RING tetramerization is required for nuclear body biogenesis and PML sumoylation

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 04 May 2018

This article has been updated


ProMyelocyticLeukemia nuclear bodies (PML NBs) are stress-regulated domains directly implicated in acute promyelocytic leukemia eradication. Most TRIM family members bind ubiquitin E2s and many acquire ligase activity upon RING dimerization. In contrast, PML binds UBC9, the SUMO E2 enzyme. Here, using X-ray crystallography and SAXS characterization, we demonstrate that PML RING tetramerizes through highly conserved PML-specific sequences, which are required for NB assembly and PML sumoylation. Conserved residues implicated in RING dimerization of other TRIMs also contribute to PML tetramer stability. Wild-type PML rescues the ability of some RING mutants to form NBs as well as their sumoylation. Impaired RING tetramerization abolishes PML/RARA-driven leukemogenesis in vivo and arsenic-induced differentiation ex vivo. Our studies thus identify RING tetramerization as a key step in the NB macro-molecular scaffolding. They suggest that higher order RING interactions allow efficient UBC9 recruitment and thus change the biochemical nature of TRIM-facilitated post-translational modifications.


PML nuclear bodies (NBs) are membrane-less insoluble structures whose assembly increases upon stress and which recruit a large number of partner proteins1. PML NBs also recruit enzymes implicated in several post-translational modifications, primarily UBC9, the key E2 SUMO-conjugating enzyme, possibly facilitating partner sumoylation2,3. There is evidence that PML NBs regulate stress responses, in particular senescence induction, at least in part through the control of p53 activation4,5,6. Indeed, NBs are directly implicated in the eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) by retinoic acid and arsenic therapy, notably by inducing p53-mediated senescence7,8,9. PML belongs to the TRIM family of proteins, defined by the presence of a RING domain, one or two other zinc fingers (B boxes) and a long coiled coil10. Many TRIMs are ubiquitin E3 ligases, through their ability to bridge RING-binding E2 enzymes to specific substrates11. Furthermore, TRIM RING dimerization is often required for E2 interaction12,13,14. Interestingly, PML RING interacts with UBC915. Similar to PML, several TRIM family members are interferon-induced, regulate innate immunity and/or assemble into large nuclear or cytoplasmic complexes12,14. PML RING, B boxes and coiled coil are all important for NB-biogenesis16,17,18. Although PML sumoylation was proposed to drive PML NB-biogenesis19,20, SUMO is required for NB client protein recruitment rather than PML self-assembly into NBs2,21,22,23.

Here we report the crystallographic high-resolution structure of PML RING, and demonstrate that it assembles into a tetrameric torus. Interfaces of these tetramers involve PML-specific sequences that are highly conserved during evolution. Critically, their mutation prevents PML tetramerization in solution and abolishes NB formation and PML sumoylation in cellulo. Our data suggest that this novel macro-molecular RING assembly may control interactions with E2s and hence TRIM functions.


RING crystal structure reveals a torus-shaped tetramer

We have determined the crystal structure of PML RING at a 1.6 Å resolution by single wavelength anomalous dispersion (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Figure 1a–e). Similar to previous RING structures16,24, the folding of PML RING49–104 is coordinated by two Zn ions, but in contrast with previous studies, PML RING leads tetrameric complexes. Within a tetramer, each PML subunit adopts a balloon shape configuration with two distinct sub-domains. Sub-domain 1 (SD1FQF) is a loop containing only three residues, F52Q53F54, while sub-domain 2 (SD2), comprising residues 55–99, is a classic C3HC4 RING finger (Fig. 1a,b). Together with homo-dimerization of SD2, interactions between SD1FQF and SD2 create a four subunits torus-like structure (Fig. 1). Importantly, the residues involved in both interfaces are not only highly conserved among PML orthologs (purple boxes in Fig. 1b), but also highly specific to PML within the TRIM family. The RING tetramer harbors four highly charged patches at each side of the torus as well as a symmetrical deep groove diagonally across each face (Supplementary Figure 1a–e), which could constitute binding sites for partner proteins and/or other PML domains (see below). The interactions between SD1FQF/SD2 and SD2/SD2 interfaces of the PML RING tetramer are mediated by: (i) the interaction between F52 from SD1FQF loop of subunit 1, and the hydrophobic pocket delineated by the side chains of L70, L81, W95 from SD2 of subunit 2 (Fig. 1c); (ii) the hydrophobic interactions between F54 from SD1FQF, K65 from SD2 of the same subunit 1 and K68 from SD2 of subunit 2, so that the benzyl side chain of F54 is sandwiched by the side chains of K65 and K68 (Fig.1c); (iii) an intermolecular disulfide bridge C66-C66 in the crystal; (iv) two adjacent SD2 subunits pack against each other in a face-to-face configuration mainly mediated by the L73-L73 hand-shake-like hydrophobic interaction, but also by a highly evolutionarily conserved loop around C91 (Fig. 1a,b,d).

