Abstract

Lysyl hydroxylases catalyze hydroxylation of collagen lysines, and sustain essential roles in extracellular matrix (ECM) maturation and remodeling. Malfunctions in these enzymes cause severe connective tissue disorders. Human lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3/PLOD3) bears multiple enzymatic activities, as it catalyzes collagen lysine hydroxylation and also their subsequent glycosylation. Our understanding of LH3 functions is currently hampered by lack of molecular structure information. Here, we present high resolution crystal structures of full-length human LH3 in complex with cofactors and donor substrates. The elongated homodimeric LH3 architecture shows two distinct catalytic sites at the N- and C-terminal boundaries of each monomer, separated by an accessory domain. The glycosyltransferase domain displays distinguishing features compared to other known glycosyltransferases. Known disease-related mutations map in close proximity to the catalytic sites. Collectively, our results provide a structural framework characterizing the multiple functions of LH3, and the molecular mechanisms of collagen-related diseases involving human lysyl hydroxylases.

Introduction

Collagen biosynthesis requires multiple post-translational modifications essential for the generation of mature, triple-helical molecules1. Modification of collagen lysines enables subsequent glycosylation and formation of extracellular cross-links, leading to fibrillary or meshwork superstructures2. Enzymes belonging to the family of collagen lysyl hydroxylases (LH or PLOD) catalyze lysine hydroxylation of collagens using Fe2+, 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG), ascorbate and molecular oxygen3,4. In humans, PLOD genes encode for three LH enzyme isoforms sharing >60% amino acid sequence identity: LH1, LH2a/b, and LH3, respectively5. Mutations in PLOD genes that reduce or abolish LH activity are associated with severe connective tissue diseases including Ehlers-Danlos6 and Bruck syndromes7,8. In mouse models, LH3 knock-outs are embrionically lethal9,10. Mutations in the PLOD3 gene also result in impaired collagen glycosylation, secretion, and basement membrane formation, yielding phenotypes resembling osteogenesis imperfecta11. Conversely, PLOD overexpression and upregulated enzymatic activity have been linked to fibrosis12, and recently also to hypoxia-induced metastatic spreading of solid tumors with poor prognosis13,14,15.

LH3 is considered the evolutionary ancestor of the LH family: this isoform is the only one capable of further processing of hydroxylysines through glycosylation, whereas other isoforms might have lost such capability during evolution16. LH3 is therefore a multifunctional enzyme capable of converting collagen lysines into 1,2-glucosylgalactosyl-5-hydroxylysines through three consecutive reactions: hydroxylation of collagen lysines (LH activity), N-linked conjugation of galactose to hydroxylysines (GT activity), and conjugation of glucose to galactosyl-5-hydroxylysines (GGT activity)17,18. Biochemical data suggest that these different enzymatic activities are localized in distinct compartments of the enzyme19, but despite the extensive evidence available, the current knowledge of LH enzymes is far from exhaustive. These enzymes are known to act together with prolyl hydroxylases, respectively introducing hydroxylations of lysine and proline residues on procollagens in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), prior to the formation of triple-helical assemblies20. In line with this, LH enzymes are found as ER-resident proteins albeit they do not possess specific ER-retention sequences21,22. Reports suggest that ER retention could be mediated via interaction with distinct ER-resident proteins: LH1 is described to be part of a macromolecular complex with SC65, P3H3 and CYPB23; while LH2 forms a complex with HSP47, FKBP65 and BiP24,25; LH3 was found colocalizing with collagen galactosyltransferases GLT25D1/226. Multiple reports identify LH3 also in the extracellular space and suggest dedicated trafficking mechanisms for its secretion27,28,29,30. Abnormalities in LH3 post-Golgi trafficking are associated with devastating developmental diseases with phenotypes characterized by immature collagen accumulation and lack of its secretion, very similar to those observed in case of enzyme malfunctions caused by knock-down or inactivation9,10,11,30,31. Very recently, LH2 secretion has been reported associated with hypoxia-induced PLOD2 overexpression in metastatic tumor microenvironments13,15. Extracellular LHs were reported to be active, suggesting implications for ECM stability and remodeling27. These data indicate that although lysine modifications are known to occur in the ER prior to collagen triple helical formation, secreted variants of LH3 and LH2 can modify collagens in different compartments and, possibly, in different folding states32.

The accumulated knowledge about the precise molecular roles and mechanisms associated with LH enzymes has suffered from the lack of molecular structure models fundamental to shed light on the complexity and the diversity of this important enzyme family. Here, we present the crystal structures of multifunctional full-length human LH3 in complex with various cofactors and donor substrates. The structures reveal a multidomain architecture characterized by two independent catalytic sites devoted to the different enzymatic activities and provide a molecular understanding that has implications for various disease-related mutations found in LH enzymes. Altogether, our results offer new insights into the complex mechanisms of collagen biosynthesis and homeostasis, and provide structural templates for the development of targeted therapies for LH-related diseases and cancer.

Results

LH3 has three domains encompassing multiple catalytic sites

We have generated human stable cell lines for large-scale production of full length, glycosylated human LH3, and established methods for its purification and evaluation of its LH and GT enzymatic activities (Supplementary Fig. 1). ICP-MS analyses indicated that all enzyme preparations contained Fe2+ with a 1:1 stoichiometry (see Methods). We observed significant uncoupling (up to 25%) of donor substrate activation, with substrate-independent generation of the succinate or UDP reaction products, respectively. Nevertheless, we could detect significantly increased enzymatic activity in the presence of synthetic peptides (Supplementary Fig. 1C) or gelatin (Supplementary Fig. 1D) as acceptor substrates. We could confirm such reactivity by detection of concentration-dependent binding (Supplementary Fig. 2A) and appearance of post-translationally modified lysine residues on synthetic peptides upon LH3 treatment (Supplementary Fig. 2B). In our peptide binding measurements, all surface plasmon resonance (SPR) profiles were characterized by very fast association and dissociation events and very weak (millimolar) binding affinities (Supplementary Fig. 2A).

Crystal structures of LH3 were determined in complex with various substrates and cofactors at resolutions ranging between 2.1 and 3.0 Å (Supplementary Table 1). Diffraction data were systematically affected by strong anisotropy (Supplementary Fig. 3), thus structure determination required anisotropy correction followed by a combination of experimental phasing with heavy atom and highly redundant native single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD), eventually yielding electron density maps of superb quality (Supplementary fig. 4A, B). Residues Asn63 and Asn548 showed extended electron densities protruding from their side chains (Supplementary fig. 4C), indicating the expected N-linked glycosylations. The LH3 monomer encompasses three domains aligned along one direction (Fig. 1a). The first two N-terminal domains show Rossmann-fold architectures reminiscent of glycosyltransferases33,34, whereas the C-terminal domain is characterized by a double-stranded β-helix (DSBH) fold, highly conserved among the 2-OG, Fe2+-dependent dioxygenases35,36. Overall, the three-dimensional structure of the LH3 full-length enzyme provides a molecular blueprint to elucidate previous suggestions on the enzyme architecture based on biochemical data: GT and GGT activities localize at the N-terminus of the enzyme, whereas the LH activity is segregated at the LH3 C-terminus37,38.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Molecular architecture of human LH3. a Cartoon representation of the LH3 enzyme, showing its organization with three domains aligned from the N- to the C- terminus. Based on results of functional assays, the first two glycosyltransferase domains have been named GT (catalytic glycosyltransferase, blue) and AC (accessory, orange), respectively. The C-terminal domain hosts the Fe2+ and 2-OG cofactors necessary for lysyl hydroxylase activity, and therefore has been named LH (green). Metal ions are shown as spheres, cofactors and glycans as sticks. b Introduction of additional glycosylation sites identifies the LH3 dimer interface in solution. Glycosylated mutants R714N and T672N induce disruption of the dimeric assembly, as observed in analytical size exclusion chromatography experiments. Control glycosylated mutant W148N-L150T, located at a crystal contact interface, is a dimer as wild-type LH3. c Overview of the LH3 dimer as observed in the crystal structures. The quaternary arrangement highlights an elongated tail-to-tail dimer extending for over 20 nm in one direction, connected through strong electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions near the LH catalytic site. Fe2+ and 2-OG in the neighboring catalytic site are shown with spheres and sticks, respectively. For clarity, one LH3 monomer is colored as in a, whereas the other is shown in white. d The molecular interface connecting two C-terminal LH domains in the LH3 crystal structure is characterized by strong hydrophobic interactions involving Leu715 of one monomer (green) and various aromatic residues shaping a cavity on the opposite monomer (white). This hydrophobic contact is surrounded by electrostatic interactions. For clarity, only the amino acids of one monomer are labeled. e Details of the LH3 dimer interface. Shown is the electrostatic potential computed using APBS70 colored from −10 kbTec−1 (red) to +10 kbTec−1 (blue)

LH3 forms elongated tail-to-tail dimers

Although the asymmetric units of our LH3 crystal structures contain a single LH3 monomer, previous biochemical studies20,38 and our size exclusion chromatography coupled to small-angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS) analyses consistently showed 200 kDa dimers in solution (Supplementary Fig. 1A). The crystal packing indeed suggests two homodimeric arrangements with physiologically plausible assemblies (Supplementary Fig. 5). A first, elongated, tail-to-tail quaternary structure shares nearly identical dimer interface with that observed recently in a C-terminal fragment of a viral LH homolog (L230-LH)39. This interface interconnects the C-terminal domains of LH3 and exposes individual glycosyltransferase domains at the two sides of the dimer (Supplementary Fig. 5B). A second, more compact antiparallel conformation is characterized by contacts between the glycosyltransferase domains and exposes individual lysyl hydroxylase domains at the two sides of the dimer (Supplementary Fig. 5C). Both interfaces are characterized by a large buried surface area and numerous hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions. Previous biochemical characterizations based on C-terminal LH3 deletions indicated residues Lys541-Glu547 as essential for dimerization38. In our structures, both observed dimeric assemblies fully support this statement, as this region is located in a linking platform connecting the central glycosyltransferase domain with the C-terminal domain (Fig. 1a). Initial attempts using SAXS and computational methods to discriminate between crystallographic contacts and stable dimers in solution (Supplementary Fig. 56) were not conclusive. A recent report suggested that in both homologous viral L230-LH domain and in human LH2, replacement of the fully conserved, surface-exposed C-terminal residue Leu715 (LH3 numbering, located in the middle of the “elongated” dimer interface found in the LH3 crystal structure) with a charged Asp could disrupt the enzyme’s dimeric assembly and generate inactive, monomeric species in solution39. We took advantage of this information and introduced the corresponding L715D mutation in LH3; we also opted for generating a second mutant, bearing a positive Arg side chain replacing Leu715. Surprisingly, the L715D mutant was comparable to wild-type LH3 in activity assays and in analytical size exclusion chromatography experiments, while we observed slightly increased retention volumes and abolished LH activity for the L715R mutant (Supplementary Fig. 7). Similarly, removal of Fe2+ using chelating agents and acidification, successfully exploited to destabilize both viral LH and human LH2 dimer interfaces39 did not seem to affect LH3 stability (Supplementary Fig. 7C). We therefore decided to introduce more pronounced steric hindrance at the observed crystallographic dimer interfaces, through mutations carrying additional glycosylation sites. Mutants T672N and R714N, both adding a glycosylation near the C-terminal dimer interface as verified by SDS-PAGE and enzymatic deglycosylation experiments (Supplementary Fig. 7A, B, Supplementary Fig. 17), shifted the size exclusion retention volumes towards monomeric species (Fig. 1b) and abolished LH activity (Supplementary Fig. 7D). On the contrary, the LH3 mutant W148N-L150T, introducing an additional glycosylation at the “compact” N-terminal interface did not affect the dimeric quaternary structure of LH3 nor the LH enzymatic activity (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 7D). We therefore concluded that the physiological LH3 dimeric assembly corresponds to the elongated, tail-to-tail arrangement shown in Fig. 1c. This interface is characterized by two-fold symmetric interactions involving a rather limited set of aminoacid side chains engaged in electrostatic contacts, plus a deep hydrophobic cavity shaped by Phe673, Phe639, Tyr642 and Thr672 hosting the side chain of Leu715 from the opposite monomer (Fig. 1d, e).

Structural insights into LH3 glycosyltransferase activity

The N-terminal LH3 glycosyltransferase domain partially shares tertiary structure topology with divalent metal ion-dependent class-A glycosyltransferase folds (GT-A)33, but with distinguishing structural features as expected given the very low sequence identity conservation, lower than 12%. Indeed, although numerous three-dimensional structures of GT-A glycosyltransferases are available in the protein data bank, superpositions with even the closest structural homolog yielded root mean square deviations (r.m.s.d.) higher than 3 Å (Supplementary Fig. 8A). Notably, this LH3 domain lacks a highly conserved α-β hairpin at its N-terminus near residue Gly70, and includes other structural elements surprisingly well conserved at the primary sequence level within the LH enzyme family (Supplementary Fig. 9), but distinct from other glycosyltransferases. In particular, the conformations of four loops differ from GT-A structures and shape the substrate-binding face of the N-terminal domain of LH3 (Supplementary Fig. 8A). Among these, a very flexible surface loop comprising residues Gly72 to Gly87 is not visible in the electron density of ligand-free LH3 structures. This loop contains several residues highly conserved among LH isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 9), which are not found in other glycosyltransferases. A cavity characterized by aspartate residues 112 and 115 and His253 shapes the metal ion binding site. Co-crystallizations with Mn2+ resulted in appearance of strong electron density proximate to these residues for the metal ion and two coordinating water molecules, without observable conformational changes compared to ligand-free LH3 (Supplementary Fig. 10A). Co-crystallizations with Mn2+ and donor substrates UDP-galactose or UDP-glucose yielded additional clear electron densities for UDP, but not for the glycan moieties (Fig. 2a). We observed weak electron density near the UDP pyrophosphate group partially compatible with glycan donor substrates, but we refrain from modeling anything inside this weak density, likely representative of multiple conformations simultaneously trapped in the substrate binding cavity (Supplementary Fig. 10B). We could not detect significant differences when comparing co-crystal structures obtained using UDP-Gal or UDP-Glc donor substrates. Nonetheless, binding of these donor substrates induced dramatic conformational changes in the enzyme’s catalytic site, with full stabilization of the flexible Gly72-Gly87 loop in a “closed” conformation (Fig. 2b). The UDP pyrophosphate group is stabilized by interactions with Mn2+ and hydrogen bonding with Lys259 and backbone nitrogen of Gly256; both residues are positioned in a uniquely shaped α-helix located at the C-terminus of the domain. The hydroxyl groups of the ribose form a network of hydrogen bonds with backbone atoms of Ser113 and Tyr114. The uracil moiety is sandwiched through π-π stacking interactions between Trp75 and Tyr114, and is stabilized by hydrogen bonding with Thr46 (Fig. 2a, b, Supplementary Fig. 10). Of note, these two residues highlight an unprecedented arrangement of UDP binding residues in glycosyltransferases: Trp75 belongs to the distinctive LH3 flexible loop covering residues Gly72-Gly87, that becomes fully stabilized upon substrate binding (Fig. 2b); Tyr114 is part of a non-canonical DxxD motif (Supplementary fig. 9), where Asp112, and Asp115 are responsible for Mn2+ coordination. Structurally related glycosyltransferases also often bear tyrosine residues stacking with the UDP moiety, but these residues are located far in sequence from the canonical DxD motif40,41 responsible for metal ion coordination. Site-directed mutagenesis on Trp75 or Tyr114 into alanine residues yielded folded, but almost completely inactive LH3 variants (Fig. 2c, Supplementary fig. 11). Binding data using SPR on synthetic collagen peptides showed very limited differences between wild-type and mutant LH3 (Supplementary Fig. 11D). Together, these results highlight the distinguishing roles of Trp75 and Tyr114 in donor substrate binding and stabilization.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Insights into LH3 glycosyltransferase activity. a Co-crystallizations with Mn2+ and donor substrates revealed clear electron density (2Fo-Fc omit electron density maps, green mesh, contour level 1.2 σ) for the metal ion and for UDP in the catalytic site of the N-terminal GT domain. Residues involved in coordination of the metal ion are shown with orange sticks, while residues interacting and stabilizing UDP binding are shown in blue. Residue Asn223, found mutated into a Ser and causing pathogenic phenotypes similar to osteogenesis imperfecta, is shown with magenta sticks. b Binding of donor substrates induces conformational changes in the GT domain. Shown is a superposition of ligand-free (yellow), Mn2+-bound (blue), and Mn2+-donor substrate-bound (violet) structures of LH3 GT domain. Only the UDP-Gal-bound structure is shown; the conformation observed in UDP-Glc-bound structure is identical. Flexible loop 72–87 becomes well defined only in donor substrate-bound structures; in these structures, residues Trp145 and Trp148 adopt different conformations. c Luminescence-based assays for the evaluation of LH3 GT enzymatic activity show that mutants W75A, Y114A, and N223S are inactive. Control experiments were performed without adding enzyme. Error bars represent standard deviations from average of triplicate independent experiments. Statistical evaluations based on pair sample comparisons between uncoupled and coupled assay values using Student’s t-test. *P-value <0.05; ***P-value <0.001. d Details of the interface between the N-terminal (GT, blue) and the central (AC, orange) LH3 glycosyltransferase domain. Residues found at the interface are shown as sticks (side chain view only). The disulfide bond found in the linker region between the two domains is shown with yellow spheres on the sulfur atoms

Two tryptophan residues Trp145 and Trp148 proximate to the UDP-binding cavity consistently change their side chain conformations in structures with bound donor substrates (Fig. 2b). In UDP-glycan-bound structures, residue Trp145 adopts a conformation that can easily accommodate the sugar moiety during catalysis (Fig. 2b). In the absence of donor substrates this residue partially obstructs the cavity, thus acting as a gating residue to host the UDP-glycan (Fig. 2b). Trp148 localizes on the LH3 surface, in a region distant from the glycosyltransferase catalytic site located at the interface between two crystallographically related LH3 molecules. Interestingly, both Trp145 and Trp148 residues are located in one of the loops that are not conserved neither in glycosyltransferases, nor in other LH enzymes (Supplementary Fig. 9): this region may therefore have a role in recognition and binding of donor and/or acceptor substrates, highlighting the unusual mechanisms of LH3 GT/GGT activity. Of note, mutagenesis studies aimed at characterizing LH3 GT/GGT activities showed that residues in this loop are indeed critical for LH3-mediated collagen glycosylation19 (Supplementary Table 2). The neighboring region comprising residues 187–191 is characterized by a non-conserved poly-Asp repeat (Supplementary Fig. 10B), and mutations on Asp190 and Asp191 were reported to abolish the glycosyltransferase activity19 (Supplementary Table 2). In UDP-bound structures, this short loop forms contacts with the stabilized Gly72-Gly87 loop directly involved in UDP interaction (Fig. 2b). Although Asp190 and Asp191 are not directly involved in binding of enzyme cofactors and substrates, both residues point towards the active site near Trp145, possibly playing roles as nucleophiles during the glycosyltransferase reaction, or supporting solvent-bridged interactions with the glycan co-substrates.

Interestingly, the pathogenic LH3 mutation N223S, responsible for an LH3-dependent developmental connective tissue disorder with phenotype resembling osteogenesis imperfecta11 localizes in close proximity to the identified LH3 GT/GGT catalytic site (Fig. 2a). This mutation was reported to introduce a new N-linked glycosylation site on residue Asn221, resulting in strongly reduced LH3 GT/GGT activity (Supplementary Table 2). We produced this enzyme variant obtaining a folded, dimeric enzyme comparable with wild type LH3 (Supplementary Fig. 11A, B). However, due to pronounced instability and high propensity to degradation for this mutant, we could not unambiguously confirm that this disease-linked mutant bears an additional glycosylation (Supplementary Fig. 11A). LH3 N223S showed severely reduced lysyl hydroxylase and fully abolished glycosyltransferase activities (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 11C). As we did not observe changes in LH3 oligomeric assembly in the presence of this pathogenic mutation (Supplementary Fig. 11B), we concluded that the lack of enzymatic activity caused by this variant is likely due to the alterations in enzyme stability, possibly introduced by the novel glycosylation on Asn221, which would interfere with recognition of acceptor substrate molecules.

The C-terminal part of the first glycosyltransferase domain of LH3 incorporates other uniquely structured regions: a long, non-conserved beta hairpin constituted by residues Val229-Ala244 points towards the domain face opposite to the GT/GGT catalytic site. This segment is stabilized by numerous hydrophobic contacts including Phe233, Trp273 and with a non-conserved α-helix formed by residues Pro257-Glu276, which is sandwiched between the first and the second domain of LH3 (Fig. 2d). Residues linking these two domains extend to a solvent-exposed region of the enzyme comprising the Cys279-Cys282 disulfide bridge and a flexible loop extending from Asp285 to Gly292, and not visible in the electron density. Antibodies targeting these residues were reported to reduce GT activity17, suggesting a role for this surface-exposed region in modulating accessibility of acceptor substrates to the identified glycosyltransferase catalytic site (Supplementary Table 2).

In the central LH3 domain, two previously suggested candidate metal ion binding sites are present, identified by a DxD (Asp392, Ala393, Asp394) and a DxDxD (Asp486, Thr487, Asp488, Pro489, Asp490) motif, respectively18,19 (Supplementary Fig. 12). Co-crystallization experiments with metal ions and glycosyltransferase substrates and products did not highlight any appreciable differences within this domain compared to ligand-free structures (Supplementary Fig 13A). On the contrary, superposition of the two glycosyltransferase domains of LH3 showed remarkable differences, emphasized by the unique features found in the first domain (Supplementary Fig. 8, Supplementary Fig. 13B). Although the overall fold of the second domain shares higher similarity than the first with known GT-A type glycosyltransferases (Supplementary Fig. 13C, D), extensive mutagenesis experiments did not allow clear identification of residues implicated in metal ion or substrate binding for LH3 GT catalytic activity18,19 (Supplementary Table 2). Our structures highlight an unusual conformation for the Val304-Phe310 loop: this region overlaps with the donor substrate binding site observed in structural homologs, strongly interfering with donor substrate binding (Supplementary Fig. 13E). Furthermore, recombinant N-terminal LH3 constructs devoid of this domain were still capable of glycosylating collagen peptides similar to the wild-type enzyme19 (Supplementary Table 2). Collectively, these data indicate that despite the overall conservation of the glycosyltransferase fold, this domain may have lost its enzymatic capabilities during evolution. It may therefore constitute a non-catalytic accessory element within the LH3 architecture, possibly involved in collagen substrate recognition or interactions with LH binding partners. Thus, we named the LH3 N-terminal domain catalytic glycosyltransferase (GT), and the central domain accessory (AC).

Structural insights into LH3 lysyl hydroxylase activity

The C-terminal domain of LH3 hosts the lysyl hydroxylase catalytic site of the enzyme. This domain shows the typical DSBH fold, characterized by two β-sheets with antiparallel β-strands flanked by three α-helices (Fig. 3a). This fold is preceded by two additional short helices covering residues Thr523 to Asp554, serving as a buffer platform between the AC and the LH domain (Fig. 1a). Residues 590–610 constitute a flexible loop capping the LH catalytic site. Superposition with identified structural homologs highlighted the high conservation of the overall fold and the consistent presence of highly flexible residues near the Fe2+, 2-OG binding site (Supplementary Fig. 14A). The recently determined structure of a viral L230-LH domain39 shows very high overall similarity (r.m.s.d. = 1.3 Å), with the exception of surface-exposed residues Ser550-Ile558, likely due to the non-conserved N-linked glycosylation at residue Asn548 (Supplementary Fig. 14B); also the structure of the viral LH fragment shows a completely flexible capping loop. All our LH3 structures systematically showed Fe2+ and 2-OG in the electron density near the core of this domain (Fig. 3a), confirming that these cofactors are tightly bound to the enzyme and providing a possible explanation for the observed substrate uncoupled LH enzymatic activity (Supplementary Fig. 1C, D). Given the high structural similarity of our LH3 structure with the LH domain of the viral variant, we were surprised not to find the 2-OG cofactor in this structure. We interpreted this difference as due to usage of a prokaryotic expression system for the recombinant production of the viral homolog39. In human LH3, the Fe2+ ion is stabilized by interactions with residue His719 and with residues His667 and Asp669, which constitute part of a HxD motif fully conserved in the Fe2+, 2-OG dioxygenase enzyme family (Supplementary Fig. 15). Mutations in these residues17, including a recently identified pathogenic variant of LH2 causing Bruck syndrome8, were found to completely abolish LH activity (Supplementary Table 2). Pathogenic LH3 mutations causing premature C-terminal enzyme truncations lacking His719 were found incapable of hydroxylating collagen lysines, although retaining GT/GGT activities11 (Supplementary Table 2). Residues Tyr656, Cys691 and Arg729 are fully conserved among LH isoforms and delimit the pocket hosting the 2-OG cofactor (Supplementary Fig. 14C). In particular, the side chain of free Cys691 contributes to the positioning of the carboxyl moiety of the 2-OG cofactor in the direction of Arg729, forming a salt bridge with the guanidinium group of this residue. In addition, biochemical mutations of Arg729 in homologous LH1 (Arg719 in LH3) were reported to cause complete loss of LH activity due to decreased binding affinity for 2-OG42; these data are also in agreement with a recent report analyzing these mutations in the viral L230-LH homolog39 (Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Insights into LH3 lysyl hydroxylase activity. a All our LH3 structures consistently show clear electron density for bound Fe2+ and 2-OG in the LH catalytic cavity (2Fo-Fc omit electron density maps, green mesh, contour level 1.2 σ). Residues involved in interactions with Fe2+ and 2-OG are shown with green sticks. b Co-crystallizations with Fe2+ allow identification of a second metal ion bound near the LH catalytic site that stabilizes the flexible capping loop 590–610 (shown in pink). c Evaluation of collagen substrate coupled and uncoupled LH3 LH activities as a function of Fe2+ concentration. Error bars represent standard deviations from average of triplicate independent experiments. d In Fe2+ co-crystal structures, the conformation observed for residue Arg599 mimics the collagen lysine substrate in front of the 2-OG cofactor, yielding a non-productive ternary complex. Shown is the superposition of this conformation found in the LH3 LH domain (green) with an homologous algal prolyl-4-hydroxylase (white) in complex with a short poly-PS peptide (yellow)43. The LH3 loop 590–610 is shown in pink

Excess Fe2+ induces a state showing substrate mimicry

By increasing the Fe2+ concentration in crystallization experiments, we serendipitously found that this metal ion contributes to the overall enzyme stabilization, systematically enhancing the quality and the resolution of X-ray diffraction data. Analysis of electron density maps allowed the identification of a second Fe2+ in the LH domain, coordinated by residues His595, Asp597, Asp611 and His613 (Fig. 3b). Metal ion coordination stabilizes the flexible capping loop 590–610 into a conformation that completely plugs the LH catalytic site, in proximity to the dimer interface (Supplementary Fig. 16A). We could observe a very similar arrangement, although slightly more flexible, by replacing Fe2+ with Mn2+ in crystallization experiments (Supplementary Fig. 16B). Early reports indicated that LH enzymes may be inhibited by high concentrations of metal ions20. We probed LH3 enzymatic activity in the presence of increasing concentrations of Fe2+, and found that the enzymatic activity peaks at 25 μM Fe2+ concentration. Higher metal ion concentrations yield significant reduction of LH uncoupling, but do not seem to affect the enzymatic reactivity in the presence of synthetic peptide substrates (Fig. 3c). In the metal-ion stabilized conformations we also found that residue Arg599 forms a salt bridge with the 2-OG co-substrate, yielding a conformation that may mimic the collagen lysine substrate. The positioning of Arg599 indeed superimposes to that of a collagen proline residue as observed in a homologous prolyl hydroxylase structure in complex with a short peptide43 (Fig. 3d).

Discussion

Despite being known for over 40 years44, several molecular aspects underlying collagen lysyl hydroxylases function are still obscure. Our crystal structures of full-length human LH3 rationalize the accumulated biochemical knowledge, offering a template to better understand the molecular mechanisms of LH3-dependent collagen hydroxylation and glycosylation.

The two different enzymatic activities are segregated in two distinct catalytic sites 80 Å apart within the same enzyme molecule. The overall dimeric arrangement, experimentally validated through site-directed mutagenesis, shows an elongated tail-to-tail quaternary assembly (Fig. 1c), characterized by a relatively small hydrophobic contact platform surrounded by electrostatic contacts that stabilize the dimer interface near the LH catalytic site (Fig. 1c–e) and closely resemble those recently reported for homologous human LH2 and viral L23039 (Supplementary Fig. 14B). As previously suggested, dimerization is essential for LH activity, whereas disruption of physiological dimers does not significantly perturb the N-terminal glycosyltransferase activities of LH338,39.

We identified two glycosyltransferase domains at the N-terminus of the enzyme characterized by Rossmann fold-like domain architecture and partial similarity with known GT-A glycosyltransferases. However, only the first domain is active: the GT domain (residues 33–277) is the solely responsible for glycosyltransferase activities (both GT and GGT), albeit showing unique features in multiple regions of its fold strongly divergent from known glycosyltransferases (Supplementary Fig. 8). Sequence alignments comparing human LH isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 9) and analysis of donor substrate-free and bound structures do not provide a direct explanation for the lack of GT/GGT activities in homologous LH1 and LH2. Nearly all residues surrounding the UDP moiety and shaping the LH3 glycosyltransferase catalytic site are conserved, including those involved in the unprecedented mode of UDP-substrate stabilization characterized by dual π-π stacking with Trp75 and Tyr114. Nevertheless, sequence conservation at the rim of the catalytic site is much lower (Supplementary Fig. 9), suggesting that lack of collagen substrate recognition may be the reason for the absence of glycosyltransferase activity in homologous LH isoforms.

The adjacent AC domain does not appear to be directly involved in enzyme function. Surprisingly, this domain shares the highest structural similarities with known glycosyltransferases, and yet it may have lost its function during evolution through mutations that introduced steric hindrance in the donor and acceptor substrate binding regions (Supplementary Fig. 13E). Despite the lack of direct evidence of substrate recognition capabilities, the elongated quaternary structure of the LH3 enzyme allows to speculate about possible long-range collagen substrate recognition mechanisms involving this domain. Alternatively, it may serve as a docking module for interactions with binding partners, such as the proposed collagen glycosyltransferases GLT25D1/226 or chaperones like FKBP6524,25.

In the C-terminal LH domain both Fe2+ and 2-OG are natively retained and consistently found in the electron densities of all our structures (Fig. 3a). Enzymatic assays show that LH activity is present without the need for Fe2+ supplementation, demonstrating that the metal ion remains tightly bound into the active site during catalysis, and supporting recent reports also indicating essential roles for the metal ion in folding maintenance of LH domain39. Concentrations higher than 25 μM affect the LH3 uncoupled catalytic activity, but do not seem to affect substrate processing. Crystals grown with excess Fe2+ or Mn2+ show stabilization of a substrate gating loop, with formation of a self-inactivated ternary complex between Fe2+, 2-OG and the side chain of Arg599 mimicking the collagen lysine substrate and obstructing the enzyme’s active site (Fig. 3b, c). Despite gating loops have been described for prolyl-hydroxylases43,45,46, the presence of a metal ion-induced gating seems a prerogative of LH enzymes. Given the full conservation in the LH enzyme family of amino acid residues involved in coordination of the second Fe2+ (Supplementary Fig. 15), we postulate that a general mechanism for metal ion-dependent regulation of LH activity may rely on generation of a self-inactivated resting state with interlocking of the 591–610 gating loop in front of the catalytic site. Remarkably, mutation of LH2 conserved homologous Arg599 into a histidine, as well as other mutations localized on this gating loop, perturb the enzymatic activity and cause Bruck syndrome7 (Supplementary Table 2). This corroborates the proposed role of the 590–610 gating loop in modulating substrate accessibility to the LH active site, and in particular the role of conserved Arg599 as non-productive substrate mimicry.

The LH3 structures allow understanding the molecular phenotypes associated to most of the pathogenic mutations involving LH enzymes (Fig. 4). The LH3 N223S variant causing connective tissue disorders similar to osteogenesis imperfecta was reported to introduce a novel N-linked glycosylation near the cavity hosting the glycosyltransferase donor substrates. Our experiments show that this alteration strongly affects the enzyme’s stability, causing degradation, and completely abolishes GT and GGT activities. Pathogenic mutations of LH1 responsible for the kyphoscoliotic variant of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome were reported to reduce, but not abolish, mechanisms of collagen recognition and catalysis (Supplementary Table 2). This is fully consistent with their localization on the enzyme’s surface, distant from the identified catalytic sites, with the exception of pathogenic mutation H706R, which maps to a conserved residue in close proximity to the homodimer interface. Conversely, LH2 mutations causing severe Bruck syndrome are located within the LH active site, either proximate to the 2-OG binding site, directly involved in Fe2+ coordination, or in the self-inactivated capping loop, also including the lysine mimicry residue Arg599 (Supplementary Table 2). Given the recent reports describing implications of human LH2 and its upregulated enzymatic activity in metastatic spreading of numerous solid tumors13, our full-length structures of self-inhibited human LH3 constitute a valid template for structure-based drug discovery campaigns aiming at blocking unwanted collagen lysine hydroxylation in tumor microenvironments.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Mapping of disease-related mutations identified in LH enzymes on the LH3 crystal structure. The positions of pathogenic mutations causing Ehlers-Danlos type VI syndrome in LH1 (cyan), Bruck syndrome type II in LH2 (yellow), and connective tissue diseases sharing phenotype features with osteogenesis imperfecta (red) in LH3 are shown as spheres on the LH3 dimer structure. Mutations N223S and C691A*, found on LH3, are labeled in red in one of the two monomers. A complete list of mutations reported in the literature and their significance based on evaluation of their mapping on the LH3 crystal structure is shown in Supplementary Table 2

In conclusion, the crystal structures of full-length human LH3 in complex with various cofactors and donor substrates provide a molecular understanding of the biochemical knowledge underlying the multiple functions of this enzyme. Our data shed light on the unique molecular architecture of the LH3 glycosyltransferase domains, and allow understanding of the molecular bases of multiple genetic diseases involving LH3 and homologous human lysyl hydroxylases.

Methods

Chemicals

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified.

DNA constructs

Human LH3 gene (GenBank accession number BC011674.2) was obtained from Source Bioscience. Oligonucleotides containing in-frame 5′-BamHI and 3′-NotI were designed and used to sub-clone the LH3 sequence devoid of the N-terminal signal peptide into the pUPE.106.08 expression vector, kindly provided by U-protein Express, BV (U-PE, The Netherlands) and into the pPuro-DHFR, containing the Streptomyces alboniger puromycin resistance gene (isolated from the pPUR plasmid, Clontech) and the mouse dihydrofolate reductase cDNA47. Both expression vectors bear N-terminal signal peptide followed by a N-terminal 6xHis-tag and a recognition site for Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease prior to an in-frame BamHI restriction site, as well as an in-frame stop codon after the NotI restriction site. LH3 mutants were generated using the Phusion Site Directed Mutagenesis Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) following manufacturer’s instructions. The entire plasmid was amplified using phosphorylated primers. For all mutants the forward primer introduced the mutation of interest (Supplementary table 4). All expression plasmids were checked by Sanger sequencing prior to usage.

Recombinant LH3 expression from stable HeLa cell lines

The pPuro-DHFR-LH3 construct was transfected into human cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa S3, provided by ATCC and further selected for high transfection efficiency by Dr.F. Peverali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pavia) using the Lipofectamine LTX reagent (Invitrogen). Cells were not authenticated and not tested for mycoplasma contamination. Stably transfected clones, isolated with 1 mg mL−1 puromycin (Invivogen), were subjected to step-wise selection with increasing methotrexate concentrations to select for cells containing multiple copies of the plasmid. Cells were routinely cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in high-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (Biowest), 1× non-essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine and 1× penicillin-streptomycin. Clones expressing high yields of PLOD3 were identified by SDS-PAGE analysis after imidazole elution from small-scale immobilized metal ion affinity purification using Nickel sepharose beads (GE Healthcare).

Recombinant LH3 expression from transient HEK293 cells

Recombinant tagged LH3 mutants were produced using suspension cultures of HEK293F (Invitrogen) cells. Cells were not authenticated and not tested for mycoplasma contamination. Cells were transfected at cell densities of 1 million mL−1 using 3 μg of polyethyleneimine (PEI; Polysciences, Germany) for 1 μg of pUPE.106.08-LH3 plasmid DNA per mL of cells. Cultures were supplemented with 0.6% Primatone RL 4 h after transfection. The cell medium containing secreted LH3 was collected 6 days after transfection by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 15 min.

Purification of LH3 enzymes

The LH3-containing medium from either HeLa or HEK293 cell cultures was filtered through a syringe 0.2 mm filter. The pH and ionic strength of the filtrated medium were adjusted using a concentrated buffer stock to reach a final concentration of 25 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)−1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES)/NaOH, 500 mM NaCl, 30 mM imidazole, pH 8.0. LH3 was purified using affinity and size-exclusion chromatography on Äkta systems (GE Healthcare). The filtered supernatant was first loaded onto a 20 mL His-Prep FF column (GE Healthcare) and eluted using 250 mM imidazole. The eluate was then loaded onto a 5 mL HiTrap desalting FF column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 25 mM HEPES, NaOH, 500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0. The N-terminal histidine-tag was cleaved using overnight TEV protease digestion at 4 °C followed by affinity-based removal of TEV protease and His-tag using a 5 mL HisTrap FF (GE Healthcare). The protein was concentrated to 5 mg mL−1 using 30,000 MWCO Vivaspin Turbo centrifugal filters (Sartorius), then loaded onto a Superdex 200 10/300 GL (preparative scale) or onto a Superdex 200 5/150 GL (analytical scale) columns (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 25 mM HEPES/NaOH, 200 mM NaCl, pH 8.0. LH3-containing fractions as assessed from SDS-PAGE analysis were pooled, concentrated and stored at −80 °C until further usage.

LH3 deglycosylation

Wild-type LH3 and mutants T672N, L714N, and W148N-L150T were subject to deglycosylation to validate the introduction of an additional glycosylation site through mutagenesis. 20 μL protein at 0.15 mg mL−1 were first incubated with 1X Glycoprotein Denaturing Buffer (New England BioLabs) and denatured at 95 °C for10 min. 1X glycobuffer 2 (New England BioLabs), 1% NP-40, and 0.2 μL (100 Units) of PNGase F (New England BioLabs) were added to the reaction mix, which was further incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. PNGase F-treated and untreated samples were then analyzed using western blotting with rabbit anti-LH3 antibody (Proteintech 11027–1-AP) in a 1:1000 ratio followed by anti-rabbit HRP-conjugate antibody (Sigma-Aldrich A0545) in a 1:3000 ratio.

ICP-MS measurements

To measure the number of tightly bound divalent metal ions 3 mg of LH3 were diluted in 5 mL 25 mM HEPES, 500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0. Three aliquots of 1 ml each were kept overnight with 0.5 mL 65% ultra-pure HNO3 and 0.1 mL 30% w/w H2O2, then diluted to 5 mL with Milli-Q water and analyzed by ICP-MS. The measurements of Fe and Mn were performed on a Perkin Elmer Mod ELAN DRC-e instrument, following the standard procedures suggested by the manufacturer. Quantitative determinations were obtained by the external standard calibration with five standards (0, 5, 10, 50, 100, and 300 µg L−1) daily prepared in the same buffer used for samples preparation, at the same dilution and HNO3 concentration. Only Fe was quantified in each replicate solution, with standard deviation of the mean value of 8%, obtaining a molar ratio Fe/LH3 = 1, while Mn was present as impurity in the blank and in the samples.

Crystallization of LH3

LH3 spherulites were found in nanoliter-dispensed droplets (0.1 μL protein at 4 mg mL−1 + 0.1 μL reservoirs) using commercial crystallization screens in sitting vapor diffusion drop plates. These spherulites were initially optimized by mixing 0.5 μL of protein concentrated at 3.5 mg mL−1 and 0.5 μL of reservoir solution composed of 600 mM sodium formate, 12% poly-glutamic-acid (PGA-LM, Molecular Dimensions), 100 mM HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.8. These crystals diffracted to a maximum of 5 Å. Crystal quality was improved through sequential runs of macro-seeding of LH3 crystals using the same crystallization mixture with slight variations in protein concentration. Co-crystallization experiments were performed by setting up the same seeding conditions, and supplementing the protein solution with mixtures of 500 μM FeCl2, 500 μM MnCl2, 1 mM UDP-galactose, 1 mM UDP-glucose (Supplementary Table 1). Crystals were cryo-protected with the mother liquor supplemented with 20% glycerol, harvested using MicroMounts Loops (Mitegen), flash-cooled and stored in liquid nitrogen prior to data acquisition. Heavy atom derivatives were prepared by soaking the LH3 crystals in mother liquor conditions containing 1 mM K2HgBr4. Crystals were incubated with the heavy atom solution for at least 5 h at 4 °C prior to cryo protection, harvesting and flash-cooling in liquid nitrogen.

Diffraction data collection and structure refinement

Diffraction data from LH3 crystals were collected at various beamlines of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France and at the Swiss Light Source, Villigen, Switzerland (details in Supplementary Table 1). Single wavelength Anomalous Dispersion (SAD) experiments at the Hg edge were performed at the ESRF ID30B beamline, whereas high multiplicity long-wavelength native SAD data (57 data sets of 360° from 6 different crystals) were collected at the SLS X06DA beamline as described elsewhere48. The data, which showed strong anisotropy (Supplementary Fig. 3), were processed with autoPROC49 including STARANISO50. Statistics are summarized in Suppl. table 1. Hg heavy atom sites were identified using SHELXC/D51 with the HKL2MAP GUI52. Experimental phasing with the Hg SAD data using SHELXE51 and SHARP53 yielded a partial model. Completion of the model could only be achieved by combining the latter with high multiplicity native SAD data using the CRANK2 pipeline54 followed by iterations of automatic and manual model building using BUCCANEER55 and COOT56. Subsequent LH3 structures were determined using the initial LH3 structural model in molecular replacement runs with PHASER57. Final 3D models were generated using iterations of automatic refinement using PHENIX58 alternated with manual adjustments using COOT56. Validation of structure quality was carried out with Molprobity59, the RCSB PDB Validation Server60, and PDB-CARE61. Final refinement statistics are listed in Suppl. Table 1. Structural figures were generated using PyMol62.

SAXS data collection and analysis

Solution scattering data were collected at ESRF BM29 using a sec−1 frame rate on Pilatus 1 M detector located at a fixed distance of 2.87 m from the sample, allowing a global q range of 0.03–4.5 nm with a wavelength of 0.01 nm. SEC-SAXS experiments were carried out using Nexera High Pressure Liquid/Chromatography (HPLC; Shimadzu) system connected online to SAXS sample capillary63. For these experiments, 50 μL of LH3 concentrated at 4 mg mL−1 were injected into a Superdex 200 PC 3.2/300 Increase column (GE Healthcare), pre-equilibrated with 25 mM HEPES/NaOH, 200 mM NaCl, pH 8.0. For offline batch sample analysis, 50 μL of LH3 at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 9 mg mL−1 were injected using the dedicated automatic sample changer available at the BM29 beamline64. For SEC-SAXS data, frames corresponding to LH3 protein peak were identified, blank subtracted and averaged using CHROMIXS65, whereas batch concentration series were analyzed using PRIMUS66. Radii of gyration (Rg), molar mass estimates and distance distribution functions P(r) were computed using the ATSAS package67 in PRIMUS66. Comparison of experimental SAXS data and 3D models from crystal structures was performed using CRYSOL68. A summary of SAXS data collection and analysis results is shown in Suppl. Table 3.

Determination of LH activity using mass spectrometry

Synthetic collagen peptides were purchased from China peptides. Peptides tested were ARGIKGIRGFS, GIKGIKGIKGIK, and IKGIKGIKG sequences. LH3 5 μM was incubated with 500 μM FeCl2, 1 mM 2-OG, 2 mM ascorbate and 1 mM peptide substrate. Reactions were allowed to proceed for 1 h at 37 °C. In total 20 μL of each sample were previously acidified by addition of 1 μL of formic acid (FA) and then analyzed on an LC–MS system (Thermo Finnigan, USA) consisting of a thermostated column oven Surveyor autosampler controlled at 25 °C; a quaternary gradient Surveyor MS pump equipped with an UV/vis detector and an Ion Trap (LCQ Advantage Max) mass spectrometer with electrospray ionization ion source controlled by Xcalibur software 2.0.7. Peptides were separated by RP-HPLC on a Jupiter (Phenomenex, USA) C18 column (150 × 2 mm, 4 μm, 90 Å particle size) using a linear gradient (2–60% solvent B in 60 min) in which solvent A consisted of 0.1% aqueous FA and solvent B of acetonitrile (CAN) containing 0.1% FA. Flow-rate was 0.2 mL/min. Mass spectra were generated in positive ion mode under constant instrumental conditions: source voltage 5.0 kV, capillary voltage 46 V, sheath gas flow 20 (arbitrary units), auxiliary gas flow 10 (arbitrary units), sweep gas flow 1 (arbitrary units), capillary temperature 200 °C, tube lens voltage −105 V. Spectra analyses were performed using Xcalibur software 2.0.7.

Biochemical evaluation of LH activity

Reaction mixtures (5 μL total volume) containing wild-type or mutant LH3 samples at 0.2 mg mL−1 were prepared by sequentially adding 0–1 mM peptide substrate or 4 mg mL−1 gelatin in water, (solubilized through heating denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min), 500 μM ascorbate, 100 μM 2-OG, and variable concentrations of FeCl2 (0–200 μM), and let incubate for 1 h at 37 °C. Reactions were stopped by heating samples at 95 °C for 2 min prior to transfer into Proxiplate white 384-well plates (Perkin-Elmer), then 5 μL of the Succinate-Glo reagent I (Promega) were added and let incubate 1 h at 25 °C, after that 10 μL of the Succinate-Glo reagent II (Promega) were added and let incubate 10 min at 25 °C. The plates were then transferred into a GloMax plate reader (Promega) configured according to manufacturer’s instructions for luminescence detection. All experiments were performed in triplicates. Control experiments were performed using identical conditions by selectively removing LH3, 2-OG or peptide substrates. Data were analyzed and plotted using the GraphPad Prism 7 software69.

Biochemical evaluation of GT and GGT enzymatic activities

Reaction mixtures (5 μL total volume) containing wild-type or mutant LH3 samples at 0.2 mg mL−1 were prepared by sequentially adding 0–1 mM peptide substrate, 500 μM ascorbate, 100 μM 2-OG, 50 μM FeCl2, and let incubate for 1 h at 37 °C. Reactions mixtures were then supplemented with 50 μM MnCl2, and 50μM UDP-Gal or UDP-Glc, and let incubate for 1 h at 37 °C. Experiments using gelatin as substrate were performed by sequentially adding 4 mg mL−1 gelatin in water, (solubilized through heating denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min), 50 μM MnCl2, and 100 μM UDP-Gal or UDP-Glc to the LH3 samples at 0.2 mg mL−1, and let incubate for 1 h at 37 °C. All reactions were stopped by heating at 95 °C for 2 min, prior to transfer into Proxiplate white 384-well plates (Perkin-Elmer), then 5 μL of the UDP-Glo luminescence detection reagent (Promega) were added and let incubate 1 h at 25 °C. Detection was carried out as described for the LH enzymatic activity. All experiments were performed in triplicates. Control experiments were performed using identical conditions by selectively removing LH3, donor or acceptor substrates. Data were analyzed and plotted using the GraphPad Prism 7 software69.

Surface-plasmon resonance

Wild-type and mutant LH3 preparations were immobilized onto a carboxymethylated dextran (CM5) sensor chip (GE Healthcare) using a mixed solution of 200 mM 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) in 50 mM N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) in a Biacore T200 SPR instrument (GE Healthcare). Excess reactive groups were blocked with 1 M ethanolamine. Efficient immobilization of LH3 samples was judged based on the SPR signal collected. For each of the tested samples, 3000 RU were reached. A control flow cell 1 was pre-activated and blocked using the same protocol as above but without protein samples, and used as reference cell during measurements. Collagen peptides were dissolved in running buffer (PBS-P 0.01%) and injected as two-fold dilution concentration series of eight points each using a flow of 5 μl min−1. Two replicates of each concentration were injected. Data analysis was performed using the Biacore T200 evaluation software (GE Healthcare) using a 1:1 steady-state affinity model.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with accession codes 6FXK, 6FXM, 6FXR, 6FXT, 6FXX, 6FXY. SEC-SAXS experimental data and ab-initio model have been deposited in Small Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank (SASBDB) with accession code SASDDW4. Other data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

  • 05 September 2018

    This Article was originally published without the accompanying Peer Review File. This file is now available in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF was correct from the time of publication.

  • 20 September 2018

    The previously published version of this Article contained an error in Figure 3. In panel a, the residues His667 and Asp669 were incorrectly labelled as His627 and Asp629. The error has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

References

  1. 1.

    Myllyharju, J. & Kivirikko, K. I. Collagens, modifying enzymes and their mutations in humans, flies and worms. Trends Genet. 20, 33–43 (2004).

  2. 2.

    Yamauchi, M. & Sricholpech, M. Lysine post-translational modifications of collagen. Essays Biochem. 52, 113–133 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Kivirikko, K. I., Ryhanen, L., Anttinen, H., Bornstein, P. & Prockop, D. J. Further hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen by protocollagen lysyl hydroxylase in vitro. Biochemistry 12, 4966–4971 (1973).

  4. 4.

    Puistola, U., Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T. M., Myllyla, R. & Kivirikko, K. I. Studies on the lysyl hydroxylase reaction. II. Inhibition kinetics and the reaction mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 611, 51–60 (1980).

  5. 5.

    Hautala, T. et al. Cloning of human lysyl hydroxylase: complete cDNA-derived amino acid sequence and assignment of the gene (PLOD) to chromosome 1p36.3→p36.2. Genomics 13, 62–69 (1992).

  6. 6.

    Rohrbach, M. et al. Phenotypic variability of the kyphoscoliotic type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS VIA): clinical, molecular and biochemical delineation. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 6, 46 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Hyry, M., Lantto, J. & Myllyharju, J. Missense mutations that cause Bruck syndrome affect enzymatic activity, folding, and oligomerization of lysyl hydroxylase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30917–30924 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Leal, G. F. et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum of phenotypes caused by pathogenic variants in PLOD2. J. Bone Miner. Res. 33, 753–760 (2018).

  9. 9.

    Ruotsalainen, H. et al. Glycosylation catalyzed by lysyl hydroxylase 3 is essential for basement membranes. J. Cell Sci. 119, 625–635 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Risteli, M. et al. Reduction of lysyl hydroxylase 3 causes deleterious changes in the deposition and organization of extracellular matrix. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28204–28211 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Salo, A. M. et al. A connective tissue disorder caused by mutations of the lysyl hydroxylase 3 gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 495–503 (2008).

  12. 12.

    van der Slot, A. J. et al. Identification of PLOD2 as telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase, an important enzyme in fibrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 40967–40972 (2003).

  13. 13.

    Du, H., Pang, M., Hou, X., Yuan, S. & Sun, L. PLOD2 in cancer research. Biomed. Pharmacother. 90, 670–676 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Gilkes, D. M. et al. Procollagen lysyl hydroxylase 2 is essential for hypoxia-induced breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer Res. 11, 456–466 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Chen, Y. L. et al. Lysyl hydroxylase 2 is secreted by tumor cells and can modify collagen in the extracellular space. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 25799–25808 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Ruotsalainen, H., Sipila, L., Kerkela, E., Pospiech, H. & Myllyla, R. Characterization of cDNAs for mouse lysyl hydroxylase 1, 2 and 3, their phylogenetic analysis and tissue-specific expression in the mouse. Matrix Biol. 18, 325–329 (1999).

  17. 17.

    Heikkinen, J. et al. Lysyl hydroxylase 3 is a multifunctional protein possessing collagen glucosyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36158–36163 (2000).

  18. 18.

    Wang, C. et al. The third activity for lysyl hydroxylase 3: galactosylation of hydroxylysyl residues in collagens in vitro. Matrix Biol. 21, 559–566 (2002).

  19. 19.

    Wang, C. et al. Identification of amino acids important for the catalytic activity of the collagen glucosyltransferase associated with the multifunctional lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18568–18573 (2002).

  20. 20.

    Kivirikko, K. I. & Myllyla, R. Posttranslational enzymes in the biosynthesis of collagen: intracellular enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 82, 245–304 (1982). Pt A.

  21. 21.

    Salo, A. M. et al. The lysyl hydroxylase isoforms are widely expressed during mouse embryogenesis, but obtain tissue- and cell-specific patterns in the adult. Matrix Biol. 25, 475–483 (2006).

  22. 22.

    Kellokumpu, S., Sormunen, R., Heikkinen, J. & Myllyla, R. Lysyl hydroxylase, a collagen processing enzyme, exemplifies a novel class of luminally-oriented peripheral membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30524–30529 (1994).

  23. 23.

    Heard, M. E. et al. Sc65-null mice provide evidence for a novel endoplasmic reticulum complex regulating collagen lysyl hydroxylation. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006002 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Duran, I. et al. A chaperone complex formed by HSP47, FKBP65, and BiP modulates telopeptide lysyl hydroxylation of Type I procollagen. J. Bone Miner. Res. 32, 1309–1319 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Gjaltema, R. A., van der Stoel, M. M., Boersema, M. & Bank, R. A. Disentangling mechanisms involved in collagen pyridinoline cross-linking: The immunophilin FKBP65 is critical for dimerization of lysyl hydroxylase 2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7142–7147 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Liefhebber, J. M., Punt, S., Spaan, W. J. & van Leeuwen, H. C. The human collagen beta(1-O)galactosyltransferase, GLT25D1, is a soluble endoplasmic reticulum localized protein. Bmc. Cell. Biol. 11, 33 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Salo, A. M. et al. Lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3) modifies proteins in the extracellular space, a novel mechanism for matrix remodeling. J. Cell. Physiol. 207, 644–653 (2006).

  28. 28.

    Wang, C., Ristiluoma, M. M., Salo, A. M., Eskelinen, S. & Myllyla, R. Lysyl hydroxylase 3 is secreted from cells by two pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 227, 668–675 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Watt, S. A. et al. Lysyl hydroxylase 3 localizes to epidermal basement membrane and is reduced in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. PLoS ONE 10, e0137639 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Banushi, B. et al. Regulation of post-Golgi LH3 trafficking is essential for collagen homeostasis. Nat. Commun. 7, 12111 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Gruber, R. et al. Autosomal recessive Keratoderma-Ichthyosis-Deafness (ARKID) syndrome is caused by VPS33B mutations affecting Rab protein interaction and collagen modification. J. Invest. Dermatol. S0022–202X, 32800–32807 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Myllyla, R. et al. Expanding the lysyl hydroxylase toolbox: new insights into the localization and activities of lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3). J. Cell. Physiol. 212, 323–329 (2007).

  33. 33.

    Gloster, T. M. Advances in understanding glycosyltransferases from a structural perspective. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 28, 131–141 (2014).

  34. 34.

    Lairson, L. L., Henrissat, B., Davies, G. J. & Withers, S. G. Glycosyltransferases: structures, functions, and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 521–555 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Aik, W., McDonough, M. A., Thalhammer, A., Chowdhury, R. & Schofield, C. J. Role of the jelly-roll fold in substrate binding by 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22, 691–700 (2012).

  36. 36.

    McDonough, M. A., Loenarz, C., Chowdhury, R., Clifton, I. J. & Schofield, C. J. Structural studies on human 2-oxoglutarate dependent oxygenases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 20, 659–672 (2010).

  37. 37.

    Pirskanen, A., Kaimio, A. M., Myllyla, R. & Kivirikko, K. I. Site-directed mutagenesis of human lysyl hydroxylase expressed in insect cells. Identification of histidine residues and an aspartic acid residue critical for catalytic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9398–9402 (1996).

  38. 38.

    Heikkinen, J. et al. Dimerization of human lysyl hydroxylase 3 (LH3) is mediated by the amino acids 541-547. Matrix Biol. 30, 27–33 (2011).

  39. 39.

    Guo, H. F. et al. Pro-metastatic collagen lysyl hydroxylase dimer assemblies stabilized by Fe(2+)-binding. Nat. Commun. 9, 512 (2018).

  40. 40.

    Gastinel, L. N. et al. Bovine alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase catalytic domain structure and its relationship with ABO histo-blood group and glycosphingolipid glycosyltransferases. EMBO J. 20, 638–649 (2001).

  41. 41.

    Wiggins, C. A. & Munro, S. Activity of the yeast MNN1 alpha-1,3-mannosyltransferase requires a motif conserved in many other families of glycosyltransferases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 7945–7950 (1998).

  42. 42.

    Passoja, K., Myllyharju, J., Pirskanen, A. & Kivirikko, K. I. Identification of arginine-700 as the residue that binds the C-5 carboxyl group of 2-oxoglutarate in human lysyl hydroxylase 1. FEBS Lett. 434, 145–148 (1998).

  43. 43.

    Koski, M. K. et al. The crystal structure of an algal prolyl 4-hydroxylase complexed with a proline-rich peptide reveals a novel buried tripeptide binding motif. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 25290–25301 (2009).

  44. 44.

    Ryhanen, L. & Kivirikko, K. I. Hydroxylation of lysyl residues in native and denatured protocollagen by protocollagen lysyl hydroxylase in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 343, 129–137 (1974).

  45. 45.

    Horita, S. et al. Structure of the ribosomal oxygenase OGFOD1 provides insights into the regio- and stereoselectivity of prolyl hydroxylases. Structure 23, 639–652 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Longbotham, J. E. et al. Structure and mechanism of a viral collagen prolyl hydroxylase. Biochemistry 54, 6093–6105 (2015).

  47. 47.

    Subramani, S., Mulligan, R. & Berg, P. Expression of the mouse dihydrofolate reductase complementary deoxyribonucleic acid in simian virus 40 vectors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 854–864 (1981).

  48. 48.

    Olieric, V. et al. Data-collection strategy for challenging native SAD phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 72, 421–429 (2016).

  49. 49.

    Vonrhein, C. et al. Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 67, 293–302 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Tickle, I. J. et al. STARANISO. (Global Phasing Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2018).

  51. 51.

    Sheldrick, G. M. Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 479–485 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. HKL2MAP: a graphical user interface for macromolecular phasing with SHELX programs. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 843–844 (2004).

  53. 53.

    Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M. & Paciorek, W. Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 59, 2023–2030 (2003).

  54. 54.

    Skubak, P. & Pannu, N. S. Automatic protein structure solution from weak X-ray data. Nat. Commun. 4, 2777 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Cowtan, K. The Buccaneer software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 (2006).

  56. 56.

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

  57. 57.

    McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

  58. 58.

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213–221 (2010).

  59. 59.

    Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010).

  60. 60.

    Gore, S. et al. Validation of structures in the protein data bank. Structure 25, 1916–1927 (2017).

  61. 61.

    Lutteke, T. & von der Lieth, C. W. pdb-care (PDB carbohydrate residue check): a program to support annotation of complex carbohydrate structures in PDB files. BMC Bioinf. 5, 69 (2004).

  62. 62.

    Schrodinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.3r1. (2010).

  63. 63.

    Brennich, M. E., Round, A. R. & Hutin, S. Online size-exclusion and ion-exchange chromatography on a SAXS beamline. J. Vis. Exp. 119,  e54861 (2017). 

  64. 64.

    Round, A. et al. BioSAXS Sample Changer: a robotic sample changer for rapid and reliable high-throughput X-ray solution scattering experiments. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 71, 67–75 (2015).

  65. 65.

    Panjkovich, A. & Svergun, D. I. CHROMIXS: automatic and interactive analysis of chromatography-coupled small angle X-ray scattering data. Bioinformatics 34, 1944–1946 (2017).

  66. 66.

    Konarev, P. V., Volkov, V. V., Sokolova, A. V., Koch, M. H. J. & Svergun, D. I. PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36, 1277–1282 (2003).

  67. 67.

    Franke, D. et al. ATSAS 2.8: a comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 1212–1225 (2017).

  68. 68.

    Svergun, D., Barberato, C. & Koch, M. H. J. CRYSOL - a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 768–773 (1995).

  69. 69.

    Graphpad Prism 7. (Graphpad Software, La Jolla, California, USA).

  70. 70.

    Jurrus, E. et al. Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite. Protein Sci. 27, 112–128 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank scientists at ARDIS S.R.L. Pavia for technical support during the SPR experiments. We thank the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) and the Swiss Light Source (SLS) for the provision of synchrotron radiation facilities and beamline scientists of the SLS, ESRF and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory for assistance. In particular, we would like to thank M. Brennich (EMBL Grenoble) and P. Pernot (ESRF) for support with SAXS data collection and analysis. We thank M. Miao for support in crystallization experiments and Prof. A. Mattevi for useful discussions. This work was supported by the Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Career Development Award, the “Programma Rita Levi-Montalcini” from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR), Cariplo Foundation Grant “COME TRUE” (id. 2015-0768), a “My First AIRC Grant” grant (Grant id. 20075) from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC), and by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR): Dipartimenti di Eccellenza Program (2018–2022)—Dept. of Biology and Biotechnology “L. Spallanzani”, University of Pavia. For X-ray diffraction experiments we were supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under BioStruct-X (Grant agreements 7551 and 10205). A.C. is supported by a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship from the Horizon 2020 EU Program (Grant agreement no. 745934 – COTETHERS). P.G. is supported by the NIHR HS&DR Programme (14/21/45) and supported by the NIHR GOSH BRC. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Author information

Author notes

    • Blerida Banushi

    Present address: Translational Research Institute, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, Australia

Affiliations

  1. The Armenise-Harvard Laboratory of Structural Biology, Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9/A, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    • Luigi Scietti
    • , Antonella Chiapparino
    • , Francesca De Giorgi
    •  & Federico Forneris
  2. Laboratory of Biochemistry, Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 3/B, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    • Marco Fumagalli
  3. Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Via Ferrata 9/A, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    • Lela Khoriauli
    • , Solomon Nergadze
    •  & Elena Giulotto
  4. Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, 5232, Switzerland

    • Shibom Basu
    •  & Vincent Olieric
  5. Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Pavia, Via Taramelli 12, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    • Lucia Cucca
    •  & Antonella Profumo
  6. MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    • Blerida Banushi
    •  & Paul Gissen
  7. UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK

    • Paul Gissen

Authors

  1. Search for Luigi Scietti in:

  2. Search for Antonella Chiapparino in:

  3. Search for Francesca De Giorgi in:

  4. Search for Marco Fumagalli in:

  5. Search for Lela Khoriauli in:

  6. Search for Solomon Nergadze in:

  7. Search for Shibom Basu in:

  8. Search for Vincent Olieric in:

  9. Search for Lucia Cucca in:

  10. Search for Blerida Banushi in:

  11. Search for Antonella Profumo in:

  12. Search for Elena Giulotto in:

  13. Search for Paul Gissen in:

  14. Search for Federico Forneris in:

Contributions

L.S., A.C., B.B., L.K., F.F. performed LH3 cloning and expression trials. L.K., S.N., and E.G. designed and implemented the stable HeLa cell lines for LH3 production. L.S. and F.F. purified and crystallized LH3, and solved its structure with help from S.B. and V.O. L.S. and F.F. carried out structural refinement. A.C. generated and purified LH3 mutants using HEK293 cells. L.S. and F.D.G. performed biochemical assays. M.F. performed mass spectrometry experiments. L.C. and A.P. performed ICP-MS metal ion identification experiments. L.S. performed surface-plasmon resonance measurements. F.F. designed the study with help from B.B. and P.G. L.S., A.C., F.D.G., and F.F. analyzed the data and prepared figures. L.S., A.C. and F.F. wrote the paper, with contributions from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Forneris.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05631-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.