Loss of microRNA-128 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration

Huang, Wei; Feng, Yuliang; Liang, Jialiang; Yu, Hao; Wang, Cheng; Wang, Boyu; Wang, Mingyang; Jiang, Lin; Meng, Wei; Cai, Wenfeng; Medvedovic, Mario; Chen, Jenny; Paul, Christian; Davidson, W. Sean; Sadayappan, Sakthivel; Stambrook, Peter J.; Yu, Xi-Yong; Wang, Yigang

doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03019-z

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 16 February 2018

Loss of microRNA-128 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration

Wei Huang^1,2^na1,
Yuliang Feng¹^na1,
Jialiang Liang²^na1,
Hao Yu²,
Cheng Wang³,
Boyu Wang⁴,
Mingyang Wang⁵,
Lin Jiang²,
Wei Meng⁶,
Wenfeng Cai²,
Mario Medvedovic⁷,
Jenny Chen⁷,
Christian Paul²,
W. Sean Davidson²,
Sakthivel Sadayappan ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2006-7678⁸,
Peter J. Stambrook⁹,
Xi-Yong Yu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4988-7338¹ &
…
Yigang Wang²

Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 700 (2018) Cite this article

11k Accesses
106 Citations
9 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The goal of replenishing the cardiomyocyte (CM) population using regenerative therapies following myocardial infarction (MI) is hampered by the limited regeneration capacity of adult CMs, partially due to their withdrawal from the cell cycle. Here, we show that microRNA-128 (miR-128) is upregulated in CMs during the postnatal switch from proliferation to terminal differentiation. In neonatal mice, cardiac-specific overexpression of miR-128 impairs CM proliferation and cardiac function, while miR-128 deletion extends proliferation of postnatal CMs by enhancing expression of the chromatin modifier SUZ12, which suppresses p27 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) expression and activates the positive cell cycle regulators Cyclin E and CDK2. Furthermore, deletion of miR-128 promotes cell cycle re-entry of adult CMs, thereby reducing the levels of fibrosis, and attenuating cardiac dysfunction in response to MI. These results suggest that miR-128 serves as a critical regulator of endogenous CM proliferation, and might be a novel therapeutic target for heart repair.

A microRNA program regulates the balance between cardiomyocyte hyperplasia and hypertrophy and stimulates cardiac regeneration

Article Open access 10 August 2021

Andrea Raso, Ellen Dirkx, … Leon J. De Windt

LRP6 downregulation promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration

Article Open access 24 September 2020

Yahan Wu, Liping Zhou, … Yi-Han Chen

IGF2BP3 promotes adult myocardial regeneration by stabilizing MMP3 mRNA through interaction with m6A modification

Article Open access 15 May 2023

Simeng Li, Siman Shen, … Liangqing Zhang

Introduction

The adult human heart fails to replenish the massive loss of cardiomyocytes (CMs) caused by ischemia, which is the leading cause of death worldwide¹. Intensive research has recently focused on the development of regenerative therapies for ischemic heart disease. Current regenerative approaches are designed to repopulate lost CMs through transplantation of exogenous stem cells from various sources with committed cardiogenic potential^2,3,4. The inability to differentiate efficiently, poor cell survival, immaturity of differentiated CM, and arrhythmia have all hampered the application of stem cell-based therapy in clinical settings⁵. Alternatively, cell-free approaches (such as stimulation of endogenous CM proliferation) have emerged as an attractive option for promoting myocardial regeneration.

There has been a longstanding dogma that adult mammalian CMs are incapable of cell division. Recent studies, however, have shown that 1-day-old neonatal mouse can regenerate its heart through dedifferentiation and proliferation of pre-existing CMs^6,7, a phenomenon that is observed in lower vertebrates such as adult zebrafish and amphibians⁸. Unlike the adult zebrafish, the capacity of the neonatal mouse heart to regenerate is diminished as early as 1 week after birth and remains limited throughout adulthood. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain the varying capacities of different species to undergo cardiac regeneration. Recent compelling evidence showing that CMs have the potential to divide implies there is a latent regenerative potential when endogenous CMs are triggered to proliferate. The most exciting one is the finding of limited self-renewal of human adult CMs using measurements of carbon-14 (¹⁴C) content by accelerator mass spectrometry^9,10,11. The reactivation of CM proliferation, therefore, becomes even more appealing for the potential of heart regeneration. Whether, how and to what extent the endogenous proliferative ability of CMs is sufficient to restore adult heart function, however, remains largely unknown.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) constitute a class of small noncoding RNAs that bind to the 3′ (untranslated region) UTR of target mRNAs, resulting in the reduction of protein expression predominantly by destabilizing the target mRNAs and/or by inhibiting translation^12,13. The miRNAs play pivotal roles in many biological processes including apoptosis of CMs during MI¹⁴. However, the miRNAs that regulate CM proliferation during homeostasis and injury are not fully defined.

In this study, we first show that the expression of cardiac miR-128 is lower in neonates than in adults, and is reduced during neonatal heart regeneration. Furthermore, cardiac-specific overexpression of miR-128 in early postnatal mice suppresses CM proliferation and causes impaired cardiac function. Conversely, knockout of miR-128 reactivates CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration in the adult mice, in part through modulation of cell cycle-related genes by targeting Suz12 in the heart. Collectively, our results suggest that miR-128 functions as a critical regulator of endogenous cardiac proliferation and regeneration.

Results

MiR-128 increases during postnatal heart growth

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in mouse cardiac ventricles was performed on postnatal days 1, 7, and 28 (P1, P7, and P28) to identify potential miRNAs involved in the regulation of postnatal heart growth. MiR-128 was robustly upregulated in P7 hearts as compared to P1, which was further confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) array (Supplementary Fig. 1A). As previously reported¹⁵, miR-128 was predominantly expressed in brain tissue but was also expressed in the heart (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Its expression in adult myocardium was further confirmed by in situ hybridization (ISH) (Supplementary Fig. 1C). To investigate the role of miR-128 in cell cycle withdrawal during heart growth, mouse hearts were harvested and sectioned at P1, P7, and P28 (Fig. 1a). As neonates (P1) progress to adulthood (P28), CMs underwent a maturation process characterized by suppression of cell proliferation as evidenced by decreased numbers of Ki67⁺ CMs (Fig. 1a, b). In addition, cardiac mass increased from P1 to P28 primarily due to an increase in CM size rather than in number (Fig. 1c, d). Interestingly, we found that miR-128 expression was significantly increased during heart development (Fig. 1e). Furthermore, the level of miR-128 was found to be significantly elevated in P7 and P28 hearts compared with P1 hearts. In order to examine whether the postnatal upregulation of miR-128 occurs specifically in the CMs, we isolated CMs from P1 and P28 hearts, respectively, and found significantly higher expression of miR-128 in P28 CMs when compared with P1 CMs (Fig. 1f). Moreover, the expression of miR-128 in CMs was significantly higher than in non-CMs (e.g., cardiac fibroblasts, CFs) (Fig. 1g). These data indicate a potential role for miR-128 in regulating CM proliferation.

Overexpression of miR-128 impairs cardiac homeostasis

To specify the function of miR-128 in the heart, a mouse model was generated in which miR-128 expression was under control of the α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC) promoter that was under temporal regulation by doxycycline (Dox). This “Tet-off” transgenic mouse (α-MHC-tTA; miR-128^TetRE) was produced by crossing α-MHC-tTA mice with miR-128^TetRE mice (Supplementary Fig. 2A). In α-MHC-tTA; miR-128^TetRE mice, the TetRE portion of tTA can bind to the TetO sequences after Dox withdrawal, and subsequently induce the CM-specific overexpression of miR-128 (designated as miR-128^OE mice) in defined temporal windows (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2B). In general, induced transgene expression begins during the second week of Dox withdrawal due to the slow clearance of Dox from tissues^16,17,18. Withdrawal of Dox from miR-128^OE fetuses starting at embryonic day 6 (E6) resulted in significant induction of miR-128 in miR-128^OE hearts at the P1 neonatal stage as determined by qPCR (Fig. 2b). At P1, the explanted hearts from miR-128^OE mice were markedly enlarged (Fig. 2c) compared with hearts from miR-128^TetRE mice (Control mice, designated as Ctrl). The higher heart-to-body weight ratios (HW/BW) of miR-128^OE mice relative to Ctrl showed a progressive increase in heart mass (Fig. 2d). Morphologically, CM size was measured by staining with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), which showed that miR-128^OE CMs were significantly larger than Ctrl CMs (Fig. 2e, f), implying the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiac function analysis from miR-128^OE mice at P1 by echocardiography (Fig. 2g) showed a reduction of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS), parameters of cardiac contractile function, when compared with Ctrl mice. In contrast, Dox treatment did not induce cardiac dysfunction in Ctrl mice (Supplementary Fig. 2C).

To explore the cellular mechanisms underlying the observed hypertrophy, heart sections were immunostained to assess proliferation and apoptosis. The miR-128^OE hearts displayed diminished proliferation of CMs based on the reduced number of Ki67⁺ CMs compared with Ctrl (Fig. 2h, i). However, there was no significant increase in apoptotic CMs in miR-128^OE hearts when assessed by TUNEL staining (Supplementary Fig. 2D).

To study the role of miR-128 in heart development, miR-128^OE mice were mated in the absence of Dox (Supplementary Fig. 2E). Assessment of miR-128 level by qPCR confirmed its marked overexpression by E10.5 in the hearts of miR-128^OE mice (Supplementary Fig. 2F). These miR-128^OE mutant mice displayed enlarged heart chambers, myocardial fibrosis, CM hypertrophy, and impaired LV systolic heart function at P28 (Supplementary Fig. 2G–I). Moreover, KEGG pathway analysis showed that oxidative phosphorylation, metabolism, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and dilated cardiomyopathy pathways were enriched in miR-128^OE hearts. Concomitantly, cell cycle and DNA replication pathways were suppressed in miR-128^OE hearts (Supplementary Fig. 3). Taken together, these data indicate that CM-specific overexpression of miR-128 induces early CM cell cycle exit, compensatory pathological growth of CM (hypertrophy), and impaired cardiac homeostasis.

Deletion of miR-128 stimulates postnatal CM proliferation

Having established a correlation between miR-128 overexpression and inhibition of CM proliferation, we asked whether loss of miR-128 is causal for CM proliferation. In vitro when miR-128 was knocked down using a specific miR-128 inhibitor (designated as Anti-miR-128) (Supplementary Fig. 4A), the neonatal CMs became dedifferentiated after 7 days. Loss of the CM differentiated state was based on sarcomere disassembly⁴ assessed by immunostaining for cardiac troponin T (cTnT), a marker for sarcomere integrity (Supplementary Fig. 4B–C). Consistent with sarcomere disassembly, expression of sarcomere genes (Tnnt2 and Myh6) was reduced (Supplementary Fig. 4D). While promoting loss of differentiation, silencing of miR-128, did not induce apoptosis in these cells (Supplementary Fig. 4E).

The effect of miR-128 knockdown on CM proliferation was then examined using phosphorylated histone 3 (pH3, a marker of mitosis) and Aurora B kinase (a marker of cytokinesis). In addition to inducing dedifferentiation, silencing of miR-128 (anti-miR-128 CMs) increased the number of mitotic CMs compared with control CMs (Ctrl) as determined by immunostaining for pH3 (Supplementary Fig. 4F). Expression of Aurora B kinase was markedly elevated in Anti-miR-128 CMs (Supplementary Fig. 4G). We also found a significant increase in the number of 5-ethynyl-2´-deoxyuridine (EdU) positive CMs in the Anti-miR-128 group indicative of elevated DNA replication (Supplementary Fig. 4H). Importantly, an increased level of GATA4 (a marker for dedifferentiated CMs⁸), was observed in Anti-miR-128 CMs (Supplementary Fig. 4I).

Given the evidence that silencing of miR-128 induces CM proliferation in vitro, we next preceded to determine the effects that deletion of miR-128 would have on CM proliferation in vivo. Cardiac-specific conditional miR-128 knockout mice were generated by crossing miR-128^flox/flox (miR-128^fl/fl) mice (Supplementary Fig. 5A) with Nkx2.5^Cre mice, resulting in cardiac-specific deletion of miR-128 during cardiogenesis (Nkx2.5^Cre; miR-128^fl/fl mice, designated as miR-128^−/−) (Supplementary Fig. 5B). Hearts from miR-128^fl/fl (Control mice, Ctrl) and miR-128^−/− mice were harvested and analyzed at P7, at the time when most CMs have exited the cell cycle and become post-mitotic^6,7. Downregulation of miR-128 in hearts from miR-128^−/− mice was confirmed by qPCR (Fig. 3a, b). By E10.5, miR-128^−/− hearts exhibited marked downregulation of miR-128. Phenotypic characterization of miR-128^−/− mice at P7 demonstrated that heart size (Fig. 3c) and heart function by echocardiography (Fig. 3d) were unaffected by miR-128 deletion. Although the heart weight-to-body weight ratio (HB/WB) of miR-128^−/− and Ctrl mice at P7 was similar (Fig. 3e), the CMs in miR-128^−/− hearts were smaller (Fig. 3f). This could indicate an increased number of CMs in these hearts due to persistent proliferation resulting from miR-128 deletion. To test this proposition, CMs were stained with Ki67 to assess the number of cycling cells. The results showed that loss of miR-128 resulted in a striking increase in CM proliferation (Fig. 3g, h). Sarcomere disassembly, a characteristic of CM dedifferentiation and proliferation, was also prominent in miR-128^−/− hearts compared with the Ctrl hearts (Fig. 3g, i, and j). In addition to the CMs with disassembled sarcomeres, there was a significantly higher number of Ki67-positive cells in the miR-128^−/− hearts, and with no obvious CM apoptosis in the miR-128^−/− hearts (Fig. 3k). By EdU incorporation assay (Fig. 3l–o), we also found a significant increase in the number of EdU⁺ CMs in miR-128^−/− hearts compared with Ctrl at P14 (Fig. 3l, m) as well as at P21 (Fig. 3n, o). Nevertheless, these mice developed normally to adulthood and did not exhibit any cardiac dysfunctions (Supplementary Fig. 6A, B). These data suggest that tissue-specific deletion of miR-128 deletion is sufficient to extend the postnatal CM proliferation window.

MiR-128 deletion reconfigures cell cycle gene expression

RNA-seq was performed on control (Ctrl) and miR-128^OE hearts (P7) to identify the putative target genes of miR-128 responsible for cell cycle regulation. By comparing the downregulated mRNAs identified in miR-128^OE hearts relative to Ctrl hearts with all possible predicted candidate miR-128 target genes¹⁹, we found 87 genes that contained the predicted binding site at the 3′UTR (Supplementary Fig. 7A). Gene Ontology (GO) PANTHER Analysis was then performed to identify the affected cellular biological processes. The leading biological category was ‘‘cellular process’’ category, with nearly 28.7% of all associated genes (GO: 0009987, Supplementary Fig. 7B). A further subgroup analysis of the ‘‘cellular process’’ indicated the potential for miR-128 to affect multiple pathways that are related to regulation of the cell cycle, cell communication, and cellular component movement (Supplementary Fig. 7B). Moreover, the analysis of genes downregulated in miR-128^OE showed statistically significant enrichment of genes downregulated after small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibition of components of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), Suz12 in particular (Supplementary Fig. 7C). PRC2 is a chromatin modifier complex that is crucial for organogenesis²⁰. Perturbation of the epigenetic landscape by ablation of PRC2 subunits during early cardiac development inhibits CM proliferation, and eventually leads to fatal cardiac malformations²¹. Computational analysis showed that Suz12 was a predicted target gene of miR-128 (Fig. 4a). In contrast to neonatal hearts, the protein levels of SUZ12 were lower in the adult heart (where the CM proliferation ability is quite limited) (Fig. 4b, c), paralleling the upregulation of miR-128. These data suggest that miR-128 may regulate CM proliferation via its intercation with Suz12 .

To investigate whether miR-128 regulates Suz12 expression, mouse neonatal CMs were transfected with a negative control (Ctrl), a mimic of miR-128 (miR-128), or an inhibitor of miR-128 (Anti-miR-128) and assessed for the level of SUZ12 by western blot analysis. Overexpression of miR-128 significantly reduced the protein level of SUZ12, whereas inhibition of miR-128 led to its increased expression (Fig. 4d, e). To further test whether miR-128 regulates Suz12 expression, we constructed a vector containing luciferase reporter with a DNA sequence encoding the complete 3′UTR from mouse Suz12 (designated as WT), and a mutated vector (designated as Mut) containing mismatches in the predicted miR-128-binding site in the 3′UTR (Fig. 4f). Co-transfection of HEK293T cells with the Suz12 3′UTR plasmid (WT) and miR-128 mimic resulted in a significant decrease in luciferase activity compared with cells co-transfected with the negative control or the mutated 3′UTR target sequence (Mut), indicating that Suz12 is a direct target of miR-128, consistent with a previous report²².

To better define how the interaction between miR-128 and Suz12 might mediate cell proliferation in vivo, we first analyzed the expression of cell cycle-related genes in miR-128^−/− hearts at P7 and found that expression of SUZ12, cyclin E and cyclin-dependent Kinase 2 (CDK2) was elevated in miR-128^−/− P7 hearts compared with hearts from control mice (Ctrl) while the CDK inhibitor (CDKi) p27 was downregulated (Fig. 4g, h). As SUZ12 can modulates the functionality of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), which catalyzes the formation of H3K27me3 (a transcriptional repressive mark)²³, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR assay and found that SUZ12, EZH2, and H3K27me3 were significantly enriched on the p27 promoter in miR-128^−/− hearts as compared to Ctrl (Fig. 4i). These data indicate that the downregulation of p27 induced by miR-128 deletion is attributed, at least in part, to PRC2 mediated gene silencing.

To investigate whether regulation of Suz12 signaling after miR-128 deletion is responsible for the enhanced proliferation in CMs, loss of function study was performed using siRNA against Suz12. In vitro, direct inhibition of Suz12 by siRNA (si-Suz12) in cultured miR-128^−/− neonatal CMs reversed the pro-proliferative effect conferred by miR-128 deletion (miR-128^−/−), as evidenced by a significant decrease in the number of Ki67⁺ CMs in the si-Suz12 group in contrast to control group (si-Ctrl) (Fig. 5a–c). To further validate that the Suz12-pathway is a major functional mediator of miR-128 effects, we injected miR-128^−/− mice (intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection) with si-Suz12 or si-Ctrl at P1, P3, P5, and harvested the hearts at P7 (Fig. 5d). Knockdown of Suz12 in vivo significantly induced CM hypertrophy (Fig. 5e) and impaired CM proliferation by decreasing the number of EdU⁺ CMs (Fig. 5f). Moreover, there was a significant increase in the level of p27 and decrease of Cyclin E and CDK2 expression in the si-Suz12 group when compared with si-Ctrl treated hearts (Fig. 5g, h). These data indicate that miR-128 deletion stimulates proliferation of CMs, in part through epigenetic modulation of cell cycle-related genes via targeting of Suz12 (Fig. 5i).

Overexpression of miR-128 inhibits cardiac regeneration

An apex resection (AR) model in neonatal mice at P1 (Supplementary Fig. 8A) was developed to enable assessment of temporal gene expression during cardiac regeneration. Histological analysis verified that by day 7 post AR, the initial large blood clot in the apex had been replaced by newly formed CMs and limited fibrotic tissue (Supplementary Fig. 8B). Also at day 7 post AR, genes associated with cell proliferation were significantly activated, whereas miR-128 expression was significantly diminished (Supplementary Fig. 8C, D). These data imply that expression level of miR-128 is associated with neonatal heart regeneration.

A miR-128^OE mouse model in which miR-128 was overexpressed in a CM-specific and temporally controlled (by Dox withdrawal) manner (Fig. 6a) was used to test whether miR-128 regulates cardiac regenerative capacity in neonatal mice. The miR-128^OE mice and control miR-128^TetRE mice (Ctrl) were subjected to AR at P1, and hearts from both groups were examined histologically. At 21 days post AR, the miR-128^OE hearts showed left ventricle dilation and defective regeneration compared with Ctrl groups (Fig. 6b). The miR-128^OE hearts showed fewer proliferating CMs, as quantified by the decreased number of EdU⁺ CMs in the injured apex and border area (Fig. 6c, d), and a greater extent of CM hypertrophy (Fig. 6e). In addition, systolic function was significantly impaired in the miR-128^OE group relative to Ctrl group (Fig. 6f, g). These findings suggest that inhibition of CM proliferation by miR-128 overexpression can impair cardiac regeneration in a neonatal mouse model.

Deletion of miR-128 promotes adult cardiac regeneration

To investigate whether loss of miR-128 in the adult is capable of promoting CM proliferation, cardiac-specific, tamoxifen (TAM) inducible miR-128 knockout mice were then generated by crossing α-MHC^MerCreMer mice with miR-128^fl/fl mice (Fig. 7a). TAM was administered at P21 to induce the miR-128 knockout at the adult stage. The adult miR-128 deleted mice were designated iKO, and the knockout was validated by qPCR. The heart weight-to-body ratio (HB/WB) was unchanged in iKO mice. Staining with WAG, however, showed that the size of the iKO CMs was smaller than the control CMs (Fig. 7b–d), suggesting that loss of miR-128 in the adult heart increases the number of CMs. This increase in CM number following miR-128 deletion was further confirmed by analysis of EdU incorporation into CMs (Fig. 7e). Furthermore, the total number of adult CMs and percentage of mono-nucleated CMs was significantly increased in iKO hearts 2 weeks after TAM-induced miR-128 deletion (Fig. 7f, g).

To determine whether cells in the myocardial lineage dedifferentiate following deletion of miR-128, a TAM inducible dual-lineage tracing system was generated by crossing α-MHC^MerCreMer mice with miR-128^fl/fl mice followed by crossing with Rosa26-tdTomato reporter mice to produce α-MHC^MerCreMer; miR-128^fl/+; R26R-tdTomato mice (designated as iKO-tdTomato) (Fig. 7h). In these transgenic mice, the pre-existing CMs with miR-128 knockout were labeled red (tdTomato, red fluorescence) following TAM administration. After TAM-induced miR-128 deletion (Fig. 7i), the α-MHC myocardial lineage-positive CMs in iKO-tdTomato mouse displayed a disorganized sarcomere structure and reduced sarcomere-related gene expression compared with control mice (α-MHC^MerCreMer; R26R-tdTomato, designated as Ctrl-tdTomato) (Fig. 7j, k). There was no observable apoptosis in hearts from iKO-tdTomato mice (Supplementary Fig. 9A, B). There was, however, increased expression of genes associated with cell proliferation (Nuspa1, Racgap1 and Myh10) and fetal genes associated with negative regulation of CM differentiation (Nppa and Nppb) in iKO-tdTomato hearts detected by qPCR (Fig. 7k). Importantly, in iKO mice, cardiac morphology remained unchanged and heart functions were normal (Supplementary Fig. 9C, D). These results indicate that deletion of miR-128 in the adult heart results in dedifferentiation and cell cycle re-entry of CMs, but has no impact on heart function.

To determine whether induction of cardiac proliferation following miR-128 deletion in adult mice is sufficient to allow adult heart repair following MI, adult iKO mice were subjected to permanent ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. One day after MI, we administered TAM to delete miR-128 in CMs (Fig. 8a). Analysis of iKO hearts at day 7 after TAM injection showed that the expression of miR-128 target SUZ12 was significantly increased, accompanied by downregulation of the p27 and upregulation of Cyclin E and CDK2 (Fig. 8b). Moreover, we observed a significant increase in the number of Aurora B-positive CMs (Fig. 8c), and in EdU positive CMs in the iKO hearts (Fig. 8d, e). These changes were associated with reduced cardiac fibrosis in the iKO hearts (Supplementary Fig. 10B). In addition, analysis of sarcomere structures in iKO hearts revealed robust dedifferentiated cardiac muscle in border areas and remote areas (Fig. 8d). Although it was previously reported that miR-128 regulates apoptosis by targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (Pparg)²⁴, we found no significant differences in either PPARγ expression or apoptosis in iKO hearts when compared to Ctrl hearts at day 7 after TAM injection (Supplementary Fig. 10C, D).

In addition to dedifferentiation and enhanced proliferation, iKO hearts showed significantly less fibrosis as compared to Ctrl groups 4 weeks after MI (Fig. 9a, b). Similarly, diminished cardiac function was significantly reversed in iKO mice, as evidenced by increased EF and FS after MI when compared with the Ctrl animals (Fig. 9c, d). Cardiac remodeling was also significantly reversed in iKO mice with reduced LVDd and LVDs (Fig. 9d). Collectively, these data indicate that inhibition of miR-128 promotes CM proliferation and improves endogenous cardiac regeneration after MI (Fig. 10).

Discussion

The application of direct activation of pre-existing CM proliferation is emerging as one of the most promising strategies in cardiac regenerative medicine^5,25,26. Dissecting the mechanisms by which adult CMs exit the cell cycle arrest is fundamental for therapeutic manipulation to stimulate endogenous CM proliferation in the adult myocardium. Although several CM cell cycle mediators have been identified^5,25, manipulation of these genes is insufficient for full recovery of heart function in response to injury. It is, therefore, essential to discover novel therapeutic targets that activate endogenous CM proliferation and recovery of cardiac function after damage.

Involvement of miRNAs has been invoked as one mechanism underlying regulation of cell proliferation. In this report, we propose a model in which inhibition of miR-128 in vivo promotes cardiac regeneration by activating CM proliferation. We demonstrate that (1) The upregulation of miR-128 in heart tissue is associated with the cell cycle exit of CMs during postnatal growth. (2) Cardiac-specific overexpression of miR-128 leads to premature cell cycle arrest and cardiac hypertrophy. (3) miR-128 regulates several cell cycle-related genes such as p27 by targeting Suz12. (4) Overexpression of miR-128 inhibits CM proliferation and neonatal heart regeneration. (5) Inhibition of miR-128 prolongs the postnatal CM proliferation window and enhances the cardiac regenerative capacity of adult heart.

As a neuronal-enriched miRNA^15,27, miR-128 is associated with central nervous system development^28,29 and is downregulated in gliomas³⁰. Downregulation of miR-128 accelerates glioma-initiating neural stem cell proliferation and contributes to the development of gliomas³¹. Recent research has demonstrated the involvement of miR-128 in cardiac repair of lower vertebrates such as the newt³² and showed that miR-128 inhibitors enhanced the proliferation (hyperplasia) of non-CMs and extracellular matrix deposition but had no effect on CMs, which was contrary to our current finding in mice. The discrepancy is potentially due to the use of different animal models with complex heart cell phenotypes. However, these findings bring important information into the translational study of mammals. In our study, miR-128 was revealed for the first time to be a negative regulator of the CM cell cycle when using a cardiac lineage-restricted transgenic mouse model. Deletion of miR-128 prolonged the postnatal CM proliferation window, as evidenced by pronounced sarcomere disassembly and proliferative markers including pH3, Ki67, Aurora B, and EdU. Normal growth of developing heart requires a proper balance between cycling cells and cells that exit the cycle. Disturbance in this balance is associated with hypertrophy^33,34,35 that is defined as cell enlargement due to an increase in protein or RNA content without DNA replication or cytokinesis. RNA-seq revealed that the downstream genes of miR-128 are involved in pathways of DNA replication, cell cycle, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or dilated cardiomyopathy. Transgenic mice overexpressing miR-128 displayed premature cell cycle exit, cardiac hypertrophy, and cardiac dysfunction. Further analysis is underway to explore the association of miR-128 activation in pathogenesis of congenital heart disease involving abnormalities of myocardial growth.

Cell cycle exit in CMs is accompanied by downregulation of positive cell cycle regulators and upregulation of CDKIs³⁶. Among the target genes regulated by miR-128, is Suz12 whose expression is significantly lower in adult hearts. This finding suggests that Suz12 plays a primary role in CM cell cycle regulation including neonatal cell cycle withdrawal and the later stages of heart development. This study demonstrated that knockdown of Suz12 resulted in a reduction of CM proliferation, which is consistent with its function in gene silencing^23,37 and playing a fundamental role in mouse development³⁸. Accompanied with the upregulation of SUZ12 protein, downregulation of negative cell cycle regulators (such as p27) and upregulation of downstream positive cell cycle regulators such as Cyclin E and CDK2 were observed in the miR-128-deficient heart. P27, as a major member of CIP/KIP CDKI family, has been implicated in CM cell cycle arrest³⁹ and its deletion promotes CM entry into S-phase^40,41,42. P27 can also negatively modulate the activity of Cyclin E-dependent kinase^36,43, a requirement for entry of cells into S-phase⁴⁴. Our data suggest that elimination of miR-128 might activate cell cycle-related genes, in part through SUZ12-regulated histone modification, thereby promoting CM proliferation. Since SUZ12 is a chromatin-associated protein that is broadly distributed, it is likely that it regulates other genes involved in CM proliferation. Thus, it would be informative to perform ChIP-seq and RNA-seq to systemically identify target genes of SUZ12 to better understand how SUZ12 modulates the activity of EZH2, the enrichment of H3K27me3 and transcriptional output. Recent studies on the role played by the nervous system in endogenous heart regeneration are yielding mechanistic insights. For instance, direct mechanical denervation impairs heart regeneration in mammals, but is restored upon administration of neuregulin-1 (NRG1) and nerve growth factor (NGF). Evidence from studies in zebrafish and mice has revealed that NRG1-Erbb signaling is crucial for proper heart formation, CM proliferation, and morphology^45,46,47. Interestingly, our RNA-seq data set revealed downregulation of Erbb2 (NRG1 co-receptor) in miR-128^OE heart. However, it remains to be determined whether the effects of miR-128 on cardiac regeneration following injury are mediated in part by its activity in the nervous system. Using a gain-of-function genetic approach in our neonatal cardiac injury model, we found that miR-128 overexpression inhibited CM proliferation and neonatal heart regeneration. These findings highlight the involvement of miR-128 in the pathway that arrests CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration after birth. To assess the potential therapeutic benefit of miR-128 inhibition in MI, we generated a cardiac-specific, tamoxifen-inducible miR-128 knockout mouse model. The effect of miR-128 deletion on the cell cycle was evident in adult stages, when adult CMs are fully differentiated and quiescent and their ability to divide is quite limited. Using genetic lineage tracing, our results provide proof-of-concept that pre-existing CMs rather than progenitor cells are, in fact, the target cells that respond to miR-128 deletion during regeneration after cardiac damage. These adult CMs lacking miR-128 can be ‘‘rejuvenated’’ to an immature stage that allows them to dedifferentiate and enter a proliferative state, an endogenous program for natural heart regeneration that occurs in the zebrafish and neonatal mice in response to injury⁴⁸. Of particular interest, the changes in cellular capabilities induced by loss of miR-128 result in increased cellular plasticity that allows significant anatomical and functional capacity upon injury, but does not impair heart function under normal conditions.

In summary, our study demonstrates that we can activate endogenous CM proliferation by targeting miR-128, and that this strategy is a potentially valuable approach for inducing myocardial regeneration, and may lead to major therapeutic advances in the treatment of human heart disease.

Methods

Laboratory animals

All research protocols conformed to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health (National Academies Press, eighth edition, 2011). All animal use protocols and methods of euthanasia (pentobarbital overdose followed by thoracotomy) used in this study were approved by the University of Cincinnati Animal Care and Use Committee. An independent review and approval of cell and chemical drug used in this study was conducted by the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). Mice were maintained on a C57BL/6 background and their genotype was determined by PCR from tail DNA. Both male and female mice were randomized in different experiment groups.

Generation of mice with conditional overexpression of miR-128

A construct was engineered for knockin of the miR-128 (miR-128-3p) gene into the Rosa26 locus. Rosa26 genomic DNA fragments (~1.1 kb and ~4.3 kb 5′ and 3′ homology arms, respectively) were amplified from C57BL/6 BAC DNA, cloned into the pBasicLNeoL vector sequentially by in-fusion cloning, and confirmed by sequencing. The miR-128 gene, under the control of tetO-minimum promoter, was also cloned into the vector between the two homology arms. In addition, the targeting construct also contained a loxP sites flanking the neomycin resistance gene cassette for positive selection and a diphtheria toxin A (DTA) cassette for negative selection. The construct was linearized with ClaI and electroporated into C57BL/6N ES cells. After G418 selection, seven-positive clones were identified from 121 G418-resistant clones by PCR screening. Six-positive clones were expanded and further analyzed by Southern blot analysis, among which four clones were confirmed with correct targeting with single-copy integration. Correctly targeted ES cell clones were injected into blastocysts, and the blastocysts were implanted into pseudo-pregnant mice to generate chimeras by Cyagen Biosciences Inc. Chimeric males were bred with Cre deleted mice from Jackson Laboratories to generate neomycin-free knockin mice. The correct insertion of the miR-128 cassette and successful removal of the neomycin cassette were confirmed by PCR analysis with the primers listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Mice with doxycycline-inducible CM-specific overexpression of miR-128 (miR-128-3p) were generated by crossing α-MHC-tTA (The Jackson Laboratory) mice with miR-128^TetRE mice, in which tetracycline-responsive transcriptional activator (tTA) expression is under the control of α-MHC promoter. Doxycycline (Dox, Harland Laboratories) containing diet was administered to repress transgene expression.

Generation of mice with a conditional deletion of miR-128

A construct was engineered for conditional disruption of the miR-128 (miR-128-3p) gene in which a 1.7 kb fragment spanning the miR-128 gene was flanked by two loxP sites. The 1.7 kb fragment, the 5.4 kb left homology arm, and the 2.9 kb right homology arm were amplified from C57BL/6 BAC DNA and cloned into the pBasicLFNeoFL vector sequentially by in-fusion cloning and confirmed by sequencing. In addition to conditional knockout (cKO) region and homology arms, the targeting construct also contains Frt sites flanking the neomycin cassette for positive selection and a DTA cassette for negative selection. The construct was linearized with NotI and electroporated into C57BL/6N ES cells. After G418 selection, three-positive clones were identified from 280 G418-resistant clones by PCR screening. The positive clones were expanded and further analyzed by Southern blot. The random integration of extra copies of targeting construct was excluded by hybridization with a neomycin probe. To generate chimeras, ES cell clones were microinjected into blastocysts, and the blastocysts were implanted into pseudo-pregnant foster mice by Cyagen Biosciences Inc. Chimeric males were bred with Flp deleter mice from Jackson Laboratories to generate neomycin-free floxed mice. The correct integration of loxP sites and the successful removal of the neomycin cassette were confirmed by PCR analysis with the primer listed in Supplementary Table 1. Cardiac-specific miR-128 knockout mice (miR-128^−/−) were generated by crossing Nkx2.5^Cre (The Jackson Laboratory) mice with miR-128^fl/fl mice.

Tamoxifen (TAM) inducible CM-specific miR-128 knockout mice (iKO) were generated by crossing α-MHC^MerCreMer mice (Tg(α-MHC-cre/Esr*)1Jmk/J, The Jackson Laboratory) with miR-128^fl/fl mice. Induction of Cre recombinase activity was achieved using two doses of tamoxifen (Sigma, 0.25 mg g⁻¹ body weight) dissolved in corn oil (Sigma) and administrated intraperitoneally (i.p.) on day 1 and 3.

A dual-lineage tracing system was established to investigate the origin of regenerated CMs. α-MHC^MerCreMer mice were crossed with Rosa26-tdTomato (R26R-mTmG, The Jackson Laboratory) reporter mice and miR-128^fl/fl mice to generate iKO-mTmG mice (α-MHC^MerCreMer;miR-128^fl/+;R26R-mTmG) to label miR-128 null CM with red color following tamoxifen administration. All mice were maintained on a C57BL/6 background.

RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis

RNA-seq experiments were performed by the Genomics, Epigenomics and Sequencing Core (GESC) at the University of Cincinnati. To analyze differential gene expression, sequence reads were aligned to the mouse genome (mm10) by using standard Illumina sequence analysis pipeline, which was performed by The Laboratory for Statistical Genomics and Systems Biology at the University of Cincinnati.

The sample processing, sequencing, and data analysis were described in previous publications^49,50. Sample tissues were homogenized in 0.6 ml lysis/binding buffer from the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, AM1560) using a Bullet Blender Storm homogenizer (MIDSCI). Total RNA extract was performed according to the mirVana protocol, and the RNA was eluted with 100 μl of elution buffer. Quality of RNA was assessed using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).

RNA-seq reads were processed to remove quality reads and then aligned to the mouse reference genome using TopHat2 aligner⁵¹. Reads aligning to known gene were counted using Bioconductor packages for next-generation sequencing data analysis⁵². The differential expression analysis between miR-128^OE hearts and control samples was performed using the negative binomial statistical model of read counts as implemented in the edgeR Bioconductor package⁵³. The KEGG pathways⁵⁴ and MSigDb gene sets⁵⁵ enrichment analysis was performed using LRpath methodology as implemented in the CLEAN package⁵⁶, and ranked by the enrichment P-value. Functional enrichment analysis of the genes that are both downregulated in miR-128^OE hearts and are predicted targets of miR-128 is performed using PANTHER enrichment analysis tool⁵⁷.

Neonatal CM isolation and culture

Neonatal rat CMs were isolated from ventricles of 1-day-old neonatal Sprague–Dawley rats (Harland) using a neonatal CM isolation kit (Worthington Biochemical, LK003300) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Neonatal mouse CMs were isolated from 1-day-old (P1) C57BL/6 mice with a modified protocol as previously described⁵⁸. Briefly, after washing and mincing the neonatal mouse hearts with PBS (without Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺) supplemented with 20 mM BDM (Sigma-Aldrich), tissue fragments were incubated in the isolation medium (PBS supplemented with 20 mM BDM and 0.0125% trypsin) with gentle agitation 4 °C overnight. Predigested tissue fragments were then transferred into the freshly made digestion medium (1.5 mg ml⁻¹, collagenase/dispase mixture, Roche) and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged to yield the isolated cell pellets. Cells were plated and incubated for 2 h in cell culture incubator. The adherent fibroblast were further cultured and harvested. The non-adherent CMs were re-suspended and cultured in 0.1% gelatin plus with 10 µg ml⁻¹ fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich, F1141) coated slides with 68% Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) high-glucose medium supplemented with 17% M-199, 4% horse serum (Gibco, 26050088), 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (hereafter referred to as ‘‘complete-medium’’) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After the cells were allowed to adhere for 24 h, miR-128 mimic (50 nM, Dharmacon, C-310957-01-0005), miR-128 inhibitor (50 nM, Dharmacon, IH-310957-02-0005), or siRNA against Suz12 (50 nM, Dharmacon, L-040180-00-0020) transfection were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 48 h, cells were harvested for analysis. Control samples were transfected with an equal concentration of negative control mimic, inhibitor or siRNA.

Adult CM isolation and culture

Adult mouse CMs were isolated from adult C57BL/6 mice with a modified protocol as described⁵⁹. Briefly, the aorta of the excised heart was clamped and mounted on a Langendorf apparatus and perfused with calcium-free perfusion buffer (113 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 0.6 mM KH₂PO₄, 0.6 mM Na₂HPO₄, 1.2 mM MgSO₄, 10 mM Na-HEPES, 12 mM NaHCO₃, 10 mM KHCO₃, 0.032 mM phenol red, 30 mM taurine, 10 mM BDM, and 5.5 mM glucose; pH-7.0.), followed by digestion with 50 ml perfusion buffer containing 15,000 U of type II collagenase (Roche) and 50 μM CaCl₂. Stop digestion when the heart became slightly pale and flaccid. Then the heart was gently teased into small pieces with forceps, and triturated with a Pasteur pipette to dissociate individual CM. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged to yield CM pellets. The adult mouse CMs were cultured on laminin (10 µg ml⁻¹, Life technologies, 23017015) coated slides with AW medium (Cellutron life technologies, m-8034) with 10% FBS.

Luciferase reporter assay

The DNA fragment containing 3′ untranlsted regions (3′UTR) was amplified by PCR and cloned into luciferase reporter vector-psiCHECK2 (Promega, C8021). The reporter vector containing mutant 3′UTR was generated using a Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (New England Biolabs). HEK-293 cells (ATCC, CRL-1573) were transfected using DharmaFECT Duo reagent (Dharmacon, T-2020-01) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with luciferase reporter vector and miR-128 mimic (Dharmacon, C-310957-01-0005). Cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity using Dual-Glo^TM kit (Promega, E2920) 48 h after transfection as previously described⁶⁰. Cell lysates were assayed in a luminometer normalizing firefly to renilla luciferase activity. Data were expressed as percent inhibition relative to control miRNA mimic transfected cells.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen), followed by DNase treatment and purification using RNeasy mini column kit (Qiagen, 74104). Complementary DNA was synthesized using miScript PCR Starter Kit (Qiagen, 218193) according to the manufacture’s instruction. qPCR was performed on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR system (Bio-Rad) using the miScript PCR Starter Kit. The fold changes of each target mRNA expression relative to GAPDH under experimental and control conditions were calculated based on the threshold cycle (CT) as r = 2−Δ(ΔCT), where ΔCT = CT(target)−CT(GAPDH) and Δ(ΔCT) = ΔCT(experimental) − ΔCT(control). The primers for qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation-qPCR (ChIP-qPCR) assay

ChIP assay was performed as described previously⁶¹. Heart tissue was cut into small pieces and crosslinked with PBS with 1% formaldehyde (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 28906) at room temperature for 10 min. Fixation was terminated by addition of 0.125 M (final concentration) glycine (Sigma-Aldrich, 50046) at room temperature for 5 min. Chromatin was isolated by addition of lysis buffer, followed by disruption with a Dounce homogenizer. Lysates were sonicated and sheared into a size range of ~200–500 bp.

An aliquot of chromatin (30 μg) was precleared with Dynabeads Protein G (Life Technologies, 10009D) at 4 ^oC for 1h. The precleared chromatin was immunoprecipitated using antibodies as follows: SUZ12 (D39F6) (Cell Signaling Technology, 3737, 1:100), EZH2 (D2C9) (Cell Signaling Technology, 5246, 1:100) and H3K27me3 (C36B11) (Cell Signaling Technology, 9733, 1:50). Chromatin were decrosslinked by incubation with proteinase K at 65 °C for overnight, and ChIPed DNA was purified by MinElute kit (Qiagen, 28004). Genomic DNA (Input) was prepared from an aliquot of precleared chromatin by decrosslinking and purification. The resulting DNA was quantified on a Qubit spectrophotometer.

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed with ice-cold cell lysis buffer plus protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich, P8340). Protein samples (40 µg) were mixed and resolved in 4 × SDS/PAGE sample buffer and boiled for 15 min before loading onto 10% polyacrylamide gels (Bio-Rad). The electrophoresed proteins were transferred from the gel to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Equal loading and transfer of proteins was confirmed by quantitative Ponceau red staining. Membranes were incubated for 60 min with 5% dry milk and Tris-buffered saline to block nonspecific binding sites. Membranes were immunoblotted overnight at 4 °C with antibodies against Cyclin E (M-20) (Santa Cruz, SC-481, 1:500), SUZ12 (D39F6) (Cell Signaling Technology, 3737, 1:1000), CDK2 (72B2) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2546, 1:1000), p27 (D69C12) (Cell Signaling Technology, 3686, 1:1000), PPARγ (81B8) (Cell Signaling Technology, 2443, 1:1000), and GAPDH (Sigma-Aldrich, G9545, 1:5000) on a rocking platform. After washing three times for 5-min with Tris-buffered saline, the membranes were incubated for 60 min with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, washed three times with Tris-buffered saline, and developed with the ECL plus kit (Thermo Scientific). Uncropped immunoblotting images are presented in Supplementary Fig. 11.

Neonatal mouse apex resection

Apex resection (AR) was performed on neonatal mice on postnatal day 1 (P1) as described⁶². All the neonatal mice were anesthetized by hypothermia (on ice for 3–5 min) placing gauze below the pups. Steady pressure on the abdomen was applied to exteriorize the heart when the heart was exposed through a left thoracotomy incision. Then, the ventricular apex was resected using several incisions until the anatomical landmark of the chamber was exposed. The hearts were harvested at 6 h, 24 h, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days post AR. Sham-operated mouse groups (control) underwent chest opening without AR.

Myocardial infarction (MI)

An MI model was developed in female mice, as previously described⁶¹. Briefly, mice (8–10 weeks old) were anesthetized by spontaneous inhalation and maintained under general anesthesia with 1–2% isoflurane. Animals were mechanically ventilated using a rodent ventilator (Harvard Apparatus) connected to an endotracheal tube. The heart was exposed by a left side limited thoracotomy and the LAD was ligated with a 6-0 polyester suture 1 mm from the apex of the normally positioned left auricle.

Echocardiography

Transthoracic echocardiography (Visual Sonics Vevo 2100) was performed with a 40-MHz probe. Hearts were imaged in 2D long-axis view at the level of the greatest LV diameter in animals under light general anesthesia. This view was used to position the M-mode cursor perpendicular to the LV anterior and posterior walls. LV end-diastolic (LVDd) and end-systolic diameters (LVDs) were measured from M-mode recordings. LV EF was calculated as: EF% = [(LVDd)³-(LVDs)³/(LVDd)³ × 100]. LV FS was determined as: FS% = [(LVDd–LVDs)/LVDd × 100]. All measurements were performed according to the American Society for Echocardiography leading-edge technique standards, and were averaged over three consecutive cardiac cycles.

EdU pulse-chase experiment

For EdU (5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine, Life technology) labeling experiments in vivo, animals were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at 200 µg g⁻¹ body weight. EdU staining was performed with Click-iT EdU Imaging kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C10337) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Systemic delivery of siRNA in vivo

SiRNA (Dharmacon) against Suz12 (si-Suz12, L-040180-00-0020) and siRNA control (si-Ctrl, D-001810-01-05) were formulated with MaxSuppressor™ In Vivo RNA-LANCEr II (Bioo Scientific, 3410-01) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mice were injected i.p. at 2 µg g⁻¹ body weight with si-Suz12 or si-Ctrl at P1, P3, P5, and hearts were harvested at P7.

Analysis of left ventricular (LV) fibrotic area

Masson’s trichrome staining was performed to quantify fibrosis area in the left ventricle post injury. An Olympus BX41 microscope equipped with CCD (Magna-Fire TM) camera captured LV area images on each slide. LV fibrosis area and total LV area of each image were measured using the Image J and fibrosis area was reported as a percentage of the total LV area.

Immunohistochemistry assay

After deparaffinization and microwaving antigen retrieval in citric acid buffer, heart sections were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C or overnight at 4 °C with the following antibodies: Anti-cTnT antibody (13-11) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MS-295-P1, 1:100) was used to identify CM. Anti-Ki67 (Abcam, ab15580, 1:200), anti-EdU (Life technology, C10637, 1:500), anti-phosphorylated-histone 3 (Ser10) (pH3, Millipore, 06-570, 1:100), and Aurora B (35C1) (Sigma-Aldrich, A2606, 1:100) antibodies were used to analyze cell cycle activity, DNA synthesis, karyokinesis, and cytokinesis respectively. After triple washing in PBS, slides were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C with fluorescence conjugated second antibodies (Jackson Immuno Research). For WGA staining, slides were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C with primary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluo 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, W11261, 1:500) in PBS. To quantify apoptotic CMs, additional mouse hearts were subjected to TUNEL (Promega) and cTnT (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MS-295-P1, 1:100) staining according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To quantify CM proliferation, cells were stained with Ki67 and pH3. DAPI was used for nuclear counterstaining. Four fields of each section were examined for quantification. Fluorescent imaging was performed with an Olympus BX41 microscope equipped with an epifluorescence attachment.

Statistical analysis

Results were statistically analyzed with the use of the StatView 5.0 software package (Abacus Concepts Inc., Berkeley, CA). All values are expressed as means ± SEM. Student’s t-test was applied appropriately for comparison between two treatment groups. One-way ANOVA (using the post-hoc Bonferroni/Dunn test) was performed for comparisons of multiple groups in each of the specific experimental designs presented in the figures.

Data availability

All of the raw sequencing data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI GEO (Accession code: GSE107684).

All other supporting data from this study are available from the article and Supplementary Information files, or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Li, M. & Izpisua Belmonte, J. C. Mending a faltering heart. Circ. Res. 118, 344–351 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mummery, C. et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation 107, 2733–2740 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 104, e30–e41 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kikuchi, K. Dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, and proliferation: Mechanisms underlying cardiac muscle regeneration in zebrafish. Curr. Pathobiol. Rep. 3, 81–88 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Foglia, M. J. & Poss, K. D. Building and re-building the heart by cardiomyocyte proliferation. Development 143, 729–740 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Porrello, E. R. et al. Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 187–192 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Porrello, E. R. et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331, 1078–1080 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kikuchi, K. et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bergmann, O. et al. Dynamics of cell generation and turnover in the human heart. Cell 161, 1566–1575 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bergmann, O. et al. Cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Circ. Res. 110, e17–e18 (2012) (author reply e19–21).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bergmann, O. et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 324, 98–102 (2009).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Eulalio, A. et al. Functional screening identifies miRNAs inducing cardiac regeneration. Nature 492, 376–381 (2012).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Liu, N. & Olson, E. N. MicroRNA regulatory networks in cardiovascular development. Dev. Cell 18, 510–525 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qian, L. et al. miR-24 inhibits apoptosis and represses Bim in mouse cardiomyocytes. J. Exp. Med. 208, 549–560 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tan, C. L. et al. MicroRNA-128 governs neuronal excitability and motor behavior in mice. Science 342, 1254–1258 (2013).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin, W. et al. Interferon-gamma inhibits central nervous system remyelination through a process modulated by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Brain: J. Neurol. 129, 1306–1318 (2006).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Lin, W. et al. The integrated stress response prevents demyelination by protecting oligodendrocytes against immune-mediated damage. J. Clin. Invest. 117, 448–456 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghashghaei, H. T. et al. Reinduction of ErbB2 in astrocytes promotes radial glial progenitor identity in adult cerebral cortex. Genes Dev. 21, 3258–3271 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
John, B. et al. Human microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2, e363 (2004).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
He, A. et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 regulates normal development of the mouse heart. Circ. Res. 110, 406–415 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Conditional ablation of Ezh2 in murine hearts reveals its essential roles in endocardial cushion formation, cardiomyocyte proliferation and survival. PLoS ONE 7, e31005 (2012).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Peruzzi, P. et al. MicroRNA-128 coordinately targets polycomb repressor complexes in glioma stem cells. Neuro. Oncol. 15, 1212–1224 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cao, R. & Zhang, Y. SUZ12 is required for both the histone methyltransferase activity and the silencing function of the EED-EZH2 complex. Mol. Cell 15, 57–67 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zeng, X. C., Li, L., Wen, H. & Bi, Q. MicroRNA-128 inhibition attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis by the targeted activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Mol. Med. Rep. 14, 129–136 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Uygur, A. & Lee, R. T. Mechanisms of cardiac regeneration. Dev. Cell 36, 362–374 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Burridge, P. W., Sharma, A. & Wu, J. C. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of human cardiac reprogramming and differentiation in regenerative medicine. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 461–484 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Adlakha, Y. K. & Saini, N. Brain microRNAs and insights into biological functions and therapeutic potential of brain enriched miRNA-128. Mol. Cancer 13, 33 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krichevsky, A. M., King, K. S., Donahue, C. P., Khrapko, K. & Kosik, K. S. A microRNA array reveals extensive regulation of microRNAs during brain development. RNA 9, 1274–1281 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krichevsky, A. M., Sonntag, K. C., Isacson, O. & Kosik, K. S. Specific microRNAs modulate embryonic stem cell-derived neurogenesis. Stem Cells 24, 857–864 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ciafre, S. A. et al. Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 334, 1351–1358 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. MicroRNA-128 inhibits glioma cells proliferation by targeting transcription factor E2F3a. J. Mol. Med. 87, 43–51 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Witman, N., Heigwer, J., Thaler, B., Lui, W. O. & Morrison, J. I. miR-128 regulates non-myocyte hyperplasia, deposition of extracellular matrix and Islet1 expression during newt cardiac regeneration. Dev. Biol. 383, 253–263 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brooks, G., Poolman, R. A. & Li, J. M. Arresting developments in the cardiac myocyte cell cycle: role of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Cardiovasc. Res. 39, 301–311 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sadiq, S., Crowley, T. M., Charchar, F. J., Sanigorski, A. & Lewandowski, P. A. MicroRNAs in a hypertrophic heart: from foetal life to adulthood. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 92, 1314–1331 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Marshall, C. B. & Shankland, S. J. Cell cycle and glomerular disease: a minireview. Nephron. Exp. Nephrol. 102, e39–e48 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ahuja, P., Sdek, P. & MacLellan, W. R. Cardiac myocyte cell cycle control in development, disease, and regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 87, 521–544 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pasini, D., Bracken, A. P., Jensen, M. R., Lazzerini Denchi, E. & Helin, K. Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase activity. Embo. J. 23, 4061–4071 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Koontz, J. I. et al. Frequent fusion of the JAZF1 and JJAZ1 genes in endometrial stromal tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6348–6353 (2001).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Poolman, R. A., Gilchrist, R. & Brooks, G. Cell cycle profiles and expressions of p21CIP1 AND P27KIP1 during myocyte development. Int. J. Cardiol. 67, 133–142 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nakayama, K. et al. Mice lackingp27(Kip1) display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell 85, 707–720 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fero, M. L. et al. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility inp27(Kip1)-deficient mice. Cell 85, 733–744 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kiyokawa, H. et al. Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27(Kip1). Cell 85, 721–732 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sherr, C. J. & Roberts, J. M. Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev. 9, 1149–1163 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sears, R. C. & Nevins, J. R. Signaling networks that link cell proliferation and cell fate. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11617–11620 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hertig, C. M., Kubalak, S. W., Wang, Y. & Chien, K. R. Synergistic roles of neuregulin-1 and insulin-like growth factor-I in activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and cardiac chamber morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37362–37369 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Reischauer, S., Arnaout, R., Ramadass, R. & Stainier, D. Y. Actin binding GFP allows 4D in vivo imaging of myofilament dynamics in the zebrafish heart and the identification of Erbb2 signaling as a remodeling factor of myofibril architecture. Circ. Res. 115, 845–856 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
D’Uva, G. et al. ERBB2 triggers mammalian heart regeneration by promoting cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 627–638 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Laflamme, M. A. & Murry, C. E. Heart regeneration. Nature 473, 326–335 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Deletion hotspots in AMACR promoter CpG island are cis-regulatory elements controlling the gene expression in the colon. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000334 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Whitson, J. A. et al. Transcriptome of the GSH-depleted lens reveals changes in detoxification and EMT signaling genes, transport systems, and lipid homeostasis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, 2666–2684 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Huber, W. et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nat. Methods 12, 115–121 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Anders, S. et al. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1765–1786 (2013).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Woodard, L. E. et al. Temporal self-regulation of transposition through host-independent transposase rodlet formation. Nucl. Acids Res. 45, 353–366 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Freudenberg, J. M., Joshi, V. K., Hu, Z. & Medvedovic, M. CLEAN: CLustering Enrichment ANalysis. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 234 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
Thomas, P. D. et al. PANTHER: a library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res. 13, 2129–2141 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Graham, E. L. et al. Isolation, culture, and functional characterization of adult mouse cardiomyoctyes J. Vis. Exp. e50289 (2013).
Li, D., Wu, J., Bai, Y., Zhao, X. & Liu, L. Isolation and culture of adult mouse cardiomyocytes for cell signaling and in vitro cardiac hypertrophy. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/51357 (2014).
Wen, Z. et al. MicroRNA-377 regulates mesenchymal stem cell-induced angiogenesis in ischemic hearts by targeting VEGF. PLoS ONE 9, e104666 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Feng, Y. et al. Heat shock improves Sca-1+stem cell survival and directs ischemic cardiomyocytes toward a prosurvival phenotype via exosomal transfer: a critical role for HSF1/miR-34a/HSP70 pathway. Stem Cells 32, 462–472 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mahmoud, A. I., Porrello, E. R., Kimura, W., Olson, E. N. & Sadek, H. A. Surgical models for cardiac regeneration in neonatal mice. Nat. Protoc. 9, 305–311 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81330007, U1601227 to Dr. Xi-Yong Yu.), the National Institutes of Health grants HL107957, HL110740, HL136025, and HL130042 (to Dr. Yigang Wang), the Science and Technology Programs of Guangdong Province (No. 2014A050503047 to Dr. Xiyong Yu and Dr. Yigang Wang, 2015B020225006 to Dr. Xi-Yong Yu), Guangzhou Science and Technology Program (No. 201604010087 to Dr. Xi-Yong Yu.), and the American Heart Association Catalyst (17CCRG33671128) to Dr. Sakthivel Sadayappan and Dr. Yigang Wang. We thank Anne Schaefer (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA) for providing the miR-128^flox/flox mice and Gary E. Shull for manuscript editing.

Author information

Wei Huang, Yuliang Feng and Jialiang Liang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Molecular Target and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511436, China
Wei Huang, Yuliang Feng & Xi-Yong Yu
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA
Wei Huang, Jialiang Liang, Hao Yu, Lin Jiang, Wenfeng Cai, Christian Paul, W. Sean Davidson & Yigang Wang
Department of Molecular Biology, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences and Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525, Gelderland, The Netherlands
Cheng Wang
Samaritan Medical Center, 830 Washington Street, Watertown, NY, 13601, USA
Boyu Wang
College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA
Mingyang Wang
Division of Liver Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
Wei Meng
Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA
Mario Medvedovic & Jenny Chen
Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart, Lung and Vascular Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA
Sakthivel Sadayappan
Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA
Peter J. Stambrook

Authors

Wei Huang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuliang Feng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jialiang Liang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hao Yu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cheng Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Boyu Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mingyang Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lin Jiang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wei Meng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wenfeng Cai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mario Medvedovic
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jenny Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Christian Paul
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
W. Sean Davidson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sakthivel Sadayappan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Peter J. Stambrook
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xi-Yong Yu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yigang Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.H. designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript. Y.F. designed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. J.L. performed ChIP and some of the in vivo experiments, interpreted data, discussed, and edited manuscript. H.Y. participated in the histology assay. C.W. and M.W. performed some RNA-seq data analysis and PANTHER enrichment analysis. L.J., B.W., and W.C. performed the immunoblotting and some of the in vitro experiments. W.M. supplied some study materials. M.M. and J.C. performed statistical and bioinformatics analysis of RNA-seq data and assisted with interpretation of results. C.P. collected data and wrote manuscript. W.S.D., S.S., and P.J.S. performed manuscript editing. X.-Y.Y. and Y.W. (corresponding authors) designed and supervised the study, and performed manuscript editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xi-Yong Yu or Yigang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, W., Feng, Y., Liang, J. et al. Loss of microRNA-128 promotes cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart regeneration. Nat Commun 9, 700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03019-z

Download citation

Received: 06 March 2017
Accepted: 12 January 2018
Published: 16 February 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03019-z

This article is cited by

The scaffold protein AXIN1: gene ontology, signal network, and physiological function
- Lu Qiu
- Yixuan Sun
- Yanfeng Gao
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
Non-coding RNAs as therapeutic targets and biomarkers in ischaemic heart disease
- Andrea Caporali
- Maryam Anwar
- Costanza Emanueli
Nature Reviews Cardiology (2024)
Regeneration of the heart: from molecular mechanisms to clinical therapeutics
- Qian-Yun Guo
- Jia-Qi Yang
- Yu-Jie Zhou
Military Medical Research (2023)
Return of the Tbx5; lineage-tracing reveals ventricular cardiomyocyte-like precursors in the injured adult mammalian heart
- Panagiota Siatra
- Giannis Vatsellas
- Ioannis Kokkinopoulos
npj Regenerative Medicine (2023)
A modified apical resection model with high accuracy and reproducibility in neonatal mouse and rat hearts
- Yihua Bei
- Chen Chen
- Junjie Xiao
npj Regenerative Medicine (2023)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.