Article | Open

Optically driven ultra-stable nanomechanical rotor

  • Nature Communications 8, Article number: 1670 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01902-9
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Nanomechanical devices have attracted the interest of a growing interdisciplinary research community, since they can be used as highly sensitive transducers for various physical quantities. Exquisite control over these systems facilitates experiments on the foundations of physics. Here, we demonstrate that an optically trapped silicon nanorod, set into rotation at MHz frequencies, can be locked to an external clock, transducing the properties of the time standard to the rod’s motion with a remarkable frequency stability frfr of 7.7 × 1011. While the dynamics of this periodically driven rotor generally can be chaotic, we derive and verify that stable limit cycles exist over a surprisingly wide parameter range. This robustness should enable, in principle, measurements of external torques with sensitivities better than 0.25 zNm, even at room temperature. We show that in a dilute gas, real-time phase measurements on the locked nanorod transduce pressure values with a sensitivity of 0.3%.

Introduction

Frequency is the most precisely measured quantity in physics, and stable oscillators have found a plethora of applications in metrology. While pendulum clocks exploited the stability of mechanical motion to keep track of time, state-of-the-art atomic clocks rely on well-defined internal resonances of atoms, achieving a precision of a few parts in 1018 (ref. 1). To exploit the stability of clocks for physical applications, it is essential to develop “gearboxes” that can be synchronized to a good time standard, translating atomic definiteness into other domains of physics. Phase-locked quartz oscillators2 and frequency combs are examples of such transducers, imprinting clock stability onto a mechanical system or light field respectively, with high accuracy3.

Nano- and micromechanical systems are of great technological interest, due to their low mass and extreme sensitivity to external forces4,5,6, torques7, 8, acceleration9, displacement10, 11, charge12, and added mass13, 14. Many of these systems are themselves realizations of harmonic oscillators, with frequency stabilities reaching ff = 108 (refs. 15, 16), which can be further improved through mechanical engineering17, injection locking18, 19, electronic feedback20, or parametric driving21. The contact-free mechanical motion of particles suspended by external fields in vacuum22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 can reach a frequency stability that is only limited by laser power fluctuations and collisional damping by residual gas particles30.

In this work, we transduce clock stability into the rotation of an optically trapped silicon nanorod in vacuum. By periodically driving the rotation with circularly polarized light, we create a nanomechanical rotor whose rotation frequency fr, and frequency noise, is determined by the periodic drive alone. This driven rotor is sensitive to non-conservative forces, and the operating frequency can be tuned by almost 1012 times its linewidth. Through our method, the frequency stability is independent of material stress, laser noise, and collisional damping. The driven nanorotor operates at room temperature, and across a wide pressure range from low vacuum to medium vacuum, achieving a pressure resolution of three parts-per-thousand, and in principle allowing a torque sensitivity below the zepto-Nm level.

Results

Frequency locking

We levitate a nanofabricated silicon nanorod in the standing light wave formed by two counterpropagating laser beams, and track its motion by monitoring the scattered light, see Fig. 1a and “Methods”. When the laser is linearly polarized, the nanorod is harmonically trapped in an antinode of the standing wave and aligned with the field polarization. When the laser is circularly polarized, the scattered light exerts a torque29, 31, 32 and propels the nanorod in the plane orthogonal to the beam axis, while its center-of-mass remains trapped29. The maximum rotation frequency of the rod is determined by its size, the pressure, and the laser intensity29. Collisions with gas particles, and center-of-mass excursions into regions of different light intensity, give rise to a broad distribution of rotational frequencies29, as shown by the blue curve in Fig. 1c.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Frequency locking. a A silicon nanorod is optically trapped in a standing wave formed by counterpropagating focussed laser beams at λ = 1550 nm, see “Methods” section. The polarization of the light is controlled using a fiber-EOM driven by a signal generator. We detect the motion of the nanorod via the scattered light collected in a multimode optical fiber. The signal is mixed down with a local oscillator f LO to record the spectrum and the phase of the rotation with respect to the drive frequency f d. Both frequencies f d and f LO are synced to a common clock. b Power spectral density (gray points) of the frequency-locked rotation at 1.11 MHz, taken over 4 continuous days, fit with a Lorentzian (red curve). The upper bound on the FWHM is 1.3 μHz. c Comparison of driven rotation when frequency-locked (“locked rotation”, red, right axis) and un-locked (“threshold rotation”, blue, left axis)

However, if the rod is driven by periodically switching the laser polarization between linear and circular, the rod can frequency lock to this modulation, leading to a sharp peak in the power spectral density (PSD) of the scattered light (Fig. 1b). The locked rotation peak is eleven orders of magnitude narrower than in the unlocked case (Fig. 1c). The rotation frequency can be continuously tuned over a range of 1012 linewidths whilst locked to the periodic drive, retaining its high frequency stability.

