Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Precipitation of binary quasicrystals along dislocations

Abstract

Dislocations in crystals naturally break the symmetry of the bulk, introducing local atomic configurations with symmetries such as fivefold rings. But dislocations do not usually nucleate aperiodic structure along their length. Here we demonstrate the formation of extended binary quasicrystalline precipitates with Penrose-like random-tiling structures, beginning with chemical ordering within the pentagonal structure at cores of prismatic dislocations in Mg–Zn alloys. Atomic resolution observations indicate that icosahedral chains centered along [0001] pillars of Zn interstitial atoms are formed templated by the fivefold rings at dislocation cores. They subsequently form columns of rhombic and elongated hexagonal tiles parallel to the dislocation lines. Quasicrystalline precipitates are formed by random tiling of these rhombic and hexagonal tiles. Such precipitation may impact dislocation glide and alloy strength.

Introduction

Dislocations are linear defects that break the local symmetry of bulk crystal lattices. They carry atomic shear steps during plastic deformation of crystals and thereby enable the formability of crystalline materials1. Importantly, dislocations in crystalline materials can also facilitate heterogeneous precipitation, prior to homogeneous precipitation in the perfect matrix2,3,4,5,6,7. Structure of the precipitates is determined by chemical composition of the materials, transformation temperatures, and holding time, according to the Gibbs isotherm8. Precipitates at dislocations have been found with crystal structures the same as those within regions away from dislocations in various crystalline materials since the 1950s2,3,4,5,6,9. It seems that localized occurrence of forbidden symmetries at dislocation cores has had little impact on precipitate structures.

But interestingly, icosahedral clusters consisting of a small amount of atoms which show fivefold rotations have low free energy, and can exist in liquid metals10,11,12. And quasicrystals can form based on icosahedral clusters present in undercooled liquid during solidification13,14,15,16,17,18. It is also known that fivefold rings of atoms may be produced at dislocation cores in crystals1,19. This knowledge about quasicrystals and dislocations1,13,14,15,16,17,18,20 implies that dislocations in crystals might serve as nucleation sites for icosahedral clusters. However, it has been unclear whether icosahedral clusters form and interact with the broken symmetry along dislocations in crystalline materials at the earliest stage of precipitation2,3,4,5.

Here, we report precipitation of quasicrystals showing Penrose-like random-tiling structures along dislocations in Mg–Zn alloys, based on atomic resolution high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) investigations. We believe this to be the first case of a binary quasicrystalline phase formed by dislocation-assisted precipitation since the solidified Cd-Yb and Cd-Ca alloys were first reported in 200021,22.

Results

Zn segregation and atomic structure of dislocation cores

Figure 1a shows a high-resolution HAADF-STEM image recorded along $$[0001]_{\mathrm{Mg}}$$ from a region with brighter intensity peaks owing to Zn segregation, which is observed in cold-rolled samples after annealing at 573 K for ~ 5 min. Those brighter spots are distributed along a prismatic edge dislocation with a Burgers vector of 〈a〉 = $$1/3\langle 11\bar 20\rangle$$, according to the closure failure of the Burgers circuit. Furthermore, the four atomic columns enriched with Zn indicated by circles are quite close to octahedral interstices near the dislocation core region, and their intensity is about twice those indicated by squares (Fig. 1b).

Careful analysis shows that there are 10 atomic columns around some of the octahedral Zn atomic columns, forming icosahedral chains10,23, as shown in Fig. 1c. These icosahedral chains are still under-developed chemically and structurally, compared with those in the MgZn2 Laves phase. Juxtaposed packing of icosahedral chains commonly exists in Frank–Kasper intermetallic compounds, such as Laves and μ phases24,25. The spacing between neighboring octahedral Zn columns is ~ 4.54 ± 0.04 Å (Fig. 1a), matching well the distance of 4.53 Å between neighboring icosahedral chains in MgZn2 C14 Laves phase (one stable crystal with lattice parameters, a = 5.233 Å, c = 8.566 Å). Because the observed Zn segregation along the dislocation shown in Fig. 1a does not form complete unit cells of the C14 Laves phase yet, we refer to it as a Cottrell atmosphere with partial ordering, rather than a precipitate. Zn segregation and partial ordering modify the dislocation core structure (Supplementary Fig. 1), and introduce additional lattice distortion around the dislocation as revealed by geometrical phase analysis26 (Fig. 1d, e).

Tiny precipitates at dislocation cores

Figure 2 shows a high-resolution HAADF-STEM image for an edge 〈a〉 dislocation associated with more icosahedral chains, present commonly in cold-rolled samples after annealing at 573 K, and samples processed by friction stir processing. Interestingly, further segregation of Zn atoms did not bring about a C14 Laves MgZn2 precipitate, although unit-cell-scale slabs can be identified, as indicated by zigzag-stacked dotted rhombic tiles. Four icosahedral chains may also form a rectangular tile. One rhombus and a rectangle form a sub-unit of one μ unit-cell25. One μ rectangular tile and two icosahedral chains outside the longer sides of the rectangle together form an elongated hexagonal tile. Therefore, this precipitate is composed of rhombic and elongated hexagonal tiles. In addition, icosahedral chains with a higher level of Zn segregation exist at the region indicated by a yellow circle in Fig. 2. This kind of high segregation along dislocations was occasionally observed alone (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Large quasicrystalline precipitates at dislocation cores

Figure 3a shows a larger precipitate with an even more complex structure associated with an 〈a〉 dislocation. Besides unit-cell-scale slabs of C14 Laves and μ phases, tiny domains showing C15 Laves, Mg4Zn7 and K7Cs6 structures coexist in this precipitate, leading to five different orientations of both tiles. Interestingly, the five rhombuses outlined by blue lines form a domain showing fivefold symmetry. Peripheral atoms of this icosahedral chain are arranged with equal separation on a regular pentagon. And there are five, rather than four Zn columns surrounding the central Zn column of this icosahedral chain. Therefore, this icosahedral chain is chemically ordered along the fivefold axis, as shown in Fig. 3c. Icosahedral chains with Zn pentagons appear randomly in this precipitate, as seen in Fig. 3a. Furthermore, elongated hexagonal tiles are also distributed randomly with five different orientations numbered 1 to 5 in Fig. 3a. This arrangement of rhombic and elongated hexagonal tiles is similar to Penrose-like (Supplementary Fig. 3) random tiling in quasicrystals13,14,23,27. Interestingly, the Penrose-like random-tiling structure could be retained with further growth of precipitates by annealing at 613 K for 60 min (Fig. 3d). Five elongated hexagonal tiles may form a domain with a chemically ordered icosahedral chain (Fig. 3c) and showing fivefold symmetry, as highlighted in red in the bottom-right inset in Fig. 3d. In addition, there is a high density of chemically ordered icosahedral chains being shared by different arrangements of rhombic and elongated hexagonal tiles (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5) in the precipitate shown in Fig. 3d. The upper-right inset in Fig. 3d is a Fourier diffractogram showing 10 reflections distributing on a ring, as indicated by arrows. This is to say that quasicrystalline precipitates with Penrose-like random-tiling structure (Fig. 3), instead of crystals with translational ordering, are obtained finally, starting from Zn segregation and the formation of icosahedral clusters at dislocations (Figs. 1 and 2). The structural stability of quasicrystalline precipitates should be associated with the higher entropy of Penrose-like random-tiling structures27,28,29,30,31,32, compared with periodic packing of icosahedral chains in a Bravais lattice.

Figure 3e shows an atomic resolution Z-contrast image recorded along the $$\langle 11\bar 20\rangle _{\mathrm{Mg}}$$ direction for a small precipitate, demonstrating preferential growth of quasicrystals along the $$[0001]_{\mathrm{Mg}}$$ direction (Supplementary Fig. 6). There are many intensity spots at or close to octahedral interstitial sites, as indicated by yellow arrows in Fig. 3e. No translational symmetry or chemical ordering can be identified for the precipitate in planes normal to $$[0001]_{\mathrm{Mg}}$$, according to Fig. 3e. This is owing to the nature of Penrose-like random tiling of rhombic and elongated hexagonal tiles composed of icosahedral chains in the precipitate.

Simulation of the prismatic 〈a〉 dislocation in Mg

We performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations33 to obtain the atomic structure of prismatic dislocation cores in Mg, in order to find clues for understanding its role in the precipitation of Penrose-like random-tiling structures. Details of the simulations are given in the Methods. MD simulations show that there are basal pentagons (fivefold rings of atoms) at the core of prismatic 〈a〉 edge dislocations in Mg, as outlined in Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Fig. 7. Interestingly, those icosahedral chains we observe and the pentagonal chains at dislocations in Mg are in the same direction, with their fivefold axes parallel to the dislocation lines. Pentagons on adjacent basal planes are anti-symmetrical (Fig. 4b), if we neglect their difference in size and shape, which is similar to the case of an icosahedron (Fig. 3b). Furthermore, most interatomic distances of these pentagon Mg atoms along the prismatic 〈a〉 edge dislocation are close to those in icosahedral chains in Mg–Zn crystalline compounds (Supplementary Fig. 8), which may facilitate the formation of icosahedral domains at dislocations in Mg. This structural information provides a basis for understanding and modeling precipitation of random-tiling quasicrystals at the dislocation cores.

Formation of icosahedral chains along dislocations

When the local concentration of Zn atoms segregated at the dislocation reaches a sufficient level, structural transformation would occur through rearrangement of atoms7,8,34. An icosahedron would be formed, if three Zn atoms appeared between neighboring pentagons along [0001] direction, as shown by gray spheres in Fig. 4c. The middle Zn atom was originally at the center of the large pentagon and it moved downward by ~ 0.13 nm, as indicated by the red arrow. This hypothesis is consistent with atomic resolution observations of atoms between adjacent basal planes (Fig. 3e). The large basal pentagon would thus shrink slightly, leading to the formation of an icosahedron with distortion much smaller (Fig. 1) than that shown in Fig. 4c. Atoms in the columns at the center of pentagons at the dislocation core in Mg are out of basal planes (Supplementary Fig. 9), which would provide 50% of atoms to form a [0001] Zn pillar acting as the central atomic column of an icosahedral chain. An icosahedral chain can be formed by subsequent formation of icosahedra on top of each other by following the growing Zn pillar.

Once a tiny precipitate is formed, some Zn atoms arriving at the precipitate/Mg interfaces may occupy octahedral interstices34, producing [0001] Zn pillars, which can guide the formation and growth of icosahedral chains (Figs. 1a, 3e). Figure 4d shows examples for the packing of icosahedral chains to form unit-cell-scale units of C14, C15 Laves, μ phases and an elongated hexagon in Mg, without considering structural relaxation. Different tiles can be connected through sharing icosahedral chains in different orientations. The fivefold axis along the icosahedral chains makes it possible to connect neighboring tiles in five different orientations, which is responsible for the formation of Penrose-like random tiling (Figs. 24).

Discussion

The structural units of the Mg–Zn quasicrystals are simple icosahedra (13 atoms), so they are much smaller than those hierarchical multi-shell clusters, such as Bergman clusters (136 atoms) and Yb–Cd clusters (158 atoms) in other quasicrystals13,24,35. Local one-dimensional icosahedral ordering in the Mg lattice is energetically favorable, owing to the intrinsic low energy state of an icosahedral packing of atoms10. It is most likely that an icosahedral chain was first formed based on the pentagonal structure at the core of a prismatic $$1/3\langle 11\bar 20\rangle$$ dislocation (Figs. 1 and 4). This was followed by the formation of other adjacent icosahedral chains templated by the rule of Penrose-like random tiling, as shown in Figs. 13.

If all tiny domains/tiles showing Penrose-like random tiling (Figs. 2 and 3) were decreased to the (sub-)unit-cell scale of the corresponding Frank–Kasper phases, translational order would disappear, leading to the formation of quasicrystals13,36,37. Moreover, random-tiling domains in the precipitates are still not larger than unit cells of the corresponding crystalline phases after annealing at 613 K for 60 min (Fig. 3d). The excellent stability of random-tiling quasicrystals is attributed to the maximized entropy density28,29,31,32. The formation of quasicrystals along dislocations is in contrast to precipitation of C14 Laves MgZn2 crystals in grains without dislocations in undeformed Mg–Zn samples (Supplementary Fig. 10). Therefore, pentagonal chains at dislocations should play a critical role in precipitation of Penrose-like random-tiling structures in the Mg–Zn alloys38.

Tiny, dissimilar precipitates in a material matrix can act as obstacles to dislocation motion, having an important role in strengthening alloys. Vickers microhardness was increased from 65.8 ± 2.8 to 87.0 ± 4.4 upon the formation of quasicrystalline precipitates (Fig. 3d) in Mg–Zn alloys after annealing at 613 K for 60 min, which means a relative increase of ~ 32% in microhardness of the alloy. This relative increase (32%) in microhardness of the present Mg–Zn alloy is similar to that (29%) for a Mg–Zn-Gd alloy with high density $$\langle 0001\rangle$$ rod precipitates of crystalline β′-Mg7Gd, although the density and volume fraction of the quasicrystalline rods of Mg–Zn is lower than that of β′-Mg7Gd rods (Methods, Supplementary Figs. 6 and 11).

Our atomic resolution observations provide clear demonstration of Zn segregation along dislocations with a preference for one-dimensional icosahedral ordering. Formation of icosahedral chains is initially templated by the nucleation and growth of individual atomic pillars of Zn atoms occupying octahedral interstitial sites of the Mg matrix. Penrose-like random tiling of rhombic and hexagonal tiles composed of icosahedral chains leads to quasicrystalline precipitates. This work shows how quasicrystals can nucleate and grow from the broken symmetry of a dislocation core in crystals, shedding new light on fundamental understanding of both dislocations and quasicrystals. Our results may have implications for precipitation strengthening of solids using quasicrystals, as dislocations are important lattice defects in strained alloys.

Methods

Materials preparation

Two Mg–Zn alloys, Mg-5.0Zn, and Mg-9.0Zn (weight %), were prepared by induction melting of high purity Mg and Zn under argon atmosphere protection. The Zn concentrations of Mg-5.0Zn and Mg-9.0Zn alloys are quite similar to commercial ZK60 Mg alloys39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47 and Mg–Zn-RE (RE, rare earth elements) alloys48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56 with icosahedral quasicrystalline strengthening phase, respectively. Intermetallic compounds in Mg–Zn alloys include MgZn2, Mg4Zn7, Mg21Zn25, MgZn, Mg2Zn11, and Mg7Zn357. These binary Mg–Zn compounds are all crystalline materials, and none of them is a crystal approximant. No quasicrystals have been reported in Mg–Zn binary alloys prepared by solidification58,59. A Mg–Zn-Gd alloy with a Zn:Gd atomic ratio of ~ 1:2 was prepared as a control sample. As-cast Mg–Zn-Gd samples were first heated at 773 K for 10 h, followed by quenching into water. $$\langle 0001\rangle$$ rod precipitates of crystalline β′-Mg7Gd (Supplementary Fig. 11) were formed in the Mg matrix during hot compression at 573 K to a strain of ~ 20% with a strain rate of 2 × 10−4 s−1.

Materials processing

The Mg-5.0Zn alloy was cold rolled with a thickness reduction of ~ 10.0% with 3.0–4.0% each route. Cold-rolled Mg-5.0Zn samples were annealed at 573 K for different time ranging from 5 to 15 min, to obtain small precipitates. In addition, the Mg-9.0Zn alloy was processed by friction stir processing with a rotation speed of 1200 rounds per minute and a moving speed of 100 mm per minute, producing an engineering strain of ~ 2000%, which is much larger than that of cold rolling process60,61. Besides introducing high plastic strain in the processed region of the materials, friction stir processing usually results in an instantaneous temperature raise to above 473 K, which may activate dynamic precipitation. Therefore, small precipitates were observed in samples treated by friction stir processing. The high plastic strain and temperature raise can lead to dynamic precipitation during the friction stir processing. After friction stir processing, Mg-9.0Zn samples were annealed at 613 K for 60 min, to study the structural stability and growth of precipitates formed during the friction stir processing.

Microstructural characterization

HAADF-STEM observations were carried out on an aberration-corrected Nion UltraSTEM 100 microscope and a Titan 60-300 STEM microscope. The beam convergence half angle of the Nion microscope and Titan microscope is 30 and 25 mrad, respectively. The collection half angles of the HAADF detector of the Nion and Titan microscopes are, respectively, 86–200 mrad and 60–290 mrad; both settings are able to eliminate influence of strain contrast around defects effectively62,63. The HAADF detector collects electrons that pass close to the atomic nuclei and, thus, scatter with intensities that approach the Z2 (Z is the atomic number) dependence of Rutherford scattering, so local structural and chemical information can be obtained with atomic resolution by HAADF-STEM imaging62,63. The atomic number of Mg and Zn is 12 and 30, respectively. Therefore, it is possible to image a single Zn interstitial atom in Mg using HAADF-STEM technique34, which makes it a powerful way to investigate Zn segregation and tiny precipitates at dislocation cores. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy measurements were performed to obtain local compositions of precipitates and their surrounding regions. Some of the rods showed brightness variation along their length viewed along the $$\langle 11\bar 20\rangle$$ zone axis, see the ones indicated by circles in Supplementary Fig. 6a. This kind of phenomenon was owing to overlap of rods at different heights in the sample, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 12a and b. No solutes other than Zn were detected within the quasicrystalline precipitates formed along dislocations in the present Mg–Zn alloys, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 12c and d.

Microhardness measurements

Vickers microhardness tests were performed using an MVK-H300 microhardness tester equipped with a diamond pyramidal indentor. A load of 50 g was applied for 10 s for each measurement. At least six points were measured for each sample. The Vickers microhardness for Mg–Zn alloys before and after the precipitation of $$\langle 0001\rangle$$ rods with the Penrose-like random-tiling structure was measured to be 65.8 ± 2.8 to 87.0 ± 4.4, respectively, demonstrating a relative increase in microhardness of ~ 32% as a result of quasicrystalline precipitation. The Vickers microhardness of solution-treated Mg–Zn–Gd samples was 82.5 ± 3.7, whereas it was increased to 106.3 ± 6.3 after the precipitation of crystalline β′-Mg7Gd during hot compression. It should be pointed out that there is also work hardening in the Mg–Zn–Gd samples, as shown by the appearance of stacking faults with Suzuki segregation20 in the Mg grain (Supplementary Fig. 11). The relative increase (~ 29%) in microhardness of the Mg–Zn–Gd alloy is slightly smaller than that of the Mg–Zn alloys, although two kinds of strengthening structures are present, Mg7Gd precipitates and stacking faults with Suzuki segregation20, in the Mg–Zn–Gd alloy.

MD simulations

The freely available open-source code LAMMPS33, and EAM (embedded-atom method) potential developed by Sun et al.64 were used to simulate the dislocation core structure in Mg. The specified energy tolerance is set as 10−15. The dislocation core structure simulated by MD using this potential is basically consistent with the results obtained by first-principles calculations65. There are 80,000 atoms in the supercell, with size 25.5 × 27.6 × 2.6 nm along $$[11\bar 20]$$, $$[\bar 1100]$$ and [0001], respectively. The dislocation line is parallel to [0001]. A prismatic edge $$\langle \mathbf{a}\rangle$$ dislocation was generated by displacing all atoms according to the Volterra solution. Periodic boundary conditions were used along the dislocation line (i.e., the [0001] axis), whereas the boundaries along the other two axes ($$[11\bar 20]$$ and $$[\bar 1100]$$) were fixed in the MD simulations. MD simulations were performed at three temperatures, 0, 300, and 600 K, in order to check the stability of the prismatic $$\langle \mathbf{a}\rangle$$ dislocation core, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. Both the 300 and 600 K simulations were performed for 5 ns. It was found that the fivefold rings at the dislocation core could stay stable within the time-frame of the simulations at 600 K (Supplementary Fig. 13), although it is higher than the annealing temperature (573 K) required to promote precipitation in cold-rolled Mg–Zn alloys (Figs. 1, 2 and 3a).

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

1. 1.

Hirth, J. P. & Lothe, J. Theory of Dislocations. 2nd edn, (Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1982).

2. 2.

Barnett, D. M. Nucleation of coherent precipitates near edge dislocations. Scr. Metall. Mater. 5, 261 (1971).

3. 3.

Dollins, C. C. Nucleation on dislocations. Acta Metall. Mater. 18, 1209 (1970).

4. 4.

Feng, Z. Q. et al. Precipitation process along dislocations in Al-Cu-Mg alloy during artificial aging. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 706–714 (2010).

5. 5.

Allen, R. M. & Vandersande, J. B. High-resolution transmission electron-microscope study of early stage precipitation on dislocation lines in Al-Zn-Mg. Metall. Trans. A 9, 1251–1258 (1978).

6. 6.

Hutchinson, P. W. & Dobson, P. S. Preferential precipitation on dislocation loops in Te-doped gallium-arsenide. Philos. Mag. A 38, 15–23 (1978).

7. 7.

Kuzmina, M., Herbig, M., Ponge, D., Sandlobes, S. & Raabe, D. Linear complexions: confined chemical and structural states at dislocations. Science 349, 1080–1083 (2015).

8. 8.

Gibbs, J. W. The Collected Works of J. W. Gibbs. (Yale Univ. Press, CT, USA, 1961).

9. 9.

Kaiser, U., Muller, D. A., Grazul, J. L., Chuvilin, A. & Kawasaki, M. Direct observation of defect-mediated cluster nucleation. Nat. Mater. 1, 102–105 (2002).

10. 10.

Frank, F. C. Supercooling of liquids. Proc. R. Soc. Lon. Ser. -A 215, 43–46 (1952).

11. 11.

Hirata, A. et al. Geometric frustration of icosahedron in metallic glasses. Science 341, 376–379 (2013).

12. 12.

Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Icosahedral bond orientational order in supercooled liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1297–1300 (1981).

13. 13.

Abe, E., Yan, Y. F. & Pennycook, S. J. Quasicrystals as cluster aggregates. Nat. Mater. 3, 759–767 (2004).

14. 14.

Steinhardt, P. J. et al. Experimental verification of the quasi-unit-cell model of quasicrystal structure. Nature 396, 55–57 (1998).

15. 15.

Keys, A. S. & Glotzer, S. C. How do quasicrystals grow? Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 235503 (2007).

16. 16.

Kuczera, P. & Steurer, W. Cluster-based solidification and growth algorithm for decagonal quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 085502 (2015).

17. 17.

Jeong, H.-C. Growing perfect decagonal quasicrystals by local rules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 135501 (2007).

18. 18.

Achim, C. V., Schmiedeberg, M. & Loewen, H. Growth modes of quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 255501 (2014).

19. 19.

Yang, Z. Q. et al. Direct observation of atomic dynamics and silicon doping at a topological defect in graphene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8908–8912 (2014).

20. 20.

Yang, Z. Q., Chisholm, M. F., Duscher, G., Ma, X. L. & Pennycook, S. J. Direct observation of dislocation dissociation and Suzuki segregation in a Mg-Zn-Y alloy by aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. Acta Mater. 61, 350–359 (2013).

21. 21.

Guo, J. Q., Abe, E. & Tsai, A. P. Stable icosahedral quasicrystals in binary Cd-Ca and Cd-Yb systems. Phys. Rev. B 62, 14605–14608 (2000).

22. 22.

Tsai, A. P., Guo, J. Q., Abe, E., Takakura, H. & Sato, T. J. Alloys-a stable binary quasicrystal. Nature 408, 537–538 (2000).

23. 23.

Penrose, R. The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research. Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 10, 266–271 (1974).

24. 24.

Frank, F. C. & Kasper, J. S. Complex alloy structures regarded as sphere packings.1. Definitions and basic principles. Acta Crystallogr. 11, 184–190 (1958).

25. 25.

Kuo, K. H., Ye, H. Q. & Li, D. X. Tetrahedrally colse-packed phases in superalloys: new phases and domain structures observed by high-resolution electron microscopy. J. Mater. Sci. 21, 2597–2622 (1986).

26. 26.

Hӱtch, M. J., Snoeck, E. & Kilaas, R. Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs. Ultramicroscopy 74, 131–146 (1998).

27. 27.

Steinhardt, P. J. & Jeong, H. C. A simpler approach to Penrose tiling with implications for quasicrystal formation. Nature 382, 431–433 (1996).

28. 28.

Dotera, T., Oshiro, T. & Ziherl, P. Mosaic two-lengthscale quasicrystals. Nature 506, 208–211 (2014).

29. 29.

Blunt, M. O. et al. Random tiling and topological defects in a two-dimensional molecular network. Science 322, 1077–1081 (2008).

30. 30.

Strandburg, K. J. Random-tiling quasicrystal. Phys. Rev. B 40, 6071–6084 (1989).

31. 31.

Li, W. X., Park, H. & Widom, M. Phase-diagram of a random tiling quasi-crystal. J. Stat. Phys. 66, 1–69 (1992).

32. 32.

Haji-Akbari, A. et al. Disordered, quasicrystalline and crystalline phases of densely packed tetrahedra. Nature 462, 773–777 (2009). U791.

33. 33.

Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular-dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

34. 34.

Yang, Z. Q., Ma, S. Y., Hu, Q. M., Ye, H. Q. & Chisholm, M. F. Direct observation of solute interstitials and their clusters in Mg alloys. Mater. Charact. 128, 226–231 (2017).

35. 35.

Takakura, H., Gomez, C. P., Yamamoto, A., De Boissieu, M. & Tsai, A. P. Atomic structure of the binary icosahedral Yb-Cd quasicrystal. Nat. Mater. 6, 58–63 (2007).

36. 36.

Shechtman, D., Blech, I., Gratias, D. & Cahn, J. W. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951–1953 (1984).

37. 37.

Joseph, D. & Elser, V. A model of quasicrystal growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1066–1069 (1997).

38. 38.

Yan, Y. F. & Wang, R. H. The Burgers vector of an edge dislication in an Al70Co15Ni15 decagonal quasicrystal determined by means of convergent-beam electron-diffraction. J. Phys. Cond. Matter 5, L195–L200 (1993).

39. 39.

Dong, S. et al. Characteristic cyclic plastic deformation in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Int. J. Plast. 91, 25–47 (2017).

40. 40.

Karparvarfard, S. M. H., Shaha, S. K., Behravesh, S. B., Jahed, H. & Williams, B. W. Microstructure, texture and mechanical behavior characterization of hot forged cast ZK60 magnesium alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 33, 907–918 (2017).

41. 41.

Torbati-Sarraf, S. A., Sabbaghianrad, S., Figueiredo, R. B. & Langdon, T. G. Orientation imaging microscopy and microhardness in a ZK60 magnesium alloy processed by high-pressure torsion. J. Alloy. Compd. 712, 185–193 (2017).

42. 42.

Yang, Y., Wang, Z. & Jiang, L. Evolution of precipitates in ZK60 magnesium alloy during high strain rate deformation. J. Alloy. Compd. 705, 566–571 (2017).

43. 43.

Dumitru, F. D., Higuera-Cobos, O. F. & Cabrera, J. M. ZK60 alloy processed by ECAP: Microstructural, physical and mechanical characterization. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 594, 32–39 (2014).

44. 44.

Luo, Z. A., Xie, G. M., Ma, Z. Y., Wang, G. L. & Wang, G. D. Effect of yttrium addition on microstructural characteristics and superplastic behavior of friction stir processed ZK60 alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 29, 1116–1122 (2013).

45. 45.

Bhattacharjee, T. et al. High strength and formable Mg-6.2Zn-0.5Zr-0.2Ca alloy sheet processed by twin roll casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 609, 154–160 (2014).

46. 46.

Jung, K. H., Kim, Y. B., Lee, G. A., Zhang, Y.-Z. & Ahn, B. Effects of fabrication methods on deformability and microstructure of Mg-Zn-Zr wrought alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24, S68–S74 (2014).

47. 47.

Orlov, D. et al. Particle evolution in Mg-Zn-Zr alloy processed by integrated extrusion and equal channel angular pressing: Evaluation by electron microscopy and synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering. Acta Mater. 72, 110–124 (2014).

48. 48.

Yang, Z. Q., Liu, J. F. & Ye, H. Q. Quasicrystal and related phase transformations in Mg alloys. Mater. China 35, 345–355 (2016).

49. 49.

Kim, Y. K., Kim, W. T. & Kim, D. H. Quasicrystal-reinforced Mg alloys. Sci. Tech. Adv. Mater. 15, 024801 (2014).

50. 50.

Kwak, T. Y. & Kim, W. J. Superplastic behavior of an ultrafine-grained Mg-13Zn-1.55Y alloy with a high volume fraction of icosahedral phases prepared by high-ratio differential speed rolling. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 33, 919–925 (2017).

51. 51.

Liu, J. F., Yang, Z. Q. & Ye, H. Q. Solid-state formation of icosahedral quasicrystals at Zn3Mg3Y2/Mg interfaces in a Mg-Zn-Y alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 650, 65–69 (2015).

52. 52.

Liu, J. F., Yang, Z. Q. & Ye, H. Q. Direct observation of solid-state reversed transformation from crystals to quasicrystals in a Mg alloy. Sci. Rep. 5, 09816 (2015).

53. 53.

Liu, J. F., Yang, Z. Q. & Ye, H. Q. In situ transmission electron microscopy investigation of quasicrystal-crystal transformations in Mg-Zn-Y alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 621, 179–188 (2015).

54. 54.

Mihalkovic, M., Richmond-Decker, J., Henley, C. L. & Oxborrow, M. Ab-initio tiling and atomic structure for decagonal ZnMgY quasicrystal. Philos. Mag. 94, 1529–1541 (2014).

55. 55.

Ohhashi, S., Suzuki, K., Kato, A. & Tsai, A. P. Phase formation and stability of quasicrystal/alpha-Mg interfaces in the Mg-Cd-Yb system. Acta Mater. 68, 116–126 (2014).

56. 56.

Singh, A., Osawa, Y., Somekawa, H. & Mukai, T. Effect of microstructure on strength and ductility of high strength quasicrystal phase dispersed Mg-Zn-Y alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 611, 242–251 (2014).

57. 57.

Alloy phase diagram, in ASM Handbook Vol. 3 (ASM international, USA, 1992).

58. 58.

Rosalie, J. M., Somekawa, H., Singh, A. & Mukai, T. Structural relationships among MgZn2 and Mg4Zn7 phases and transition structures in Mg-Zn-Y alloys. Philos. Mag. 90, 3355–3374 (2010).

59. 59.

Gao, X. & Nie, J. F. Characterization of strengthening precipitate phases in a Mg-Zn alloy. Scr. Mater. 56, 645–648 (2007).

60. 60.

Nandan, R., DebRoy, T. & Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. Recent advances in friction-stir welding - Process, weldment structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 980–1023 (2008).

61. 61.

Mishra, R. S. & Ma, Z. Y. Friction stir welding and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. 50, 1–78 (2005).

62. 62.

Pennycook, S. J. Z-Contrast STEM for materials science. Ultramicroscopy 30, 58–69 (1989).

63. 63.

Pennycook, S. J. The impact of STEM aberration correction on materials science. Ultramicroscopy 180, 22–33 (2017).

64. 64.

Sun, D. Y. et al. Crystal-melt interfacial free energies in hcp metals: a molecular dynamics study of Mg. Phys. Rev. B 73, 024116 (2006).

65. 65.

Yasi, J. A. et al. Basal and prism dislocation cores in magnesium: comparison of first-principles and embedded-atom-potential methods predictions. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17, 055012 (2009).

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the NSF of China (51371178, 51390473, and 51771202); Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDY-SSW-JSC027); U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division; and the National University of Singapore. We thank Mr. W.W. Hu at IMR for assistance in preparation and characterization of the Mg–Zn-Gd alloy. Dr. H. Wang and S.Y. Ma at IMR are thanked for help in MD simulations.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

Z.Y. conceived the project, designed the experiments, and interpreted the results. Z.Y., M.F.C. and L.Z. performed HAADF-STEM experiments. L.Z. prepared the materials and measured the Vickers microhardness. X.Z. performed MD simulations under the supervision of Z.Y. Z.Y., M.F.C., H.Y. and S.J.P. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiqing Yang, Matthew F. Chisholm or Stephen J. Pennycook.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Yang, Z., Zhang, ., Chisholm, M.F. et al. Precipitation of binary quasicrystals along dislocations. Nat Commun 9, 809 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03250-8

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03250-8

• Binary icosahedral clusters of hard spheres in spherical confinement

• Da Wang
• Tonnishtha Dasgupta

Nature Physics (2021)

• Strategic control of atomic-scale defects for tuning properties in metals

• Suhas Eswarappa Prameela
• Peng Yi
• Timothy P. Weihs

Nature Reviews Physics (2021)