Submarine glacial landforms in fjords are imprints of the dynamic behaviour of marine-terminating glaciers and are informative about their most recent retreat phase. Here we use detailed multibeam bathymetry to map glacial landforms in Petermann Fjord and Nares Strait, northwestern Greenland. A large grounding-zone wedge (GZW) demonstrates that Petermann Glacier stabilised at the fjord mouth for a considerable time, likely buttressed by an ice shelf. This stability was followed by successive backstepping of the ice margin down the GZW’s retrograde backslope forming small retreat ridges to 680 m current depth (730–800 m palaeodepth). Iceberg ploughmarks occurring somewhat deeper show that thick, grounded ice persisted to these water depths before final breakup occurred. The palaeodepth limit of the recessional moraines is consistent with final collapse driven by marine ice cliff instability (MICI) with retreat to the next stable position located underneath the present Petermann ice tongue, where the seafloor is unmapped.


Petermann Glacier is one of Greenland’s larger and faster flowing marine-terminating outlet glaciers (Fig. 1)1. It drains the northwestern sector of the Greenland Ice Sheet into Nares Strait losing mass primarily through submarine melting2,3, but also via episodic calving events from a floating ice shelf, hereafter referred to as an ice tongue, extending in front of the grounding line. Two major calving events in 2010 and 2012 shortened the ice tongue by ~35 km, reducing its extent by nearly 40%4,5,6 (Fig. 1). The ice tongue is currently ~42 km long and 20 km wide. Relatively warm (T > 0 °C) and salty (S > 34.6) subsurface water of Atlantic origin has been observed to enter the Petermann Fjord from the north via Robeson Channel and Hall Basin after flowing through the Arctic Ocean5. This warmer water has contributed to thinning of the ice tongue from below making it more prone to calving5.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Overview maps of the studied area. a The location of Petermann Glacier and the focus area of the Petermann 2015 Expedition with Swedish icebreaker Oden. b The multibeam mapped area of the Petermann Fjord and adjacent Nares Strait. The bathymetry is portrayed with a shaded relief based on a 15 × 15 m cell-size grid from the processed multibeam bathymetry (see Methods). The location of the Petermann Ice Tongue margin is shown at five different points in time; for 2010 (July 22), 2012 (July 3) and 2015 (Aug 2), the margins are based on Landsat images (white lines), while the margins have been digitised from published maps for 1876 and 19177,8 (stippled black lines). Note that the 2010 and 2012 locations of the margin are prior to the main calving events that occurred those years. The areas of the detailed maps shown in Figs. 26 are outlined with black boxes. The strike and dip of the bedrock planes in the western side of the fjord as revealed by the multibeam bathymetry are marked as well as the deepest mapped location (1158 m) and the deepest spot in the sill (443 m). BGl Belgrade Glacier, FG1 Faith Glacier, NS Nares Strait, SGl Skidbladner Glacier, UN Un-Named glacier. S1–S4 are bathymetric shoals

Two early maps of the Petermann Ice Tongue7,8 show its margin close to the 2010 location prior to the major calving event (Fig. 1b). These two ‘snapshots’ provide limited insight into the former dynamics of Petermann Glacier; a longer time series of its behaviour and well-mapped boundary conditions, e.g., fjord bathymetry and regional geology, are required to improve predictions of the dynamic behaviour of Petermann Glacier5,9. Until now, neither detailed bathymetry for the fjord10, nor information on the long-term dynamics of Petermann Glacier, have been available9. This is in contrast to several other Greenland’s large marine-terminating outlet glaciers, where analyses of the geometry and distribution of submarine glacial landforms has facilitated reconstructions of their deglacial ice dynamics11,12. These landforms provide vital information on former ice extents, ice-flow directions, stability points and several other parameters directly related to ice dynamics, including the presence or absence of water or deformable till at the ice-bed interface13. Landform records can be used to constrain numerical models of ice-sheet retreat as well as to test theoretical processes of ice-sheet instability14,15,16.

During late summer 2015, the Petermann 2015 Expedition using the Icebreaker (IB) Oden, targeted Petermann Fjord to investigate the marine cryosphere, oceanography and geology in the fjord and the adjacent Nares Strait region (Fig. 1). The marine programme consisted of geophysical mapping, sediment coring and oceanographic station work resulting in the near-complete mapping of the fjord by multibeam echosounders on IB Oden and the small survey boat RV Skidbladner (used to map near the shores). Here we analyse the submarine glacial landform record utilising the geophysical mapping data gathered during the Petermann 2015 Expedition. We identify a suite of glacial landforms providing information on the behaviour of Petermann Glacier that highlights the critical role of geology for the development of stability points in the seafloor landscape, where the ice retreat paused during deglaciation.


Description of the seafloor morphology and fjord setting

The mapping shows that Petermann Fjord has an overdeepened central thalweg with a maximum water depth of 1158 m ~10 km seaward from where the ice tongue margin was located in August 2015 (Fig. 1b). Petermann Fjord is separated from Hall Basin in Nares Strait by a prominent bathymetric sill that is generally shallower than 400 m, but with a 443 m deep passage ~2 km west of the midpoint of the fjord entrance (Fig. 1). Unless otherwise specified, references to the ice tongue margin are with respect to its 2015 extent.

The eastern side of Petermann Fjord consists of exposed carbonate and other sedimentary rocks of Palaeozoic age17, forming remarkably steep (some with slopes >70°) walls both above and below sea level. Seaward of the ice tongue margin, two outlet glaciers that drain an extension of the Greenland Ice Sheet debouch into the eastern side of Petermann Fjord.

The western side of the fjord displays an ~5-km-wide submarine plateau extending from the shore. This plateau is characterised by a set of nearly flat-lying terraces at different depths, with the deepest terrace, deeper than 600 m, in the central part and the shallowest with depths around 300 m in the northern, outer fjord, forming a part of the sill. The terrace steps most likely reflect underlying bedrock bedding planes, a phenomenon also observed on the sub-aerially exposed part of the western fjord wall. The bedrock planes are also observed in the western side of the fjord, ~10 km offshore from the ice tongue margin (Fig. 1). Two glaciers drain into the western side of Petermann Fjord, descending steeply from the mountain walls north of the ice tongue margin (Fig. 1b). We refer to the northernmost of these two unnamed glaciers as the Skidbladner Glacier since we mapped its grounded margin and related glacial landforms with our survey vessel RV Skidbladner. Huge blocks, some >100 m wide and >20 m high, probably originating from mass wasting of the steep fjord walls (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2), are visible in the multibeam bathymetry scattered on the seafloor and along the shores.

The seafloor morphology markedly changes character outside of the sill separating Petermann Fjord from Hall Basin. Both Kennedy and Robeson channels have generally smooth sediment-covered seafloors (Fig. 1). In between the smoother seafloor of these two channels is a large area, ~14 km wide and 64 km long, dominated by a fractured rough seafloor stretching diagonally across from the shore of Ellesmere Island in the southwest to the shore of the northwestern point of Hall Land in the northeast (Fig. 1b). Three relatively flat-topped shoals exist in Hall Basin marked S1–S3 in Fig. 1b. A fourth prominent shoal marked S4 has a more peaked crest, is shallower than 200 m and is located at the northern end of the rough seafloor area north of Hall Basin (Fig. 1b). This feature marks the border with the smoother and deeper Robeson Channel with the sharp transition between seafloor morphologies tracing the Wegener Transform Fault between Greenland and Ellesmere Island18.

Description and interpretation of glacial landforms

The seafloor of Petermann Fjord is heavily streamlined along the fjord direction (Figs. 1 and 2a, b) and there are signs of bedrock sculpting, particularly on the bathymetric plateau along the western side of the fjord. The first derivative of bathymetry, slope, accentuates the streamlined terrain (Fig. 2b). Longer streamlines consist of ridge-groove landforms that can be followed for up to 10 km. The inter-ridge spacing varies widely from <100 m to occasionally >500 m, and the ridge heights measured from the bottom of adjacent grooves range from a few metres to 50 m.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Detailed maps of the multibeam bathymetry and its first derivative, slope. a, b Petermann Fjord. c, d The fjord entrance and its bathymetric sill. GZW grounding-zone wedge. x–x′ and y–y′ show the locations of the bathymetric profiles in Fig. 4c, d. z–z′ in c shows the location of the sub-bottom profile in Supplementary Figure 3. e, f Eastern Hall Basin. The bathymetric profile between x and x′ is shown in Fig.  5b

Morphologically, the streamlined ridge-groove landforms in Petermann Fjord conform to descriptions of mega-scale glacial lineations (MSGL), used as an indicator of fast-flowing, grounded ice19,20. Some of the streamlined landforms begin at a positive up-sticking crag or bedrock high and continue like stretched out tails in the direction of the sill, consistent with the sub-glacially formed landform referred to as crag-and-tails20 (Fig. 2a). Among the mapped streamlined landforms in Petermann Fjord, a few have no apparent beginning at a positive-relief crag or bedrock high and have lower length-to-width ratios than the ridges belonging to MSGLs (Fig. 2a). We classify these as drumlins, a glacial landform generated beneath fast-flowing grounded ice where available sediment permits20,21.

Sets of streamlined landforms, dominantly crag-and-tails, also exist outside of the sill in Hall Basin (Figs. 2c–f and 3a–d). The orientations of these successively turn towards the north compared to those inside of the sill of Petermann Fjord. Finally, streamlined landforms are found both in Kennedy Channel and Robeson Channel, in the form of MSGLs, the former with higher length-to-width ratios and smaller relief compared to the MSGLs in Petermann Fjord (Fig. 3a–d). In Robeson Channel, a subtle fluting, i.e., smaller and less pronounced than MSGLs, is seen, most visibly in the slope map (Fig. 3b). The shoal S4 is also fluted in the same direction as landforms in the nearby but deeper Robeson Channel. The streamlined landforms in both Kennedy Channel and Robeson Channel are parallel to the axes of the channels.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Detailed maps of the multibeam bathymetry and its first derivative, slope. a, b Northern part of Hall Basin and the adjacent Robeson Channel. c, d Kennedy channel. MSGL mega-scale glacial lineations

Directional analysis of all mapped streamlined landforms shows that within Petermann Fjord, i.e., inside the sill, the ice stream of Petermann Glacier followed the shape of the fjord (towards 332°) and flowed through a 4-km-wide bottleneck before crossing the sill. In Hall Basin, the landforms show that ice flow progressively turned towards the northeast and eventually to a northerly direction from about 81°20′N (Fig. 2e, f). The ice stream that produced the streamlined landforms in Kennedy Channel followed the channel (towards 40°); in Robeson Channel, just northwest of the shoal S4, subtle fluting suggests ice flow towards 15°.

The sill separating Petermann Fjord from Hall Basin can morphologically be separated into northern and southern parts along a line representing the deepest water passage across the sill (Figs. 1b and 2c). The northern part has the form of a wedge with the steep front facing the Hall Basin (Figs. 2c and 4a). Its morphology and location suggest that it is a grounding-zone wedge (GZW), a constructional glacial landform formed at the grounded margins of marine-terminating glaciers, most likely in the presence of an ice shelf22, from persistent sediment accumulation during halts in ice retreat20,23 (Figs. 2c and 4a, b). The GZW at the northern sill of Petermann Fjord has a widest width of 8 km and a length, measured from its steep distal front to where it merges with the deep fjord trough, of 12 km (Fig. 4c, d). The GZW rises as much as 225 m from the base of the 4–9° steep front-facing Hall Basin (Fig. 4c). The streamlined landforms from Petermann Fjord reveal that the ice flow converged from the deep trough towards the trough bottleneck and GZW, and then spread out as it crossed the sill (Fig. 2c). At the final stage, when the GZW was fully developed and the grounding line was located on the sill, the ice stream must have flowed upslope on its 2–4° sloping ice-proximal side before reaching the crest (Fig. 4c). We propose that shallow bedrock flanks of the fjord, just inside of the sill, acted to stabilise the grounding line there during retreat both by pinning on the shallow (<300 m depth) areas and because the trough narrows at that point providing lateral buttressing. Ice pinned on the southern flank of the sill was likely slower moving compared to the ice-stream flow focused through the deepest part of the trough leading to less sediment supply and a locally smaller and more diffuse GZW on the southern sill (Fig. 2c). The four shoals in Hall Basin (S1–S4) do not have the same wedge-like morphology as the GZW forming the northern sill of Petermann Fjord (Figs. 1b, 2e and 3a).

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Bathymetric views of the entrance to Petermann Fjord, where the GZW is located. a Bathymetric 3D-view. b 3D-view of the same area as shown in a, but with calculated slope draped on top of the bathymetry. c Bathymetric profile between x and x′. Profile location is shown in a and b. d Bathymetric profile between y and y′. Profile location is shown in a and b

The surface of the GZW is characterised by small sinuous ridges with only a few metres of bathymetric expression (Figs. 2c and 4a). These ridges are particularly well portrayed in seafloor slope maps (Figs. 2d and 4b) and on a sub-bottom profile across the ridge from south to north (Supplementary Fig. 3). Quasi-parallel ridges trace the GZW crest in a regular pattern down its ice-proximal slope. We interpret these to be small morainic retreat ridges formed at the grounded tidewater margin of Petermann Glacier once it finally retreated from the fjord entrance. The implication of the recessional moraines, which form at tidewater glacier margins (i.e., no ice tongue24,25) is that, if present, any ice tongue that buttressed Petermann Glacier during its halt at the fjord mouth broke up prior to its retreat from the sill. The pattern of the ridges suggests a regular backstepping of the glacier margin, which makes us suggest that there was no ice tongue in place when they were formed.

Larger ridges with lengths 1–1.5 km and heights 5–10 m are mapped in Kennedy Channel transverse to the ice-flow direction spaced by about 500 to >2500 m (Figs. 1b and 3c). These ridges are also sinuous but, in general, do not appear to extend across the channel. We suggest that these are also recessional moraines, although they are significantly more widely spaced than the ridges on the GZW.

The eastern part of Hall Basin displays prominent channels directly north of the GZW (Fig. 2e). Here, channels >200-m-wide wind through the seafloor over a >10-km-long area (Fig. 2e). Some channels appear to either start from or terminate at flat local basins (Fig. 2e). Arcuate moats also occur in this area on the ice-proximal side of crag-and-tails and extend approximately normal to the former ice-flow direction (Fig. 2e).

The morphology of the channels and their location resemble several of those found in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica, where channels connecting local basins are interpreted to represent a well-developed subglacial drainage system26,27, an interpretation we adopt. Moats located on the ice-proximal side of MSGLs or crag-and-tails are commonly prescribed a formation from erosion of subglacial meltwater28, implying an abundance of subglacial meltwater in the eastern Hall Basin north of the GZW (Fig. 2e).

Six circular to semi-circular mounds are identified in the seafloor landscape in the eastern Hall Basin, north of the GZW (Figs. 2e, f and 5a, b). The largest three of these mounds rise as much as 100 m from the surrounding seafloor, have outer diameters of 1.5 km and central depressions that are several hundred metres wide and up to 50 m deep. The depressions open out towards the side facing downslope and away from the coast, which makes them resemble giant horseshoes (Fig. 5a). The sides of the mounds slope in the range of 10–20°, although some sections have slopes >30°. Possible mechanisms for formation of the mounds are addressed in the discussion.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Bathymetric views of one of the horseshoe-shaped mounds. a Bathymetric 3D-view. This mound is located in the southeastern part of the detailed map in Fig. 2. b Bathymetric profile between x and x′ shown in a

Throughout the region, bathymetric shoals and shallow areas along the coasts are heavily marked by iceberg ploughmarks (Figs. 2, 3 and 6). Areas shallower than 400 m are particularly heavily ploughed. The majority of the ploughmarks are a few metres deep and extend for some hundreds of metres, although larger ploughmarks stretching for several kilometres and with bathymetric expression of more than 10 m do exist. The ploughmarks on the GZW are at first difficult to separate from the retreat ridges, however, the systematic organisation of the latter following a retreating ice margin approximately parallel to the GZW crest makes it possible (Fig. 2c, d). At the start of the 2015 expedition, an ~1.5 × 3 km large iceberg calved off the ice tongue of Petermann Glacier and broke into several pieces that grounded on the shallow bank north of Bessel Fjord (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 4). We mapped the ploughmarks produced from one of the pieces (size: 200 × 400 m) that grounded in 68 m water depth (Fig. 6a). The relatively wide, but thin, iceberg had multiple keels that produced ploughmarks that were more than 2 m deep.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

High-resolution bathymetry from the RV Skidbladner surveys. a Seafloor bathymetry of the area where one of the icebergs grounded that calved from the Petermann Ice Tongue during the expedition. b Seafloor bathymetry showing iceberg plough ridges in front of Skidbladner Glacier. c 3D-view of the mapped seafloor around the grounded iceberg. The sidewalls of the iceberg are mapped by the multibeam sonar and clearly visible in the data. The bathymetric shaded reliefs in a, b and c are based on processed grids (3 × 3 m cell size) from the RV Skidbladner surveys

Where the deep trough of Petermann Fjord meets the GZW, the area of large MSGLs ends with furrows terminating in several distinct ploughed up ridges (Fig. 2c). The largest of these features has a groove that is 300 m wide with sediment ridges 4 m high. Identical landforms are described from the glacial trough of Pine Island Bay, where they were interpreted to have been formed when deep-drafting icebergs grounded on the up-sloping trough and rotated or further broke into pieces before floating away29. The iceberg grounding produced a furrow ending in a ploughed up ridge, hence the landform was referred to as an iceberg plough ridge29. Small, but clear versions of these iceberg plough ridges are mapped in front of the outlet glacier we refer to as Skidbladner Glacier (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 5).


The dynamics of glaciers, and particularly marine-terminating glaciers, are influenced by many factors in addition to climate, including ocean-ice interactions30,31, bedrock controls32, buttressing by floating ice shelves and fjord geometry33.

The glacial landform record preserved on the seafloor will, under normal circumstances, be biased towards the final ice-retreat phase and breakup as earlier events are often erased by later events20,34. We find no evidence suggesting otherwise in Petermann Fjord or the adjacent Hall Basin and Robeson and Kennedy Channels of Nares Strait. This implies that the glacial landforms we mapped provide information on the retreat and breakup following the last glacial maximum (LGM), though it is possible that some glacial landforms (e.g., the large GZW at the Petermann Fjord entrance), may have been built over long time periods, even from multiple glaciations.

Erratic boulders from Greenland, documented as far as 20 km inland from the present north-eastern coast of Ellesmere Island, have been interpreted to show that the LGM Greenland Ice Sheet extended across Nares Strait coalescing with the Innuitian Ice Sheet on Ellesmere Island35,36. During the deglaciation, an ice stream confined to Nares Strait flowed north-eastward off Washington Land and Hall Land on the Greenland side36. Our mapping indicates that an ice stream debouched from Petermann Fjord and turned eastward to merge with an ice stream flowing towards the northeast in Nares Strait (Fig. 7). This fits the deglaciation pattern in Nares Strait presented by England36 for 10,000, 9000 and 8500 radiocarbon years before present (BP), except that we do not find morphological evidence of ice turning west out of Petermann Fjord’s southern side as suggested by England36 (Fig. 7). The ages of the ice retreat margins by England36 will henceforth be provided in calendar years BP. Calibrations have been made on the ice retreat margins using the Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curve37 and a ΔR = 268 ± 82 years, based on the five nearest analysed shells from Nares Strait and northern Baffin Bay38. England36 applied a reservoir correction of 410 years, which we accounted for when calibrating the radiocarbon years of the three ice margins presented in Fig. 7. Furthermore, considering the uncertainty in assigning a representative ΔR for the Petermann Fjord area, calibrations of the ice margin ages using ΔR = 0 years are in addition presented in the caption of Fig. 7. These may be seen as maximum age constraints of the ice margins. Our mapping suggests that the ice stream emanating from Petermann Fjord (Petermann Ice Stream) was likely turned north-eastwards by ice already flowing through Nares Strait (Fig. 7). We cannot, however, constrain the presence or absence of such westward ice-flow pattern at an earlier stage. The fluted seafloor in Robeson Channel suggests that grounded ice continued to flow north-eastward beyond the shoal S4. The slight northward deflection of the lineations in Robeson Channel just beyond S4 may be a result of ice flow in Nares Strait merging with the Petermann Ice Stream.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Interpretation of mapped glacial landforms in Petermann Fjord and adjacent areas of Hall Basin, Kennedy Channel and Robeson Channel. The ice retreat margins from England (1999) are shown for 9300 (green), 8700 (yellow) and 7600 (blue) cal. years BP. The ice margins are calibrated using ΔR = 268 ± 82 years. Applying ΔR = 0 yields maximum calibrated ages of 9600, 9000 and 7900 cal. years BP. See main text for calendar year calibration of the C14 years (8500, 8000 and 7000) originally presented by England (1999). The stippled marine continuations of the ice margins are inferred in this work based on the mapped glacial landforms

At about 9300 cal. years BP, the ice margin had retreated to the area of Kap Lupton, northwestern Hall Land, from where it extended across the strait to the northeast Judge Daly Promontory (Fig. 7)36. Bedrock in the northernmost part of Hall Land comprises Late Silurian–Early Devonian limestones39. The seafloor morphology hints that the same type of bedrock extends across Hall Basin to the north-eastern tip of Judge Daly Promontory (Fig. 1). Since ice streams have a tendency to find stability points at natural bottlenecks or where resistant bedrocks make shoals, we suggest that the ice margin between Judge Daly Promontory and the Hall Land was grounded at 9300 cal. years BP along the apparent fault zone, where the bedrock and seafloor depth dramatically changes character (Fig. 7). We have no data that indicate whether an ice shelf extended from this grounding line over from Robeson Channel towards the Arctic Ocean at this time.

The abundant indications of meltwater next to the large mounds, some of which are horseshoe shaped (Fig. 2e), are here interpreted to indicate the formation of lateral shear margin that separated the fast-flowing, grounded Petermann Ice Stream from slower flowing, or perhaps even stagnant, ice on the shallower bank off western Hall Land (Fig. 7). Stagnant or slow-flowing ice commonly bounds fast-flowing ice streams, and the heavily crevassed shear zones in between the two act as a conduits for meltwater; they also constitute the location where ice stream shear margin moraines form40. The ridge-like feature winding along the longest meltwater channel (Fig. 2e) may comprise a shear margin moraine or an esker-like feature following the underlying bedrock. In either case, the mounds are located in the area where the ice became stagnant or slow flowing and where meltwater was plentiful, inviting comparison with known glacial landforms. The lack of information about the geological composition of the mounds makes their origin difficult to determine. However, we have dismissed a submarine volcanic origin for the mounds as there are no signs of volcanic formations or activity in the nearby area. Considering that the mounds are located next to mapped carbonate platforms of the lower Palaeozoic Washington Land Group formation on Kap Tyson39,41, we cannot exclude that they may be carbonate mounds42. Against this interpretation is their well-preserved appearance, considering that they have been overridden by the Petermann Glacier, and that central depressions not are common features of carbonate mounds. Another possibility is that the mounds comprise a glacial landform. They may represent kames, ridges or flat-topped mounds for which the formation is attributed to stagnant ice and meltwater43,44. Specific interpretations of how kames are formed vary greatly, although they generally are inferred to contain sediments initially accumulated primarily by meltwater on or in the ice, commonly in depressions or crevasses. The sediments are deposited on the bed after the glacier melts, often in ridges, mounds or terraces. It is not, however, obvious how the sediment would find its way through stagnant ice in a marine environment to form a nearly round, or horseshoe-shaped, kame on the seafloor in several hundred metres water depth. Stagnant marine ice would likely lift from the bed and disintegrate into icebergs before sediments on its surface, or englacial, melt through. It is especially hard to envision sediment deposition in a near-circular mound, occasionally with a central depression that is open towards one side, considering the ice breakup that would occur in a marine environment, which is distinctly different from a stagnant ice that slowly melts in a terrestrial environment.

Near-circular sediment mounds with central depressions do exist in the heavily glaciated landscape of North Dakota, USA45. These are referred to as 'doughnuts' and are interpreted to be so called 'dead-ice moraines'45 formed when sediments fill a depression in stagnant ice and the ice eventually melts, leaving a mound of sediment with a core of ice inside. When the ice core eventually melts, the topography is inverted resulting in a central depression in the mound; many of these features also have an opening on the downstream end. Again, the marine environment poses problems for this explanation (i.e., keeping ice in contact with the seafloor) though enough englacial material could prevent the ice from floating.

Given the challenges of calling upon terrestrial analogues formed in stagnant ice for the formation of near-circular mounds in a marine environment, we find that we cannot readily adopt any previously published formation mechanism for similarly looking mounds, e.g., kames44. However, we suggest a mechanism where sediment accumulates on stagnant ice in depressions, much like that commonly proposed for kames. The accumulated sediment must eventually make its way through the ice by meltwater-aided transport, likely through systems of moulins or crevasses, to be deposited as a confined, high-relief mound on the seafloor once the stagnant ice breaks up and disintegrates. The horseshoe shape of some of the mounds remains an enigma. However, we speculate that it may originate from meltwater that breaches the edge of the deposited sediment mound once the central depression is formed, and flows towards the deeper side of the seafloor.

Field work on Hall Land suggests that the ice margin had retreated to the area south of Kap Tyson at 8700 cal. years BP36 (Fig. 7). In marine areas, the exact timing of ice retreat and the corresponding opening of Nares Strait as an Arctic-Atlantic connection is not well known46. Yet the location of Kap Tyson adjacent to the GZW strongly suggests that the Petermann Ice Stream margin was located here at this time (Fig. 7).

The dimensions of the surface expression of the GZW are comparable with other larger GZWs, such as the largest in Pine Island Trough (GZW5), West Antarctica47. Considering sediment flux rates between 500 and 1650 m3 a−1 m−1, Jakobsson, et al.47 estimated that the formation of GZW5 took between 600 and 2000 years. Estimating the volume of the Petermann GZW from multibeam sonar data and using the same flux rates as for the Pine Island Bay GZW5, in line with other West Greenland outlet glaciers48, suggests that this feature may have accumulated in ~750–2480 years (Supplementary Figs. 6, 7). The ice margin reconstructions by England36 suggest that the Petermann Ice Stream likely occupied the location of the GZW for about 1100 years, within our estimate using a GZW volume based on its surficial geometry. Even if the GZW accumulated over several glaciations, it likely represents a considerable stability point for the Petermann Ice Stream during its last retreat from Hall Basin into Petermann Fjord.

Current understanding of GZW formation implies the presence of a floating ice shelf beyond the grounding line, allowing the ice shelf to stabilise as the wedge grows vertically despite concurrent ice-sheet thinning22,49. We propose that Petermann Ice Stream was bounded by an ice shelf when it was pinned at the fjord mouth sill, with the ice shelf providing additional stability in the form of frontal buttressing50. Given evidence that Robeson Channel experienced reduced sea-ice cover from 9000 to 6000 cal. years BP46 it is likely that the ice shelf did not extend that far out of the fjord (>30 km). Relatively warm Atlantic water (T, S) was present in Nares Strait by 9000 cal. years BP46 and may have promoted ice shelf thinning to the point of ice shelf breakup, thus removing frontal buttressing and promoting retreat of Petermann Ice Stream into the fjord as a tidewater glacier margin.

The morainic ridges on the surface of the GZW indicate that retreat from the fjord mouth began with backstepping of the (now tidewater) ice-stream margin (Figs. 2c,b, 4a, b and 7) perhaps around 7600 cal. years BP as inferred from the location of the ice margin on land36. The ice-proximal (landward) side of the GZW has a retrograding slope between about 2° and 4°, implying that the ice stream margin flowed upslope during this retreat phase when the transverse morainic ridges were formed (Fig. 4c), presumably retaining stability from the constriction of the ice stream into the narrow, central trough just landward of the sill. The deepest mapped transverse morainic ridges are located at a present water depth of about 680 m with iceberg plough ridges occurring a bit deeper (Fig. 7). We find no morphological evidence from inner Petermann Fjord, inside of the GZW and moraines, suggesting that the Petermann Ice Stream made another halt during its retreat. In other words, following the formation of the deepest transverse moraines on the proximal retrograde slope of the GZW, the Petermann Ice Stream rapidly retreated throughout the remainder of the fjord we mapped (Fig. 1). Future mapping beneath the ice tongue may reveal additional grounding lines that are not visible at present. Of particular interest is a bedrock sill ~25 km from the modern grounding line with estimated water depth of 540–610 m51, which could have provided an advanced stable position following retreat from the fjord mouth sill.

Weertman52 suggested that marine ice streams flowing on retrograde slopes are inherently unstable, specifically when lacking a buttressing ice tongue or shelf. If the vertical ice cliff at the margin rises more than about 100 m above sea level, the margin may begin fracturing and retreating rapidly, via massive calving, in a phenomena referred to as marine ice cliff instability (MICI)53. Assuming a density of ocean of water of 1026 kg m−3 and of ice 917 kg m−3, the draft of a floating ice mass is 0.89 × total ice thickness. This says that an ice cliff rising 100 m above sea level may form in the marine environment when the ice is grounded at water depths 809 m. Thus, grounding zones in more than 800 m water depth are considered to be particularly sensitive to MICI if there are no buttressing ice tongues or shelves in place53. Iceberg ploughmarks mapped in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica, indicate that, during the last deglaciation, MICI was likely responsible for a rapid and sustained retreat of the Pine Island Glacier beginning around 12,300 cal. years BP14. The present depth of the Petermann Fjord (>1000 m), the retrograde landward slope of the GZW, and the location of iceberg plough ridges confirming calving all the way to the ice-stream base, lead us to suggest that MICI may have caused the Petermann Ice Stream to retreat rapidly from the fjord mouth sometime after 7600 cal. years BP. For 1100 years before the rapid retreat, the ice stream was stable at the fjord mouth facilitated by frontal buttressing by an ice shelf, lateral pinning points and a significant narrowing of the ice-stream trough. The palaeodepth of the GZW and Petermann Fjord can be derived for a given time if the isostatic depression of the area is known. At 7000 cal. years BP, the isostatic depression has been estimated to ~70 m54,55,56, which implies that the point where MICI would occur is merely 50 m deeper than the deepest mapped morainic ridge on the retrograde landward slope of the GZW.

Taken together, the subglacial landform record in Petermann Fjord and adjacent Hall Basin reveals the importance of geometric controls from the landscape, bedrock geology and of glaciological processes during the Holocene retreat of the Petermann Glacier to its present position, where the grounding line is located ~90 km from the major GZW at the fjord entrance. The landform record shows that the fjord geometry likely played a role in determining where the Petermann Glacier was stable for perhaps as long as 1100 years, while glaciological processes in the form of MICI may have put a drastic end to this stable period, but only after the buttressing ice tongue broke up. Crucially, it was the interplay of all these factors that governed the final retreat of Petermann Glacier. Therefore, this study highlights the need to improve our knowledge of the whole glacier system, in particular high-resolution bathymetry in front of marine-terminating glaciers or beneath their ice tongues, before they can be accurately portrayed in ice-sheet models.


Geophysical mapping with IB Oden

The Petermann 2015 Expedition started and ended in Thule, Greenland on July 30 and September 3, respectively. Systematic multibeam bathymetric mapping and sub-bottom profiling was carried out with IB Oden in Petermann Fjord and the adjacent areas of Nares Strait, including Hall Basin, Kennedy Channel and Robeson Channel (Fig. 1a, b). In total, 3100 km2 was mapped with essentially full coverage from IB Oden, excluding the transit lines to and from the survey area. IB Oden has a hull-mounted Kongsberg EM 122 (12 kHz, 1° × 1°) multibeam echosounder and an SBP 120 (2–7 kHz, 3° × 3°) chirp sonar sub-bottom profiler installed. Navigation was provided by a Seatex Seapath 330 GPS/GLONASS navigation system integrating heading and attitude, and an Seapath MRU5 inertial motion sensor providing pitch, roll, yaw and heave. The accuracy of the positions from the combined GPS/GLONASS solution varied with available satellites, but was commonly reported to be within a 5 m sphere, or better, both vertically and horizontally. Regular CTD (Conductivity, Temperature, Depth) stations and XBTs (Expendable Bathy Thermograph) were used to provide the multibeam system on IB Oden with regular sound speed profiles of the water column.

Geophysical mapping with RV Skidbladner

In some near-shore areas, 30 km2 of the seafloor was mapped from the 6.4-m-long RV Skidbladner using a Kongsberg EM 2040 (200–400 kHz, 1° × 1°) multibeam system bow mounted on a pole that can be hoisted up for transit. A Valeport sound velocity probe was used to acquire sound speed profiles. The navigation system of RV Skidbladner consists of a Seatex Seapath 330 + with RTK (Real Time Kinematic) capability. The motion sensor unit measuring roll, pitch, yaw and heave was a Seatex MRU5 + mounted in a subsea bottle on the EM 2040 transducer casing. During mapping operations, a Hemisphere A325 Smart antenna connected to a SATELLINE-EASy Pro 35 W 403–473 MHz radio was stationed on nearby topographic high points to provide RTK corrections sent using the RTCM 3.0 protocol. The accuracy of the GPS/GLONASS positions after RTK corrections was generally reported by the Seapath 330 + system to be within a 10 cm sphere, or better, both vertically and horizontally.

Acquisition and processing software

All multibeam data were acquired using Kongsberg Seafloor Information System (SIS) and processed using a combination of Caris and QPS Fledermaus processing software. The processed data were gridded to a horizontal resolution of 15 × 15 m for data from IB Oden and 3 × 3 m for data from RV Skidbladner. Seafloor morphology was interpreted in the 3D environment of Fledermaus and maps were subsequently produced using the Open Source GIS software QGIS (http://www.qgis.org). The chirp sub-bottom profiler data were acquired using the Kongberg TOPAS software and the profile displayed in this work was post-processed using tools provided by the Geological Survey of Canada (courtesy Bob Courtney).

Data availability

The multibeam bathymetry shown in this work is available for download from https://bolin.su.se/data/contributions.php?d=1609&p=MjAxOC0wNS0xOCAxNTowNDozOS4yNzg4NjMgMzk3ODknfy8.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Rignot, E. & Mouginot, J. Ice flow in Greenland for the International Polar Year 2008–2009. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L11501 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Cai, C., Rignot, E., Menemenlis, D. & Nakayama, Y. Observations and modeling of ocean-induced melt beneath Petermann Glacier Ice Shelf in northwestern Greenland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 8396–8403 (2017).

  3. 3.

    Rignot, E. & Steffen, K. Channelized bottom melting and stability of floating ice shelves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L02503 (2008).

  4. 4.

    Johannessen, O. M. Babiker, M., & Miles, M. W. Petermann Glacier, North Greenland: massive calving in 2010 and the past half century. Cryosphere Discuss 5, 169–181 (2011).

  5. 5.

    Münchow, A., Padman, L. & Fricker, H. A. Interannual changes of the floating ice shelf of Petermann Gletscher, North Greenland, from 2000 to 2012. J. Glaciol. 60, 489–499 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Münchow, A., Padman, L., Washam, P. & Nicholls, K. W. The ice shelf of Petermann Gletscher, North Greenland, and its connection to the Arctic and Atlantic Oceans. Oceanography 29, 84–95 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Koch, L. Contributions to the glaciology of North Greenland. Medd. Om Grønl. 65, 181–464 (1928).

  8. 8.

    Petermann, A. H. in Map from British Arctic Expedition 1875-1876 (ed. Sir George Strong Nares) (Tresling & C, Hof-Lith, Amsterdam, 1876).

  9. 9.

    Falkner, K. K. et al. Context for the recent massive Petermann Glacier Calving Event. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 92, 117–118 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Fenty, I. et al. Oceans melting Greenland: early results from NASA’s ocean-ice mission in Greenland. Oceanography 29, 71–83 (2016).

  11. 11.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. et al. Late quaternary ice flow in a West Greenland fjord and cross-shelf trough system: submarine landforms from Rink Isbrae to Uummannaq shelf and slope. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 292–309 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Ó Cofaigh, C., Dowdeswell, J. A. & Grobe, H. in Holocene glacimarine sedimentation, inner Scoresby Sund, East Greenland: the influence of fast-flowing ice-sheet outlet glaciers. Marine Geol. 175, 103–129 (2001).

  13. 13.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. et al. Introduction: an Atlas of Submarine Glacial Landforms. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 46, 3–14 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Wise, M. G., Dowdeswell, J. A., Jakobsson, M. & Larter, R. D. Evidence of marine ice-cliff instability in Pine Island Bay from iceberg-keel plough marks. Nature 550, 506–510 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Favier, L., Pattyn, F., Berger, S. & Drews, R. Dynamic influence of pinning points on marine ice-sheet stability: a numerical study in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Cryosphere 10, 2623–2635 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. Mapping submarine glacial landforms using acoustic methods. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 46, 17–40 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Dawes, P. R. Explanatory notes to the Geological map of Greenland, 1:500 000, Humboldt Gletscher, Sheet 6. 1–48 (Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, 2004).

  18. 18.

    Tessensohn, F., Jackson, R. H. & Reid, I. D. The Tectonic Evolution of Nares Strait: Implications of New Data. Vol. 74, 191–198 (Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research & German Society of Polar Research, Bremerhaven, 2006).

  19. 19.

    Clark, C. D. Mega-scale glacial lineations and cross-cutting ice-flow landforms. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 18, 1–29 (1993).

  20. 20.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. et al. The variety and distribution of submarine glacial landforms and implications for ice-sheet reconstruction. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 46, 519–552 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Clark, C. D., Hughes, A. L. C., Greenwood, S. L., Spagnolo, M. & Ng, F. S. L. Size and shape characteristics of drumlins, derived from a large sample, and associated scaling laws. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 677–692 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Dowdeswell, J. A. & Fugelli, E. M. G. The seismic architecture and geometry of grounding-zone wedges formed at the marine margins of past ice sheets. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 124, 1750–1761 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Bentley, C. R. & Rooney, S. T. Deformation of till beneath ice stream B, West Antarctica. Nature 322, 57–59 (1986).

  24. 24.

    Boulton, G. S. Push-moraines and glacier-contact fans in marine and terrestrial environments. Sedimentology 33, 677–698 (1986).

  25. 25.

    Ottesen, D. & Dowdeswell, J. A. Assemblages of submarine landforms produced by tidewater glaciers in Svalbard. J. Geophys. Res. 111, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JF000330 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Nitsche, F. O. et al. Paleo ice flow and subglacial meltwater dynamics in Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica. Cryosphere 7, 249–262 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Lowe, A. L. & Anderson, J. B. Evidence for abundant subglacial meltwater beneath the paleo-ice sheet in Pine Island Bay, Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 49, 125–138 (2003).

  28. 28.

    MacLean, B., Blasco, S., Bennett, R., Hughes Clarke, J. E. & Patton, E. Moat features, Amundsen Gulf, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geol. Soc. Lond. Mem. 46, 51–52 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. Geological record of Ice Shelf Breakup and Grounding Line Retreat, Pine Island Bay, West Antarctica. Geology 39, 691–694 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Holland, D. M., Thomas, R. H., Young, B. D., Ribergaard, M. H. & Lyberth, B. Acceleration of Jakobshavn Isbræ triggered by warm subsurface ocean waters. Nat. Geosci. 1, 659–664 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Straneo, F. et al. Rapid circulation of warm subtropical waters in a major glacial fjord in East Greenland. Nat. Geosci. 3, 182–186 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Van der Veen, C. J., Plummer, J. C. & Strearns, L. A. Controls on the recent speed-up of Jakobshavn Isbræ, West Greenland. J. Glaciol. 57, 770–782 (2011).

  33. 33.

    Meier, M. F. & Post, A. Fast tidewater glaciers. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 9051–9058 (1987).

  34. 34.

    Landvik, J. Y., Alexanderson, H., Henriksen, M. & Ingólfsson, Ó. Landscape imprints of changing glacial regimes during ice-sheet build-up and decay: a conceptual model from Svalbard. Quat. Sci. Rev. 92, 258–268 (2014).

  35. 35.

    England, J. & Bradley, R. S. Past glacial activity in the Canadian high arctic. Science 200, 265–270 (1978).

  36. 36.

    England, J. Coalescent Greenland and Innuitian ice during the last glacial maximum: revising the Quaternary of the Canadian high arctic. Quat. Sci. Rev. 18, 421–456 (1999).

  37. 37.

    Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Coulthard, R. D., Furze, M. F. A., Pieńkowski, A. J., Chantel Nixon, F. & England, J. H. New marine ΔR values for arctic Canada. Quat. Geochronol. 5, 419–434 (2010).

  39. 39.

    Trettin, H. P. Geology of the Innuitian Orogen and Arctic Platform of Canada and Greenland Vol. E (Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, 1991).

  40. 40.

    Stokes, C. R. & Clark, C. D. Ice stream shear margin moraines. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 27, 547–558 (2002).

  41. 41.

    Henriksen, N. & Higgins, A. K. Early Palaeozoic basin development of North Greenland part of the Franklinian basin. Polarforschung 68, 131–140 (2000).

  42. 42.

    Hebbeln, D. & Samankassou, E. Where did ancient carbonate mounds grow — In bathyal depths or in shallow shelf waters? Earth Sci. Rev. 145, 56–65 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Livingstone, S. J., Evans, D. J. A., Ó Cofaigh, C. & Hopkins, J. The Brampton kame belt and Pennine escarpment meltwater channel system (Cumbria, UK): morphology, sedimentology and formation. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 121, 423–443 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Holmes, C. D. Kames. Am. J. Sci. 245, 240–249 (1947).

  45. 45.

    Bluemle, J. P., Reid, J. R. & Mitchell, K. J. R. in Developments in Quaternary Sciences Vol. 2 (eds Ehlers, J. & Gibbard, P. L.) 207–212 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).

  46. 46.

    Jennings, A. E. et al. The Holocene history of Nares Strait: transition from glacial bay to Arctic-Atlantic throughflow. Oceanography 24, 26–41 (2011).

  47. 47.

    Jakobsson, M. et al. Ice sheet retreat dynamics inferred from glacial morphology of the central Pine Island Bay Trough, West Antarctica. Quat. Sci. Rev. 38, 1–10 (2012).

  48. 48.

    Hogan, K. A., Dowdeswell, J. A. & ÓCofaigh, C. Glacimarine sedimentary processes and depositional environments in an embayment fed by West Greenland ice streams. Mar. Geol. 311-314, 1–16 (2012).

  49. 49.

    Alley, R. B., Blankenship, D. D., Rooney, S. T. & Bentley, C. R. Sedimentation beneath ice shelves -- the view from ice stream B. Mar. Geol. 85, 101–120 (1989).

  50. 50.

    Gudmundsson, G. H. Ice-shelf buttressing and the stability of marine ice sheets. Cryosphere 7, 647–655 (2013).

  51. 51.

    Tinto, K. J., Bell, R. E., Cochran, J. R. & Münchow, A. Bathymetry in Petermann fjord from Operation IceBridge aerogravity. Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett. 422, 58–66 (2015).

  52. 52.

    Weertman, J. Stability of the junction between an ice sheet and an ice shelf. J. Glaciol. 13, 3–11 (1974).

  53. 53.

    Pollard, D., DeConto, R. M. & Alley, R. B. Potential Antarctic Ice Sheet retreat driven by hydrofracturing and ice cliff failure. Earth. Planet. Sci. Lett. 412, 112–121 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Lecavalier, B. S. et al. A model of Greenland ice sheet deglaciation constrained by observations of relative sea level and ice extent. Quat. Sci. Rev. 102, 54–84 (2014).

  55. 55.

    England, J. The late Quaternary history of Hall Land, northwest Greenland. Can. J. Earth. Sci. 22, 1394–1408 (1985).

  56. 56.

    Bennike, O. L. E. Late Quaternary history of Washington Land, North Greenland. Boreas 31, 260–272 (2002).

Download references


We thank US-NSF Polar Programs, NASA, UNAVCO, CH2M Polar Field Services (Jessy Jenkins), Polar Geospatial Center, the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat and the Swedish Maritime Administration for supporting the Petermann 2015 Expedition. K.A.H. was supported by the British Antarctic Survey ‘Polar Science for Planet Earth’ programme funded by the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council. M.J. and colleagues from Stockholm University were supported by a grant from the Swedish Research Council (VR).

Author information


  1. Department of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    • Martin Jakobsson
    • , Björn Eriksson
    • , Rezwan Mohammad
    •  & Christian Stranne
  2. Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

    • Martin Jakobsson
    • , Björn Eriksson
    • , Rezwan Mohammad
    •  & Christian Stranne
  3. British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK

    • Kelly A. Hogan
  4. Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    • Larry A. Mayer
    •  & Kevin Jerram
  5. College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA

    • Alan Mix
    • , Joe Stoner
    •  & Brendan Reilly
  6. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309-0450, USA

    • Anne Jennings
  7. Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark

    • Christof Pearce


  1. Search for Martin Jakobsson in:

  2. Search for Kelly A. Hogan in:

  3. Search for Larry A. Mayer in:

  4. Search for Alan Mix in:

  5. Search for Anne Jennings in:

  6. Search for Joe Stoner in:

  7. Search for Björn Eriksson in:

  8. Search for Kevin Jerram in:

  9. Search for Rezwan Mohammad in:

  10. Search for Christof Pearce in:

  11. Search for Brendan Reilly in:

  12. Search for Christian Stranne in:


M.J., K.A.H. and L.A.M. developed the concept of this paper and led the writing. A.M., L.A.M. and M.J. initiated the project and led the field work. A.M., A.J., J.S., K.J., C.P., B.R. and C.S. took part in the writing process and interpretation of results. B.E. and R.M. participated in the field work, data processing and evaluation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Jakobsson.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.