In order to characterize the frequency-locked rotation, we drive the nanorod with frequency fd = 1.11 MHz, at a gas pressure pg = 4 mbar and total laser power P = 1.35 W. We record its motion continuously for four days (see “Methods” section). The PSD of the locked rotation is shown in Fig. 1b. We record an extremely narrow feature, which yields a Lorentzian FWHM below 1.3 μHz within one standard deviation. In this way, we achieve rotational stability with a phase noise −80 dBc Hz−1 below the signal at only 3 mHz from the carrier frequency (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Characterizing the locked rotation. The phase noise of the rotor (red) and drive (blue) is calculated from two individual four day measurements at a drive frequency of f d = 1.11 MHz (see “Methods” section)

Stable limit cycles

To explain this ultra-stable rotation, we model the dynamics of the rod’s orientation α with respect to the polarization axis29. Denoting by Γ the damping rate due to gas collisions (a function of gas pressure pg), by N the torque exerted by the circularly polarized standing wave (a function of laser power P) and by V the maximum potential energy of the rod in a linearly polarized standing wave, the equation of motion is

α ¨ =-Γ α ° + N I h ( t ) - V I sin ( 2 α ) [ 1 - h ( t ) ] ,
(1)

where I=M 2 12 is the moment of inertia and h(t) represents the periodic driving, with h(t) = 1 for circular polarization at t [0, 1/2fd) and h(t) = 0 for linear polarization at t  [1/2fd, 1/fd); expressions for Γ, N, and V are given in “Methods” section.

In the limit of long driving times t1 f d the nanorod rotates with constant mean rotation frequency f r = α ° 2π, and its motion approaches one of two qualitatively distinct types of limit cycles. In the first type, threshold rotation, fr = N/(4πIΓ) is determined by the balance between Γ and the time averaged radiation torque N/2. Threshold rotation exhibits a broad frequency distribution, as shown by the blue curve in Fig. 1c, due to its dependence on P and pg29. It should be noted, that the behavior of threshold rotation is almost identical to illuminating the nanorotor continuously with circularly polarized light, which propels the rod at a maximum rotation frequency fr = N/(2πIΓ).

In the second type of limit cycle, the aforementioned locked rotation, fr locks to a rational fraction of the driving frequency. Experimentally, we observe fr:fd = 1:2– and fr:fd = 1:4–locking, where the rod performs one rotation in two or four driving periods, respectively. The rotational frequency fr now does not depend on environmental parameters such as pg or P, but only on the frequency stability of the drive. Locked rotation is shown in Fig. 1b and the red curve in Fig. 1c.

The realized limit cycle is determined by the initial dynamics of the nanorod, and by experimental parameters such as pg, P, fd, and the rod dimensions. For a given nanorod the ratio between torque and potential is fixed, and thus Eq. (1) depends only on the dimensionless damping rate Γ/fd and dimensionless torque N f d 2 I. In Fig. 3a we show this reduced parameter space. The blue shaded area indicates the region where 1:2–locking is possible. The labeled solid lines indicate where threshold and locked rotations have the same frequency, and locking occurs independent of the initial conditions.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Driven rotor. a Reduced parameter space for the periodically driven nanorod. Different regions can exhibit different limit cycles, as determined by the initial conditions. Within the blue shaded region f r:f d = 1:2–locking can occur, while it can not be realized in the white region. Along the labeled solid lines the frequency of threshold rotation coincides with 1:2– or 1:4–locking. To explore the various limit cycles we select a path in parameter space (solid red line) which we follow experimentally by adiabatically varying p g and f d. b Experimentally measured rotation frequencies f r along the path in parameter space (blue points), and simulation (solid red line). The three different limit cycles observed are: threshold rotation (orange dotted lines), 1:2– and 1:4–locking (horizontal solid lines)

Rotational dynamics

To explore the dynamics of the driven nanorotor, we experimentally vary pg and fd, thereby following a path through parameter space (red line in Fig. 3a). The observed fr are shown as blue points in Fig. 3b, the top panel showing the path 1–2–3, and the lower panels 3–4. This plot shows that for certain parameters both types of limit cycles can be observed, depending on the initial conditions. When starting from 1, the rotation 1:2–locks to the drive (horizontal solid line). When increasing pg along 1–2, the rod jumps out of lock, and exhibits threshold rotation. When decreasing fd along 2–3, the rod remains at threshold rotation, following the theoretically expected frequencies with excellent agreement (orange dotted lines). Decreasing pg along 3–4, the rod first follows the threshold rotation frequency until it crosses the horizontal line, where it briefly enters 1:4–locked rotation, returns to threshold rotation and eventually jumps into 1:2–locked rotation. The solid red lines in Fig. 3b are the theoretically predicted fr for an adiabatic path through parameter space, with the discrepancy due to imperfect adiabatic control in the experiment.

Applications

For 1:2–locked rotation, the phase lag ϕ between the drive and the rotation is

ϕ=arccos π 2 V N - 2 π f d I Γ ;
(2)

it depends upon gas pressure pg through Γ and on laser power P through V and N. The requirement that this phase is real defines the shaded region in Fig. 3a. The phase ϕ is sensitive to non-conservative forces, such as light or gas scattering.

A lock-in amplifier is used to monitor ϕ (see “Methods” section), yielding real-time readout of phase variations. For a constant laser power P, measuring the phase amounts to local sensing of the gas pressure pg, as shown in Fig. 4b. We achieve a relative pressure sensitivity of 0.3%, which is currently limited only by the intensity noise of the fiber amplifier. This sensitivity may still be improved by five to six orders of magnitude by stabilizing the power33. This shows the great potential of our system as a pressure sensor. The fine spatial resolution provided by the micrometer-sized rotor could allow, for instance, mapping of velocity fields and turbulences in rarefied gas flows or atomic beams.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Sensing applications. a At 4 mbar, the locking frequency f d can be continuously tuned by over 800 kHz, which corresponds to almost 1012 linewidths. The peaks in the PSD differ in amplitude since for short recording times they are not fully resolved. b In this parameter region the phase lag (black dots) between the rotor and the drive depends linearly on pressure (fitted red line) and thus can be used for precise pressure sensing. The pressure values are given by the reading of a commercial pressure Gauge (Pfeiffer Vacuum PCR 280), and the shaded region is the error margin as defined by the manufacturer-given resolution and repeatability of the Gauge

The driven nanorod is sensitive to externally applied torques through Eq. (1). In analogy to the pressure sensing application, the phase between the drive and the driven rotation of the locked rotor provides a real-time readout with a bandwidth of 100 kHz set by the lock-in amplifier. From Eq. (2), the torque sensitivity can be estimated as 2.4 × 10−22 Nm for our current experimental parameters, which at room temperature would be the highest value achieved in state of the art systems8, and which could also be significantly improved by laser power stabilization. This sensitivity can be reached for any non-conservative force, that varies on a timescale longer than 1/fd. The bandwidth and sensitivity of this sensor for arbitrary torques warrants further investigation.

Discussion

In conclusion, we have presented a technique for locking the rotation of a levitated nanomechanical rotor to a stable frequency reference, leading to a high mechanical frequency stability which can be used for instantaneous, highly sensitive local measurements of pressure or torque. One great advantage of the locked nanorotor over nanomechanical resonators is the absence of an intrinsic resonance frequency. By varying fd we can tune the rotation frequency over almost 1012 linewidths while retaining its stability, as shown in Fig. 4a, circumventing the low bandwidth that naturally comes with highly sensitive resonant detectors. Measuring a phase lag rather than a frequency shift allows us to monitor force variations in real time, bypassing the inherent growth in measurement time that comes with decreasing linewidth in a resonant sensor.

Our system is sensitive to non-conservative forces, such as those due to photon absorption or emission, shear forces in gas flows, radiation pressures in light fields, optical potentials, mass and size variations of the rod due to gas accommodation, and local pressure and temperature variations in the gas. Employing higher optical powers, larger duty cycles of the drive, or lower gas pressures will increase the sensing range by a factor of more than ten, while retaining the exquisite sensitivity. The stability of the locked nanorotor may be further increased by driving it with a more stable clock. By reaching ultra high vacuum, this technique may also be suited to prepare quantum coherent rotational dynamics34, for which the high frequency stability may be exploited.

Methods

Nanorod trapping

A silicon nanorod of length = 725 ± 15  nm and diameter d = (130 ± 13) nm (with mass M = 2.2 × 10−17 kg) is trapped at a pressure of pg = 4 mbar, using light of total power P = 1.35 W with RMS power fluctuations of 0.3%. Our method of producing and trapping the nanorods is described in refs. 29, 35. The motion is monitored by placing a 1 mm core multimode fiber less than 100 μm from the trapped nanorod, which collects the light that the nanoparticle scatters, yielding information about all translational and rotational degrees of freedom.

Rotation analysis

In order to record a time series as long as 4 days we mix down the scattered light with a local oscillator at frequency fLO such that the rotational motion signal of the rod is shifted to a frequency of 190 Hz (Fig. 1a) and digitized with a sampling rate of 2 kS s−1. This signal can then be used to calculate the phase noise S ϕ ( f ) =10 log 10 PSD ( f ) ∕PSD f d in units of dBc Hz−1. The drive signal is recorded and analyzed in the same way.

To extract the relative phase ϕ of the nanorod rotation with respect to the drive we use a Stanford Research Systems lock-in amplifier (SR830) which performs a homodyne measurement on the mixed-down 190 Hz scattering signal. For this purpose both the modulation frequency fd and the local oscillator fLO are synced to a common clock.

Rotational dynamics

The rotational motion depends crucially on the damping rate Γ, the radiation torque N, and the laser potential V, through Eq. (1). All three quantities can be evaluated microscopically as detailed in refs. 29, 36. Specifically, the rotational damping rate due to diffuse reflection of gas atoms with mass mg, evaluated in the free molecular regime, is Γ=d p g 2 π m g ( 6 + π ) 8M k B T , where T denotes the gas temperature. The optical torque exerted by a circularly polarized standing wave can be evaluated by approximating the internal polarization field according to the generalized Rayleigh–Gans approximation36 as N=PΔχ 2 d 4 k 3 Δ χ η 1 ( k ) + χ η 2 ( k ) 48c w 0 2 , where k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber, Δχ= χ - χ depends on the two independent components of the susceptibility tensor and η 1 ( k ) =0.872 and η 2 ( k ) =0.11329. In a similar fashion, one obtains for the laser potential V=P d 2 Δχ2c w 0 2 .

The phase lag (2) is obtained by averaging the equation of motion (1) over one driving period 1/fd and exploiting that the motion is 1:2-locked, α ° =π f d while α ¨ =0 and, consequently, α(t) = α0 + πfdt. The phase difference between the polarization change from circular to linear and the maximum scattering signal observed when the rod is oriented orthogonal to the detector (α(t) = π) is ϕ = π − 2α0 leading to Eq. (2).

Data availability

All relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E. & Schmidt, P. O. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637–701 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Vig, J. R. Quartz crystal oscillators and resonators. Technical Report No. SLCET-TR-88-1 (Army Research Laboratory, Fort Monmouth, NJ, USA 1999).

  3. 3.

    Udem, T., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).

  4. 4.

    Mamin, H. J. & Rugar, D. Sub-attonewton force detection at millikelvin temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3358–3360 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Gavartin, E., Verlot, P. & Kippenberg, T. J. A hybrid on-chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensitive force measurements. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 509–514 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Ranjit, G., Atherton, D. P., Stutz, J. H., Cunningham, M. & Geraci, A. A. Attonewton force detection using microspheres in a dual-beam optical trap in high vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 91, 051805 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Kim, P. H. et al. Nanoscale torsional optomechanics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 053102 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Kim, P. H., Hauer, B. D., Doolin, C., Souris, F. & Davis, J. P. Approaching the standard quantum limit of mechanical torque sensing. Nat. Commun. 7, 13165 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Krause, A. G., Winger, M., Blasius, T. D., Lin, Q. & Painter, O. A high-resolution microchip optomechanical accelerometer. Nat. Photonics 6, 768–772 (2012).

  10. 10.

    Teufel, J. D., Donner, T., Castellanos-Beltran, M. A., Harlow, J. W. & Lehnert, K. W. Nanomechanical motion measured with an imprecision below that at the standard quantum limit. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 820–823 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Wilson, D. J. et al. Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate. Nature 524, 325–329 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Cleland, A. & Roukes, M. A nanometre-scale mechanical electrometer. Nature 392, 160–162 (1998).

  13. 13.

    Chaste, J. et al. A nanomechanical mass sensor with yoctogram resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 301–304 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Liu, F., Alaie, S., Leseman, Z. C. & Hossein-Zadeh, M. Sub-pg mass sensing and measurement with an optomechanical oscillator. Opt. Express 21, 19555–19567 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Norte, R. A., Moura, J. P. & Gröblacher, S. Mechanical resonators for quantum optomechanics experiments at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147202 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Tsaturyan, Y., Barg, A., Polzik, E. S. & Schliesser, A. Ultra-coherent nanomechanical resonators via soft clamping and dissipation dilution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 776–783 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Ghaffari, S. et al. Quantum limit of quality factor in silicon micro and nano mechanical resonators. Sci. Rep. 3, 3244 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Hossein-Zadeh, M. & Vahala, K. J. Observation of injection locking in an optomechanical RF oscillator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 191115 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Coppock, J. E., Nagornykh, P., Murphy, J. P. J. & Kane, B. E. Phase locking of the rotation of a graphene nanoplatelet to an RF electric field in a quadrupole ion trap. In Proc. SPIE 9922, Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation XIII 99220E (2016).

  20. 20.

    Feng, X. L., White, C. J., Hajimiri, A. & Roukes, M. L. A self-sustaining ultrahigh-frequency nanoelectromechanical oscillator. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 342–346 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Villanueva, L. G. et al. A nanoscale parametric feedback oscillator. Nano Lett. 11, 5054–5059 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Cirio, M., Brennen, G. K. & Twamley, J. Quantum magnetomechanics: ultrahigh-q-levitated mechanical oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 147206 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Gieseler, J., Deutsch, B., Quidant, R. & Novotny, L. Subkelvin parametric feedback cooling of a laser-trapped nanoparticle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 103603 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Yin, Z.-Q., Geraci, A. A. & Li, T. Optomechanics of levitated dielectric particles. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 27, 1330018 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Kiesel, N. et al. Cavity cooling of an optically levitated submicron particle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14180–14185 (2013).

  26. 26.

    Neukirch, L. P. & Vamivakas, A. N. Nano-optomechanics with optically levitated nanoparticles. Contemp. Phys. 56, 48–62 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Millen, J., Fonseca, P. Z. G., Mavrogordatos, T., Monteiro, T. S. & Barker, P. F. Cavity cooling a single charged levitated nanosphere. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 123602 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Hoang, T. M. et al. Torsional optomechanics of a levitated nonspherical nanoparticle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123604 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Kuhn, S. et al. Full rotational control of levitated silicon nanorods. Optica 4, 356–360 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Chang, D. E. et al. Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1005–1010 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Tong, L., Miljković, V. D. & Käll, M. Alignment, rotation, and spinning of single plasmonic nanoparticles and nanowires using polarization dependent optical forces. Nano Lett. 10, 268–273 (2009).

  32. 32.

    Arita, Y., Mazilu, M. & Dholakia, K. Laser-induced rotation and cooling of a trapped microgyroscope in vacuum. Nat. Commun. 4, 2374 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Kwee, P., Willke, B. & Danzmann, K. New concepts and results in laser power stabilization. Appl. Phys. B 102, 515–522 (2011).

  34. 34.

    Shi, H. & Bhattacharya, M. Optomechanics based on angular momentum exchange between light and matter. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 49, 153001 (2016).

  35. 35.

    Kuhn, S. et al. Cavity-assisted manipulation of freely rotating silicon nanorods in high vacuum. Nano Lett. 15, 5604–5608 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Stickler, B. A. et al. Ro-translational cavity cooling of dielectric rods and disks. Phys. Rev. A 94, 033818 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in the projects P27297 and DK-CoQuS (W1210). We acknowledge support by S. Puchegger and the faculty center for nanostructure research at the University of Vienna in imaging the nanorods. J.M. acknowledges funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 654532. F.P. acknowledges the Legacy Program (Israel Science Foundation) for its support.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, VCQ, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria

    • Stefan Kuhn
    • , Markus Arndt
    •  & James Millen
  2. University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße 1, 47048, Duisburg, Germany

    • Benjamin A. Stickler
    •  & Klaus Hornberger
  3. School of Chemistry, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, 69978, Israel

    • Alon Kosloff
    •  & Fernando Patolsky

Authors

  1. Search for Stefan Kuhn in:

  2. Search for Benjamin A. Stickler in:

  3. Search for Alon Kosloff in:

  4. Search for Fernando Patolsky in:

  5. Search for Klaus Hornberger in:

  6. Search for Markus Arndt in:

  7. Search for James Millen in:

Contributions

S.K., M.A. and J.M. conceived of and designed the experiment. S.K. and J.M. performed all experiments. S.K., B.A.S. and J.M. analyzed the data. A.K. and F.P. fabricated the nanorods. B.A.S. and K.H. developed all theoretical models. S.K., B.A.S., K.H., M.A. and J.M. contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

Aspects of this work are subject to a filed patent application.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Kuhn.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.