Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Thin single crystal perovskite solar cells to harvest below-bandgap light absorption



The efficiency of perovskite solar cells has surged in the past few years, while the bandgaps of current perovskite materials for record efficiencies are much larger than the optimal value, which makes the efficiency far lower than the Shockley–Queisser efficiency limit. Here we show that utilizing the below-bandgap absorption of perovskite single crystals can narrow down their effective optical bandgap without changing the composition. Thin methylammonium lead triiodide single crystals with tuned thickness of tens of micrometers are directly grown on hole-transport-layer covered substrates by a hydrophobic interface confined lateral crystal growth method. The spectral response of the methylammonium lead triiodide single crystal solar cells is extended to 820 nm, 20 nm broader than the corresponding polycrystalline thin-film solar cells. The open-circuit voltage and fill factor are not sacrificed, resulting in an efficiency of 17.8% for single crystal perovskite solar cells.


Organic–inorganic halide perovskites (OIHPs) have attracted tremendous attentions for solar cell application in the past few years1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 due to the superior optoelectronic properties, such as large extinction coefficient10, long carrier recombination lifetime11, large carrier mobility12, unique defect physics13, etc. The efficiency of OIHP solar cells has reached 22.1% quickly after development in a few years by the improvement of material quality and device interface9, but it is facing a bottleneck caused by the non-optimized bandgap of the current perovskite materials. The most widely studied perovskite solar cells are based on CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3), which has a bandgap too large for single-junction solar cells14. To reduce the bandgap of MAPbI3, composition engineering has been developed by partially replacing MA+ and Pb2+ with FA+ and Sn2+, respectively15,16,17,18, which however brings new challenges. The easy oxidation of Sn2+ to Sn4+ causes additional severe chemical instability of the Sn-containing perovskite17. Introduction of excessive FA+ ions can cause the instability of material structure16.

Here we exploit an approach to broaden the absorption spectrum of perovskites by utilizing their below-bandgap transition. Below-bandgap absorption has been identified in MAPbI3 in previous studies, which was attributed to the indirect-bandgap absorption transition with a bandgap of ~60 meV smaller than the direct bandgap19,20,21,22. We found other perovskite materials, such as MAPbBr3, also showed below-gap absorption. Similar to silicon single crystal solar cells, further improvement of the device efficiency may be achieved by utilizing the below-bandgap absorption. However, the absorption coefficient corresponding to the below-bandgap transition is several orders magnitude smaller than that of the above-gap transition. Therefore, the thickness of the perovskite films thus needs to be over several micrometers (µm) or more, which is however beyond the carrier diffusion length in existing polycrystalline perovskite films. Perovskite single crystals are shown to have much longer carrier diffusion length well above tens of micrometer due to the absence of grain boundaries and significantly reduced defect density23,24,25,26. Current studies of the intrinsic properties of the perovskites are mainly based on thick bulk single crystals with thickness of millimeter27,28 which are too thick for application in solar cells. Growing thin perovskite single crystals with large area represents an effective approach to overcome this obstacle29,30,31, however there is no effective method handling the micrometer-thick iodide-based perovskite single crystals with large area. Recently, Liu et al.32 reported an efficiency of about 4% for perovskite single crystal solar cells. The low efficiency was due to the too large thickness of 50 μm for the perovskite crystal and non-passivated surface defects.

Herein, we report the growth of perovskite single crystals directly onto hole transport layer (HTL) covered indium tin oxide (ITO) substrates with controlled thickness of tens of micrometer and area of tens of millimeter square (mm2). Solar cells based on the thin single crystals show obviously broader spectral response compared to the polycrystalline thin-film solar cells, while the open-circuit voltage (V OC) and fill factor (FF) of the solar cells remain comparable to those of polycrystalline thin-film solar cells, which demonstrates the potential for the application of perovskite single crystals to further boost the efficiency of perovskite solar cells.


Thickness-dependent device performance

We first simulate the thickness-dependent absorption of MAPbI3 and device efficiency to find out the feasibility of increasing device efficiency by utilizing the below-bandgap transition in MAPbI3 and the details are shown in the “Method” section. Figure 1a shows an absorption coefficient curve of MAPbI3 from literature33, which does show two–four orders magnitude weaker absorption for below-bandgap transition than direct transition. Figure 1b shows the calculated thickness-dependent percentage of light absorbed by the MAPbI3 films in devices where a full reflection of the light by a metal back electrode is assumed. When the thickness of MAPbI3 films increases from 500 nm to 200 µm, the absorption spectrum expands significantly to near-infrared region, leading to the red-shift of the absorption edge to 850 nm. The enhanced absorption in this wavelength range is important to increase the short-circuit current density (J SC), because sunlight has a significant portion of energy in this wavelength range. As shown in Fig. 1c, as the thickness of perovskite crystals increases from 500 nm to 200 µm, (J SC) increases from 23.0 mA cm−2 to 27.1 mA cm−2 due to the broadened absorption spectrum. The V OC of the devices, however, has an opposite variation trend with respect to the thickness of absorber based on the diode equation:

$$V_{\rm{OC}\,} = \frac{{kT}}{q}{\mathrm{In}}\left( {\frac{{J_{\rm{SC}}}}{{J_0}}} \right)$$

where T, k, q, and, J 0 are the absolute temperature, Boltzmann constant, elementary charge, and reverse bias saturated dark current density, respectively. The details for the simulation of crystal thickness-dependent efficiency limit of the single crystal solar cells can be found in the Supplementary Note. Though increased J SC slightly increases V OC, larger thickness of perovskite films increases the charge recombination during their transport and thus J 0, which reduces V OC. The charge recombination dominates the variation of V OC with a clear reduction with increasing crystal thickness, as shown in Fig. 1c. There should be an optimal absorber thickness that the perovskite single crystal solar cells reach the highest efficiency. To determine the optimal thickness of perovskite single crystals, we assumed a constant FF of 80%, 90% external quantum efficiency (EQE) over the whole absorption spectrum, which are all reasonable and are justified in the “Method” section. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) increases first and then decreases with increasing the thickness of single crystals, resulting in an optimal crystal thickness of 200 μm. When the crystal thickness is over 10 μm, the PCE is higher than 23.5%, which is far beyond the state-of-the-art values of MAPbI3 polycrystalline thin-film solar cells.

Fig. 1

Thickness-dependent perovskite absorption and device performance. a Schematic illustration of the direct, below-bandgap transitions and absorption coefficient of methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3) from a polycrystalline film. b The calculated absorption of MAPbI3 films with different thickness. c The calculated ideal dependence of J sc, V oc, and PCE of the single crystal solar cells on the thickness of the thin single crystals

Growth and characterization of thin crystals

A diffusion-facilitated space-confined method was developed to obtain perovskite single crystals with controllable thickness down to micrometer scale. The confined space was constructed by two substrates (Fig. 2a), and the supersaturation of precursor solution was generated by the inverse solubility method23. The space-confined method was reported to grow thin perovskite singe crystals31, however, the crystal thickness could hardly go down to 100 µm for large-area perovskite crystals. The lateral crystal growth in this method can be limited by the inefficient long-range transportation of precursor ions along micrometer-size gap to continuously replenish the depleted precursors by crystal growth, which results in the formation of many small crystals or even polycrystals, as illustrated in Fig. 2d. When the gap is down to micrometer scale, the interaction between substrate surface and solvent in precursor solution becomes critically important for ion diffusion in solvent. Since the perovskite precursor ions generally form complex with the solvent34, the diffusion rate of precursor ions is determined by how fast the solvent molecules can transport on the substrate, and the surface tension determines how fast the solvent molecules close to the substrate can move along in-plane direction35,36,37. On wetting substrates, such as glass or ITO, the large surface tension imposes a friction force that drags down the ion diffusion38, as illustrated in Fig. 2e. Interestingly, when the substrates are covered with hydrophobic materials, such as PTAA39, which is also a hole transport material for perovskite solar cells, the ion diffusion is dramatically accelerated. The dramatically enhanced ion diffusion rate in micrometer-size gap enables a continuous growth of thin perovskite single crystals up to several millimeters along in-plane direction, as illustrated in Fig. 2c. To illustrate the dramatically enhanced ion diffusion rate by the surface modification, a drop of MAPbI3 precursor solution was placed at the end of two regular glass substrates (left in Fig. 2g) and two ITO substrates covered by PTAA (right in Fig. 2g), which had a same gap of 10 μm filled with pure γ-butyrolactone (GBL) solvent, and they were hold at the temperature for crystal growth (110 °C) or room temperature. Driven by the concentration gradient, the precursor ions diffused in the GBL solution from the bottom side to the topside, and the diffusion of ions could be visualized by the color change of the solution with diffusion rate estimated by motion of front edge at the interface of pure GBL and perovskite precursor solution. As expected, the edge propagation was very slow (0.01 mm s−1) in the gap of two glass substrates, while was at least 100-fold faster in the gap of two PTAA-covered ITO substrates (see Supplementary Video 1). We speculate that the much faster ion diffusion can be ascribed to the excellent lubrication effect of the nonwetting PTAA surface38. The nonwetting surface weakens the solvent–substrate interaction at the substrate surface, which will promote the diffusion of solvent. Therefore, the ions that form complexes with GBL molecules would not be dragged during the diffusion, as illustrated in Fig. 2f.

Fig. 2

Growth mechanism of perovskite thin single crystals. ad Schematic illustrations of correlation between ion diffusion and thin single-crystal growth. Schematic illustrations of ion diffusion rate in the confined gaps using e hydrophilic and f hydrophobic substrates. g Photographs of the diffusion process of methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3) precursor solution in the confined gaps after different durations using hydrophilic glass and hydrophobic PTAA-covered ITO substrates

The fast ion transportation in the gap between two PTAA-covered substrates enables continuous growth of thin perovskite single crystals to a large area. The thin single crystals were grown on a PTAA-covered ITO substrate and the other PTAA-covered ITO substrate could be easily peeled off. The method is universally applicable to both iodide- and bromide-based perovskites. Figure 3a, b shows the photographs of as-grown millimeter-size MAPbI3 and MAPbBr3 single crystals with thickness of 10–20 μm. As shown in Fig. 3c–e, thin MAPbI3 single crystals are obtained with tuned thickness from 10 to 40 μm. For single crystals with thickness smaller than 10 μm, small-area multicrystals with lots of cracks were usually formed, which led to poor PCE for solar cells. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of a thin MAPbI3 single crystal in Fig. 3f shows only two sharp diffraction peaks which can be assigned to (200) and (400) planes, indicating that the crystal is (100) oriented. The corresponding rocking curve displays a small full-width at half-maximum of 0.33° for the (400) plane (Supplementary Fig. 1a), confirming the good quality of the thin single crystal. The 2D XRD shown in Supplementary Fig. 1b consists of scattered diffraction spots rather than a continuous arc, proving the single-crystal character of the grown materials. XRD pattern of the powders scratched from the thin single crystals (inset of Fig. 3f) confirms the tetragonal structure of these crystals at room temperature. The top-view SEM image of the thin single crystal (Supplementary Fig. 2) shows that the surface of the thin single crystal is smooth. Figure 3g shows the single-path absorption spectra of a single crystal with thickness of 10 μm and a polycrystalline thin film with thickness of 500 nm, which manifests an obvious redshift of the absorption spectrum edge from 790 to 810 nm. The redshift of the absorption spectrum is general for other kinds of perovskites, such as MAPbBr3, Cs0.05(FA0.85MA0.15)0.95Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3 (Supplementary Fig. 3) and FAPbI3 24. The hole and electron mobility of the thin single crystals measured by the space charge limit current (SCLC) method (Supplementary Fig. 4) are 121 ± 15 cm2 V−1 s−1 and 36.8 ± 3.7 cm2 V−1 s−1, which are comparable to the values of bulk single crystals, indicating the good quality of the as-grown thin single crystals. The carrier recombination lifetime was measured by the transient photovoltaic (TPV) measurement under one-sun illumination (Fig. 4b). The obtained carrier lifetime is 2.2 ± 0.5 μs, which is shorter than that of bulk single crystals measured by the same method, because the smaller volume of the thin single crystals increases the carrier density, thus increasing the bimolecular recombination. In addition, carriers in the thinner single crystals are more susceptible to surface recombination by a quicker transit to the crystal surface. Combining the measured mobility and lifetime, the hole diffusion length and electron diffusion length under one-sun light are calculated to be 24.7 and 13.6 μm, respectively.

Fig. 3

Characterization of perovskite thin single crystals. Photographs of a methylammonium lead triiodide (MAPbI3) thin single crystal and b methylammonium lead tribromide (MAPbBr3) thin single crystal using the hydrophobic interface confined lateral growth method. Cross-sectional SEM images of the MAPbI3 thin single crystals with different thickness: c ≈10 μm, d ≈20 μm, e ≈40 μm. f X-ray diffraction patterns of a MAPbI3 thin single crystal and the grounded powder (inset). g Absorption spectra of a 10-μm-thick MAPbI3 thin single crystal and a 500-nm-thick polycrystalline film

Fig. 4

Characterization of perovskite single-crystal solar cells. a Device structure of the single-crystal solar cells. b Transient photovoltaic curve of a single-crystal solar cell under one-sun illumination. c Current density–voltage and d external quantum efficiency (EQE) curves and integrated current density of the optimal single-crystal solar cells using methylammonium lead triiodide thin single crystal with different thickness. e EQE of single-crystal solar cells and polycrystalline thin-film solar cells. f Trap density of states of the single-crystal solar cells before and after methylammonium iodide (MAI) treatment. g Current density–voltage curves of the single-crystal solar cells after MAI treatment measured under different scanning directions. h Stabilized J sc and PCE of single-crystal solar cells with MAI treatment. The thicknesses of the single crystals in Fig. eh and polycrystalline thin film are 10 and 500 nm, respectively

Perovskite single-crystal solar cells

Single-crystal solar cells with device structure of ITO/PTAA/MAPbI3/phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM)/C60/bathocuproine (BCP)/copper (Cu) (Fig. 4a) were fabricated by depositing electron transport layers (ETLs) and metal electrodes on the top of the single crystals with the easy handling of ITO substrates. Figure 4c, d shows the thickness-dependent J–V and EQE curves of the single-crystal solar cells. The highest device efficiency is obtained when using single crystals with thickness of 10 μm, which is consistent with the measured carrier diffusion length. The best device has a J SC of 20.5 mA cm−2, a V OC of 1.06 V, a FF of 74.1%, and a PCE of 16.1%. As shown in Fig. 4e, the EQE spectrum of this device shows an EQE cutoff at 820 nm, corresponding to 20-nm redshift compared to that of the polycrystalline thin-film devices. The larger redshift of EQE spectrum than the absorption spectrum should be attributed to the reflection of light by the electrode, which doubles the effective crystal thickness for light absorbing. The statistics of PCE, FF, J SC, and V OC for devices using single crystals with thickness of 10 μm are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6.

It is noted that thin single crystals may still have large surface charge traps40, though the bulk trap density should be very small. The surface charge traps are most likely generated from the loss of MAI when removing the single crystals out of the hot precursor solution41. Therefore, we treated the surface of the single crystals by spin coating MAI solution to reduce the surface charge trap density. This surface passivation effect was confirmed by the enhanced photoluminescence intensity (Supplementary Fig. 7). As shown in Fig. 4f, the surface trap density of the thin single crystals measured by thermal admittance spectroscopy is reduced by 2–5-folds after MAI treatment. The PCE of the best device also increases to 17.8% with a J SC of 21.0 mA cm−2, a V OC of 1.08 V, and a FF of 78.6% (Fig. 4g). The PCE of the device is confirmed by measuring the steady-state photocurrent output at the maximum power point (Fig. 4h). The increase of J SC is consistent with the increase of the EQE values (Supplementary Fig. 8), and matches with the calculated J SC from EQE. The corresponding statistics of PCE, FF, J SC, and V OC are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9. By comparing with the calculated results in Fig. 1c, the V OC is close to its predicted value of 1.14 V, and the FF is close to what is observed in high-efficiency polycrystalline perovskite solar cells. The main limiting parameter of the present single-crystal solar cells is the smaller J SC than the predicted value of 25.8 mA cm−2, which may be caused by the enhanced light reflection on the much flatter single-crystal surface (Supplementary Fig. 10a), in addition to charge collection loss caused by the incompletely passivated surface defects on both surfaces of the single crystals (Supplementary Fig. 10b). Addressing these issues will have potential to further increase the efficiency.

Finally, we evaluate the stability of the single-crystal solar cells. We have demonstrated that bulk single crystals showed better moisture stability than the polycrystalline thin films due to the absence of grain boundaries41. Therefore, the air stability of the single-crystal solar cells should be better than that of polycrystalline thin-film solar cells. To confirm this, the shell lifetime of the single-crystal solar cells in air is investigated. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 11, the PCE shows almost no change after the device was stored in air under dark for 30 days, which is better than the polycrystalline thin-film solar cells.


In conclusion, we demonstrated the use of a single crystal to broaden the photoresponse range of the perovskite solar cells without losing device photovoltage and fill factor. MAPbI3 thin single crystals were grown by a hydrophobic interface-confined lateral growth method, which yielded well control of crystal thickness at tens of micrometers. This work presents a new direction to further boost the efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells. More efforts are needed to enhance the carrier diffusion length and passivate the surface nonradiative recombination center density in order to boost the device efficiency to SQ limit. The extended absorption can be attributed to the indirect bandgap absorption or Urbach band tail. Though there is some study that MAPbI3 has signature of indirect bandgap, there is no study whether the same conclusion can apply to MAPbBr3 or other perovskite materials yet. This study shows that these charges can actually be extracted out without being trapped.


Growth of perovskite thin single crystals

The perovskite thin single crystals were grown by a hydrophobic interface-confined lateral crystal growth method, as shown in Fig. 2. The PTAA film was prepared by spin coating 0.2 wt% PTAA solution in toluene at 4000 r.p.m. The as-prepared film was then thermally annealed at 100 °C for 10 min. As illustrated in Fig. 2a, 1.5 M MAPbI3 solution in GBL was inserted into two ITO/PTAA substrates, which were then placed on a hot plate with temperature of 100 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the temperature was elevated to 110 and 120 °C to further promote the growth of the single crystals. Finally, the two substrates were separated to obtain the thin single crystals on ITO/PTAA substrates. The temperature was slowly decreased to room temperature (about 2 h) to ensure a good contact between PTAA and the single crystals.

Device fabrication

The device fabrication was completed by depositing the electron transport layer and electrode. PCBM solution of 1 wt% in chlorobenzene was spun on top of the thin single crystal and then annealed at 50 °C for 10 min. After that, C60 (10 nm), BCP (3 nm), and Cu (80 nm) were thermally evaporated in sequential order. The C60 and BCP were evaporated on the whole area of the surface of the single crystal. The Cu electrode was evaporated with a mask by covering the edge of the single crystal to avoid shorts. For MAI treatment, 0.5 mg ml−1 MAI in IPA was spin coated on the single crystal before depositing PCBM and then annealed at 50 °C for 10 min.


The absorption spectra were recorded by using an Evolution 201 UV-Visible Spectrophotometer. First, the transmission spectra of the thin single crystal and polycrystalline thin film were measured. Subsequently, the corresponding absorption spectra were calculated as Absorptance = 1-Transmittance. The reflection spectrum was measured with the integrating sphere. The photocurrent density–voltage (J–V) curves of the devices were measured under AM 1.5-G irradiation (100 mW cm−2), which was produced by a xenon-lamp-based solar simulator (Oriel 67005, 150-W Solar Simulator). The light intensity was calibrated by a Schott visible-color glass-filtered (KG5 color-filtered) Si diode (Hamamatsu S1133) before photocurrent measurement. The J–V testing was performed with reverse scan direction at 0.1 V s−1 and sweep delay time was 10 ms. The EQE was obtained using a Newport QE measurement kit by focusing a monochromatic beam of light onto the devices. The X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained by a Rigaku D/Max-B X-ray diffractometer in the Bragg–Brentano parafocusing geometry. A conventional cobalt target X-ray tube equipped in the diffracted-beam monochromator was set to 40 kV and 30 mA. The SEM images were taken from a Quanta 200 FEG environmental scanning electron microscope. In the TPV measurement, the single-crystal solar cells were illuminated by laser pulses (337 nm, 4-ns width from a SRS nitrogen laser) from the ITO side to generate a transient photovoltage signal which functions as a small perturbation to the background open-circuit voltage. The transient voltage signal was recorded by a 1-GHz Agilent digital oscilloscope.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Green, M. A., Ho-Baillie, A. & Snaith, H. J. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 8, 506–514 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Burschka, J. et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499, 316–319 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Snaith, H. J. Perovskites: the emergence of a new era for low-cost, high-efficiency solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 3623–3630 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu, M., Johnston, M. B. & Snaith, H. J. Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition. Nature 501, 395–398 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhou, H. et al. Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345, 542–546 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen, W. et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 350, 944–948 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yang, W. S. et al. High-performance photovoltaic perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science 348, 1234–1237 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Li, X. et al. A vacuum flash–assisted solution process for high-efficiency large-area perovskite solar cells. Science 353, 58–62 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yang, W. S. et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 356, 1376–1379 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xiao, Z. et al. Thin-film semiconductor perspective of organometal trihalide perovskite materials for high-efficiency solar cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 101, 1–38 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stranks, S. D. et al. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 342, 341–344 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wehrenfennig, C., Eperon, G. E., Johnston, M. B., Snaith, H. J. & Herz, L. M. High Charge carrier mobilities and lifetimes in organolead trihalide perovskites. Adv. Mater. 26, 1584–1589 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yin, W.-J., Shi, T. & Yan, Y. Unusual defect physics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell absorber. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 063903 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zdanowicz, T., Rodziewicz, T. & Zabkowska-Waclawek, M. Theoretical analysis of the optimum energy band gap of semiconductors for fabrication of solar cells for applications in higher latitudes locations. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 87, 757–769 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jeon, N. J. et al. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 517, 476–480 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Eperon, G. E. et al. Formamidinium lead trihalide: a broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 982–988 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Noel, N. K. et al. Lead-free organic-inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3061–3068 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Eperon, G. E. et al. Perovskite-perovskite tandem photovoltaics with optimized band gaps. Science 354, 861–865 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Motta, C. et al. Revealing the role of organic cations in hybrid halide perovskite CH3NH3PbI3. Nat. Commun. 6, 7026 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Brivio, F., Butler, K. T., Walsh, A. & van Schilfgaarde, M. Relativistic quasiparticle self-consistent electronic structure of hybrid halide perovskite photovoltaic absorbers. Phys. Rev. B 89, 155204 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hutter, E. M. et al. Direct-indirect character of the bandgap in methylammonium lead iodide perovskite. Nat. Mater. 16, 115–120 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang, T. et al. Indirect to direct bandgap transition in methylammonium lead halide perovskite. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 509–515 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Saidaminov, M. I. et al. High-quality bulk hybrid perovskite single crystals within minutes by inverse temperature crystallization. Nat. Commun. 6, 7586 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Han, Q. et al. Single crystal formamidinium lead iodide (FAPbI3): insight into the structural, optical, and electrical properties. Adv. Mater. 28, 2253–2258 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shi, D. et al. Low trap-state density and long carrier diffusion in organolead trihalide perovskite single crystals. Science 347, 519–522 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dong, Q. et al. Lateral-structure single-crystal hybrid perovskite solar cells via piezoelectric poling. Adv. Mater. 28, 2816–2821 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liu, Y. et al. Two-inch-sized perovskite CH3NH3PbX3 (X=Cl, Br, I) crystals: growth and characterization. Adv. Mater. 27, 5176–5183 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dang, Y. et al. Formation of hybrid perovskite tin iodide single crystals by top-seeded solution growth. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 128, 3508–3511 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Peng, W. et al. Solution-grown monocrystalline hybrid perovskite films for hole-transporter-free solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 3383–3390 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chen, Y.-X. et al. General space-confined on-substrate fabrication of thickness-adjustable hybrid perovskite single-crystalline thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16196–16199 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu, Y. et al. Thinness- and shape-controlled growth for ultrathin single-crystalline perovskite wafers for mass production of superior photoelectronic devices. Adv. Mater. 28, 9204–9209 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu, Y. et al. 120 mm single-crystalline perovskite and wafers: towards viable applications. Sci. China Chem. (2017).

  33. 33.

    De Wolf, S. et al. Organometallic halide perovskites: sharp optical absorption edge and its relation to photovoltaic performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1035–1039 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jeon, N. J. et al. Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 13, 897–903 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Anderson, D. M., McFadden, G. B. & Wheeler, A. A. Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 139–165 (1998).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Eperon, G. E., Burlakov, V. M., Docampo, P., Goriely, A. & Snaith, H. J. Morphological control for high performance, solution-processed planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells. Adv. Func. Mater. 24, 151–157 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhumekenov, A. A. et al. The role of surface tension in the crystallization of metal halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 1782–1788 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L. & Netz, R. R. Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion. Langmuir 25, 10768–10781 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bi, C. et al. Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7747 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yang, Y. et al. Top and bottom surfaces limit carrier lifetime in lead iodide perovskite films. Nat. Energy 2, 16207 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dong, Q. et al. Electron-hole diffusion lengths>175 μm in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science 347, 967–970 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1-14-1-0030), Office of Naval Research (N00014-17-1-2163 and N00014-15-1-2713), and National Science Foundation (ECCS-1252623).

Author information




J.H. conceived the idea and supervised the project; Z.C., Q.D., and Y.L. grew the thin single crystal and fabricated the devices; C.B. carried out the tDOS measurement; Y.F. carried out the PL measurement; Y.L. fabricated the polycrystalline film solar cells; S.T. carried out the rocking curve measurement; Q.W. carried out the SEM measurement; X.X. carried out the TPV measurement; and Y.B. carried out the air stability test of the polycrystalline film solar cells. Y.D. carried out the XRD measurement. J.H., Z.C., and Q.D. wrote the manuscript, and all authors reviewed it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinsong Huang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Dong, Q., Liu, Y. et al. Thin single crystal perovskite solar cells to harvest below-bandgap light absorption. Nat Commun 8, 1890 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing