The biomechanical and ecophysiological properties of plant seed/fruit structures are fundamental to survival in distinct environments. Dispersal of fruits with hard pericarps (fruit coats) encasing seeds has evolved many times independently within taxa that have seed dispersal as their default strategy. The mechanisms by which the constraint of a hard pericarp determines germination timing in response to the environment are currently unknown. Here, we show that the hard pericarp of Lepidium didymum controls germination solely by a biomechanical mechanism. Mechanical dormancy is conferred by preventing full phase-II water uptake of the encased non-dormant seed. The lignified endocarp has biomechanically and morphologically distinct regions that serve as predetermined breaking zones. This pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy is released by the activity of common fungi, which weaken these zones by degrading non-lignified pericarp cells. We propose that the hard pericarp with this biomechanical mechanism contributed to the global distribution of this species in distinct environments.
A diversity of fruit and seed structures provide biomechanical and ecophysiological adaptations to support reproductive performance and plant fitness in distinct environments1,2,3,4,5. ‘Hard Seededness’ has arisen many times across plant taxons whereby a hard inner layer of the pericarp (fruit coat) encases the seed. The means by which hard endocarps open during germination were first investigated in 1933 by Sir Arthur Hill, Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens (Kew, London). Hill6 and others7 found Eocene fossil fruit valves with a hard endocarp. Global climate change processes in the Eocene were identified as the primary selective agents for physical dormancy characterised by water-impermeable hard seed or fruit coats2, 3, 8. However, most hard-seeded species have physiological dormancy (PD) with water-permeable seed or fruit coats9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Seven major dormancy classes, with physical dormancy the most restricted and PD the most common, have been proposed by seed ecologists3, 16.
Dormancy is an innate seed/fruit property that defines the environmental conditions required for germination3, 5, 16. The environmental sensitivity provided by PD appears to be a key trait in the diversification of seed plants. Willis et al.16, proposed from their phylogenetic analysis, that PD acted as an ‘evolutionary hub’ from which other dormancy classes evolved. This also includes the non-dormancy (ND) class, which enables seedling establishment as soon as conditions become favourable for germination. Species with ND seeds might be better able to explore novel environments because their germination is independent of specific dormancy-breaking cues that might be absent in that new environment16. Diversification and global radiation of the Brassicaceae in the Miocene was associated with the evolution of distinct seed and fruit traits10, 12,13,14, 17,18,19. Dispersal of PD or ND seeds from dehiscent fruits is the ancestral condition of the Brassicaceae genus Lepidium, comprising ∼250 species. The dispersal of indehiscent and didymous-type fruits evolved independently several times within this genus18, 20,21,22,23. Lepidium is therefore highly suited for study of the biomechanics and ecophysiology of pericarp traits in seed protection and dispersal strategies.
Here, we elucidate the biomechanical and ecophysiological mechanisms underpinning the mechanical dormancy imposed by the hard pericarp of Lepidium didymum L. (syn: Coronopus didymus (L.) Smith) fruit valves. L. didymum is a successful weed of South American origin widely distributed over all continents, from the boreal to the tropical climatic zones18, 23 (Supplementary Fig. 1). It is a problematic weed in agricultural ecosystems including in dairy farming where it causes off-flavoured milk24 and forms abundant and persistent weed seed banks in arable soil and grassland25,26,27,28,29,30. We report here that the L. didymum didymous fruit valve evolved to have a structure that prevents full water uptake of the encased ND seed. This solely mechanical mechanism consists of a hard endocarp with a ‘Predetermined Breaking Zone’ (PBZ) and a distinct crack initiation zone. To release the pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy and trigger germination, the PBZ is weakened in its biomechanical properties by the activity of fruit-associated common fungi.
Pericarp-imposed mechanical constraint to seed germination
We found that the hard pericarp of the L. didymum fruit valve imposes a mechanical constraint to the germination of the encased seeds. The dispersal units of L. didymum are hard fruit valves with a didymous fruit morphology18, 23 (Fig. 1). The dispersed fruit valve has a thick, hard pericarp encasing a single seed. Inside the fruit valve cavity, the seed is always oriented so its radicle (embryonic root) end is adjacent to the distal pericarp, while the peripheral end of the seed is adjacent to the proximal pericarp (Fig. 1b, c). The hard pericarp does not completely isolate the seed from the ambient environment due to a ‘Natural Pericarp Opening’ (NPO); a small hole in the pericarp surrounded by the scar of the detachment zone (Fig. 1b, c). It is therefore obvious that water uptake by the seed inside the fruit valve is potentially possible via the NPO without the requirement for a change in pericarp permeability, but the NPO is too small to release of the seed from the fruit valve. It takes several weeks until the fruit valve eventually cracks open to facilitate radicle emergence (Fig. 1d, e). The radicle emergence does not occur via the NPO, but is localised to the distal pericarp region adjacent to the NPO. The shell-like fruit valve opening occurs by pericarp rupture, which starts in the distal pericarp (crack initiation zone) from where it propagates along the distal and dorsal region. Using biomechanical and microscopic analysis, described later, we identified this region as PBZ for pericarp rupture.
Fruit valve germination of L. didymum is a slow process spread over weeks or months, but ‘extracted seeds’ (seeds manually extracted from fruit valves) germinated readily within a few days (Fig. 2a, c, d). To investigate if this pericarp-mediated germination constraint is due to a biomechanical mechanism, we compared these temporal patterns to the germination of scarified fruit valves. Mechanical scarification of fruit valves by pericarp cracking provided artificial pericarp rupture. The germination experiments demonstrated that scarification shifts the onset of visible germination of surface-sterilised fruit valve populations from ~120 days to ~10 days, and the time to reach 50% from ~240 days to ~15 days (Fig. 2a). The similarity in germination timing of the scarified fruit valves and the extracted seeds, as compared to the inhibited germination of intact fruit valves, excludes pericarp-released germination inhibitors (chemical dormancy)3, 5 as the cause for the pericarp-mediated constraint.
We show here that the pericarp permits partial water uptake by seeds and testa rupture inside fruit valves, but prevents full water uptake required for germination of ND seeds. The completion of germination by radicle protrusion depends on the balance of forces between the growth potential of the embryo (expansion force driven by water uptake) and the weakening of the ‘coat’ constraints2, 5. To further investigate the mechanisms of the L. didymum pericarp constraints therefore required that we characterised the dormancy and germination properties of extracted seeds. Their germination occurred with two visible rupture steps; testa rupture, followed by endosperm rupture and radicle emergence (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 2a–d). This germination pattern is typical of seeds dispersed from the dehiscent fruits of Lepidium sativum (ND seeds)21 and Lepidium papillosum (PD seeds)22. For the extracted seeds of L. didymum accession KM2423 (from Northern Germany) we identified a wide optimal temperature window from 8 to 21 °C and that 15/5 °C (day/night) was optimal for seed germination (‘standard condition’, Supplementary Fig. 2e). The wide temperature optimum and preference for cooler temperatures is in agreement with the observed seedling emergence patterns during mild winters in Northern Germany30 and across seasons in England26. The extracted seeds from freshly harvested mature fruit valves of ten independent L. didymum accessions (Supplementary Table 1) readily germinated under our standard conditions (Supplementary Fig. 2b). This was well in advance of their fruit valve germination confirming the importance of the pericarp constraint.
To investigate how the hard pericarp imposes a mechanical constraint to the germination of the encased seeds we compared the water uptake by extracted seeds to seeds inside fruit valves (Fig. 2b). This comparison revealed that the hard pericarp is a mechanical constraint and only permits initial (imbibition) and partial phase-II water uptake into seeds inside fruit valves, but prevented the transition to phase-III water uptake required for endosperm rupture and radicle emergence5. Interestingly, despite the mechanical constraint preventing full water uptake by the seeds, testa rupture of seeds occurred inside the fruit valves (Fig. 2a, b, e, Supplementary Fig. 4a). This occurred well in advance of the onset of any fruit valve germination, at ~120 days (Fig. 2a). At ~60 days 100% of the seeds inside the fruit valves had testa rupture but none had endosperm rupture (Fig. 2b). Prior to pericarp rupture the water content of seeds within fruit valves remained roughly constant at the low phase-II level, and increased only upon pericarp rupture and radicle emergence (Fig. 2b). Taken together, we conclude that L. didymum fruit valves harbour ND seeds and that the hard pericarp imposes a mechanical constraint to the full phase-II water uptake of these ND seeds, delaying germination by pericarp rupture for several months (Fig. 2a).
Fungi promote pericarp rupture
In contrast to surface-sterilised fruit valve populations where the onset of pericarp rupture is at ~120 days, untreated fruit valves exhibited a substantially earlier onset at ~35 days (Fig. 3a). Not only the onset, but also the rate of pericarp rupture was enhanced in the untreated fruit valve populations. This reduced the variability in germination timing (4–8 months) to a more uniform germination within 1–2 months. In contrast to the fruit valves, no appreciable effect of the surface sterilisation was evident for the germination kinetics of extracted seeds (Fig. 3a). The finding that the pericarp rupture of untreated, compared to surface-sterilised fruit valves was promoted, while the germination of extracted seeds was not, was evident in ten independent accessions from Europe, Africa and Australia (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Fig. 3).
The L. didymum fruit valve pericarp is organised in layers, with the outer pericarp layers (exocarp and mesocarp) covering the inner endocarp layer (Figs. 1c, 4a). The outer pericarp layers comprise living parenchymatic cells with primary cell walls, while the hard endocarp constitutes a layer of dead cells with thick and lignified cell walls (Fig. 4a). Microscopy of untreated fruit valves revealed that the promotion of pericarp rupture (Fig. 3a) was associated with fungal colonisation of the outer pericarp (Fig. 4). Fungal hyphae were first visible after a few days of fruit valve imbibition, and after 14 and 35 days the entire outer pericarp was colonised by fungal hyphae (Fig. 4c, d). This fungal colonisation did not impair germination, seed viability, and the development of healthy seedlings (Supplementary Fig. 2). Re-inoculation of surface-sterilised fruit valves with the fungi also led to the promotion of pericarp rupture (Fig. 3a). The promotion of pericarp rupture by fungi was neither associated with increased phase-II seed water contents inside fruit valves nor with directly enhancing embryo growth, but it triggered earlier pericarp rupture associated with earlier phase-III water uptake and the completion of fruit valve germination (Supplementary Fig. 4). As this fungal colonisation was also observed on fruit valves harvested directly from the mother plant, we conclude that the promotion of pericarp rupture seems to be achieved by the activity of fruit-associated fungi. To reveal the mechanisms by which the fungal activity releases the pericarp-imposed mechanical constraint we applied microscopic and biomechanical methods.
Fungi selectively weaken the distal region of the PBZ
Our finding that the pericarp acts by mechanically preventing full water uptake required for the completion of seed germination (Fig. 2b) suggested that the promotion of fruit valve germination by the fruit-associated fungi (Fig. 3) is achieved by targeted fungal erosion of pericarp tissue to lower its mechanical resistance. To investigate the underpinning biomechanical mechanisms and if the fungal activity indeed lowered mechanical resistance we performed puncture force measurements on different regions of the fruit valve. Figure 5a shows that the breaking strength of the distal pericarp region dropped drastically from 2.6 ± 0.1 N to 1.2 ± 0.1 N after 35 days of incubation with fungi. In contrast to this force decrease by ~52% from the initial (day 0) puncture force value, no alteration in the mechanical resistance of the distal pericarp region was evident without fungi (Fig. 5a). The proximal (Fig. 5a) and dorsal (Supplementary Fig. 5) pericarp regions were also affected significantly by the fungi, but to a lesser degree. The force decrease with fungi was only ~30%, with no alteration in the mechanical resistance evident without fungi.
Consistent with a decrease in the mechanical resistance by fungal activity, we found that fungal colonisation indeed eroded the pericarp (Fig. 4e, f). After only 1 week of incubation with fungi, the living, non-lignified exocarp and mesocarp layers were almost completely degraded (Fig. 4f, g), while they remained intact without fungi (Fig. 4a, e). Figure 4f, g also show that neither the testa of the seeds nor the dead lignified endocarp exhibited visible degradation by the fungal activity. To provide direct evidence with a ʻno fungi’ method that the removal of the outer pericarp layers (exocarp and mesocarp) alone is sufficient for the release of the mechanical pericarp dormancy, we conducted abrasion experiments with surface-sterilised fruits. Figure 4h shows that specific removal of the distal outer pericarp layers by abrasion can fully replace the fungal activity to release the mechanical pericarp dormancy and to promote fruit germination. In contrast to this, specific abrasion of the proximal outer pericarp layers did not lead to dormancy release. In the abrasion experiments where the outer pericarp was removed, the endocarp remained intact (Supplementary Fig. 6). We conclude that the observed degradation of the distal outer pericarp material by fungal activity (Fig. 4g) as well as its specific artificial removal (Fig. 4h) are consistent with the decrease in the mechanical resistance (Fig. 5) and sufficient to promote fruit valve germination (Fig. 3a). The reduction in mechanical resistance caused by fungal activity was far more pronounced in the distal, compared to the proximal and dorsal pericarp regions. Together with the finding that abrasion of the distal (and not the proximal) outer pericarp, promotes pericarp rupture, this strongly suggests that a distinct biomechanical structure may cause a specific weakening of the distal PBZ region where the radicle emerges.
Biomechanical and morphological fruit valve properties
To investigate spatial differences suitable to explain the mechanisms of pericarp rupture along the PBZ, and to reveal targets for the release of the pericarp-imposed dormancy by fungal activity, we focused on an enhanced biomechanical and microscopy analyses of fruit valve regions. Figure 5b shows the distal and proximal regions of the pericarp have very distinct patterns in their force–displacement curves. At the distal pericarp region, the force increased with displacement up to a maximum value at which a sudden, complete, failure led to a force drop to almost zero. This consistent breaking behaviour (fatal ‘brittle’ failure)2, 31 indicates a specialised underlying morphology. Microscopy and biomechanics identifies this distal region as the PBZ crack initiation zone (iPBZ) for pericarp rupture, which, upon mechanical failure causes the fruit valve to split into halves, in the manner observed during germination (Fig. 1d, e). In contrast to the distal region, the proximal pericarp region showed a totally different mechanical behaviour (Fig. 5b). After a critical value was reached, the force dropped gradually in several steps (slow ‘composite’ failure creating a typical ‘zig-zag’ pattern)2, 31. The distinct curves observed for the two pericarp regions suggest differences in their functional morphology indicating their different roles during pericarp rupture.
The morphological structures and cellular properties underpinning the distinct biomechanical behaviours are shown Fig. 6. Pericarp rupture always starts in the distal pericarp, adjacent to where the radicle is localised. From there it progresses along the PBZ in the distal and dorsal pericarp regions. The pericarp rupture leaves a smooth breaking edge along the PBZ (Fig. 6c–f). In the dorsal PBZ and distal NPO regions rather regular and long endocarp cells are running in parallel (Fig. 6c, e, f). In contrast to this, the proximal NPO region (which does not rupture) is characterised by shorter endocarp cells, organised in a more disordered and interwoven formation (Fig. 6g, h). The longitudinal section of the fruit valve pericarp (Fig. 4a) and the close-up view of the distal pericarp (Fig. 6i) reveal that the distal PBZ endocarp where the pericarp rupture starts (iPBZ) is indeed distinct. The endocarp cells in the distal iPBZ endocarp have a highly regular and parallel orientation, distinct from the adjacent and the proximal endocarp (Figs. 4a, 6i). The distal iPBZ endocarp cells are significantly less lignified compared to the cells of other endocarp regions (Fig. 6 i, k), and its endocarp cell walls contain distinct glycoprotein or hemicellulose epitops (Fig. 6j). In summary, the evolution of the L. didymum fruit valve has resulted in morphologically and micromechanically distinct regions as targets for the release of pericarp-imposed dormancy by fungal activity, which decreases mechanical resistance.
Identification of fruit-associated fungi
To identify the fungal species promoting pericarp rupture by the degradation of the outer pericarp, we used a universal DNA barcode marker method for distinguishing species of the fungal lineages (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, early dividing lineages)32. Our analysis identified five to six common Ascomycota fungi to constitute the L. didymum fruit-valve community (Table 1). These ascomycetes, especially Cladosporium sphaerospermum and Aureobasidium pullans, are among the most common and widespread fungi in soil and air33,34,35,36. They are globally distributed in soils of almost all continents and climatic zones (Supplementary Fig. 7). They are also known as seed-borne plant epiphytes and endophytes with proposed roles in seed/fruit traits15, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46. Seed/fruit microbiomes are composed mainly of Dothideomycetes 38, which is also the case for the L. didymum fruit valve common ascomycete community (Table 1). Cooperation between the seed-borne microbes is frequent and often leads to protecting germinating seeds and emerging seedlings against abiotic stresses (heat, drought), herbivory and pathogen attack34, 38, 40, 43, 44. C. sphaerospermum is known as a gibberellin-producing seedling endophyte of soybean45 and vertical transmission of C. sphaerospermum and Alternaria alternata via seeds is widespread in herbaceous plants39. A. pullans is the dominant endophyte of bean seeds and seedlings41 and an antagonist of pathogenic fungi in post-harvest diseases34. Several Penicillium species including Penicillium brevicompactum and Penicillium olsonii were identified as seed-borne endophytes15, 37, 42, 43, but without revealing the underpinning mechanisms.
Figure 4f shows that the L. didymum fruit-valve ascomycetes degraded the outer pericarp without visibly affecting the lignified endocarp. Additional to no lignin degradation, we did not identify any white-rot basidiomycetes. The identified ascomycetes are however known to contribute to the enzymatic degradation of other plant cell wall components. C. sphaerospermum, A. pullulans, as well as several Alternaria and Penicillium species produce various cell wall degrading enzymes including cellulases, xylanases, mannanases, arabinases and pectinases34, 47, 48. Taken together, this is consistent with our findings that the identified common ascomycetes (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 7) can degrade exocarp and mesocarp primary cell walls (Fig. 4f) to release the pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy and promote germination and seedling emergence of L. didymum.
The L. didymum system revealed that mechanical dormancy imposed by a hard pericarp and its release by the activity of common fungi depend on the fruit valve morphology. The default reproductive strategy within the genus Lepidium are dehiscent fruits that open to disperse ND or PD seeds18, 20,21,22, but L. didymum has evolved didymous-type fruit valves for which we have unravelled the underpinning mechanism. The mechanism by which the hard endocarp inhibits the germination of the encased ND seed is that it imposes a mechanical constraint to full water uptake by the seed required for the completion of germination. Even under our experimental conditions with maximal and continuous water availability, which is not the case in nature, this inhibits fruit valve germination for at least 4–8 months and distributes the germination of the population over many months. The pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy therefore spreads germination and seedling establishment over and beyond the actual growing season, and explains a key aspect of the observed emergence phenology of L. didymum 26, 28. The pericarp-imposed constraint of L. didymum fruit valves to full phase-II water uptake of the encased ND seeds is clearly distinct from seeds were imbibition is completely blocked by water-impermeable seed or fruit coats3, 8. Hard endocarps mechanically restricting full water uptake have also been described for (closed) indehiscent fruits with water-permeable pericarps9,10,11,12,13,14, 49. From this work, roles for the hard pericarps were proposed including additional seed protection by reducing hydration and dehydration rates, increasing persistence in soil by retaining seed viability during wet-dry cycles, mechanically enhancing the seed’s PD to spread germination and seedling emergence further over an extended period of time (months and years). In neither of these cases were the underpinning biomechanical mechanisms of the pericarp-imposed constraints and their release studied.
The mechanism by which the pericarp-mediated mechanical dormancy is released by the activity of common ascomycetes to promote germination is based on the adaptive biomechanical and morphological properties of the L. didymum fruit valve. The outer pericarp layers consist of living parenchymatic cells with primary cell walls, while the hard endocarp is a dead layer consisting of cells with thick and heavily lignified secondary cell walls. We identified regions within the pericarp with distinct properties consistent with their roles and mechanisms during dormancy release and germination. We identified the PBZ in the distal and dorsal pericarp, and the crack initiation zone (iPBZ) in the distal pericarp region adjacent to the seed’s radicle end. Pericarp rupture is initiated at the iPBZ and the PBZ guides its propagation in an ‘opening fracture mode’31 along the distal and dorsal pericarp. This role is supported by the parallel orientation of their thick-walled, lignified, endocarp cells and its biomechanical fracture behaviour by fatal ‘brittle’ failure2, 31 (Fig. 5). The notch-like shape of the distal endocarp results in higher localised stress upon embryo expansion. In contrast, the proximal pericarp region adjacent to the round cotyledon end of the seed is distinct in shape and does not play a role as part of the PBZ. It also has a more disordered and interwoven pattern of its thick-walled, lignified endocarp cells and a slower ‘composite’ failure breaking behaviour. A predetermined breaking point as an adaptation to a dynamic environment has also been identified in the basal stem section of aquatic plants50. Morphological and biomechanical properties of plant dispersal units constitute fundamental traits of adaptive value to ensure survival in response to prevailing abiotic and biotic environmental factors1, 3, 4.
Considering the relevance of this fruit fracture biomechanics and the global activity of common ascomycetes in a germination ecological context is important for such a system. For the cosmopolitan weed L. didymum, pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy determines the timing of fruit valve germination and therefore any subsequent life history success including for colonisation, establishment and reproduction. Any abiotic (soil moisture and temperature) and biotic (common ascomycete activity) environmental factor must therefore be present and operate appropriately to explain the observed germination responses and emergence patterns of L. didymum in the diversity of its climates and habitats. The world-wide distribution of L. didymum (Supplementary Fig. 1) coincides with the world-wide distribution of the identified common ascomycetes (Supplementary Fig. 7). The identified fruit-valve ascomycetes, especially C. sphaerospermum and A. pullans, are indeed among the most common and widespread fungi33,34,35,36, and are known as seed-borne epiphytes and endophytes15, 37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44, 46, and are in general mutualists or commensalists in soil and are associated with a wide range of plants.
For the identified common ascomycetes to serve as a biotic environmental factor, their pericarp-degrading activity should relate to the operating post-dispersal germination strategy and observed seedling emergence patterns. A soil seed bank persistence of at 5–10 years was determined for L. didymum fruit valves26, 28, and in a burial experiment with 70 species it ranked among the top three for appreciable numbers of seedlings emerging in the fourth and fifth year26, 28. The germination strategy of L. didymum is characterised by spreading seedling emergence over the entire growing season with a tendency in spring and autumn24,25,26. The observed seasonal dynamics and soil moisture dependence of fungal communities34, 36 would resultant in patterns in fungal activity (cell-wall degrading enzymes), which support such a temporal spread of L. didymum seedling emergence. Further to this, L. didymum is a pioneer species that reacts within weeks, with seedling emergence, to mechanical soil disturbance (e.g. gap formation, crop planting)27, 29, 30. The fast seedling flush response upon mechanical soil disturbance27, 29, 30 connects well with work on different tillage management practices on soil fungal communities in agroecosystems33. Tillage is known to increase the abundance of Cladosporium, Penicillium and Aureobasidium and other ascomycetes in soil33 and the increased fungal activity by the mechanical soil disturbance may stimulate flushes of L. didymum seedling emergence. Further ecological work is of course needed to directly link spatiotemporal patterns of L. didymum emergence with fruit valve colonisation and pericarp degradation by common ascomycetes. We propose that L. didymum exploits the responsiveness of common ascomycetes to local abiotic cues in order to time the release of the pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy. Outsourcing of this function to ubiquitous fungi may explain L. didymum’s own cosmopolitan distribution.
Plant materials and growth conditions
If not otherwise indicated, experiments were conducted with L. didymum accession KM2423 collected in Osnabrück, Germany. The origin and collection information for the 10 studied accessions is given in Supplementary Table 1. Plants were grown in the greenhouse and freshly harvested mature fruit valves were collected from dry infructescences. They were dried in a desiccator with silica gel for 7 days and stored in airtight containers at −20 °C until required.
For germination assays, intact fruit valves or ‘extracted seeds’ (botanically ‘true’ seeds manually extracted from fruit valves) were placed onto 1% (w/v) agar plates (9 cm petri dishes) with 0.043% (w/v) Murashige and Skoog basal salt medium (Duchefa, Haarlem, the Netherlands) pH 7.0, referred to hereafter as rooting medium (RM). For germination assays with surface-sterilised seeds or fruit valves 0.1% (v/v) PPM (Plant Preservative Mixture, Plant Cell Technology, Washington, USA) was added to prevent microbial growth. Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm and were incubated at 15/5 °C day/night temperatures with a 12 h photoperiod, white light at ~ 100 µmol/m2/s1 (standard conditions). Germination was scored over time as visible radicle protrusion using a binocular microscope. Mean values ± SE were calculated from triplicate plates (N = 3 × 50). Mechanical scarification of fruit valves by pericarp cracking (using forceps) provided artificial pericarp rupture (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Localised mechanical abrasion of the outer pericarp was as described in Supplementary Fig. 6. Surface-sterilisation of fruit valves or extracted seeds was achieved by incubation in 1% (v/v) NaOCl, 0.02% (v/v) Tween 20 for 1 min, followed by four times for 2 min rinsing with sterile water. Re-inoculation with fungi of surface-sterilised fruit valves (Fig. 3a) was with fungal solution obtained from KM2423 fruit valves incubated for 5 days at 24 °C in darkness on 1.5% (w/v) agar plates with 2% (w/v) malt extract, pH 6.5, 0.06% (w/v) chloramphenicol.
Universal DNA barcoding of fungi
Nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) barcoding was used to identify fruit valve associated fungi. Small pieces of the fungal mycelium colonising L. didymum KM2423 fruit valves were transferred to 2% (w/v) malt extract, 0.6 µl/ml chloramphenicol, 1.5% (w/v) agar plates and incubated at 24 °C for 3 days in darkness. Colonies were then re-isolated and regrown on agar plates. Isolated fungal colonies were distinguished from each other by their characteristic features (e.g. growth and colour). Fungal colonies were transferred to 150 ml malt extract liquid culture without chloramphenicol and incubated at 28 °C for 4 days (100 U/min). Fungal cultures were filtered through Miracloth and ground in liquid nitrogen with mortar and pestle. Fungal DNA was extracted and purified as described51. DNA of the fungal ITS regions was PCR amplified by 40 cycles (1 min 94 °C, 45 s 50 °C, 2 min 72 °C) using different ITS primer combinations (18F-25R; 18F-5R; or 5F-25R)52. Amplification products were purified using the Nucleospin Gel and PCR Clean-up purification kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), ligated into plasmid vector pGEM-T (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) and transformed into E. coli strain DH5α. Plasmid DNA containing inserts were isolated from bacterial colonies and the PCR products were sequenced on an ABI Prism 377 automated sequencer with dye terminator chemistry (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany). Sequences were uploaded to the NCBI BLAST nucleotide database to test for similarity/homology.
Scanning electron microscopy
Fruit valves were used intact (Fig. 4) or opened artificially to study the anatomy of the PBZ (Fig. 6). For top views onto the PBZ at the interior side of the fruit valve, fruit valves were cut open with a razor blade. Before observation, samples were mounted on specimen stubs using a carbon adhesive disc (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany), then dried for 2 weeks in a desiccator, and coated with platinum-iridium with a sputter coater (K575X Turbo, Quorum Technologies LTD, Kent, UK). Fruit samples were analysed with a scanning electron microscope (Supra 55VP, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Sectioning and light microscopy
Fruit valves were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, buffered with 1× PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4). After rinsing in PBS (5×), samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series followed by 10 min incubation in a 1:1 mixture of ethanol (99.8%) and propylene oxide and 10 min propylene oxide. Samples were infiltrated in a 1:3 mixture of the embedding medium (Epon resin, Serva Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany) with propylene oxide overnight. Subsequently, samples were transferred into fresh embedding medium (3×) for 5 min at 60 °C. Samples were transferred into embedding moulds and polymerisation was carried out (60 °C, 48–72 h). This procedure follows the methodology described by Purschke and Nowak53. Semi-thin sections (0.5–0.7 µm) were cut using an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E, Reichert Microscope Services, Depew, USA) with a diamond knife (Diatome histo jumbo 6.0 mm, Science Services, München, Germany). The embedding medium was removed as described54 prior to staining with safranin-astrablue histostain.
Wheat germ agglutinin-Alexa Fluor 633 staining
Fruit valve samples were embedded in Pattex two-component adhesive (Henkel, Düsseldorf, Germany). After drying for 2 h, samples were cut in 25 µm sections by using a rotary microtome (Leica RM2125RT, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections (Fig. 6j) were stained with 1% (w/v) WGA-Alexa Fluor 633 (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) as described55, while controls (Fig. 6k) remain unstained. Sections on microscope slides were washed twice with Hank’s balanced salt solution (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and subsequently transferred to distilled water. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (FluoView 1000, Olympus, Tokyo) was conducted (Excitation: 635 nm, Emission 650–750 nm) with imaging of z-stacks performed with a ×20 air objective (UPLSAPO, NA 0.75, Olympus) at a voxel size of 0.621 × 0.621 × 5 µm. Lignin auto-fluorescence was detected by laser excitation at 405 nm with a distinct emission peak at ∼450 nm (emission bandpass 420–470 nm). Both signals, WGA-Alexa Fluor 633 and lignin, were separated by two channel sequential acquisition. For analysis, maximum intensity projections were calculated from z-stacks and background subtraction with subsequent contrast enhancement was performed (FIJI56, NIH ImageJ57 distribution). It is known that WGA binds to specific glycoprotein58 or hemicellulose59 epitopes in plant secondary cell walls.
Puncture force experiments were carried out on dry fruit valves of accession KM2423 using a custom-built material testing machine2, 60 using a 20 N load cell. A rounded measuring tip (Ø 0.5 mm) was lowered to the sample at a constant speed (0.7 mm/min), while force and displacement were recorded simultaneously. To study the influence of fungal colonisation on the material properties of the pericarp samples, fruit valves with (untreated) and without (surface sterilised) fungal colonisation were compared at 0 and after 35 days of incubation at standard conditions. Fruit valves were cut in half using a razor blade. The seed was removed from the pericarp and the empty fruit valves were placed on a sample holder (cylindrical metal sample holder with a 1.5 mm hole). Distal, proximal and dorsal parts of the fruit valves were tested (N = 26–32). One way ANOVA was carried out followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA, version 7.02).
Fungal ITS sequences were submitted to GenBank and their accession numbers were included in Table 1. The numeric raw data of this article was uploaded to the Figshare repository (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5532412).
Read, J. & Stokes, A. Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. Am. J. Bot. 93, 1546–1565 (2006).
Steinbrecher, T. & Leubner-Metzger, G. The biomechanics of seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 765–783 (2017).
Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Seeds—Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination (Academic Press, San Diego, 2014).
Dardick, C. & Callahan, A. M. Evolution of the fruit endocarp: molecular mechanisms underlying adaptations in seed protection and dispersal strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 284 (2014).
Finch-Savage, W. E. & Leubner-Metzger, G. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 171, 501–523 (2006).
Hill, A. W. The method of germination of seeds enclosed in a stony endocarp. Ann. Bot. 47, 873–887 (1933).
Collinson, M. E., Mancester, S. R. & Wilde, V. Fossil fruits and seeds of the Middle Eocene Messel biota, Germany. Abha. Senckenberg Ges. Naturforschung 570, 1–249 (2012).
Baskin, J. M., Baskin, C. C. & Li, X. Taxonomy, anatomy and evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Plant Spec. Biol. 15, 139–152 (2000).
Orozco-Segovia, A. et al. Seed anatomy and water uptake in relation to seed dormancy in Opuntia tomentosa (Cactaceae, Opuntioideae). Ann. Bot. 99, 581–592 (2007).
Cousens, R. D., Young, K. R. & Tadayyon, A. The role of the persistent fruit wall in seed water regulation in Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Ann. Bot. 105, 101–108 (2010).
Neya, O., Hoekstra, F. A. & Golovina, E. A. Mechanism of endocarp-imposed constraints of germination of Lannea microcarpa seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 18, 13–24 (2008).
Mamut, J., Tan, D.-Y., Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Role of trichomes and pericarp in the seed biology of the desert annual Lachnoloma lehmannii (Brassicaceae). Ecol. Res. 29, 33–44 (2014).
Lu, J. J., Zhou, Y. M., Tan, D. Y., Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Seed dormancy in six cold desert Brasicaceae species with indehiscent fruits. Seed Sci. Res. 25, 276–285 (2015).
Zhou, Y. M., Lu, J. J., Tan, D. Y., Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Seed germination ecology of the cold desert annual Isatis violascens (Brassicaceae): two levels of physiological dormancy and role of the pericarp. PLoS ONE 10, e0140983 (2015).
Delgado-Sanchez, P., Ortega-Amaro, M. A., Rodriguez-Hernandez, A. A., Jimenez-Bremont, J. F. & Flores, J. Are fungi important for breaking seed dormancy in desert species? Experimental evidence in Opuntia streptacantha (Cactaceae). Plant Biol. 13, 154–159 (2011).
Willis, C. G. et al. The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytol. 203, 300–309 (2014).
Huang, C. H. et al. Resolution of Brassicaceae phylogeny using nuclear genes uncovers nested radiations and supports convergent morphological evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 394–412 (2016).
Mummenhoff, K., Polster, A., Muhlhausen, A. & Theissen, G. Lepidium as a model system for studying the evolution of fruit development in Brassicaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1503–1513 (2009).
Lenser, T. et al. Developmental control and plasticity of fruit and seed dimorphism in Aethionema arabicum. Plant Physiol. 172, 1691–1707 (2016).
Mühlhausen, A., Lenser, T., Mummenhoff, K. & Theissen, G. Evidence that an evolutionary transition from dehiscent to indehiscent fruits in Lepidium (Brassicaceae) was caused by a change in the control of valve margin identity genes. Plant J. 73, 824–835 (2013).
Graeber, K. et al. DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 mediates a conserved coat dormancy mechanism for the temperature- and gibberellin-dependent control of seed germination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3571–E3580 (2014).
Graeber, K. et al. Spatiotemporal seed development analysis provide insight into primary dormancy induction and evolution of the Lepidium DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 genes. Plant Physiol. 161, 1903–1917 (2013).
Al-Shehbaz, I., Mummenhoff, K. & Appel, O. Cardaria, Coronopus, and Stroganowia are united with Lepidium (Brassicaceae). Novon 12, 5–11 (2002).
Walker, N. J. & Gray, I. K. The glucosinolate of land cress (Coronopus didymus) and its enzymativ degradation products as precursors of off-flavor in milk—a review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 18, 346–352 (1970).
Popay, A. I., Cox, T. I., Ingle, A. & Kerr, R. Seasonal emergence of weeds in cultivated soil in New Zealand. Weed Res. 35, 429–436 (1995).
Roberts, H. A. Seed persistence in soil and seasonal emergence in plant species from different habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 23, 639–656 (1986).
Roxburgh, S. H. & Wilson, J. B. Stability and coexistence in a lawn community: experimental assessment of the stability of the actual community. Oikos 88, 409–423 (2000).
Thompson, K., Green, A. & Jewels, A. M. Seeds in soil and worm cast from a neutral grassland. Funct. Ecol. 8, 29–35 (1994).
Rahman, A., James, T. K. & Grbavac, N. Correlation between the soil seed bank and weed populations in maize fields. Weed Biol. Manag. 6, 228–234 (2006).
Kiffe, K. Ein Beitrag zur Ausbreitung und Soziologie des zweiknotigen Krähenfusses (Coronopus didymus (L.) SM.), Brassicaceae. Nat. Heimat 50, 81–83 (1990).
Farquhar, T. & Zhao, Y. Fracture mechanics and its relevance to botanical structures. Am. J. Bot. 93, 1449–1454 (2006).
Schoch, C. L. et al. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6241–6246 (2012).
Nesci, A., Barros, G., Castillo, C. G. & Etcheverry, M. Soil fungal population in preharvest maize ecosystem in different tillage practices in Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 91, 143–149 (2006).
Gaur, R., Singh, R., Gupta, M. & Gaur, M. K. Aureobasidium pullulans, an economically important polymorphic yeast with special reference to pullulan. Afric. J. Biotechnol. 9, 7989–7997 (2010).
Zalar, P. et al. Phylogeny and ecology of the ubiquitous saprobe Cladosporium sphaerospermum, with descriptions of seven new species from hypersaline environments. Stud. Mycol. 58, 157–183 (2007).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346, 1256688 (2014).
Vega, F. E., Posada, F., Peterson, S. W., Gianfagna, T. J. & Chaves, F. Penicillium species endophytic in coffee plants and ochratoxin A production. Mycologia 98, 31–42 (2006).
Barret, M. et al. Emergence shapes the structure of the seed microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 1257–1266 (2015).
Hodgson, S. et al. Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1199–1208 (2014).
Links, M. G. et al. Simultaneous profiling of seed-associated bacteria and fungi reveals antagonistic interactions between microorganisms within a shared epiphytic microbiome on Triticum and Brassica seeds. New Phytol. 202, 542–553 (2014).
Parsa, S. et al. Fungal endophytes in germinated seeds of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. Fungal Biol. 120, 783–790 (2016).
Tamura, R., Hashidoko, Y., Ogita, N., Limin, S. H. & Tahara, S. Requirement for particular seed-borne fungi for seed germination and seedling growth of Xyris complanata, a pioneer monocot in topsoil-lost tropical peatland in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Ecol. Res. 23, 573–579 (2008).
Yamaji, K., Fukushi, Y., Hashidoko, Y., Yoshida, T. & Tahara, S. Penicillium fungi from Picea glehnii seeds protect the seedlings from damping-off. New Phytol. 152, 521–531 (2001).
Hubbard, M., Germida, J. J. & Vujanovic, V. Fungal endophytes enhance wheat heat and drought tolerance in terms of grain yield and second-generation seed viability. J. Appl. Microbiol. 116, 109–122 (2014).
Hamayun, M. et al. Cladosporium sphaerospermum as a new plant growth-promoting endophyte from the roots of Glycine max (L.) Merr. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 627–632 (2009).
Guttridge, C. G., Woodley, S. E. & Hunter, T. Accelerating strawberry seed germination by fungal infection. Ann. Bot. 54, 223–230 (1984).
Andersen, B., Poulsen, R. & Hansen, G. H. Cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities of common indoor fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 107, 111–116 (2016).
Bezerra, J. D. et al. Richness of endophytic fungi isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica Mill. (Cactaceae) and preliminary screening for enzyme production. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 1989–1995 (2012).
Hu, X. W., Wang, Y. R. & Wu, Y. P. Effects of the pericarp on imbibition, seed germination, and seedling establishment in seeds of Hedysarum scoparium Fisch. et Mey. Ecol. Res. 24, 559–564 (2009).
Miler, O., Albayrak, I., Nikora, V. & O’Hare, M. Biomechanical properties of aquatic plants and their effects on plant-flow interactions in streams and rivers. Aquat. Sci. 74, 31–44 (2012).
Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A. & Koch, M. Molecular phylogenetics of Thlaspi sl (Brassicaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Can. J. Bot. 75, 469–482 (1997).
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. in PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications (eds Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J.) 315–322 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990).
Purschke, G. & Nowak, K. H. Ultrastructure of pigmented eves in Dorvilleidae (Annelida, Errantia, Eunicida) and their importance for understanding the evolution of eyes in polychaetes. Acta Zool. 96, 67–81 (2015).
Böck, P. Der Semidünnschnitt. (J. F. Bergmann Verlag, München, 1984).
Ohashi-Ito, K., Oda, Y. & Fukuda, H. Arabidopsis VASCULAR-RELATED NAC-DOMAIN6 directly regulates the genes that govern programmed cell death and secondary wall formation during xylem differentiation. Plant Cell 22, 3461–3473 (2010).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Wojtaszek, P. & Bolwell, G. P. Secondary cell-wall-specific glycoprotein(s) from French bean hypocotyls. Plant Physiol. 108, 1001–1012 (1995).
Hogetsu, T. Detection of hemicelluloses specific to the cell-wall of tracheary elements and phloem cells by fluorescein-conjugated lectins. Protoplasma 156, 67–73 (1990).
Hourston, J. E., Ignatz, M., Reith, M., Leubner-Metzger, G. & Steinbrecher, T. Biomechanical properties of wheat grains: the implications on milling. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20160828 (2017).
We thank N. Scarlett, J.F. Castro, D. Zacharias, W. Grenzheuser for L. didymum seed samples, U. Coja for discussion and help with fungal identification, F. Przesdzink for technical assistance, G. Purschke and Hans-Peter Schmitz for critical discussions, and the Botanical Garden Osnabrück for help with seed propagation. We acknowledge the following agencies who support our work on Lepidium seed dormancy: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) to K.M. (MU137/8-2), and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) to G.L.-M. and T.S. (BB/M000583/1). The support for the seed-microbe project by Azotic Technology to G.L.-M. and J.E.H. is gratefully acknowledged.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sperber, K., Steinbrecher, T., Graeber, K. et al. Fruit fracture biomechanics and the release of Lepidium didymum pericarp-imposed mechanical dormancy by fungi. Nat Commun 8, 1868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02051-9
This article is cited by
“Phoenix in Flight”: an unique fruit morphology ensures wind dispersal of seeds of the phoenix tree (Firmiana simplex (L.) W. Wight)
BMC Plant Biology (2022)
Physiological and environmental control of seed germination timing in Mediterranean mountain populations of Gundelia tournefortii
Plant Growth Regulation (2022)
Seed dispersal of wild radishes and its association with within-population spatial distribution
BMC Ecology (2020)
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The role of seed appendage in improving the adaptation of a species in definite seasons: a case study of Atriplex centralasiatica
BMC Plant Biology (2019)
Microstructure and mechanical properties of hard Acrocomia mexicana fruit shell
Scientific Reports (2018)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.