Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Supramolecular aptamer nano-constructs for receptor-mediated targeting and light-triggered release of chemotherapeutics into cancer cells


Platforms for targeted drug-delivery must simultaneously exhibit serum stability, efficient directed cell internalization, and triggered drug release. Here, using lipid-mediated self-assembly of aptamers, we combine multiple structural motifs into a single nanoconstruct that targets hepatocyte growth factor receptor (cMet). The nanocarrier consists of lipidated versions of a cMet-binding aptamer and a separate lipidated GC-rich DNA hairpin motif loaded with intercalated doxorubicin. Multiple 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene moieties are incorporated into the doxorubicin-binding motif to trigger the release of the chemotherapeutics by photoisomerization. The lipidated DNA scaffolds self-assemble into spherical hybrid-nanoconstructs that specifically bind cMet. The combined features of the nanocarriers increase serum nuclease resistance, favor their import into cells presumably mediated by endocytosis, and allow selective photo-release of the chemotherapeutic into the targeted cells. cMet-expressing H1838 tumor cells specifically internalize drug-loaded nanoconstructs, and subsequent UV exposure enhances cell mortality. This modular approach thus paves the way for novel classes of powerful aptamer-based therapeutics.


There is a compelling demand for improvements in the effectiveness in both the transport and specific release of therapeutic molecules. A powerful approach is the use of aptamer-based tumor targeting systems1,2,3,4,5 in combination with controlled release of active therapeutics through physico-chemical responses to external stimuli such as pH6,7,8,9, light10,11,12, and chemicals13,14,15, or internal cell markers16,17. Due to their advantages over other targeting reagents such as easy synthesis, low immunogenicity, and high target affinity, DNA aptamers have opened up new opportunities for cellular targeting and have been selected against various cancer types, including prostate18,19,20, pancreatic21,22, colon23,24, and breast cancer25,26,27. However, aptameric molecular nanocarriers are often limited by inefficient cellular uptake and short intracellular half-life as they are naturally susceptible to nuclease-mediated degradation.

Progress has been made to improve serum half-life and cell internalization efficacy by functionalizing nanocarriers with aptamers that target specific surface proteins, for instance polymeric nanoparticles28,29, liposomes30,31,32,33, aptamer-drug conjugates34,35,36, aptamer-antibody conjugates37,38, and aptamer-functionalized quantum dots39,40,41. However, the majority of these approaches entailed significant trade-offs between complicated assembly, suboptimal size, limited payload capacity, and some show insufficient serum stability and cell internalization efficacy. In the case of aptamer-drug conjugates, covalent linking of targeting units to cytotoxic agents is one possibility for efficient treatment; however, in some cases limited by the concern that the attachment may alter their biological activity. Several recent studies employed a native cell-targeting aptamer that was modified by additional nucleobases for drug intercalation as a dual factor for cell targeting and, simultaneously, as a cargo for drug transport42,43,44. Yet, there is an inherent limitation to broader applicability for such architectures: especially when extended to other aptameric platforms for targeting different cell types, even a minor modification of the aptamer sequence with a drug loading unit might result in significant disruption of binding affinity.

An alternative and highly versatile approach to minimize these drawbacks is to incorporate a cell-targeting aptamer unit and separate drug-carrying functionalities into a single multi-functional nano-assembly. These units can be anchored onto a single nanoscaffold through non-covalent interactions, enabling convenient self-assembly of tunable modular components. The advantage of such a system is that simple mixing of the two, or more, moieties would spontaneously self-assemble into a single nanoconstruct containing these motifs. A possible strategy to explore this concept would be harnessing the lipid-based self-assembly of two lipidated structures, one for cell-targeting, the other for drug loading. Potentially suitable candidate cell-targeting moieties are DNA aptamers that bind to extracellular domains of transmembrane receptors, an example being the DNA aptamer cln00345, which binds with high specificity and affinity to the transmembrane receptor “hepatocyte growth factor receptor” HGFR (also called cMet)46. cMet is expressed on the surface of numerous solid tumors.

The DNA-intercalating drug doxorubicin (DxR) is one of the most potent and widely used chemotherapeutics, but its lack of specificity induces adverse side effects and toxicities. Substantial efforts in transforming the use of free DxR into targeted DxR-carrier systems were undertaken47,48,49, but a common limitation is inefficient drug release. Designing multi-functional nano-constructs as delivery vehicles without an efficient release mechanism will probably limit the development of a potent drug delivery platform. The often-used antisense-strategy50,51 is both highly complex and polluting, due to the resulting ODN “waste” strands, hence limited as an efficient release system. In contrast, light is an excellent tool for both actively and remotely controlling the release of biologically active caged compounds52,53. Systematic investigation of light for cytotoxic drug release is scarce, though it promises simple active control with minimal waste accumulation and is well suited for ODN-based carrier systems. Photoresponsive azobenzene derivatives have been incorporated into ODN-backbones to reversibly open and close ODN-duplexes upon light irradiation54,55. Such light-responsive systems can control cellular56,57 and biological activities like regulation of gene expression58 or reversible tuning of DNA nanoarchitectures59,60,61. However, studies that systematically explore the control of cytotoxic drug release from aptameric cages modified with photo-responsive moieties inside the ODN-backbone are scarce.

Here, we report the design of a versatile and broadly applicable photo-switchable hybrid-aptameric nanoconstruct (HyApNc) as an efficient molecular carrier that selectively targets and transports high doses of DxR directly into cMet-expressing cells and releases the payload under light irradiation. Specifically, we use a truncated, variant of cln003 comprising 40 nucleotides (trCLN3) that binds to cMet with nanomolar affinity and was previously used for aptamer-based affinity labeling of cMet in living cells62. For the drug-carrying domain, a separate 5′-GC-rich hairpin ODN motif was designed to intercalate and transport DxR. We incorporate 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene (DMAB) photoswitches into the drug-carrying ODN domain, enabling controlled release of DxR through UV irradiation. Our concept of a photo-switchable HyApNc addresses key concerns for aptameric delivery platforms: specificity, stability, tuneability, and triggered release. The exemplary system we introduce selectively targets cMet-expressing cells with the aptamer trCLN3 and transports high doses of DxR for release under irradiation. These active components (both trCLN3 and DxR-binding motifs) are chemically modified with four C12-lipids (L4), enabling self-assembly into rigid, multi-component supramolecular structures. The aptamer-motif trCLN3-L4 (3) allows specific binding to cMet on the cell surface, leading to internalization of the HyApNc, carrying DxR intercalated into the DxR-L4 motif. Photo-isomerization of DMAB triggers de-hybridization of the double helix and release of DxR. The design of the system allows using a large variety of other types of lipid-modified aptamers or molecules that all can, in principle, self-assemble into a single functional nanoconstruct so that a highly versatile applicability of this platform becomes possible.


Assembly of anti-cMet trCLN3-L4 nanoconstructs

As a proof of concept, we used the 40-nucleotide anti-cMet DNA aptamer trCLN3 that binds to HGFR (cMet) with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 38 nM62. cMet is expressed on the surface of several types of cancer cells, including the NCI-H1838 lung cancer cell line used here63,64. In a first step (Fig. 1), we synthesized the lipid-modified phosphoramidite 1 with a C12-lipid chain incorporated at the 5-position of the uridine base (Fig. 1a; Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). Four of these modified bases were attached to the 5′-end of the trCLN3 aptamer (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. 3), thereby introducing four lipid tails into each aptamer. The resulting lipid-functionalized aptamer trCLN3-L4 (3) was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (Supplementary Fig. 4) and confirmed by LCMS mass spectrometry (Supplementary Fig. 5). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) of lipidated and non-lipidated trCLN3 aptamers showed significant differences in the migration behavior, consistent with L4-modification (data not shown). Moreover, the L4-modified aptamers showed a strong tendency to self-aggregate in aqueous solution by forming spherical nanoconstructs above a critical micelle concentration (CMC) at room temperature. We evaluated the CMC of the trCLN3-L4 nanoconstructs using Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET; Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Fig. 6; Supplementary Table 1)65,66 and fluorescence studies with pyrene-loaded trCLN3-L4 nanoconstructs (Supplementary Fig. 7; Supplementary Table 2)67. Both methods yielded CMC values in the range of 300–350 nM concentrations. The size and morphology of the nanoconstructs were further studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM; Fig. 1c) and electron microscopy (TEM; Supplementary Fig. 8). To obtain a statistical evaluation of the size distribution of nanoconstructs, the diameters of at least 50 nanoconstructs for each AFM image were compiled in histograms and fitted by Gaussian distributions (Fig. 1d). The trCLN3-L4 3 nanoconstructs have an average diameter of 21.2 ± 1.5 nm (Fig. 1d), consistent with the size of 25 nm measured by TEM.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Assembly and characterization of the photo-switchable aptameric nanoconstruct. a Structures of the lipid-functionalized dU-phosphoramidite 1, the 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene-D-threoninol residue 2, and doxorubicin DxR. b The lipid-functionalized anti-cMet aptamer trCLN3-L4 3 and its self-assembly into the corresponding trCLN3-L4 nanoconstruct. c AFM images of the trCLN3-L4 3 nanoconstruct shows its size and morphology. Scale bar: 200 nm. d Size distribution of the trCLN3-L4 3 nanoconstructs. e The lipid-functionalized DxR-carrier hairpin motif DxR-L4 4 modified with 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene 2 (purple), and the self-assembly of 3, 4, and DxR (blue) to form DxR-loaded HyApNc-DxR nanoconstruct. f AFM images of the HyApNc-DxR nanoconstruct shows its size and morphology. Scale bar: 200 nm. g Size distribution of the HyApNc-DxR nanoconstructs. The size distributions in d and g show that the hybrid nanoconstructs HyApNc-DxR are on average about 10 nm larger than the homogeneous trCLN3-L4 nanoconstructs

Effect of lipid modifications on cMet binding and serum nuclease stability

To test the influence of lipid tails on aptamer binding, a competitive filter-binding assay was carried out. Varying concentrations of unlabeled 5′-lipid-functionalized aptamer 3 and its two-point mutant variant trCLN3.mut-L4 (Supplementary Methods) competed with a constant amount of 32P-labeled native trCLN3 aptamer in binding to cMet. Strong cMet binding was observed for trCLN3-L4 with an IC50 value of 43 nM, compared to 56 nM obtained for the non-lipidated native aptamer trCLN3 (Supplementary Fig. 9). This result demonstrates that aptameric nanoconstructs retained their binding affinity to cMet as compared to the non-modified aptamer trCLN3. In contrast, the lipidated mutant aptamer trCLN3.mut-L4 containing two point mutations could not compete with the 32P-trCLN3 for binding to cMet within the tested concentration range, indicating that the displacement of the non-lipidated 32P-trCLN3 from its bound cMet-target by its lipidated counterpart trCLN3-L4 is specific.

Since an adequate serum half-life is a prerequisite for the successful in vivo application of these aptamers, the serum stabilities of aptamer trCLN3, its double point mutant non-binding variant trCLN3.mut, and their corresponding lipid-functionalized derivatives (trCLN3-L4 and trCLN3.mut–L4, respectively) were analyzed in 90% PBS-buffered fetal calf serum (FCS) (Fig. 2a) and in freshly prepared human blood serum (HBS, Fig. 2b) at 37 °C from 0 to 72 h (full uncropped PAGE included as Supplementary Figs. 10, 11). A comparison of degradation profiles between FCS and HBS (Fig. 2c) revealed fairly similar patterns of aptamer degradation for both serum samples. The non-lipidated variants of the aptamer samples degraded 1.5-fold faster in HBS compared to FCS. Under similar conditions the serum half-life (t1/2) of trCLN3 was 8.7 h (90% PBS-buffered FCS) and 4.9 h (90% PBS-buffered HBS), respectively, compared to its lipid-functionalized derivative trCLN3-L4 showing no significant degradation even up to 72 h of incubation in both sera. To exclude the possibility that the differences in serum stability are due to the G-quadruplex present in both trCLN3-L4 and trCLN3, we also compared serum stabilities of trCLN3.mut-L4 and trCLN3.mut, both not capable of forming a G-quadruplex. The t1/2 values of trCLN3.mut-L4 in FCS (~30.6 h) and in HBS (~36.8 h), respectively, was approximately 10-fold and 19-fold higher than that of the non-lipidated variant trCLN3.mut (t1/2 = 2.8 h in FCS; 1.9 h in HBS). These observations clearly indicate that the serum stability of the mutant aptamer is lower than that of trCLN3 native aptamer, and lipidation further protects the aptamer against enzymatic degradation thereby increasing the serum stability several fold.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Serum stability of trCLN3 aptamer and its lipid-functionalized derivatives. a, b PAGE-analysis of the degradation pattern of aptamer trCLN3, trCLN3.mut, trCLN3-L4, and trCLN3.mut-L4 in 90% PBS-buffered fetal calf serum (FCS) and 90% PBS-buffered human blood serum (HBS), respectively. γ-32P-ATP-labeled aptamer bands of the unmodified trCLN3 (row I), trCLN3.mut (row II), trCLN3-L4 (row III), and trCLN3.mut-L4 (row IV), respectively, at different time intervals. Bands at the migration level of the 0 h sample represent 100% intact aptamer, whereas signals at lower positions correspond to decomposition products. c Comparison of the degradation pattern of lipidated vs. non-lipidated motifs at different time point of 0.3–72 h. Aptamer band intensities were calculated from gels as in a, b, row I–IV; the percentage of intact aptamer was calculated and a curve was fitted to the resulting time course. The half-lives (t1/2) of the selected aptamers were determined from the half-life curve fitting and are shown in brackets of the corresponding legends (n = 2, error bars: mean ± S.D.)

Design of a photoswitchable DxR-binding motif

We next synthesized the thermodynamically stable lipid-modified DNA motif 4 (Fig. 1e) consisting of a preferred DxR-binding 37 nucleotide alternating GC sequence combined with four DMAB moieties and 4-lipid tails attached to the 5′-end (Fig. 3a, b). Motif 4 was designed to bind and release DxR reversibly by irradiating with UV or visible light (Supplementary Methods) and the integrity of the DxR-L4 motif 4 was confirmed by LC-MS (Supplementary Fig. 12). Reversible photoswitching of the four DMAB groups contained in motif 4 was investigated by UV/vis spectroscopy. The switching process is fully reversible and can be repeated for at least five irradiation cycles (Fig. 3c). This result is further supported by gel electrophoresis of the DMAB-modified GC-rich hairpin structure that showed a change in electrophoretic shift upon repeated irradiation with UV and visible light for 5 min each (Fig. 3d; Supplementary Fig. 13), consistent with significant structural changes between the hairpin and dehybridized motif.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Switching behavior of the DxR-binding motif. a Schematic of lipid-modified hairpin-duplex motif with repetitive 5′-CG-3′ base pairs for DxR intercalation. The modified DxR-L4 motif 4 shows the positions of DMAB switches on a D-threoninol backbone marked with a red cross X = 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene; and four lipid chains are attached to the 5′-end. b Schematic of the switch mechanism mediated by the DMAB photoswitch. c UV/vis spectrum of DxR-L4 motif 4 in a range between λ = 300 and λ = 420 nm, showing two sets of curves for the reversible photo switching of the DMAB moiety for alternating irradiation with UV (solid lines) and visible light (vis., dotted lines). The absorption maximum lies at λ = 345 nm. d Analytical PAGE analysis of reversible switching 2′,6′-dimethylazobenzene functionalized DxR-L4 motif 4. e Fluorescence emission spectra (λex = 480 nm) of a DxR solution with increasing molar ratios of 4 in the range of 1–7 µM (0.1–0.7 equiv.) showing a reduction in fluorescence intensity of DxR with an increasing concentration of added motif 4. f Comparison of fluorescence quenching of DxR with the DMAB moiety in trans- (black circles) and in cis- (white squares) conformation (n = 3, error bars: mean ± S.E.M.)

The goal of intercalating and efficiently delivering multiple DxR molecules per motif 4 was investigated by binding studies between motif 4 and DxR. A fixed concentration (10 µM) of DxR was incubated with an increasing molar ratio of motif 4 (1–7 µM) and fluorescence quenching due to intercalation of DxR was used to examine the binding efficiency. Gradual decrease of the fluorescence intensity of DxR was observed upon binding to increasing amounts of motif 4 (Fig. 3e). We further tested the difference in binding affinity of motif 4 for the cis- and trans-conformations of the DMAB groups. To do so, motif 4 was separately irradiated with visible light (λ = 450 nm) and UV light (λ = 365 nm) for 5 min each and mixed with a fixed concentration of DxR (10 µM), while the concentration of motif 4 was varied from 0.1–0.7 equivalents to that of the DxR concentration. The fluorescence curve of motif 4 with DMAB in trans-conformation (λ = 450 nm) showed a higher reduction in fluorescence intensity with an increasing molar equivalent of added motif 4 as compared to 4 in which the DMAB moieties were in cis-conformation. The difference in fluorescence intensity is about 30% higher in case of trans-DMAB than in cis-DMAB (Fig. 3f). This difference in fluorescence intensities further supports the conclusion, that the DMAB-modified motif 4 is destabilized by irradiation with UV-light thereby releasing DxR.

Next, we evaluated the percentage of DxR bound to motif 4. A fixed amount of motif 4 (5 µM) intercalated with a 10-fold excess of DxR for 12 h followed by a purification step using spin filtration (Supplementary Methods). After each centrifugation step, a UV/vis spectrum of the flow through washing was recorded. A 20% reduction in DxR absorbance confirmed that approximately eight equivalents of DxR intercalate per motif 4, and that two equivalents of excess DxR are removed through repeated washing (Supplementary Fig. 14).

We then quantified the DxR release from the loaded DxR-L4 motifs under photoirradiation by an HPLC assay, detecting the fluorescence of the remaining DxR bound to motif 4 after removing unbound excess DxR from the solution. Phenol/CHCl3 (1:1) washing is known to remove unbound excess DxR in the presence of DNA duplexes without removing the intercalated DxR68. We then compared the amount of released DxR to that observed by self-diffusion of DxR into the buffer medium incubated at 37 °C over time (Supplementary Fig. 15a, b). After 5 min of UV irradiation (λ = 365 nm, 350 mW cm−2), an approximately 3-fold drop in fluorescence emission was observed for the irradiated sample compared to the non-irradiated sample. Thus, UV irradiation triggered a rapid release of 63% of the encapsulated DxR (Supplementary Fig. 15a). In contrast, a non-irradiated sample incubated at 37 °C released only about 20% of the loaded DxR from motif 4 over 48 h of incubation, due to thermal self-diffusion (Supplementary Fig. 15b). To compare the UV-induced DxR release to thermally driven DxR diffusion at a fixed time interval, aliquots of sample incubated at 37 °C for 48 h were analyzed before and after irradiation with 365 nm UV light for 5 min. The release of DxR was monitored by measuring the fluorescence of irradiated vs. non-irradiated sample at 590 nm using a fluorescence detector attached to HPLC. DxR-loaded motif 4 incubated at 37 °C without UV exposure led to a release of 20% of the loaded DxR within 48 h of incubation by thermal self-diffusion. The same sample, however, released an additional 50% of the loaded DxR immediately after UV irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 15b, black square). These results support the conclusion that the release of DxR from the motif 4 is stimulated by UV irradiation.

Lipid-mediated self-assembly of motifs 3 and 4 forms HyApNc

We next combined both lipid-modified motifs 3 and 4 to test their lipid-mediated self-assembly into heterogeneous HyApNc. By mixing free Atto-647N-trCLN3-L4 (Atto647N-3) with Atto550-labeled DxR-L4 motif (Atto550-4) in different ratios, hybrid nanoconstructs were formed and stabilized by the strong hydrophobic interaction of the lipid tails. The Atto-dye labels were attached at the 5′-end in immediate proximity to the lipid modifications to ensure that intermolecular FRET effects report the formation of micellar nanoconstructs. In the FRET experiment nanoconstructs self-assembled by mixing a fixed concentration of 5 μM Atto647N-3 with Atto550-4 in concentrations ranging between 1 and 15 μM (Table 1).

Table 1 Atto-labeled motifs 3 and 4 mixed in different ratios to form HyApNc nanoconstructs

Fluorescence at λex = 535 nm (Fig. 4a) showed that the nanoconstructs self-assembled with 0.2 equivalents of Atto550-4 (Atto647N-3:Atto550-4 = 5:1), yielding an intensity ratio I669 × I576−1 of 5.56. In contrast, nanoconstructs self-assembled with 0.35 or 0.5 excess equivalents of Atto550-4 showed an increasing I669 × I576−1 value of 7.32 and 7.88, respectively, a significant enhancement of ~32% and ~41% relative to the Atto647N fluorescence. An increase in FRET observed with increasing concentrations of Atto550-4 reached saturation between 2.0 and 2.5 equivalents (Fig. 4b). Nevertheless the I669 × I576−1 value already reaches 5.93 at one equivalent of Atto-550-4 (Atto647N-3:Atto550-4 = 1:1). Therefore, we maintained this ratio in the subsequent cellular studies to achieve a proper balance between high target affinity (internalization efficiency) and DxR carrying efficiency (cytotoxicity).

Fig. 4
figure 4

FRET study of the formation of functional hybrid-nanoconstruct HyApNc. a Fluorescence emission spectra (λex = 535 nm) for FRET-assembled Atto647N-labeled trCLN3-L4 (Atto647N-3) and Atto550-labeled DxR-L4 motif (Atto550-4) HyApNc formation. Atto647N-3 was kept constant at 5 µM with increasing equivalents of Atto550-4. b Maximum fluorescence intensities at λ = 669 nm (I669) as a function of increasing concentration of Atto550-4 showing an increase in energy transfer (n = 3, error bars mean ± S.D.). Saturation is reached between 2.0 and 2.5 equivalents of Atto550-4. c Comparison of the FRET signal (λex = 535 nm) of HyApNc consisting of 4 (straight) and 4 without the lipid tail (a550-4w/oL4; dashed)

In a control experiment, we employed the Atto550-labeled DxR-binding motif without lipid modification (a550-4w/oL4). With this lipid-devoid motif, only diffusion-controlled encounters between Atto550 and Atto647N can occur, which should result in very low relative intensities. Indeed, with a 1:1 ratio of motif 3 and Atto550-4w/oL4 we observed an I669 × I576−1 value of 0.09, indicating that no hybrid micellar nanoconstructs are forming (Fig. 4c). The FRET signal thus strictly depends on the ratio of the two functional domains and on the presence of the L4 modification. A comparison of FRET efficiency values (Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Fig. 16) suggested the 92% FRET efficiency for assembled HyApNc consisting of motifs Atto550-4 and Atto647N-3 as compared to 27% where both motifs 4 and 3 lack the lipid modifications. When a non-cMet-binding Atto647N-labeled mutant trCLN3-L4 motif (Atto647mut-3) was used instead of Atto647N-3, the resulting mutated nanoconstruct HyApNc.mut yielded a FRET efficiency (97%) similar to HyApNc. Together, these data provide evidence that both motifs self-assemble to form hybrid heterogeneous nanoconstructs of spherical geometry when the lipid modifications are present. The FRET signal intensity is also a good measure of integrity of the nanoconstructs.

The resulting HyApNc consisting of 3 and 4 in a 1:1 ratio was further analyzed by AFM to compare its size and structural features with nanoconstructs resulting only from motif 3. We observed that the hybrid micellar nanoconstruct retained its spherical shape similar to the homogenous nanoconstructs consisting of only motif 3 (Fig. 1c, f). However, their average diameter is 32.3 ± 2.1 nm—larger than the homogenous nanoconstructs made from trCLN3-L4 (motif 3), which averaged 21.2 ± 1.5 nm (Fig. 1d, g). This increase in size of the heterogenous nanoconstructs as compared to the homogenous ones may result from differences in the physico-chemical properties of the two aptamers in 3 and 4, or from structural differences, or both.

For efficient cell internalization and for successful delivery of the intercalated DxR, the integrity of the mixed micellar nanoconstruts HyApNc, i.e., both motifs 3 and 4, must remain intact as a single nanoconstruct and circulate in complex biological media for a sufficiently long period of time. The stability of the micelles as well as their circulation time is known to be affected by the presence of serum proteins, which alter the micellar equilibrium leading to their dissociation to varying extents69,70. Therefore, we evaluated the integrity of HyApNc upon interaction with HBS, and in presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 37 °C over time (Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Fig. 17a, b, c). We assessed the integrity of the micellar nanoconstruct HyApNc by using the previously assembled FRET pair (see Fig. 4) attached to the 5′-ends of both motifs 3 (Atto647N-3) and 4 (Atto550-4). The intermolecular FRET effect was monitored (Supplementary Fig. 17a, b) and an increase in the fluorescence intensity at 576 nm and a decrease at 669 nm was observed over time. This result indicates that the micellar nanoconstructs disintegrate gradually in the presence of BSA or serum proteins contained in HBS. The FRET ratio = I669 × (I669 + I576)−1 was calculated and plotted as a function of time (Supplementary Fig. 17c). The HyApNc nanoconstructs exhibited a half-life (t1/2) of 14 h in 95% HBS and of 18 h in 1 mM BSA solution. The time-resolved emission data indicate that the rate of micellar nanoconstruct disintegration in either BSA or HBS was not significantly different. The t1/2 indicates an adequate stability of the micelles in blood serum with slow disintegration under our in vitro experimental conditions. It is possible that the t1/2 of HyApNc will be further reduced in the blood stream in vivo. However, if necessary for in vivo applications the half-life of HyApNc could be further increased by elongating the lipid chains and/or by using unsaturated lipids and crosslinking them at the core of the nanostructures.

Uptake of aptameric nanoconstructs by cMet-expressing cells

After confirming the successful fomation of the aptameric nanoconstructs, the cell targeting ability and internalization efficacy of aptamer trCLN3-L4 (3) mediated by cMet recognition was investigated by using both confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis. Cell uptake experiments were performed with the NCI-H1838 lung cancer cell line that expresses cMet64. NCI-H1838 cells incubated with different concentrations of the Atto647N-3 (10 and 1 µM, respectively) at 37 °C for 90 min, showed a strong and comparable intracellular red fluorescence at both concentrations above the CMC value (Fig. 5a, b and Supplementary Fig. 18a, b for 10 µM; Supplementary Fig. 18c, d for 1 µM). At 1 µM of Atto647N-3, a punctuated pattern of internalized nanostructures was observed in the cytoplasm, suggesting that they may localize in endosomes (Supplementary Fig. 18c, d). Indeed, the same experiment performed at 4 °C showed only a weak membrane-localized fluorescence (Fig. 5c, d) with markedly reduced Atto647N-fluorescence in the H1838 cells, consistent with inhibition of endocytosis at low temperature71. When the Atto647N-3 concentration was reduced to 0.2 µM, which is below the CMC, a significantly weaker fluorescence signal was observed, as expected (Supplementary Fig. 18e, f).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis of Atto647N-trCLN3-L4 internalization. a, b Confocal images of NCI-H1838 cells incubated with Atto647N-labeled trCLN3-L4 (A647N-3) nanoconstructs at 37 °C (a: unmerged; red; c3 and b: overlay; c1 + c2 + c3). c, d NCI-H1838 cells incubated with Atto647N-3 at 4 °C (c: unmerged; red; c3 and d: overlay; c1 + c2 + c3). Arrow: Alexa488-WGA membrane stain (green) shows colocalization with Atto647N-3 (red). e, f NCI-H1838 cells treated with Atto647N.mut-3 at 37 °C (e: unmerged; red; c3 and f: overlay; c1 + c2 + c3). g, h NCI-H1838 cells treated with Atto647N-trCLN3w/oL4 (without lipid modification) at 37 °C (g: unmerged; red; c3 and h: overlay; c1 + c2 + c3). Cells were membrane stained with Alexa488-WGA (green; c2), nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue; c1) and analyzed for Atto647N-3 uptake (red; c3). Scale bars: ah 50 µm. i FACS histograms for cells treated with Atto647N-3 at 37 °C (green shadow) showed a significant shift in Atto647N fluorescence intensity compared to cells treated with Atto647N-3 at 4 °C (red solid line), suggesting an endocytotic internalization pathway. A minimal shift in Atto647 fluorescence intensity was observed for cells treated with either a scrambled aptamer Atto647N.mut-3 (blue solid line) or with Atto647N-trCLN3w/oL4 (black dotted line) at 37 °C compared to untreated cells (gray shadow), indicating a marginal internalization presumably due to non-specific binding or lack of lipidation

H1838 cells incubated with 5′-Atto647N-labeled double mutant of 3 (Atto647N-mut 3) that does not bind to cMet exhibited marginal cellular staining (Fig. 5e, f), consistent with lack of internalization. Finally, the non-lipidated version of Atto647N-trCLN3w/oL4 also showed low cellular staining (Fig. 5g, h), suggesting that lipidation of the cMet-binding aptamer is required for efficient uptake. This result may indicate that protein target binding in solution could differ from targeting the protein at the cell surface. Moreover, lipidation of aptamers potentially improves their ability to target proteins expressed on cell surfaces by self-organizing multiple aptamers in a single nanostructure, although the generality of this notion remains to be demonstrated with other aptamer/target systems.

These findings were further confirmed through flow cytometric studies (Fig. 5i; Supplementary Methods). There was a noticeable change in the fluorescence signal observed for cells treated with free Atto647N-trCLN3w/oL4 (Fig. 5i, black dotted) compared to the auto-fluorescence profile of untreated cells (Fig. 5i, gray area), indicating low internalization. Compared to non-lipidated Atto647N-trCLN3w/oL4, cells treated with Atto647N-3 at 37 °C (Fig. 5i, green area) showed significantly higher shift in fluorescence intensity. A minimal shift in fluorescence intensity was also observed for cells treated with either Atto647N-mut 3 (Fig. 5i, blue curve) or Atto647N-3 at 4 °C (Fig. 5i, red curve) over untreated cells (gray areas), indicating either a low non-specific binding or only a membrane localized binding without internalization at low temperature. Taken together, these results show that important determinants for efficient uptake into H1838 cells are the ability to bind extracellular cMet by the aptamer moieties, the ability to form nanoconstructs due to lipidation, and that the uptake is temperature-dependent, supporting an endocytotic mechanism.

We next performed cellular uptake studies of a dual-labeled hybrid-nanoconstruct (HyApNc) containing a mixture of Atto550-labeled 4 and Atto647N-labeled 3 motifs in a 1:1 ratio. Both fluorescent probes constitute a suitable FRET pair entrapped within the lipid core that can be employed to validate whether the functional nanoconstructs enter and target H1838 cells. The confocal images showed not only the cellular staining for both dyes (Fig. 6a; c2: red, Fig. 6b; c3: magenta), but also a FRET signal (Fig. 6c; c4: cyan) was observed. During confocal imaging all settings were kept constant (for details, see Methods). To evaluate the occurrence of FRET, we analyzed the images using a method that was previously reported72, where the PixFRET plugin of the image processing software ImageJ was used for FRET quantification. Briefly, the bleed-through of the acceptor and donor channels was determined and finally the calculated FRET images were reconstructed (Fig. 6d; white: calculated FRET). The calculated FRET images suggest donor and acceptor dyes are in correct geometry, supporting the integrity of the nanoconstructs. High FRET efficiencies were only observed when the designated constructs were able to enter the cells (Fig. 6a–c). Figure 6e shows the overlay of the images shown in Fig. 6a–d (including nuclear and membrane staining). In contrast, mutated nanoconstructs (HyApNc.mut) containing the non-cMet-binding Atto647N-labeled trCLN3.mut-L4 motif and Atto550-labeled motif 4 resulted in poor FRET efficiencies (Fig. 6f, Supplementary Fig. 19f–j), similar to background signals, indicating that the process of internalization is target-specific rather than occurring randomly.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Cellular uptake of dual-labeled HyApNc consisting of A550-4 and A647N-3 motifs. ac Confocal fluorescence images of H1838 cells treated with the HyApNc consisting of Atto550-DxR-L4 motif (A550-4) and Atto647N-trCLN3-L4 (A647N-3) motifs in 1:1 ratio. Both A647N-3 (a: c2: red) and A550-4 (b: c3: magenta) fluorescence were observed from the cytosol including a FRET-mediated Atto647N signal (c: c4: cyan). d Calculated FRET signal from reconstructed FRET images (d: white) indicate the intracellular integrity of the functional nanoconstruct HyApNc. e, f Overlay images of cells incubated with HyApNc (e: A647N-3 + A550-4), and HyApNc.mut (f: A647N.mut-3 + A550-4) as a negative control with Atto647N-labeled mutant trCLN3.mut-L4 motif. The complete overlay sets for e and f are shown in Supplementary Fig. 19. Aptamer constructs were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by membrane staining with Alexa488-WGA (green), and nuclei staining with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar: af 50 µm

Photo-triggered release of DxR from HyApNc-DxR

After successfully targeting the H1838 cells with HyApNc, we further investigated the selective transport of DxR into the cells, followed by its light triggered release from the HyApNc. The DxR-loaded HyApNc (HyApNc–DxR complex) was prepared by mixing motif 3 and 4 (1:1 ratio) with 10-fold excess of DxR followed by a purification step using spin filtration (details are given in Methods). To ensure minimum cell mortality upon UV irradiation, H1838 cells were irradiated at t = 0, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min, respectively, at an intensity of 350 mW cm−2. Cell viability as a function of time-dependent response to UV treatment was measured by an MTT assay 24 h after irradiation. A maximum survival rate comparable to the non-irradiated control (t = 0 min) was observed at an irradiation time t ≤ 5 min (Supplementary Fig. 20a, b).

To verify the HyApNc-mediated selective transport of DxR to target cells and its light-triggered release from motif 4, we monitored the fluorescence signal of DxR within and outside of the cell nuclei that were treated with either free DxR (as control) or with HyApNc-DxR (details of DxR loading: see Methods), while keeping the DxR concentrations in the bound and the unbound form fixed at 40 µM (5 μM HyApNc carrying eight equivalents of DxR). The release of DxR from HyApNc was investigated by confocal microscopy with and without subsequent irradiation at 365 nm. Confocal images of the H1838 cells at 37 °C after 2 h of incubation showed a decrease in the DxR fluorescence signal in the cell nuclei in the following order: free DxR, HyApNc–DxR complex with and without UV irradiation (λ = 365 nm, 350 mW cm−2) (Fig. 7a–i). Strong DxR fluorescence was observed in cell nuclei after treatment with free DxR, indicating that free DxR readily diffuses through the plasma membrane and accumulates almost exclusively in the nuclear region (Fig. 7a–c). However, the HyApNc–DxR complex without UV irradiation led to a considerably weaker DxR-fluorescence in the nucleus and a noticeable fluorescence within the endoplasm confirming that most of the DxR is predominantly localized outside the nucleus bound to the HyApNc (Fig. 7d–f). In contrast, when the HyApNc–DxR complex is exposed to irradiation (λ = 365 nm, 350 mW cm−2) a discernible increase in both nuclear and extranuclear fluorescence was detected (Fig. 7g–i). When control experiments were performed with a construct lacking DMAB (HyApNcw/oAz-DxR), near-identical DxR fluorescence signals are predominantly observed in the cytosol of the cells with and without UV exposure (Fig. 7j–o). No visible increase in the DxR fluorescence signal was observed in either the nuclei or in the cytosol when the cells treated with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR were irradiated (Fig. 7m–o) compared to non-irradiated cells (Fig. 7j–l).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis of the HyApNc-mediated doxorubicin uptake. ac Confocal image of intracellular distribution of DxR released (yellow signal) from the DxR-loaded HyApNc nanoconstructs in the H1838 cells incubated with free DxR (a: nuclei staining with Hoechst 33342; blue; c1, b: DxR staining; yellow; c2, c: overlay; c1 + c2). df Cells incubated with HyApNc-DxR not exposed to UV irradiation (d: Hoechst 33342; blue; c1, e: DxR staining; yellow; c2, f: overlay; c1 + c2). gi Cells incubated with HyApNc-DxR exposed to UV light, λ = 365 nm, 350 mW cm−2 (g: Hoechst 33342; blue; c1, h: DxR staining; yellow; c2, i: overlay; c1 + c2). jl Cells treated with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR without UV irradiation (j: Hoechst 33342; blue; c1, k: DxR staining; yellow; c2, l: overlay; c1 + c2). mo Cells treated with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR exposed to UV light (λ = 365 nm, 350 mW cm−2) (m: Hoechst 33342; blue; c1, n: DxR staining; yellow; c2, o: overlay; c1 + c2). Blue (c1) and yellow (c2) signals show the fluorescence of Hoechst 33342 and DxR staining, respectively. The overlay (c1 + c2) shows colocalization of Hoechst 33342 and DxR. An increase in nuclear accumulation of DxR upon light triggering was observed only for the photoactivated nanoconstruct. Scale bar: ao 50 µm. p Flow cytometry histogram showing quantitative comparison of DxR accumulation in H1838 cells after incubation with free DxR (orange shadow), mutant non-targeted nanoconstructs HyApNc.mut-DxR (magenta solid), targeted nanoconstructs HyApNc-DxR without UV (purple solid), or with UV irradiation (red dotted). q Flow cytometry histogram showing DxR accumulation in H1838 cells after incubation with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR without UV (blue solid) or with UV irradiation (red dotted) at 37 °C for 2 h. The concentration of DxR either in free form or its equivalent in complex form in the cell culture was fixed at 8 µM. Untreated cells are shown in shadow (gray). The numbers in bracket of the legends are the geometric mean of the corresponding peaks

To further validate these results, the HyApNc-mediated DxR internalization with or without DMAB was evaluated by flow cytometry. As a control, the DxR uptake of the non-targeted mutated nanoconstruct HyApNc.mut-DxR was compared to that of the targeted nanoconstructs HyApNc-DxR (Supplementary Methods). To accomplish this, H1838 cells were incubated with free DxR, HyApNc.mut-DxR, HyApNc-DxR, or targeted nanoconstructs without DMAB (HyApNcw/oAz-DxR) at fixed DxR concentrations of 8 μM either in its free form or in its complex form with the carrier (1 µM of nanocarrier, each containing eight equivalents of DxR). Treatment of cells with free DxR (orange areas) induces a 5-fold increase in mean cellular fluorescence intensity as compared to cells incubated with an equivalent dose of either HyApNc-DxR (Fig. 7p, purple) or HyApNcw/oAz-DxR (Fig. 7q, blue). Instead, irradiation of cells treated with HyApNc-DxR (Fig. 7p, red dotted) induces only about a 1.3-fold shift in the fluorescence intensity compared to the non-irradiated cells (Fig. 7p, purple solid). This small shift in the fluorescence intensity might be due to the limitations of the flow cytometer to discriminate between the nuclear and the extranuclear fluorescence signal. In contrast, cells incubated with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR showed a −1.05-fold shift in fluorescence intensity, and the FACS profile of the irradiated sample (Fig. 7q, red dotted) was comparable to the non-irradiated samples (Fig. 7q, blue solid). Moreover, cells incubated with HyApNc-DxR exhibited a 2.8-fold increase in the mean fluorescence signal compared to cells treated with HyApNc.mut-DxR containing the same amount of DxR in either case (Fig. 7p, purple vs. magenta). This result clearly showed that non-targeted nanoconstructs HyApNc.mut-DxR exhibited significantly lower efficacy in DxR delivery, consistent with their lower level of cellular uptake compared to HyApNc-DxR observed in Fig. 6. Overall this result indicates that after UV irradiation, most of the intercalated DxR was released from HyApNc having DMAB units and subsequently transferred into the nuclei and colocalized with the Hoechst dye.

In vitro cytotoxicity of HyApNc-DxR against NCI-H1838 cells

Having verified that the DxR can be selectively transported into target cells, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of the free DxR, the HyApNc-DxR, and the non-targeting HyApNc.mut-DxR nanoconstructs with and without UV irradiation in H1838 cells by an MTT assay (for details, see Methods) in a dose-dependent way between 0.125 and 50 µM (Fig. 8a). There was a clear dependence of the H1838 cell viability on the concentration of DxR (Fig. 8a). An IC50 of 11 µM (6.5 µg mL−1) was determined for HyApNc-DxR irradiated with UV light (Fig. 8a, blue), and a similar level of cytotoxicity (IC50 = 8 µM [4.7 µg mL−1]) was observed for free DxR (Fig. 8a, red). However, no significant cytotoxicity was measured when cells were either treated with HyApNc-DxR without UV (Fig. 8a, black) or with HyApNc.mut-DxR (Fig. 8a, green). Cells incubated with non-targeting HyApNc.mut-DxR with subsequent UV irradiation under the same conditions (Fig. 8a, green) exhibited about a 38% increase in cell survival compared to cells treated with HyApNc-DxR at 8 µM loaded DxR concentrations (green vs. blue), consistent with their lower level of cellular uptake compared to HyApNc-DxR observed in Fig. 6. This result suggests that the cMet-expressing H1838 cells effectively internalized HyApNc-DxR due to receptor-mediated endocytosis, while non-targeted nanoconstructs exhibited significantly lower efficacy.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cell viability assays of DxR-loaded HyApNc nanoconstructs in NCI-H1838 cells. a Cytotoxicities of HyApNc–DxR and HyApNc.mut–DxR complexes in combination with UV irradiation at the indicated DxR concentrations (0.125–50 µM ranges). As a control, viabilities of the cells treated with free DxR alone and HyApNc–DxR complex without UV irradiation were compared (n = 2, error bars: mean ± S.D.). b 8 h post incubation MTT assays where an increasing number of H1838 cells treated with unloaded HyApNc (gray), photoactive HyApNc-DxR (red), and photo-inactive HyApNcw/oAz-DxR (blue) with and without subsequent UV irradiation (dashed vs. solid lines). As control, cell viabilities of the H1838 cells treated with RPMI medium with 10% FCS and not exposed to UV irradiation (gray solid) were measured at 570 nm (n = 2, error bars: mean ± S.D.). c Time-dependent cytotoxicities of photoactive HyApNc-DxR (red) against photo-inactive HyApNcw/oAz-DxR (blue) with and without UV irradiation (dashed vs. solid lines) where the cells were treated with the DxR complex for various incubation times of 8, 24, and 48 h, respectively, before being subjected to the MTT assay (n = 2, error bars: mean ± S.D.)

As an additional control, we conducted a time-dependent cytotoxicity assay to determine whether DxR release would occur solely through self-diffusion after endocytosis (i.e., no UV radiation). To accomplish this, we used the DMAB lacking construct (HyApNcw/oAz-DxR) at different incubation times. H1838 cells were treated with unloaded HyApNc, HyApNc-DxR, and HyApNcw/oAz-DxR for 2 h at 37 °C at 8 µM DxR dosage. After 2 h post treatment, the cells were washed, the RPMI medium replaced with fresh medium, and some of them (Fig. 8b, dotted) were exposed to UV light for 5 min (λ = 365 nm; 350 mW cm−2), while those that were not irradiated were used as controls (Fig. 8b, solid). Afterward cells were further allowed to incubate at 37 °C for 8, 24, and 48 h, respectively, before being subjected to the MTT assay. Cells treated with only RPMI medium and not exposed to UV irradiation (Fig. 8b, gray solid) served as the primary control.

Cells treated with HyApNc alone in combination with UV irradiation exhibited similar survival rates as non-irradiated cells treated with only RPMI medium (Fig. 8b, gray dotted vs. solid), indicating that neither the nanoconstruct without DxR nor brief UV exposure contribute significantly to cell death. In contrast, the combination of HyApNc-DxR with UV irradiation induced an approximately 2.8-fold decrease of cell viability compared to the treatment with HyApNc-DxR alone (17 vs. 64%) 8 h post treatment (Fig. 8b, red dotted vs. red solid). When cells were treated with the photo-deactivated construct HyApNcw/oAz-DxR in combination with UV light a 0.2-fold decrease of cell viability compared to non-irradiated HyApNcw/oAz-DxR (49 vs. 59%) was measured (Fig. 8b, blue dotted vs. blue solid). This result indicates that the lower cell mortality is related to inefficient release of DxR from the nanoconstrct without DMAB phtoswitches. We further evaluated cell viability for the incubation times of 24 and 48 h under similar conditions as for the 8 h incubation. Cells incubated with HyApNc-DxR without UV irradiation (Fig. 8c, red solid) showed a gradual decrease in viability from 64% (8 h) to 43% (24 h) to 21% (48 h). Cells incubated with HyApNcw/oAz-DxR under the same conditions (Fig. 8c, blue solid) decreased from 59% (8 h) to 44% (24 h) to 19% (48 h). When UV irradiation was applied to the HyApNcw/oAz-DxR-treated cells (Fig. 8c, blue dotted), cell viability was similar. Thus, a clear differentiation between 5 min UV irradiation of HyApNc-DxR and all other conditions was only seen for the 8 and 24 h incubation times, whereas at 48 h incubation cells were killed equally efficient under all conditions that contained DxR. At 48 h, a sufficient amount of intercalated DxR might have diffused from the control-nanoconstructs or the non-UV-irradiated ones spontaneously, and induce cell killing equally efficiently. For UV-irradiated HyApNc-DxR, a ~80% cell mortality is already achieved within a significantly shorter time span of 8 h (Fig. 8c, red dotted).


By exploiting aptamer-mediated selective cell targeting, photo-induced structure switching, and lipid-mediated self-assembly, we have developed a hybrid aptamer-nanoconstruct as a molecular carrier system that allows selective transport of intercalated cytotoxic drugs to target cells and release of the payload under light irradiation. This design offers the possibility to self-assemble multiple functional domains at once into a single nanoconstruct, in our case the targeting ability of an anti-cMet aptamer, and an intercalated drug-carrying motif, compared to the limited possibility of introducing multiple functionalities into a single modified aptamer system through inherent synthetic efforts. Fluorescence studies with pyrene loading showed that the self-aggregated nanoconstructs were stabilized in aqueous solution through hydrophobic interaction of the lipids. The mixed nature of the nanoconstructs and their size was confirmed by FRET studies and AFM measurements. Indeed, such self-assembled structures even offer an unprecedented degree of control over the ratio of different functional domains based on the therapeutic requirements. Moreover, integrating multiple GC-rich hairpin-duplex motifs affords several folds of loading of DxR into a single nanoscaffold, thereby enhancing the payload capacity in comparison to a monomeric aptamer.

Confocal imaging and cell viability assays further demonstrated a highly efficient cell uptake of the designed HyApNc into H1838 cells and an improved effect on tumor cell targeting by releasing DxR inside the cell by a light trigger. We do not mean to suggest that UV light triggering will be compatible with therapy under standard clinical practice, as the penetration depth of light is only a few millimeters. While this skin depth may be sufficient for some melanoma, a better choice would be azobenzene photoswitches that isomerize with red light that has significantly higher skin penetration depth73. Alternatively, fiber optic endoscopy might direct UV light to potential tumor sites deeper inside the body.

An important outcome of our study is that lipidation of the aptamer motifs leads to a stable nanoconstruct with high resistance against nucleases accompanied by a drastically improved cell uptake compared to the unmodified aptamer. Despite using UV light as a trigger for unloading DxR, the induced cell death was successful without killing the cell itself by irradiation. As such, the successful implementation of DMAB into a photoresponsive DNA motif to control the drug release in cells using UV light represents a significant step toward aptamer-based targeted therapeutics. On the other hand, the possible risks associated with UV light such as cellular damage and stability of biological systems can be avoided by using low-intensity irradiation for a short period of time as indicated by our experiments. This concept might be further limited when applying it in vivo where the significant systemic dilution of the nanoconstructs could disintegrate the micelles more rapidly below the CMC. A possible solution to this issue might be attaching longer lipid tails to the ODN motifs, or using unsaturated lipids and cross-linking them inside the lipid core.

Ultimately, our work addresses fundamental obstacles related to aptamer-mediated tumor targeting while designing a multifunctional nanoconstruct with improved nuclease stability, high target-binding affinity, and increased tumor uptake, essential prerequisites for next-generation aptamer-based targeted therapeutics. Taken together, all these combined features make this platform widely applicable for the simultaneous delivery of a variety of different regulatory molecules, such as AntagomiRs, small interfering RNAs, microRNAs, drugs, and other molecules with high specificity and efficiency to specifically block functions of disease-relevant biomolecules.



All chemicals including DxR were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified and were used as received. cMet-Fc, which represents the ectodomain of cMet fused to the Fc domain of human IgG1, was purchased from R&D Systems. Wheat Germ Agglutinin, Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate, and Hoechst 33342 were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). γ-32P-labeled ATP (250 μCi) was purchased from PerkinElmer Health Science B. V., The Netherlands. T4 Polynucleotide kinase and 1 × polynucleotide buffer were obtained from New England Biolabs, Frankfurt a. M., Germany. Binding buffer used for the aptamer competition-binding assay was prepared by adding E. coli tRNA (Roche AG, Mannheim, Germany), BSA (Thermo Fischer Scientific) into Dulbeccos PBS (Gibco, Life Technologies).

All solvents, reagents, and building blocks for oligonucleotide synthesis were obtained from Proligo, Hamburg, Germany. The anti-cMet aptamer motif (trCLN3) and its lipid derivatives (trCLN3-L4 and trCLN3.mut-L4) were synthesized according to the phosphoramidite protocol using an ABI 3400 synthesizer (Applied Biosystems). DxR-carrying DxR-L4 modified with DMAB and C12-lipid tails as well as the fluorescent-labeled (Atto647N-, Atto550-, and 6FAM) trCLN3-L4 and DxR-L4 motifs were purchased in HPLC purified form from Ella Biotech GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Cell culture and confocal microscopy

The human NSCLC cell line H1838 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cell cultures were tested for mycoplasma contamination by using the PCR-based Venor®GeM Mycoplasma detection kit. Cells were grown in T-75 cm2 flasks using RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cell lines were subcultured twice a week at a ratio of 1:4 depending on the confluence and cell density was determined with a hemocytometer before each experiment. Cells were detached using 1 mL Trypsin-EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by neutralization with 25 mL of RPMI medium and the cells were collected by centrifugation for 5 min at 400 rpm.

In vitro cell imaging of the cell internalization studies were performed using fluorescence microscopy. Prior to each experiment one 70–80% confluent flask was trypsinized and suspended with 10 mL of cell medium. 10 µL of the cell solution was pipetted onto a haemocytometer and the cells were counted. Twenty-four hours prior to the internalization experiments approximately 10,000 NSCLC cells were seeded in 96-well glass bottom multiwell cell culture plates (MatTek® Corporation). The plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 24 h of incubation the cells were first washed with 1× PBS buffer and incubated with various labeled aptameric nanoconstruts (trCLN3-L4, trCLN3.mut-L4, HyApNc-DxR, HyApNc.mut-DxR, or free DxR) in 100 µL of RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS medium containing 1 mM MgCl2 at 37 and 4 °C separately for 2 h. The final concentrations of the labeled micelles were fixed at 10 μM. Afterward, cells were washed with fresh medium and Dulbeccos 1× PBS followed by 10 min fixation with 200 µL of a 3.7% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution in Dulbeccos 1× PBS. Fixed cells were washed with fresh medium and Dulbeccos 1× PBS followed by staining with 200 µL of nuclear and plasma membrane staining reagent [60 µL (1 mg mL−1) of Alexa Fluor 488-WGA and 20 µL of Hoechst 33342 (1 mM) in 4.0 mL in 1× PBS buffer] and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. After 10 min, the labeling solutions were removed and the stained cells were washed with 1× PBS (2 × 200 µL) followed by addition of 200 µL of 1× PBS buffer. Finally, the 96-well plate was mounted with a multi-well plate holder and the confocal imaging of the fixed cells was performed by using a NikonTi-E Eclipse inverted confocal laser-scanning microscope equipped with a 60× Plan Apo VC Oil-immersion DIC N2 objective, a Nikon C2 plus confocal laser scan head and a pinhole of 1.2 airy unit (30 μm). The laser scanning Nikon Confocal Workstation with Galvano scanner, and lasers 408, 488, 561, and 637 nm was used, attached to a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope. Images were captured in 1024 × 1024 pixels format using NIS-Elements software (Nikon Corporation) and the raw images were processed using ImageJ software. The standardized optical setups of imaging, pin-holes, objective, laser power, and photomultiplier gain were kept constant while recording the data for all measurements.

The identity of the cell line was verified based on microsatellite genotyping by the ECACC Cell Line Identity Verification Service. The STR profiles matched the profiles of the cell lines as deposited in the ATCC and ECACC STR databases.

Atomic force microscopy

All AFM images of the trCLN3-L4 and HyApNc aggregates were taken by using a Nanowizard III AFM (JPK Instruments, Berlin) in tapping mode. ACTA probes with silicon tips were used for imaging in dry mode in air. A volume of 3 µL (5 mM) of a solution of magnesium acetate in water was deposited on a freshly cleaved mica surface layer and allowed to incubate for 3 min and afterward the surface was rinsed with 2 × 10 µL of milli-Q water and dried under air pressure. For imaging a volume of 3 µL of the trCLN3-L4/HyApNc solutions in ultra pure water were spotted on the pre-treated mica surface and allowed to incubate for 1 min. After an incubation time of 1 min on the mica surface the excess sample solution was gently shaken off and the mica surface was blown dry with air pressure and mounted to the AFM microscope for immediate imaging. The raw AFM data were processed using the JPK processing software.

TEM analysis

The size and structure of the trCLN3-L4 nanoconstructs were analyzed by negative stain electron microscopy. Samples were prepared using negative staining74. In brief, carbon coated grids (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Jena, Germany, 200 mesh) were glow discharged to render the surface hydrophilic prior to applying samples. 10 µL of an aqueous solution of trCLN3-L4 were applied to the grid. Afterward excess solution was carefully blotted off using filter paper followed by three times washing with ddH2O. In the final step, grids were stained with negative staining reagent by placing them (plastic side down) on a 10 µL drop of freshly prepared 2% (v/v) uranyl formiate aqueous staining solution. TEM micrographs were recorded using a JEOL JEM 2200 FS electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) operated at 200 kV. The size of the micelles measured on the TEM images could typically be observed in a range between 20 and 25 nm.

ESI mass spectrometry

Molecular weights of the trCLN3-L4 and DxR-L4 motifs were analyzed by ESI-LCMS in negative ion mode using a Bruker Esquire HCT 6000 ion-trap MS system with an electrospray ionization source in line with an Agilent 1100 series HPLC system with a ZORBAX SB-18 analytical column (2.1 × 50 mm). An elution buffer (10 mM TEA + 100 mM HFIP) in combination with linear gradients of acetonitrile from 0 to 80% in 30 min was used as mobile phase for analysis. The m/z ratio is calculated by deconvolution of the ionic fragments using Bruker Compass Data Analysis Software.

Serum stability of lipidated and non-lipidated trCLN3 derivatives

Serum stabilities of trCLN3, its two point mutant non-binding variant trCLN3.mut, and their corresponding lipid-functionalized derivatives trCLN3-L4 and trCLN3.mut-L4 were investigated in FCS and HBS. For this purpose, the aptamer motifs were labeled at their 5′-end with 32P to form radiolabeled oligonucleotides. The degradation tests of all the aptamer motifs were performed for 0–72 h at 37 °C. 6 pmol (12 µL of 0.5 μM) of the radio-labeled aptamer (5′-end-labeled with γ-32P) was incubated in a volume of 300 µL freshly thawed PBS-buffered FCS or HBS (270 µL serum + 30 µL 10 × PBS). For each measurement 10 µL of the samples were removed, mixed with 90 µL of gel loading buffer (80% formamide + 5 mM EDTA + 0.01% SDS) and subsequently stored at −20 °C. Aliquots of samples were taken after indicated time intervals of 0, 0.3, 1.5, 3, 6, 24, 48, 60, and 72 h, respectively. The serum stability of the aptamer in FCS or in HBS at different time intervals were analyzed on a denaturing PAGE by loading 10 µL of each sample onto a 10% TAE-Urea gel and running the gels for 90 min at 350 V. Gels were wrapped in clingfilm and exposed to a phosphorimager screen in a closed cassette over a period of 12 h and finally the residual intact aptamer bands were analyzed by scanning the screen in a phosphorimage-scanner (FujiFilm FLA 3000). Intensities of the residual intact aptamer bands were calculated applying AIDA image analyzer software program. Serums half-lives of the selected aptamers were determined by using a half-life curve-fitting data analysis program (GraphPad Prism).

Assembly of trCLN3-L4 and HyApNc nanoconstructs

The assembly of both the homogeneous nanoconstructs and hybrid micellar nanoconstructs (HyApNc) in aqueous solution, induced by microphase separation, with an outer shell of aptameric DNA and an inner core of the hydrophobic lipids was performed by employing a simple heating and cooling procedure. An aqueous solution of 250 pmol of trCLN3-L4 was added to 250 pmol of DxR-L4 motif dissolved in a volume of 50 µL milli-Q H2O (10 μM solution). The resulting solution was heated to 90 °C for 10 min and subsequently cooled down to a temperature of 10 °C at a rate of 1 °C per 10 min. In case of the aptamers functionalized with fluorescent markers, the solutions were heated up to 70 °C instead of 90 °C and then gradually cooled down to a temperature of 10 °C at a rate of 1 °C per 10 min using a thermocycler.

Loading HyApNc carrier with DxR

DxR-loaded hybrid-aptameric nanoconstruct (HyApNc-DxR) was prepared by mixing trCLN3-L4 3 with DxR-L4 4 motif in 1:1 ratio with a 10-fold excess of DxR in binding buffer (1× PBS + 1 mM MgCl2). The solution was incubated at 90 °C for 10 min and slowly cooled down to room temperature overnight at a rate of 1 °C per 10 min in order to intercalate DxR into the DxR-L4 motif. The DxR-loaded HyApNc was transferred to an Amicon Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter column with 3 K molecular weight cutoff and excess of free DxR which is not intercalated into DxR-L4 motif was removed by three times consecutive centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at room temperature while adding fresh binding buffer at each centrifugation step. After each centrifugation step, a UV/vis spectrum of the flow through washing was recorded and a reduction in DxR absorbance further confirmed the successive removal of excess DxR through repeated washing.

Cell viability assay

To assess the cytotoxicity of free DxR and HyApNc-DxR in NCI-H1838 lung cancer cells, first the H1838 cells (2 × 104 cells per well) were seeded in a 96-well plate and grown for 24 h. The cells were then washed with 1× PBS (200 µL) and subsequently treated with free DxR (as control), HyApNc-DxR, or HyApNc.mut-DxR in a dose-dependent way with a final DxR concentration ranging from 0.125 to 50 µM per well. After 2 h post treatment, the cells were washed; the RPMI medium was replaced with a fresh RPMI medium, and subsequently either irradiated with UV light for 5 min (λ = 365 nm; 350 mW cm−2), or not irradiated. Afterward the cells were incubated for another 24 h at 37 °C.

For time-dependent cytotoxicity assays, cells were grown at different seeding densities of 10,000, 15,000, 20,000, and 30,000 cells/well in a 96-well plate for 24 h. The cells were then washed with 1× PBS and subsequently incubated with unloaded HyApNc, HyApNc-DxR, and HyApNpw/oAz-DxR, respectively, with a final DxR concentration of 8 μM in the culture medium. After 2 h post treatment, the cells were washed; the RPMI medium was replaced with fresh RPMI medium, and subsequently either irradiated with UV light for 5 min (λ = 365 nm; 350 mW cm−2), or not irradiated. Then the cells are allowed to culture for another 8, 24, or 48 h, respectively.

Then for both experiments, 15 µL of an MTT stock solution (5 mg mL−1) was added to each well and the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 6 h. After 6 h post treatment with MTT solutions, 100 µL of the SDS-HCL solution was added to each well and mixed thoroughly with a pipette and incubated at 37 °C for an additional 12 h. Finally, the absorbance was measured at λ = 570 nm by using a Tecan Infinite® M1000 PRO microplate reader.

Data availability

The data sets within the article and supplementary files generated during the current study are available from the authors upon request.


  1. Farokhzad, O. C. et al. Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6315–6320 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Keefe, A. D., Pai, S. & Ellington, A. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 537–550 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Y., Hong, H. & Cai, W. Tumor-targeted drug delivery with aptamers. Curr. Med. Chem. 1, 4185–4194 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer, C., Hahn, U. & Rentmeister, A. Cell-specific aptamers as emerging therapeutics. J. Nucleic Acids 904750, 1–18 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, H. et al. Oligonucleotide aptamers: new tools for targeted cancer therapy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, 1–14 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song, L. et al. Efficient, pH-triggered drug delivery using a pH-responsive DNA-conjugated gold nanoparticle. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 275–280 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, J. et al. Nucleolin targeting AS1411 aptamer modified pH-sensitive micelles for enhanced delivery and antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel. Nano Res. 8, 201–208 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou, C. et al. Aptamer CaCO3 nanostructures: a facile, pH-responsive, specific platform for targeted anticancer theranostics. Chem. Asian J. 10, 166–171 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, F. et al. Light-responsive and pH-responsive DNA microcapsules for controlled release of loads. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8936–8945 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, X. et al. Near-infrared light-triggered, targeted drug delivery to cancer cells by aptamer gated nanovehicles. Adv. Mater. 24, 2890–2895 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, L. et al. Aptamer photoregulation in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17099–17103 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang, Y. et al. An aptamer-targeting photoresponsive drug delivery system using “off-on” graphene oxide wrapped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale 7, 6304–6310 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Özalp, V. C. & Schäfer, T. Aptamer-based switchable nanovalves for stimuli-responsive drug delivery. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 9893–9896 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mo, R., Jiang, T., DiSanto, R., Tai, W. & Gu, Z. ATP-triggered anticancer drug delivery. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun, W. et al. Cocoon-like self-degradable DNA nanoclew for anticancer drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14722–14725 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831–834 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zadegan, R. M. et al. Construction of a 4 zeptoliters switchable 3D DNA box origami. ACS Nano 6, 10050–10053 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lupold, E. S., Hicke, J. B., Lin, Y. & Coffey, S. D. Identification and characterization of nuclease-stabilized RNA molecules that bind human prostate cancer cells via the prostate-specific membrane antigen. Cancer Res. 62, 4029–4033 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dassie, J. P. et al. Systemic administration of optimized aptamer-siRNA chimeras promotes regression of PSMA-expressing tumors. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 839–849 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dassie, J. P. et al. Targeted inhibition of prostate cancer metastases with an RNA aptamer to prostate-specific membrane antigen. Mol. Ther. 22, 1910–1922 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ray, P. et al. Aptamer-mediated delivery of chemotherapy to pancreatic cancer cells. Nucleic Acid Ther. 5, 295–305 (2012).

  22. Dua, P. et al. Alkaline phosphatase ALPPL-2 is a novel pancreatic carcinoma-associated protein. Cancer Res. 73, 1934–1945 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, Y. J. et al. An RNA aptamer that binds carcinoembryonic antigen inhibits hepatic metastasis of colon cancer cells in mice. Gastroenterology 143, 155–165 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, X. et al. Evolution of DNA aptamers through in vitro metastatic-cell-based systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment for metastatic cancer recognition and imaging. Anal. Chem. 87, 4941–4948 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, M. Y. & Jeong, S. In vitro selection of RNA aptamer and specific targeting of ErbB2 in breast cancer cells. Nucleic Acid Ther. 21, 173–178 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thiel, K. W. et al. Delivery of chemo-sensitizing siRNAs to HER2+-breast cancer cells using RNA aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6319–6337 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li, X. L. et al. In vitro selection of DNA aptamers for metastatic breast cancer cell recognition and tissue imaging. Anal. Chem. 86, 6596–6603 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dhar, S., Gu, F. X., Langer, R., Farokhzad, O. C. & Lippard, S. J. Targeted delivery of cisplatin to prostate cancer cells by aptamer functionalized Pt(IV) prodrug-PLGA-PEG nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17356–17361 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Alemdaroglu, F. E., Alemdaroglu, N. C., Langguth, P. & Herrmann, A. DNA block copolymer micelles—a combinatorial tool for cancer nanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 20, 899–902 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao, Z. et al. Reversible cell-specific drug delivery with aptamer-functionalized liposomes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6494–6498 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mann, A. P. et al. Thioaptamer conjugated liposomes for tumor vasculature targeting. Oncotarget 2, 298–304 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Xing, H. et al. Selective delivery of an anticancer drug with aptamer-functionalized liposomes to breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med. 1, 5288–5297 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Alshaer, W., Hillaireau, H., Vergnaud, J., Ismail, S. & Fattal, E. Functionalizing liposomes with anti-CD44 aptamer for selective targeting of cancer cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 26, 1307–1313 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, Y. F. et al. Molecular assembly of an aptamer-drug conjugate for targeted drug delivery to tumor cells. ChemBioChem 10, 862–868 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, Z. et al. Novel HER2 aptamer selectively delivers cytotoxic drug to HER2-positive breast cancer cells in vitro. J. Transl. Med. 10, 1–10 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu, G., Niu, G. & Chen, X. Aptamer-drug conjugates. Bioconjugate Chem. 26, 2186–2197 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stecker, J. R., Savage, A. A., Bruno, J. G., García, D. M. & Koke, J. R. Dynamics and visualization of MCF7 adenocarcinoma cell death by aptamer-C1q-mediated membrane attack. Nucleic Acid Ther. 22, 275–282 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang, S. & Hah, S. S. Improved ligand binding by antibody-aptamer pincers. Bioconjugate Chem. 25, 1421–1427 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bagalkot, V. et al. Quantum dot-aptamer conjugates for synchronous cancer imaging, therapy, and sensing of drug delivery based on bi-fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nano Lett. 10, 3065–3070 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, F. B. et al. Recognition and capture of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cells using aptamer-conjugated quantum dots and magnetic particles. Biomaterials 34, 3816–3827 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, Z., Ma, Q., Fei, X., Zhang, H. & Su, X. A novel aptamer functionalized CuInS2 quantum dots probe for daunorubicin sensing and near infrared imaging of prostate cancer cells. Anal. Chim. Acta 818, 54–60 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bagalkot, V., Farokhzad, O. C., Langer, R. & Jon, S. An aptamer-doxorubicin physical conjugate as a novel targeted drug-delivery platform. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 8149–8152 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meng, L. et al. Targeted delivery of chemotherapy agents using a liver cancer-specific aptamer. PLoS ONE 7, e33434 1–8 (2012).

  44. Liu, J. et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery to circumvent cancer resistance. Biomaterials 91, 44–56 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boltz, A. et al. Bi-specific aptamers mediating tumor cell lysis. J. Biol. Chem. 24, 21896–21905 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sierra, J. R. & Tsao, M. S. c-MET as a potential therapeutic target and biomarker in cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 3, S21–S35 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Allen, T. M. Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 750–763 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peer, D. et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–760 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Luo, D., Carter, K. A., Miranda, D. & Lovell, J. F. Chemophototherapy: an emerging treatment option for solid tumors. Adv. Sci. 4, 1–24 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, H., Prasad, G., Buolamwini, J. K. & Zhang, R. Antisense anticancer oligonucleotide therapeutics. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 1, 177–196 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Crooke, S. T. Antisense strategies. Curr. Mol. Med. 4, 465–487 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tong, R., Chiang, H. H. & Kohane, D. S. Photoswitchable nanoparticles for in vivo cancer chemotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19048–19053 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Carter, K. A. et al. Porphyrin–phospholipid liposomes permeabilized by near-infrared light. Nat. Commun. 5, 3546 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Asanuma, H. et al. Synthesis of azobenzene-tethered DNA for reversible photo-regulation of DNA functions: hybridization and transcription. Nat. Protoc. 2, 203–212 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nishioka, H., Liang, X., Kashida, H. & Asanuma, H. 2′,6′-Dimethylazobenzene as an efficient and thermo-stable photo-regulator for the photoregulation of DNA hybridization. Chem. Commun. 14, 4353–4356 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. Caged compounds: photorelease technology for control of cellular chemistry and physiology. Nat. Methods 4, 619–628 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu, Q. & Deiters, A. Optochemical control of deoxyoligonucleotide function via a nucleobase-caging approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 45–55 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shestopalov, I. A., Sinha, S. & Chen, J. K. Light-controlled gene silencing in zebrafish embryos. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 650–651 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lohmann, F., Ackermann, D. & Famulok, M. Reversible light switch for macrocycle mobility in a DNA rotaxane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 11884–11887 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Lohmann, F., Weigandt, J., Valero, J. & Famulok, M. Logic gating by macrocycle displacement using a double-stranded DNA [3]rotaxane shuttle. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 10372–10376 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Nishioka, H., Liang, X., Kato, T. & Asanuma, H. A photon-fueled DNA nanodevice that contains two different photoswitches. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1165–1168 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Vinkenborg, J. L., Mayer, G. & Famulok, M. Aptamer-based affinity labeling of proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36, 9176–9180 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Puri, N. & Salgia, R. Synergism of EGFR and c-Met pathways, cross-talk and inhibition, in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Carcinog. 7, 1–8 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Matsubara, D. et al. Molecular predictors of sensitivity to the MET inhibitor PHA665752 in lung carcinoma cells. J. Thorac. Oncol. 5, 1317–1324 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Owen, S. C., Chan, P. Y. & Shoichet, S. M. Polymeric micelle stability. Nano Today 7, 53–65 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Morton, S. W., Zhao, X., Quadir, M. A. & Hammond, P. T. FRET-enabled biological characterization of polymeric micelles. Biomaterials 35, 3489–3496 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang, X. et al. PEGylated poly(amine-co-ester) micelles as biodegradable non-viral gene vectors with enhanced stability, reduced toxicity and higher in vivo transfection efficacy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 4034–4044 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Stuart, C. H. et al. Site-specific DNA−doxorubicin conjugates display enhanced cytotoxicity to breast cancer cells. Bioconjugate Chem. 25, 406–413 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kastantin, M. et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic stability of DSPE-PEG(2000) micelles in the presence of bovine serum albumin. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 12632–12640 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dong, H. et al. 3-Helix micelles stabilized by polymer springs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 11807–11814 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Brickman, M. J., Cook, M. & Balber, A. E. Low temperature reversibly inhibits transport from tubular endosomes to a perinuclear, acidic compartment in African trypanosomes. J. Cell Sci. 108, 3611–3621 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Feige, J. N., Sage, D., Wahli, W., Desvergne, B. & Gelman, L. PixFRET, an ImageJ plug-in for FRET calculation that can accommodate variations in spectral bleed-throughs. Microsc. Res. Tech. 68, 51–58 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Samanta, S. et al. Photoswitching Azo compounds in vivo with red light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9777–9784 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Carlo, D. S. & Harris, J. R. Negative staining and Cryo-negative Staining of macromolecules and viruses for TEM. Micron 42, 117–131 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge financial support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the European Research Council (ERC Advanced Grant). We thank N.S. Hamedani for providing fresh Human Blood Serum, and A. Schmitz, H. Beckert, Y. Aschenbach-Paul, and T. Hornung for help, discussions, and critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.P., V.A. and M.F. conceived and designed the experiments, D.P. and V.A. performed all the chemical/oligo synthesis, confocal imaging, and cell-based experiments. R.Z. performed the FTRET studies and FRET efficiency data analysis. S.I. performed TEM imaging. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscripts, D.P. and M.F. wrote the manuscript, and M.F. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Famulok.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.P., V.A., S.I., and M.F declare competing financial interests: a patent application on this work has been submitted and the patent has been licensed by Caris Life Sciences. The remaining author declares no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prusty, D.K., Adam, V., Zadegan, R.M. et al. Supramolecular aptamer nano-constructs for receptor-mediated targeting and light-triggered release of chemotherapeutics into cancer cells. Nat Commun 9, 535 (2018).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing