An ultra-low thiourea catalyzed strain-release glycosylation and a multicatalytic diversification strategy


The utility of thiourea catalysis in selective glycosylation strategies has gained significant momentum lately due to its versatility in hydrogen bonding or anionic recognition activation modes. The use of these non-covalent interactions constitute a powerful means to construct glycosidic linkages as it mimics physiologically occurring glycosyltransferases. However, glycosyl donor activation through the currently employed catalysts is moderate such that, in general, catalyst loadings are rather high in these transformations. In addition, thiourea catalysis has not been well explored for the synthesis of furanosides. Herein, we demonstrate an ultra-low loadings stereoselective and stereospecific thiourea catalyzed strain-release furanosylation and pyranosylation strategy. Our ultra-low organocatalyzed furanosylation enables a multicatalytic strategy, which opens up a unique avenue towards rapid diversification of synthetic glycosides. In-situ NMR monitoring unravel insights into unknown reaction intermediates and initial rate kinetic studies reveal a plausible synergistic hydrogen bonding/Brønsted acid activation mode.


Carbohydrates are among the most prevalent biomolecules that spans a wide spectrum of physiological processes including cellular respiration, cell-cell interaction and adhesion1,2, in modulating transcription and complex signal transduction cascades3, inflammation and post-translational modifications4. Carbohydrates are also pivotal in modulating pathways crucial in cancer research5,6. Interestingly, the transfer of nature’s catalytic ingenuity in the utility of non-covalent interactions in enzymes such as glycosyltransferases into the synthesis lab7, to construct a plethora of O, N, C, and S glycosides has proven to be challenging8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Very recently, large attention has been given to hydrogen-bonding catalyzed glycosylations especially in thiourea catalysis which provides a miniaturized organocatalyst mimic to glycosyltransferases16,17. Thiourea catalysis uniquely leverages mild and highly directional non-covalent hydrogen bonding or anionic recognition interactions to effectively construct mainly O- and to a smaller extent S-glycosidic linkages on pyranoses18.

The first demonstration of a thiourea catalyzed glycosylation was elegantly reported by Galan and McGarrigle et. al. in 2012, where D-Galactal derivatives functionalized by a wide range of protecting groups were converted to 2-deoxyglycosides selectively (Fig. 1a) by the employment of the Schreiner’s thiourea catalyst 419,20,21. The interest in this activation mode was later picked up by Schmidt et. al. in 2013 (Fig. 1b), where 4 was effective as a co-catalyst in the presence of a phosphoric acid catalyst 8 in glycosylations utilizing Schmidt’s trichloroacetimidate donors22. While the thiourea itself does not catalyse the glycosylation, it is critical in accelerating the reaction, improving the yields and α/β selectivities. This cooperativity effect was utilized by Galan et al. in 2017, where the substrate scope of the glycal addition was expanded towards D-Glucal and L-Rhamnal derivatives when thiourea 4 was used in conjunction with an axial chiral BINOL based phosphoric acid catalyst23. Galan et al., Yoshida and Takao et al., as well as Schmidt et al. contributed to thiourea catalyzed O and S-glycosylation of 2-nitroglycals24,25,26. In 2016, Toshima et al. reported a photoinduced glycosylation by the utility of Schreiner’s thiourea catalyst 4 (30 mol%) as an organophotoacid on a Schmidt’s trichloroacetimidate donor (Fig. 1c)27.

Fig. 1

Representative precedents in thiourea catalyzed pyranosylations. a Thiourea catalyzed access of 2-deoxyglycosides. b Co-catalysis of phosphoric acid and thiourea on trichloroacetimidate donors. c Concentration dependent thiourea catalyzed photoinduced catalysis. d Urea catalyzed Koenigs–Knorr glycosylation. e Macrocyclic thiourea catalyzed stereospecific Koenigs–Knorr glycosylation. f Our reported methodology of an ultra-low thiourea catalyzed strain-release glycosylation and a one-pot multicatalytic diversification strategy

Another significant breakthrough was reported by Ye et al. in 2016, where the first Koenigs–Knorr glycosylation catalyzed by a hydrogen-bonding urea catalyst (20 mol%) was demonstrated (Fig. 1d), and a marked α/β selectivity improvement was observed upon addition of a phosphine on glucose derived donors28. Jacobsen disclosed in 2017 a powerful example utilizing a specially designed macrocyclic bis-thiourea catalyst 18 (5 mol%) to stereospecifically catalyse the Koenigs–Knorr glycosylation of glycosyl-chlorides (Fig. 1e), and demonstrated effectively the access of cis-1,2, trans-1,2-, and 2-deoxy-β-glycosidic linkages29. Noteworthy is also the recent spike in the utility of chiral phosphoric acid catalysis in stereoselective glycosylations30,31,32.

While great strides in thiourea catalysis are exemplified in the above mentioned reports, considerable challenges still remain in the employment of thiourea/urea catalysis on a broader scale in carbohydrate chemistry. The glycosyl donors employed in thiourea catalysis have remained in the pyranose realm and thiourea catalysis is rarely known to effectively catalyse glycosylations with donors bearing the furanose scaffold33,34,35,36. In fact, effective furanosylation protocols are scarce in catalysis34,35,36. This is a fundamental synthetic gap since furanosides are highly prevalent in nature and are ubiquitous in the ribose-phosphate backbones of nucleic acids such as DNA, RNA, and signaling molecules such as ATP. Furanosides are also important components in the cell-wall biosynthesis of pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis37,38,39,40. In addition, both (D)- and (L)- furanonucleoside motifs have found utility in anti-viral therapeutics41. Hence, effective furanosylation at ultra-low catalyst loadings will be a significant step towards accessing furanoside derivatives efficiently. Moreover, another unsolved challenge lies in the plausibility of thioureas to catalyze N- and C-glycosylations, an important transformation to access nucleoside analogs.

Herein, we describe a highly selective and stereospecific ultra-low thiourea catalyzed strain-release furanosylation that enables O, N, S, and C-glycosylations on a unique class of strained derivatized furanosyl donors (Fig. 1f)42,43,44,45,46. A low thiourea catalyzed strain-release O and N-pyranosylation is also demonstrated. Significantly, by incorporating multicatalysis and alkyne-azide cycloaddition (AAC) or CLICK chemistry into our furanosylation protocol47,48,49, a sugar diversification concept is developed. This opens up a general path to access synthetic glycosides bearing varying donor structure, linker length, biological warheads, and molecular shapes with potential biological utility. Deeper NMR investigations of the reaction profile and initial rate kinetics studies also shed light into the mechanism of the strain-release glycosylation.


Optimization of strain-release glycosylation

This investigation was initiated by utilizing a (D)-furanoxylose, (D)-Xylf derived strained glycosyl donor 19a and a (D)-Galactose derived acceptor 21a as the model furanosylation reaction (Table 1)50,51,52. We hypothesize that utilizing such cyclopropane fused furanosides might provide an advantage in activating the furanosyl donor via thermodynamic strain release, and the ketone functionality provides a functional handle for thiourea to activate via bidendate hydrogen bonding. Initial screening of various thiourea, urea, and squaramide catalysts (Entry 1–5, Table 1) revealed the superiority of the Kass catalyst A53. This recently reported charge enhanced thiourea not yet employed in glycosylations gave 77% yields and a very high α/β ratio at 5% catalyst loadings at RT. The effect of different solvents was probed (see Supplementary Table 1) and the solvent screen revealed that fluorobenzene is optimal.

Table 1 Representative reaction optimization and screening

With promising results in hand, we further studied the temperature effect (see Supplementary Table 1), reducing the temperature to 0 °C almost completely stopped the reaction, however, an increase in temperature to 50–70 °C gave almost quantitative yields with very high α/β ratios. To our delight, reduction to 1 mol% of the charged enhanced thiourea A gave quantitative yields preserving the α/β ratios. The optimal conditions were achieved when we reduced the catalyst loadings to 0.2 mol%. A further control experiment at the exact reaction conditions in the absence of catalyst A showed negligible conversion.

To deepen our understanding of the nature of catalysis by A, since pyridinium salts are known to also catalyse alcohol addition to glycals54, catalyst F, the charged bis-fragment of catalyst A, was synthesized, and subjected (0.4 mol%, Entry 8, Table 1) to the reaction mixture, which yielded negligible product. This control experiment revealed the criticality of the thiourea component in this methodology. We also tried the Schreiner thiourea D in similar conditions (Entry 9, Table 1) as our conditions in catalyst A. A slightly lower yield of 86% is obtained with slightly elevated α/β ratios of 97:3, which provided a good alternative protocol in our subsequent investigation to accommodate a wider variety of substrates.

Substrate scope of strain-release furanosylation

With an optimized furanosylation protocol in hand, we further proceeded to expand the substrate scope of this ultra-low loadings thiourea catalyzed reaction.

Our investigation revealed that the O-glycosylation proceeded with good to excellent anomeric selectivity. This protocol tolerates glycosyl donors such as (D,L)-furanoxylose, (D)-Xylf derived 19a, (L)-Xylf derived ent-19a and (D)-furanoarabinose, (D)-Araf derived 19b. We discovered in our investigation that the anomeric selectivity was highly stereospecific29. When 19a or ent-19a were employed, anomeric selectivity was consistently biased towards the α-anomer. When 19b was utilized, the major anomer obtained was the β-anomer.

The anomeric preference observed pointed strongly towards a mechanism that proceed via anchimeric assistance from the C2- ketone moiety. Moreover, we were delighted with the broad range of O-acceptors that were tolerated which include various protected monosaccharides containing unprotected hydroxyl groups in varying positions (Table 2). Even monosaccharides bearing two unprotected alcohols showed excellent regioselectivity on the less sterically hindered primary alcohol with complete α-selectivity to form 20d. We also demonstrated a rare furanosylation on an anomeric C1-hydroxyl acceptor which proceeded with diminished yields to give 20e. Other biologically relevant acceptors such as protected amino-acid derivatives of (L)-Serine and (L)-Threonine showed excellent reactivity to generate 20l and 20m, which would potentially open up interesting avenues in glycopeptide research. Lipids such as cholesterol and testosterone bearing hydroxyls in different positions also proceeded smoothly, generating glycolipid type derivatives 20p-20s that has applications in glycolipids as well as cardiac glycoside research55.

Table 2 O-Furanosylation substrate scope using sub-molar catalyst loadings

Significantly, we extended our O-glycosylation methodology to include a multitude of alcohols with important functional handles. The tolerable range of these alcohols spans from sterically less hindered primary alcohols, including allyl alcohols, propargyl alcohols, and azido containing alcohols, which opens up numerous opportunities to incorporate CLICK chemistry for our proposed multicatalytic diversification49, and allows facile tethering of various structural motifs via multicatalysis. Interestingly, sterically more hindered secondary alcohol acceptors such as L-menthol, 2-adamantanol as well as highly hindered tertiary alcohols like 1-adamantanol proceeded smoothly in this protocol, generating O-furanosides 20w-20y with good to excellent anomeric selectivities. Utility of p-bromo-benzylalcohol as an O-acceptor allows access of 20n, which facilities further transformation using Pd-catalysis on the C-Br functionality. Hydroxylamine, a rarely utilized acceptor can also be used in this protocol to generate 20o56. There is an exceptional case where bicyclic 20k is obtained instead of a direct attack on the anomeric carbon, when donor 19b is used. It is postulated that the unusual regioselectivity observed might be due to a dual steric clash effect of a congested anomeric carbon due to the anchimeric effect of the C2 ketone and a bulky acceptor, which then allowed preferential attack on the less congested distal ketone, (See Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Discussion 1).

Furthermore, we probed the limits of our methodology by investigating S-furanosylation and N-furanosylation (Table 3), two important yet understudied aspects in catalytic glycosylations. The N-glycosylation study revealed that our protocol works excellently with bicyclic heterocyclic N-acceptors, generating the majority of N-glycosides 20aa-ah with complete anomeric selectivity except for 20ag (Table 3). The N-acceptors tolerable in this protocol include derivatized purines and pyrimidines, as well as other structurally similar mimetics of purines, such as benzotriazoles and indolines. We also demonstrated that S-furanosylation works well to generate protected cysteine derivatives 20ak and thiophenol analogs 20ai, 20aj, and 20al, providing excellent anomeric selectivity on (L,D)-Xylf and (D)-Araf derived donors.

Table 3 N, S, C -Furanosylation substrate scope

Significantly, expanding our concept into S-furanosylation opens up potential opportunities for cysteine glycol-tagging in proteins, especially with recent discovery of S-glycosylation also as a vital post-translational modification57,58. The isolation of a by-product 20al-side further augments the intermediacy of C2-anchimeric assistance in the reaction mechanism. While the search for a suitable acceptor in the C-furanosylation was extremely challenging, we managed to obtain a rare case of a Friedel–Crafts-type C-furanoside by subjecting 1,3,5-trimethoxylbenzene to our reaction conditions, which generates the corresponding C-glycosides 20am-ao with good yields and selectivity. Other less reactive C-nucleophiles, such as mesitylene, 1,3-dimethylbenzene, 3-cyanocoumarin, and anthracene gave no observable product (See Supplementary Note 4).

Substrate scope of strain-release pyranosylation

In addition, we were curious to understand the wider applicability of our thiourea catalyzed protocol in strain-release pyranosylations (Table 4). Initial optimizations on our strained pyranosyl donor revealed subtleties in reaction conditions distinct from furanosylation which we needed to take into account (see Supplementary Table 2).

Table 4 O, N-Pyranosylation substrate scope

While the pyranosylation reaction was still rather facile which proceeded well at room temperature (RT), we needed to increase the catalyst loadings to 1% possibly due to the increased donor stability as a result of ring strain relief in six-membered ring containing substrates 22a-c. A range of pyransoyl donors 22a-22c with varying stereogenic information and protecting groups were well tolerated (Table 4). Moreover, different O and N-acceptors were found to be suitable for this methodology, generally providing the β-anomer of 23 stereoselectively and stereospecifically.

When di-O-isopropylidene-α-D-glucofuranose was used as the glycosyl acceptor, bicyclic product 23e (Table 4) was generated analogous to the formation of 20k from arabinose derived furanoside donor 19b (Table 2). We postulate that the trans relative stereochemistry between C1 and C5 of the pyranoside and furanoside donors 22a-c and 19b seems to be the key contributory factor to the observed distal regioselectivity to ease steric congestion, which is rendered more pronounced by such bulky acceptors (See Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary Discussion 1).

Mechanistic studies and control experiments

In order to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanistic intricacies of the thiourea catalyzed strain-release furanosylation, NMR monitoring of the reaction progress and preliminary initial rate kinetic studies were conducted. In-situ NMR monitoring of the reaction revealed an unexpected finding (Fig. 2a and see Supplementary Figure 6).

Fig. 2

Mechanistic and kinetic studies. a In-situ NMR monitoring of strain-release furanosylation of 19a at RT. b Initial rate kinetic studies of strain-release furanosylation. c Proposed mechanistic model of the strain-release furanosylation. d Sequential addition control experiments to verify 27b

Two different intermediates 27a and 27b detected during the RT in-situ studies appear to be responsible for the strain-release furanosylation. As 27a and 27b are both non-isolable intermediates, the postulated structures drawn (Fig. 2a) are based on in-situ 1H, 13C, COSY, HSQC elucidation from the reaction mixture (see Supplementary Figure 1215 and Supplementary Note 4).

In the reaction monitoring profile at RT (Fig. 2a and see Supplementary Figure 6), there was almost rapid disappearance of donor 19a in less than 5 min into the reaction, which also corresponded to the rapid formation of product 20a. Concomitantly, we noticed the depletion of the short lived transient intermediate 27a in the initial rapid phase till ~9 min into the reaction. 27a seems to be responsible for the steep increase in 20a formation till almost 75% conversion at 9 min, where intermediate 27a completely disappeared.

After the initial rapid phase, there is a more gradual formation of 20a and depletion of a second non-isolable intermediate 27b at a similar gradual rate (Fig. 2a and see Supplementary Figure 6).

The bulk of the obtained product 20a (till 83% conversion) is postulated to arise from intermediate 27a and 27b. It must also be mentioned that trace amounts of transient unidentifiable intermediates bearing doublets in the 5.30–5.85 ppm range were detected (See Supplementary Figure 8, 9), but their identities could not be determined from the crude NMR mixture.

Moreover, to better understand the effect of the strained glycosyl acceptor, the glycosyl donor, as well as the catalyst on the rate determining step, initial rate kinetics were performed by varying the concentration of each of the above mentioned reagents and monitoring the reaction using 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 2b and see Supplementary Figure 10).

Our preliminary kinetic studies revealed that modifying the concentrations in each of these three reagents had a corresponding initial rate effect, with the initial rate (slope at t = 0) increasing with increasing reagent concentration. Further deriving the slope of the ln rate vs the ln concentration plots (See Supplementary Figure 11) revealed a first order kinetics dependence for acceptor 19a, as well as donor 21a. Interestingly, we arrived at a fractional order kinetics dependence for catalyst A. These early studies are also indicative of a termolecular mechanism in the rate determining step, which suggest a close interplay between hydrogen bonding and Brønsted acid mechanisms in the catalytic cycle.

We propose according to these results a concomitant hydrogen bond activation of the alcohol oxygen on the acceptor by the thiourea catalyst, which then weakens the O-H bond, resulting in a subsequent relay of the acidic alcohol proton towards carbonyl activation of 19a in the rate determining step (Fig. 2c)19. The interplay between hydrogen bonds and proton shuttling is also indicative of the biomimetic nature of the thiourea mechanism similar to glycosyltransferases, whereby acidic amino acid side chains and hydrogen bonding in the active enzyme pocket play pivotal roles in glycosylation18.

Additionally, a series of control experiments (See Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Discussion 2) using various bidentate hydrogen-bonding catalysts on the strain-release furanosylation such as thioureas and squaramides were conducted to further understand the cruciality of the bidentate hydrogen bond alignment in the methodology, since hydrogen bonds are directional. We also attempted thiourea derivatives with hydrogen bond alignments distorted from the conventional bidentate mode to access monodentate hydrogen-bonding catalysts, by either protecting one thiourea N-H with a methyl group or by utilizing 2-thiouracil, which constraints the two thiourea N-H in a cyclic system, hence precluding a bidentate hydrogen bond activation. These studies demonstrated that both bidentate and monodentate hydrogen-bonding thiourea catalysts can catalyze the strain-release furanosylation, although the bidentate congeners provided superior yields, further augmenting the participation of hydrogen-bonding activation in the mechanism.

Non-hydrogen-bonding-based Brønsted acids with slightly higher and lower pKa compared to the Schreiner’s thiourea (pKa = 8.4 in DMSO), such as triethylammonium chloride (pKa = 9.0 in DMSO) and meldrum acid (pKa = 7.3 in DMSO) were also conducted as orthogonal experiments to probe acidic effects19. In both cases, the reaction yields were inferior to the Schreiner’s thiourea, which provides another evidence that while Brønsted acidity might play a role in the mechanism, solely drawing upon Brønsted acidic explanations might be insufficient to describe the intricate synergism between hydrogen bonding and Brønsted acid mechanism we propose in this methodology59.

An additional control experiment was also conducted by simply first adding catalyst A to 19a without addition of acceptor 21a in an NMR tube, we noticed that after 8 h at RT, 27b was formed with 49% NMR yield (Fig. 2d). No 27a could be detected without addition of acceptor 21a, further proving the cruciality of the acceptor for the major pathway to occur (Fig. 2c). The sequential addition of acceptor 21a subsequently gave 20a in 92% NMR yield, confirming that while product formation in our protocol through 27b via a step-wise reaction is the minor route, it is also viable en route to 20a.

One-pot multicatalytic diversification

With a facile and effective furanosylation protocol in hand, our protocol can be extended into a tractable multicatalysis concept for diversification (Table 5)60, which allows rapid generation of diversified synthetic carbohydrates with varying sugar donors, acceptors, and linker length.

Table 5 Scope of one-pot multicatalytic diversification

We sought to introduce stereochemical and morphological diversity in our synthesized glycosides by tapping upon various carbohydrate donors present in the chiral pool, such as (L,D)-Xylf and (D)-Araf derived donors. By coupling the strained donor unit 19 with an O-acceptor bearing alkyne or azide alcohols 21 with varying carbon chain (n = 0, 1, 2), a pool of O-glycosides functionalized with a CLICK handle (alkyne or azide) with multiple linker length can be generated (Table 5). Without isolating the O-glycoside in the linker pool, our developed furanosylation protocol is compatible with a one-pot second catalytic step where two diversification parameters can be permutated through the sequential CLICK reaction. Firstly, acceptors bearing an azido or alkyne functional group provides a direct mean to incorporate various moieties of biological interest which include either carbohydrates or biologically active motifs such as isatins and coumarins. Secondly, by orthogonally selecting a Cu(II) catalyzed CLICK or a Ru(II) catalyzed CLICK, differential regioselectivities was exploited to generate either a linear-shaped disaccharide or a bent disaccharide (Table 5)61,62, paving the way to access oligosaccharides with different molecular morphologies. A representative scope 25–26 of accessible disaccharides by diastereomeric (sugar donor) or regioisomeric (CLICK) permutations via this multicatalytic strategy is demonstrated in Table 5. An analogous strategy was also demonstrated by azido containing acceptors, which allowed us to access analogs containing a reversed triazole and introducing biological warheads, such as isatin 25d or coumarin 25e. Additionally, CLICK functionalized triazole derivatives of carbohydrates are also known to be potent inhibitors of α-glucosidases, further augmenting the biological potential of the multicatalytically generated compounds63.

Gram scale synthesis and further derivatizations

To demonstrate the scalability of our protocol, we performed a gram scale strain-release furanosylation at a reduced loading of 0.05 mol% (Fig. 3a). To our delight, the upscaled reaction proceeded smoothly to yield 75% of 20a with slight increase in anomeric selectivity (α:β 95:5). A further attempted hydrogenolysis of the benzyl protecting groups gave a surprising result, the deprotected hydroxyl groups underwent a hemiketalization/ketalization cascade (Fig. 3b and see Supplementary Figure 5) to form an architecturally complex caged ketal 28 with 86% yield. The availability of the functional C2-ketone was advantageous for the attachment of a biotin label via hydrazone formation to yield 66% of 29 (Fig. 3b), a known useful strategy that has been employed in chemoenzymatic labeling approaches in pyranose based probes64,65. By exploiting the C-Br bond in glycoside derivatives such as 20n, we are able to employ facile Pd-catalyzed Suzuki coupling to form 31 quantitatively (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, a facile one-pot multicatalytic synthesis was achieved by combining our strain-release glycosylation with a Cu-catalyzed non-CLICK [3 + 2]-cycloaddition of alkynes with o-iodotosylanilines to generate a C2- indole glycoside 32 (Fig. 3d) which opens up a route towards related indolyl-glycosides with anti-cancer activities66,67.

Fig. 3

Further derivatizations. a Gram scale reaction. b Hemiketalization/ketalization cascade and biotinylated hydrazone formation. c Suzuki coupling to access 31. d One-pot multicatalytic strain-release glycosylation/[3 + 2]-cycloaddition sequence


We report a highly efficient extremely low loading thiourea catalyzed stereoselective strain-release furanosylation strategy, which accommodates a wide variety of O, N, S, and C-acceptors. We also demonstrated that this protocol is also extendable towards O and N-strain-release pyranosylations. In-situ NMR monitoring and in-situ characterization of non-isolable transient intermediates also provided deeper mechanistic insights into the intricacies of hydrogen bonding and proton shuttling of thiourea catalyzed strain-release glycosylations. Preliminary initial rate kinetics study provided insightful understanding of the possible termolecular nature of the strain-release furanosylation in the rate determining step. A one-pot multicatalytic diversification concept is also introduced, which merges thiourea catalysis and CLICK chemistry to expedite the access of diverse synthetic furanosides with varying linker length, molecular shape, and biological warheads. We envision that our unique demonstration of a multicatalytic diversity concept paves the way as a general diversification strategy in other catalytic glycosylation protocols. Further investigation into the biological activities of these compounds are currently underway.


General techniques

Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were set up under inert atmosphere (argon) utilizing glassware that were oven dried and cooled under argon purging. Silica Gel Flash Column Chromatography was performed on deactivated Silica gel Merck 60 (particle size 40–63 μm) (Triethylamine (5% v/v) was used as the deactivating reagent). Starting materials were purchased directly from commercial suppliers (Sigma Aldrich, Acros, Alfa Aesar, VWR) and used without further purifications unless otherwise stated. All solvents were dried according to standard procedures or brought from commercial suppliers. Reaction solvent (Fluorobenzene) was stored over activated 3Ǻ molecule sieves. Reactions were monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on Merck silica gel aluminum plates with F254 indicator. Visualization of the developed plates was performed under UV light (254 nm) or KMnO4 stain or H2SO4-EtOH (10% H2SO4 v/v). Dry loading was performed on Silica gel 9 due to observed product decomposition on normal silica gel.

NMR characterization data (1H NMR, 13C NMR and 2D spectra) were collected at 300 K on a Bruker DRX400 (400 MHz), Bruker DRX500 (500 MHz), INOVA500 (500 MHz), and Bruker DRX700 (700 MHz) using acetone-d6, CD2Cl2 or CDCl3 as solvent. Data for 1H NMR are reported as follows: chemical shift (δ ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, br = broad), coupling constant (Hz), integration with the solvent resonance as internal standard (acetone-d6: δ = 2.05 ppm for 1H, δ = 29.92 ppm for 13C; CD2Cl2: δ = 5.32 ppm for 1H, δ = 54.00 ppm for 13C; CDCl3: δ = 7.26 ppm for 1H, δ = 77.16 ppm for 13C).

High resolution mass spectra were recorded on a LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to an Accela HPLC-System (HPLC column: Hypersyl GOLD, 50 mm × 1 mm, particle size 1.9 μm, ionization method: electron spray ionization). Optical rotations were measured in a Schmidt + Haensch Polartronic HH8 polarimeter equipped with a sodium lamp source (589 nm), and are reported as follows: [α]D T °C (c= g/100 mL, solvent). Melting point ranges were taken from solids which were obtained from the solvents as indicated. They were determined on a BÜCHI Melting Point B-540 Apparatus. The microwave reaction was conducted on the Discover SP-Microwave Synthesizer and 10 mL tube with a proper cap was used.

The ratio of anomers was determined by 1H-NMR and HSQC analysis of the crude reaction mixture via integration of characteristic signals of the anomeric proton in the 1H NMR spectra. Chemical yields refer to isolated substances after flash column chromatography, combined yield of both anomers reported. NMR yields were determined using dibromomethane or 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.

General procedure for thiourea catalyzed furanosylation

An oven dried tube with a stirrer bar was charged with strained cyclopropanated furanoside 19a, ent-19a, or 19b (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and glycosyl acceptor 21 (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). Then the tube was purged with argon and sealed with a rubber stopper. After that, anhydrous fluorobenzene (1.1 mL) and a solution of catalyst A (100 µL, 4 mM, 0.002 equiv., freshly prepared) was added. The tube was further sealed with parafilm and immersed in a preheated 50 °C oil bath for 16 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was subsequently dry loaded onto silica 9 and subjected to flash column chromatography with deactivated silica gel for purification to yield 20.

General procedure for thiourea catalyzed pyranosylation

An oven dried tube with a stirrer bar was charged with strained cyclopropane pyranoside 22 (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.), glycosyl acceptor 21 (0.2 mmol, 2 equiv.), catalyst A (1 mol%). Then the tube was purged with argon. Subsequently, anhydrous fluorobenzene (1 mL) was added to the tube under argon, subsequently the tube was sealed with parafilm and stirred at RT for 12 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was subsequently dry loaded onto silica 9 and subjected to flash column chromatography with deactivated silica gel for purification.

General procedure for multicatalytic diversification

An oven dried tube with a stirrer bar was charged with strained cyclopropanated furanoside 19a, ent-19a, 19b (70.5 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and glycosyl acceptor (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.). Then the tube was purged with argon and sealed with a rubber stopper. After that, anhydrous fluorobenzene (1.1 mL) and a solution of catalyst A (100 μL, 4 mM) was added. The tube was further sealed with parafilm and immersed in a preheated 50 °C oil bath for 16 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give a residue. Then Cp*RuCl(PPh3)2 (5 mol%) was added to the residue. The tube was purged with argon and added with azide (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) toluene (2.0 mL) solution, and sealed and heated at 80 °C for 4 h. The mixture was absorbed onto silica 9 and purified by silica gel column chromatography (dry loading).

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information Files. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Dwek, R. A. Glycobiology: toward understanding the function of sugars. Chem. Rev. 96, 683–720 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zachara, N. E. & Hart, G. W. The emerging significance of O-GlcNAc in cellular regulation. Chem. Rev. 102, 431–438 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wells, L., Whelan, S. A. & Hart, G. W. O-GlcNac: a regulatory post-translational modification. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 302, 435–441 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lindhorst T. K. Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2007)

  5. 5.

    Slawson, C. & Hart, G. W. O-GlcNAc signaling: implications for cancer cell biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 678–684 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Galluzzi, L., Kepp, O., Heiden, M. G. V. & Kroemer, G. Metabolic targets for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 829–846 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liang, D.-M. et al. Glycosyltransferases: mechanisms and applications in natural product development. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 8350–8374 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhu, X. & Schmidt, R. R. New principles for glycoside-bond formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 1900–1934 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Danishefsky, S. J. & Bilodeau, M. T. Glycals in organic synthesis: the evolution of comprehensive strategies for the assembly of oligosaccharides and glycoconjugates of biological consequence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35, 1380–1419 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Seeberger, P. H. The logic of automated glycan assembly. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1450–1463 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Danishefsky, S. J., Shue, Y.-K., Chang, M. N. & Wong, C.-H. Development of Globo-H cancer vaccine. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 643–652 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang, Y., Zhang, X. & Yu, B. O-Glycosylation methods in the total synthesis of complex natural glycosides. Nat. Prod. Rep. 32, 1331–1355 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Boltje, T. J., Buskas, T. & Boons, G.-J. Opportunities and challenges in synthetic oligosaccharide and glycoconjugate research. Nat. Chem. 1, 611–622 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Demchenko, A. V. Handbook of Chemical Glycosylation: Advances in Stereoselectivity and Therapeutic Relevance (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2008).

  15. 15.

    Werz, D. B. & Vidal, S. Modern Synthetic Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry: From Monosaccharides to Complex Glycoconjugates (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2014).

  16. 16.

    Balmond, E. I., Galan, M. C. & McGarrigle, E. M. Recent developments in the application of organocatalysis to glycosylations. Synlett 24, 2335–2339 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Williams, R. & Galan, M. C. Recent advances in organocatalytic glycosylations. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 6247–6264 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peng, P. & Schmidt, R. R. Acid-base catalysis in glycosidations: A nature derived alternative to the generally employed methodology. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 1171–1183 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Balmond, E. I., Coe, D. M. & Galan, M. C. α-Selective organocatalytic synthesis of 2-deoxygalactosides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9152–9155 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Balmond, E. I. et al. A 3,4-Trans-fused cyclic protecting group facilitiates α-selective catalytic synthesis of 2-deoxyglycosides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8190–8194 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kotke, M. & Schreiner, P. R. General applicable organocatalytic tetrahydropyranylation of hydroxyl functionalities with very low catalyst loadings. Synthesis 2007, 779–790 (2007).

  22. 22.

    Geng, Y. et al. Cooperative catalysis in glycosidation reactions with O-glycosyl trichloroacetimidates as glycosyl donors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10089–10092 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Palo-Nieto, C., Sau, Abhijit, Williams, R. & Galan, M. C. Cooperative Brønsted acid-type organocatalysis for the stereoselective synthesis of deoxyglycosides. J. Org. Chem. 82, 407–414 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Medina, S. et al. Stereoselective glycosylation of 2-nitrogalactals catalyzed by a bifunctional organocatalyst. Org. Lett. 18, 4222–4225 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Peng, P., Geng, Y., Göttker-Schnetmann, I. & Schmidt, R. R. 2-Nitro-thioglycosides: α- and β-selective generation and their potential as β-selective glycosyl donors. Org. Lett. 17, 1421–1424 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yoshida, K., Kanoko, Y. & Takao, K. Kinetically controlled α-selective O-Glycosylation of phenol derivatives using 2-nitroglycals by a bifunctional chiral thiourea catalyst. Asian J. Org. Chem. 5, 1230–1236 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kimura, T., Eto, T., Takahashi, D. & Toshima, K. Stereocontrolled photoinduced glycosylation using an aryl thiourea as an organo photoacid. Org. Lett. 18, 3190–3193 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sun, L., Wu, X., Xiong, D.-C. & Ye, X.-S. Stereoselective Koenigs-Knorr glycosylation catalyzed by urea. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 8041–8044 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Park, Y. et al. Macrocyclic bis-thioureas catalyze stereospecific glycosylation reactions. Science 355, 162–166 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cox, D. J., Smith, M. D. & Fairbanks, A. J. Glycosylation catalyzed by a chiral Brønsted acid. Org. Lett. 12, 1452–1455 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tay, J.-H. et al. Regiodivergent glycosylations of 6-deoxy-erythronolide B and oleandomycin-derived macrolactones enabled by chiral acid catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 8570–8578 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee, J., Borovika, A., Khomutnyk, Y. & Nagorny, P. Chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed desymmetrizative glycosylation of 2-deoxystreptamine and its application to aminoglycoside synthesis. Chem. Commun. 53, 8976–8979 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lowary, T. L. Twenty years of mycobacterial glycans: furanosides and beyond. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 1379–1388 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Imamura, A. & Lowary, T. L. Chemical synthesis of furanose glycosides. Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 23, 134–152 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Benett, C. S. Selective Glycosylations: Synthetic Methods and Catalysts (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2017).

  36. 36.

    Kobayashi, Y., Nakatsuji, Y., Li, S., Tsuzuki, S. & Takemoto, Y. Direct N-Glycofunctionalization of amides with glycosyl trichloroacetimidate by thiourea/halogen bond donor co-catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 3646–3650 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wu, Y., Xiong, D.-C., Chen, S.-C., Wang, Y.-S. & Ye, X.-S. Total synthesis of mycobacterial arabinogalactan containing 92 monosaccharide units. Nat. Commun. 8, 14851–14858 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Thadke, A. S. et al. [Au]/[Ag]-catalysed expedient synthesis of branched heneicosafuranosyl arabinogalactan motif of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall. Nat. Commun. 8, 14019 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Houseknecht, J. B. & Lowary, T. L. Chemistry and biology of arabinofuranosyl and galactofuranosyl-containing polysaccharides. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5, 677–682 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Peltier, P., Euzen, R., Daniellou, R., Nugier-Chauvin, C. & Ferrierès, V. Recent knowledge and innovations related to hexofuranosides: Structure, synthesis and applications. Carbohydr. Res. 343, 1897–1923 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gumina, G., Song, G.-Y. & Chu, C.-K. L-Nucleosides as chemotherapeutic agents. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 202, 9–15 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cousins, G. S. & Hoberg, J. O. Synthesis and chemistry of cyclopropanated carbohydrates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 29, 165–174 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Reissig, H.-U. & Zimmer, R. Donor-acceptor-substituted cyclopropane derivatives and their application in organic synthesis. Chem. Rev. 103, 1151–1196 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yu, M. & Pagenkopf, B. L. Recent advances in donor-acceptor cyclopropanes. Tetrahedron 61, 321–347 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ganesh, V., Sridhar, P. R. & Chandrasekaran, S. Synthetic applications of carbohydrate-derived donor-acceptor cyclopropanes. Isr. J. Chem. 56, 417–430 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schneider, T. F., Kaschel, J. & Werz, D. B. A new golden age for donor-acceptor cyclopropanes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5504–5523 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Shao, Z. & Zhang, H. Combining transition metal and organocatalysis: a broad new concept for catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2745–2755 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Du, Z. & Shao, Z. Combining transition metal and organocatalysis: an update. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1337–1378 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tiwari, V. K. et al. Cu-catalyzed Click reaction in carbohydrate chemistry. Chem. Rev. 116, 3086–3240 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wang, C. et al. Methanesulfonic-acid-catalysed ring opening and glycosylation of 1,2-(acetylcyclopropane)-annulated D-Lyxofuranose. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 4592–4599 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tian, Q., Xu, L., Ma, X., Zou, W. & Shao, H. Stereoselective synthesis of 2-C-acetonyl-2-deoxy-D-galactosides using 1,2-cyclopropane- acetylated sugar as novel glycosyl donor. Org. Lett. 12, 540–543 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Tian, Q. et al. Stereoselective synthesis of 2-C-branched (acetylmethyl) oligosaccharides and glycoconjugates: Lewis acid-catalyzed glycosylation from 1,2-cyclopropaneacetylated sugars. J. Org. Chem. 76, 1045–1053 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Fan, Y. & Kass, S. R. Electrostatically enhanced thioureas. Org. Lett. 18, 188–191 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Das, S., Pekel, D., Neudörfl, J.-M. & Berkessel, A. Organocatalytic glycosylation by using electron-deficient pyridinium salts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 12479–12483 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Prassas, I. & Diamandis, E. P. Novel therapeutic applications of cardiac glycosides. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 926–935 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Yu, J., Sun, J. & Yu, B. Construction of interglycosidic N-O linkage via direct glycosylation of sugar oximes. Org. Lett. 14, 4022–4025 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Oman, T. J., Boettcher, J. M., Wang, H., Okalibe, X. N. & van der Donk, W. Sublancin is not a lantibiotic but an S-linked glycopeptide. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 78–80 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Stepper, J. et al. Cysteine S-glycosylation, a new post-translational modification found in glycopeptide bacteriocins. FEBS Lett. 585, 645–650 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Madarász, A. et al. Thiourea derivatives as Brønsted acid organocatalysts. ACS Catal. 6, 4379–4387 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Grossmann, A., Bartlett, S., Janecek, M., Hodgkinson, J. T. & Spring, D. R. Diversity-oriented synthesis of drug-like macrocyclic scaffolds using an orthogonal organo- and metal catalysis strategy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13093–13097 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rostovtsev, V. V., Green, L. G., Fokin, V. V. & Sharpless, K. B. A stepwise Huisgen cycloaddition process: copper(I)-catalyzed regioselective ‘ligation’ of azides and terminal alkynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2596–2599 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Boren, B. C. et al. Ruthenium-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition: scope and mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 8923–8930 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Ferreira, S. B. et al. Synthesis, biological activity, and molecular modeling studies of 1H-1,2,3-triazole derivatives of carbohydrates as α-glucosidases inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 53, 2364–2375 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hang, H. C. & Bertozzi, C. R. Ketone isosteres of 2-N-acetamidosugars as substrates for metabolic cell surface engineering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 1242–1243 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Khidekel, N., Ficarro, S. B., Peters, E. C. & Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. Exploring the O-GlcNAc proteome: direct identification of O-GlcNAc-modified proteins from the brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13132–13137 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wu, Y. et al. Novel indole C-glycosides from Isatis indigotica and their potential cytotoxic activity. Fitoterapia 82, 288–292 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yepremyan, A. & Minehan, T. G. Total synthesis of indole-3-acetonitrile-4-methoxy-2-C-β-D-glucopyranoside. Proposal for structural revision of the natural product.Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 5194–5196 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Fonds der Chemischen Industrie for generous funding to C.C.J.L. through a Liebig fellowship. Prof. Herbert Waldmann is greatly acknowledged for his generous assistance and infrastructural support. C.X. acknowledges the Max Planck Society for post-doctoral funding and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a post-doctoral fellowship. We are grateful for facilities and infrastructural support from the Technical University of Dortmund and the Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Dortmund. Walter Hofer is acknowledged for synthesizing B, D and E. Huei-Ru Wu is acknowledged for the synthesis of 22c. Bernhard Griewel is gratefully acknowledged for NMR expertise and generous assistance in the in-situ NMR monitoring experiments. The NMR department of the faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Biology of the Technical University of Dortmund is gratefully acknowledged for providing NMR timeslots for the kinetic and NMR monitoring experiments.

Author information




C.X. conducted the majority of the experimental work. C.C.J.L. conceived the idea. C.C.J.L. and C.X. designed the experiments and C.C.J.L. supervised the project. C.C.J.L and C.X. contributed to data analysis. All authors discussed the results, commented, and contributed to writing this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles C. J. Loh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Loh, C.C.J. An ultra-low thiourea catalyzed strain-release glycosylation and a multicatalytic diversification strategy. Nat Commun 9, 4057 (2018).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing