Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dinosaur diversification linked with the Carnian Pluvial Episode


Dinosaurs diversified in two steps during the Triassic. They originated about 245 Ma, during the recovery from the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, and then remained insignificant until they exploded in diversity and ecological importance during the Late Triassic. Hitherto, this Late Triassic explosion was poorly constrained and poorly dated. Here we provide evidence that it followed the Carnian Pluvial Episode (CPE), dated to 234–232 Ma, a time when climates switched from arid to humid and back to arid again. Our evidence comes from a combined analysis of skeletal evidence and footprint occurrences, and especially from the exquisitely dated ichnofaunas of the Italian Dolomites. These provide evidence of tetrapod faunal compositions through the Carnian and Norian, and show that dinosaur footprints appear exactly at the time of the CPE. We argue then that dinosaurs diversified explosively in the mid Carnian, at a time of major climate and floral change and the extinction of key herbivores, which the dinosaurs opportunistically replaced.


Dinosaurs are exemplars of an evolutionarily successful group1. The clade Dinosauria includes the large Mesozoic reptiles, as well as birds, comprising more than 11,000 species, with extremely disparate morphologies. The dinosaur stem lineage originated in the early Triassic, in the maelstrom of perturbed environments and recovering faunas following the devastation of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction2. However, the mode and timing of the origin and diversification of the dinosaurs have so far been unresolved.

The clade Dinosauria rose to its ecological acme through the 50 myr of the Triassic, and two key steps can be recognised: the origin of Dinosauria in the early-Middle Triassic, followed by a span of some 20 myr during which dinosaurs existed at low diversity, and then the explosive diversification of the clade in the early part of the Late Triassic2. The focus here is on this latter diversification event, when new lineages emerged and the ecological dominance of the group, measured by relative abundance of specimens in well documented faunas, shifted from <5 to >90%2,3,4. The diversification of dinosaurs at this point, especially herbivorous forms, followed extinctions of previously ecologically significant herbivorous groups such as dicynodonts and rhynchosaurs.

Over the years, this explosion, which we term the ‘dinosaur diversification event’ (DDE), was dated variously to the Carnian and Norian, depending on continuing revision of continental stratigraphy5,6. The problem has been that there was no independent system of dating for the bulk of Triassic terrestrial rock successions. Initially, they were roughly aligned in time according to their contained tetrapod faunas7, providing approximate early, middle, and late Triassic divisions. However, the late Triassic is over 35 myr long, and a great deal happened during that time, meaning that a reliable way to subdivide this long interval is required.

This uncertainty highlights the need to avoid circularity in dating the key events in the origin of dinosaurs by not using tetrapod faunas to provide the dating. We believe that we have the solution here, which is to use rock sections that are dated independently of the tetrapod fossils, by means of magnetostratigraphy, radioisotopic dates, and correlations to marine successions dated by ammonites, conodonts, and other fossils. Recent attempts to understand the relative ordering of Triassic terrestrial tetrapod faunas2,3,4,8,9,10 were founded in part on magnetostratigraphic data that provided correlations between red bed successions of Europe and North America11,12, combined with some exact age dates in the Carnian, Norian, and Rhaetian13, some of them directly from tetrapod-bearing sedimentary units. Here and there, cross-overs between terrestrial and marine sediments, for example around the edges of the Germanic Basin, provided additional independent age tie-points. Nonetheless, critical faunas with early dinosaurs from the North American south-west, India and, at least in part, Argentina and Brazil, currently lack precise independent age dating, and so cannot be used to test the timing of the event.

There was an important climate-change event in the Carnian, the Carnian Pluvial Episode (CPE)14, termed also “Carnian Humid Episode”, “Carnian Pluvial Event” or “Wet Intermezzo”15 that corresponds to a time of major turnover in the oceans and on land. Could this switch from arid to humid and then back to arid conditions mark the trigger for the replacement of precursor herbivorous reptiles by the dinosaurs3,8?

The Permian and Triassic sedimentary sequences of the Alpine region offer a unique opportunity in this respect. The palaeogeographic setting of the Dolomites and nearby areas (NE Italy), gave rise to a unique geological situation, now well exposed in several sections, in which marine sediments, continental deposits, and volcanites interfinger16. Correlation of sections in the region, using marine fossils, magnetostratigraphy, and exact radioisotopic age dates, has allowed the development of a precise framework of biostratigraphic and chronological data, which can now be used to date faunas and events accurately. This temporal standard is based on all kinds of data, but not on tetrapod skeletons or footprints, so is an independent standard against which tetrapod evolution can be calibrated. Taking advantage of this high-resolution chronological framework, and growing understanding of both the timing and extent of the CPE in this sector of eastern Pangaea13,17,18, we here identify a significant Carnian shift in the composition of archosaur ichno-associations as recorded in the Southern Alps, which in turn provides the first well constrained date for the DDE in eastern Pangaea. Furthermore, we take advantage of new radiometric dating in western Pangaea9,10 to integrate the oldest dinosaur-bearing formations of the South America in this model, providing a globally coherent scenario for the DDE. Finally, we highlight the synchronicity of the DDE and CPE and suggest a possible causal relationship between the two.

Results and Discussion

Background on the early history of dinosaurs

The origin of Dinosauria is thought to have occurred in the mid- to high-latitudes of Gondwana19,20 (but see ref. 21). Although precise temporal calibration is to date unavailable, the Middle Triassic Manda beds of Tanzania yielded the remains of the possible oldest dinosaur, Nyasasaurus parringtoni22, as well as the silesaurid Asilisaurus23. Therefore, even if Nyasasaurus is not a dinosaur, Asilisaurus is definitely a silesaurid, and Silesauridae is the immediate sister-group to Dinosauria, so minimally extending the origin of dinosaurs to the mid Anisian, about 245 Ma. These early dates have been confirmed by reports of non-dinosaurian dinosauromorph tridactyl footprints from the late Olenekian and Anisian of Poland24, and other evidence from Italy, France, and Germany25.

These Early and Middle Triassic dates for the origin of dinosaurs were unexpected and new1. Until 2010, the oldest undisputed members of Dinosauria were from the late Carnian of the lower Ischigualasto Formation of Argentina26, whose age is radiometrically constrained between 231.4 ± 0.3 (Herr Toba bentonite) and 225.9 ± 0.9 Ma (Valle de la Luna Member)26. There, the presence of dinosaurs, such as Panphagia, Eoraptor, and Herrerasaurus in the basal horizons of the lower Ischigualasto Formation was used by Martínez and Alcober27 to suggest that Dinosauria originated during the Ladinian or earlier and that they were already well diversified in the early Carnian. The Hyperodapedon Assemblage Zone (AZ) of the Santa Maria Formation of southern Brazil yielded some of the earliest dinosaurs (e.g., Saturnalia and Staurikosaurus4) recently redated at 233.23 ± 0.73 Ma10. Two further early dinosaur-bearing formations, the lower (and upper) Maleri Formation of India28 and the Pebbly Arkose Formation of Zimbabwe4 are less constrained in age, and are thought to be Carnian by biostratigraphic correlation within the Hyperodapedon AZ4. These skeletal records of early dinosaurs document a time when they were not numerically abundant, comprising typically <5% of individual specimens in their faunas, and when they were still of modest body size2,3.

The DDE, indicated by dramatically increased relative faunal abundances worldwide and by body size increases in some forms, is documented by skeletal remains and footprints. The classic remains come from Europe. In the southern Germanic Basin, sauropodomorphs such as Sellosaurus and Plateosaurus dominate the Löwenstein and the Trossingen formations of mid-Norian age29, both in terms of size and abundance. Theropods radiated too, with Procompsognathus triassicus and Halticosaurus longotarsus from the middle part of the Löwenstein Formation and Liliensternus liliensterni from the Trossingen Formation29. Of mid-late Norian age are also the Polish theropod skeletal findings recently discussed by Niedźwiedzki et al.30. The British Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus-bearing fissure faunas, once thought to be Carnian in age are now considered as Rhaetian31. The Ansbacher Sandstein (Stuttgart Formation, upper Schilfsandstein) and the Coburger Sandstein (Hassberge Formation) yielded some of the oldest definitive footprints assigned to dinosaurs32 in this sector of Pangaea, which can be dated to the early to late Carnian (Julian-Tuvalian33). A single possible dinosaur footprint is known from the late Carnian of Monti Pisani in Central Italy34. Norian dinosaur footprints are then widespread in the Dolomia Principale/Hauptdolomit of the Alpine region between Switzerland and Italy25, and Poland-Slovakia (Tomanová Formation35). Large sauropodomorph tracks (Eosauropus and, possibly, Evazoum) have also been described recently from the Norian—early Rhaetian of Greenland36.

In all, data from Laurasia show that dinosaurs were relatively rare in the Late Triassic of north and north-western Pangaea for some 10 myr after their Carnian occurrence in South America2,5, and that they eventually became common from the Norian onwards. New data from the Dockum Group37, and footprint findings in the Germanic basin32, however, suggest that at least some dinosaur groups might have radiated synchronously across Pangaea37.

The early dinosaur record of North America has been hard to date. The dinosaur-rich Petrified Forest Member of the Chinle Formation of southwestern North American, once thought to be of similar age to the Ischigualasto Formation, has now been re-dated to the late Norian-Rhaetian5. The early dinosaur record of North America is therefore mainly documented by the Newark Supergroup, the upper Chinle Formation, and the Dockum Group. The late Triassic Newark Supergroup of eastern North America has yielded a sparse tetrapod body fossil record and no dinosaur remains, although dinosaur footprints have been repeatedly signalled38,39. Olsen and Huber40 reported the oldest dinosaur footprints from North America, dated to the late Carnian (Tuvalian), and associated with Brachychirotherium, and Apatopus. Cameron and Wood41 described the co-occurrence of Rhynchosauroides, Brachychirotherium, Atreipus and dinosaur footprints (Grallator) in the upper portion of the Wolfville Formation of Nova Scotia (Canada). Furthermore, Weems42 documented some dinosaur tracks (Eubrontes) from the Balls Bluff Siltstone in the Culpeper Basin of Virginia, considered Carnian-Norian in age. Camposaurus arizonensis43 is the oldest skeletal dinosaur evidence, from the lower part of the Chinle Formation, dated to ~220 Ma44, while Lepidus praecisio45 is the oldest dinosaur from the base of the Dockum Group, which is considered to be ?early Norian, although the age is only loosely constrained45. The Late Triassic Chinle Group yielded also abundant Grallator theropod tracks39 and one possible Eubrontes46. All these records are most probably Norian in age47.

In the southern hemisphere, Norian dinosaur remains are known relatively abundantly in the lower Elliott Formation of South Africa and the Los Colorados Formation of Argentina4. Dinosaur footprints (cf. Eubrontes) were reported from the Ipswich Coal Measures of Australia48, which can be dated to the late Carnian48 and that can be compared with similar findings from the Carnian-Norian Molteno Formation of South Africa49. The oldest skeletal remains from this sector of Gondwana are from the Lower Elliot Formation of South Africa which yielded basal dinosaurs, such as the sauropodomorphs Euskelosaurus, Melanorosaurus, Blikanasaurus, and Antetonitrus, and the ornithischian Eocursor50. The Los Colorados Formation is the source of the sauropodomorphs Riojasaurus, Coloradisaurus, and Lessemsaurus, and the theropods Zupaysaurus and Powellvenator. The coeval, or slightly younger, Quebrada del Barro Formation has produced a similar fauna, comprising a theropod, basal sauropodomorphs, and other reptiles, while the Laguna Colorada Formation (El Tranquilo Group) has yielded the sauropodomorph Mussaurus and a heterodontosaurid ornithischian4. The ages of the Lower Elliot, Quebrada del Barro, and Laguna Colorada formations are however poorly constrained to the Norian4. In the Lower Elliott Formation (Norian-Rhaetian), Ellenberger51 reported also a variety of footprint morphotypes, some of which can be attributed to dinosaurs52. Of probable late Carnian age are the dinosaur footprints discovered in the Timezgadiouine Formation of Morocco and assigned to Eubrontes and Grallator53.

Chronological constraints in the Dolomites region

The stratigraphy of the Southern Alps and of the Dolomites in particular encompasses the whole Triassic system, providing an extraordinary record of the environments and ecosystems constrained by an excellent bio-chrono-stratigraphic framework (Fig. 1), particularly for the early Anisian to late Carnian interval, which has made this area a reference worldwide for the Triassic timescale. During this time, the Southern Alps (Fig. 2) were located at tropical latitudes in the western Tethys region (about 15–18° North54), which was characterized by a complex palaeogeography, with narrow ocean branches separated by carbonate platforms or emerged lands. Overall, the Southern Alps faced an ocean towards the present-day east and were characterised by the presence of an emerged land (Adriatic foreland) towards the present-day south16. The Southern Alps area was a wide shallow sea during the late Permian and Early Triassic, but started to differentiate at the beginning of the early-middle Anisian. Later, a sudden increase in subsidence combined with a strong sea level rise allowed a general deepening, associated with the formation of high-relief carbonate buildups and a general retreat of the siliciclastic shoreline. Subsidence rates reached a climax during the late Anisian, and at that time the palaeogeography of the Dolomites and Lombardy featured numerous small isolated carbonate platforms (Sciliar and Esino formations) surrounded by a deep basin (Buchenstein Formation).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Stratigraphy in the Italian Dolomites, and dating the dinosaur diversification event. Footprint occurrences within the chrono-stratigraphic framework of the middle and upper Triassic of the Dolomites (Southern Alps, NE Italy), and the derived abundances of dinosaurian, non-dinosaurian dinosauromorph and crurotarsan trackmakers within the associations A1, A2, and A3 described in the text. Note the correlation between the change in composition of the associations and the climate shifts (climate trend and zones after ref. 11). Lithostratigraphic abbreviations: ADZ: Zoppè Sandstone; AQT: Acquatona Formation; BHL: Livinallongo/Buchenstein Formation; BIV: Bivera Formation; CTR: Contrin Formation; DCS: Cassian Dolomite; DON: Dont Formation; DPR: Dolomia Principale; FCL: Coll’Alto dark Limestones; GLS: Gracilis Formation; HKS: Heiligkreuz Formation; IMF: Fernazza Formation and volcanites; MBT: Ambata Formation; MNA: Moena Formation; MRB/RIC: Richthofen Conglomerate and Morbiac dark Limestone; NTR: Monte Rite Formation; PPS: Piz da Peres Conglomerate; REC: Recoaro Limestone; SCI: Sciliar Formation; SCS: San Cassiano Formation; SLI: Lower Serla Dolomite; SLS Upper Serla Formation; TVZ: Travenanzes Formation; VTG: Voltago Conglomerate; WEN: Wengen Formation. Lithologies: a cherty limestone; b sandstone; c sandy limestone; d volcanics; e oolitic-bioclastic limestone; f black platy limestone or dolostone, black shale; g dolostone; h marlstone, claystone and shale; i marly limestone; j conglomerate. Ages from GTS timescale, modified after refs12, 91, 92. The silhouette images were created by the authors for use in this paper

Fig. 2
figure 2

Early-late Carnian (Late Triassic) palaeogeographic reconstruction. a World map, showing palaeogeography in the late Triassic, and the main vertebrate-bearing units mentioned in the text. Abbreviations: CEB: Central European Basin; Ch: Chinle/Dockum Group; E: Molteno and Lower Elliot Formation (South Africa); I: Ischigualasto Formation; Ip: Ipswich Coal Measures (Australia); LC: Los Colorados Formation (Argentina); N: Newark basin; SA: Southern Alps; T: Timezgadiouine Formation (Morocco); Wolfville Formation (Nova Scotia, Canada). b Palaeogeographic map of western Europe showing land and sea, and main tectonic blocks. Abbreviations (BS: Basin; MS: Massif): ABR: Lazio-Abruzzi platform; ANT: Antalya; BAL: Balearic Islands; BEY: Beydaglari autochtonous; BRAB: Brabham Massif; BRIAN: Brianconnaise; CAL: Calabria; CARP Carpatian; DR-IV: Drina-Ivanica Zone; EH: Ebro High; JEF: Jeffara rift; K.C.Z.: Krasta-Cukali Zone; MAG: Maghrebian rift; NCA: Northern Calcareous Alps; RIFKAB: Rif-Kabylies nappe; SMM: Serbo-Macedonian Massif; TDR: Transdanubian Range; TUSC: Tuscany. The Fig. 2a map was modified from ref. 18 with permission from the Elsevier. All rights reserved. The Fig. 2b map was created by the authors using ArcGIS

From late Ladinian to early Carnian, the subsidence rate decreased, resulting in the progradation of the southern shoreline and a general shallowing of the basins. At that time, the palaeogeography was characterized by large emerged areas to the south-south-west, bounded by attached carbonate platforms and small isolated platforms in the north-eastern Southern Alps55. This regressive trend culminated in the late Carnian, with a strong north-eastward shift of the coastline and complete flattening of the palaeotopography, matched by a climatically driven increase in siliciclastic input56, restoring a relative homogeneity in sedimentary palaeoenvironments57, as documented by the Heiligkreuz and Travenanzes formations. A new transgression in the latest Carnian allowed the deposition of the thick peritidal succession of the Dolomia Principale, which records a huge regional platform that extended for hundreds of kilometres from north to south and east to west58. Widespread carbonate platforms then characterised the Southern Alps for several million years, from the late Carnian to (at least) the late Norian.

Primary and secondary palaeoclimate indicators56,59 suggest a generally arid climate with elevated temperatures, interrupted by short “humid shifts” (Fig. 1). The most important humid episode occurred during the early Carnian. This episode, marked at the base by a sharp negative carbon-isotope excursion of about 4‰17,18, is documented by multi-proxy evidence of increased rainfall as a sudden increase of coarse and immature siliciclastics into the basin, humid paleosols, hygrophytic pollen assemblages, and massive resin production60,61. It is also associated with the abrupt demise of high-relief microbial carbonate platforms59. All these factors have been interpreted as regional evidence for the CPE17,18,56.

It should be noted that the CPE is characterised in the Italian Dolomites by at least four humid pulses before the return to arid conditions59,61 and has great biostratigraphic control18,56,60,61, being constrained between the Aonoides/Austriacum boundary interval (about Julian) and the base of the Subbullatus Zone (Tuvalian), an interval of about 1.6/1.7 myr around 234–232 Ma (Fig. 1).

The CPE, documented in the Dolomites by the Heiligkreuz Formation, can be matched in other palaeogeographic settings around the western border of the Tethys Gulf with the Lunz Formation and the Raibler Schichten in the Northern Calcareous Alps61,62, the Veszprem Marls and the Sandhoregy Formation in the Trans-Danubian Range18 and the Stuttgart Formation and equivalents in the Germanic basin33. The marine Southern Alpine record of the CPE can be compared with coeval terrestrial British facies, where several thin sandstone units sit within the mainly mudstone-dominated Mercia Mudstone Group of the West Midlands, Somerset, and Dorset. Borehole records of the latter show at least five short-lived carbon isotope excursions spanning an estimated 1.09 myr63, all of which provide evidence of a good match with the records from Italy. Although some regions of Pangaea are still understudied, the CPE was most probably a global event15 that corresponds to one of the most severe biotic crises in the history of life64.

A Carnian dinosaur shift in tetrapod ichno-associations

In the Italian Southern Alps, the record of tetrapod ichno-associations is more or less continuous from the late Carboniferous to early Jurassic. Only during the latest Permian, latest Anisian and Ladinian is there no evidence of tetrapod traces from the Southern Alps, associated with the general retreat of the shoreline and/or the presence of isolated platforms. In the Julian to Norian interval, attached platforms and marginal marine environments became widespread in the region, associated with the common peritidal environment. Here, various groups of tetrapods became common, as evidenced by the numerous ichnosites discovered in the last decades. Three main ichnoassemblages can be distinguished: a Crurotarsi-dominated assemblage in the Julian, early Carnian (A1), a mixed assemblage in the Tuvalian, late Carnian (A2) and a dinosaur-dominated assemblage in the late Tuvalian–Norian (A3) (Fig. 1).

Assemblage 1: Crurotarsi-dominated, Julian. Five ichnosites of Julian age record the presence of tetrapods in the region. The Val Sabbia Sandstone Formation yielded well-preserved trackways assigned to the ichnogenus Brachychirotherium, known to have been produced by quadrupedal crurotarsan archosaurs65. Crurotarsan tracks (Chirotheriidae) were reported66 in the uppermost Cassian Dolomite (Aonoides Zone, Julian), as in the Busa dei Cavai (Mondeval), Nuvolau and Settsass sites. In all, these Julian sites provide evidence for crurotarsan dominance (80–100%) of early Carnian tetrapod associations in the Southern Alps region.

Assemblage 2: Mixed Crurotarsi—Dinosauria, early Tuvalian. Six ichnosites of early Tuvalian age record mixed archosaur ichno-associations and the oldest occurrence of dinosaurs in the region. Small tridactyl footprints assigned to the ichnogenus Grallator and attributed to theropod dinosaurs are dominant in the Travenanzes Formation of the San Gottardo site67 and co-occur with the tridactyl Atreipus-like footprints, attributed to dinosauriforms67, and the tetradactyl Evazoum, attributed either to sauropodomorphs68 or crurotarsans69. A single-pentadactyl track assigned to Brachychirotherium70 testifies to the presence of crurotarsan archosaurs. Crurotarsan archosaurs (e.g., Brachychirotherium) also occur in the Heiligkreuz/Travenanzes formations of the Mostizzolo ichnosite71, together with a large Eubrontes track, attributed to a dinosaurian trackmaker70. Large dinosaur footprints (foot length = 26–27 cm), attributed to Eubrontes, were also described by Bernardi et al.70 from the Monte Roen site of similar age. These specimens indicate the presence of large dinosaurs, ca. 5 m long70. Footprints referred to prosauropods have been reported66 in situ in the Heiligkreuz Formation of Lastoi di Formin and in erratic blocks in the locality Vare di Giau (Giau Pass); a single tridactyl footprints attributed to a small theropod has been found in the Sasso della Croce (Heiligkreuz Formation). Unnamed archosaurian footprints showing affinities with the ichnogenus Brachychirotherium, associated with nesting structures, are also known from the Monticello Member (Dolomia Principale) of Tuvalian age in the Dogna Valley site72. Finally, an enigmatic quadrupedal trackway from the Ciol de la Fratta site (Carnian Pre-Alps), of late Carnian age, has been referred to a large crurotarsan trackmaker73. A similar mixed association has been described also from the Carnian of Lerici (La Spezia)68, but the lack of precise temporal constraint prevents any further discussion of these data, and they are therefore omitted from calculations. In all, early Tuvalian sites provide evidence for the oldest dinosaurs in western Pangaea and for a mixed faunal composition, with 40% of specimens being dinosaur tracks, 10% non-dinosaurian dinosauromorph tracks, and 50% crurotarsan tracks.

Assemblage 3: Dinosaur-dominated, late Tuvalian-Norian. More than ten ichnosites of late Tuvalian to Norian age, all in the Dolomia Principale, are evidence for the abundant presence of dinosaurs in the Southern Alps. Numerous dinosaur footprints were described74 from the Mt. Pelmetto ichnosite, which also yielded a single Brachychirotherium-like footprint75, and another in the same rock slide66. The trampled horizon can be constrained to the lowermost part of the Dolomia Principale directly overlying the Travenanzes Formation, and can be dated to the late Tuvalian57. A Eubrontes-Grallator association was also described76 from the Tre Cime site, and dinosaur-only associations were described also in the Friuli and Carnic Prealps77. All these can be dated to the late Carnian-Norian by means of stratigraphic position. An association of Evazoum, Eubrontes and Grallator was also reported78 from the Pasubio Massif, whose Norian (Alaunian) age is established by conodont biostratigraphy. A mixed chirotheroid—dinosaur footprint association was also reported from the Val Pegolera66 outcrop and a dinosaur-dominated Atreipus-Grallator association was described from the Moiazza ichnosite66. All late Triassic ichnosites of late Tuvalian to Norian age provide evidence for dinosaur dominance, with >90% of tracks being assignable to dinosaurian trackmakers.

Dinosur diversification and the Carnian Pluvial Episode

The early evolution of dinosaurs has recently attracted much interest, with new discoveries79, new phylogenies20,21 and new theoretical models and computational tools1 radically enhancing our understanding of the tempo and mode of origination, early diversification, and dispersal of this group. As discussed above, however, with a few notable exceptions5,6,9, the lack of independent age dating for most specimens has hindered any attempt to reconstruct the precise sequence of events, blurring our understanding of the earliest phases of dinosaur evolution.

The occurrence of several precisely dated ichnoassemblages in the late Triassic of the Southern Alps allows us to constrain the timing of the DDE in this region of Pangaea. In a relatively brief interval of about 3-4 myr (around early/late Carnian), dinosaurs shifted from near or complete absence (0% in the Cassian Dolomite/Val Sabbia Sandstone association of Julian age) to notable presence (ca. 40% of the Heiligkreuz-Travenanzes formations association of early Tuvalian age), to ecological dominance (>90% of the Dolomia Principale association of late Tuvalian and Norian age). Although new discoveries might slightly modify these percentages, it is improbable that the differences between the three assemblages could be the result of sampling biases, because no single dinosaur footprint has ever been found below the CPE in the Southern Alps and very few crurotarsan footprints have been found after the CPE, despite intensive sampling in the last 40 years. Further, this percentage shift in the relative abundances of dinosaurs estimated from tracks and trackways confirms figures noted by earlier authors2,3 based on counts of skeletons, and showing a shift in relative dinosaurian abundance from 5–10% to 70–90% through the DDE.

The explosive increase in dinosaurian abundance in terrestrial ecosystems, which had been dated variously to the Carnian and Norian in other parts of the world, is therefore constrained in the Southern Alpine region to the early-Late Carnian (early Tuvalian), an order-of-magnitude improvement of dating precision over most earlier work.

The U-Pb dating of the Argentinian Chañares Formation has been used6 to suggest that the shift from assemblages containing only dinosaur precursors to those with early dinosaurs occurred, in the high latitudes of Gondwana, between the early and late Carnian and took <5 myr. Similarly, recent U-Pb dating of the Santa Maria Formation and the Caturrita Formation in Brazil10 constrained the first dinosaur diversification in the region between 233 and 225 Ma. Our analysis of the Italian Dolomites supports this timing and provides a high-resolution chronological framework for this event. It also suggests that the first major dinosaur diversification might have been a synchronous event across all Pangaea. The oldest widespread dinosaur evidence is provided by footprints recorded in the Heiligkreuz Formation of the Southern Alps, in the Ansbacher Sandstein of the Germanic Basin32 and in the Los Rastros Formation in Argentina80, which can all be dated to the late early Carnian and is soon followed by skeletal evidence in western Pangaea6,10 (Fig. 3). Both in Gondwana (Ischigualasto, Caturrita, Los Colorados, Lower Elliot formations) and Laurasia (Dolomia Principale, Löwenstein, Trossingen formations), dinosaurs then dominated through the Norian81 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between the earliest dinosaur occurrences across Pangaea. Note the synchronicity of the first dinosaur diversification event during and after the CPE (light green boxes). Lithostratigraphic abbreviations. Dolomites: DCS: Cassian Dolomite; DPR: Dolomia Principale; HKS: Heiligkreuz Formation; SCS: San Cassiano Formation; TVZ: Travenanzes Formation; WEN: Wengen Formation. CEB (Central European Basin): ARN: Arnstadt Formation; BENK: Benk Formation; GRA: Grabfeld Formation; LÖV: Löwenstein Formation; STU: Stuttgart Formation; TRO: Trossingen Formation; WES: Weser Formation. Ischigualasto Basin: CH: Chañares Formation; IS: Ischigualasto Formation; LC: Los Colorados Formation; LS: Los Rastros Formation. Lithostratigraphy of CEB from Stratigraphische Tabellen von Deutschland 2016 ( Red Star: Aglianico-Tuff, Lagonegro Basin13; Blue Star: Rio Nigra Tuff, Dolomites93; Green Star: Radiometric ages from Ischigualasto Basin (from Ezcurra et al.9 and those published in ref. 6). Archosaur silhouettes: skeletal data; Footprint silhouettes: ichnological data; Light blue: dinosaurs; Yellow: non-dinosaurian dinosauromorphs; Orange: crurotarsans. Fossil occurrences from refs. 4, 6, 9, 25, 29, 32, 65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73, 76,77,78, 80. Ages as in Fig. 1. The silhouette images were created by the authors for use in this paper

The CPE14,15,17 marks an important phase of climate destabilisation. Abrupt environmental changes, such as warming, ocean acidification, mega-monsoonal conditions, and a generalised increase in rainfall are observed in the geological record worldwide during this time15,18,82 and these phenomena were synchronous with a carbon-cycle perturbation17,18 that could be linked to the Wrangellia Large Igneous Province volcanism17. The CPE is characterised by elevated extinction rates in several marine groups such as crinoids, scallops, corals, ammonoids, and conodonts, and an abrupt interruption in organic carbonate production in shelf settings (reviewed in ref. 15); it is considered among the most severe biotic crises in the history of life64. On the other hand, this event coincides with the appearance of the first abundant pelagic calcifiers and of scleractinian corals83,84, the radiation of modern conifers85 and the diversification of archosaurs which replaced the then-abundant herbivorous rhynchosaurs and dicynodonts3, possibly reflecting the diversification of conifers and the decline of Dicrodium seedferns.

Data presented here suggest that the first dinosaur dispersal in eastern Pangaea and the DDE are synchronous with the CPE and that dinosaurs became dominant only after this perturbation (Figs. 1 and 3). In the Southern Alps, in fact, dinosaurs are absent in the Julian formations, which are older than the CPE (Cassian Dolomite and Val Sabbia Sandstone; ca. 236 Ma), and appear in the overlying Heiligkreuz-Travenanzes formations, which are coeval or slightly younger than the Episode (ca. 234 Ma) to become dominant just a few million years later, at the base of the Dolomia Principale (ca. 230 Ma).

This pattern is also matched by the first occurrence of dinosaurs in the Germanic Basin32, within the Ansbacher Sandstein (Stuttgart Formation, upper Schilfsandstein), which correlate with the Heiligkreuz Formation and represent the regional expression of the CPE. The same pattern can also be recognized in South America, where the first occurrence of dinosaurs is in the Los Rastros Formation80. This unit, which records a sharp shift from fluvial to lacustrine, and then back to fluvial conditions, unconformably follows the Chañares Formation, recently9 assigned to the Carnian through radioisotopic dating of detrital zircons (ages 233.7 and 236.1 Ma). The Los Rastros Formation is overlaid by the Ischigualasto Formation, which is constrained by a 40Ar/39Ar date of 231.4 ± 0.3 Ma from a tuff near the base of the unit. This chronostratigraphic framework allows correlation of the continental sections of South America and the Tethyan sections (Fig. 3). Moreover, the most recent radioisotope dating6,9 and magnetostratigraphic correlation with the Newark astrochronological polarity timescale81 strongly support the synchronicity between the humid event as recorded in Europe (Fig. 3) and the biotic turnover recorded in the various basins. We hasten to point out that the signature of the CPE in Southern Pangea has yet to be verified through detailed stratigraphic studies. However, we note that the shift to more humid environments is documented in the Los Rastros Formation both by sedimentological and palynological evidence86,87, that this formation records the earliest evidence of dinosaurs80, and that it is overlain by the Ischigualasto Formation where dinosaurs became abundant (Fig. 3), mirroring the pattern and showing temporal synchronicity with the eastern Pangaea record and in particular with the Southern Alpine Heiligkreuz and Travenanzes formations, where dinosaurs appeared and started to become dominant, providing evidence for possible comparable macroevolutionary dynamics throughout the whole of Pangaea. Notably, the first dinosaur diversification in southern Brazil, which occurred in the late Carnian10, was recently suggested to be linked with the climatic oscillations of the CPE, although no conclusive supporting geological evidence is to date available10. Our model supports these intuitions and provides a new framework for interpreting these and other early dinosaur-bearing faunas.

To date, uncertainties in dating of the best known early dinosaur association obscured this pattern (but see refs. 10,88) and prevented a test for coincidence between the CPE and the DDE, although geologists repeatedly hypothesised this13. Unfortunately, the chronostratigraphic precision available in the Southern Alps and partially in South America is currently unavailable in other parts of the world, so preventing a global verification of this hypothesis at the moment.

More studies are needed to demonstrate a causal link between the CPE and the DDE, but we note that the link is plausible in that both environmental factors (e.g., a more humid tropical belt, and more emergent land created by the infilling of the basins) and biological factors (high turnover in ecosystems, vegetation change) are possible drivers of a rapid dispersal and diversification of the dinosaurs.

Finally, we note that the most recent palaeogeographic models suggest that dinosaurs diversified at middle to high palaeolatitudes6,19,20 and that they eventually became dominant at tropical palaeolatitudes much later, possibly in the Norian. However, the well dated evidence presented here indicates that dinosaurs were present in northern Pangaea at least from the late Carnian, and that soon after their arrival in the region they became dominant in their ecosystems. The coexistence of dinosaurs, dinosauriforms and crurotarsan archosaurs, therefore, was also more prolonged than thought, and began at least in the middle Carnian. This provides support for the view that crurotarsan-dominated faunas were substituted by a gradual process of ecological replacement1,2,23,26 that might have been accelerated by the ecological reshuffling ignited by the Carnian Pluvial Episode, which triggered the extinction of key herbivores, including rhynchosaurs and most dicynodonts3,8, and the first diversification of dinosaurs.


Identification criteria

We reviewed all published tetrapod tracks described in the last decades from the Southern Alps and re-assessed their stratigraphic positions and ages, based on the most recent biostratigraphic schemes. Ichnogenera/morphotypes were attributed to three major groups (i.e., crurotarsans, non-dinosaurian dinosauromorphs, and dinosaurs) on the basis of personal study and published papers.

The attribution of Mesozoic tridactyl prints to Dinosauria is customary52, although possibly incorrect. This morphotype cannot in fact be unambiguously assigned to dinosaurs as at least some non-dinosaurian dinosauromorphs possessed a functionally tridactyl pes89. Dinosaur tracks are however recognised on the basis of several synapomorphies: (i) dominance of the digit II–IV group, (ii) mesaxonic pattern of foot structure, (iii) digit I reduced and shifted backwards (and thus often not preserved in tracks), (iv) bunched metatarsus, and (v) tendency towards digitigrady2,90. These characters are present in all dinosaur footprints cited herein. Furthermore, although we do not discuss any specific attribution within Dinosauria, theropod-like footprints can be recognised on the basis of the following characters: (i) asymmetry of the track, with angle between digit III and II lower than between III and IV, (ii) digit III longer than IV > II, (iii) sharp claw traces on all digits, (iv) tip of digit II turned inwards, and (v) bipedalism70. Presence of these characters in the specimens studied here is therefore at least supporting evidence for a dinosaurian producer.

The abundance of the various trackmakers in the ecosystems has been calculated as the percentage of specimens attributed to each trackmaker for each site. We considered a “specimen” as each single evidence of the presence of a tetrapod, whether a track (=single print) or a trackway (=multiple prints) assignable to a single ichnotaxon.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. 1.

    Benton, M. J., Forth, J. & Langer, M. C. Models for the rise of the dinosaurs. Curr. Biol. 24, R87–R95 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Brusatte, S. L. et al. The origin and early radiation of dinosaurs. Earth Sci. Rev. 101, 68–100 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Benton, M. J. Dinosaur success in the Triassic: a noncompetitive ecological model. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 29–55 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Langer, M. C., Ezcurra, M. D., Bittencourt, J. S. & Novas, F. E. The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs. Biol. Rev. 85, 55–110 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Irmis, R. B., Mundil, R., Martz, J. W. & Parker, W. G. High-resolution U-Pb ages from the Upper Triassic Chinle Formation (New Mexico, USA) support a diachronous rise of dinosaurs. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 309, 258–267 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Marsicano, C. A., Irmis, R. B., Mancuso, A. C., Mundil, R. & Chemale, F. The precise temporal calibration of dinosaur origins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 509–513 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Colbert, E. S. The Age of Reptiles. (W.W. Norton, New York, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Benton, M. J. Late Triassic extinctions and the origin of the dinosaurs. Science 260, 769–770 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ezcurra, M. D. et al. Deep faunistic turnovers preceded the rise of dinosaurs in southwestern Pangaea. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1477–1483 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Langer, M. C., Ramezani, J. & Da Rosa, Á. A. S. U-Pb age constraints on dinosaur rise from south Brazil. Gondwana Res. 57, 133–140 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Muttoni, G. et al. Tethyan magnetostratigraphy from Pizzo Mondello (Sicily) and correlation to the Late Triassic Newark astrochronological polarity time scale. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 116, 1043–1058 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kent, D. V., Olsen, P. E. & Muttoni, G. Astrochronostratigraphic polarity time scale (APTS) for the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic from continental sediments and correlation with standard marine stages. Earth Sci. Rev. 166, 153–180 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Furin, S. et al. High- precision U-Pb zircon age from the Triassic of Italy: implications for the Triassic time scale and the Carnian origin of calcareous nannoplankton and dinosaurs. Geology 34, 1009–1012 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Simms, M. J. & Ruffell, A. H. Synchroneity of climatic change and extinctions in the late Triassic. Geology 17, 265–268 (1989).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ruffell, A., Simms, M. J. & Wignall, P. B. The Carnian Humid Episode of the Late Triassic: a review. Geol. Mag. 153, 271–284 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gianolla, P., Ragazzi, E. & Roghi, G. Upper Triassic amber from the Dolomites (Northern Italy). A paleoclimatic indicator? Riv. Ital. Paleontol. S. 104, 381–390 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dal Corso, J. et al. Discovery of a major negative δ13C spike in the Carnian (Late Triassic) linked to the eruption of Wrangellia flood basalts. Geology 40, 79–82 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Dal Corso, J. et al. Carbon isotope records reveal synchronicity between carbon cycle perturbation and the “Carnian Pluvial Event” in the Tethys realm (Late Triassic). Glob. Planet. Change 127, 79–90 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Whiteside, J. H. et al. Extreme ecosystem instability suppressed tropical dinosaur dominance for 30 million years. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7909–7913 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Langer, M. C. et al. Untangling the dinosaur family tree. Nature 551, E1–E3 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Baron, M. G., Norman, D. B. & Barrett, P. M. A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution. Nature 543, 501–506 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nesbitt, S. J., Barrett, P. M., Werning, S., Sidor, C. A. & Charig, A. J. The oldest dinosaur? A Middle Triassic dinosauriform from Tanzania. Biol. Lett. 9, 20120949 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nesbitt, S. J. et al. Ecologically distinct dinosaurian sister group shows early diversification of Ornithodira. Nature 464, 95–98 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brusatte, S. L., Niedzwiedzki, G. & Butler, R. J. Footprints pull origin and diversification of dinosaur stem lineage deep into Early Triassic. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 278, 1107–1113 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lockley, M. & Meyer, C. Dinosaur tracks and other fossil footprints of Europe (Columbia University Press, New York, 2000).

  26. 26.

    Martínez, R. N. et al. A basal dinosaur from the dawn of the dinosaur era in southwestern Pangaea. Science 331, 206–210 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Martinez, R. N. & Alcober, O. A. A basal sauropodomorph (Dinosauria: Saurischia) from the Ischigualasto Formation (Triassic, Carnian) and the early evolution of Sauropodomorpha. PLoS ONE 4, e4397 (2009).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Novas, F. E., Ezcurra, M. D., Chatterjee, S. & Kutty, T. S. New dinosaur species from the Upper Triassic Upper Maleri and Lower Dharmaram formations of Central India. Earth Environ. Sci. Trans. R. Soc. 101, 333–349 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rauhut, O. W. M. & Hungerbühler, A. A review of European Triassic theropods. Gaia 15, 75–88 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Niedźwiedzki, G., Brusatte, S. L., Sulej, T. & Butler, R. J. Basal dinosauriform and theropod dinosaurs from the mid-late Norian (Late Triassic) of Poland: implications for Triassic dinosaur evolution and distribution. Palaeontology 57, 1121–1142 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Whiteside, D. I., Duffin, C. J., Gill, P. G., Marshall, J. E. A. & Benton, M. J. The Late Triassic and Early Jurassic fissure faunas from Bristol and South Wales. Palaeontol. Pol. 67, 257–287 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Haubold, H. & Klein, H. Chirotherien und Grallatoriden aus der Unteren bis Oberen Trias Mitteleuropas und die Entstehung der Dinosauria. Hallesch-. Jahrb. Geowiss. B 24, 1–22 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Franz, M., Nowak, K., Berner, U., Heunisch, C. & Wolfgramm, M. Eustatic control on epicontinental basins: The example of the Stuttgart Formation in the Central European Basin (Middle Keuper, Late Triassic). Glob. Planet. Change 122, 305–329 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Leonardi, G. In Dinosauri in Italia (eds G. Leonardi, G. & Mietto, P.) 275–295 (Accademia Editoriale, Roma, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Niedźwiedzki, G. A late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 56, 291–300 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lallensack, J. N. et al. Sauropodomorph dinosaur trackways from the Fleming Fjord Formation of East Greenland: evidence for Late Triassic sauropods. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 62, 833–843 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sarıgül, V. New archosauromorph fragments from the Dockum Group of Texas and assessment of the earliest dinosaurs in North America. Hist. Biol. (2017).

  38. 38.

    Baird, D. Chirotherium lulli, a pseudosuchian reptile from New Jersey. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 111, 115–192 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lucas, S. G. & Tanner, L. H. The nonmarine Triassic–Jurassic boundary in the Newark Supergroup of eastern North America. Earth Sci. Rev. 84, 1–20 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Olsen, P. E. & Huber, P. The oldest Late Triassic footprint assemblage from North America (Pekin Formation, Deep River Basin, North Carolina, USA). Southeast Geol. 38, 77–90 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cameron, B. & Wood, N. A comparison of the late Triassic dinosaur footprints Atreipus acadicus and Grallator (Grallator) sp. From the upper Wolfville formation at North Medford, Nova Scotia. Min. Matters 2004, 4 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Weems, R. E. A late Triassic footprint fauna from the Culpeper Basin, northern Virginia (USA). Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 77, 1–79 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hunt, A. P., Lucas, S. G., Heckert, A. B., Sullivan, R. M. & Lockley, M. G. Late Triassic dinosaurs from the western United States. Geobios 31, 511–531 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ramezani, J., Fastovsky, D. E. & Bowring, S. A. Revised chronostratigraphy of the Lower Chinle Formation strata in Arizona and New Mexico (USA): high-precision U-Pb geochronological constraints on the Late Triassic evolution of dinosaurs. Am. J. Sci. 314, 981–1008 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nesbitt, S. J. & Ezcurra, M. D. The early fossil record of dinosaurs in North America: a new neotheropod from the base of the Upper Triassic Dockum Group of Texas. Acta Palaentol. Pol. 60, 513–526 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Martin, A. J. & Hasiotis, S. T. Vertebrate tracks and their significance in the Chinle Formation (Late Triassic), Petrified Forest National Park. Nat. Park Serv. Geol. Res. Div. Tech. Rep. 98, 138–143 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lucas, S. G. & Tanner, L. H. Tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Triassic–Jurassic transition on the southern Colorado Plateau, USA. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 244, 242–256 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Thulborn, T. Australia’s earliest theropods: footprint evidence in the Ipswich Coal Measures (Upper Triassic) of Queensland. Gaia 15, 301–311 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Raath, M. A., Kitching, J. W., Shone, R. W. & Rossouw, G. J. Dinosaur tracks in Triassic Molteno sediments: the earliest evidence of dinosaurs in South Africa? Palaeontol. Afr. 27, 89–95 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Butler, R. J., Smith, R. M. H. & Norman, D. B. A primitive ornithischian dinosaur from the Late Triassic of South Africa, and the early evolution and diversification of Ornithischia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 274, 2041–2046 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ellenberger, P. Contribution à la classification des pistes de vertébrés du Trias: les types du Stormberg d’Afrique du Sud (I). In Palæovertebrata: Mémoire extraordinaire 1–152 (Laboratoire de paléontologie des vertébrés, Montpellier, 1972).

  52. 52.

    Lucas, S. G. et al. Triassic-Jurassic stratigraphic distribution of the theropod footprint ichnogenus Eubrontes. Bull. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 37, 86–93 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lagnaoui, A. et al. Late Triassic tetrapod-dominated ichnoassemblages from the Argana Basin (Western High Atlas Morocco). Ichnos 19, 238–253 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Muttoni, G., Dallanave, E. & Channell, J. E. T. The drift history of Adria and Africa from 280 Ma to Present, Jurassic true polar wander, and zonal climate control on Tethyan sedimentary facies. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 386, 415–435 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Berra, F., Jadoul, F., Binda, M. & Lanfranchi, A. Large-scale progradation, demise and rebirth of a high-relief carbonate platform (Triassic, Lombardy Southern Alps, Italy). Sediment. Geol. 239, 48–63 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Breda, A. et al. The Carnian Pluvial Event in the Tofane area (Cortina d’Ampezzo, Dolomites, Italy). Geo. Alp. 6, 80–115 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Breda, A. & Preto, N. Anatomy of an upper Triassic continental to marginal-marine system: the mixed siliciclastic-carbonate Travenanzes Formation (Dolomites, Northern Italy). Sedimentology 58, 1613–1647 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bosellini, A. & Hardie, L. A. Facies e cicli della Dolomia Principale delle Alpi Venete. Mem. Soc. Geol. It. 30, 245–266 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Stefani, M., Furin, S. & Gianolla, P. The changing climate framework and depositional dynamics of Triassic carbonate platforms from the Dolomites. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 290, 43–57 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Preto, N. & Hinnov, L. A. Unravelling the origin of shallow-water cyclothems in the Upper Triassic Dürrenstein Formation (Dolomites, Italy). J. Sediment Res. 73, 774–789 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Roghi, G., Gianolla, P., Minarelli, L., Pilati, C. & Preto, N. Palynological correlation of Carnian humid pulses throughout westernTethys. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 290, 89–106 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hornung, T., Krystyn, L. & Brandner, R. A Tethys-wide mid-Carnian (Upper Triassic) carbonate productivity crisis: evidence for the Alpine Reingraben Event from Spiti (Indian Himalaya)? J. Asian Earth Sci. 30, 285–302 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Miller, C. S. et al. Astronomical age constraints and extinction mechanisms of the late Triassic Carnian crisis. Sci. Rep. 7, 2557 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bond, D. P. G. & Grasby, S. E. On the causes of mass extinctions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 478, 3–29 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Petti, F. M. et al. Late Triassic (early-middle Carnian) crurotarsan tracks from the Val Sabbia Sandstone (eastern Lombardy, Brescian Prealps, Northern Italy). Riv. Ital. Paleontol. S. 115, 277–290 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Mietto, P., Belvedere, M., Barbuni, M. In Recenti scoperte sulle impronte di dinosauro nelle Dolomiti(ed. Angelini, F. A.) 109pp (Treviso, 2012).

  67. 67.

    D’Orazi Porchetti, S., Nicosia, U., Mietto, P., Petti, F. M. & Avanzini, M. Atreipus-like footprints and their co-occurrence with Evazoum from the upper Carnian (Tuvalian) of Trentino-Alto Adige. Stud. Trentini Sci. Nat. Acta Geol. 83, 277–287 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Nicosia, U. & Loi, M. Triassic footprints from Lerici (La Spezia, Northern Italy). Ichnos 10, 127–140 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Klein, H., Lucas, S. G. & Haubold, H. Tetrapod track assemblage of the Redonda Formation (Upper Triassic, Chinle Group) in east-central New Mexico - re-evaluation of ichnofaunal diversity from studies of new material. Bull. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 37, 241–250 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bernardi, M., Petti, F. M., D’Orazi Porchetti, S. & Avanzini, M. Large tridactyl footprints associated with a diverse ichnofauna from the Carnian of Southern Alps. Bull. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 61, 48–54 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Avanzini, M., Petti, F. M., Bernardi, M. & Tomasoni, R. Crocodyle-like footprints from the Upper Triassic (Carnian) of the Italian Southern Alps. Bull. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 51, 61–64 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Dalla Vecchia, F. M. Segnalazione di probabili piste di fitosauro (Reptilia, Archosauria) nel Carnico superiore della Val Dogna (Udine). Paleocronache 1, 46–49 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Dalla Vecchia, F. M. The tetrapod fossil record from the Norian-Rhaetian of Friuli (northeastern Italy). Bull. New Mex. Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci. 37, 432–444 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Mietto, P. Piste di Dinosauri nella Dolomia Principale (Triassico superiore) del Monte Pelmetto (Cadore). Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 30, 307–310 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Leonardi, G. & Mietto, P. Dinosauri in Italia (Accademia Editoriale, Rome, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mietto, P. In Dinosaurs. Il mondo dei dinosauri (ed. Muscio, G.) 83–87 (Grafiche Manfrini, Calliano, Trento, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Marzola, M. & Dalla Vecchia, F. M. New dinosaur tracks from the Dolomia Principale (Upper Triassic) of the Carnic Prealps (Friuli-Venezia Giulia, NE Italy). B. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 53, 1–18 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Belvedere, M., Avanzini, M., Mietto, P. & Rigo, M. Norian dinosaur footprints from the “Strada delle Gallerie” (Monte Pasubio, NE Italy). Stud. Trentini Sci. Nat. Acta Geol. 83, 267–276 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Nesbitt, S. J. et al. The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan. Nature 544, 484–487 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Marsicano, C. A., Domnanovich, N. S. & Mancuso, A. C. Dinosaur origins: evidence from the footprint record. Hist. Biol. 19, 83–91 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kent, D. V., SantiMalnis, P., Colombi, C. E., Alcober, O. A. & Martínez, R. N. Age constraints on the dispersal of dinosaurs in the Late Triassic from magnetochronology of the Los Colorados Formation (Argentina). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7958–7963 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    López-Gómez, J. et al. Tethys continental-marine responses to the Carnian Humid Episode: palaeoclimatic and palaeogeographic implications. Glob. Planet. Change 148, 79–95 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Stanley, G. D. The evolution of modern corals and their early history. Earth Sci. Rev. 60, 195–225 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Preto, N., Willems, H., Guaiumi, C. & Westphal, H. Onset of significant pelagic carbonate accumulation after the Carnian Pluvial Event (CPE) in the westernTethys. Facies 59, 891–914 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Taylor, T. N., Taylor, E. L. & Krings, M. Paleobotany. The biology and evolution of fossil plants 2nd edn (Academic Press, New York, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ottone, E. G., Mancuso, A. C. & Resano, M. Miospores and Chlorococcales from the Los Rastros Formation, Middle Triassic of central-western Argentina. Ameghiniana 42, 347–362 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Mancuso, A. C. & Caselli, A. T. Paleolimnology evolution in rift basins: the Ischigualasto–Villa Unión Basin (Central-Western Argentina) during the Triassic. Sediment. Geol. 275–276, 38–54 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Ezcurra, M. D. Comments on the taxonomic diversity and paleobiogeography of the earliest known dinosaur assemblages (late Carnian–earliest Norian). Hist. Nat. 2, 49–71 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    King, M. J. & Benton, M. J. Dinosaurs in the Early and Mid Triassic? The footprint evidence from Britain. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 122, 213–225 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Thulborn, R. A. Dinosaur Tracks (Chapman and Hall, London, 1990).

  91. 91.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Cycle-calibrated Magnetostratigraphy of middle Carnian from South China: implications for Late Triassic time scale and termination of the Yangtze Platform. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 436, 135–166 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Wotzlaw, J. F., Brack, P. & Storck, J. C. High-resolution stratigraphy and zircon U–Pb geochronology of the Middle Triassic Buchenstein Formation (Dolomites, northern Italy): precession-forcing of hemipelagic carbonate sedimentation and calibration of the Anisian–Ladinian boundary interval. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 175, 71–85 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Mietto, P. et al. The Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) of the Carnian Stage (Late Triassic) at Prati di Stuores/Stuores Wiesen section (Southern Alps, NE Italy). Episodes 35, 414–430 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Matthias Franz, (Göttingen University) Edgar Nitsch (LGRB Freiburg) and Manfred Menning (GFZ Postdam) are thanked for useful information of the Germanic Basin; Nereo Preto, Manuel Rigo (Padova University) and Jacopo Dal Corso (Leeds University) are thanked for fruitful discussions on the CPE; and Guido Roghi (CNR-IRPI) for useful comments on pollen association. Hendrik Klein (SPM Neumarkt) and Marco Avanzini (MUSE Trento) provided useful comments on the tetrapod ichno-associations. P.G. thanks Marcello Caggiati (Ferrara University) for the palaeogeographic map of the upper Carnian. M.B. thanks La Sportiva for supporting field activities in the Dolomites. Funded in part by the NERC BETR grant NE/P013724/1 to M.J.B. and by PRIN 2010-2011 (Pr. No 20107ESMX9_004) to P.G.

Author information




M.B. and P.G. designed the study. M.B., F.M.P., and M.J.B. developed the palaeontological parts of the study, while P.G. and P.M. contributed in the more geological sections. All authors interpreted the results. M.B. and P.G. led the writing of the paper and all other co-authors contributed to the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Bernardi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernardi, M., Gianolla, P., Petti, F.M. et al. Dinosaur diversification linked with the Carnian Pluvial Episode. Nat Commun 9, 1499 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing