Ions dissolved in aqueous media play a fundamental role in plants, animals, and humans. Therefore, the in situ quantification of the ion concentration in aqueous media is gathering relevant interest in several fields including biomedical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, healthcare products, water and food test and control, agriculture industry and security. The fundamental limitation of the state-of-art transistor-based approaches is the intrinsic trade-off between sensitivity, ion concentration range and operating voltage. Here we show a current-driven configuration based on organic electrochemical transistors that overcomes this fundamental limit. The measured ion sensitivity exceeds by one order of magnitude the Nernst limit at an operating voltage of few hundred millivolts. The ion sensitivity normalized to the supply voltage is larger than 1200 mV V−1 dec−1, which is the largest value ever reported for ion-sensitive transistors. The proposed approach is general and can be extended to any transistor technology, thus opening opportunities for high-performance bioelectronics.
Ions dissolved in aqueous media play a fundamental role in plants, animals, and humans. Ions regulate the biological processes at the single cell scale, enable the propagation of electronic signals and maintain a suitable balance between the fluids of the extracellular and intracellular environments, which is extremely important for several processes including nerve impulses, hydration, muscle function, and the regulation of pH level1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The in situ quantification of the ion concentration in aqueous media is thus gaining significant interest in several emerging fields including biomedical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, healthcare products, water and food test and control, agriculture industry and security8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17.
Ion-sensitive field-effect transistors (ISFETs) are one of the most studied sensor-platforms for ion detection. In ISFETs the electrolyte solution is in contact with the insulator and the reference electrode acts as the gate8,18,19,20. The first ISFETs were fabricated using single-crystal silicon technology while, more recently, emerging technologies based on graphene, zinc oxide, silicon-nanowires, amorphous-oxides, and organics have been investigated18,19,21,22,23,24,25. Among them, organic technologies have triggered a great deal of interest because they are compatible with flexible large-area substrates, require simple processing, as for example spin coating or printing, allow simple functionalization through synthetic chemical modification, and the materials can be biocompatible, which is an essential prerequisite for in-vivo applications.
A fundamental challenge in applying organic transistors as ion sensors in aqueous solution is the stability, inherently due to the electrolysis. In order to avoid Faradaic leakage currents due to electrolysis, the maximum operating voltage has to be well below 1 V17,26. Low-voltage operation can be achieved by removing the insulating layer between the electrolyte and the organic semiconductor (OSC). Depending on the permeability of the OSC to the ions, two different classes of organic transistors can be obtained17. Ion-impermeable OSCs yield electrolyte-gated organic FETs (EGOFETs). In EGOFETs ions are compensated by charges (electrons or holes) accumulated into the OSC at the electrolyte-OSC interface, and an electric double-layer (EDL) is formed. The EDL capacitance is of the order of micro-Farads, ensuring a water-stable operation window17,18,21,27. On the other hand, ion-permeable OSCs yield organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs). In OECTs ions can drift into the OSC and compensate the induced charge carriers28,29,30. The electrochemical doping and de-doping processes modulate the conductivity of the OSC and are reversible28,29,30. Compared to EGOFETs, in OECTs the corresponding transconductance gm = ΔID/ΔVG is extremely large because the interaction between ions and electronic charges takes place through the bulk of the OSC and not only at the electrolyte-OSC interface. Micro-scale OECTs show gm > 10−3 S at very low gate bias, making them ideal ion-to-electron transducers28,30,31,32.
State of art OECTs show a current ion sensitivity of the order of tens μA dec−1 33,34, that is one order of magnitude larger than that obtained with EGOFETs. The current variation is then converted into a voltage variation that, in turn, is related to the ion concentration by means of the Nernst equation18,34,35. When the current variation is converted into a voltage variation both OECTs and EGOFETs show comparable voltage ion sensitivity of the order of the Nernst limit, viz. 59 mV dec−1 at room temperature34,35. To improve the voltage ion sensitivity a possible approach is to increase the ratio between the electrolyte-OSC (Cd) and gate-electrolyte (Cg) capacitances (Cd /Cg) by reducing Cg33. Another approach relies on the use of a load resistor (RL) to directly convert the drain current into an output voltage resulting in an amplification A = gmRL26. Although in principle large gm and RL result in a large sensitivity, the output voltage should be compatible with the aqueous environment in the whole range of physiological ion concentration. The fundamental limitation of the aforementioned approaches is thus the stringent trade-off between the sensitivity, the operating range and the operating voltage.
Here we show low-voltage high-sensitivity ion detection with organic electrochemical transistors used in a current-driven inverter-like configuration. In the proposed approach the bias current sets the operating range of ion concentration and the sensitivity is not limited by the supply voltage, thus overcoming the fundamental limitation of state-of-art approaches. The measured voltage ion sensitivity exceeds by about one order of magnitude the Nernst limit in the case of supply voltage of 0.4 V, while it shows a five-fold increase in the case of supply voltage of 0.2 V in the ion concentration range 10−4–100 M. The ion sensitivity normalized with respect to the supply voltage is larger than 1200 mV V−1 dec−1, which is more than one order of magnitude larger than the largest value ever reported for ion-sensitive transistors including ISFETs, EGOFETs, and OECTs. As relevant application example, a low-voltage ion-selective current-driven OECT with a voltage-normalized sensitivity as high as 1035 mV V−1 dec−1 is eventually demonstrated.
Device structure and measurements
The device structure of the OECTs is shown in Fig. 1a. Gold source and drain contacts are evaporated through shadow mask on a glass substrate, and define the transistor length L and width W. As ion-permeable conducting polymer we deposited by spin coating Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The doping of PSS in PEDOT increases the conductivity of the polymer and enables the solubility of the PEDOT in water. Thus, PEDOT:PSS shows mixed electronic and ionic conductivity: PEDOT is the electronic semiconductor degenerately doped (p-type) by the ion-conducting electrical insulator PSS. The deposited PEDOT:PSS films have thicknesses (t) ranging from 25 to 100 nm. A 1.8 μm thick photoresist, deposited by spin coating and patterned photolithographically, insulates the gold electrodes from the electrolyte solution. As electrolyte, we used an aqueous solution of NaCl or KCl since sodium, potassium, and chloride are very relevant for biological processes. For example, they preserve suitable pressure and balance of various body fluids inside and between cells, as well as blood. Moreover, they are essential for maintaining suitable acidity into the body, passively balancing out the ions of tissue, blood, and organs1,2,4,36,37. A tungsten foil or Ag/AgCl pellet is immersed into the electrolyte and used as gate electrode. The former is a polarizable electrode, viz. it forms an EDL with the electrolyte, while the latter is a non-polarizable quasi-reference electrode. Further details on the transistors fabrication are provided in the Methods section. The transfer and output characteristics of a typical OECT are shown in Fig. 1b, c. The measurements show that the OECT operates in the water-stable operation window (|VG| < 1 V), the minimum current is about 10−6 A and the on/off current ratio is larger than 103. The linear and saturation operating regions are clearly displayed in the output characteristics of Fig. 1c. Figure 1d shows the measured transconductance gm = dID/dVG as a function of VG. The maximum gm is about 3 mS at VG = −0.1 V and VD = −0.4 V, which agrees with state-of-art OECTs28,29,30. Figure 1e shows the measured output resistance ro = (dID/dVD)−1 as a function of VD. The maximum ro is about 70 kΩ at VD = −0.7 V and VG = 0.2 V and it reduces to about 10 kΩ at VG = −0.2 V.
Current-driven OECT configuration
The proposed current-driven OECT configuration is shown in Fig. 2a. The OECT is connected in series with a current generator resembling an inverter topology, as schematically depicted in Fig. 2b. The input voltage (VI) is applied to the gate (VG = VI) while the output voltage (VO) is measured at the drain (VD = VO). The bias current IB is set by the current generator and the topology gives ID = IB. A typical transfer characteristic (VO – VI) with IB = 1.25 mA is displayed in Fig. 2c. When the current-driven OECT is biased at negative VI (e.g., VI = −VDD), anions are injected into the PEDOT:PSS, the polymer is doped, and the OECT operates in linear region. The OECT output resistance ro is small (Fig. 1e) and VO = VDD–IB ro ≈ VDD. By increasing VI anions are progressively extracted from the polymer and cations injected. Therefore, the polymer is de-doped, ro increases, VO lowers, and the OECT is eventually operated in saturation region. In the transfer characteristics VO–VI the transition between the linear and the saturation region takes place when VI−VO = VP, where VP is the pinch-off voltage. As an example, in Fig. 2c the OECT saturation condition is achieved at VI = + 0.22 V where VO = −0.05 V and hence VI−VO = + 0.27 V which, as readily visible in Fig. 1b, is equal to the pinch-off voltage VP = + 0.27 V. In saturation, the transistor is pinched-off at the drain (output contact), ID is almost independent of VD, ro increases by more than one order of magnitude (Fig. 1e), and, as a consequence, VO sharply drops to the minimum supply voltage –VDD. This is analogous to the zero-VGS inverter topology38. Here the OECT is the driver and the current generator is the zero-VGS load. When VI is low the OECT operates in linear region and pulls VO towards VDD. By increasing VI the OECT becomes less conductive, VO lowers and, in the case of Fig. 2c, at VI ≥ 0.22 V the OECT is eventually operated in saturation, where ro is large and VO drops to –VDD. It is worth noting that the minimum supply voltage (–VDD) is set by means of the voltage-compliance of the current generator.
We define the switching voltage VSW as the minimum VI required to operate the OECT in saturation. The switching voltage provides meaningful information on the OECT parameters and can be analytically calculated as follows. The OECT current in the saturation regime reads29,39:
where β = W μ Cv t (2 L)−1, μ is the charge carrier mobility, Cv is the volumetric capacitance, VS is the source voltage, VP = q p0 Cv−1 is the pinch-off voltage, q is the elementary charge, and p0 is the initial charge carrier density in the conductive polymer before the application of the gate voltage. When the OECT is connected in the current-driven configuration VS = VDD, ID = IB, VG = VI. Since the OECT starts to operate in saturation when VI = VSW, the switching voltage can be analytically calculated by substituting VG = VSW in Eq. (1) and results:
Eq. (2) shows that VSW depends on the main parameters of the current-driven configuration, i.e. the OECT physical and geometrical parameters (VP, β), the supply voltage VDD and the bias current IB. Figure 2d shows the transfer characteristics VO–VI of the current-driven OECT for several current biases IB. According with Eq. (2), by increasing IB the switching voltage shifts to lower VI. This is because VO gets lower at larger IB and thus the OECT saturation occurs at a lower input voltage (i.e., VSW reduces). Furthermore, Eq. (2) shows that VSW also depends on the OECT parameters (viz. VP and β) that, in turn, are related to the transistor geometry (namely W, L, t) and to the physical parameters of the conductive polymer and the electrolyte solution (namely μ, Cv, and p0).
Impact of the ion concentration
In order to investigate the impact of the ion concentration on the electrical characteristics of the current-driven OECT, Fig. 3a–d show the measured VO−VI as a function of the ion concentration. More in detail, Fig. 3a shows the VO–VI characteristics of a current-driven OECT operated with a current bias IB = 0.4 mA. When the ion concentration is c = 100 M, the switching voltage is close to 0 V. By decreasing the ion concentration, VSW shifts towards positive voltage. We found VSW = 0.17 V and VSW = 0.38 V with c = 5 10−1 M and c = 2 10−1 M, respectively. By further decreasing c, the switching voltage exceeds the supply voltage (VDD = 0.4 V), and cannot be detected anymore since we sweep VI in the range |VI| ≤ |VDD|. As shown in Eq. (2), by increasing the current bias IB it is possible to shift VSW back within the supply voltage range. This is confirmed in Fig. 3b which shows that the VO – VI characteristic obtained at c = 2 10−1 M is restored to VSW ≈ 0.1 V. Consequently, the ion concentration can be decreased to c = 10−1 M resulting in a shift of the switching voltage to VSW = 0.27 V. When c is further decreased to c = 5 10−2 M, VSW cannot be detected anymore (Fig. 3b, dashed green line), and has to be restored within the supply voltage range by increasing IB. Similar considerations hold for the cases IB = 1 mA (Fig. 3c) and IB = 1.8 mA (Fig. 3d). It is worth to note that the current bias drives the OECT operation and sets VSW within a given range of ion concentration, while the variation of the switching voltage is inherently related to the variation of the ion concentration. In other words, the ion concentration range is set by selecting IB while VSW is related to the value of c.
Investigation of the ion sensitivity
In order to quantitatively assess the ion sensitivity of the proposed current-driven OECTs, we calculate the cumulative shift of the switching voltage, defined as ΔVSWi+1 = ΔVSWi + (VSWi+1−VSWi), where i is the i-th ion concentration. Figure 3e shows ΔVSW as a function of the ion concentration. The least-square linear approximation of the measured ΔVSW (red dashed line) gives an average sensitivity of 516 mV dec−1 at a supply voltage of 0.4 V, that is about one order of magnitude larger than the theoretical Nernstian sensitivity of 59.16 mV dec−1. It is worth to note that the measured ion sensitivity of the current-driven OECT is almost constant in the whole range of ion concentration (Fig. 3e). For a given IB, a certain range of ion concentrations can be assessed, ensuring at the same time that the measured VSW lies within the supply voltage. This condition can be achieved for any ion concentration and thus the sensitivity is not limited by the supply voltage. The possibility of selecting the ion concentration range by means of IB enables to operate the current-driven OECT at extremely low supply voltages – fundamental to prevent Faradaic leakage currents due to water electrolysis—while maintaining at the same time a high ion concentration sensitivity (ΔVSW/Δc). From Eq. (2), the ion concentration sensitivity can be calculated as follows:
Eq. (3) shows that the ion concentration sensitivity depends on the OECT parameters sensitivity, viz. ΔVP/Δc and Δβ/Δc.
To gain more insight on the origin of the high ion sensitivity of the current-driven OECT configuration, it is crucial to estimate the OECT parameters sensitivity. Figure 4a, b show the measured transfer characteristics and transconductances as a function of the ion concentration, ranging from 10−2 to 100 M, at VD = −0.4 V. The measured transfer characteristics shift toward negative voltages and the transconductances get lower by increasing the ion concentration. By reproducing the measurements with the model proposed by Bernards and Malliaras (Eq. 1)29,39, we estimated the OECT parameters VP and β at several ion concentrations. Figure 4c–d show that both VP and β linearly depend on the logarithm of the ion concentration and we found ΔVP/Δc = −135 mV dec−1 and Δβ/Δc = − 0.9 mS V−1 dec−1. It is worth noting that ΔVP/Δc agrees with state-of-art OECTs operated with polarizable gate electrode (e.g., tungsten).
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach at lower voltage, we investigated current-driven OECTs operated at a supply voltage as low as VDD = 0.2 V. We note that this operating voltage is significantly lower than that typically used for OECTs28,30,33, OECT-based ion sensors34 and voltage amplifiers26. To optimize the operation at low voltages, we replaced the tungsten gate with a Ag/AgCl gate electrode. This minimizes the voltage drop at the gate electrode/electrolyte interface at the expense of a slightly reduction of ΔVP/Δc. Moreover, the OECT geometries have been optimized to warrant the detection of one order of magnitude of concentration for a given current bias IB.
Figure 5a–d show the measured VO−VI of the ultra-low voltage current-driven OECT as a function of the ion concentration. More in detail, Fig. 5a shows the VO–VI characteristics of a current-driven OECT operated with a current bias IB = 0.2 mA. When the ion concentration is c = 100 M, the switching voltage is close to 0 V. By decreasing the ion concentration, VSW shifts towards positive voltages. We found VSW = 0.15 V with c = 10−1 M. Further decreasing c, the switching voltage exceeds the supply voltage (VDD = 0.2 V), and cannot be detected anymore. By increasing the current bias IB it is possible to shift VSW back within the supply voltage range. Figure 5b shows the VO–VI characteristics of a current-driven OECT operated with a current bias IB = 0.3 mA. When the ion concentration is c = 10−1 M, the switching voltage is restored to VSW ≈ 0 V. Consequently, the ion concentration can be decreased to c = 10−2 M resulting in a shift of the switching voltage to VSW = 0.17 V. Similar considerations hold for the cases IB = 0.5 mA (Fig. 5c) and IB = 0.8 mA (Fig. 5d).
To quantitatively assess the ion sensitivity of the ultra-low voltage current-driven OECTs, Fig. 5e shows ΔVSW as a function of the ion concentration in the range 10−4–100 M. The linear least-square approximation of the measured ΔVSW (red dashed line) gives an average sensitivity of 243 mV dec−1 in the ion concentration range 10−4–10−2 M and of 144 mV dec−1 in the range 10−2 to 100 M, at a supply voltage as low as 0.2 V.
As a relevant application example, high-sensitivity ion-selective detection is demonstrated by endowing the current-driven OECT with an ion-selective membrane. According with previous works34,35 an ion-selective membrane is fabricated and used to separate an inner electrolyte in direct contact with the OECT from the analyte. The inner and the analyte electrolytes are confined in two wells, one stacked on the top of the other, and separated by the ion-selective membrane. Further details are provided in the Methods section. To directly compare the current-driven approach with state-of-art ion-selective OECTs, an Ag/AgCl pellet is used as gate electrode, and a membrane selective to K+ ions is fabricated as described in34. A 10−2 M KCl electrolyte is used as inner filling solution while KCl or NaCl at several concentrations are used as analyte solution.
Figure 6a–d show the measured VO−VI of an ion-selective current-driven OECT as a function of the ion concentration. According with the previous analysis, VSW shifts to more positive voltages when the ion concentration is reduced and it is possible to shift VSW back within the supply voltage range by increasing the current bias IB. This ensures, at the same time, both high-sensitivity and low-voltage operation. To evaluate the ion sensitivity of ion-selective current-driven OECTs, Fig. 6e shows ΔVSW as a function of the ion concentration. The linear least-square approximation of the measured ΔVSW (red dashed line) gives an average sensitivity of 414 mV dec−1 at a supply voltage equal to 0.4 V, which is more than 8-fold larger than the ion sensitivity obtained by using an OECT34. Moreover, it is worth to note that the sensitivity obtained with the ion-selective membrane is close to the value obtained without the ion-selective membrane.
Finally, the selectivity is investigated by using NaCl as analyte solution. Supplementary Figs. 1a, b show the measured VO−VI as a function of the ion concentration and at several IB. Independently of the NaCl concentration VO is almost constant in the supply voltage range and no switching occurs. This confirms that the membrane is selective to K+ ions, and the current-driven OECT configuration can be successfully used for high sensitivity and selective ion detection.
The current-driven OECT configuration provides, at the same time, low-voltage operation and high sensitivity. The sensitivity, ΔVSW/Δc, depends on the sum of two contributions (Eq. 3), i.e., ΔVSW/Δc = ΔVP/Δc + ΔVβ /Δc, where ΔVβ /Δc = k x Δβ/Δc and k = (IB/β3)1/2/2. Since in the current-driven OECT configuration both VP and β decrease by increasing the ion concentration, the terms ΔVβ/Δc and ΔVP/Δc sum up resulting in an improved voltage ion sensitivity with respect to that obtained with conventional OECT operation, where the voltage sensitivity is limited to only ΔVP/Δc33.
The current-driven OECTs overcome these fundamental limitations by adding a very relevant contribution to the voltage ion sensitivity, i.e. ΔVβ /Δc = k × Δβ/Δc, that can be enhanced by means of the OECT design parameters, viz. channel width and length, semiconductor thickness, mobility, and volumetric capacitance. For example, the results presented in Figs. 3 and 4 show that current-driven OECTs operated at IB = 0.8 mA and at c = 2 10−1 M gives k ≈ 400 and therefore ΔVβ /Δc ≈ 360 mV dec−1, which yield ΔVβ /Δc ≈ 3 × ΔVP/Δc.
Interestingly, ultra-low voltage current-driven OECTs show a voltage ion sensitivity ΔVSW/Δc = ΔVP/Δc + ΔVβ /Δc larger at smaller concentrations (Fig. 5e). This can be explained as follows. Supplementary Fig. 2c shows that VP linearly depends on the logarithm of the ion concentration while Supplementary Fig. 2d shows that β has a double linear dependence on the logarithm of the ion concentration. We found that ΔVP/Δc = −98 mV dec−1 in the whole concentration range, while Δβ/Δc = −0.28 mS V−1 dec−1 in the concentration range 10−4–10−2 M and Δβ/Δc = −0.10 mS V−1 dec−1 in the range 10−2–100 M. Consequently, ΔVβ/Δc = k × Δβ/Δc is larger in the concentration range 10−4–10−2 M, and this explains the larger ion sensitivity at smaller concentrations. The variation of β as a function of the ion concentration c could be related to a variation of CV and/or μ. To investigate this point, we extracted CV and μ as a function of the ion concentration. Taking advantage of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements (Supplementary Fig. 3) we found that CV is independent of c and results CV = 39.38 ± 1.76 F cm−3, in good agreement with state-of-art PEDOT-PSS OECTs28,29,30. Then, we extracted μ as a function of c from the measured ID-VG (Supplementary Fig. 4). We found that μ decreases by increasing c, thus explaining the β–c characteristic displayed in the Supplementary Fig. 2d.
The proposed approach is compared with several ion-sensitive transistor technologies in Table 1. The voltage ion sensitivity of the current-driven OECT configuration outperforms silicon, metal-oxide and electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors. It is only surpassed by ZnO double gate transistors18,21,40, which require a more complex multi-layer fabrication and a quite large supply voltage (up to 20 V) inherently related to the small gate capacitance. In order to fairly compare the different transistor technologies, the voltage ion sensitivity is normalized with respect to the supply voltage. As shown in Table 1, the normalized voltage ion sensitivity AvI = (ΔVSW/Δc)/VDD obtained with current-driven OECTs at VDD = 0.2 V and VDD = 0.4 V results AvI = 1215 mV V−1 dec−1 and AvI = 1290 mV V−1 dec−1, respectively. These values are more than one order of magnitude larger than those reported for state-of-art ion-sensitive transistors including Si ISFETs, ZnO single and double gate FETs, a-IGZO double gate FETs, Si nanowire FETs, graphene FETs, EGOFETs, and OECTs.
The current-driven OECT approach ensures, at the same time, low-voltage operation and high sensitivity in a wide range of ion concentrations. In contrast to state-of-art ion sensors where the input ion concentration is converted in an output voltage26, the current-driven OECT configuration is based on the reading of the switching voltage, which is positioned inside the supply voltage range by properly selecting the bias current. Therefore, the current-driven OECT approach exploits the large transconductance of OECTs in a completely different fashion with respect to standard voltage amplifier configurations26 and breaks the intrinsic trade-off between sensitivity and operating voltage.
In summary, the current-driven OECT approach shows that is possible to dramatically enhance the ion sensitivity of OECTs while maintaining a low-voltage operation. The key ingredients are the large transistor transconductance that reflects in the large amplification and the bias current that enables to select the operating range and ensures the low-voltage operation.
The measured voltage ion sensitivity exceeds by about one order of magnitude the Nernst limit in the case of supply voltage of 0.4 V, while it shows a five-fold increase in the case of supply voltage of 0.2 V. The ion sensitivity normalized with respect to the supply voltage is larger than 1200 mV V−1 dec−1, which is the largest value ever reported for ion-sensitive transistors.
The proposed approach is general and could be extended to other electrochemical and field-effect transistor technologies. In addition, current-driven OECTs allow simple and low-cost fabrication on flexible substrates, opening new opportunities for high-performance conformable and widespread organic bioelectronics.
Glass slides were cleaned by sonication in acetone, isopropyl alcohol, and deionized water, followed by drying and UV ozone cleaning. 100 nm thick gold source/drain contacts were evaporated through a shadow mask defining the device channel length. An adhesion layer of 5 nm of chromium has been previously deposited. For the preparation of the organic semiconductor films, 20 ml of aqueous dispersion of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrene sulfonic acid) PEDOT:PSS (PH-500 from Heraeus Clevios GmbH) and 1 ml of Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were mixed and sonicated before spin coating41. The films were subsequently baked at 140 °C for 1 h and immersed in deionized water to remove any excess low-molecular-weight compounds. A 1.8 μm AZ1518 positive photoresist purchased form Microchemicals GmbH and used as received, was spin coated and photolithographically patterned on top of electrodes in order to avoid unwanted electrochemical reaction of the gold electrodes.
The PVC-based membrane was prepared by mixing high molecular weight PVC (36.5 wt.%) with potassium ionophore III (2.5 wt.%), potassium tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl-)borate (0.5 wt.%) and diisodecyl adipate (60.5 wt.%) in THF (500 mg/5 mL). The mixture was drop-casted onto a glass slide and dried at room temperature. A rubber ring defined the dimension of the membrane and provided the necessary stability for further transfer34. ISM-OECT: A small PDMS-well, containing the inner solution (10−2 M KCl), was used as a mechanical support for the K+-selective membrane. On top of the ion-selective membrane, it is placed a small chamber (transwell filter, pore size 0.4 μm) with the analyte solution at various concentrations. A quasi-reference Ag/AgCl electrode was immersed into the analyte solution and used as gate electrode (1 mm pellet, Warner Instruments).
All characterization was performed using a solution of NaCl or KCl in DI water as the electrolyte at several different concentrations and a tungsten foil or an Ag/AgCl pellet (Warner Instruments) as the gate electrode. The DC electrical characteristics of the OECTs were measured with a Keithley 4200 SCS parameter analyser. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a function of the ion concentration are performed in the three-electrode configuration, where two Ag/AgCl pellets serve as reference and counter electrodes. The source and drain electrodes are shorted together, and the OECT channel is used as the working electrode. We used the National Instruments PXI-1042 system, equipped with a PXI-5421 arbitrary wave-function generator, a PXI-5112 oscilloscope and custom Labview software for the control of the PXI system.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. Biology 8th edn. Biology (Pearson Benjamin Cummings, New York, 2008).
Quinton, P. M. Chloride impermeability in cystic fibrosis. Nature 301, 421–422 (1983).
Sulzer, N. U., Schwellnus, M. P. & Noakes, T. D. Serum electrolytes in ironman triathletes with exercise-associated muscle cramping. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37, 1081–1085 (2005).
Tayo, B. O. et al. Patterns of sodium and potassium excretion and blood pressure in the African Diaspora. J. Hum. Hypertens. 26, 315–324 (2012).
Marzouk, S. A. M., Buck, R. P., Dunlap, L. A., Johnson, T. A. & Cascio, W. E. Measurement of extracellular pH, K+, and lactate in ischemic heart. Anal. Biochem. 308, 52–60 (2002).
Naumova, E. A. et al. Dynamic changes in saliva after acute mental stress. Sci. Rep. 4, 4884 (2015).
Gholizadeh, A. et al. Toward point-of-care management of chronic respiratory conditions: Electrochemical sensing of nitrite content in exhaled breath condensate using reduced graphene oxide. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 3, 17022 (2017).
Bratov, A., Abramova, N. & Ipatov, A. Recent trends in potentiometric sensor arrays-A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 678, 149–159 (2010).
Rivnay, J., Owens, R. M. & Malliaras, G. G. The rise of organic bioelectronics. Chem. Mater. 26, 679–685 (2014).
Someya, T., Bao, Z. & Malliaras, G. G. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature 540, 379–385 (2016).
Yew, Y. T., Ambrosi, A. & Pumera, M. Nitroaromatic explosives detection using electrochemically exfoliated graphene. Sci. Rep. 6, 33276 (2016).
Yuen, J. D., Walper, S. A., Melde, B. J., Daniele, M. A. & Stenger, D. A. Electrolyte-sensing transistor decals enabled by ultrathin microbial nanocellulose. Sci. Rep. 7, 40867 (2017).
Gao, W. et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 529, 509–514 (2016).
Knopfmacher, O. et al. Highly stable organic polymer field-effect transistor sensor for selective detection in the marine environment. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–9 (2014).
Imani, S. et al. A wearable chemical–electrophysiological hybrid biosensing system for real-time health and fitness monitoring. Nat. Commun. 7, 11650 (2016).
Simon, D. T., Gabrielsson, E. O., Tybrandt, K. & Berggren, M. Organic bioelectronics: bridging the signaling gap between biology and technology. Chem. Rev. 116, 13009–13041 (2016).
Kim, S. H. et al. Electrolyte-gated transistors for organic and printed electronics. Adv. Mater. 25, 1822–1846 (2013).
Spijkman, M. et al. Beyond the Nernst-limit with dual-gate ZnO ion-sensitive field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 43502 (2011).
Knopfmacher, O. et al. Nernst limit in dual-gated Si-nanowire FET sensors. Nano Lett. 10, 2268–2274 (2010).
Ji, T., Rai, P., Jung, S. & Varadan, V. K. In vitro evaluation of flexible pH and potassium ion-sensitive organic field effect transistor sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 1–4 (2008).
Spijkman, M. J. et al. Dual-gate organic field-effect transistors as potentiometrie sensors in aqueous solution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 898–905 (2010).
Fu, W. et al. High mobility graphene ion-sensitive field-effect transistors by noncovalent functionalization. Nanoscale 5, 12104 (2013).
Yano, M. et al. Zinc oxide ion-sensitive field-effect transistors and biosensors. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 211, 2098–2104 (2014).
Stern, E. et al. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. Nature 445, 519–522 (2007).
Kumar, N., Kumar, J. & Panda, S. Back-channel electrolyte-gated a-IGZO dual-gate thin-film transistor for enhancement of pH sensitivity over nernst limit. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 37, 500–503 (2016).
Braendlein, M., Lonjaret, T., Leleux, P., Badier, J. M. & Malliaras, G. G. Voltage amplifier based on organic electrochemical transistor. Adv. Sci. 4, 1600247 (2017).
Buth, F., Kumar, D., Stutzmann, M. & Garrido, J. A. Electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistors for sensing applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 153302 (2011).
Rivnay, J. et al. Organic electrochemical transistors with maximum transconductance at zero gate bias. Adv. Mater. 25, 7010–7014 (2013).
Rivnay, J. et al. High-performance transistors for bioelectronics through tuning of channel thickness. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400251 (2015).
Khodagholy, D. et al. High transconductance organic electrochemical transistors. Nat. Commun. 4, 3538–3544 (2013).
Leleux, P. et al. Organic electrochemical transistors for clinical applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 142–147 (2015).
Tybrandt, K., Forchheimer, R. & Berggren, M. Logic gates based on ion transistors. Nat. Commun. 3, 871 (2012).
Lin, P., Yan, F. & Chan, H. L. W. Ion-sensitive properties of organic electrochemical transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2, (1637–1641 (2010).
Sessolo, M., Rivnay, J., Bandiello, E., Malliaras, G. G. & Bolink, H. J. Ion-selective organic electrochemical transistors. Adv. Mater. 26, 4803–4807 (2014).
Schmoltner, K., Kofler, J., Klug, A. & List-Kratochvil, E. J. W. Electrolyte-gated organic field-effect transistor for selective reversible ion detection. Adv. Mater. 25, 6895–6899 (2013).
Guggino, W. B. & Stanton, B. A. New insights into cystic fibrosis: molecular switches that regulate CFTR. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 426–436 (2006).
Park, S. et al. Elevated baseline potassium level within reference range is associated with worse clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients. Sci. Rep. 7, 2402 (2017).
Cantatore, E. et al. A 13.56-MHz RFID system based on organic transponders. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 42, 84–92 (2007).
Bernards, D. A. & Malliaras, G. G. Steady-state and transient behavior of organic electrochemical transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 3538–3544 (2007).
Spijkman, M. J. et al. Dual-gate thin-film transistors, integrated circuits and sensors. Adv. Mater. 23, 3231–3242 (2011).
Macchia, E., Ghittorelli, M., Torricelli, F. & Torsi, L. Organic electrochemical transistor immuno-sensor operating at the femto-molar limit of detection. in 2017 7th IEEE International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI) 68–72 (IEEE, Vieste, Italy, 2017).
F.T. acknowledges funding from the Fondazione Cariplo e Regione Lombardia, project ‘New Opportunities and ways towards ERC’ (NOW-ERC), no. 2014–2256.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Ghittorelli, M., Lingstedt, L., Romele, P. et al. High-sensitivity ion detection at low voltages with current-driven organic electrochemical transistors. Nat Commun 9, 1441 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03932-3
Water stable molecular n-doping produces organic electrochemical transistors with high transconductance and record stability
Nature Communications (2020)
Multiscale real time and high sensitivity ion detection with complementary organic electrochemical transistors amplifier
Nature Communications (2020)
Microchimica Acta (2020)
Ion buffering and interface charge enable high performance electronics with organic electrochemical transistors
Nature Communications (2019)
A novel porous silicon multi-ions selective electrode based extended gate field effect transistor for sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium sensor
Applied Physics A (2019)