Fig. 1

Crystal structure of PML RING tetramer. a Crystal structure of PML RING tetramer. The residues 51–97 of crystallized PML RING49–104 are visible in the electron density map. Four PML monomers are colored in green, magenta, blue and yellow, respectively. The contact residues (F52, F54 and L73) are shown in stick representation. Zn ions are shown in sphere representation. Sub-domain 1 (SD1FQF) and sub-domain 2 (SD2) are bracketed. b Sequence alignment of the PML RING domains from different species. The conserved residues lying in the F52/54-interfaces and L73-interfaces are highlighted in red, while the conserved Zn-binding residues are colored in cyan. The deep purple boxes underneath the sequences are used to highlight the conserved (greater than 5 out of 6) residues among PML RING. c, d Enlarged views of PML RING dimeric interfaces. The residues involving PML oligomerization are shown in stick representation. e Structural superimposition between different PML RINGs. The NMR16 and crystallographic PML RINGs are colored in yellow and green, respectively. L73 positions are labeled with “Asterisk”. The internal Zn–Zn distances and the putative F52Q53F54 swing are highlighted with dash lines. f The buried areas of the SD1FQF/SD2 and SD2/SD2 interfaces are shown in gray

When the previous NMR RING structure is superimposed with the crystallographic one, significant differences appear (Fig. 1e). In the previously described monomeric structure, SD1FQF was proposed to interact with the SD2 of the same subunit. Within the current tetramer, the N-terminal F52Q53F54 SD1FQF undergoes a radical 23 Å swing away from the adjacent SD2, allowing the SD1FQF loop to engage with the hydrophobic pocket of the other subunit. This shift also exposes L73 and allows SD2 dimerization (Fig. 1e,f). As estimated by the AREAIMOL25 program, the buried surfaces between one set of SD1FQF/SD2 and SD2/SD2 dimers are 1333 and 779 Å2, respectively (Fig. 1f). As oligomerization proceeds, the buried surface of PML RING tetramer increases significantly to 4216 Å2, accounting for ~40% of the overall surface of PML RING tetramer (Fig. 1f).

Tetramerizationin solution through highly conserved sequences

Existence of PML RING tetramers is supported by biochemical analyses: analytical ultracentrifuge experiments of PML RING49–104 showed three peaks corresponding to molecular masses of 7.5, 15 and 34 kDa, consistent with RING monomer, dimer and tetramer formation (Fig. 2a). Importantly, disruption of either interfaces abolished complex formation (Fig. 2b), while not altering the RING overall fold (Supplementary Figure 2). In order to further document PML RING tetramerization in solution, we used small-angle-X-ray scattering (SAXS) (Fig. 2c). The match in crystal fitting with a Χ2 value of 1.19 suggested the existence of PML RING monomer (60.1%), dimer (26.1%) and tetramer (13.8%) in solution (Fig. 2d). We then performed gel filtration of PML deleted for B boxes and coiled coil domains (∆BC) to prevent oligomerization, with or without F52/54E or L73E, or with mutations of the SD1FQF-interacting amino acid K65, K68 and L81 in SD2 (Supplementary Figure 4a). These PML mutants were consistently found in lower molecular weight fractions compared to PML∆BC, suggesting that they lost their self-interaction properties. Similarly, when the F52/54E mutant was mixed with PML∆BC, the latter was found in lower molecular weight fractions, suggestive for impairment of its tetramerization (Supplementary Figure 4b).

Fig. 2

Characterization of PML RING tetramers. a Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis of tetramerization of wild type PML RING, at 1 and 5 mg ml−1 concentrations, respectively. b Analytical ultracentrifugation analysis of 1 mg ml−1 PML RING, PML RINGF52/54E and PML RINGL73E. c SAXS characterization. Black dots, experimental data. Red line, the theoretical scattering pattern derived from mixs of PML RING multimers. d Oligomeric distribution estimated by SAXS analysis. The distribution of PML RING monomer (60.1%), dimer (26.1%) and tetramer (13.8%) was estimated using the OLIGOMER algorithm

Tetramers are also stabilized by TRIM-conserved sequence

Other TRIM RING domains form dimers rather than tetramers, prompting a detailed analysis of the evolutionary diversity between PML- and TRIM- RING sequences (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figure 3). Among TRIM RINGs, interactions between N-terminal and C-terminal helix segments were recently implicated in TRIM5, TRIM25 or TRIM32 dimer formation26,27,28,29. While the N-terminal sequence is not found in PML RING, the highly conserved C-terminal amino acids are present in PML, with N106 and L122 being the two most conserved residues in this TRIM-specific helix (Fig. 3a). An extended PML sequence, RING1–119 was thus subjected to gel filtration and SEC-MALS analysis. Critically, we obtained evidence for stable tetrameric and dimeric assembly in solution (Fig. 3b–e). Mutations of either of N106R or L112R inhibited PML RING tetramerization (Fig. 3f). Critically, mutations of residues implicated in the tetramer interfaces (F52QF54 and L73), which do not alter the RING overall fold (Supplementary Figure 2), also precluded tetramerization of the extended RING (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Figure 4). We finally subjected the long version of PML RING to limited proteolysis and mass sequencing, revealing that residues 53–98 constitute its structured core domain (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Figure 5). Remarkably, this domain is almost identical to the one used for PML RING crystallization, suggesting that the C-terminal helix bundle may somehow be dissociated from the RING core. Collectively, these biochemical studies support the importance of the RING tetramer interfaces for higher order PML RING interactions.

Fig. 3

Biochemical evidence for RING tetramer formation. a Consensus sequence among TRIM RINGs (Top). PML conserved sequences are highlighted with purple boxes (Bottom). The conserved TRIM dimeric interface is highlighted with a red line. The Asn and Ile/Leu residues (red arrows) mediate dimeric assembly of other TRIMs. b Gel filtration analysis of recombinant PML RING1–119. Two elution peaks and a last fraction, designated as Peak 1, 2 and fraction 3, respectively. ce SEC-MALS reanalysis of Peak 1 (c), Peak 2 (d) and fraction 3 (e) derived from previous gel filtration (b). Black curve, the elution profile in UV. Orange curve, the estimated molecular weight. The theoretical molecular weight of PML RING1–119 is 13.1 kDa. Peak 1 sample displayed distinct peaks that correspond to the tetramer (54 kDa), dimer and monomer in the solution. Peak 2 and fraction 3 samples primarily exhibit RING dimer (24 kDa). f Gel filtration of WT RING1–119 and its mutants. g Recombinant PML RING1–119 was subjected to chymotrypsin digestion (Supplementary Figure 5). Arrows indicate the chymotrypsin sites and amino acids indicated in red correspond to the protected fragment, as determined by mass spectrometry and N-terminal sequencing (Box). RING49–104 sequences analyzed by X-ray crystallography are underlined with a blue line

NB assembly and PML sumoylation requires RING tetramerization

To test whether PML RING tetramerization is also important in cellulo, we explored NBs formation and PML sumoylation by stable expression of the mutants in immortalized Pml−/− fibroblasts (Fig. 4). Critically, these mutants generated significantly fewer NBs (PMLF52/54E) or even none (PMLL73E), while the diffuse nuclear staining was dramatically increased. The PMLF52/54A mutant behaved as PMLF52/54E. The effects of single F to E mutations were less drastic, but nevertheless significantly decreased the numbers of NBs (Supplementary Figure 6a). Similarly, combining mutations of the residues facing F52 and F54 on SD2 (K65/68A-L81E and K65/68A-W95E) also reduced NB formation and increased the nuclear diffuse fraction of PML (Supplementary Figure 6d). In contrast, mutations of C66, which is not evolutionarily conserved (Fig.1b), to S or A had modest or no effect on NB biogenesis or basal sumoylation (Supplementary Figure 6d,g). Critically, PMLF52/54E or PMLL73E failed to undergo efficient sumoylation (Fig. 4b). The more subtle mutants of the SD1FQF/SD2 interface showed decreased sumoylation (Supplementary Figure 6b,c,e,f). Mutations in the RING C-terminal conserved TRIM dimeric interface (N106Rand/or L112R, as well as N106A/L112A) also impaired NB biogenesis and sumoylation (Supplementary Figure 6h,i). Collectively, these observations argue that PML RING tetramerization is essential for NB assembly and subsequent PML sumoylation in cellulo.

Fig. 4

PML tetramerization in NB assembly and PML sumoylation in cellulo. a Pml−/− MEFs stably expressing wild type HA-PML, HA-PMLF52/54E and HA-PMLL73E were analyzed by immuno-fluorescence using anti-HA antibodies (left, green). Scale bar is 5 μm. Statistical analyses (right). All experiments have been done in five independent replicates, NB count was from 10 to 20 nuclei. Values are means ± S.D. and One-way ANOVA (p-values) are indicated. b Western blot analysis demonstrating loss of sumoylation of these PML mutants, as detected by anti-HA antibodies. Uncropped images of all Western blots are shown in Supplementary Figures 9–12

Trans-complementation assays revealed that co-expression of CFP-WT PML fully restored NBs assembly of HA-PMLF52/54E, but not that of HA-PMLL73E which remained diffusely distributed despite a few aggregates (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Figure 7a). This difference in NB re-assembly suggests that the two L73-L73 interactions are required to stabilize the tetrameric torus, while fewer than four SD1FQF/SD2 interfaces may be sufficient. PML RING interacts with UBC9 and PML NBs efficiently recruit UBC9, especially under arsenic-induced oxidative stress2,15 (Fig. 5c). Critically, in our trans-complementation assays, CFP-WT PML co-expression restores efficient basal or arsenic-enhanced sumoylation of HA-PMLF52/54E, but never that of PMLL73E, mirroring NB-reformation (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Figure 7b). We then performed mammalian two-hybrid experiments with either full-length PML or its RING domain. Both demonstrated interaction of PML RING with UBC9, but not RING tetramer mutants (Fig. 5d and Supplementary Figure 7e). The rare NBs formed by PMLF52/54A did colocalize with UBC9, but FRAP experiment demonstrated a decreased time of half-recovery, suggesting thatdecreased affinity of this PML mutant with UBC9 may explain its inefficient SUMO-conjugation (Supplementary Figure 7c,d). Collectively, these observations support a role of RING tetramers for NB formation, direct or indirect UBC9 recruitment and PML sumoylation.

Fig. 5

PML tetramerization controls NB formation and PML sumoylation. a Immortalized Pml−/− MEFs were transduced with MSCV virus expressing PML or its mutants and subsequently transduced or not with CFP-PML. PML NBs were monitored by immuno-fluorescence using anti-HA antibody (red). DAPI is in blue. Scale bar is 5 μm. b Immortalized Pml−/− MEFs obtained in a were treated with As2O3 (10–6M, 1 h) and extracts were analyzed by Western blot using anti-HA or anti-CFP. PML and its sumoylated forms are indicated. c Co-localization of stably expressed HA-PML (red) and UBC9-GFP (green) basal condition (left) or upon 10−6M As2O3 for 1h (right). DAPI is in blue. Middle and bottom: Visualization of PML and UBC9 localization with/without arsenic. Scale bars are 5 μm (top) and 0.5 μm (middle and bottom). d Mammalian two-hybrid: relative luciferase activities (RLU) were used to estimate the interaction between UBC9 and PML/mutants. Statistical significance is indicated. All experiments have been done at least with three independent replicates. Values are means ± S.E. ***p < 0.001 are used to show statistically significant between recombinant derivatives. pACT-PML and pBIND-PML interaction is shown as a positive control

APL development and arsenic response require tetramerization

Using PML/RARA transgenic mice, we investigated whether PML RING tetramerization is important in APL development. PML/RARA, but not PML/RARAL73E, efficiently developed APL (Fig. 6a), in line with our observation that sumoylation of PML moiety is required for efficient leukemogenesis in vivo30. Previous studies have shown that the therapeutic effect of arsenic in APL is based on its ability to trigger PML or PML/RARA re-assembly in NBs, hyper-sumoylation and subsequent PML/RARA degradation7,21,31,32,33. Arsenic was unable to trigger NBs re-assembly and sumoylation of either PML/RARAF52/54E or PML/RARAL73E in Pml−/− MEFs (Fig. 6b,c). PML/RARAF52/54E or PML/RARAL73E efficiently transformed primary progenitors ex vivo—as assessed by increased clonogenic activity in semi-solid cultures. Yet, the mutants failed to undergo any arsenic-triggered NB re-assembly and terminal differentiation (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Figure 8a,b). Collectively, these data establish the requirement of RING tetramerization in APL development in vivo and arsenic response ex vivo.

Fig. 6

PML RING tetramerization is important for APL development and arsenic targeting of PML/RARA-transformed cells. a Survival data of MRP8-PML/RARA or -PML/RARAL73E transgenic mice42. b Pml−/− MEFs expressing HA-PML/RARA, HA-PML/RARAF52/54E or HA-PML/RARAL73E were treated with As2O3 (10–6M) prior to immunofluorescence analysis. Scale bar is 5 μm. c Sumoylation of HA-PML/RARA after 1 h of As2O3 exposure was monitored by Western blot using anti-RARA antibody41. d MGG staining of mouse hematopoietic progenitors transformed by PML/RARA and the indicated mutants after arsenic treatment (10–7M, 7 days). e Proposed model for NB assembly and PML sumoylation integrating the PML RING tetramer formation


PML RING, B boxes and coiled coil domains cooperate to assemble the insoluble NB scaffolds. We discovered that PML RING assembles into tetrameric torus whose formation requires highly evolutionarily conserved PML-specific residues located on the two contact points (Fig. 1b). Their mutations, which do not alter RING folding, abolish PML NB assembly, demonstrating the role of tetramers in higher order of macromolecular assembly (Figs. 24). These are likely stabilized by the C-terminal helix bundles, common to the RINGs of other TRIMs. Within the tetramer, L73 is absolutely essential, while the four SD1FQF/SD2 contacts quantitatively modulate NB-formation and sumoylation, most likely through tetramer stability (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figure 7a). Conformation of the extended loop containing SD1FQF could be regulated by phosphorylation of multiple serine residues in the uncommonly long PML N-terminus34 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Figure 3). PML RING tetramers constitute essential building blocks within larger macro-molecular scaffolds, directly or indirectly ensuring efficient UBC9 recruitment. PML sumoylation does not contribute to NB-biogenesis2. RING K65 sumoylation is unessential for NB-biogenesis (Supplementary Figure 6d), but could stabilize UBC9 binding2 and favor its activity towards other PML sites, notably K160. Arsenic, by targeting the B2 box35, accelerates PML NB formation and subsequent sumoylation, a process abolished when the torus interfaces are disrupted (Figs. 5,6 and Supplementary Figure 6,7). The fact that wt PML not only rescues PMLF52/54E NB formation but also its sumoylation supports the idea that PML sumoylation occurs in trans within mixed tetramer. Other TRIM proteins are endowed with RING-dependent E3-ubiquitin-ligase activities, dependent on their dimerization12,13,14. We propose that higher order PML RING assembly has endowed PML with the ability to yield NBs, recruit UBC9 and promote PML sumoylation, thus contributing to the functional diversification of the biochemical activity of TRIM family members.


Protein expression and purification

The pET32a vector encoding the PML RING49–104 domain (amino acids 49–104)36 and a longer RING1–119 (amino acids 1–119) were transformed into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Sangon) for protein production. The design of primer used in this study is shown in Supplementary Table 1 and 2. The recombinant protein containing a N-terminal cleavable (His)6 tag was induced with 200 μM IPTG (Sangon) and 20 μM ZnCl2 (Sangon) when the reading of OD600 reaches 0.8. The cells were grown at 22 °C for 14 h before harvest by centrifugation (4700g, 20 min).

The bacterial cells were resuspended in buffer containing (20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and lysed using a cell cracker (JNBIO) applying (20 kg cm−2) pressure. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and clean lysate was loaded onto a pre-equilibrated nickel sepharose column (His Trap HP, GE Healthcare). The column was washed with buffer containing (20 mM Tris, 20 mM Imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) and PML RING was eluted with buffer containing (20 mM Tris, 150 mM Imidazole, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0). The TRX-His tag was removed by digestion with Thrombin enzyme at room temperature overnight after the eluate was dialyzed against Thrombin digestion buffer (Sigma). The cleaved TRX-His tag and uncleaved PML RING were removed by recycle over a pre-equilibrated nickel column. PML RING was purified further with an anion exchange sepharose column (Q HP, GE Healthcare) and a hydrophobic interaction sepharose column (Phenyl HP, GE Healthcare). The correct mass of the protein was confirmed by MS analysis, and the purity was checked by SDS–PAGE.

Crystallization and data collection

PML RING crystals were grown in 48-well plates using the vapor diffusion technique. Then 0.5-μl PML RING (26 mg ml−1) was mixed with 0.5 μl reservoir solution (500 mM Ammonium Sulfate, 1 M Lithium Sulfate and 100 mM Sodium Citrate), and the plates were incubated at 4 °C for ~2 weeks. The crystals were stabilized in a 50:50 mixture of paraffin and paratone-N (Hampton Research), and then were flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Diffraction data were collected in Beamline station BL17U at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, Shanghai, China).

Phasing and structure refinement

The diffraction data were recorded at the wavelength of Zn anomalous dispersion peak (1.2824 Å) and subsequently processed, integrated and scaled using MOSFLM/SCALA25. The statistics of the data collection are shown in Supplementary Table 1. Single wavelength dispersion (SAD) method implemented in CRANK225 was used to phase PML RING. Eight Zn2+ positions were determined by CRUNCH225 using data between 20 and 1.6 Å. An interpretable map was obtained by solvent flattening using program SOLOMON25. The autotracing program ARP/wARP was then used to produce a σA-weighted 2Fo-Fc map for further manual model building. REFMAC537 was used for structural refinement. Intermittent manual building implemented in COOT25 was used to correct and improve the initial models produced by ARP/wARP38. The B-factors were refined with TLS corrections (4 TLS group, 84 parameters)37. The final model of PML RING tetramer contains 187 residues and 224 water molecules. Ramachandran statistics of PML RING calculated by PROCHECK39 indicate that 99.4% of the atoms are in the most favored region, and 0.6% are in the allowed regions. The detailed structure refinement statistics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Data collection and structure refinement statistics of PML-RING

Analytical ultracentrifugation and gel filtration analysis

Sedimentation experiments were conducted using a Beckman XL-I Optima analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with absorbance optics. Sedimentation studies were carried out at 200,000g, at 25 °C overnight. Three-channel with quartz windows were filled with 400 μl of sample (20 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, with/without 1 mM DTT) at the concentration of 1 mg ml−1. To investigate how protein concentration might influence PML RING tetramerization, the wild type protein at the higher concentration (5 mg ml−1) was also tested. Absorbance profiles were acquired at a wavelength of 335 nm, chosen according to the protein concentration. Data analysis was carried out using SEDFIT40, which employs the continuous c(s) conformational change model based on the Lamm equation, to determine the sedimentation coefficient distribution.

In order to check RING tetramerization in the context of full-length PML protein, gel filtration analysis was used. Recombinant proteins including PML∆BC (i.e., the deletion of residues, 120–360) and mutants were obtained by in vitro translation (Promega) using pcDNA3.1(−) vector with T7 promoter according to manufacturer’s standard protocol. The sample was then subjected to gel filtration analysis using Superose 6 and Superose 12 columns (GE) at a flow rate of 0.4 ml min−1. Each fraction was monitored by Western blot using antibody against PML (Abcam).

Cell culture and treatments

For expression in MEFs or progenitors, MSCV retroviral constructs were used, HA or CFP tags were in frame with 5′ PML coding sequence. Mutations were generated with the QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (QIAGEN) on MSCV-HA-His6-PML or pSG5-HA-His6-PML and subcloned in MSCV-HA-His6-PML (named HA-PML) or in MSCV-HA-His6-PML/RARA (HA-PML/RARA). Oligonucleotides used in all the constructs arelisted in Supplementary Table 2.

Immortalized Pml−/− MEF cells, obtained previously by large T expression in primary MEFs35, were transduced with MSCV virus expressing HA-His6-tagged WT or mutants. For rescue experiments, MEFs stably expressing HA-PMLs were transduced with MSCV-CFP-WT PML or MSCV-GFP. Immortalized Pml−/− MEF stably expressing HA-WT PML (or indicated mutants) were transduced with MSCV virus expressing UBC9-GFP as described in the figures. MEFs were treated with 10–6 M As2O3 (Fluka) for 1 h before protein extraction and Western blot analysis using anti-HA, anti-CFP, anti-GFP, and anti-Lamin antibodies.

Mouse haematopoietic progenitors (i.e., lineage-depleted bone marrow from 5-fluorouracil-treated C57BL/6 mice) were transduced with MSCV-HA-His6-PML/RARA or its mutants, cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with IL-3, IL-6 and stem cell factor and treated with 10–6 M As2O3 for 1 h. For FACS and MGG experiments, transduced cells were re-plated in methylcellulose at a density of 10,000 cells/dish in the presence or absence of 10–7 M As2O3. Cells were analyzed after 7 days using FACS according to manufacturer’s guidelines and MGG staining.

Immunoflorescence image acquision and Western blot

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Immunofluorescence assays were performed and analysed by confocal microscopy using the antibodies described below. The slides were examined with a Leica TCS SP8 or Zeiss LSM870 confocal fluorescent microscope. Protein extracts were prepared by lysing cells directly in Laemmli buffer. SUMO conjugates and PML proteins were separated on 4–12% gradient SDS–PAGE (Biorad). Homemade chicken polyclonal anti-human PML was previously described41. Mouse monoclonal anti-HA was from Covance, anti-GFP from Roche, rabbit polyclonal anti-CFP and goat polyclonal anti-lamin B antibodies from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-mouse cKit (CD117) and anti-mouse Mac1 antibodies were from BD pharmingen. Alexa 488- or 594-labeled secondary antibodies and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies from Jackson Laboratories.

For statistics, PML NBs were counted from at least 50 randomly chosen cells. The ratio between sumoylated and unmodified PML was calculated from Vilber Lourmat Fusion camera software. All experiments have been done at least with three independent replicates.

FRAP analysis

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) was performed on Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope equipped with a heated chamber. MEF cells expressing HA-PMLwt or HA-PMLF52/54A together with UBC9-GFP were seeded in glass-bottomed dish in HEPES-buffered DMEM media with 10% FBS and the dish was mounted on the stage in the confocal chamber pre-heated to 37 °C. The cells were observed under a 63× oil lens. The“region of interest (ROI)”containing only one PML NB was selected, and UBC9-GFP was bleached with a 488 nm argon laser at 100% intensity for 6 times. The means of relative intensity of UBC9-GFP fluorescence during fluorescent recovery were quantified from three independent experiments.

Transgenic mice

PML/RARA and PML/RARAL73E were expressed using human MRP8 promoter42. Mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions and all animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Experimental Animal Center in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. To define whether the mice have developed APL, hematological disorders such as splenomegaly, MGG staining and flow cytometry analysis of c-Kit, GR1 and Mac-1 in spleen and bone marrow cells were performed.

Circular dichroism

Samples for CD were prepared by desalting the bacterial expressed recombinant proteins and diluting them to 0.2 mg ml−1 using 10 mM CHES buffer (pH 9.0). Far UV CD spectra was recorded from 185 nm to 260 nm at 20 °C with a time constant of 1 s using a Chirascan spectrometer (Applied Photophysics Ltd). The spectra were the average of not less than three scans and presented as mean residue molar ellipticity [θ] (deg.cm2 dmol−1). Secondary structure content reported in Supplementary Figure 2b was estimated using Circular dichroism (CD) deconvolution program CDNN.

SEC-MALS analysis

The purified PML RING1–119 and mutants were subjected to gel filtration analysis (S100 column, GE Healthcare). The elution peaks, as monitored by UV absorption at 280 nm, were pooled separately and chosen for size exclusion chromatography-multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) characterization, respectively. In brief, the purified protein samples were concentrated and analyzed using a WTC-015S5 sized exclusion column (Wyatt Technology) which was connected to a 1260 infinity liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technology) equipped with inline DAWN HELEOS-II MALS and Optilab rEX differential refractive index detectors (Wyatt Technology). For each sample, a 40 μl injection volume and 0.5 ml min−1 flow rate were applied. Data were recorded and processed using ASTRA VI software (Wyatt Technology).

Small angle X-ray scattering

The recombinant PML RING49–104 was purified and concentrated to 1, 3 and 5 mg ml−1 in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, with/without 1 mM DTT, respectively. The X-ray scattering experiment was carried out at Beamline station BL19U2 (National Facility for Protein Science Shanghai, NCPSS, China) and scattered X-ray intensities were collected by using a Pilatus 1 M detector (DECTRIS Ltd). The measurements were carried out with 1 s exposure time and repeat for 20 times to avoid possible sample radiation damage. The collected data were processed with ATSAS software package43. The details of SAXS data collection and processing are shown in Supplementary Table 3. The guinier region of experimental group are linear, indicating the measured sample is homogeneous in solution. Crystal data fitting was done using the OLIGOMER algorism implemented in CRYSOL. In the analysis of crystal fitting (0.01 ≤ q ≤ 0.25 Å−1), the crystallographic tetramer, crystallographic dimers and crystallographic and NMR monomers were used to fit the merged experimental SAXS data derived from three protein concentrations, leading to the determination of each fraction of monomer/dimer/tetramer in the solutions.

Mammalian two-hybrid assay

Mammalian two-hybrid assay was performed using the CheckMateTM Mammalian Two-Hybrid System (Promega) in 293 T or CHO cells. The cDNA of UBC9 and full length WT PML or mutants were inserted into pBIND and pACT vectors, respectively. 293T cells were then transfected with plasmids pG5/luc, pBIND-UBC9 and pACT-PML/mutant (mixed at a molar ratio of 1:1:1) using liposome Lipo2000 transfection method (Life Technology). In the complementary set of experiments, UBC9 was cloned into pACT and the extended RING domain into pBIND. The resulting plasmids were transfected in CHO cells using Effecten (Quiagen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, luciferase activity was determined using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega).

Limited proteolysis

10 μg purified PML RING1–119 was subjected to chymotrypsin (Sigma) digestion at 25 °C for 20 min. The reaction mixture contained 10 µg RING1–119, a series dilutions from 10 μg chymotrypsin, 100 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 10 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM DTT. The reaction was terminated by boiling with SDS loading buffer. The sample was analyzed by SDS–PAGE followed by silver staining.

Mass spectrometry analysis was conducted with 5800 MALDI-TOF/TOF (AB Sciex). The limited digestion product was subjected to the PVDF (GE Healthcare) membrane transferring followed by Ponceau S staining to indicate the target protein band. Cropped PVDF membrane containing the target protein was placed into the reactor of the PPSQ-33A (SHIMADZU) automatic protein sequencer, followed by a standard analysis procedure.

Data availability

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 5YUF. Other data are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Change history

  • 04 May 2018

    In the originally published version of this Article, the authors Sai-Juan Chen and Zhu Chen were incorrectly listed as being affiliated with ‘University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U944, CNRS UMR7212, Equipe labellisée LNCC, Hôpital St. Louis 1, Paris 75475, France’, and the affiliation ‘Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences and Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China’ was inadvertently omitted. These errors have now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.


  1. 1.

    Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. & de The, H. PML nuclear bodies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000661 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sahin, U. et al. Oxidative stress-induced assembly of PML nuclear bodies controls sumoylation of partner proteins. J. Cell. Biol. 204, 931–945 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Reuter, N., Schilling, E.M., Scherer, M., Muller, R., Stamminger, T. The ND10 component promyelocytic leukemia protein acts as an E3 ligase for SUMOylation of the major immediate early protein IE1 of human cytomegalovirus. J. Virol. 91, 2335–16 (2017).

  4. 4.

    Pearson, M. et al. PML regulates p53 acetylation and premature senescence induced by oncogenic Ras. Nature 406, 207–210 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    de The, H., Le Bras, M. & Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. The cell biology of disease: acute promyelocytic leukemia, arsenic, and PML bodies. J. Cell. Biol. 198, 11–21 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Niwa-Kawakita, M. et al. PML is a ROS sensor activating p53 upon oxidative stress. J. Exp. Med. 214, 3197–3206 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    de The, H. & Chen, Z. Acute promyelocytic leukaemia: novel insights into the mechanisms of cure. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 775–783 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ablain, J. et al. Activation of a promyelocytic leukemia-tumor protein 53 axis underlies acute promyelocytic leukemia cure. Nat. Med. 20, 167–174 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    de The, H., Pandolfi, P. P. & Chen, Z. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: a paradigm for oncoprotein-targeted cure. Cancer Cell 32, 552–560 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Reymond, A. et al. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J. 20, 2140–2151 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Meroni, G. & Diez-Roux, G. TRIM/RBCC, a novel class of ‘single protein RING finger’ E3 ubiquitin ligases. Bioessays 27, 1147–1157 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hatakeyama, S. TRIM proteins and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 792–804 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Streich, F. C. Jr, Ronchi, V. P., Connick, J. P. & Haas, A. L. Tripartite motif ligases catalyze polyubiquitin chain formation through a cooperative allosteric mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 8209–8221 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yudina, Z. et al. RING dimerization links higher-order assembly of TRIM5alpha to synthesis of K63-linked polyubiquitin. Cell Rep. 12, 788–797 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Duprez, E. et al. SUMO-1 modification of the acute promyelocytic leukaemia protein PML: implications for nuclear localisation. J. Cell Sci. 112, 381–393 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Borden, K. L. et al. The solution structure of the RING finger domain from the acute promyelocytic leukaemia proto-oncoprotein PML. EMBO J. 14, 1532–1541 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Borden, K. L. et al. In vivo and in vitro characterization of the B1 and B2 zinc-binding domains from the acute promyelocytic leukemia protooncoprotein PML. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1601–1606 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Boddy, M. N., Duprez, E., Borden, K. & Freemont, P. S. Surface residue mutations of the pml ring finger domain alter the formation of nuclear matrix-associated pml bodies. J. Cell Sci. 110, 2197–2205 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Muller, S., Matunis, M. J. & Dejean, A. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J. 17, 61–70 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shen, T. H., Lin, H. K., Scaglioni, P. P., Yung, T. M. & Pandolfi, P. P. The mechanisms of PML-nuclear body formation. Mol. Cell 24, 331–339 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. et al. Role of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) sumolation in nuclear body formation, 11S proteasome recruitment, and As2O3-induced PML or PML/retinoic acid receptor alpha degradation. J. Exp. Med. 193, 1361–1371 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cuchet-Lourenco, D. et al. SUMO pathway dependent recruitment of cellular repressors to herpes simplex virus type 1 genomes. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002123 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Banani, S. F. et al. Compositional control of phase-separated cellular bodies. Cell 166, 651–663 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Huang, S. Y. et al. The RING domain of human promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML). J. Biomol. Nmr. 61, 173–180 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760–763 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dawidziak, D. M., Sanchez, J. G., Wagner, J. M., Ganser-Pornillos, B. K. & Pornillos, O. Structure and catalytic activation of the TRIM23 RING E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proteins 85, 1957–1961 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Keown, J. R., Yang, J. X., Douglas, J. & Goldstone, D. C. Characterisation of assembly and ubiquitylation by the RBCC motif of Trim5alpha. Sci. Rep. 6, 26837 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sanchez, J. G. et al. Mechanism of TRIM25 catalytic activation in the antiviral RIG-I pathway. Cell Rep. 16, 1315–1325 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Koliopoulos, M. G., Esposito, D., Christodoulou, E., Taylor, I. A. & Rittinger, K. Functional role of TRIM E3 ligase oligomerization and regulation of catalytic activity. Embo. J. 35, 1204–1218 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhu, J. et al. A sumoylation site in PML/RARA is essential for leukemic transformation. Cancer Cell. 7, 143–153 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nasr, R. et al. Eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia-initiating cells through PML-RARA degradation. Nat. Med. 14, 1333–1342 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhu, J. et al. Arsenic-induced PML targeting onto nuclear bodies: implications for the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3978–3983 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen, G. Q. et al. Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): I. As2O3 exerts dose-dependent dual effects on APL cells. Blood 89, 3345–3353 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hayakawa, F. & Privalsky, M. L. Phosphorylation of PML by mitogen-activated protein kinases plays a key role in arsenic trioxide-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Cell 5, 389–401 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Jeanne, M. et al. PML/RARA oxidation and arsenic binding initiate the antileukemia response of As2O3. Cancer Cell 18, 88–98 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang, X. W. et al. Arsenic trioxide controls the fate of the PML-RARalpha oncoprotein by directly binding PML. Science 328, 240–243 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Winn, M. D., Isupov, M. N. & Murshudov, G. N. Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 122–133 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458–463 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. Jnl Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schuck, P., Perugini, M. A., Gonzales, N. R., Howlett, G. J. & Schubert, D. Size-distribution analysis of proteins by analytical ultracentrifugation: strategies and application to model systems. Biophys. J. 82, 1096–1111 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. et al. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 547–555 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Brown, D. et al. A PML RAR alpha transgene initiates murine acute promyelocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2551–2556 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Franke, D. et al. ATSAS 2.8: a comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 1212–1225 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Engh, R. A. & Huber, R. Accurate bond and angle parameters for x-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A47, 392–400 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by research grants 81770142, 81370620, 81570120, 31070645 from National Scientific Foundation of China (to GM), “The Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institute of Higher Learning” (to GM), a research grant 20152504 from “Shanghai Municipal Education Commission—Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support” (to GM), a research grant 11JC1407200 from SMSTC (to GM), a research grant 12ZZ109 from SME (to GM), “Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10–9571)” (to GM). H.de Thé laboratory is supported by Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, CNRS, Collège de France, Université Paris-Diderot, Institut National du Cancer, Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (Griffuel Award to H. de Thé), the European Research Council (STEMAPL advanced grant to H. de Thé), the French National Research Agency (ANR) “Investissements d’Avenir” program (reference: ANR-11-PHUC-002) and SUMOPiv project. We thank the ‘plateau technologique de l′IUH, notably Niclas Setterblad for help with the imaging facility. We thank the staffs from BL17U/BL18U1/BL19U1/BL19U2/BL01B beamline of National Center for Protein Sciences Shanghai (NCPSS) at SSRF, for assistance during data collection. We thank Dr. Xiaoxia Yu (Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, China) for help in sedimentation experiment. We thank Drs. Shaoyong Lu and Jian Zhang (Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine) for assistance in MD analysis and colleagues, notably Morgane Le Bras and Cécile Esnault for careful reading of the manuscript.

Author information




Conceived and designed the experiments: V.L.B., Z.C., H.d.T. and G.M. Performed the experiments: P.W., S.B., H.W., V.L.B., T.Z., F.J., L.P., Y.L. Analyzed the data: P.W., S.B., H.W., V.L.B., T.Z., F.J., L.P., Y.L., S.J.C., Z.C., H.d.T., G.M. Preparation of the figures: P.W., S.B., H.W., V.L.B., T.Z., F.J., L.P., Y.L., S.J.C., Z.C., H.d.T., G.M. Wrote the paper: P.W., H.W., V.L.B., H.d.T., G.M.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhu Chen or Hugues de Thé or Guoyu Meng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Benhenda, S., Wu, H. et al. RING tetramerization is required for nuclear body biogenesis and PML sumoylation. Nat Commun 9, 1277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03498-0

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing