations, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 15. The results clearly demonstrate that no matter for the single molecule and dimers, if a charge (positive or negative) is trapped by molecules when electric currents are driven by gate or source–drain voltage, the frontier orbitals would be effectively up- or downshifted, which reduces the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) gap significantly (i.e., 1.1–1.7 eV and 3.0–3.1 eV reduced for a single molecule and dimers, respectively). These break the energy match between adjacent molecules and thereby shut down the channel for resonant-energy transferring, leading to the suppression on the output optical waveguide properties.

Fig. 4
figure4

The underlying mechanism of voltage control of waveguide behavior. a The exciton transferring in the molecular orbital energy scheme of an aggregated polymer system (M1, …, Mx, …, Mn) under photo excitation and no external voltage. b The (hole) charge hopping process driven by external voltage in the polymer without photoexcitation. c The time scale of normal exciton transfer and charge hop processes. d The resonant-energy transferring of photo generated excitons is suppressed by the mismatch of energy gap in Mx induced by hole trapping due to external voltage control

Discussion

In conclusion, an innovation of concept for organic integrated optoelectronic devices, organic optoelectronic integrated devices, OFEWs, is proposed and approached by using CHICZ single crystals. The devices demonstrate a successful control of photon propagation by an electric field. When the guide wave is parallel to the conducting channel of the transistor, waveguide intensity modulation is up to 70%, when the guide wave is perpendicular to the conducting channel of the transistor, the modulation is also up to 50%. The field-effect performances of OFEWs are also tunable by optical waveguides with an anisotropic property. With the propagation direction of the optical waveguide along the conducting channel, the photodependence ratio is up to 14800 under 5 µW of laser illumination, while the photodependence ratio is only about 100 with a waveguide perpendicular to the conducting channel under the same laser illumination. Considering the quanta features of photons and electrons, probably, our OFEW is a quantum device, wherein the photon propagation is closely related with the behavior of charges.

Methods

Materials

CHICZ is synthesized in our laboratory.32 Polyimide (PI) is synthesized, as described elsewhere,43 and used as an insulator material.

Device fabrication

Two kinds of substrates, ITO/PI and Si/SiO2, are used. ITO glasses are cut into 2-cm × 2-cm pieces, then cleaned by pure water, pure acetone, and finally blew by pure nitrogen gas. After that, a 12% solid content precursor polyamic acid (PAA) solution in N,N-dimethyl-acetamide is spin-coated on ITO at a speed of 2000 rpm for 30 s, then heated at 140 oC for 1 h to remove the solvent, and subsequently heated to 300 oC to produce a PI thin film, which is used as an insulator layer. CHICZ single crystals are grown by the PVT method and are transferred onto PI/ITO substrates as a semiconducting and waveguide material. In total, 40–50-nm-thick gold source and drain electrodes are deposited on top of CHICZ single crystals through thermal evaporation with a shadow mask of gold layer. In order to observe the fluorescence signal modulation on the end of a CHICZ single crystal, one terminal of a single crystal should not be covered by the gold electrode. In total, 300-nm SiO2 on n++-doped Si wafer is used as a substrate. Before device fabrication, substrates are cleaned with pure water, pure acetone, piranha solution (H2SO4:H2O2 = 7:3), pure water, pure ethanol, and blew by pure nitrogen gas, which are then modified with a self-assembled monolayer of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS). The device fabrication is the same as that on the PI/ITO substrate.

Characterizations of CHICZ single crystals

The morphology and crystallinity of the CHICZ single crystals are characterized by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800), Olympus BX51, AFM (Digital Instrument, Nanoscopy IIIa), XRD (Rigaku D/max 2500 with Cu K source Å), and TEM (JEOL 1011 operated at 100 kV), respectively. Bright-field optical images and PL images are taken from an inverted fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS FV1000-IX81), by exciting the samples with the UV band (330–380 nm) of a mercury lamp.

Characterizations of OFETs and OFEWs

All OFET characteristics are measured using a Keithley 4200-SCS System under an ambient environment at room temperature. The CHICZ single-crystal OFEW devices are locally excited with a focused 408-nm Ar ion laser (spot size ~2 μm). The fluorescence spectra are measured with fluorescent spectroscopy liquid-nitrogen cooled CCD (SPEC-10–400B/LbN, Roper Scientific). Fluorescence images are recorded using an Olympus research inverted system microscope (FV1000-IX81, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a charge-coupled device (CCD, Olympus DP71, Tokyo, Japan) camera.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 18 December 2018

    The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 3, in which the x-axes in Fig. 3e and Fig. 3f were incorrectly labelled ‘Vds’ rather than the correct ‘Vgs’. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

References

  1. 1.

    Wada, O. Optoelectronic integration: physics, technology and applications. South Afr. J. Occup. Ther. 43, 1754–1770 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sedra, A. S. & Smith, K. C. Microelectronic Circuits. 5th edn, (Oxford, New York, 2004).

  3. 3.

    Ramo, S., Whinnery, J. & Van Duzer, T. Fields and waves in communications electronics. 2nd edn, (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hide, F. et al. Semiconducting polymers: a new class of solid-state laser. Mater. Sci. 273, 1833–1836 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Duan, X., Huang, Y., Agarwal, R. & Lieber, C. M. Single-nanowire electrically driven lasers. Nature 421, 241–245 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Xu, Q., Schmidt, B., Pradhan, S. & Lipson, M. Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator. Nature 435, 325–327 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    High, A. A., Novitskaya, E. E., Butov, L. V., Hanson, M. & Gossard, A. C. Control of exciton fluxes in an excitonic integrated circuit. Science 321, 229–231 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Krasavin, A. V. & Zayats, A. V. Photonic signal processing on electronic scales: electro-optical field-effect nanoplasmonic modulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 053901 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davoyan, A. & Engheta, N. Electrically controlled one-way photon flow in plasmonic nanostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 5250 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cui, Q. et al. Asymmetric photon transport in organic semiconductor nanowires through electrically controlled exciton diffusion. Sci. Adv. 4, eaap9861 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Davanco, M. et al. Heterogeneous integration for on-chip quantum photonic circuits with single quantum dot devices. Nat. Commun. 8, 889 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang, W., Yao, J. & Zhao, Y. Organic micro/nanoscale lasers. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1691–1700 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yang, K. Y. et al. Bridging ultrahigh-Q devices and photonic circuits. Nat. Photonics 12, 297–302 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sirringhaus, H., Tessler, N. & Friend, R. H. Integrated optoelectronic devices based on conjugated polymers. Science 280, 1741–1744 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ho, P. K. H., Thomas, D. S., Friend, R. H. & Tessler, N. All-polymer optoelectronic devices. Science 285, 233–236 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hepp, A. et al. Light-emitting field-effect transistor based on a tetracene thin film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 157406 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Forrest, S. R. & Thompson, M. E. Introduction: organic electronics and optoelectronics. Chem. Rev. 107, 923–925 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hu, W. Organic Optoelectronics. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang, X., Dong, H. & Hu, W. Organic semiconductor single crystals for electronics and photonics. Adv. Mater. 30, 1801048 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Stratton, J. A. Electromagnetic Theory (Wiley-IEEE Press, New York, 2007).

  21. 21.

    Melikyan, A., Alloatti, L. & Muslija, A. High-speed plasmonic phase modulators. Nat. Photonics 8, 229–233 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Reed, G. T., Mashanovich, G., Gardes, F. Y. & Thomson, D. J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photonics 4, 518–526 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jacobsen, R. S. et al. Strained silicon as a new electro-optic material. Nature 441, 199–202 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yan, R., Gargas, D. & Yang, P. Nanowire photonics. Nat. Photonics 3, 569–576 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Greytak, A. B., Barrelet, C. J., Li, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Semiconductor nanowire laser and nanowire waveguide electro-optic modulators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 151103 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kastalsky, A., Abeles, J. H. & Leheny, R. F. Novel optoelectronic single quantum well devices based on electron bleaching of exciton absorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 708–710 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dionne, J. A., Diest, K., Sweatlock, L. A. & Atwater, H. A. PlasMOStor: a metal-oxide-Si field effect plasmonic modulator. Nano. Lett. 9, 897–902 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    High, A. A., Novitskaya, E. E., Butov, L. V., Hanson, M. & Gossard, A. C. Control of exciton fluxes in an excitonic integrated circuit. Science 321, 229–231 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Abeles, J. H., Chat, W. K., Shokoohi, F. K., Bhat, R. & Koza, M. A. Integration of GaAs MESFET drivers with GaAs directional-coupler electro-optic modulators. Electron. Lett. 23, 1037–1038 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Abeles, J. H., Chan, W. K., Colas, E. & Kastalsky, A. Junction field‐effect transistor single quantum well optical waveguide modulator employing the two‐dimensional Moss–Burstein effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2177–2179 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, C., Dong, H., Hu, W., Liu, Y. & Zhu, D. Semiconducting π-conjugated systems in field-effect transistors: a material odyssey of organic electronics. Chem. Rev. 112, 2208–2267 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhao, G. et al. Substitution effect on molecular packing and transistor performance of indolo[3,2-b]carbazole derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 4409–4417 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Li, R., Hu, W., Liu, Y. & Zhu, D. Micro- and nanocrystals of organic semiconductors. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 529–540 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lidzey, D. G. et al. Strong exciton–photon coupling in an organic semiconductor microcavity. Nature 395, 53–55 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Laudise, R. A., Kloc, Ch, Simpkins, P. G. & Siegrist, T. Physical vapor growth of organic semiconductors. J. Cryst. Growth 187, 449–454 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Snyder, A. W. & Love, J. D. Optical Waveguide Theory. (Chapman and Hall, London, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ye, J. et al. Optical wavelength filters based on photonic confinement in semiconductor nanowire homojunctions. Adv. Mater. 26, 620–624 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Liao, Q., Fu, H., Wang, C. & Yao, J. Cooperative assembly of binary molecular components into tubular structures for multiple photonic applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4942–4946 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang, C., Yan, Y., Zhao, Y. & Yao, J. From molecular design and materials construction to organic nanophotonic devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3448–3458 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yao, W. et al. Controlling the structures and photonic properties of organic nanomaterials by molecular design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 8713–8717 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tang, Q. et al. Micrometer- and nanometer-sized organic single-crystalline transistors. Adv. Mater. 20, 2947–2951 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tang, Q. et al. Photoswitches and phototransistors from organic single-crystalline sub-micro/nanometer ribbons. Adv. Mater. 19, 2624–2628 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ji, D. et al. Large scale, flexible organic transistor arrays and circuits based on polyimide materials. Org. Electron. 14, 2528–2533 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciated Dr. Guangjun Tian (University of 212 Science and Technology of China) for theoretical discussion and MS. Zhengsheng Qin (Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for figure revision and featured image design. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grants 2017YFA0204503 and 2016YFB0401100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51725304, 51633006, 51733004, 21875259 and 91433115), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB12030300), and the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.H. and H.D. conceived the research and designed the experiments. G.Z. and H.D. fabricated all the devices and measured OFET properties. Q.L. and H.F. measured the waveguide features of individual CHICZ crystal. G.Z., Q.L. H.D. and H.F. measured OFEW properties. J.J. and Y.L. carried out the theoretical calculations. H.D. and W.H. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huanli Dong or Wenping Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, G., Dong, H., Liao, Q. et al. Organic field-effect optical waveguides. Nat Commun 9, 4790 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07269-9

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing