Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Chiral DOTA chelators as an improved platform for biomedical imaging and therapy applications

Abstract

Despite established clinical utilisation, there is an increasing need for safer, more inert gadolinium-based contrast agents, and for chelators that react rapidly with radiometals. Here we report the syntheses of a series of chiral DOTA chelators and their corresponding metal complexes and reveal properties that transcend the parent DOTA compound. We incorporated symmetrical chiral substituents around the tetraaza ring, imparting enhanced rigidity to the DOTA cavity, enabling control over the range of stereoisomers of the lanthanide complexes. The Gd chiral DOTA complexes are shown to be orders of magnitude more inert to Gd release than [GdDOTA]. These compounds also exhibit very-fast water exchange rates in an optimal range for high field imaging. Radiolabeling studies with (Cu-64/Lu-177) also demonstrate faster labelling properties. These chiral DOTA chelators are alternative general platforms for the development of stable, high relaxivity contrast agents, and for radiometal complexes used for imaging and/or therapy.

Introduction

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are commonly used for diagnosis and monitoring of many diseases. Over 30 million doses of GBCAs are administered worldwide annually1. However, since 2006, it was recognised that free gadolinium ions are associated with a rare, but devastating toxicity called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with renal impairment2, 3 leading to a contraindication of Gd-DTPA, Gd-DTPA-BMA and Gd-DTPA-BMEA in the patient population4. More recently, it has been found that gadolinium (Gd) can accumulate in the brains of patients, even those with normal renal function5,6,7. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has recommended to restrict the clinical use of some acyclic (linear) Gd agents and suspend the authorisations of others in order to prevent any risks that could potentially be associated with Gd brain deposition.

GBCAs can be classified into macrocyclic and acyclic agents based on the nature of the chelating moiety. Association of Gd with NSF and brain deposition is higher for the acyclic Gd(III) chelates, which are more kinetically labile than the macrocyclic chelates8. The Food and Drug Administration also announced that additional text explaining that linear GBCAs carry a greater risk than macrocyclic agents will be added to the label. It is well-known that free Gd is toxic; the ionic radius of Gd3+ (108 pm) is close to that of Ca2+ (114 pm) causing Gd3+ to act as a potent antagonist of many types of voltage-gated calcium channels at very-low concentrations9. [GdDOTA], with the scaffold of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), has the highest thermodynamic and kinetic stability among the clinically used GBCAs10. However, several animal studies showed Gd deposition was also detected in brains following [GdDOTA] administration11,12,13, so the development of safer, more inert GBCAs is needed.

High relaxivity is also critical for MRI contrast agents. A key molecular factor for relaxivity is the water exchange rate at the Gd ion. [GdDOTA] and other GBCAs have water exchange rates that are too slow for optimal relaxivity14. In addition to providing a stable complex with respect to Gd release, the ideal chelator should also enable an optimal water exchange rate in the 108–10s−1 range15,16,17.

Beyond MR contrast agents, the DOTA chelator has shown great utility for binding radiometals like In-111 and Cu-64 for imaging and Lu-177 and Y-90 for therapy18, 19. Inertness of the complex with respect to metal release is a key feature here as well. In addition, mild, rapid labelling conditions are necessary properties of the chelator, especially when the chelator is conjugated to a thermally sensitive biomolecule.

Herein, we present the synthesis and structural properties of chiral DOTA system as a platform for safer and high relaxivity MR contrast agents, and for rapid radiolabelling with radiometals. Five chiral DOTAs with various chiral groups are synthesised. No substitution is performed on the acetate pendant arms in order to retain the natural chelating properties of the cavity formed from the eight coordinate points of N(4) and O(4). The chiral substituents on the opposite side of the metal ion can be used for targeting or conjugating with other molecules, while allowing the coordinated water molecules to exchange freely. We find that our complexes have optimal water exchange kinetics and high stability that transcends [GdDOTA] significantly, thereby providing an ideal platform to be merged with various macromolecules or nanoparticles through multilocus binding or conjugation to become contrast agents with high relaxivity for clinical diagnosis. Radiolabelling studies with Cu-64 and Lu-177 also demonstrate the faster labelling properties of chiral DOTA than DOTA, making them excellent candidates for use as radiometal chelators. Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution are readily tuned by the choice of chiral substituent.

Results

Synthesis of chiral DOTA complexes

Five chiral DOTAs (L1L5) with various chiral groups were synthesised (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). We hypothesised that the chiral substituents would preorganize the chelator in a conformation favourable for metal ion binding, thereby increasing chelation kinetics. We further hypothesised that the chiral substituents would lock the conformation of the chelator making subsequent dechelation very slow. The synthesis of the twelve-membered ring of cyclen (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane) from an aziridine compound and the corresponding chiral substituted compounds have been studied for several decades20. However, literature examples of chiral cyclens are rare. The two backbones reported (with four methyl and four hydroxymethyls)21, 22 required very complicated synthetic procedures, which may be the main reason for their apparent unpopularity. The method of total synthesis of chiral cyclen with four 4-methoxybenzyl groups is even more daunting23. Interestingly, the better studied chiral cyclen compound (with four ethyl groups)20, 24 has no DOTA derivatives developed. In our work, we have improved and employed synthetic routes that simplifies the synthesis and purification of chiral cyclens.

Fig. 1
figure1

Synthetic procedures of chiral DOTA complexes. The chiral cyclens were synthesised from chiral aziridines followed by the incorporation of protected acetate arms and subsequent deprotections to give the final ligands. (a) TsOH/EtOH, RT (1a); (b) BF3·Et2O/Benzene, reflux (1b1d), 24 h; (c) TsOH/ACN, RT (1b, 1e); (d) Pd(OH)2/C, ammonium formate, trifluoroethanol, 50–75 °C, 16 h; (e) tert-butyl 2-bromoacetate, K2CO3, dry acetonitrile, 50–60 °C, 16 h; (f) TFA/DCM (1:1), 16 h; (g) 1 M HCl (L2L4); (h) LnCl3·6H2O, pH 7.0, 80 °C, 12 h (Ln = Eu(III), Yb(III) and Gd(III)), note for clarity the counterions are not depicted

The chiral cyclens (2a2e) were synthesised from chiral aziridines (synthesised from natural amino acids), catalysed by either TsOH or Lewis acid boron trifluoride diethyl etherate20,21,22. We found that if TsOH is used, changing the solvent from ethanol to acetonitrile gave higher conversions and isolated yields.

The resulted twelve-membered ring compounds are 4-fold symmetric with the chiral substituents symmetrically arranged around the cyclen ring at one side of the plane and the benzyl groups located on the other side. This was confirmed by both NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 1), with all four substituents in the S configuration, indicating that their absolute configurations did not change in the cyclization reactions. To further validate this, we crystallised both conformations of the enantiomeric 2b from different phenyl ring solvents. 3a3e are also 4-fold symmetric, confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy as there is only one set of resonances while 4a4e are dissymmetric, as the four bulky tert-butyl acetate groups contributed to a crowded molecular environment with little freedom for rearrangement. Yet after removing the tert-butyl groups by deprotection, L1L5 were obtained in the form of either trifluoroacetic or hydrochloride salts and became 2-fold symmetric, with two sets of resonances with a ratio of ~1:1 observed. The respective lanthanide chiral DOTA complexes were synthesised by mixing the ligands and the metal ions and stirred at 80 °C for 12 h (pH 7.0). Single crystals of [GdL4] suitable for single X-ray diffraction were grown by slow evaporation of a solution mixture of DMF/H2O 1:10 (v/v). The geometry of [GdL4] was found to be TSAP/side (vide infra).

Fig. 2
figure2

Crystal structures of ligands 2b, 2c and complex [GdL4]. a Crystal structure of 2b (SSSS-λλλλ), 2b (SSSS-δδδδ) and 2c. b Crystal structure of [GdL4] from top view, bottom view and side view. Atom labels: C (grey), N (blue), and O (red); H atoms omitted for clarity

Structural isomerism of chiral DOTA complexes

In aqueous solution, the ratio of TSAP/SAP isomers of Eu(III) and Yb(III) complexes in DOTA-like systems can be easily identified by 1H NMR as two well-defined sets of six resonances are observed for the diastereotopic CH2CO and ring NCH2CH2N protons25. For Gd(III) complexes, although they cannot be analysed by NMR, their ratios of isomers are expected to be similar to the Eu(III) because the ionic radius of Gd(III) is very similar to that of Eu(III). No detectable change in the ratio of isomers was observed in the 1H NMR spectra of the complexes after storing for 6 months at room temperature. The 1H NMR spectra of the five Eu(III) chiral DOTA complexes are compared in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure3

1H NMR spectra of Eu complexes. 1H NMR spectra of [EuL1] to [EuL5] with isolated SAP isomer [EuL2A] and TSAP isomer [EuL2B] of [EuL2] as isomer identification reference. The spectra gave ligand-dependent TSAP/SAP isomer ratios when Eu(III) is complexed with different ligands; attributed to the different substituents on the macrocyclic ring. The integrations of both isomer peaks are listed in parentheses with the integration of SAP isomer set as 1

It has been established that in solution, the square antiprismatic (SAP) structure is characterised by a shift to a higher frequency of the closest of the ring axial protons, while this resonance is less shifted for the twisted square antiprism (TSAP) isomer26. The isomer ratio of TSAP/SAP increased from 0.75 for [EuL1] to 1.27 for [EuL2] (in D2O, pD ~7.0). The trend is more pronounced with [EuL3] (6.52) and [EuL4] (13.50) as their TSAP isomers became more dominant (for these compounds, a 1:1 mixture of deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide and deuterium oxide was used to overcome solubility issues). This variation of isomer ratio accords with the general observations that increasing the steric demand at the bound metal ion favours the TSAP geometry25. However, only the SAP isomer was obtained for [EuL5], which may be related to the change in solvation environment around the butyl chain caused by the polar terminal amine group; more interestingly, we found these isomers could be easily isolated by reversed-phase HPLC (except for [EuL1]).

To further demonstrate the variation tendency of TSAP/SAP isomer ratio between these five ligands, the 1H NMR spectra of the Yb(III) complexes were studied as well (Fig. 4). The ratio of TSAP/SAP isomers for [YbL1] (0.28) and [YbL2] (0.93) are relatively lower than the Eu(III) analogues; a minor isomer (0.09) that was described in [YbL1] was also observed27. The ratio of [YbL3] is similar to [YbL2] and those for [YbL4] and [YbL5] are consistent with their europium analogues. The difference in chemical shifts for complexes of L4 is attributed to the aromatic nature of the benzyl substituent compared to the alkyl nature of the other compounds.

Fig. 4
figure4

1H NMR spectra of Yb complexes. 1H NMR spectra of [YbL1] to [YbL5]. The spectra gave ligand-dependent TSAP/SAP isomer ratios when Yb(III) is complexed with different ligands; attributed to the different substituents on the macrocyclic ring. The integrations of both isomer peaks are listed in parentheses with the integration of SAP isomer set as 1

When the complexation conditions of [EuL2] and [YbL2] were used for [GdL2], the ratio of TSAP/SAP of [GdL2] was ~1:1 in the RP-HPLC trace, and the isolated yields for these two isomers were 46% (first peak, SAP) and 48% (second peak, TSAP), respectively. It is important to note that if the pH was adjusted to ~8.0 right after the addition of ligand, 70% of SAP and 25% of TSAP isomers would be obtained. This also emphasises that these two isomers formed are not interconvertible, and that the ratios of TSAP/SAP are determined by reaction kinetics. This makes it synthetically practical to control the isomerization by regulating the complexation conditions. Such phenomena were also observed with the similar NB-DOTA systems28. Another interesting discovery described in the Ln-NB-DOTA system is that the change in size/ionic radii of the Ln(III) metal ion does not influence the regioisomeric distribution28, and this also applies for our complexes (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Stability studies of the chiral DOTA complexes

[EuL2A] and [EuL2B] showed extreme inertness upon heating at 90 °C (pD 7.0 and 6.0, respectively) for 3 days (Supplementary Fig. 3 & 4); no signs of racemization were observed in [EuL2A] either after heating for 3 days at pD 1.0 (Supplementary Fig. 5), nor did the presence of 1 equivalent of Zn2+ caused any instability (Supplementary Fig. 6).

The kinetic stability of GBCAs, which reflects the dissociation of the Gd ions from its chelate is used to predict the stability in vivo10. The proton-assisted dissociation and direct attack of the endogenous ions are regarded as two main pathways that induced the dissociation of the chelates10. The inertness of our Gd(III) complexes was maintained up to 7 days after addition of 1000 equivalents of a competitive ligand, DTPA (Supplementary Fig. 7 & 8). Monitored by RP-HPLC29, [GdL2A] and [GdL2B] were also stable under both acidic and alkaline conditions, showing negligible decomplexation in 1N HNO3 (Supplementary Fig. 9 & 10) and 0.1N NaOH (Supplementary Fig. 11 & 12) over 10 days. The harshest condition tried was setting the complexes of [GdL2A], [GdL2B] and [GdDOTA] in 1N HCl (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. 1315). [GdL2A] and [GdL2B] are much more stable than [GdDOTA]; there was almost no decomplexation for [GdL2A] (SAP isomer), and only minimal decomplexation for [GdL2B] (TSAP isomer) after 487 h, while the half-life of [GdDOTA] was found to be shorter than 25 h. Their stability was maintained and no interconversion was observed with one equivalent of DOTA ligand in 1N HCl solutions of [GdL2A] and [GdL2B] (Supplementary Fig. 16). The complex [GdL2A] is also more stable than [GdDOTA] in the presence of 100 equivalents of zinc chloride at 50 °C. The half-life of [GdDOTA] was ~100 h under this condition, while no obvious decomplexation was observed for the complex of [GdL2A] during the same time (Supplementary Fig. 17 & 18).

Fig. 5
figure5

Stability of Gd complexes. ac RP-HPLC traces of [GdL2A], [GdL2B] and [GdDOTA] in 1N HCl at room temperature over time. d Change in peak area integration over time. Quantitative analysis with RP-HPLC suggest [GdL2A] and [GdL2B] exhibit much higher stability than [GdDOTA] in acidic medium at room temperature. Error bars for [GdL2A]- and [GdL2B]- refer to the standard error of mean (S.E.M.), statistical data fitting analysis (n = 3; s.e.m.)

So why are the chiral DOTA complexes more stable than [GdDOTA]? In general, four different diastereomers are formed in the process of complexation with DOTA. Two pairs of enantiomers result in four stereoisomers that could interconvert in solution by ring-flip or rotation of the acetate pendant arms to give either monocapped SAP or monocapped TSAP geometries30. With four substituents, two of these isomeric structures are restricted and hence are not interconvertible (Fig. 6). The freezing of the mobility on the macrocyclic ring stabilised the chelate itself, while the steric hindrance prevents the interaction of the metal ion and the outer species, such as the transmetallation and acid catalysed decomplexation. In past studies with one benzyl group substituted on the macrocyclic ring, the resultant complexes showed relatively lower stability than [GdDOTA]. The presence of corner and side regioisomers is illustrated in complexes of Ln-NB-DOTA28 and Ln-NB-DOTAM31. There are two pairs of interconvertible isomers for Ln-NB-DOTA28, however, due to the symmetry and sterics introduced into our systems, such regioisomers are eliminated (Fig. 6). This also indicates that the α-substitutions on the acetate arms (for [LnM4DOTMA])32 caused the structure to be too crowded, and lowered the stability to yield interconvertible isomers.

Fig. 6
figure6

Restricted isomerism of [GdL3]. Four stereoisomers are possible for [LnDOTA], but two of these structures are inaccessible with our system, they are represented by the washed out structures. SAP/corner and TSAP/side structures derived from the partial solved crystallographic data of [GdL3]; R represents the chiral substituent. Atom labels: C (grey), N (blue) and O (red); H atoms omitted for clarity

Water exchange rates and relaxivity properties

It is evident that our chiral DOTAs can be selectively controlled to form TSAP/SAP isomers. This is very important because it is known that the TSAP/SAP isomers can exhibit very different water exchange kinetics of the inner-sphere coordinated water. Table 1 shows the summary of the mean residence time of the water co-ligand at 310K and enthalpy of activation of water exchange for Gd(III) complexes of L1–L5 and their similar compounds.

Table 1 Coordination and fitting parameters 17O relaxation profiles

All our complexes have very-fast water exchange kinetics (fitting profiles were shown in Supplementary Fig. 19). The water residence time (τM310K, inverse of exchange rate) of [GdL1], with one coordinated water molecule, was measured to be 13 ± 0.4 ns; it is a weighted average for all the coordination isomers present. The τM310K values of [GdL2A] and [Gd(R)L2A], diastereomer and enantiomer of [GdL2], respectively, were measured to be 6.6 ± 0.4 ns and 8.1 ± 0.4 ns; whereas the τM310K of [GdL2B] and [Gd(R)L2B] are 1.1 ± 0.1 ns and 2.9 ± 0.1 ns. [GdL5], exclusively in SAP geometry, has a τM310K of 16 ± 0.8 ns. These very-short water residence times are all close to the optimum value for the inner-sphere contribution in the MRI T1-shortening contrast agents as predicted by the Solomon–Bloembergen–Morgan (SBM) theory.

Biodistribution studies and in vivo MRI

Most commercially available Gd(III)-based MRI contrast agents are excreted rapidly and exclusively through the renal pathway. One of the few exceptions is an acyclic compound, Gd-EOB-DTPA, which has a mixed clearance (50% renal, 50% biliary) and is used for imaging of the liver and biliary system33. Gd-BOPTA and MS-325 have predominantly renal elimination with <10% elimination through the biliary system. The blood half-life of MS-325 is unusually long owing to extensive serum albumin binding34, 35. We illustrated with our studies that there is a significant variation in the biodistribution profiles despite the small structural differences of the chiral substituents (Supplementary Fig. 20). Gd biodistribution in BALB/c mice was measured by ICP-MS at 5, 15, 30, 60, 180 and 360 min following injection. For the control/parent [GdDOTA], we observed rapid elimination from the body via the kidneys as expected36. Low levels of Gd(III) are present at 6 h post injection. On the other hand, with the tetramethyl-substituted [GdL1], near equal renal and hepatic clearance was observed. The tetraethyl derivative [GdL2] was mainly distributed in the liver but its retention time in the liver was quite short; with negligible amounts of Gd(III) detected after 60 min from the ICP-MS studies. The specific and unusual localisation of [GdL2] in the liver makes it a potential hepatobiliary-specific MRI contrast agent. Another interesting discovery was observed for [GdL5], where the localisation profile is mainly in the kidney and showed no tendency of clearance after 6 h; thus, we hypothesise that the four primary amino groups on the tetraaza ring may be recognised by transporters in the cortex of the kidney. Moreover, it is important and encouraging to note that minimal distribution in the brain was observed for all the compounds, implying our contrast agents are less toxic for clinical use.

Dynamic T1-weighted MR imaging at 4.7 tesla was performed with C57/Bl6 mice before, during, and after 0.1 mmol per kg injection of each compound (Fig. 7). For [GdL1], some enhancement of the liver and gall bladder and enhancement of the kidneys were observed as the contrast agent cleared, but 60 min post injection, the signal in the kidneys was similar to that at baseline. For [GdL2B], profound enhancement of the liver and gall bladder was observed, indicating efficient uptake by hepatocytes and elimination into the bile. Kidney enhancement was also observed at early time points, but by 60 min the kidney signal approached baseline. [GdL2A] showed a very similar behaviour to [GdL2B] but not [GdL5], where very little enhancement in the liver was observed.

Fig. 7
figure7

MR imaging in mice. Dynamic T1-weighted MR images at 4.7 tesla in C57/Bl6 mice before, after 0.1 mmol per kg injection of [GdL1], [GdL2B] and [GdL5]. Axial images of the liver (L) and gall bladder (arrow) coronal images of the kidneys highlighting the differences in elimination route and organ enhancement among the complexes

In the kidneys, enhancement of the entire organ was observed immediately after injection. Over time, the signal in the medulla and renal pelvis approached baseline levels whereas the renal cortex remained strongly enhanced, indicative of retention of the compound [GdL5]. Ex vivo biodistribution 2 h after injection confirmed the imaging findings with over 90 nmol Gd per g kidney in the animal receiving [GdL5], compared to ≤20 nmol Gd per g kidney with other contrast agents. The concentration of Gd(III) in the gall bladder was extremely high (854 and 1066 nmol per g) for [GdL2A] and [GdL2B], too (Supplementary Table 2).

Radiometal labelling properties of L2

The labelling conditions were first evaluated with non radioactive ions. LCMS showed the labelling of L2 with Cu(II) was fast at pH 6.0 at room temperature. The complexation of L2 and Cu(II) salt completed nearly immediately after Cu(II) addition (Supplementary Fig. 21). Next our ligand was tested with cold Lu(III) as 177Lu(III) is a good radioisotope in radiotherapy. The labelling of L2 with Lu(III) occurred at pH 7.0 at room temperature with the metal to ligand ratio 1:1, while higher temperature is needed to get higher conversion, which was monitored by LCMS (Supplementary Fig. 22 & 23).

Similar to cold labelling, instantaneous formation of 64CuL2 with the radioactive isotope 64Cu was observed using radio-HPLC (pH 6.1, room temperature) with near quantitative radiochemical yield. Radiochemical yield of 100 % was achieved after brief heating at 40 °C for 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 24, Supplementary Table 3). In comparison, the radiochemical yield of 64CuDOTA under the same conditions was 89% upon mixing at room temperature and 95% after heating at 40 °C for 30 min (Supplementary Fig. 25).

In another radiolabeling study with 177Lu(III), it was found that at least 80 °C was required to obtain [177LuL2]. The radiochemical yield of [177LuL2] was near quantitative after 20–40 min at 95 °C (pH 5.0) with the highest radiochemical yield over 95% (Fig. 8, Supplementary Fig. 26, Supplementary Table 4). Compared to the formation of [177LuL2] at the same conditions, [177LuDOTA] formation was slower with a radiochemical yield of 38% when heated at 95 °C (Fig. 8, Supplementary Fig. 27). Last but not least, [177LuL2] can also be obtained in pH 7.0 with an excellent radiochemical yield of 97% (95 °C, 20 min), which is not achievable at such mild pH conditions with DOTA. All of these results indicate that L2 is a much better ligand than DOTA for complexation of these two radioisotopes.

Fig. 8
figure8

Radiolabeling yields of 177Lu complexes. A graph of the radiolabeling yields of L2 and DOTA with 177Lu(III) against time at 95 °C in pH 5.0 buffer, showing that L2 is a better chelator for 177Lu(III)

The stability of the complex is also a key parameter that needs to be considered for a radiometal chelate19. The stability of CuDOTA and CuL2 was compared by UV-Visible spectra. In 1N HCl, CuDOTA showed rapid decomplexation, and the half-life of the complex at these conditions was similar to the [GdDOTA] (<24 h) (Supplementary Fig. 28). The chiral version of CuL2 under the same conditions was much more stable. Because the ionic radii of Lu(III) is very close to Yb(III), so we used the Yb(III) as a surrogate to study the stability. Monitored by 1H NMR, the complex of [YbDOTA] in 1N DCl also decomplexed very fast, but no obvious decomplexation was observed for the complex of [YbL2] (Supplementary Fig. 29). Additionally, we examined in vitro serum stability of 64CuL2 at 37 °C. The radiochemical purity of 64CuL2 decreased by less than 0.3 and 6.3% after 1 h and 24 h of incubation, respectively.

Discussion

The conformation of the Gd(III)-based complexes plays a significant role in the water exchange rate kex (kex = 1/τM)37. It has been shown that the kex in the TSAP configuration is 10–100 times faster than SAP, with the former useful as T1-shortening contrast agents, and the latter desirable as paramagnetic chemical exchange saturation contrast agents38, 39. Chiral DOTAs directly influenced the conformation of their lanthanide complexes. The ratio of formation of TSAP and the SAP isomers of these chiral DOTA lanthanide complexes can be controlled by the choice of functional groups used; as the bulkiness of these substituents increases, the ratio of TSAP/SAP also increases; over 93% of TSAP isomer of [LnL4] was obtained when benzyl groups were used. However, when four aminobutyl groups, which are more flexible and bulky, were introduced in [LnL5], ~100% of SAP geometry was formed. High temperature 1H NMR experiments confirmed that the ratios of isomers are stable and displayed no obvious change over various temperatures. Studies with different Ln(III) ions also revealed no change in the isomer ratios, dismissing the influence of metal ion size. Besides MRI, the control of the stereoisomerism of the complexes is also very important for some other applications: The stereoisomeric purity of chiral luminescent lanthanide complexes are crucial for circularly polarised luminescence (CPL) applications30, 40; Such rigid paramagnetic complexes are also ideal pseudocontact shift tags for proteins for NMR studies in solution and even in cells41, 42.

Gd-DOTMA and Gd-NB-DOTMA (S-RRRR), have relatively fast water exchange rates in the TSAP geometry43, 44. However, the study of Gd-NB-DOTMA found that a faster water exchange rate gave a less efficiency than the slower one as the hydration state (q r−6) is inversely proportional45. However, we found no difference in relaxivities between the SAP and TSAP isomers in our study. From the structures of the complexes, we noted that the substitution on the α-position of acetate arms of the DOTA complex may change the cavity of the chelator more than the substitutions on the tetraaza ring; this is because the hydrophobic bulky substituents near the coordinated water might affect the interaction of the inner and outer sphere water molecules. While for our chiral DOTA complexes, the coordination of the water molecule in the first sphere of the metal ions are retained like their parent [GdDOTA] complex, for the complexes with very-short water residence time (s), like [GdL2B], the water residence time is optimal for designing contrast agents with high relaxivity at high magnetic fields (≥3 tesla)46,47,48.

The r1 values of [GdL1], [GdL2] ([GdL2A], [GdL2B], [Gd(R)L2A], [Gd(R)L2B]) and [GdL5] are largely invariant in water at 1.4 T, 37 °C. Given the similar molecular weights and similar chemical structures, one expects similar rotational correlation times for these complexes. The similar relaxivities suggest that the hydration number for these compounds is the same and q = 1 by analogy to the Gd-DOTA-type complexes (Table 2). The molecular weights of all the complexes are greater than [GdDOTA], which results in modestly higher relaxivities. We also measured relaxivities in 4.5% (w/v) human serum albumin (HSA) solution and in human plasma. The relaxivities are slightly elevated in these media but not more than [GdDOTA], suggesting little to no plasma protein binding. The favourable properties of these Gd complexes, such as fast and tunable water exchange kinetics, kinetic inertness with respect to Gd release, and ease of derivatization indicate that the chiral DOTA technology will serve as a very-useful platform in the design of high relaxivity and targeted MRI contrast agents49,50,51. For example, our chiral cyclen platform enables four inert substituents on the other side of the tetraaza plane to be potentially conjugated with four binding moieties to minimise the rotation of the whole molecule, therefore enabling maximum relaxivity enhancement. Such a strategy to achieve multilocus binding has been proven successful in the literature52,53,54.

Table 2 Relaxivities of Gd complexes

Our chiral modifications of the ring have forced the four acetate groups to form a natural cavity, which enables better chelation. This is in contrast to the normal DOTA chelate in which, with only four acetate groups, the pendant arms form a more disordered structure, thus having a lower entropy in the process of sequestering the metal ions; hence, we predict that leads to a much more rapid complexation rate. This resonates with our hypothesis that the formation of natural cavity in our chiral DOTA ligands from having four extra substituents on the same side simplifies the structural preorganisation step in the complexation leading towards fast complexation.

In summary, we demonstrated the synthesis of a series of chiral DOTA chelators with four substituents symmetrically arranged around the cyclen ring. Our chiral DOTA Gd(III) complexes display faster water exchange kinetics (τM 1.1–16 ns at 310K) than [GdDOTA] and are stable at harsh temperature and extreme pH environments. To the best of our knowledge, only one lanthanide complex has been published with comparable kinetic inertness thus far55.These complexes also have unique biodistribution profiles for organ-specific applications, such as the hepatobiliary-specific [GdL2] and show near-zero distribution in mice brains. The work shows that our chiral DOTA chelators, in terms of structural rigidity, inertness, water exchange kinetics and fast radiolabelling properties have clearly transcended the DOTA ligand, and show promise as an ideal platform for the development of safer and more efficient agents for potential applications as protein tags for NMR and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies, highly efficient MRI contrast agents and radiometal chelators for PET or SPECT imaging.

Methods

General materials and methods

Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals were of reagent-grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or Acros Organics and used without further purification, (2 S)-1-Benzyl-2-ethylaziridine, (S)-1-benzyl-2-isobutylaziridine and (S)-1,2-dibenzylaziridine were ordered from Beijing Peridachem Co., Ltd. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ultrashield 400 Plus NMR spectrometer (at 400 MHz and 100 MHz, respectively) or a Bruker Ultrashield 600 Plus NMR spectrometer (at 600 MHz and 150 MHz, respectively). Unless otherwise specified, chemical shifts δ were expressed in parts per million (ppm) based on the residual solvent signal in DMSO-d6 (δ 2.50 ppm), D2O (δ 4.79 ppm), CD3OD (δ 3.31 ppm) or tetramethylsilane in CDCl3 (δ 0.00 ppm), and coupling constants J are given in Hz. Coupling patterns are abbreviated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), dd (doublets of double), ddd (doublets of doublets of doublet), dt (doublets of triple), dtd (doublets of triplets of doublet), dq (doublets of quartet), and m (multiplet). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was performed using an Agilent 1100 series apparatus with an LC/MSD trap and Daly conversion dynode detector with UV detection at 220, 254, and 280 nm. The method used on this system is as follows: Restek ultraaqueous C18 column (100 × 4.6 mm); eluent A: 10 mM ammonium acetate in water, B: 90% acetonitrile/10% 10 mM ammonium acetate in water; gradient: 5% B was held for 2 min before increasing the fraction of B to 50% over 10 min. The column was washed with 95% B for 2 min and then ramped to 5% B. The system was re-equilibrated at 5% B for 2 min. Reverse-phase semi-preparative purification was performed on either of these two systems. System A: Rainin Dynamax HPLC system with UV detection from 220 to 280 nm using a Restek Ultraaqueous C18 Column (250 × 10 mm). The mobile phase A was water with 10 mM ammonium acetate added; mobile phase B was 90% acetonitrile/10% water with 10 mM ammonium acetate added. The method used for purification is as follows: starting from 95% A/5% B, the fraction of B increased to 50% over 23 min. The column was washed with 95% B for 2 min and then ramped to 5% B. The system was re-equilibrated at 5% B for 3 min. System B: Waters HPLC system with UV detection from 210 to 280 nm using a Waters C18 Column (250 × 19 mm). The mobile phase A was water with 10 mM ammonium formate added; mobile phase B was 90% acetonitrile/10% water with 10 mM ammonium formate added; The method used for purification is as follows: starting from 95% A/5% B, the fraction of B increased to 50% over 23 min. The column was washed with 95% B for 2 min and then ramped to 5% B. The system was re-equilibrated at 5% B for 3 min. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry was performed using an Agilent 1260 Infinity Series apparatus with Agilent 6540 UHD Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS detection in the range of 100–3000. The method used on this system is as follows: Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD 1.8 µm column (50 × 2.1 mm), eluent A: water with 0.1% formic acid, eluent B: acetonitrile. Radio-HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1260 Infinity Series apparatus with Phenomenex Luna 5 u C18(2) 100 Å (150 × 4.6 mm); eluent A: water with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, eluent B: acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.

Syntheses

All the compounds were fully characterized. Experiment details and characterisations are given in Supplementary Methods (NMR spectra were shown in Supplementary Figs. 3082, high resolution ESI-MS of complexes were shown in Supplementary Figs. 8392).

Relaxivity and water exchange rate measurements

Relaxivity measurements were performed on a Bruker mq60 Minispec at 1.41T and 37 °C. Longitudinal (T1) relaxation times were measured using an inversion recovery experiment with 10 inversion times of duration ranging between 0.05 × T1 and 5 × T1. Transverse (T2) relaxation times were measured using a CPMG pulse sequence. Relaxivity (r1, r2) was determined from the slope of a plot of 1/T1,2 vs [Gd] for at least 4 concentrations of Gd(III) (data shown in Supplementary Figs. 93110). The T2 relaxation times of 17O at 11.7T were estimated from the full-width at half-height of the H217O resonance at temperatures ranging from 278 to 368K. Reduced relaxation rates (1/T2r) were calculated by taking the difference of 1/T2 measured in the presence and absence of Gd(III) and dividing by the mole fraction of coordinated water molecules, assuming q = 1. This data was plotted vs reciprocal temperature and fit to a 4-parameter model dependent on water exchange and electronic relaxation as described previously56. However, at the high magnetic field used, and because of the very-fast water exchange rates observed, there was negligible contribution of T1e, and the data were refit to a two-parameter model using the water exchange rate at 310K (τM) and enthalpy of activation for water exchange (ΔH) as adjustable parameters. The Gd-O hyperfine coupling constant, A/ħ, was assumed to be -3.8 × 10rad s−1 57, 58. Samples were prepared in neat H2O adjusted and enriched with a small amount of H217O.

Gd quantification

Gd concentrations were determined using an Agilent 8800-QQQ ICP-MS system. All samples were diluted with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 5% nitric acid. Lutetium internal standard was steadily introduced to the ICP-MS from an external source during the analysis. A linear calibration curve for each metal ranging from 0.1 ppb to 200 ppb was generated daily for the quantification.

Protein binding

Measurements were performed on a series of solutions ranging between 15-400 µM Gd complex in either 4.5% wt/v (HSA) or human blood plasma. A volume of 500 µL of each solution was placed within a Millipore Ultra Free MC 30 kDa cutoff filtration vessel and 20 µL of the solution was forced through the filter by centrifugation. Gd content in each unfiltered solution and filtrate were quantified by ICP-MS. The percentage of each complex bound to albumin was determined from the difference in Gd concentrations between unfiltered solution and filtrate.

In Vivo MR imaging

Imaging was performed at 4.7T using a small-bore animal scanner (Bruker Biospec). Pilot dynamic MRI studies were performed with [GdL1], [GdL2A], [GdL2B] and [GdL5]; n = 1 per compound. Six to eight weeks male C57/Bl6 mice were anaesthetised with isoflurane (1%–2%) and placed in a specially designed cradle with body temperature maintained at 37 °C. The tail vein was catherised for intravenous delivery of the contrast agent while the animal was positioned in the scanner. A pneumatic pillow was placed on the mouse to enable respiratory monitoring (SA Instruments), and the animal’s body temperature was maintained with warm air. The imaging protocol utilised a three-dimensional fast low angle shot (3D FLASH) with a 12 °C flip angle, 9.00 ms repetition rate, 2.39 ms echo time, 4.8 cm × 2.4 cm × 2.4 cm field of view with a 0.3 mm isotropic resolution. Images were acquired with either 2 or 8 averages giving an acquisition time of 2 min or 8 min, respectively. Baseline images were acquired with both 2 and 8 averages, then the Gd complex (0.1 mmol per kg) was injected intravenously and the sequence with 2 averages was repeated for a period of 10 min to monitor blood clearance. At 10, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 min after probe injection, the sequence with 8 averages was repeated to monitor the clearance of contrast from the liver and kidneys. After imaging was performed, the mouse was removed from the scanner and euthanized at 2 h post injection and the tissues were harvested for Gd quantification by ICP-MS.

Gd complexes biodistribution studies

Complexes [GdL1], [GdL2] and [GdL5] were prepared by dissolving in saline solution, while [GdDOTA] (Dotarem) was diluted in saline solution. Eight-week-old male BALB/c mice (purchased from BioLASCO, Taiwan) each weighing approximately 25 g were administered with a single dose of 0.025 mmol/kg compound ([GdL1], [GdL2], [GdDOTA] and [GdL5]; 3 mice per compound per time point) in a 100 μl volume via lateral tail vein injection. The mice were then euthanized, and their blood collected by cardiac puncture at each time point (5, 15, 30, 60, 180 or 360 min post injection). A control group of 4 mice was treated with saline and killed at time point 0. The liver, lung, heart, kidneys, spleen and brain were removed from the animals and weighed. Gd content in tissue and blood samples was quantified via ICP-MS analysis. All experiments were performed in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Massachusetts General Hospital or by the Department of Health of the Hong Kong Government and the Animal Subjects Ethics Sub-Committee of Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

64Cu labelling

Vials containing 5 nmol of L2 or DOTA (Macrocyclics, Plano, TX) [2.5 μL of 2 mM solutions in water], and 50 μL of 0.5 M NH4OAc buffer (pH 6.05) were mixed with 1.5 µL of 64CuCl2 solution (1.0 mCi, from Washington University). The reaction solutions were mixed and briefly centrifuged. A small aliquot was taken immediately and diluted with 50 µL of 0.5 M NH4OAc (pH 6.05) and analysed by radio-HPLC. The mixtures were then heated to 40 °C for 20 min. A small aliquot was taken and analysed by radio-HPLC to quantify radiochemical yields.

177Lu labelling

Vials containing 4 nmol of L2 (2 μL of 2 mM solution in water), and 100 μL of 0.5 M NH4OAc buffer (pH range from 4.0 to 7.0) were mixed with 0.2 μL of 177LuCl3 (in 0.1 M HCl; MURR, Columbia, MO). The reaction mixtures were mixed, briefly centrifuged and left to react at specific temperatures. A small aliquot of the crude labelling mixtures was taken at each time point and analysed by radio-HPLC to quantify radiochemical yields.

Data availability

The X-ray crystallographic data has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre with deposition number (CCDC 1517731), (CCDC 1517730), (CCDC 1517732), (CCDC 1517729), (CCDC 1445318) and (CCDC 1497014). This data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving. html. All other data supporting the finding in this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information, as well as from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Gulani, V., Calamante, F., Shellock, F. G., Kanal, E. & Reeder, S. B. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 16, 564–570 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grobner, T. Gadolinium–a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21, 1104–1108 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marckmann, P. et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17, 2359–2362 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang, L. et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and class labeling of gadolinium-based contrast agents by the Food and Drug Administration. Radiology 265, 248–253 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kanda, T., Ishii, K., Kawaguchi, H., Kitajima, K. & Takenaka, D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 270, 834–841 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kanda, T. et al. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulates in the brain even in subjects without severe renal dysfunction: evaluation of autopsy brain specimens with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Radiology 276, 228–232 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McDonald, R. J. et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275, 772–782 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kanal, E. & Tweedle, M. F. Residual or retained gadolinium: practical implications for radiologists and our patients. Radiology 275, 630–634 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Rogosnitzky, M. & Branch, S. Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms. Biometals 29, 365–376 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Port, M. et al. Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: a critical review. Biometals 21, 469–490 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Robert, P. et al. Linear gadolinium-based contrast agents are associated with brain gadolinium retention in healthy rats. Invest. Radiol. 51, 73 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Robert, P. et al. T1-Weighted hypersignal in the deep cerebellar nuclei after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents in healthy rats: difference between linear and macrocyclic agents. Invest. Radiol. 50, 473–480 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bussi, S. et al. Differences in gadolinium retention after repeated injections of macrocyclic MR contrast agents to rats. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25822 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Laurent, S., Elst, L. V. & Muller, R. N. Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 1, 128–137 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Caravan, P., Ellison, J. J., McMurry, T. J. & Lauffer, R. B. Gadolinium (III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem. Rev. 99, 2293–2352 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Caravan, P. Strategies for increasing the sensitivity of gadolinium based MRI contrast agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 512–523 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Aime, S., Botta, M., Fasano, M. & Terreno, E. Lanthanide (III) chelates for NMR biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 19–29 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wadas, T. J., Wong, E. H., Weisman, G. R. & Anderson, C. J. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for pet and spect imaging of disease. Chem. Rev. 110, 2858–2902 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Price, E. W. & Orvig, C. Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 260–290 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tsuboyama, S., Tsuboyama, K., Higashi, I. & Yanagita, M. Cyclic tetramers of optically active aziridines: 1, 4, 7, 10-tetrabenzyl-2, 5, 8, 11-tetra-(R)-ethyl-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane. Tetrahedron Lett. 11, 1367–1370 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ranganathan, R. S. et al. Polymethylated DOTA ligands. 1. synthesis of rigidified ligands and studies on the effects of alkyl substitution on acid− base properties and conformational mobility. Inorg. Chem. 41, 6846–6855 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Anelli, P. L. et al. Gd (III) complexes of poly (hydroxymethyl) substituted derivatives of 1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraacetic acid. Inorg. Chim. Acta 317, 218–229 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kamioka, S. et al. Chiral tetraazamacrocycles having four pendant-arms. Org. Lett. 11, 2289–2292 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tashiro, S., Ogura, Y., Tsuboyama, S., Tsuboyama, K. & Shionoya, M. Chiral recognition of α-Amino acids by an optically active (2 s, 5 s, 8 s, 11 s)-2, 5, 8, 11-tetraethyl cyclen Cobalt (III) complex. Inorg. Chem. 50, 4–6 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tircso, G., Webber, B. C., Kucera, B. E., Young, V. G. & Woods, M. Analysis of the conformational behavior and stability of the SAP and TSAP isomers of lanthanide (III) NB-DOTA-type chelates. Inorg. Chem. 50, 7966–7979 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aime, S. et al. Solution and solid-state characterization of highly rigid, eight-coordinate lanthanide (III) complexes of a macrocyclic tetrabenzylphosphinate. Inorg. Chem. 33, 4696–4706 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ranganathan, R. S. et al. Polymethylated DOTA ligands. 2. synthesis of rigidified lanthanide chelates and studies on the effect of alkyl substitution on conformational mobility and relaxivity. Inorg. Chem. 41, 6856–6866 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Payne, K. M. & Woods, M. Isomerism in benzyl-DOTA derived bifunctional chelators: implications for molecular imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 26, 338–344 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kumar, K., Sukumaran, K. & Tweedle, M. Determination of free gadolinium (3+) as a cyclohexanediaminetetraacetic acid complex by reversed-phase HPLC in ionic gadolinium (III) chelates. Anal. Chem. 66, 295–299 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dai, L., Lo, W.-S., Coates, I. D., Pal, R. & Law, G.-L. New class of bright and highly stable chiral cyclen europium complexes for circularly polarized luminescence applications. Inorg. Chem. 55, 9065–9070 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Webber, B. C., Cassino, C., Botta, M. & Woods, M. Aggregation in amphiphilic macrocycle-substituted Gd3+DOTA-type chelates is affected by the regiochemistry of substitution. Inorg. Chem. 54, 2085–2087 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Opina, A. C. L. et al. Analysis of the isomer ratios of polymethylated-DOTA complexes and the implications on protein structural studies. Dalton Trans. 45, 4673–4687 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Aime, S. & Caravan, P. Biodistribution of gadolinium‐based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30, 1259–1267 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Seale, M. K., Catalano, O. A., Saini, S., Hahn, P. F. & Sahani, D. V. Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29, 1725–1748 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gandhi, S. N., Brown, M. A., Wong, J. G., Aguirre, D. A. & Sirlin, C. B. MR contrast agents for liver imaging: what, when, how. Radiographics 26, 1621–1636 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tweedle, M. F., Wedeking, P. & Kumar, K. Biodistribution of radiolabeled, formulated gadopentetate, gadoteridol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide in mice and rats. Invest. Radiol. 30, 372–380 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Siriwardena-Mahanama, B. N. & Allen, M. J. Strategies for optimizing water-exchange rates of lanthanide-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Molecules 18, 9352–9381 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Aime, S. et al. NMR, relaxometric, and structural studies of the hydration and exchange dynamics of cationic lanthanide complexes of macrocyclic tetraamide ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 5762–5771 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sherry, A. D. & Wu, Y. The importance of water exchange rates in the design of responsive agents for MRI. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 17, 167–174 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Law, G.-L. et al. Circularly polarized luminescence of curium: a new characterization of the 5f actinide complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15545–15549 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Göbl, C. et al. Increasing the chemical-shift dispersion of unstructured proteins with a covalent lanthanide shift reagent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 14847–14851 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Müntener, T., Häussinger, D., Selenko, P. & Theillet, F.-X. In-cell protein structures from 2D NMR experiments. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 2821–2825 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Aime, S. et al. Properties, solution state behavior, and crystal structures of chelates of DOTMA. Inorg. Chem. 50, 7955–7965 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Woods, M., Kovacs, Z., Zhang, S. & Sherry, A. D. Towards the rational design of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: isolation of the two coordination isomers of lanthanide DOTA‐type complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 5889–5892 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Avedano, S. et al. Coupling fast water exchange to slow molecular tumbling in Gd3+Chelates: why faster is not always better. Inorg. Chem. 52, 8436–8450 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Caravan, P., Farrar, C. T., Frullano, L. & Uppal, R. Influence of molecular parameters and increasing magnetic field strength on relaxivity of gadolinium- and manganese-based T1 contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 4, 89–100 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dumas, S. et al. High relaxivity MRI contrast agents part 1: Impact of single donor atom substitution on relaxivity of serum albumin-bound gadolinium complexes. Invest Radiol. 45, 600 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Boros, E., Karimi, S., Kenton, N., Helm, L. & Caravan, P. Gd (DOTAlaP): exploring the boundaries of fast water exchange in gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. Inorg. Chem. 53, 6985–6994 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Doble, D. M. et al. Optimization of the relaxivity of MRI contrast agents: effect of poly (ethylene glycol) chains on the water-exchange rates of GdIII complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 10758–10759 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Caravan, P. et al. The interaction of MS-325 with human serum albumin and its effect on proton relaxation rates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 3152–3162 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Synergistic effect of human serum albumin and fullerene on Gd-DO3A for tumor-targeting imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11246–11254 (2016)..

  52. 52.

    Zhang, Z. et al. Multilocus binding increases the relaxivity of protein‐bound MRI contrast agents. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 6766–6769 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Nair, S. A. et al. Monovalent and bivalent fibrin‐specific MRI contrast agents for detection of thrombus. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4918–4921 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zhang, Z., Kolodziej, A. F., Greenfield, M. T. & Caravan, P. Heteroditopic binding of magnetic resonance contrast agents for increased relaxivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 2621–2624 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rodríguez-Rodríguez, A. et al. Lanthanide(III) Complexes with a reinforced cyclam ligand show unprecedented kinetic inertness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17954–17957 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gale, E. M., Zhu, J. & Caravan, P. Direct measurement of the mn (II) Hydration state in metal complexes and metalloproteins through 17O NMR line widths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18600–18608 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Powell, D. H. et al. Structural and dynamic parameters obtained from 17O NMR, EPR, and NMRD studies of monomeric and dimeric Gd3+Complexes of interest in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: an integrated and theoretically self-consistent approach1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9333–9346 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Caravan, P. et al. Albumin binding, relaxivity, and water exchange kinetics of the diastereoisomers of MS-325, a Gadolinium(III)-Based Magnetic Resonance Angiography Contrast Agent. Inorg. Chem. 46, 6632–6639 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Powell, D. H. et al. Structural and dynamic parameters obtained from 17O NMR, EPR, and NMRD studies of monomeric and dimeric Gd3+complexes of interest in magnetic resonance imaging: an integrated and theoretically self-consistent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 9333–9346 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Woods, M. et al. Solution dynamics and stability of lanthanide (III)(S)-2-(p-nitrobenzyl) DOTA complexes. Inorg. Chem. 43, 2845–2851 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (4BCC8), the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (GLL-PolyU 253002/14 P), (Collaborative Research Grants, CRF PolyU11/CRF/13E), the University Research Facility for Chemical and Environmental Analysis (UCEA), Area of Excellence Grants (1-ZVGG), the United States Department of Energy, DE-SC0008833 (to support TP and XL) and the National Institutes of Health (R01EB009062, S10OD010650 to PC).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G. -L. L. conceived and supervised the project and carried out data analysis. L. D. carried out all synthetic and NMR experiments and data analysis. E. M. G. and C. M. J. performed the experiments and data analysis for water exchange rate and relaxivity determination. N. J. R. performed the in vivo MRI studies and data analysis. P. C. supervised water exchange rate, relaxivity and MRI experiments and oversaw data analysis. W. T. K. C. performed the crystallographic acquisition. W. C.-S. T. performed the experiments for the ex vivo biodistribution and ICP-MS analysis. T. A. P. and X. L. performed the radiometal labelling. C. J. A. supervised the radiolabeling studies and data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carolyn J. Anderson or Peter Caravan or Ga-Lai Law.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, L., Jones, C.M., Chan, W.T.K. et al. Chiral DOTA chelators as an improved platform for biomedical imaging and therapy applications. Nat Commun 9, 857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03315-8

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing