Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Aerosol trace metal leaching and impacts on marine microorganisms


Metal dissolution from atmospheric aerosol deposition to the oceans is important in enhancing and inhibiting phytoplankton growth rates and modifying plankton community structure, thus impacting marine biogeochemistry. Here we review the current state of knowledge on the causes and effects of the leaching of multiple trace metals from natural and anthropogenic aerosols. Aerosol deposition is considered both on short timescales over which phytoplankton respond directly to aerosol metal inputs, as well as longer timescales over which biogeochemical cycles are affected by aerosols.


The world’s oceans represent a mosaic of diverse but interconnected biogeochemical provinces that cycle elements, support organismal growth and regulate global climate.Marine microorganisms are responsible for approximately half of Earth’s primary productivity, the process that converts carbon dioxide into organic molecules via photosynthesis and chemosynthesis, while at the same time replenishes the oxygen supply. This primary productivity supports the vast biodiversity and fisheries of the ocean. Primary producers like phytoplankton require nutrients to support their growth, and the nutrient in shortest supply relative to cellular requirements limits primary production. Historically, the macronutrients nitrogen (N) and, to a lesser extent phosphorus (P) have been identified as limiting nutrients in the oceans1,2. More recently, the role of iron (Fe) in marine biogeochemical cycles as a growth-limiting nutrient for the phytoplankton community in the high nitrate, low chlorophyll (HNLC) regions, located in the Southern Ocean and the equatorial and subarctic Pacific, has been identified (Fig. 1a). Numerous in situ iron fertilization experiments have demonstrated increased growth rates, shifts in community composition, and biomass accumulation with iron addition3,4. While other biologically important trace metals do not typically limit productivity to the same extent as iron, as enzyme co-factors they play important roles in determining which enzymes cells can express, modifying microbial community composition and biogeochemistry5. Regions where some microbial biogeochemical activity is limited or co-limited by one or more trace metal micronutrients including zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), and manganese (Mn) have been reported6,7,8. In contrast, some metals, such as copper (Cu) can be toxic at high concentrations to some plankton, and thus additions of some trace metals modifies community composition and inhibits biological productivity9,10.

Fig. 1

Estimate of iron limitation regions and sources of soluble iron. Estimate of ocean iron limitation regions for diatoms, small phytoplankton, and diazatrophs, based on an ocean biogeochemistry model161 (a, b); iron is limiting for small phytoplankton (light mauve); iron is limiting for diazotrophs and small phytoplankton (purple); iron is limiting for small phytoplankton, diatoms, and diazatrophs (deep purple); iron is limiting for diazatrophs (gray-blue); iron is limiting for diatoms and diazatrophs (blue). This is shown for the current climate (a), and in the current climate with no atmospheric deposition of iron (b). See Supplementary Figure 1 for more information. Overall, most of the world’s ocean depend on atmospheric iron inputs. Diazotrophs are not present in the model at high latitudes where temperatures are below ~15 °C. The solid yellow line represents the mean location of this temperature control on the diazotrophs. Model-based source apportionment (c) for soluble iron deposition into the oceans using R. Scanza et al. (manuscript in preparation) and ref.160. The dominant source for each region is identified by color (North Africa: dark blue; East Asia: light green; North America: pink; Australia: yellow; South Africa: red, South America: green). If the soluble iron is contributed substantially from two source regions, the colors are mixed with the dominant source providing the base color, and the secondary source the points. In regions where one source dominates, but the dominant source is not dust, but combustion, black diagonal stippling is applied (in the Southern Hemisphere, near Africa, South America and Micronesia)

Atmospheric deposition of leachable metals can represent an important source of metals to the open ocean, in conjunction with other sources. Atmospheric aerosols are solids or liquids suspended in the atmosphere, and have diverse sources, sizes, and chemical composition11. Desert dust eroded from dry, unvegetated regions during strong wind events, is by mass one of the most important aerosols, and dominates as the source of many important trace metals. However, only a small fraction of metals in desert dust are soluble and available to the ocean biota12,13. For example, studies have suggested that although most of the total iron is contained in dust, much of the soluble (bioavailable) iron derives from combustion sources of iron14,15, even in the remote Southern Ocean16. There is also evidence that the iron in dust is processed by acids in the atmosphere to become more soluble17. Because humans are increasing combustion emissions of metals to the atmosphere18, contributing to atmospheric acidity, and potentially causing an increase in desert dust emissions due to land use and climate change, anthropogenic activities are likely to be increasing the deposition of soluble metals, especially iron, to the ocean19. In the HNLC areas, there is a direct link between atmospheric iron inputs and biological production and carbon export20,21 (Fig. 1a). Some phytoplankton (diazatrophs) are capable of nitrogen fixation22, and they are often growth-limited by the availability of iron or phosphorus in the oligotrophic ocean regions where the other phytoplankton are nitrogen-limited23,24 (Fig. 1a). Thus, deposition of soluble iron can impact rates of nitrogen fixation and community carbon export23,24, although at times, the impacts of iron deposition will be delayed25. Aerosol nutrient inputs can influence the biological export rates above the ocean oxygen minimum zones, thereby influencing rates of water column denitrification26. Thus, both nitrogen fixation and denitrification are modified by atmospheric nutrient inputs, and iron availability critically modifies the dynamic feedbacks between these key nitrogen cycle fluxes and the carbon cycle27,28 (Fig. 1a). Over longer timescales, the input of nutrients from the atmosphere strongly impacts the large-scale patterns of nutrient limitation and biological productivity in the oceans (Fig. 1b). Our understanding of aerosol metal leaching and the resulting impacts on ocean biota has experienced substantial improvements in recent years. This review addresses the important couplings between aerosol metals and ocean biology. First, the sources of metals to the atmosphere and atmospheric processing of these metals is presented. Then the short and long-term impacts of this on ocean biogeochemistry are discussed, as well as the best steps forward to improve our understanding of aerosol-biota interactions. Two boxes supplement this information with a discussion of new observational methods for aerosols and ocean metals, and another box focusing on the solubility of aerosols.

Sources of aerosol metals

Available estimates suggest that the aerosol sources of metals are dominated by desert dust (mineral aerosols) for Al, Ti, Mn, and Fe, but combustion sources may also contribute to those elements and may be especially important for Cu, Zn, Pb, while Cd sources may be dominated by volcanoes (Fig. 2; Fig. 3a; Table 1). There are limited studies looking at the atmospheric cycle of metals besides iron, and, except for iron and copper, there has not been a comparison of model predictions of metal distributions with observations (Fig. 4a, c), and so these aerosol source budgets must be considered uncertain (Table 1; Fig. 3a). Once airborne, coagulation of aerosol particles and the condensation of low volatility gases onto particle surfaces results in a continuing evolution of the particles’ composition29,30. Deposition to the ocean can occur via direct (dry) deposition through gravitational or turbulent mixing of the particle, or through rain-out (wet deposition) after the particle has become entrained within a precipitating cloud droplet (Fig. 2). Comparisons with available observations suggest that even for metals like Cu, with substantial anthropogenic sources (Fig. 3a), ocean regions downwind from the desert dust sources of North Africa will experience high atmospheric inputs (Fig. 4a, e). Volcanoes can be important sources during explosive events31, and for Cd generally, but quiescent volcanoes generally represent only locally important sources for metals (Table 1).

Fig. 2

Schematic of aerosol metal dissolution and impacts on the ocean. Metal-bearing aerosols are emitted from natural (mineral dust, volcanoes, biological particles, and biomass burning) and anthropogenic activities (industrial combustion, agriculture, and land conversion), mostly over land. Combustion sources tend to have more soluble metals than the larger mineral dust sources. Some of the aerosols are transported to ocean regions, and can become processed so that the metals are more soluble by acids, photochemical and/or cloud processes, before being deposited to the oceans. In the oceans, the metals in the particles experience different chemical conditions, and can become more or less soluble, due to changes in acidity and ligands, for example. The metals can be cycled through bacteria, phytoplankton and zooplankton, and/or sink through the ocean to be scavenged in the deep ocean, or be deposited into the sediment. Sedimentary sources, riverine inputs, and hydrothermal vents can be important for many metals, as sources of new metals in the oceans

Fig. 3

Variations in aerosol metal composition, solubility, and evolution. a Estimates of the percent of the atmospheric source for different metals; b estimates of the mass percentage of different metals in dust concentrations, from observations and model simulations in dust storm events (from ref. 35). c Measurements of metal solubility from ocean cruises with standard deviations shown as error bars12,36. d Measurements of iron solubility and pH (blue) as a function of travel time from the source region from ocean cruise (data taken from ref. 44)

Table 1 Aerosol metal sources to the atmosphere
Fig. 4

Spatial distribution of metals in aerosols. Distribution of iron concentrations (R. Scanza et al. (manuscript in preparation) and ref. 160) (a), iron solubility (R. Scanza et al. (manuscript in preparation) and ref. 160) (c), and copper concentrations10 (e) in models and observations. Iron solubility in measurements in the atmospheric aerosols (a) and modeled values (b), and scatter plot comparing the observations versus the model for total iron (b), solubility of iron (d), and copper (f). Vertical bars in b, d represent one standard deviation above and below the annual mean values, based on daily averages within a chemical transport model. The mean and standard deviation are calculated in log-normal space, as the distribution of the values is closer to a log-normal distribution than a Gaussian distribution161

The magnitude of dust emissions is related to vegetation cover, the soil characteristics (including particle size, composition, and moisture content) and prevailing meteorological conditions32. Subsequent long range transport of dust to the open ocean is well documented in marine observations, and some of the earliest observations were made by Charles Darwin over a century ago33. Dust emission, transport, and deposition events are highly episodic in nature, with 30–90% of annual average dust deposition occurring over just 5% of the days of a year32. The amount of metals in crustal material and soils is highly variable by element type (Fig. 3b), and for different elements can vary by region due to the different geological influences34, and thus vary in desert dust from different regions35 (Supplementary Figure 1). For example, there is more Al than Fe in most dust regions (Fig. 3b). The solubility of aerosol metals is also important when considering the potential biological impacts of deposition (see Boxes 1 and 2 for more discussion of solubility). Observations over ocean regions suggest quite different solubilities for different metals, with iron tending to be less soluble than many other metals, such as Mn or Co, but more soluble than Ti36,37 (Box 1; Fig. 3c). The variability in metal solubility is likely to be driven by both variability in sources and atmospheric processing (Box 2). Indeed, there is evidence that combustion sources of aerosols may be much more soluble than dust sources, so although their total elemental emissions may be small, combustion emissions of metals may supply more bioavailable metals than dust, especially in regions with high emissions (Tables 1 and 2; Box 2).

Table 2 Soluble metal emissions

The most studied metal in aerosols is iron, as it is known to be a limiting micro-nutrient. The largest concentrations of iron are observed downwind of the major desert regions (Fig. 3a), similar to Cu (Fig. 4e). However, only a fraction (0.1–90%) of the iron in aerosols is soluble when deposited to the open ocean (Fig. 3c; Box 2), with relatively low solubilities observed close to the desert dust sources, and higher solubilities in remote or polluted regions when iron concentrations are low, although there is substantial temporal and spatial variability (Fig. 4c; Box 2). This variability of iron solubility is likely to be due to three main factors: the aerosol source, atmospheric processing, and the characteristics of the receiving sea water (Fig. 2; Box 2).

Anthropogenic fossil fuel combustion and biomass burning activity has created a new source of combustion Fe to the atmosphere, while wildfires present a natural source of combustion Fe14 (Table 1). Although emissions of combustion Fe are 1–2 orders of magnitude smaller than mineral dust Fe (Table 1), they could account for up to 50% of the total soluble Fe deposited in remote HNLC ocean regions15 (Fig. 1c) and be important globally (Table 2). The spatial distribution of Fe emissions from fossil fuel combustion, anthropogenic biomass burning, and wildfires contrasts with that of dust15 reflecting underlying patterns in human population density, shipping, and vegetation distributions. Shipping contributes a relatively small (~2%) source of Fe38; however, the solubility of oil combustion-derived Fe is significantly higher (36–81%) compared to coal (0.2–25%)39. Shipping-derived Fe is largely deposited in the nearby oceans and is therefore a significant source (up to 50%) of bioavailable soluble Fe for remote northern hemisphere and equatorial Pacific HNLC ocean regions40. Observations of Fe from wildfires are limited and emissions are currently based on estimated Fe:black carbon ratios14,41. Modeling suggests that over the southern hemisphere fires represent a significant source of soluble Fe, which could be equal to that from mineral dust (Fig. 1c). Present day Fe emissions from fires are estimated to be approximately double those of industrial combustion Fe emissions24, but could increase to an order of magnitude larger in the future as fire occurrence increases and industrial emission decrease42. Observed solubilities of Fe from fires range from 0.5-46% 14,43, reflecting a significant source of uncertainty in their impacts on soluble Fe deposition.

Atmospheric processing and deposition of metals

Aerosol metal solubility is influenced by atmospheric processes that occur before aerosol particles are deposited on the ocean surface. These atmospheric processes can be quite variable across different metals; however, most studies have focused on iron. In remote regions, the solubility of iron can be quite high (Fig. 3b), and observations suggest that under some circumstances iron solubility in dust increases as it travels downwind44 (Fig. 3d). Several chemical mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increase in solubility. Many studies have shown that increases in acidity (decreases in pH) will result in more iron being solubilized17. Studies have highlighted the role that anthropogenic pollution can play in solubilizing iron17,19. Aerosol water can become very acidic because of the low volatility of sulfate and organic acids and thus may promote some chemical reactions converting metals to a more soluble state44. The presence of organic compounds, such as oxalate, in cloud water can promote photo-reduction45 and could increase iron solubility by up to an additional 75% compared to just acidic dissolution46. On the other hand, dust can partially buffer acids, for example, if calcium carbonate is present within the particle47. Some observations suggest that wet-deposited iron tends to be more soluble13, and may lead to increased productivity once deposited in the oceans48. This may be because of in-cloud acid processing17 or because organic ligands may stabilize soluble metals once dissolved in cloud drops45. The chemical composition of aerosols likewise changes as the size distribution shifts toward smaller particles, with larger, less soluble dust aerosols giving way to smaller, more soluble combustion aerosols (see Box 2 for more discussion).

The complexity of explaining observed metal solubility in aerosol concentrations and deposition can be illustrated by the better studied Fe example, although metal chemical behavior can be hetereogeneous49,50. No single process has been identified as the dominant controlling factor for Fe aerosol solubility, and it is likely that combinations of competing factors are important depending on the region and season. The observed inverse relationship between amount and solubility of iron (and other metals)12 can be explained through any of the above mechanisms (Box 2). From the spatial distribution, one can see that the lowest solubilities occur close to the dust source regions (Fig. 5c), but there is substantial variability in the observed solubility even at nearby locations. Models can simulate much of the spatial variability in solubility, but cannot reproduce the very high solubilities sometimes observed. (Fig. 4c, d). Model results suggest that single daily averaged observations are difficult to use to constrain the solubility, since there is considerable temporal variability in the solubility and the amount of iron at a specific location (Fig. 4c; Box 2) (R. Scanza et al. (manuscript in preparation) and ref. 38,42). While acid processing is hypothesized to increase soluble iron, there is rarely correlation in the observations between acid concentrations (e.g., sulfate) and iron solubility; however, modeling studies have shown that even if the only mechanism for the production of soluble iron is sulfate processing, because of the need for time to solubilize the iron, there is no correlation15 (Box 2), suggesting that this lack of correlation is not helpful in constraining the source of soluble iron in the atmosphere. Model calculations suggest that for most ocean basins, the upwind dust source is the dominant source of soluble iron (Fig. 1c). It is important to note that the dominant sources of total iron are different than the dominant sources of soluble iron, and that in the Southern Hemisphere, combustion sources may dominate over dust sources for soluble iron (Fig. 1c; Box 2). A new potentially transformational method of determining the source of iron or other metals is isotopic analysis, which could discriminate between combustion and dust sources52, in addition to using spatial variability in models and observations (Fig. 4d).

Fig. 5

Ocean dissolution processes. a Elemental molar fractions of metals in bulk aerosol material collected In Eilat, Israel along the coast of the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, and in the sea water-soluble fractions after 10 min and 7 days of leaching. Metals are arranged from most to least abundant based on the abundance in the bulk aerosol. Data were published previously in Mackey et al.74; see reference for sample collection and methodological details. b Three dissolution modes were observed for different metals. Gradually dissolving metals show increased dissolved concentrations over time, whereas nearly all soluble metal is released immediately for rapidly dissolving metals. For particle reactive metals, the dissolved concentrations first increase but then decrease due to sorption onto particles and/or wall loss. c Schematic of the percent change in soluble concentration of several aerosol metals over time based on measurements after 10 min and 7 days of leaching. Positive values (above the horizontal line) indicate more metal dissolves with longer leaching (gradual dissolution), while negative values (below the horizontal line) indicate declining concentrations with time (particle reactive). Values near zero indicate rapid dissolution where the concentration of dissolved metal remains relatively constant over time

Global synthesis of estimated sources, modeled distributions, and comparison to observations, which would allow for a rigorous assessment of the atmospheric budget have only occurred for Fe and Cu53 (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 4). However, the high quality of the available data (Box 1), with interesting spatial patterns35 and potentially large anthropogenic sources (Table 1), suggest more studies should occur.

Short-term impacts of aerosol metal deposition to the ocean

Once aerosols are deposited on the ocean surface, dissolution of the metals is influenced by the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the receiving body of water. Metal dissolution can be either instantaneous or gradual, with Zn, Co, and Cd dissolving faster than other metals, and Ni, Al, Cu, and Mn dissolving slower54 (Fig. 5, Box 1). Fe and Pb tend to react strongly in water, showing an increase and then loss of dissolved metal (Fig. 5). Mixing and resuspension of particles within the water column increases their residence times, hence the particles have more time to interact with the water and for metals to dissolve, with smaller particles residing longer. The pre-existing concentration of the metal organic matter within the water also influences the rate of dissolution of additional metal from the particle55,56. For example, the majority of dissolved iron in the oceans is bound to iron-binding ligands or bound to colloids57,58. Sidephores are one ligand type produced by bacteria and are classified as strong binding ligands due to their high-conditional stability constants59,60. Weaker binding ligands in the upper water column have sources from remineralization of sinking organic matter25, the rupture of phytoplankton cells by viral lysis61,62, and zooplankton grazing63. Deeper water column ligand sources are thought to include refractory, humic-like substances25,64,65,66. The relative importance of these sources and sinks of metal-binding organic matter are unknown. As the understanding of the importance of trace metals other than Fe for biota has been documented in recent years, the role of ligands in controlling their distributions, inventories, and speciation in the ocean has gained recognition. Metals like cobalt67,68 and copper69,70 are examples of biologically important trace metals with speciation controlled by biogenic ligands. In the case of copper, ligand production may serve the dual purpose of maintaining adequate levels of free Cu for nutrition, while simultaneously preventing free Cu concentrations from reaching toxic levels.

In addition to ligand production, biota can influence metal dissolution directly via the processing of particles in their (acidic) vacuoles and guts, and by repackaging particles into fecal pellets, which affects the sinking rate and hence the amount of time the particle stays in the mixed layer71. Uptake of trace metals during growth can likewise have a strong effect on dissolved trace metal concentrations, which can become depleted in the water as they are taken up by cells. For example, phytoplankton have been shown to take up aerosol-derived trace metals like Fe, Co, Ni, and Mn rapidly over a period of days, drawing down their concentrations in sea water70. The extent to which biological uptake affects a given metal depends on the cellular quota for that metal, which varies among species and strains, and which can vary considerably within a species depending on availability of the metal72. For example, some cells have the ability to perform luxury uptake and storage of metals during periods of high availability. This has been observed for Fe, which Trichodesmium73 and Synechococcus74 both possess mechanisms to store within their cells for later use. Other removal processes from the ocean mixed layer include the scavenging (adsorption) onto sinking particles75. Both biological and physical removal processes scale positively with ocean productivity (most particles are biogenic) with rapid removal in productive regions.

Bottle incubation experiments were critical in first demonstrating that iron was the growth-limiting nutrient over the vast HNLC regions, which was verified by the subsequent larger-scale, in situ iron fertilization experiments3,4. Often, aerosol additions stimulate one or more populations by providing growth-limiting nutrients (Fig. 6; Box 1). This occurs because populations can be limited by different nutrients depending on cellular quotas and physiological requirements. Bottle incubation experiments have been used to identify differences in nutrient (co)limitation between communities in coastal versus offshore waters70,76, along open ocean transects77,78, over different seasons79, and among sites with varying amounts of anthropogenic influence80. For example, aerosol-derived Co, Mn, and Ni supported growth of oceanic (but not coastal) Synechococcus in the Sargasso Sea. Moreover, in both coastal and oceanic populations, moderate aerosol copper additions did not cause toxicity, and the production of Cu-binding ligands following aerosol Cu additions could indicate a nutritive role for Cu in the region. Most phytoplankton taxa appear capable of benefitting from aerosol-derived nutrients depending on their location and nutrient status. Indeed, diatoms, dinoflagellates, prymnesiophytes, picoplankton, diazotrophs, and heterotrophic bacteria have all been shown to respond favorably to aerosols in different locations (Supplementary Table 2). Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass in the Western Philippine Sea had high concentrations of several trace metals (Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu), which was attributed to the high anthropogenic aerosol deposition in the region81.

Fig. 6

Biological responses of phytoplankton and bacteria to aerosol trace metals. Trace metals are required as co-factors for many biogeochemically important molecules. Certain aerosol trace metals (a) have been shown to stimulate production of nitrogenase73,77, alkaline phosphatase91 and metal-binding ligands70,95,162, and these molecules may remain within the cells (proportion of helix which is green) or be exuded into the sea water (b), where they catalyze chemical reactions that influence biogeochemical cycles (c). The cycling of N, P, and trace metals in turn affects the carbon cycle by influencing cellular growth rates. See Supplementary table 2 for compilation of studies, which this figure syntheses

Diazotroph responses to aerosol additions are well studied due to the essential role of these cells in the marine nitrogen cycle as providers of new bioavailable nitrogen. Most studies focus on the effects of aerosol Fe, because the nitrogenase enzyme that catalyzes nitrogen fixation has a high Fe requirement. Many genera have been observed to benefit from aerosol additions, including Trichodesmium spp.73,82 and unicellular cyanobacteria77, although the response is geographically variable. For example, in the ultraoligotrophic Southeast Pacific Ocean, N2 fixation was not enhanced by aerosol additions due to the very low abundance of diazotrophs at the site78, and in many locations of the Mediterranean Sea, N2 fixation is spurred by aerosol P rather than aerosol Fe83,84. These studies have also contributed to our understanding of how phytoplankton access Fe in the environment. Trichodesmium performs luxury uptake of Fe that is in excess of its cellular requirement following aerosol additions7, and has been shown to trap and move dust particles within its trichomes to accelerate dissolution and facilitate uptake82.

Recent studies have begun to focus on the responses of heterotrophic bacteria following aerosol additions. As with phytoplankton, changes in heterotroph abundances and bacterial production rates following aerosol additions are site specific. In the majority of cases, the heterotrophic response to aerosols are stronger85,86,87,88,89 than the autotrophic response, although one study reported a weaker response90. Aside from measuring microorganisms themselves, some bottle incubation studies quantify important biogenic enzymes or molecules that microbes synthesize in response to aerosol additions (Fig. 6). In many cases, these products influence major biogeochemical cycles. Nitrogenase is one such example, as it plays an essential role in the nitrogen cycle, since it catalyzes nitrogen fixation. The phosphorus cycle is likewise sensitive to aerosol metals because the alkaline phosphatase enzymes responsible for cleaving phosphate groups from organic molecules utilize iron or zinc as co-factors. Addition of iron and zinc from aerosols has been shown to stimulate alkaline phosphatase activity in the North Atlantic Ocean91, although the effect is less pronounced in the eastern Atlantic, presumably due to the considerably higher amount of Saharan dust and associated metals already present in the water92. Similarly, alkaline phosphatase activity is not enhanced in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea, which receives high levels of dust deposition93. Finally, metal-binding ligand production can be measured in bottle incubation experiments to assess the role of biota in modulating dissolved metal concentrations following aerosol enrichment (Fig. 6). For example, Cu- binding ligand concentrations were observed to change over a period of days during an incubation in the Sargasso Sea94, and increased iron dissolution over time in a Mediterranean Sea mesocosm study was attributed to ligand production during phytoplankton growth95,96 (though Fe-binding ligands were not directly measured in those studies). Studies that quantify ligand concentrations and stability constants during incubations are still rare, possibly due to the highly specialized methodology required, but necessary for future progress in understanding the trace metal cycling.

In addition to increasing our understanding of the fertilizing effects of aerosols on marine microbes and their biogeochemical activity, bottle incubation experiments have also been instrumental in demonstrating the potential toxic and interactive effects that aerosol metals may have on phytoplankton growth and community composition. For example, Mann et al.97 proposed that the differential copper toxicity thresholds and depth distributions among Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus ecotypes in the North Atlantic Ocean was driven by the higher dust-derived Cu concentrations in surface waters. The role of aerosol Cu as a toxicant was later empirically confirmed through bottle incubation experiments in the Red Sea, where picoeukaryotes and Synechococcus populations declined when aerosol Cu exceeded their toxicity threshold10, and in the South China Sea, where Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus populations declined following the strongest deposition event80. Later studies used a combination of bottle incubation experiments, remote sensing, and direct aerosol sampling to show that phytoplankton copper toxicity from aerosols in the East China Sea was mitigated when aerosols contained a higher proportion of iron98. Both the toxicity of copper and its mitigation by other metals like iron and manganese had been well studied using laboratory cultures, but the bottle incubation experiments demonstrated their role in natural populations. Mesoscale enclosures (mesocosms) of ambient sea water allow for manipulation of environmental conditions and nutrient inputs, and the study of larger-scale processes than bottle incubations, including more realistic food web dynamics and interaction with grazers and the export of sinking material95,99. The effect of iron from Saharan dust has been assessed via direct measurement in the high deposition eastern North Atlantic Ocean100, as well as in the more moderate deposition western North Atlantic101.

Remote sensing of aerosol optical thickness has been used to explore the longer term impacts of atmospheric deposition on phytoplankton in the Mediterranean Sea9, coastal California102, and Chinese marginal Seas103. However, an important caveat is that satellite ocean color errors are correlated with atmospheric aerosols104, and aerosols observed in the atmosphere are not the same aerosols that are deposited in the ocean105. In addition, it is difficult to tease apart whether the observed response results from N, iron, or other micronutrients in the aerosol. Because of these difficulties, as well as the longer timescales of the effects of atmospheric deposition, it may be difficult to detect and attribute responses to trace metal deposition in remotely sensed data25.

Long-term biogeochemical impacts of aerosol metal deposition

The large-scale distributions of other key trace metals with atmospheric sources are providing insights into the magnitude of atmospheric sources, the roles of trace metals in biogeochemistry, and the potential for limitation or co-limitation of phytoplankton growth by cobalt80,106,107, manganese6,80,108, zinc107,109,110, and potentially other trace metals111 (Box 1; Fig. 6). Strong biological drawdown of zinc in Southern Ocean surface waters can reduce the northward flux into the thermocline of the South Atlantic gyre, which likely selects for plankton with lower Zn requirements110. Contrasting observations from the North and South Atlantic basins strongly suggests that biological uptake drives the low surface values in the North Atlantic, and that Zn and/or Co availability can limit the ability of plankton to utilize organic phosphorus via alkaline phosphatase enzymes, which require these metal co-factors106,107. Volcanic ash was suggested to enhance productivity more than iron-only additions due to relief of manganese co-limitation6. The growing global observational database for manganese has facilitated the development of initial model simulations of the global marine manganese cycle108.

Efforts to include the influence of atmospheric trace metal deposition into marine ecosystem and biogeochemical models remain largely focused on iron deposition (Table 1). These efforts are hampered by large uncertainties in the magnitude of dissolved iron inputs from different sources, and a still-limited understanding of the interactions with the iron-binding ligands that dictate the losses to particle scavenging (Fig. 2; Table 3). A recent inter-comparison of global-scale, marine iron cycle models revealed a great disparity in the magnitude of iron inputs to the ocean from different sources across the models112 (Table 3). Atmospheric deposition of soluble iron to the oceans ranged from 1.4 to 32.7 Gmol/year, with even larger variability in the assumed inputs from sedimentary sources. Atmospheric deposition and marine sediments have been recognized as important sources of dissolved iron, but there is still great uncertainty as to their relative contributions to the open ocean. Some evidence suggests atmospheric deposition is an important contributor to metal concentrations in the regions of the ocean where the biological demands are greatest21,113,114. Recent observations from the GEOTRACES program illustrate the importance of hydrothermal vent systems as a major deep ocean source for iron and other trace elements115. In addition to these three major dissolved Fe sources, inputs from river, glacier, iceberg, sea ice, and volcanic ash sources can be important regionally31,116,117, although they are not important globally (Table 3). Mn ocean sources are estimated to be dominated by hydrothermal vents108 (Table 3). While reviews are available across multiple metals5, budgets for other metals are not available (Table 3). Nutrient concentrations may increase notably in response to a single deposition event, which can then influence species composition and productivity, both for phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria118,119. While large changes in deposition are likely on daily to decadal scales, models used in the Fifth Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) included only monthly averaged, climatological Fe deposition, which suggests they underestimated the potential biogeochemical impacts of changing deposition with climate change120.

Table 3 Metal sources to the ocean

There is variability in phytoplankton trace metal quotas for different trace metals77,121. Thus, the stoichiometry of the trace metals and macronutrients in atmospheric deposition may modify community composition by differentially supporting different species80,121. For example, in the Caribbean Sea near Barbados, an area of intense deposition, nitrogen and iron levels are consistently elevated relative to phosphorus. This selects for a population dominated by Prochlorococcus, which has lower phosphorus requirements relative to other phytoplankton, and that is efficient at taking up the ammonium released from the aerosols122. In contrast, in the Equatorial Pacific HNLC, low-dust deposition coupled with relatively low dissolved iron concentrations in upwelled water create an intense iron deficit that favors microbial populations capable of performing vigorous iron recycling to fuel the high observed nitrate consumption rates123.

The availability of trace metals over evolutionary timescales may place a selective pressure on microorganisms to evolve novel adaptations for acquiring, utilizing, and/or avoiding toxicity from trace metals, and these effects can manifest in individual species or strains, as well as at the community and ecosystem levels. In the North Atlantic Ocean, the pattern of Saharan dust deposition establishes a gradient with consistently high iron concentrations in the east and lower latitudes, and more variable iron concentrations in the west. This gradient in iron availability has been linked to the retention and expression of iron acquisition, storage, and regulatory proteins in Synechococcus, where a strain from the variable western region has more genetic flexibility to respond to changes in iron availability74. A related strain from the consistently high deposition region lacks this flexibility, likely because it imparts no selective advantage given the relatively consistent iron supply, and because retaining these proteins/genes requires nitrogen and phosphorus in an environment where these elements scarce and often co-limiting. Similarly, Prochlorococcus from the iron-limited Equatorial Pacific HNLC region minimizes iron requirements through genomic streamlining in which iron-containing metalloenzymes are eliminated from the genome124. Oceanic diatoms from iron-limited regions receiving low-dust deposition have likewise adapted genetically by utilizing copper rather than iron for certain essential proteins125, and alkaline phosphatase activity in the North Atlantic Ocean has been linked to aerosol iron and zinc deposition91,92, as these metals are co-factors in the alkaline phosphatase enzyme.

Aerosol metal deposition and leaching under future climates

Because of increases in anthropogenic emissions of combustion iron and acids, modeling suggests that soluble iron deposited to the oceans has increased by a factor of 2–3 since the pre-industrial era19,38,42. Despite clean air acts reducing anthropogenic gas emissions, calculated pH levels from observed continental aerosols has remained constant at between 0 and 2 over the last 15 years126, suggesting that acid dissolution processes will remain an import process in controlling the availability of soluble Fe to the oceans into the future, even with stricter air pollution regulations. In addition, desert dust may have almost doubled over the 20th century, due to land use and/or climate change19. Thus, large changes in soluble iron inputs to the ocean are likely to have occurred. Future soluble iron deposition is uncertain depending on the relative importance of dust, combustion iron, and acidity, and their potential changes38,42. No projections are currently available for other metals, but estimates of the anthropogenic component of the atmospheric sources (Table 1), suggest that many metals may be heavily modified by humans18,127, and large changes may occur in the future. Ocean acidification has the potential to alter metal sea water chemistry, resulting in changes to the dissolution rate of metals within the ocean column128.

Despite these sources of uncertainty, several trends are expected to emerge as the surface ocean warms in response to climate change. Increased thermal stratification, particularly at mid and high latitudes, will cause the mixed layer depth to shoal, which could increase the concentrations of aerosol-derived metals in surface waters. However, this process would be less pronounced at low latitudes where aerosol (from dust) flux is highest, due to a more modest shoaling of the mixed layer in the tropics. All of the CMIP5 ocean biogeochemical models projected consistent patterns of increasing sea surface temperature and stratification, and declining ocean productivity over the 21st century under strong warming scenarios129. As the upper ocean warms and stratifies, the upward nutrient flux declines, and global-scale net primary production and the biological export of carbon to the ocean interior consistently decreased across the models129,130. The reduced nutrient flux from below will increase the relative importance atmospheric nutrient inputs to the oceans.

The effect of toxicity from the potential increase in surface metal concentrations has not been explored in models because iron is currently the only trace metal that is routinely included in model simulations, and iron does not exceed toxicity thresholds in sea water. However, the projected range expansion of small phytoplankton like Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus, which have the highest sensitivity to trace metals like copper10,131, suggests that the increase in surface water metal concentrations could lead to metal toxicity in more areas of the ocean in the future. This effect would be heightened if anthropogenic aerosol emissions increase, due to their higher trace metal content and solubility.

Future perspectives

In this review, we have synthesized available observations of aerosol metals deposited in ocean (Fig. 2), their potential to be leached in oceans (Fig. 5), their short-term impacts on ocean biota (Fig. 6), and their long-term impacts on ocean biogeochemistry (Fig. 1a, b; Box 1). There is substantial literature on many important metals including Al, Ti, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Cd, and Pb. Many of these metals have seen a substantial increase in their atmospheric sources due to anthropogenic activities (Fig. 3a; Table 1a), but only Fe has been extensively studied (Fig. 1). Once deposited into the ocean, metal concentrations from leaching behave hetereogeneously, depending on the chemical and biological interactions with ocean water (Fig. 5). Recent studies suggest important nutrient and toxicity effects from many aerosols (Fig. 6).

Although there has been substantial progress in understanding the role of aerosol metal leaching and the impact on the ocean biota, there are many open questions. We propose the following four main areas of research. First, continued improvement in measurement methods is required. For example, the development of more robust methods of observing deposition, both wet and dry, would facilitate understanding of aerosol metals: currently one can only infer deposition rates from atmospheric or ocean concentrations, or use ocean sediment traps, which are situated sometimes 1000 m below the surface and allow substantial downstream advection and processing within the ocean. Another example is the use of metal isotopes to provide unique constraints on the sources and sinks of metals in the atmosphere and ocean52. Secondly, there is a need to establish more long-term timeseries stations measuring aerosols, and their impact on the oceans. These studies would provide insights into source and sink processes, allow for detailed studies of the marine ecosystem dynamics influenced by episodic aerosol deposition, and provide a baseline for detecting changes over time driven by climate. Thirdly, model and data should be combined to provide budgets for ocean and atmospheric sources, including three-dimensional modeling and synthesis work. In addition, synthesizing modeling efforts are needed to better capture the impacts on marine ecosystems and biogeochemistry of aerosol trace metal deposition over a wide range of timescales, from a single deposition event to the large changes associated with glacial/interglacial cycles. Finally, much of the current work has focused on iron, but there are hints within the literature of the potential for other metals to be catalysts or inhibitors for ocean biogeochemistry, which should be explored. These studies need to include not just the nutrient effects from aerosols but also potential toxicity effects.


Atmospheric metal sources

Values in Fig. 3a and Table 1 were compiled using the sparse data available within the literature, and hence contain large uncertainties in their fluxes. The majority of anthropogenic metal emission values are the sum of all reported anthropogenic activities (major contributing sectors: fossil fuel combustion, metal production, cement production, and waste disposal)132. Al and Fe, not reported in that study, are given as the emission from anthropogenic combustion activity only, and hence likely represent an underestimate of their atmospheric emission fluxes. Emissions for Fe and Al were derived as follows: Fe emission values have been developed and compared to observations15 and Al emissions are then derived using a Al/Fe emission ratio of 4.6 calculated as the average of the anthropogenic emissions measured in one study133). Natural metal emissions are given separately for each major natural source: deserts and soils, vegetation fires, vegetation emissions (primary biological particles and if reported secondary volatile emissions), oceans (primary particles and if reported marine biogenic sources), and volcanoes. Dust emissions are calculated by multiplying the crustal emission of Al (tuned to observations)35 with a crustal composition ratio of metal/Al134. Dust emissions of Fe and Mn are then further tuned to observations35. For all other natural sources, the emissions of Al, Cu, Fe, Pb, and Zn are taken from135, except Fe emissions from fires which is from15, while emissions of Cd and Mn are from earlier estimates127. Emission estimates of Ti are the most limited within the literature and are reported here only for natural dust and fire sources. Dust Ti emissions were estimated using Ti/Fe ratio (0.0957) from West Africa wet deposition136. Fire Ti emissions were estimated using the emission factor (Ti/fine particulate matter = 0.043)137 multiplied by the same study’s estimate of emissions fine particulate matter, but this method represents a tropical fire emission contribution only.

Copper sources are slightly different between the values shown in the global summary127 versus those used for the three-dimensional modeling study53, as the latter did not include metal smelting because estimates for the location and production are not available, but these sources are thought to be important127.

Methods for Box 2

There are two plausible ways to obtain an inverse relationship, where Fe is the amount of the Fe, sFe is soluble iron amounts, and PsFe is the percentage soluble amount of Fe.

First, we start by considering the case where the iron has a continental source, and is advected downwind, as well as being removed by wet and dry deposition. If we assume a constant lifetime due to deposition(td), at an advection speed (u), we can obtain an e-folding length scale for the concentration of Fe (Dd = u × td) and the iron amounts in equilibrium will evolve with distance downwind (x) from the initial plume (Fe(xo)):

This is a simple first-order loss term (dFe(x)):

$${\mathrm{dFe}}(x) = - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}x}}}{{{D}_{\mathrm{d}}}} \times {\mathrm{Fe}}(x),$$

which has the analytical solution:

$${\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right) = {\mathrm{Fe}}\left( 0 \right) \times {\mathrm{exp}}\left(\frac{{ - x}}{{{D}_{\mathrm{d}}}}\right).$$

In the case of combustion iron emission, we consider that there is no atmospheric processing, but rather two types of aerosols emitted: one that is coarse has a shorter lifetime, and lower solubilities, and another which is fine mode, higher solubility and longer lifetime (an example is combustion iron, but it could also be any highly processed fine mode aerosol).

We use Eq. (1) for the Fe(x) function as before, but now assume that all the solubility is in the fine particles (Fef(x)), which have on average a solublity of S, and a lifetime of tf, or a spatial e-folding decay rate of Df = u × tf, giving us a change in Fef(x) (dFef).

$${\mathrm{dFe}}_{\mathrm{f}} = - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{f}}}} \times {\mathrm{Fe}}_{\mathrm{f}}\left( x \right) = > \ {\mathrm{dsFe}}\left( x \right) = - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{f}}}} \times S \times {\mathrm{Fe}}_{\mathrm{f}}(x).$$

The analytical solution for Eq. (3) is:

$${\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right) = S \times {\mathrm{Fe}}_{\mathrm{f}}\left( 0 \right) \times {\mathrm{exp}}\left(\frac{{ - x}}{{D_{\mathrm{f}}}}\right).$$

Total iron is the sum of the fine and coarse mode, but assume that almost all the iron is in the coarse mode:

$${\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right) = {\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right) + {\mathrm{Fe}}_{\mathrm{f}}\left( x \right).$$

The percentage of soluble iron (PsFe(x)) is equal to:

$${\mathrm{PsFe}}\left( x \right) = \frac{{{\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right)}}{{{\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right)}} \times 100 = \frac{{S \times {\mathrm{Fe}}_{\mathrm{f}}\left( 0 \right) \times {\mathrm{exp}}(\frac{{ - x}}{{D_{\mathrm{f}}}})}}{{{\mathrm{Fe}}\left( 0 \right) \times {\mathrm{exp}}(\frac{{ - x}}{{D_{\mathrm{c}}}})}}.$$

If simple atmospheric processing of dust takes place, we can assume a first-order chemical reaction process converting insoluble iron (iFe) to soluble iron (sFe) at a rate k (where the timescale of conversion (tc) is 1/k or k = 1/tc). Similar to the above, we can convert the temporal scale to a spatial scale of chemical conversion (Dc) using the mean winds (u): Dc = u × tc.

We can then calculate the amount of soluble iron produced when traveling between point x and point x + ∆x, farther downwind, and it will be a function of how much insoluble iron (iFe(x) = Fe(x) − sFe(x)) and the conversion distance scale (Dc). In addition, there is a loss of the solubilized Fe dust with a spatial scale of Dd, and we assume that 1% of the dust iron is soluble at the source on average.

$${\mathrm{dsFe}}\left( x \right) = + \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{c}}}} \times ({\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right) - {\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right)) - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{d}}}} \times {\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right).$$

If the atmospheric processing of dust takes place preferentially by land-based emissions of acids (with a concentration of P(x); for example, sulfate or oxalate acids), we can add this into Eq. (7). We need to make the chemical reaction dependent on the acidity, which should be lost as the plume moves away from the source in an equation similar to Eq. (1), with a temporal scale (tp) and spatial scale (Dp = u × tp):

$${\rm d}{P}\left( x \right) = - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{p}}}} \times {P}\left( x \right).$$

The analytical solution for Eq. (8) is:

$$P\left( x \right) = P\left( 0 \right) \times {\mathrm{exp}}\left(\frac{{ - x}}{{D_{\mathrm{p}}}}\right).$$

If we add a dependence on P into Eq. (7), we can obtain:

$${\mathrm{dsFe}}\left( x \right) = + \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{c}}}} \times \exp \left( { - \frac{x}{{D_{\mathrm{p}}}}} \right) \times ({\mathrm{Fe}}\left( x \right) - {\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right)) - \frac{{{\mathrm{d}}x}}{{D_{\mathrm{d}}}} \times {\mathrm{sFe}}\left( x \right).$$

The coefficients used in Box 2 are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Data availability

The datasets used in this paper are available by request to the corresponding author and available at


  1. 1.

    Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T. & Smetacek, V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281, 200–206 (1998).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Moore, C. M. M. et al. Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nat. Geosci. 6, 701–710 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    de Baar, H. J. W. et al. Synthesis of iron fertilization experiments: from the Iron Age in the Age of Enlightenment. J. Geophys. Res. 110, C09S16 (2005). Important synthesis of our understanding of nutrient limitation in the ocean.

  4. 4.

    Boyd, P. W. et al. Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993-2005: synthesis and future directions. Science 315, 612–617 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Boyd, P., Ellwood, M., Tagliabue, A. & Twining, B. Biotic and abiotic retention, recycling and remineralization of metals in the ocean. Nat. Geosci. 10, 167–173 (2017). Review of remineralization cycles within the ocean for metals.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Browning, T. et al. Strong responses of Southern Ocean phytoplankton communities to volcanic ash. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2851–2857 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Saito, M., Goepfert, T. & Ritt, J. Some thougths on the concept of colimitation: three definitions and the importance of bioavailability. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 276–290 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ahlgren, N. A. et al. The unique trace metal and mixed layer conditions of the Costa Rica upwelling dome support a distinct and dense community of Synechococcus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 2166–2184 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jordi, A., Basterretxea, G., Tovar-Sanchez, A., Alastuey, A. & Querol, X. Copper aerosols inhibit phytoplankton growth in the Mediterranean Sea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21246–21249 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Paytan, A. et al. Toxicity of atmospheric aerosols on marine phytoplankton. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4601–4605 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mahowald, N. et al. Aerosol impacts on climate and biogeochemistry. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36, 45–74 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Sholkovitz, E. R., Sedwick, P. N., Church, T. M., Baker, A. R. & Powell, C. F. Fractional solubility of aerosol iron: synthesis of a global-scale data set. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 89, 173–189 (2012). Synthesis of observations showing inverse relationship between solubility of iron and iron amounts in the atmosphere.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jickells, T. & Spokes, L. in Biogeochemistry of Iron in Seawater Vol. 7 (eds Turner, D. R. & Hunteger, K.) 85–121 (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2001).

  14. 14.

    Guieu, C., Bonnet, S., Wagener, T. & Loye-Pilot, M.-D. Biomass burning as a source of dissolved iron to the open ocean? Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, L19608 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Luo, C. et al. Combustion iron distribution and deposition. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1012 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Winton, W. et al. Fractional iron solubility of atmosperic iron inputs to the Southern Ocean. Mar. Chem. 177, 20–32 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Meskhidze, N., Chameides, W. & Nenes, A. Dust and pollution: a recipe for enhanced ocean fertilization? J. Geophys. Res. 110, (2005).

  18. 18.

    Pacyna, J. M. & Pacyna, E. G. An assessment of global and regional emissions of trace metals to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources worldwide. Environ. Rev. 9, 269–298 (2001). Globally averaged assessment of trace metals in aerosols from anthropogenic sources.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mahowald, N. M. M. et al. Observed 20th century desert dust variability: impact on climate and biogeochemistry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 10875–10893 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Martin, J., Gordon, R. M. & Fitzwater, S. E. The case for iron. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1793–1802 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tagliabue, A. et al. The integral role of iron in ocean biogeochemistry. Nature 543, 51–59 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Capone, D., Zehr, J., Paerl, H., Bergman, B. & Carpenter, E. Trichodesmium, a globallly significant marine cyanobacterium. Science 276, 1221–1229 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mills, M. M., Ridame, C., Davey, M., La Roche, J. & Geider, R. J. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature 429, 292–294 (2004).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Moore, K., Doney, S. C., Lindsay, K., Mahowald, N. & Michaels Anthony, F. A. F. Nitrogen fixation amplifies the ocean biogeochemical response to decadal timescale variations in mineral dust deposition. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 58, 560–572 (2006).

  25. 25.

    Boyd, P. W., Mackie, D. S. & Hunter, K. A. Aerosol iron deposition to the surface ocean — modes of iron supply and biological responses. Mar. Chem. 120, 128–143 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ito, A., Nenes, A., Johnson, C. E., Meskhidze, N. & Deutsch, C. Acceleration of oxygen decline in the tropical Pacific over the past decades by aerosol pollutants. Nat. Geosci. 9, 443–448 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Moore, J. K. & Doney, S. C. Iron availability limits the ocean nitrogen inventory stabilizing feedbacks between marine denitrification and nitrogen fixation. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB2001 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Somes, C., Landolfi, J., Koeve, W. & Oschilies, A. Limited impact of atmospherric nitrogen depositoin on marine productivity due to biogeochemical feedbacks in a global ocean mode. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 4500–4509 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shi, Z. et al. Impacts on iron solubility in the mineral dust by processes in the source region and the atmosphere: a review. Aeolian Res. 5, 21–42 (2012). Review of source atmospheric processing mechanisms that lead to more soluble iron in the atmosphere.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Seinfeld, J. H. & Pandis, S. N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change 2nd edn (Wiley, Chichester, 2006).

  31. 31.

    Frogner, P., Gislason, S. R. & Oskarsson, N. Fertilizing potential of volcanic ash in ocean surface water. Geol. Soc. Am. 29, 487–490 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mahowald, N. M. et al. Atmospheric iron deposition: global distribution, variability, and human perturbations. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 245–278 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Darwin, C. An account of the fine dust which often falls on vessels in the Atlantic Ocean. Q. J. Geol. Soc. 2, 26–30 (1846).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Claquin, T., Schulz, M. & Balkanski, Y. Modeling the mineralogy of atmospheric dust sources. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 22,222–243,256 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Modeling the global emission, transport and deposition of trace elements associated with mineral dust. Biogeosciences 12, 5771–5792 (2015). Study which resolved the spatial variability in elemental distributions in dust.

  36. 36.

    Baker, A. R., Adams, C., Bell, T. G., Jickells, T. D. & Ganzeveld, L. Estimation of atmospheric nutrient inputs to the Atlantic Ocean from 50°N to 50°S based on large-scale field sampling: iron and other dust-associated elements. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 755–767 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Baker, A., Laskina, O. & Grassian, V. in Mineral Dust: A Key player in the Earth System (eds Knippertz, P. & Stutt, J.-B) 75–92 (Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 2014).

  38. 38.

    Ito, A. & Shi, Z. Delivery of anthropogenic bioavailable iron from mineral dust and combustion aerosol to the ocean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 85–2016 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Desboeufs, K. V., Sofikitis, A., Losno, R., Colin, J. L. & Ausset, P. Dissolution and solubility of trace metals from natural and anthropogenic aerosol particulate matter. Chemosphere 58, 195–203 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ito, A. Atmospheric processing of combustion aerosols as a source of bioavailable iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2, 70–75 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ito, A. Mega fire emissions in Siberia: potential supply of bioavailable iron from forests to the ocean. Biogeosciences 8, 1679–1697 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Myriokefalitakis, S. et al. Changes in dissolved iron deposition to the oceans driven by anthropogenic activitity: a 3-D global modeling study. Biogeosciences 12, 3973–3992 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Paris, R., Desboefs, K., Formenti, P., Nava, S. & Chou, C. Chemical characterisation of iron in dust and biomass burning aerosols during AMMA-SOP0/DABEX: implication for iron solubility. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 4273–4282 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Longo, A. et al. Influence of atmospheric processes on the solubility and composition of iron in Saharan dust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 6912–6920 (2016).

  45. 45.

    Paris, R., Desboeufs, K. V. & Journet, E. Variability of dust iron solubility in atmospheric waters: investigation of the role of oxalate organic complexation. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6510–6517 (2011). Measurements which show the importance of the organic organic complexation for iron solubility in dust.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Johnson, M. & Meskhidze, N. Atmospheric dissolved iron deposition to the global oceans: effects of oxalate-promoted Fe dissolution, photochemical redo cycling and dust mineralogy. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 1137–20130 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Formenti, P. et al. Recent progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and Asian mineral dust. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 8231–8256 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schlosser, C. et al. Seasonal ITCZ migration dynamically controls the location of the (sub)tropical Atlantic biogeochemical divide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1438–1442 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Baker, A. R. & Croot, P. L. Atmospheric and marine controls on aerosol iron solubility in seawater. Mar. Chem. 120, 4–13 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jickells, T., Boyd, P. & Hunter, K. in Mineral Dust: A Key player in the Earth System (eds Knippertz, P. & Stutt, J.-B.) 284–359 (Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, 2014).

  51. 51.

    Conway, T. M. & John, S. G. Quantification of dissolved iron sources to the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 511, 212–215 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Paytan, A. et al. Toxicity of atmospheric aerosols on marine phytoplankton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4601–4605 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Mackey, K. R. M., Chien, C.-T. & Paytan, A. Microbial and biogeochemical responses to projected future nitrate enrichment in the California upwelling system. Front. Microbiol. 5, 632 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Gledhill, M. & Buck, K. N. The organic complexation of iron in the marine environment: a review. Front. Microbiol. 3, 69 (2012).

  55. 55.

    Bundy, R., Jiang, M., Carter, M. M. & Barbeau, K. Iron-binding ligands in the Southern California Current System: mechanistic studies. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 27 (2016).

  56. 56.

    Boiteau, R. M. et al. Siderophore-based microbial adaptations to iron scarcity across the eastern Pacific Ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14237–14242 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Buck, K. N., Sohst, B. & Sedwick, P. N. The organic complexation of dissolved iron along the U.S. GEOTRACES (GA03) North Atlantic Section. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 116, 152–165 (2015).

  58. 58.

    Butler, A. Marine siderophores and microbial iron mobilization. Biometals 18, 369–374 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hider, R. C. & Kong, X. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27, 637–657 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Witter, A. E., Hutchins, D. A. & butler, A. Determination of conditional stability constants and kinetic constans for strong model Fe-binding ligands in seawater. Mar. Chem. 69, 1–17 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Vong, L., Laes, A. & Blain, S. Determination of iron-porphyrin-like complexes at nanomolar levels in seawater. Anal. Chim. Acta 588, 237–244 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Sato, M., Takeda, S. & Furuya, K. Iron regeneration and organic iron (III)-binding ligand production during in situ zooplankton grazing experiment. Mar. Chem. 106, 471–488 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Misumi, K. et al. Humic substances may control dissolved iron distributions in the global ocean: implications from numerical simulations. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 450–462 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Laglera, L. M. & van den Berg, C. M. G. Evidence for geochemical control of iron by humic substances in sea water. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 610–619 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Batchelli, S., Muller, F., Chang, K.-S. & Lee, C. Evidence for strong but dynamic iron-humic colloidal associations in humic-rich coastal water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 8485–8490 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Saito, M. A. & Moffett, J. W. Complexation of cobalt by natural organic ligands in the Sargasso Sea as determined by a new high-sensitivity electrochemical cobalt speciation method suitable for open ocean work. Mar. Chem. 75, 49–68 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Saito, M. A., Rocap, G. & Moffett, J. W. Production of cobalt binding ligands in a Synechococcus feature at the Costa Rica upwelling dome. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 279–290 (2005).

  68. 68.

    Buck, K. N. et al. The organic complexation of iron and copper: an intercomparison of competitive ligand exchange-adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-ACSV) techniques. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 10, 496–515 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Enhanced solubility and ecological impact of atmospheric phosphorus deposition upon extended seawater exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 10438–10446 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Schmidt, K. et al. Zooplankton gut passage mobilizes lithogenic iron for ocean productivity. Curr. Biol. 26, 2667–2673 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Twining, B. S. & Baines, S. B. The trace metal composition of marine phytoplankton. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 5, 191–215 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chen, Y., Tovar-Sanchez, A., Siefert, R. L., Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A. & Zhuang, G. Luxury uptake of aerosol iron by Trichodesmium in the western tropical North Atlantic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L18602 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Divergent responses of Atlantic coastal and oceanic Synechococcus to iron limitation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9944–9949 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Honeyman, B. D., Balistrieri, L. S. & Murray, J. W. Oceanic trace metal scavenging: the importance of particle concentration. Deep Sea Res. A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 35, 227–246 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Atmospheric and fluvial nutrients fuel algal blooms in the East China Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 2 (2017).

  76. 76.

    Langlois, R., Mills, M., Ridame, C., Croot, P. & La Roche, J. Diazotrophic bacteria respond to Saharan dust additions. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 470, 1–14 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Bonnet, S. et al. Nutrient limitation of primary productivity in the Southeast Pacific (BIOSOPE cruise). Biogeosciences 5, 215–225 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Foster, R. A., Paytan, A. & Zehr, J. P. Seasonality of N2 fixation and nifH gene diversity in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 219–233 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Guo, C. et al. Dynamics of phytoplankton community structure in the South China Sea in response to the East Asian aerosol input. Biogeosciences 9, 1519–1536 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Liao, W.-H., Yang, S.-C. & Ho, T.-Y. Trace metal composition of size-fractionated plankton in the Western Philippine Sea: the impact of anthropogenic aerosol deposition. Limnol. Oceangr. 62, 2243–2259 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Rubin, M., Berman-Frank, I. & Shaked, Y. Dust- and mineral-iron utilization by the marine dinitrogen-fixer Trichomesmium. Nat. Geosci. 4, 529–534 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ridame, C. et al. Nutrient control of N2 fixation in the oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea and the impact of Saharan dust events. Biogeosciences 8, 2773–2783 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Ridame, C., Guieu, C. & L’Helguen, S. Strong stimulation of N2 fixation in oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea: results from dust addition in large in situ mesocosms. Biogeosciences 10, 7333–7346 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Marañon, E. et al. Degree of oligotrophy controls the response of microbial plankton to Saharan dust. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55, 2339–2352 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Herut, B. et al. Response of East Mediterranean surface water to Saharan dust: on-board microcosm experiment and field observations. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 52, 3024–3040 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Romero, E. et al. Coastal Mediterranean plankton stimulation dynamics through a dust storm event: an experimental simulation. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 93, 27–39 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Maki, T. et al. Effects of Asian dust (KOSA) deposition event on bacterial and microalgal communities in the Pacific Ocean. Asian J. Atmos. Environ. 5, 157–163 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Lekunberri, I. et al. Effects of a dust deposition event on coastal marine microbial abundance and activity, bacterial community structure and ecosystem function. J. Plankton Res. 32, 381–396 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Duarte, C. M. et al. Aerosol inputs enhance new production in the subtropical northeast Atlantic. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 111, G04006 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Mahaffey, C., Reynolds, S., Davis, C. E. & Lohan, M. C. Alkaline phosphatase activity in the subtropical ocean: insights from nutrient, dust and trace metal addition experiments. Front. Mar. Sci. 1, 73 (2014).

  91. 91.

    Browning, J. et al. Iron limitation of microbial phosphorus acquisition in the tropical North Atlantic. Nat. Commun. 8, 15465 (2017).

  92. 92.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Phosphorus availability, phytoplankton community dynamics, and taxon-specific phosphorus status in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 873–885 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Phytoplankton responses to atmospheric metal deposition in the coastal and open-ocean Sargasso Sea. Front. Microbiol. 3, 359 (2012).

  94. 94.

    Guieu, C., Dulac, F., Ridame, C. & Pondaven, P. Introduction to project DUNE, a DUst experiment in a low Nutrient, low chlorophyll Ecosystem. Biogeosciences 11, 425–442 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wuttig, K., Heller, M. I. & Croot, P. L. Reactivity of inorganic Mn and Mn desferrioxamine B with O2, O2−, and H2O2 in seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10257–10265 (2013).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Mann, E. L., Ahlgren, N., Moffett, J. W. & Chisholm, S. W. Copper toxicity and cyanobacteria ecology in the Sargasso Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 976–988 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Wang, F. J. et al. Combined effects of iron and copper from atmospheric dry deposition on ocean productivity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2016GL072349 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Bressac, M. et al. Quantification of the lithogenic carbon pump following a simulated dust-deposition event in large mesocosms. Biogeosciences 11, 1007–1020 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Neuer, S. et al. Dust deposition pulses to the eastern subtropical North Atlantic gyre: does ocean’s biogeochemistry respond? Global Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4020 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Moore, C. M. et al. Iron limits primary productivity during spring bloom development in the central North Atlantic. Global Chang. Biol. 12, 626–634 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Mackey, K. R. M. et al. Influence of atmospheric nutrients on primary productivity in a coastal upwelling region: upwelling and atmospheric nutrients. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB4027 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Wang, S.-H. et al. Can Asian dust trigger phytoplankton blooms in the oligotrophic northern South China Sea? Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L05811 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Gordon, H. R. Atmospheric correction of ocean color imagery in the Earth Observing System era. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17081–17106 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Mahowald, N., Luo, C., del Corral, J. & Zender, C. S. Interannual variability in atmospheric mineral aerosols from a 22-year model simulation and observational data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 108, 4352 (2003).

  105. 105.

    Shelley, R. U., Wyatt, N. J., Rees, A. P. & Worsfold, P. J. A tale of two gures: contrasting distributions of dissolved cobalt and iron in the Atlantic Ocean during an Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT-19). Prog. Oceanogr. 158, 52–64 (2016).

  106. 106.

    Saito, M. et al. The acceleration of dissolved cobalt’s ecological stoichiometry due to biological uptake, remineralization, and scavenging in the Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosciences 14, 4637–4662 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    van Hulten, M. et al. Manganese in the western Atlantic ocean in the context of the first global ocean circulation model of manganese. Biogeosciences 14, 1123–1152 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Kim, T., Obata, H., Nishioka, J. & Gamo, T. Distribution of dissolved zinc in the western and central subarctic North Pacific. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 1454–1468 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Wyatt, N. J. et al. Biogeochemical cycling of dissolved zinc along the GEOTRACES South Atlantic transect GA10 at 40°S. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 44–56 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Pinedo-González, P. et al. Surface distribution of dissolved trace metals in the oligotrophic ocean and their influence on phytoplankton biomass and productivity. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 1763–1781 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Tagliabue, A. et al. How well do global ocean biogeochemistry models imulate dissolved iron distributions? Global Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 149–174 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Moore, J. K. & Braucher, O. Sedimentary and mineral dust sources of dissolved iron to the world ocean. Biogeosciences 5, 631–656 (2008).

  113. 113.

    Tagliabue, A., Aumont, O., & Bopp, L. The impact of different external sources of iron on the global carbon cycle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 920–926 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Resing, J. A. et al. Basin-scale transport of hydrothermal dissolved metals across the South Pacific Ocean. Nature 523, 200–203 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Raiswell, R. et al. Potentially bioavailable iron delivery by iceberg-hosted sediments and atmospheric dust to the polar oceans. Biogeosciences 13, 3887–3900 (2016).

  116. 116.

    Rijkenberg, M. et al. The distribution of dissolved iron in the West Atlantic Ocean. PLoS ONE 9, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Guieu, C. et al. The significance of the episodic nature of atmospheric deposition to the low nutrient low chlorophyll regimes. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 38, 1179–1198 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Maki, T. et al. Atmospheric aerosol deposition influences marine microbial communities in oligotrophic surface waters of hte weatern Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Res. A Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 118, 37–45 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Mahowald, N. et al. Desert dust and anthropogenic aerosol interactions in the Community Climate System Model coupled-carbon-climate model. Biogeosciences 8, 387–414 (2011).

  120. 120.

    Ramos, J. et al. Nutrient-specific responses of a phytoplankton community: a case study of the North Atlantic Gyre, Azores. J. Plankton Res. 39, 744–761 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Chien, C.-T. et al. Effects of African dust deposition on phytoplankton in the western tropical Atlantic Ocean off Barbados. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 716–734 (2016).

  122. 122.

    Rafter, P., Sigman, D. & Mackey, K. Recycled iron fuels new primary production in the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Nat. Commun 8, 1100 (2017).

  123. 123.

    Rusch, D. B., Martiny, A. C., Dupont, C. L., Halpern, A. L. & Venter, J. C. Characterization of Prochlorococcus clades from iron-depleted oceanic regions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16184–16189 (2010).

  124. 124.

    Peers, G. & Price, N. Copper-containing plastocyanin used for electronic transport by an oceanic diatom. Nature 441, 341–344 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Weber, R., Guo, H., Russel, A. & Nenes, A. High aerosol acidity despite declining atmospheric sulfate concentrations over the past 15 years. Nat. Geosci. 9, 282–286 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Nraigu, J. A global assessment of natural sources of atmospheric trace metals. Nature 338, 47049 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Doney, S., Fabry, V., Feely, R. & Kleypas, J. Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 169–192 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Bopp, L. et al. Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: projections with CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 10, 6225–6245 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Fu, W., Randerson, J. & Moore, J. K. Climate change impacts on net primary production (NPP) and export production (EP) regulated by increasing stratification and phytoplankton community structure in the CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 13, 5151–5170 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Brand, L. E., Sunda, W. G. & Guillard, R. R. L. Reduction of marine phytoplankton reproduction rates by copper and cadmium. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 96, 225–250 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Pacyna, J. & Pacyna, E. An assessment of global and regional emissions of trace metals to the atmospere from anthropogenic sources worldwide. Environ. Rev. 9, 269–298 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Olmez, I. et al. Compositions of particles from selected sourcesin philadelphia for receptor modeling applications. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 38, 1392–1402 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Pye, K. Aeolian Dust and Dust Deposits (Academic Press, London, 1987).

  134. 134.

    Rauch, J. & Pacyna, J. Earth’s global Ag, Al, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn cycles. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB2001 (2009).

  135. 135.

    Desboefs, K. et al. Chemistry of rain events in West Africa: evidence of dust and biogenic influence in convective systems. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 9283–9298 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Yamasoe, M., Artaxo, P., Miguel, A., & Allen, A. Chemical composition of aerosol particles from direct emissions of vegetation fires in the Amazon Basin: water-soluble species and trace elements. Atmos. Environ. 34, 1641–1653 (2000).

  137. 137.

    Cutter, G. A. Intercalibration in chemical oceanography—getting the right number. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 11, 418–424 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Gerringa, L., Rijkenberg, M., Schoemann, V., Laan, P. & de Baar, H. Organic complexation of iron in the West Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Chem. 177, 434–446 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Twining, B., Rauschenberg, S., Morton, P. & Vogt, S. Metal contens of phytoplankton and labile particulate material in the North Atlantic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 137, 261–283 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Anderson, R. F. et al. How well can we quantify dust deposition to the ocean? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 374, 20150285 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Hayes, C. T. et al. Intensity of Th and Pa scanvenging partitioned by particle chemistry in the North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Chem. 170, 49–60 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Hayes, C., Rosen, J., McGee, D. & Boyle, E. Thorium distribution in high- and low-dust regions and the significant for iron supply. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 328–347 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Fitzsimmons, J. et al. Daily to decadal variaiblity of size-fractionated iron and iron-binding ligands at the Hawaii Ocean time-series station ALOHA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 171, 303–324 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Schallenberg, C., Ross, A. R., Davidson, A. B., Stewart, G. M. & Cullen, J. Temporal variability of dissolved iron species in the mesopelagic zone at Ocean Station PAPA. J. Mar. Syst. 172, 128–136 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Chen, Y., Street, J. & Paytan, A. Comparison between pure-water- and seawater-soluble nutrient concentrations of aerosols from the Gulf of Aqaba. Mar. Chem. 101, 141–152 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Morton, P. et al. Methods for sampling and analysis of marine aerosols: results from the 2008 GEOTRACES aerosol intercalibration experiment,. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 11, 62–78 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Sunda, W. & Huntsman, S. Effect of pH, light, and temperature on Fe–EDTA chelation and Fe hydrolysis in seawater. Mar. Chem. 84, 35–47 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Kraemer, S. M. Iron oxide dissolution and solubility in the presence of siderophores. Aquat. Sci. 66, 3–18 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Liu, X. & Millero, F. The solubility of iron in seawater. Mar. Chem. 77, 43–54 (2002).

  150. 150.

    Heller, M. I. & Croot, P. L. Superoxide decay as a probe for speciation changes during dust dissolution in Tropical Atlantic surface waters near Cape Verde. Mar. Chem. 126, 37–55 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Aguilar-Islas, A. M., Wu, J., Rember, R., Johansen, A. M. & Shank, L. M. Dissolution of aerosol-derived iron in seawater: leach solution chemistry, aerosol type, and colloidal iron fraction. Mar. Chem. 120, 25–33 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Buck, C., Landing, W. M., Resing, J. A. & Lebon, G. Aerosol iron and alumninum solubility in the northwest Pacific Ocean: results from the 2002 IOC Cruise. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, (2006).

  153. 153.

    Mackey, K. R. M., Chien, C.-T. C.-T., Post, A. F., Saito, M. A. & Paytan, A. Rapid and gradual modes of aerosol trace metal dissolution in seawater. Front. Microbiol. 5, 1–11 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Schlitzer, R. eGEOTRACES - Electronic Atlas of GEOTRACES Sections and Animated 3D Scenes. June, 2017, eGEOTRACES, (2015).

  155. 155.

    Baker, A., Thomas, M., Bange, H. & Plasencia Sanchez, E. Soluble trace metals in aerosols over the tropical south-east Pacific offshore of Peru. Biogeosciences 13, 817–825 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Baker, A. R. et al. Trace element and isotope deposition across the air–sea interface: progress and research needs. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20160190 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Heimburger, A., Losno, R. & Triquet, S. Solubility of iron and other trace elements in rain water collected on the Kerguelen Islands (South Indan Ocean). Biogeosciences 10, 6617–6628 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Powell, C. et al. Estimation of the atmospheric flux of nutrients and trace metals to the eastern tropical North Atlantic Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 72, 4029–4045 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Moore, J. K., Lindsay, K., Doney, S. C., Long, M. C. & Misumi, K. Marine ecosystem dynamics and biogeochemical cycling in the Community Earth System Model [CESM1(BGC)]: comparison of the 1990s with the 2090s under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 Scenarios. J. Clim. 26, 9291–9312 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Scanza, R. The Impact of Resolving Mineralogy of Dust on Climate and Biogeochemistry. PhD thesis, Cornell Univ. (2016).

  161. 161.

    Wilks, D. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences. International Geophysics Series (Academic Press, 2006).

  162. 162.

    Wuttig, K. et al. Impacts of dust deposition on dissolved trace metal concentrations (Mn, Al and Fe) during a mesocosm experiment - ProQuest. Biogeosciences 10, 2583–2600 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank DOE and NSF for grants supporting atmospheric deposition impacts on ocean biogeochemistry (DE-Sc0016362; NSF 1049033; CCF-1522054). Simulations were conducted using computers in Computational & Information Simulation Laboratory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, a National Science Foundation funded facility. We thank Keiran King for creating Fig. 6 and Laura Robledo for assistance editing Supplementary Table 2. This work was supported by a Alfred P Sloan Research Fellowship in Ocean Sciences and the Marion Milligan Mason Award for Women in the Chemical Sciences from AAAS to K.R.M.M. This work was also supported by the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future.

Author information




N.M.M., D.S.H., K.R.M.M., and J.K.M. wrote the manuscript. N.M.M. prepared Figs. 3 and 4, and Box 2. D.S.H. prepared Figs. 1 and 2, and analyzed data for Figs. 3 and 4 and Tables 12, and 3. K.R.M.M. prepared Figs. 5 and 6. J.K.M. prepared model simulations for Fig. 1a, b. N.M.M., D.S.H., and R.A.S. conducted model simulations for Figs. 1c and 3. R.A.S. and Y.Z. contributed model results and edited text. A.R.B. contributed observational data and edited text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalie M. Mahowald.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahowald, N.M., Hamilton, D.S., Mackey, K.R.M. et al. Aerosol trace metal leaching and impacts on marine microorganisms. Nat Commun 9, 2614 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing