Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

All-inorganic cesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells with stabilized efficiency beyond 15%

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 19 November 2018

This article has been updated


As the black cesium lead iodide (CsPbI3) tends to transit into a yellow δ-phase at ambient, it is imperative to develop a stabilized black phase for photovoltaic applications. Herein, we report a distorted black CsPbI3 film by exploiting the synergistic effect of hydroiodic acid (HI) and phenylethylammonium iodide (PEAI) additives. It is found that the HI induces formation of hydrogen lead iodide (HPbI3+x), an intermediate to the distorted black phase with appropriate band gap of 1.69 eV; while PEAI provides nucleation for optimized crystallization. More importantly, it stabilizes the distorted black phase by hindering phase transition via its steric effects. Upon optimization, we have attained solar cell efficiency as high as 15.07%. Specifically, the bare cell without any encapsulation shows negligible efficiency loss after 300 h of light soaking. The device keeps 92% of its initial cell efficiency after being stored for 2 months under ambient conditions.


There have been incredible developments in organic-inorganic hybrid lead halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) recently. In fact, their power conversion efficiency (PCE) has skyrocketed from 3.8 to 22.7% in just a few years1,2,3,4,5. Unfortunately, the hybrid perovskite suffers from unavoidable degradation because the hydrogen-bonding between its monovalent organic cation and octahedral PbI2 is very weak6,7,8,9,10. It degrades to PbI2 under common external stresses, such as electric fields11,12, moisture13,14, photo-oxidation15,16, and UV irradiation17. Substituting the organic cation by inorganic Cs+ to fabricate an all-inorganic perovskite is effective for improved stability under these common stress conditions18,19. Unfortunately, the most ideal black α-CsPbI3 (cubic phase) is thermodynamically less favorable. It spontaneously turns into an undesired δ-CsPbI3 orthorhombic phase under ambient conditions20.

There has been extensive research into the preparation of CsPbI3 solar cells. For example, Snaith et al.20 fabricated the first CsPbI3 solar cell via an HI additive with the highest PCE of only 2.9%. These trace amounts of HI were incorporated into the crystal lattice to form smaller grains with a distorted structure that stabilizes the cubic phase at room temperature. Luo et al.21 developed a new phase-transition scheme to fabricate α-CsPbI3 solar cells from Cs4PbI6 to increase the PCE to 4.13%. Further advancement has been proven difficult, it has taken more than a year for the PCE to be slowly improved to 4.68%22,23. Recently, vacuum-based vapor deposition was used to improve the PCE to 8.80%24,25. By accurately controlling the stoichiometric ratios of the precursors, Lin et al.26 and Troshin et al.27 increased PCEs to 9.40% and 10.5%, respectively. Unfortunately, all of these devices showed very poor stability, even the well-encapsulated cells lasted for only a few days in an inert atmosphere. Thus, it is critical to improve the stability while increasing the initial PCE.

The size-dependent phase diagrams suggest that the cubic phase becomes more stable when the nano-crystal size is decreased28,29. In particular, Luther et al. fabricatedα-CsPbI3 quantum dots (QDs) PSCs with a markedly improved PCE of 10.77%. Excitingly, this solar cell remained stable for 60 days in a dry environment with no loss of PCE30. Furthermore, high mobility QD films were fabricated by passivating surface of the α-CsPbI3 QDs using a halide salt with PCE of the corresponding solar cell being increased to 13.43%31. More recently, long-chain ammonium additives were found to have a profound impact on the resulted material structure and stability32. For instance, Zhao et al.33 found that the HPbI3+x intermediate facilitates the formation of α-CsPbI3 films at lower temperature, while the ethylenediamine cations help stabilize the black α-CsPbI3 phase, making it possible to attain high cell efficiency of 11.8% with long-term stability for months. Kuang et al.34 introduced a bulky ammonium to form a stable two-dimensional CsPbI3-based PSC with a PCE of 4.84%. The initial PCE of This sample decreased slightly after being aged under ambient condition for over 30 days. Later, by using sulfobetaine zwitterions to stabilize the α-CsPbI3 film, Huang et al.35 developed PSCs with a PCE reaching up to 11.4% while it maintained 85% of its initial PCE after being stored in air exceeding 30 days.

The cubic phase can also be stabilized via partially substituting the I with Br ions36 to form CsPbBrxI3−x37,38,39,40. In particular, CsPbBr3, CsPbBr2I, CsPbI2Br, and CsPbI2+xBr1-x have been used to fabricate PSCs with highly PCEs of 9.72%41, 8.02%42, 14.81%43, and 14.4%44, respectively, with good phase stability over several months. Unfortunately, the Br incorporation increases the band gap that is already too large for high-efficiency PSCs. It is also found that partial substitution of Cs+ and Pb2+ with smaller radius metal cations also improves the stability45. In fact, solar cells based on Cs0.925K0.075PbI2Br, CsPb0.9Sn0.1IBr2, CsPb0.96Bi0.04I3, and CsPb0.98Mn0.02I2Br also show respectable PCEs of 10.0046, 11.3347, 13.2148, and 13.47%49, respectively. In early 2013, based on theoretical calculations, Kanatzidis et al.50 proposed to use the distorted orthorhombic phase in perovskite solar cells. Later, Even et al.51 and Snaith et al.52 discovered that lower-symmetry (β-CsPbI3 and γ-CsPbI3) perovskites show much lower phase-transition temperature (260 and 175 °C, respectively) than the undistorted α-CsPbI3 (360 °C). These results suggest that the lower-symmetry perovskite orthorhombic black phase is beneficial to high stability devices53.

Herein, by mixing hydroiodic acid (HI) and phenylethylammonium iodine (PEAI) additives into the CsPbI3 precursor solution, we fabricate stabilized and distorted black phase-based CsPbI3 thin films with excellent crystallinity. To our surprise, the PCE of the CsPbI3 PSC is increased to 15.07%—the highest yet reported for this type of inorganic perovskite cell. The performance is also remarkably stable under ambient conditions.


Figure 1a shows the common yellow (δ-, Pnma) and black (α-, Pm3m) phases of the CsPbI3 films. According to the phase diagram, the desired α-CsPbI3 phase is stable only at high temperature (higher than 360 °C). The transition from the δ-phase to the α-phase indicates an obvious dynamic motion of the [PbI6/2] octahedral51. Upon cooling, it is first converted into the distorted black perovskite β-CsPbI3 (P4/mbm), γ-CsPbI3 (Pbnm), and then to yellow δ-CsPbI3 at 260, 175, and 25 °C, respectively. The four phases reported and their corresponding XRD patterns are given in Supplementary Fig. 151. Note that the yellow δ phase consists of double-chains of non-corner-sharing [PbI6/2] octahedral, while the other three black phases show obviously corner-sharing [PbI6/2] octahedral53,54. Furthermore, the XRD peaks of the distorted phases (β-CsPbI3, γ-CsPbI3) are slightly splitted relative to the α-CsPbI355.

Fig. 1

Structure and energy level: a Schematic of common CsPbI3 phases; b HI-induced and PEAI-stabilized distorted black CsPbI3 orthorhombic phase; c Schematic device structure; d energy level

We fabricated a distorted black phase CsPbI3 by using a small amount of HI and PEAI (Fig. 1b). Here, the HI is reported to firstly form the hydrogen lead iodide (HPbI3+x) intermediate with PbI2, which helps to grow the above-mentioned distorted phases (β-CsPbI3, γ-CsPbI3)33. The PEAI plays a dominant part in the nucleation and growth of the CsPbI3 film, in addition, it stabilizes the distorted black phase by hindering the phase transition through steric effects. For solar cell evaluation, a typical normal cell structure (glass substrate/fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)/TiO2/CsPbI3/Poly[bis(4-phenyl) (2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine] (PTAA)/Au) was used (Fig. 1c). Figure 1d shows the energy level band diagram. The energy levels of each layer were measured as reported previously39. The valence bands were obtained via ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS)56,57, and the conduction bands were estimated using the band gap derived from the optical absorption spectra.

A control film was synthesized using only PEAI without HI. It does not yield the dark perovskite phase even after annealing at 150 °C for 3 h. Therefore, we exclude it from the following discussion, and HI was used for all CsPbI3 films discussed below. The films prepared without the PEAI are termed as w/o PEAI, and the films with PEAI are labeled as w PEAI. In the present study, the amount of HI additive is further optimized to obtain larger grain size with desired film morphology. For this purpose, smaller amount of HI (100 μl) was used to carefully control the amount of HPbI3+x formed to allow longer time of annealing at 150 °C to achieve the optimal crystal growth. Microscopic imaging was used to examine the CsPbI3 films at each stage of growth and treatment.

Supplementary Figs. 2a, 3a show optical microscopy (OM) images with lower resolution photos as insets. Supplementary Figs. 2b, 3b present high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the sample surfaces. Supplementary Fig. 3c shows atomic force microscope (AFM) images for the samples prepared with PEAI annealed at 150 °C for different length of time up to 10 h. Both films prepared with and without PEAI show small crystalline domain sizes of about 100 nm, smooth surfaces, and yellow in color before annealing. The statistics of crystal size distributions are given in Supplementary Fig. 4. It is clear that the longer the annealing time, the larger the grain size. In other words, the grains grow larger during the annealing process.

We observed that the CsPbI3 film is formed rapidly upon the deposition of the precursor solution. With increasing the annealing time, the as-deposited yellow film quickly turns into black, with increased crystalline domain size, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. Without the PEAI additive, the blackest uniform sample was obtained after annealing for only 1 h. Further heat treatment produces isolated yellow spots as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2a, suggesting that part of the sample has gone through a phase transition from the black phase to the yellow δ phase. As the process continues, the yellow spots became larger and larger, until they finally turn into a complete yellow film, identified to be the δ-CsPbI3 phase by X-ray diffraction (XRD) shown in Fig. 2. In comparison, when PEAI was used, it took up to 2 h of annealing before the black uniform film was completely formed, indicating that the CsPbI3 formation process is slower. Further heating beyond 2 h would result in yellow pinholes.

Fig. 2

Performance of the fabricated films: Comparison of the CsPbI3 films without and with PEAI annealed at 150 °C for various times: a, c optical absorption spectra; b, d XRD patterns

To gain insights into the phase transition mechanism, we measured optical absorption, XRD, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 2a, c compares the absorption spectra of the CsPbI3 films fabricated at different annealing time at 150 °C. It shows that the highest absorbance for the CsPbI3 films without and with PEAI occurred after annealing for 1 and 2 h, respectively. Further annealing leads to decreased absorption intensities for the black phase, while the absorption peak at 420 nm for the δ-CsPbI3 phase increases, suggesting that the black CsPbI3 are partially transitioned into the yellow δ-CsPbI3 phase. These results are consistent with the optical photographs. On the other hand, the surface elemental distributions of the films as analyzed using the XPS spectra (Supplementary Fig. 5) do not show any change with annealing time, indicating that the change in optical absorbance is due to evolution of the crystalline structure.

The XRD patterns were compared to the reference (Supplementary Fig. 1). There is no obvious difference between the films with and without PEAI before the annealing treatment. After annealing the sample for 1 h, the CsPbI3 film prepared without PEAI shows optimum crystallization with surplus HPbI3+x (Fig. 2b)58. As the annealing time is prolonged, the intensities of the distorted-phase-based CsPbI3 peaks decrease, and the δ-CsPbI3 phase peaks start to appear. Finally, the film is transitioned completely into the δ-CsPbI3 phase. In comparison, the CsPbI3 formed with PEAI (Fig. 2d) shows well defined peaks of distorted CsPbI3 phase after annealing for 2 h, demonstrating that the PEAI did not alter the crystalline structure of the perovskite film. Furthermore, careful examination shows that the distorted black phase transited from β to the γ phase during the annealing process, as identified by the XRD peaks slowly shifting from 14.2° to 14.3° (Supplementary Fig. 6).

The effect of the PEAI was further studied by comparing the optimized distorted black phase-based CsPbI3 films deposited without and with PEAI. Cross-sectional SEM images (Supplementary Fig. 7a), UV–vis absorption spectra (Supplementary Fig. 7b), and photoluminescence (PL) spectra (Supplementary Fig. 7c) show that there is no obvious difference between the films prepared without and with the PEAI doping after they are annealed. Both films show same band gap of 1.69 eV, slightly lower than the value of 1.73 eV as reported in literature59. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Supplementary Fig. 7d) and the vertical composition profiles from the surface (Supplementary Fig. 8) show clear characteristic peaks assigned to Cs 3d, Pb 4f, and I 3d, confirming that the added PEAI did not affect the composition of the films. Meanwhile, the other peaks show no change or shifting after adding the PEAI, indicating that the PEAI molecules bond to the surface of the crystal grain units only for the PEA+ are too large to be inset into the CsPbI3 cages53. Furthermore, the XRD results in Supplementary Fig. 7e show that the crystallization quality obviously improved by the PEAI additive. The orientation was obviously optimized as the XRD does not show peaks for (111), (020), and (120), likely because the PEA+ ions act as steric hindrance during the CsPbI3 crystal growth, leading to preferred orientation for (001), (110), (002), and (220). The energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis and contact angle measurements, shown in Supplementary Fig. 9 further confirm that PEAI is distributed uniformly in the grain boundary and surface.

Figure 3a presents a schematic diagram for the HI and PEAI additive-induced CsPbI3 crystalline growth. From the results, we infer that: (1) initially, HI reaction with PbI2 as intermediate HPbI3+x, and it creates distorted black phase-based CsPbI3 after combined with CsI during annealing at 150 °C. The results are consistent with previous studies58,60. (2) PEAI does not cause any change in the chemical composition of the final crystal structure, and likely plays only significant role in the nucleation and growth of CsPbI3 films that lead to oriented crystal growth. (3) the PEAI acts as a blocking element to hinder the phase transition by bonding to the crystal units and through the steric effect. Supplementary Fig. 10 shows that the film without PEAI degraded within a few days for the black phase to transition to the yellow phase. Moreover, the PEAI based CsPbI3 film can retain the black color even after being heated at 80 °C for 120 h, while the reference film shows yellow spots in only 40 h (Supplementary Fig. 11). In summary, the distorted black phase-based CsPbI3 films obtained using the HI and PEAI additives show excellent properties, including large grain size, better thermal stability and lower band gap.

Fig. 3

Mechanism of HI/PEAI-induced phase stability: a Schematic for HI/PEAI additive-induced CsPbI3 crystal growth. b TGA and DSC spectra for the CsPbI3 film with PEAI. c FTIR spectra, and d 1H liquid-state NMR spectra for the related films

The thermal stability of the present CsPbI3 system was further confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), as shown in Fig. 3b. When the sample is heated in nitrogen, no mass loss was observed until it gets from room temperature to 225 °C, at which point the film starts to decompose. The addition of PEAI is not found to have any detectable effect on thermal stability of the perovskite film (Supplementary Fig. 12) except that it starts to evaporate or decompose at about 300 °C. To confirm that the PEAI is indeed incorporated into the film, we examined the films (PEAI, CsPbI3, and CsPbI3 film with PEAI) using the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Fig. 3c). Clearly, the spectrum of the CsPbI3 film with PEAI shows absorption bands centered at 695, 743, 927, and 1121 cm−1 that are signatures of the benzene ring in the PEA+. Moreover, a peak at 1487 cm−1 is also resolved, ascribed to the N-H scissor bending in the PEA+37. All these results attest the existence of PEA+ in the CsPbI3 film. Meanwhile, careful comparison of the FTIR spectrum with that of the pure PEAI show that, all above peaks are shifted to smaller wavenumbers, demonstrating strong interaction between the functional groups of PEA+ and CsPbI361. We believe that one major reason is the chemical bonding between the PEAI and the CsPbI333,62. To further prove that significant amount of PEA+ is in the film, the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement was conducted on the dissolved sample in deuterated DMSO-d6 solution (Fig. 3d). The pure PEAI gives two peaks at δ = 7.3 and 3 ppm, attributed to the benzene ring and its branched chain group, respectively. For the CsPbI3 film prepared with PEAI, the above two peaks shifted to downfield by Δδ ≈ 0.1 ppm, indicating strong interaction between the PEA+ and CsPbI363.

Finally, the films based PSCs were fabricated to evaluate their photovoltaic performance. The current density (J)–voltage (V) curves and photovoltaic parameters are presented in Supplementary Fig. 13 and Supplementary Table 1. Clearly, the optimal annealing conditions for the cells agree with the values reported above. The results for the CsPbI3 films (w/o PEAI) are shown in Supplementary Fig. 14. It shows a remarkable cell PCE of 11.50%, with open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.991 V, short-circuit current density (JSC) of 16.94 mA cm−2, and fill factor (FF) of 68.6%. The cell performance improves significantly when PEAI is introduced. When the film is optimized, the VOC, JSC, FF, and PCE are 1.059 V, 18.95 mA cm−2, 75.1, and 15.07%, respectively. Figure 4a presents typical JV curves measured using both reverse and forward scan directions with the key parameters summarized in the inset. It is clear that the JV curves measured using both scan directions overlap well with each other. In other words, the hysteresis of the present devices is negligible. It is known that the VOC deficit which defined by Eg/q-VOC limits the PCE efficiencies64. Here, Eg is the optical band gap and q electron charge. The VOC deficit for our fabricated CsPbI3 PSCs is 0.631 eV, larger than the best reported for organic–inorganic hybrid solar cells65, indicating to further increase device performance, reducing defect density in CsPbI3 layer or the interfaces are urgently expected.

Fig. 4

Performance of the best device with PEAI: a JV characteristics, b EQE, c steady-state measurement of the PCE, d long-term stability of the best-performing device, e histogram of device efficiency distribution over 50 cells, and f PCE distribution of CsPbI3 PSCs as a function of band gap relative to published papers

The incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) shows an integrated JSC value of 18.86 mA cm−2 (Fig. 4b), which matches well with the value from the JV curve. Figure 4c presents the steady PCE versus time while being biased at the maximum power point (0.86 V); the champion device exhibits a very stable PCE and less than 3% efficiency loss after 100 h of measurements. Long-term stability is critical for the perovskite solar cells. Figure 4d shows that the device maintains 92% of its best PCE value after storage in air (relative humidity of 20 to 30% at about 25 °C) for over 60 days without any encapsulation. To test the light stability, the bare device without any encapsulation was placed under constant AM 1.5G illumination in a nitrogen filled glovebox for more than 300 h. The device had negligible efficiency loss (Supplementary Fig. 15) demonstrating its steadiness to the light irradiation.

The PCE distribution for a batch of 50 solar cells is also shown in Fig. 4e. The data demonstrate that the devices are highly reproducible with an average PCE of 14.6%. The best CsPbI3 film-based device prepared here without PEAI demonstrated poor stability with PCE degradation to 0.65% after storage in ambient environment for 8 days (Supplementary Fig. 14). We also compared the results to those of other reported CsPbI3 PSCs. Figure 4f plots PCE versus band gap for the previously reported high PCE PSCs formed using various processing methods18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. Our device with a distorted black phase-based CsPbI3 achieved the best PCE.


In conclusion, we report an all-inorganic perovskite film based on distorted black phase CsPbI3. By introducing HI and PEAI additives, a well crystallized black phase-based CsPbI3 film is produced. The optimized PSC shows a record PCE of 15.07% with remarkable stability. It is expected that these distorted black phase CsPbI3 perovskites have significant potential applications in other optoelectronic devices in the future.


Precursor solutions preparation

The CsPbI3 precursor solution used HPbI3+x (0.88 g) and CsI (0.36 g) dissolved in 2 ml DMF/DMSO (v/v 9:1) in N2 atmosphere in a glovebox under active stirring for 24 h. The CsPbI3-PEAI precursor solution with 100 μl PEAI DMF solution (100 mg ml−1) was then added to the above CsPbI3 precursor solution under active stirring for 6 h. A HTL solution was prepared by dissolving PTAA (36 mg), a sulfonyl imide (Li-TFSI, 22 μl, 520 mg Li-TFSI in 1 ml acetonitrile), and tert-butylpyridine (TBP, 36 μl) in 1 ml of CB solution.

Device fabrication

A 25 × 25 mm2 piece of clean FTO substrate was surface treated using an O2 plasma, and then the compact TiO2 layer coated on the FTO was formed by immersing FTO in a 40 mM TiCl4 aqueous solution at 70 °C. Then, the CsPbI3 layer was fabricated via spin-coating of the solution onto the substrate. Finally, the films were annealed at 150 °C for various time to form the films. PTAA layer was prepared by spin-coating the related precursor onto the CsPbI3 film. A 70-nm-thick gold electrode was then thermally evaporated onto the HTL-coated film.


The film surface morphology and cross-sectional images were characterized by FESEM and EDS (Jeol SU-8020). The AFM images were acquired using a Veeco NanoScope IV with a silicon cantilever. Contact angles were measured on an OCA20 instrument (Data-physics). Absorbance spectra were collected using a Shimadzu UV-3600 double beam spectrometer. The PL spectra were measured using a PicoQuant FluoTime 300. The source light was a xenon short arc lamp. XRD patterns of the samples were measured using a Bruker D8 GADDS Diffractometer with the Cu Kα line. The XPS measurements were performed in a VG ESCALAB MK2 system with monochromatized Al Kα radiation. TGA/DSC was performed using a TGA Q50 (TA Instruments) and DSC Q2000 (TA Instruments), respectively. FTIR spectra observations of samples were carried out on a Bruker EQUINX55 spectrometer. Liquid-state NMR spectra were conducted on a VNMRS 600 instrument. The device active area was 0.1156 cm2 (3.4 mm × 3.4 mm), and a mask with an aperture area of 0.09028 cm2 was used to prevent any scattered light or light piping to contribute to the photocurrent. The light source was performed via the solar simulator (SS-F5-3A, Enlitech) along with AM 1.5 G spectra whose intensity was calibrated by the certified standard silicon solar cell (SRC-2020, Enlitech) at 100 mW cm−2. J–V curves were measured using reverse scan mode (from VOC to ISC) and forward scan mode (from ISC to VOC) with a scan rate of 30 mV s−1. The spectral response was taken by an EQE measurement system (QE-R, Enlitech). The long-term stability was measured after storage in air (relative humidity of 20 to 30% at 25 °C) over 60 days without any encapsulation. To test the device light stability, we put the unencapsulated device in a nitrogen glovebox under constant AM 1.5G illumination.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

  • 19 November 2018

    In the original version of this Article, the author name ‘Shengzhong Liu’ was incorrectly given as ‘Liu Shengzhong’. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


  1. 1.

    Jiang, Q. et al. Enhanced electron extraction using SnO2 for high-efficiency planar-structure HC(NH2)2PbI3-based perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 2, 16177 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bi, C. et al. Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7747 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wu, Y. et al. Perovskite solar cells with 18.21% efficiency and area over 1 cm2 fabricated by heterojunction engineering. Nat. Energy 1, 16148 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhang, X. et al. Graphdiyne quantum dots for much improved stability and efficiency of perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1701117 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jiang, J. et al. CsPbCl3 driven low-trap-density perovskite grain growth for >20% solar cell efficiency. Adv. Sci. 5, 1800474 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Giordano, F. et al. Enhanced electronic properties in mesoporous TiO2 via lithium doping for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10379 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Svane, K. L. et al. How strong is the hydrogen bond in hybrid perovskites? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 6154–6159 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li, B. et al. Constructing water-resistant CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films via coordination interaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 17018–17024 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Feng, J. et al. E-beam evaporated Nb2O5 as an effective electron transport layer for large flexible perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 36, 1–8 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jin, Z. et al. Solution-processed transparent coordination polymer electrode for photovoltaic solar cells. Nano Energy 40, 376–381 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leijtens, T. et al. Mapping electric field-induced switchable poling and structural degradation in hybrid lead halide perovskite thin films. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500962 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bae, S. et al. Electric-field-induced degradation of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3091–3096 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang, F. et al. Phenylalkylamine passivation of organolead halide perovskites enabling high-efficiency and air-stable photovoltaic cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 9986–9992 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jiang, J. et al. Polymer doping for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells with improved moisture stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1701757 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang, H. et al. Efficient and selective photocatalytic oxidation of benzylic alcohols with hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite materials. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 755–759 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Brennan, M. C., Draguta, S., Kamat, P. V. & Kuno, M. Light-induced anion phase segregation in mixed halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 204–213 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang, Q. et al. Energy-down-shift CsPbCl3:Mn quantum dots for boosting the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1479–1486 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen, H. et al. Inorganic perovskite solar cells: a rapidly growing field. Sol. RRL 2, 1700188 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sim, K. M., Swarnkar, A., Nag, A. & Chung, D. S. Phase stabilized α-CsPbI3 perovskite nanocrystals for photodiode applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 12, 1700209 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Eperon, G. E. et al. Inorganic caesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 19688–19695 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Luo, P. et al. Solvent engineering for ambient-air-processed, phase-stable CsPbI3 in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3603–3608 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ripolles, T. S., Nishinaka, K., Ogomi, Y., Miyata, Y. & Hayase, S. Efficiency enhancement by changing perovskite crystal phase and adding a charge extraction interlayer in organic amine free-perovskite solar cells based on cesium. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 144, 532–536 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Sutton, R. J. et al. Bandgap-tunable cesium lead halide perovskites with high thermal stability for efficient solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502458 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hutter, E. M. et al. Vapour-deposited cesium lead iodide perovskites: microsecond charge carrier lifetimes and enhanced photovoltaic performance. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1901–1908 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yonezawa, K. et al. Annealing effects on CsPbI3-based planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells formed by vacuum deposition method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 56, 04CS11 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chen, C. Y. et al. All-vacuum-deposited stoichiometrically balanced inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite solar cells with stabilized efficiency exceeding 11%. Adv. Mater. 29, 1605290 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Frolova, L. A. et al. Highly efficient all-inorganic planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells produced by thermal coevaporation of CsI and PbI2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 67–72 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Jin, Z., Zhang, J. & Liu, F. S. Stable ultra-fast broad-bandwidth photodetectors based on alpha-CsPbI3 perovskite and NaYF4:Yb,Er quantum dots. Nanoscale 9, 6278–6285 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang, Q. et al. μ-Graphene crosslinked CsPbI3 quantum dots for high efficiency solar cells with much improved stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800007 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Swarnkar, A. et al. Quantum dot-induced phase stabilization of α-CsPbI3 perovskite for high-efficiency photovoltaics. Science 354, 92–95 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sanehira, E. M. et al. Enhanced mobility CsPbI3 quantum dot arrays for record-efficiency, high-voltage photovoltaic cells. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao4204 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li, F. et al. Tailored dimensionality to regulate phase stability for inorganic cesium lead iodide perovskites. Nanoscale 10, 6318–6322 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang, T. et al. Bication lead iodide 2D perovskite component to stabilize inorganic α-CsPbI3 perovskite phase for high-efficiency solar cells. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700841 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Liao, J.-F., Rao, H.-S., Chen, B.-X., Kuang, D.-B. & Su, C.-Y. Dimension engineering on cesium lead iodide for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 2066–2072 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, Q. et al. Stabilizing the α-phase of CsPbI3 perovskite by sulfobetaine zwitterions in one-step spin-coating films. Joule 1, 371–382 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zheng, X. et al. Improved phase stability of formamidinium lead triiodide perovskite by strain relaxation. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 1014–1020 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhang, X. et al. All-ambient processed binary CsPbBr3-CsPb2Br5 perovskites with synergistic enhancement for high-efficiency Cs-Pb-Br-based solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 7145–7154 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ma, Q., Huang, S., Wen, X., Green, M. A. & Ho-Baillie, A. W. Y. Hole transport layer free inorganic CsPbIBr2 perovskite solar cell by dual source thermal evaporation. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502202 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang, J. et al. 3D-2D-0D interface profiling for record efficiency all-inorganic CsPbBrI2 perovskite solar cells with superior stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703246 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Liu, C. et al. All-Inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells with high efficiency exceeding 13%. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 3825–3828 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Duan, J., Zhao, Y., He, B. & Tang, Q. High-purity inorganic perovskite films for solar cells with 9.72 % efficiency. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1–6 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li, W. et al. Phase segregation enhanced ion movement in efficient inorganic CsPbIBr2 solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700946 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bai, D. et al. Temperature-assisted crystallization for inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells to attain high stabilized efficiency 14.81%. Nano Energy 52, 408–415 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bian, H. et al. Graded bandgap CsPbI2+xBr1-x perovskite solar cells with a stabilized efficiency of 14.4%. Joule 2, 1500–1510 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Swarnkar, A., Mir, W. J. & Nag, A. Can B-site doping or alloying improve thermal- and phase-stability of all-inorganic CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) perovskites? ACS Energy Lett. 3, 286–289 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nam, J. K. et al. Potassium incorporation for enhanced performance and stability of fully inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 17, 2028–2033 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Liang, J. et al. CsPb0.9Sn0.1IBr2 based all-inorganic perovskite solar cells with exceptional efficiency and stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14009–14012 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hu, Y. et al. Bismuth incorporation stabilized α-CsPbI3 for fully inorganic perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 2219–2227 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bai, D. et al. Interstitial Mn2+-driven high-aspect-ratio grain growth for low-trap-density microcrystalline films for record efficiency CsPbI2Br solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 970–978 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Stoumpos, C. C., Malliakas, C. D. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. 52, 9019–9038 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Marronnier, A. et al. Anharmonicity and disorder in the black phases of cesium lead iodide used for stable inorganic perovskite solar cells. ACS Nano 12, 3477–3486 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Sutton, R. J. et al. Cubic or Orthorhombic? Revealing the crystal structure of metastable black-phase CsPbI3 by theory and experiment. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1787–1794 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fu, Y. et al. Selective stabilization and photophysical properties of metastable perovskite polymorphs of CsPbI3 in thin films. Chem. Mater. 29, 8385–8394 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Huang, Y., Yin, W.-J. & He, Y. Intrinsic point defects in inorganic cesium lead iodide perovskite CsPbI3. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 1345–1350 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Laurita, G., Fabini, D. H., Stoumpos, C. C., Kanatzidis, M. G. & Seshadri, R. Chemical tuning of dynamic cation off-centering in the cubic phases of hybrid tin and lead halide perovskites. Chem. Sci. 8, 5628–5635 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Jin, Z. et al. Graphdiyne:ZnO nanocomposites for high-performance UV photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 28, 3697–3702 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Jin, Z. et al. Graphdiyne: an efficient hole transporter for stable high-performance colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 5284–5289 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Feng, W., Hui, Y., Haihua, X. & Ni, Z. HPbI3: a new precursor compound for highly efficient solution-processed perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 1120–1126 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Xiang, S. et al. Highly air-stable carbon-based α-CsPbI3 perovskite solar cells with a broadened optical spectrum. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1824–1831 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Wang, Y., Zhang, T., Xu, F., Li, Y. & Zhao, Y. A facile low temperature fabrication of high performance CsPbI2Br all-inorganic perovskite solar cells. Sol. RRL 2, 1700180 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Li, B. et al. Surface passivation engineering strategy to fully-inorganic cubic CsPbI3 perovskites for high-performance solar cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 1076 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zhang, T. et al. In situ fabrication of highly luminescent bifunctional amino acid crosslinked 2D/3D NH3C4H9COO(CH3NH3PbBr3)n perovskite films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1603568 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ravi, V. K. et al. Origin of the substitution mechanism for the binding of organic ligands on the surface of CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocubes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 4988–4994 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zewen, X. & Yanfa, Y. Progress in theoretical study of metal halide perovskite solar cell materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1701136 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Huang, J., Yuan, Y., Shao, Y. & Yan, Y. Understanding the physical properties of hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17042 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China MOST (2017YFA0204800), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (GK201703026/GK201804002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (61704099), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2018JQ6072), and the 111 Project (B14041).

Author information




The project was conceived, planned, and supervised by Z.J. K.W., Z.J. and Q.W. performed the experiments, data analysis, and experimental planning. The manuscript was written by K.W. and Z.J. L.L., H.B., D.B., H.W. and J.Z. performed the experiments and reviewed the manuscript. S.L. supervised the overall project, discussed the results, and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiwen Jin or Qian Wang or Shengzhong Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, K., Jin, Z., Liang, L. et al. All-inorganic cesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells with stabilized efficiency beyond 15%. Nat Commun 9, 4544 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing