Gap junction protein Connexin-43 is a direct transcriptional regulator of N-cadherin in vivo

Kotini, Maria; Barriga, Elias H.; Leslie, Jonathan; Gentzel, Marc; Rauschenberger, Verena; Schambony, Alexandra; Mayor, Roberto

doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06368-x

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 21 September 2018

Gap junction protein Connexin-43 is a direct transcriptional regulator of N-cadherin in vivo

Maria Kotini¹^na1,
Elias H. Barriga^1,2^na1,
Jonathan Leslie¹,
Marc Gentzel³^nAff5,
Verena Rauschenberger⁴,
Alexandra Schambony ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8771-5487⁴ &
…
Roberto Mayor¹

Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 3846 (2018) Cite this article

22k Accesses
99 Citations
12 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 01 November 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Connexins are the primary components of gap junctions, providing direct links between cells under many physiological processes. Here, we demonstrate that in addition to this canonical role, Connexins act as transcriptional regulators. We show that Connexin 43 (Cx43) controls neural crest cell migration in vivo by directly regulating N-cadherin transcription. This activity requires interaction between Cx43 carboxy tail and the basic transcription factor-3, which drives the translocation of Cx43 tail to the nucleus. Once in the nucleus they form a complex with PolII which directly binds to the N-cadherin promoter. We found that this mechanism is conserved between amphibian and mammalian cells. Given the strong evolutionary conservation of connexins across vertebrates, this may reflect a common mechanism of gene regulation by a protein whose function was previously ascribed only to gap junctional communication.

Simultaneous single-cell three-dimensional genome and gene expression profiling uncovers dynamic enhancer connectivity underlying olfactory receptor choice

Article Open access 15 April 2024

Honggui Wu, Jiankun Zhang, … X. Sunney Xie

Spatially organized cellular communities form the developing human heart

Article Open access 13 March 2024

Elie N. Farah, Robert K. Hu, … Neil C. Chi

Complex activity and short-term plasticity of human cerebral organoids reciprocally connected with axons

Article Open access 10 April 2024

Tatsuya Osaki, Tomoya Duenki, … Yoshiho Ikeuchi

Introduction

Gap junctions are transmembrane complexes of connexin proteins that allow intercellular communication and the transfer of ions and small signaling molecules between adjacent cells¹. In addition to their channel functions at the plasma membrane, connexins can produce small fragments or isoforms that are present in different cellular compartments including the nucleus² and thus may function in alternative processes, such as gene expression^3,4.

The mutual regulation in the assembly of gap and adherens junctions^5,6 suggests a possible coordination in the expression of their constituent proteins. Collective cell migration, which is fundamental for morphogenesis and cancer invasion⁷, depends on both gap and adherens junctions⁸. In mice, the gap junction protein Connexin 43 (Cx43) is essential for the formation of heart structures like the conotruncus. This role is attributed to the function of Cx43 in cardiac neural crest cells, which migrate to the target tissue and contribute to heart development^9,10. In many systems, embryonic neural crest cells can undergo collective cell migration^7,11 and require a tight regulation of the expression of the adherens junction protein N-cadherin^12,13. Both N-cadherin and Cx43 modulate cell migration^14,15 and their interaction has been furthered explored in mesenchymal cells, where Cx43 was shown to modify the levels of N-cadherin at the cell membrane¹⁶. However, the mechanism driving this regulation remains unknown.

Here, we ask whether Cx43, one of the most widely studied gap junction proteins, regulates N-cadherin expression during collective cell migration and investigate the molecular nature of such regulation. We show that Cx43, a molecule primarily known for its membrane-linked activities, uses its tail isoform to control morphogenetic movements via transcriptional regulation of N-cadherin. This nuclear activity is independent of its function as channel in the cell membrane. Moreover, we identify its mechanism of action, showing that Cx43 regulation of N-cadherin is due to a direct interaction with the basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3). BTF3 is able to form a stable complex with polymerase II and is part of the transcription initiation complex^17,18. In more recent studies, BTF3 upregulation has been correlated with tumor prognosis^19,20 and the transcriptional activity of BTF3 has been implicated in proliferation and cancer progression^20,21. Here, we demonstrate that Cx43-tail, BTF3 and Pol II altogether form a complex that directly binds to the n-cad promoter to modulate N-cadherin transcription. Furthermore, we show that this unexpected activity of Cx43 as a regulator of N-cadherin is conserved between amphibian and mammalian cells.

Results

Cx43 promotes neural crest migration via N-cadherin regulation

To examine the role of Cx43 in neural crest development, we used antisense morpholino knock-down (Cx43MO). Depletion of Cx43 impaired collective chemotaxis of Xenopus cephalic neural crest (Fig. 1a, b; Supplementary Movie 1), without affecting single cell motility (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Movie 2). On the cellular level, we found that Cx43 is essential for cell morphology and polarization (Fig. 1d, e). We next asked whether downregulation of Cx43 affects expression of N-cadherin, which induces cell polarity and is required for neural crest migration^11,12,13. Cx43MO led to a reduction in N-cadherin protein (Fig. 1f–i), whereas the levels of other junctional proteins such as E-cadherin were unaltered (Fig. 1j–l). Analysis by QPCR and in situ hybridization showed that Cx43MO decreased n-cadherin at the mRNA level (Fig. 2a–c), The effects of Cx43MO on neural crest migration (Fig. 2d, e), cell polarity (Fig. 2f, g), protrusions (Fig. 2h, i), and cell dispersion (Fig. 2j, k) were rescued by co-expression of n-cadherin mRNA, showing N-cadherin as the main Cx43 target in this process. Together these results show that Cx43 promotes neural crest migration by controlling N-cadherin levels.

Several experiments were performed to control for the specificity of our antisense morpholino treatments. First, 8–24 ng of two different morpholinos were used and because they generated identical efficiency and phenotypes (Fig. 3c), we show the results of only one of them, hereafter referred as Cx43MO. Second, efficiency of the morpholinos was determined by western blot against Cx43 (Fig. 3a, b), whereas specificity was demonstrated by rescue with Cx43 mRNA that does not bind the morpholinos (Fig. 3c–e). In addition, we showed by grafting experiments that Cx43 MO works in a cell autonomous manner (Fig. 3f) and that specifically affect neural crest migration without interfering with neural crest induction, as none of the early neural crest markers are affected by Cx43MO (Fig. 3g). These experiments show that Cx43MO is a specific inhibitor of Cx43 during neural crest migration.

Cx43 20k isoform controls cell migration via N-cadherin

It has been shown in mammalian cells that Cx43 exists in two forms: the full-length molecule (Cx43FL), which is a component of gap junctions, and smaller carboxy-terminal fragments, being the most abundant the isoform of 20 kDa (Cx43-20k)^22,23. These isoforms are present in many cell systems and their function remains unclear. We determined the presence of Cx43 isoforms in Xenopus neural crest and examined their temporal expression during development. Cx43FL was expressed at similar levels throughout the developmental stages analyzed, whereas expression of shorter Cx43 isoforms, in particular Cx43-20k, increased just before the onset of neural crest migration (Fig. 4a, b, stage 18 onwards), and we confirmed that these Cx43 isoforms are present in neural crest cells (Fig. 4c).

To test the effects of the Cx43-20k on N-cadherin regulation we selectively over-expressed constructs containing or lacking the 20k fragment (Cx43-20k or Cx43Trun, respectively, Fig. 4d). Expression of Cx43-20k led to upregulation of N-cadherin mRNA in Xenopus cells (Fig. 4e–g). Reduction of n-cadherin expression and neural crest migration by Cx43MO can be rescued by Cx43FL or Cx43-20k, but not by Cx43Trun (Fig. 4h–l). In addition, Cx43 was coexpressed with N-cadherin in migrating neural crest (Fig. 5a) and the increase in Cx43-20 levels matched those in n-cadherin expression (Fig. 5b). These results indicate that the Cx43-20k contains the activity that controls N-cadherin expression and neural crest migration.

Next, we asked how this isoform is generated. Consistently with findings in mammalian cells^22,23,24, analysis of the Xenopus Cx43 sequence show several putative internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (Fig. 5c); however, the major Cx43 isoform observed correspond to the 20 kDa peptide (red arrow in Fig. 5d). The Cx43-20k fragment contains two putative IRES (M213 and M279) with predicted sizes for the respective polypeptides of 20 and 11 kDa (Fig. 5c). However, expression of the Cx43-20k fragment in Xenopus embryos only generates a peptide of 20 kDa (Fig. 5e). Furthermore, expression of the Cx43-20k, but not the Cx43-11k, leads to N-cadherin upregulation (Fig. 5f). To further demonstrate that the Cx43-20k isoform is generated by internal translation we showed that mutation of the M213 blocks the production of Cx43-20k (Fig. 5g, h). Consistently with observations performed in mammalian cells²⁴, we observed that the production of Cx43-20k in neural crest cells depends on hypoxia, since the levels of Cx43-20k are reduced or increased during inhibition or activation of the hypoxic factor Hif1α (Fig. 5i, j). Importantly, Hif pathway has been previously shown to be required for neural crest migration²⁵. Together, these data show that like in mammalian cell^22,23,24, Cx43-20k is produced by the internal translation site M213 generating a 20 kDa peptide that is able to control N-cadherin expression.

We show that the presence of Cx43-20k is conserved across species as it is present in mammalian HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and is able to upregulate N-cadherin levels in HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 1b–d) and in amphibian XTC cells (Supplementary Fig. 1e). In addition, inhibition of Cx43 channel activity by two gap junction blockers (F.F.A. and M.F.A.) did not affect N-cadherin expression (Supplementary Fig. 1f–k). Together, these results suggest a role for Cx43-20k in controlling N-cadherin expression and cell migration independent of Cx43 channel activity.

Cx43-20K isoform is a transcriptional regulator of N-cadherin

To understand the underlying cellular mechanism of this transcriptional regulation, we investigated the subcellular localization of Cx43 and Cx43-20k. We observed that Cx43-20k, but not Cx43Trun, localizes in the nucleus of HeLa (Fig. 6a) and neural crest cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Furthermore, an antibody that recognizes the carboxy terminal of Cx43 revealed nuclear localization in neural crest (Supplementary Fig. 2b), HeLa cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c) and XTC cells (Supplementary Fig. 2d). This result was confirmed by subcellular fractionation of Xenopus embryos, where Cx43-20k was detected in the nuclear fraction (Supplementary Fig. 2e). To investigate if the nuclear localization of Cx43 is required for N-cadherin expression and cell migration, we fused the binding domain of the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) with GFP-tagged Cx43-20k (Cx43-20kGR-GFP; Fig. 6b). This construct entered the nucleus of neural crest and HeLa cells only in the presence of dexamethasone (dxm)²⁶ (Fig. 6c, i). Inhibition of n-cadherin expression (Fig. 6d–f) and cell migration (Fig. 6g, h) induced by Cx43MO was rescued in embryos injected with Cx43-20kGR-GFP after dxm treatment (Fig. 6d–h). These results suggest that the nuclear localization of Cx43-20k is required for N-cadherin regulation and that this regulation is conserved across different cell types.

We next explored the role of Cx43-20k on N-cadherin regulation. It is possible that Cx43-20k controls n-cadherin mRNA levels by regulating transcription or mRNA degradation. We found no difference in the rate of n-cadherin mRNA degradation between CTLMO and Cx43MO embryos (Fig. 7a–c), indicating that Cx43 does not regulate mRNA stability. To test whether Cx43-20k controls N-cadherin without the need of translation of other genes, we blocked protein synthesis using the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX). Cx43-20kGR-injected embryos treated with CHX, followed by dxm addition, showed an upregulation of N-cadherin expression, similar to non-CHX treated embryos (Fig. 7d, e), suggesting a direct effect of Cx43-20k on n-cadherin transcriptional regulation.

Cx43-20k isoform interacts with the transcription factor BTF3

To further explore the mechanisms underlying N-cadherin regulation and translocation of Cx43-20k isoform to the nucleus, we performed mass spectrometry analysis of Hela cells transfected with Cx43-20k construct. Using 1.3-fold change as a minimal cut-off for consideration between immunoprecipitated (IP) and control samples²⁷, we found 30 candidates that are nuclear proteins and interact with Cx43-20k (Fig. 7f), reflecting potential binding partners that may be involved in N-cadherin regulation. Examination of the Xenopus database (Xenbase) revealed that these 30 candidates are expressed in Xenopus laevis but only one is specifically expressed in migrating neural crest cells (Fig. 7f, g): the BTF3^18,28,29. To test its possible function, we designed a BTF3MO and found that it inhibited neural crest migration and n-cadherin expression, similar to Cx43MO, and both phenotypes are rescued by full length BTF3 mRNA (Fig. 8a–d). BTF3MO decreased endogenous BTF3 levels (Supplementary Fig. 3a), and did not affect neural crest induction (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Co-injection of BTF3MO with Cx43-20k blocked the effects of Cx43-20k alone on n-cadherin expression (Fig. 8e, f) and nuclear localization of Cx43-20k (Fig. 8g), indicating that BTF3 is required for Cx43-20k activity. On the other hand, inhibition of Cx43 by Cx43MO did not affect the nuclear localization of BTF3 (Supplementary Fig. 3c), suggesting that BTF3 localizes to the nucleus even in absence of Cx43, whereas Cx43 requires BTF3 to mediate its subcellular localization. These observations are consistent with the presence of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) in BTF3³⁰ and its absence in Cx43-20k. Indeed, expression of an NLS-depleted BTF3 construct failed to rescue Cx43-20k nuclear localization (Fig. 8h). Knock-down of BTF3 in mammalian cells (Fig. 9a, b) also impaired Cx43-20k nuclear localization (Fig. 9c, d) and blocked N-cadherin expression induced by Cx43-20k (Fig. 9e, f), arguing for a conserved role of BTF3 and Cx43-20k. Altogether these data show that Cx43-20k is translocated to the nucleus via the NLS domain of BTF3 to control N-cadherin expression in amphibian and mammalian cells.

As both BTF3 and Cx43 are localized in the nucleus (Fig. 10a) and BTF3 NLS is required for Cx43-20k nuclear translocation, we hypothesized a direct interaction between these proteins. To test for physical interaction between Cx43-20k and BTF3 in the nucleus, we used bimolecular fluorescence complementation system (BiFC), in which two VENUS components (VC and VN9m) form a fluorescent protein when brought into close apposition³¹. To build the BiFC system we fused the VENUS component (VC) to either Cx43-20k or Cx43Trunc, while the other VENUS component (VN9m) was fused to BTF3. Empty VC was used as a control. Cx43-20kVC co-injected with BTf3VN9m gave a positive signal not observed with other combinations (Fig. 10b). Moreover, this signal was higher in the nucleus (Fig. 10c). These data support a direct interaction between Cx43 and BTF3 in the nucleus.

Cx43-20k isoform and BTF3 binds to n-cadherin promoter

To verify the biochemical interaction of Cx43-20k and BTF3, we performed co-immunoprecipitation (IP). We found that endogenous Cx43-20k and BTF3 co-precipitate in Hela cells (Fig. 10d). Our experiments also confirmed that BFT3 interacts with polymerase II (Pol II; Fig. 10e), as previously shown¹⁷. These results support the notion that three proteins, Cx43Tail, BTF3 and Pol II, interact and may function as a transcriptional complex in the promoter of n-cadherin. To test this possibility, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). We examined whether endogenous Pol II binds to the promoter of n-cadherin in the presence or absence of Cx43, by performing PCR against the n-cadherin promoter region of CTLMO and Cx43MO ChIP samples (Supplementary Fig. 4). We detected Pol II enriched at the n-cadherin promoter in CTLMO ChIP samples, whereas this enrichment was four times lower in ChIP samples collected from Cx43MO-injected embryos (Fig. 10f). These results show that Cx43 is required for Pol II to bind at the n-cadherin promoter region. To test whether Cx43-20k is recruited to the n-cadherin promoter, we performed ChIP using Cx43-20kGFP or GFP (as a negative control) on embryonic lysates. ChIP-PCR analysis showed that Cx43-20k was enriched by three folds at the n-cadherin promoter region (Fig. 10g). Therefore, we propose that Cx43-20k together with BTF3 and Pol II form a complex that controls the transcriptional activity of n-cadherin at its proximal promoter.

Discussion

Although it was formerly speculated that connexin proteins may control gene transcription^2,3,4, there was no direct evidence that this occurred and any underlying molecular mechanism remained unknown. Our results are consistent with previous studies showing that connexin fragments are found within the nucleus⁴, and that inhibition of connexins have significant effects on cell differentiation^2,3,4. In previous studies, it has been proposed that the generation of these connexin fragments is controlled by the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in mammalian cells²², the Mnk1/2 pathway in various cancer cell lines²³ and hypoxic conditions²⁴. It is plausible that similar mechanisms are at play in our system. Indeed, in neural crest, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is present^32,33 and could, therefore, be implicated for the generation of connexin fragments. In our study, we show that Cx43 fragments appear at the onset of neural crest migration which coincide in time and space with the activity of Hif-1α (hypoxia- inducible transcription factor-1), which is known to regulate neural crest migration²⁵. Indeed, our data show that the generation of Cx43 isoforms is regulated by Hif-1α in embryonic Xenopus neural crest, similar to mammalian²⁴.

Here, we show that these connexin fragments directly regulate n-cadherin expression. In mesenchymal cells it has been shown that Cx43 and N-cadherin regulate reciprocally each other’s levels on the cell surfaces and it has been postulated that N-cadherin and Cx43 share similarities in their regulatory pathways¹⁶. Such regulation was mainly attributed to their functions at the cell membranes^16,34. Our results show that Cx43 controls the transcription of N-cadherin, which in turn is required for directional cell migration and cell polarization, a finding that is consistent with known activities of Cx43 in cardiac neural crest in mice^14,15.

Here, we show that Cx43, independent of its regulation on the cell membrane, via its small isoform that localizes at the nucleus directly affects n-cadherin transcription. It is tempting to speculate that Cx43 may control expression of other genes, in other cell types. Former in vitro studies have proposed an indirect role for Cx43 in gene regulation, such as with members of the CCN family or Smads^31,35,36,37. Our data demonstrate that the carboxy-terminal fragment of Cx43 plays a direct role as a transcriptional regulator of gene expression in vivo. Several transcription factors have been shown to regulate n-cadherin gene expression such as FoxD3³⁸ or factors from Sox family, which bind to the enhancer regions of n-cadherin gene³⁹. Gene regulatory networks for the neural crest place N-cadherin downstream of these transcription factors⁴⁰, and our results place Cx43 as an additional regulator of n-cadherin in the neural crest gene regulatory network.

Here, we show that the transcription factor BTF3 binds to the promoter region of n-cadherin⁴¹ with the help of Cx43 and together positively regulate n-cadherin expression. Thus, BTF3, a transcription factor previously associated with gene expression in cancer systems^20,21, regulates embryonic gene expression in neural crest, a cell population that has been likened to cancer cells⁴². Cx43 has been postulated to be upregulated in later stages of neural crest development⁴⁰ as in several cancer systems^43,44, in order to modulate cell migration. Here, we provide evidence that three components associated with embryonic and cancer cell biology are part of a common pathway, an adhesion molecule (N-cadherin), fragments of another adhesion molecule (Cx43) and a transcription factor (BTF3).

In summary, we have identified an original pathway by which an adherens junction component, n-cadherin, is regulated by a protein normally associated with a gap junctional communication. This opens the possibility of cross-talk between processes mediating intercellular communication and cell–cell interaction, unveiling a mechanism of cross-regulation between gap and adherens junctions at the transcriptional level. The high conservation of Cx43 across different taxa and the presence of Cx43Tail in various vertebrate systems may reflect an evolutionary conserved mechanism of gene regulation by a protein previously well-known by its gap junction activity.

Methods

Embryo manipulation

Adult X. laevis were maintained at 17 °C and used according to the regulations of the Biological Service Unit at University College London, complying with the UK Home Office guidelines established in the Animals Act 1986 as described⁴⁵. X. laevis embryos were obtained and staged as previously described^46,47. To specifically target the neural crest, embryos were injected into the animal ventral blastomeres at the eight-cell stage on one side for all experiments, except when embryonic lysates were used. In this case embryos were injected in both animal sides of two-cell stage embryos. Embryo microinjections were performed according to⁴⁸. If required, fluorescein-dextran (FDx; Invitrogen, D1821, 20 ng) or rhodamine-dextran (RDx; Invitrogen, D1824, 20 ng) were used as tracers. Oligomorpholinos against X. laevis Cx43 (Cx43MO1; 8–24 ng, 5′-TTCCTAAGGCACTCCAGTCACCCAT-3′, Cx43MO2; 8–24 ng, 5′-AAAAATGGTTTTCTTGTGGGTCGA-3′) and BTF3 (BTF3MO, 40 ng, 5′- AACGGACCGGGTTTAAAGGCTTCCT-3′) were synthesized and provided by Gene Tools LLC. Equimolar concentrations of standard control morpholino (CTLMO: 3′-ATATTTAACATTGACTCCATTCTCC-5′) were used. The amounts of morpholinos correspond to the amounts injected in one side of eight-cell stage embryos, while the other side was used as an internal control. When embryos were used for collection of embryonic lysates, they were injected at two-cell stage in both animal blastomeres and double of the mentioned dosages were used. To test the efficiency of Cx43MOs on the endogenous cx43 mRNA, we performed western blot analysis. Both Cx43MOs efficiently lowered the protein levels of the endogenous Cx43FL and Cx43iso (Fig. 3a, b). In order to validate BTF3MO efficiency, we tested by immunostaining of neural crest cells the BTF3 protein expression, which showed decreased levels of BTF3 in BTF3MO cells compared to CTLMO (Supplementary Fig. 3a).

In situ hybridization was performed as previously described^49,50. Briefly, embryos were fixed in MEMPFA, followed by overnight hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes, incubated with an AP antibody and AP activity was developed using NBT/BCP substrates. Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were prepared for foxD3⁴⁸ snail2⁵¹, twist⁵², n-cadherin⁵³, C3⁵³, btf3 (Xenbase: XL075i22), and sox10⁵⁴, sox9⁵⁴. C3 (1 μg/ml), snail2 (0.8 μg/ml), foxD3 (2 μg/ml), sox10 (1 μg/ml), sox9 (1 μg/ml), and twist (0.7 μg/ml) were used to assess neural crest induction, twist (0.7 μg/ml) for neural crest migration, n-cadherin (1 μg/mL) to assess expression levels and btf3 (0.7 μg/mL) expression pattern. Whole-mount immunostaining was carried out as previously described⁵⁵ using Cx43 antibody (1:1000, Sigma, C6219). Briefly, embryos were fixed in MEPMFA and incubated overnight with the antibody at the described dilution.

Animal cap explants were dissected from Xenopus blastulas (stage 8) using a standard technique^48,56 and prepared for in situ-hybridization as described above. For animal cap assays, 500 pg mRNA was injected into the animal side of the two blastomeres of two-cell stage embryos. Analysis of ISH was performed on 20–25 embryos per condition for each independent experiment.

Neural crest manipulation and imaging

Neural crest transplants were carried out as previously reported⁵⁷. Briefly, neural crest taken from stage 18 fluorescently labeled embryos were dissected with eyebrow knives and grafted into unlabeled host embryos. For in vitro experiments, cranial neural crest explants were dissected at stage 18 using a standard technique^58,59 and plated on fibronectin (Sigma, F1141) coated dishes as previously described⁵³. For single cell assays, neural crest cells were briefly dissociated in Ca2+/Mg2+-free Danilchick medium⁵³. For each condition, ten embryos transplanted with fluorescent labeled NC were analyzed per experiment.

Immunostaining was performed on neural crest explants as previously described⁵⁴ using anti-N-cadherin (1:50, rat IgG, clone MNCD2, DSHB), anti-E-cadherin (1:250, mouse IgG, clone 5D3, DSHB), anti-BTF3 (1:100, Abcam, ab107213), anti-rabbit IgG Alexa488 (1:500, Invitrogen, A11034) and anti-rat IgG Alexa488 (1:500, LifeTechnologies). When required, 4′,6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 1 μg/mL, Sigma, D9542) and/or phalloidin tetramethylrhodamin-b-isothiocyanate (PhR; 1 μg/mL, Sigma, P1951) were used.

Imaging of fixed embryos was performed using a MZFLIII Leica fluorescence stereomicroscope equipped with a DFC420 Leica camera controlled by Leica IM50 software. Imaging of in vitro neural crest migration was performed using time-lapse cinematography as described previously^53,60. Briefly, neural crest cells were cultured in plastic or glass petri dishes coated with fibronectin, and time-lapse microcopy was started after one hour of in vitro culture. For cell motility and migration, compound microscopes (either an Eclipse 80i Nikon microscope with a Hamamatsu Digital camera or a DMRXA2 Leica microscope with a Hamamatsu Digital camera controlled by Simple PCI program) equipped with motorized stages and a 10×/0.30NA dry lens were used. NC cultures were prepared as described above. Images were acquired every 5 min for a period of 12 h. For cell morphology imaging, a TCS SP8 microscope with a 63 × /0.90NA water immersion objective lenses and controlled by LAS–AF software was used. Fixed cells were imaged using a 63 × /1.4NA oil immersion objective and a Leica TCS SPE confocal microscope controlled by LAS–AF software.

For construct localization or endogenous IF levels, 10–15 NCCs were analyzed for each condition per experiment.

Cell migration and cell morphology analysis

Chemotaxis assay was performed following a standard procedure⁶¹ using heparin acrylic beads (Sigma, H5263) coated with 1 μg/mL purified human stromal cell-derived factor-1 (Sigma, SRP3276). Cell motility and chemotaxis were analyzed using ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov) analysis tools, as described previously^53,60. Briefly, each individual cell was manually tracked using the Manual Tracking plugin of ImageJ, the data were collected and analyzed using the Chemotaxis plugin of ImageJ. Cell morphology was assessed by deploying the circularity index (complete circle = 1) and estimated by ImageJ analysis tools. Cell dispersion was analyzed using Delaunay triangulation algorithm (ImageJ Plugins) and was plotted as average explant triangle area, as described before⁵⁴. Cell protrusive area was analyzed in neural crest cells at the edge of an explant measuring the outgrowing area that derives from two consecutive timeframes with 4 min time interval; these two consecutive frames were subtracted to generate the new area¹². For analysis of cell chemotaxis and cell dispersion 10–15 explants were analyzed per condition for each independent experiment. For cell motility, cell morphology and cell protrusions 15–25 NCCs were analyzed per condition per experiment.

Molecular biology, plasmids, and reagents

For cDNA synthesis, total RNA was isolated from 10–15 embryos stages 23–24 or 10–15 animal caps stage 8 from X. laevis per condition for each independent experiment and three technical replicas were used within each experiment²⁵. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on an Applied Biosystems ABI 7900HT machine using the Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, 4385612) and the following primers: ef-1 forward 5′- ACCCTCCTCTTGGTCGTTT-3′, ef-1 reverse 5′-TTTGGTTTTCGCTGCTTTCT-3′¹⁵, ncad forward 5′-CAGGGACCAGTTGAAGCACT-3′, ncad reverse 5′-TGCCGTGGCCTTAAAGTTAT-3′⁶². n-cad mRNA expression was plotted as relative expression normalized against the housekeeping gene ef-1.

Plasmids: Cx43 constructs were synthesized using the X. laevis Cx43 sequence from cDNA clone (UniGene ID XL.1109) as template. Full length Cx43 (Cx43FL, aa 1–379), Cx43 carboxy terminally truncated construct (Cx43Trunc, aa 1–212) and Cx43-20k construct (Cx43Tail, aa 213–379) were cloned into 5′BamHI/3′XhoI of pCS2+ or pCS2-EGFP vectors. The pCS2-EGFP vector was kindly provided by Dr. Masa Tada. Inducible construct of Cx43Tail was prepared by fusing the Cx43-20kTail (aa 219–379) to the ligand-binding domain of the human GR (aa 512–777). Cx43-20k was cloned into 5′EcoRI/3′SacI and GR into 5′SacI/3′XhoI of pCS2+ and pCS2-EGFP. BTF3 constructs were synthesized using the X. laevis sequence from cDNA clone (UniGene ID XL.3536). BTF3FL (aa 1–162) was cloned into 5′EcoRI/3′XhoI of pCS2+ or pCS2-EGFP. BTF3 deletion construct lacking the NLS region RRKKK (BTF3-dNLS, aa 1–158) was cloned into 5′BamHI/3′ClaI of pCS2+. For the BiFC experiments (Fig. 4b, c), Cx43Tail and Cx43Trunc were cloned into 5′BamHI/3′BamHI of pCS2-VC155. BTF3FL was cloned into 5′BamHI/3′BamHI of pCS2-VN9m. BiFC vectors were kindly provided by Prof James C. Smith. All construct sequences are verified by automated DNA sequencing (Source Biosciences, UK). When required, plasmids were linearized and mRNA transcribed as described before²⁵, using sp6MessageMachine (Ambion). The mRNA constructs injected were: membrane GFP (mGFP, 300 pg), membraneRFP (mRFP, 300 pg) nuclearRFP (nRFP, 300 pg), lifeactin-GFP (400 pg), N-cadherin-GFP (500 pg), Cx43FL (500 pg), Cx43Trunc (500 pg), Cx43-20k (500 pg), BTF3FL (500 pg), BTF3-dNLS (500 pg), Cx43-20k-VC (500 pg), Cx43Trunc-VC (500 pg), and BTF3-VN9m (500 pg). The following plasmids were injected as DNA: pcDNA3.2-Cx43-HA (800 pg/embryo,²²); pcDNA3.2-Cx43-ML-HA (800 pg/embryo;²²); ΔΜ213 Cx43 (800 pg/embryo,⁶³).

All analysis on fluorescent constructs was assessed by normalizing to the background fluorescence and when required, to total cell area fluorescence.

The following reagents were used: flufenamic acid (50 μM for NC explant incubation −100μM for embryo treatment, Sigma, F9005), meclofenamic acid (50 μM for NC explant incubation −100μM for embryo treatment, Sigma, M4531), actinomycin D (20 μM, Sigma, A1410), CHX (10 μM, Sigma, C7698) and ethanol-dissolved dexamethasone (10 μM) was added to the culture medium at stages 14–15 and maintained until neural crest migratory embryonic stages (stage 23). To control the possible leakage of inducible chimeras, a sibling batch of embryos were cultured without dexamethasone and processed for in situ hybridization. For coupling test (testing gap junction channel activity), 10–15 NCCs were analyzed per condition per experiment.

Immunoprecipitation, fractionation, and western blotting

For each condition 10–15 embryos were used for preparation of embryo lysates per experiment. Whole embryos were prepared for western blot after homogenization in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 0.01% Triton-X, pH 8.0) with added protease inhibitors (Roche, 11836153001) and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, 04906837001)^54,64. For western blots, the following antibodies were used: Connexin 43 (Sigma, C6219, 1:1000), N-cadherin (DSHB, clone MNCD2, 1:800), E- cadherin (DSHB, clone 5D3, 1:1000), p42/44 MAPK (Cell Signaling, 9102S, 1:2000), α-tubulin (DSHB, clone 12G10, 1:1000), phospho-histone H3 (Millipore, 06579, 1:2000), GFP (Invitrogen, A11122, 1: 2000), HA-tag (Sigma H6908, 1:2000), rabbit IgG HRP-linked (Amersham ECL, NA934, 1:3000), mouse IgG HRP-linked (Amersham ECL, NA931, 1:3000) and rat IgG HRP-linked (Sigma, A9037, 1:2000). Immunoprecipitation was performed using GFP-Trap^® kit (Chromotek); briefly, cells were suspended in lysis buffer and centrifugated at 20,000×g for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was recovered and the volume adjusted with dilution buffer. Beads were equilibrated in dilution buffer and mixed with the resuspended cell lysate. The mix was magnetically purified and prepared for western blot. Nuclear fraction isolation of X. laevis embryos was performed using differential centrifugation protocols with modifications^64,65. Briefly, stage 18 X. laevis embryo lysates using a 22 G needle and 20 μL homogenization buffer (HB: 250 mM sucrose, 20 mM Hepes, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, phosphatase and protease inhibitors) per embryo. All samples were centrifuged at 250×g for 5 min to remove embryo debris. After collecting the supernatant, it was distributed to three different tubes and spun at three different speeds (400×g, 600×g) for 5 min to isolate the cell nuclei. The postnuclear supernatants were kept for further processing. The nuclear pellets were washed once more in buffer HG and centrifuged at the appropriate speed (400×g, 600×g). Nuclear pellets were then resuspended in 40 μL 10% glycerol/0.1% SDS/1% Triton-X in HB. Appropriate amount of sample buffer was added to each sample, and samples were processed for acrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blot analysis. In order to avoid loading errors, the same membrane was blotted against the loading control after stripping as described before^54,64.

Western blot data were analyzed using ImageJ analysis tools. Image intensities were normalized and the ratio of the protein of interest to loading control (i.e., Mapk or α-tubulin) was calculated, average ratios were plotted. Uncropped blots are included as supplementary figures (Supplementary Figs. 5–7).

Cell cultures

HeLa cells (Leibniz Institute Collections of Microorganisms and Cell Culture, DSMZ, Germany) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, CA, USA) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 10% CO₂ and transfected as indicated using Rotifect (Carl Roth, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Xenopus embryonic fibroblasts (XTC, a kind gift from Ana Losada) were cultured in 67% DMEM/H2O supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 25 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ and transfected as indicated using Viafect (Promega, USA). Plasmids for transfection were as indicated and 10–20 Hela or XTC cells were analyzed for each condition per experiment.

For siRNA experiments, a combination of three siRNA targeted against BTF3 were transfected as described above. A standard siRNA (scrambled siRNA from Sigma) was used as a control. Catalog number for these commercial siRNA against BTF3 are: SASI_Hs01_00124567; SASI_Hs02_00308337; SASI_Hs01_00124566. Cells were collected 48 h after transfection and processed for qPCR, western blot, or Immunohistochemestry experiments. As described in the respective sections.

All cell lines were tested for mycoplasma contamination.

Immunohistochemestry and phalloidin staining

For protein detection, mammalian cells or neural crest explants were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in 0.2% PBS-T (PBS + 0.2% Triton X-100) for 10-min and blocked with 10% NGS for 1 h. Primary antibodies were incubated ON at 4 °C in 10% NGS. The following antibodies were used: 1/100 anti-BTF3 (Abcam, ab107213), 2.5 µg/ml of anti-N-cadherin (MNCD2 Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), and 1:100 anti-Cx43 (Sigma, C6219) in 10% NGS and incubated ON at 4 °C. Explants were washed 3 times with PBS + 0.2% Tween-20 and incubated ON at 4 °C with secondary antibody, diluted at 1:350 in 10% NGS. DAPI was diluted at 1:1000 and mixed with the secondary antibodies.

Mass spectrometry

For co-immunoprecipitation of the FLAG-tagged Cx43Tail for mass spectrometric analysis cells were lysed and lysates were incubated overnight with anti-HA and equilibrated high affinity beads at 4 °C, the immunoprecipitates were then washed and eluted²⁷. Subsequently of acid elution with 0.1 M glycine pH 2.5, the pH of the eluates was adjusted to pH 8.0 with 0.5 M Tris. For protein digestion samples were incubated overnight with 2 µg trypsin (Trypsin Gold, Promega, USA) followed by addition of 0.1 µg Lys-C (Roche, Germany) and incubation for additional 6 h. The peptides were desalted on C-18 reversed phase stage tips (Nest Group, USA), dried in vacuum and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Dried peptides mixtures were recovered in 3 µl 30% formic acid and diluted with water to 23 µl. Five µl of the digest were injected on a Nano-LC system (Eksigent425 2D Nano-LC; Sciex, USA) and peptides were separated by reversed phase chromatography on C-18 columns prepared in-house (Reprosil-Pur C18-AQ, 1.9 µm, Dr. Maisch, Germany, PicoFrit Columns, 75 µm i.d., New Obejctive, USA) in a linear gradient of 100% eluent A (0.1% formic acid) to 55% eluent B (60% actenitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in 120 min. The LC-system was setup as vented column and sample was load and desalted at a flow rate of 400 nl/min and separation was carried out at a flow rate of 200 nl/min. The nano-LC system was hyphenated to the mass spectrometer (Q-Exactive HF, ThermoScientific, Germany) which was operated in data-dependent mode. Data interpretation was performed with Mascot V2.2 (Matrixscience, UK) and Progenesis LC–MS V4.1 (Nonlinear Dynamics, UK). Data interpretation was performed with MaxQuant V1.6.1.0 and Perseus V1.6.1.3 (MPI of Biochemistry, Germany).

Coupling assay

Gap junction intracellular communication was tested using a dye coupling assay. Here, the fluorescent dye Calcein-AM (Sigma, 17783) was used. A neural crest population dissected from uninjected embryos was incubated with the dye Calcein-AM for approximately 10 min or until the dye was loaded into all the cells. Another neural crest population from embryos injected with a nuclear marker (nRFP mRNA injections, see above) was dissected separately. After the two populations were dissociated in absence of calcium and magnesium, they were mixed and incubated for 1 h at 14 °C in a test tube. Following mild centrifuge, the neural crest explants were cut in similar size pieces and cultured as described above and then filmed. To test the channel activity of gap junctions, gap junction blockers; meclofenamic acid (Sigma, M4531) and flufenamic acid (Sigma, F9005) were used. Cell communication was assessed by estimating the ratio of number of cells that display both tracers, the nuclear marker and the Calcein to the total number of cells that have the nuclear marker.

Statistical analysis

The estimation of the sample size was done by following previously published work and no specific statistical method was used. Experiments were not randomized and due to the nature of the experiments, the authors were not blinded to allocation during both, experiments and results analysis. Only viable embryos and explants were analyzed. Mis-injected embryos were not included for in situ hybridization experiments. Correct injection was determined by injection of linear tracers. Our experimental parameters were measured at random once viable and properly injected embryos were selected.

Comparison of percentages was performed using contingency tables⁶⁶. Normality of data sets was tested using Kolmogorov–Smirnov’s test, d’Agostino and Pearson’s test and Shapiro–Wilk’s test using Prism6 (GraphPad). Datasets following normal distribution were compared with Student’s t- test (two-tailed, unequal variances) or ANOVA with a Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post-test using Excel or Prism6 (GraphPad). Datasets that did not follow a normal distribution were compared using Mann Whitney’s test or a nonparametric ANOVA (Kruskal Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test) using Excel or Prism6. Cross-comparisons were performed only if the overall p value of the ANOVA was less than 0.05. In all figure legends N = number of independent experiments; n = total sample size.

X. laevis n-cadherin partial promoter identification

To identify the basic promoter of Xenopus n-cad we used the following strategy. The basic promoter region from chick and mammalian n-cadherin genes have been described at the 5′-UTR regions, within the position −3000 to −1 bp respect the translation initiation site^41,67. By using the X. laevis Genome Project resource (https://xenopus.lab.nig.ac.jp/) we identified a region of 2800 bp in the 5′-UTR of the X. laevis n-cadherin gene (Supplementary Fig. 4). Since our data indicate that Cx43Tail, BTF-3, and Pol II form a complex, we use ElemeNT tool⁶⁸ to search for potentially active TATA boxes in the region that we isolated. Our in silico analysis reveal a TATA box rich region between the positions −166 to −618 bp, relative to the translation start site (Supplementary Fig. 4). Finally, we design overlapping primers to amplify fragments of 200 bp across this region. Primers sequences are listed in the ChIP section and their binding regions are highlighted in Supplementary Fig. 4.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)

For chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChiP), we followed a standard procedure for X. laevis embryos^69,70. For each independent experiment we used two technical replicas and 250–300 Xenopus embryos per condition. Briefly, neurula stages X. laevis embryos were fixed for 15 min and 3 μg of Pol II antibody (Diagenode, C15100055) or GFP ChIP grade antibody (Abcam, ab290) were used. For DNA extraction we followed a standard protocol^69,70. Using the ElemeNT analysis resource, we searched for putative TATA boxes in the X. laevis n-cad promoter region (Supplementary Fig. 4). Primers flanking these TATA boxes were designed to analyze ChiP samples by PCR. PCR was performed using the following protocol 95 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 30 s for 32 cycles. Primers used for ChiP-PCR were:

P5F: 5′-CTTCCAAGAGATGAAGCTCATAT-3′,

P5R: 5′- AACACTCTATATGGCAGATAAC-3′,

P6F: 5′-CCTTTAAATGCATACACTTACC-3′,

P6R: 5’-ACAGAAAAAGCATTTGCTTCCT-3′,

P7F: 5′-CAATCAGATCCTTATATGTCCC-3′,

P7R: 5′-GCCAAGTTTTCCCTTTGTTGT-3′,

P8F: 5′-GGAAGCAAATGCTTTTTCTGTC-3′,

P8R: 5′-AGTCTGCTTTAGGAGACAACG-3′

and their relative binding sites are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4b. ChIP experiments were quantified as follow: normalized ratio of band intensity for each condition was averaged it and the fold increase respect the IgG control was calculated and plotted as fold enrichment. Band intensity was registered by using ImageJ Gels analysis plugin. Uncropped gels are shown in Supplementary Fig. 7c, d.

Data availability

All data and custom codes are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD010870

Change history

01 November 2018
The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of the author Alexandra Schambony, which was incorrectly given as Alexandra Schambon. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

References

Aasen, T., Mesnil, M., Naus, C. C., Lampe, P. D. & Laird, D. W. Gap junctions and cancer: communicating for 50 years. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 775–788 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Esseltine, J. L. & Laird, D. W. Next-generation connexin and pannexin cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 944–955 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kardami, E. et al. The role of connexins in controlling cell growth and gene expression. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 94, 245–264 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dang, X., Doble, B. W. & Kardami, E. The carboxy-tail of connexin-43 localizes to the nucleus and inhibits cell growth. Mol. Cell Biochem. 242, 35–38 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Meyer, R. A., Laird, D. W., Revel, J. P. & Johnson, R. G. Inhibition of gap junction and adherens junction assembly by connexin and A-CAM antibodies. J. Cell Biol. 119, 179–189 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jongen, W. M. F. et al. Regulation of connexin 43-mediated gap junctional intercellular communication by Ca2+ in mouse epidermal cells is controlled by E-cadherin. J. Cell. Biol. 114, 545–555 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mayor, R. & Etienne-Manneville, S. The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 97–109 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Friedl, P. & Mayor, R. Tuning collective cell migration by cell–cell junction regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9, a029199 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
Ewart, J. L. et al. Heart and Neural Tube Defects in Transgenic Mice Overexpressing the Cx43 Gap Junction Gene. Development 1292, 1281–1292 (1997).
Huang, G. Y. et al. Alteration in connexin 43 gap junction gene dosage impairs conotruncal heart development. Dev. Biol. 198, 32–44 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mayor, R. & Theveneau, E. The neural crest. Development 140, 2247–2251 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Scarpa, E. et al. Cadherin switch during EMT in neural crest cells leads to contact inhibition of locomotion via repolarization of forces. Dev. Cell 34, 421–434 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barriga, E. H. & Mayor, R. Embryonic cell–cell adhesion: a key player in collective neural crest migration. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 112, 301–323 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Xu, X. Modulation of mouse neural crest cell motility by N-cadherin and connexin 43 gap junctions. J. Cell Biol. 154, 217–230 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Xu, X., Francis, R., Wei, C. J., Linask, K. L. & Lo, C. W. Connexin 43-mediated modulation of polarized cell movement and the directional migration of cardiac neural crest cells. Development 133, 3629–3639 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wei, C. J., Francis, R., Xu, X. & Lo, C. W. Connexin 43 associated with an N-cadherin-containing multiprotein complex is required for gap junction formation in NIH3T3 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 19925–19936 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zheng, X. M., Moncollin, V., Egly, J. M. & Chambon, P. A general transcription factor forms a stable complex with RNA polymerase B (II). Cell 50, 361–368 (1987).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zheng, X. M., Black, D., Chambon, P. & Egly, J. M. Sequencing and expression of complementary DNA for the general transcription factor BTF3. Nature 344, 556–559 (1990).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Wang, C.-J. et al. Clinicopathological significance of BTF3 expression in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 34, 2141–2146 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu, Q. et al. Basic transcription factor 3 is involved in gastric cancer development and progression. World J. Gastroenterol. 19, 449–4503 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhang, D.-Z. et al. Basic transcription factor 3 is required for proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition via regulation of FOXM1 and JAK2/STAT3 signaling in gastric cancer. Oncol. Res. 25, 1453–1462 (2017).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Smyth, J. W. & Shaw, R. M. Autoregulation of connexin 43 gap junction formation by internally translated isoforms. Cell Rep. 5, 611–618 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Salat-Canela, C., Sesé, M., Peula, C., Ramón y Cajal, S. & Aasen, T. Internal translation of the connexin 43 transcript. Cell Commun. Signal. 12, 31 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
Ul-Hussain, M. et al. Internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) activity generates endogenous carboxyl-terminal domains of Cx43 and is responsive to hypoxic conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 20979–20990 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barriga, E. H., Maxwell, P. H., Reyes, A. E. & Mayor, R. The hypoxia factor Hif-1?? controls neural crest chemotaxis and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Biol. 201, 759–776 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Tribulo, C., Aybar, M. J., Nguyen, V. H., Mullins, M. C. & Mayor, R. Regulation of Msx genes by a Bmp gradient is essential for neural crest specification. Development 130, 6441–6452 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gentzel, M., Schille, C., Rauschenberger, V. & Schambony, A. Distinct functionality of dishevelled isoforms on Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2 (CamKII) in Xenopus gastrulation. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 966–977 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kusumawidjaja, G. et al. Basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3) regulates transcription of tumor-associated genes in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 6, 367–376 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cavallini, B. et al. A yeast activity can substitute for the HeLa cell TATA box factor. Nature 334, 77–80 (1988).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Wang, W., Xu, M., Wang, Y. & Jamil, M. Basal transcription factor 3 plays an important role in seed germination and seedling growth of rice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 465739 (2014).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Saka, Y., Hagemann, A. I., Piepenburg, O. & Smith, J. C. Nuclear accumulation of Smad complexes occurs only after the midblastula transition in Xenopus. Development 134, 4209–4218 (2007).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nones, J., Costa, A. P., Leal, R. B., Gomes, F. C. A. & Trentin, A. G. The flavonoids hesperidin and rutin promote neural crest cell survival. Cell Tissue Res. 350, 305–315 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bahm, I. et al. PDGF controls contact inhibition of locomotion by regulating N-cadherin during neural crest migration. Development 144, 2456–2468 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Giepmans, B. N. G. Role of Connexin 43-Interacting Proteins at Gap Junctions. Adv. Cardiol. 42, 41–56 (2006).
Gupta, N. et al. Inhibition of glioma cell growth and tumorigenic potential by CCN3 (NOV). Mol. Pathol. 54, 293–299 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fu, C. T., Bechberger, J. F., Ozog, M. A., Perbal, B. & Naus, C. C. CCN3 (NOV) interacts with connexin 43 in C6 glioma cells: possible mechanism of connexin-mediated growth suppression. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36943–36950 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Takamatsu, T., Regulation, C. & Prefectural, K. Cx43 mediates TGF-beta signaling through competitive smads binding to microtubules. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2264–2273 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Cheung, M. et al. The transcriptional control of trunk neural crest induction, survival, and delamination. Dev. Cell 8, 179–192 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Matsumata, M., Uchikawa, M., Kamachi, Y. & Kondoh, H. Multiple N-cadherin enhancers identified by systematic functional screening indicate its Group B1 SOX-dependent regulation in neural and placodal development. Dev. Biol. 286, 601–617 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sauka-Spengler, T. & Bronner-Fraser, M. A gene regulatory network orchestrates neural crest formation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 557–568 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Li, B., Paradies, N. E. & Brackenbury, R. W. Isolation and characterization of the promoter region of the chicken N-cadherin gene. Gene 191, 7–13 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Theveneau, E. & Mayor, R. Cadherins in collective cell migration of mesenchymal cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 677–684 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
De Boer, T. P. et al. Connexin 43 repression following epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition in embryonal carcinoma cells requires Snail1 transcription factor. Differentiation 75, 208–218 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
Miyoshi, A. et al. Snail accelerates cancer invasion by upregulating MMP expression and is associated with poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 92, 252–258 (2005).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Steventon, B., Araya, C., Linker, C., Kuriyama, S. & Mayor, R. Differential requirements of BMP and Wnt signalling during gastrulation and neurulation define two steps in neural crest induction. Development 136, 771–779 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Newport, J. & Kirschner, M. A major developmental transition in early xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30, 675–686 (1982).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nieuwkoop, P. D. & Faber, J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development From the Fertilized Egg Till the End of Metamorphosis 2nd Edn (North-Holland Publishing Co., North-Holland, 1967).
Aybar, M. J., Nieto, M. A. & Mayor, R. Snail precedes slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the Xenopus neural crest. Development 130, 483–494 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Fawcett, S. R. & Klymkowsky, M. W. Embryonic expression of Xenopus laevis SOX7. Gene Expr. Patterns 4, 29–33 (2004).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Harland, R. In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 36, 685–695 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Mayor, R., Morgan, R. & Sargent, M. G. Induction of the prospective neural crest of Xenopus. Development 121, 767–777 (1995).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hopwood, N. D., Pluck, A. & Gurdon, J. B. A Xenopus mRNA related to Drosophila twist is expressed in response to induction in the mesoderm and the neural crest. Cell 59, 893–903 (1989).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Theveneau, E. et al. Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev. Cell 19, 39–53 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Moore, R. et al. Par3 controls neural crest migration by promoting microtubule catastrophe during contact inhibition of locomotion. Development 140, 4763–4775 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dent, J. A., Polson, A. G. & Klymkowsky, M. W. A whole-mount immunocytochemical analysis of the expression of the intermediate filament protein vimentin in Xenopus. Development 105, 61–74 (1989).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chakrabarti, A., Matthews, G., Colman, A. & Dale, L. Secretory and inductive properties of Drosophila wingless protein in Xenopus oocytes and embryos. Development 115, 355–369 (1992).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Calisto, J., Araya, C., Marchant, L., Riaz, C. F. & Mayor, R. Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration. Development 132, 2587–2597 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Alfandari, D., Cousin, H., Gaultier, A., Hoffstrom, B. G. & DeSimone, D. W. Integrin α5β1 supports the migration of Xenopus cranial neural crest on fibronectin. Dev. Biol. 260, 449–464 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Borchers, a, Epperlein, H. H. & Wedlich, D. An assay system to study migratory behavior of cranial neural crest cells in Xenopus. Dev. Genes Evol. 210, 217–222 (2000).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Carmona-Fontaine, C. et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 456, 957–961 (2008).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Theveneau, E. & Mayor, R. Beads on the run: beads as alternative tools for chemotaxis assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 769, 449–460 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Nandadasa, S., Tao, Q., Menon, N. R., Heasman, J. & Wylie, C. N- and E-cadherins in Xenopus are specifically required in the neural and nonneural ectoderm, respectively, for F-actin assembly and morphogenetic movements. Development 136, 1327–1338 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Stout, R. F. Jr, Snapp, E. L. & Spray, D. C. Connexin type and fluorescent protein-fusion tag determine structural stability of gap junction plaques. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 23497–23514 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dimauro, I., Pearson, T., Caporossi, D. & Jackson, M. J. A simple protocol for the subcellular fractionation of skeletal muscle cells and tissue. BMC Res. Notes 5, 513 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kushima, S., Mammadova, G., Mahbub Hasan, A. K. M., Fukami, Y. & Sato, K. Characterization of lipovitellin 2 as a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in oocytes, eggs and early embryos of Xenopus laevis. Zool. Sci. 28, 550–559 (2011).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Taillard, É. D., Waelti, P. & Zuber, J. Few statistical tests for proportions comparison. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185, 1336–1350 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
Le Mée, S., Fromigué, O. & Marie, P. J. Sp1/Sp3 and the myeloid zinc finger gene MZF1 regulate the human N-cadherin promoter in osteoblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 302, 129–142 (2005).
Article Google Scholar
Sloutskin, A. et al. ElemeNT: a computational tool for detecting core promoter elements. Transcription 6, 41–50 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gentsch, G. E., and Smith, J. C. Investigating physical chromatin associations across the Xenopus genome by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 70, 483–497 (2014).
Akkers, R. C., Jacobi, U. G. & Veenstra, G. J. C. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of Xenopus embryos. Methods Mol. Biol. 917, 279–292 (2012).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Streit (King’s College London) for comments on the manuscript, J. Smith (Crick’s Institute) for providing us with the BiFc vectors, D. Becker (University College London) for help in the initial experiments on connexins, Chiara Mencarelli for help with the Hela cells siRNA experiments, Anja Bosserhoff and Tobia Pukrop for providing human cancer cell lines, Sabrina Krenn for help with cell culture and Xenopus experiments, and Bill Andrews (UCL) for helping with some cloning. This study was supported by grants from MRC (J000655 and M010465), BBSRC (M008517) and Wellcome Trust (084247/Z/07/Z) to R.M. and from D.F.G. (SCHA965/9-1 and SCHA965/6-2) to A.S. M.K. was supported by a Latsis Postgraduate Scholarship, a DAAD short-term research grant and travel grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Funds and the Company of Biologists. E.H.B. was supported by fellowships from EMBO (LTF-971) and Marie Skłodowska Curie program (IF-2014_ST 658536). Supplement contains additional data.

Author information

Marc Gentzel
Present address: Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Facility Molecular Analysis/Mass Spectrometry, TU Dresden, Tatzberg 47/49, 01307, Dresden, Germany
These authors contributed equally: Maria Kotini, Elias H. Barriga.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
Maria Kotini, Elias H. Barriga, Jonathan Leslie & Roberto Mayor
London Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London, WC1H 0AH, UK
Elias H. Barriga
Max Planck Institut for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstr. 108, 01307, Dresden, Germany
Marc Gentzel
Biology Department, Developmental Biology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, 91058, Germany
Verena Rauschenberger & Alexandra Schambony

Authors

Maria Kotini
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elias H. Barriga
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jonathan Leslie
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marc Gentzel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Verena Rauschenberger
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Alexandra Schambony
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roberto Mayor
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.K., E.H.B. and R.M. conceived the project. M.K. and E.H.B. performed and analyzed most of the experiments. J.L. helped with some cloning. M.G. and M.K. performed the Mass Spec experiments. V.R., A.S. and E.H.B. performed the experiments with mammalian cells. M.K., E.H.B. and R.M. wrote the manuscript. All the authors edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Mayor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotini, M., Barriga, E.H., Leslie, J. et al. Gap junction protein Connexin-43 is a direct transcriptional regulator of N-cadherin in vivo. Nat Commun 9, 3846 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06368-x

Download citation

Received: 05 March 2018
Accepted: 29 August 2018
Published: 21 September 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06368-x

This article is cited by

Simulation of gap junction formation reveals critical role of Cys disulfide redox state in connexin hemichannel docking
- László Héja
- Ágnes Simon
- Julianna Kardos
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
Robo4 inhibits gamma radiation-induced permeability of a murine microvascular endothelial cell by regulating the junctions
- Seyram Yao Adzraku
- Guozhang Wang
- Lingyu Zeng
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2023)
Circulating macrophages as the mechanistic link between mosaic loss of Y-chromosome and cardiac disease
- Xuehong Xu
- Rong Zhou
- MengMeng Xu
Cell & Bioscience (2023)
Structural insights into regulation of CCN protein activities and functions
- Vivi Talstad Monsen
- Håvard Attramadal
Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling (2023)
Connexin 32 overexpression increases proliferation, reduces gap junctional intercellular communication, motility and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in Hs578T breast cancer cells
- Deniz Ugur
- Taha Bugra Gungul
- Gulistan Mese
Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.