Article | Open

# Imaging spectroscopy of solar radio burst fine structures

• Nature Communicationsvolume 8, Article number: 1515 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01307-8
• Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:

## Abstract

Solar radio observations provide a unique diagnostic of the outer solar atmosphere. However, the inhomogeneous turbulent corona strongly affects the propagation of the emitted radio waves, so decoupling the intrinsic properties of the emitting source from the effects of radio wave propagation has long been a major challenge in solar physics. Here we report quantitative spatial and frequency characterization of solar radio burst fine structures observed with the Low Frequency Array, an instrument with high-time resolution that also permits imaging at scales much shorter than those corresponding to radio wave propagation in the corona. The observations demonstrate that radio wave propagation effects, and not the properties of the intrinsic emission source, dominate the observed spatial characteristics of radio burst images. These results permit more accurate estimates of source brightness temperatures, and open opportunities for quantitative study of the mechanisms that create the turbulent coronal medium through which the emitted radiation propagates.

## Introduction

During sporadic periods of activity, the Sun produces the largest magnetic energy release events in the solar system: solar flares and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Flares emit radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum from gamma- and X-rays1 to radio waves2. Solar radio bursts originate from the acceleration of electrons in the relatively tenuous (electron number density $n≲1 0 8$ cm−3) solar corona, a region that, because of its low plasma density, produces very low, and hence undetectable, levels of X-ray and Extreme Ultra-Violet (EUV) emission. The radio bursts produced in such regions are, however, easily observable and thus provide unique diagnostics of electron acceleration and propagation in the outer corona and surrounding heliosphere. They provide information on the impulsive initial evolution of solar eruptions, information that is essential to the overall understanding of such events and hence to developing an effective system of space weather prediction and mitigation.

Most of the brightest solar radio bursts are due to coherent radio plasma emission processes:3 the injection of non-thermal electrons into the solar corona leads to the generation of Langmuir plasma waves through the electron-electron two-stream instability3, and these plasma waves are converted into radio emission at both the plasma (fundamental) $f p e ≃9×1 0 - 3 n cm - 3$ MHz and second-harmonic (f H = 2f pe) frequencies. Radio bursts produced by electrons moving away from the Sun along open magnetic field lines are known as Type III bursts. The fine frequency structures, so-called Type IIIb bursts, are commonly believed to be caused by density inhomogeneities in the background plasma4,5. The radiation propagates through the solar corona where it is both refracted6 and scattered by turbulent plasma processes7,8, hence understanding these propagation effects is critical to a correct interpretation of solar radio burst images9,10,11. Because coherent plasma emission produces radio waves at frequencies close to the local plasma frequency11,12,13, propagation effects are particularly significant and must therefore be carefully considered in determining both the intrinsic properties of the surrounding plasma (e.g., density, magnetic field, density gradient, and turbulence) and of the emitting high-energy electron beams (e.g., location, energy).

High-time resolution one-dimensional scans14 or single-frequency images15 have demonstrated that Type III radio sources expand with time. This could (for such single-frequency observations) be due to either propagation effects or intrinsic variations in the structure of the Type III burst15,16,17. Further, imaging observations with the Culgoora radioheliograph18,19 have also revealed an interesting enigma for the events at the limb: sources of fundamental emission are radially shifted outwards with respect to harmonic emission (and hence are apparently situated at different heights in the solar atmosphere), although the physics of the responsible coherent plasma emission mechanism requires that they are produced cospatially3. This is particularly puzzling, since the refraction of radio waves shifts sources radially inwards and, since the fundamental component is refracted more than the second-harmonic component, the fundamental component should appear lower19. Although a variety of possible resolutions of this paradox have been presented20,21, a possible resolution that is consistent with the observed increase in source size with time involves radio wave propagation effects9,11, which could10,22,23 shift the observed positions of fundamental radiation upward (radially outward). However, to date there have been no observations that permit the decoupling of propagation effects from intrinsic source variations, and hence there has been no quantitative assessment of the reasons behind this paradox.

Here we report imaging spectroscopy observations of fine frequency structures associated with a solar radio burst24. These observations with high spatial and temporal resolution demonstrate radio wave propagation effects in the solar corona.

## Results

### Overview of the observations

The radio burst on 2015 April 16 around 11:57 UT was simultaneously observed by one of the largest decameter arrays, the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR)25 and by the URAN-226 (Ukrainian Radio interferometer of National Academy of Sciences). The latter provides corroborating observations at other frequencies, polarization information, and valuable cross-calibration for the LOFAR observations between 30 and 32 MHz.

The dynamic spectrum (radio flux in the frequency-time plane; Fig. 1) shows two main burst components, each characterized by a rapid decrease in frequency with time; the first burst passes through 20 MHz at $≃$11:57:00 UT and is followed a few seconds later by another burst which passes through 20 MHz at $≃$11:57:04 UT. The first burst is radiation at the fundamental plasma frequency, while the second burst is harmonic emission from the same electron beam forming a so-called type IIIb-type III pair27,28 (for example, at 11:57:00 UT the emission in the first burst is concentrated at frequencies around 20 MHz while the emission in the second burst is concentrated around 40 MHz.)

The Type III burst in this event is rather typical;19,28 for example, the peak flux density between 32 and 40 MHz is 100–200 solar flux units (sfu) (1 sfu = 10−22 J s−1 m−2 Hz−1), and it has circular polarizations of ~15% and <5% for the fundamental and harmonic components, respectively. The rapid downward drift of frequency with time is a defining characteristic of solar Type III bursts;19 it results from the rapidly decreasing ambient density (and hence decreasing plasma frequency away from the Sun) as the emitting electron beam propagates upward through the decreasing density of the solar atmosphere. Since the plasma frequency $f∝ n 1 ∕ 2$, it follows that $( 1 ∕ f ) df∕dt= ( 1 ∕ 2 n ) dn∕dt= ( 1 ∕ 2 ) ( dln ( n ) ∕ d r ) ( d r ∕ d t ) =v∕2L$, where $L= ( dln ( n ) ∕ d r ) - 1$ is the density scale height and v = dr/dt is the vertical component of the velocity of the exciting electron beam. Using the Newkirk29 density model of the solar corona as a typical model, the characteristic density scale height is $L≃0.3 R ⊙ ≃2×1 0 10$ cm at a level in the atmosphere corresponding to plasma frequencies around 32 MHz. Therefore, the observed frequency drift rate $df∕dt≃7$ MHz s−1 at the f = 32 MHz point in the fundamental frequency burst component corresponds to $v= ( 2 L ∕ f ) ( d f ∕ d t ) ≃1 0 10 cm s - 1 ≃c∕3$, where c is the speed of light. The speed c/3 is a typical speed for the  ~ 30 keV electrons that excite Type III bursts19,30.

The expanded view in Fig. 1 shows that the fundamental component of the burst consists of multiple fine-structured striae; such fine structure is the characteristic signature of Type IIIb bursts24 (the number of striae increases with decreasing frequency, so that below ~30 MHz, the frequency structure of the burst looks quasi-continuous). These fine frequency structures are believed to be due to small-scale density fluctuations4,28,31,32 that modulate the resulting radio emission; they have full width at half-maximum (FWHM) durations around 1 s at a given frequency (Fig. 1). The presence of these fine striae in the fundamental component of the burst provides an estimate of the characteristic size of the emitting volume (intrinsic emission source size), which can then (see below) be compared to the source sizes obtained from direct imaging in order to evaluate the effects of radio wave propagation on the observed source size. Specifically, the individual striae (see the zoomed-in dynamic spectrum in Fig. 1) have FWHM frequency widths Δf ~ 0.3 MHz. Although the relationship between Δf and the size of the radio emitting source is model dependent5, and in particular depends on the angle between the direction of beam propagation and the direction of the density gradient, an order-of-magnitude estimation based on the plasma emission mechanism suggests that the limited frequency range corresponds to a vertical extent $Δr≃2L ( Δ f ∕ f ) ≃4×1 0 8$ cm. We note this would be the size of a density inhomogeneity leading to an enhanced level of Langmuir waves, while the electron beam generating the Langmuir waves is extended over a much larger distance4,31. Such a characteristic size of the fundamental emitting source extends over an angle $θ≃0.1$ arcmin at the Sun and hence subtends a very small solid angle ($Ω≃1 0 - 2$ arcmin2) on the sky. The harmonic emission is likely to form over a much larger region in physical space33, a feature that is also evident from the dynamic spectra—the fundamental component has clear striae, but the harmonic is rather smooth.

### Imaging

LOFAR imaging observations were made using 24-core Low Band Antenna stations with tied-array beam forming25,34,35,36,37, an observing mode that provides images with sub-second time resolution and unprecedented frequency resolution in order to resolve the individual striae in the Type IIIb burst. The array of 127 tied-array beams cover the sky out to $~2 R ⊙$ with a mosaic beam spacing of  ~ 0.1 degrees. We note that tied-array mosaic imaging is different from the traditional method of producing images from interferometric visibilities. The LOFAR core size of $D≃3.5$ km provides an angular resolution $λ∕D≃9$ arcmin at 32 MHz (wavelength λ = 9.4 m) and the dirty beam FWHM area A LOFAR was $≃110$ arcmin2 at the time of the observation. The flux was calibrated against the Crab nebula both before and after the burst observations; in addition, the Sun-integrated flux was compared with URAN-2 data, which showed agreement within a factor of  ~ 2. The temporal modulation of the URAN-2 flux also demonstrated excellent agreement with the observed fine frequency structures, excluding instrumental effects.

The imaging of the radio emission was performed with time resolution $≃$50 ms, during which radio waves propagate a distance of only  ~ 1.5 × 109 cm $≃0.3$ arcmin, allowing us to accurately track variations in both the location and the areal extent of the source on sub-second timescales. For each 12 kHz-wide frequency channel we fitted an elliptical Gaussian to the LOFAR images. The ellipse centroid position (which is determined to an accuracy significantly better than the angular resolution of a single beam measurement38) and the FWHM area of each source were estimated for all frequency channels during the radio burst (Fig. 2). Figure 3 shows the size and centroid positions (with uncertainties) of both fundamental (F) and harmonic (H) images for a typical stria near 32 MHz; the FWHM areas are A F ~ 400 arcmin2 for the fundamental and A H ~ 600 arcmin2 for the harmonic. The accuracy of determining the source position and area is variable, depending on the emission flux (Methods section), and near the burst peak they can be as high as  ± 0.1 arcmin for the position and  ± 5 arcmin2 for the area (see Fig. 4). The areas and area uncertainties are well above the LOFAR resolution limit and hence the radio sources are reliably resolved (Methods section). The radio source sizes corrected for the LOFAR beam, $A { F , H } - A LOFAR$, are both four orders of magnitude larger than the emission region size $Ω~1 0 - 2$ arcmin2 as determined above from considerations of the fine frequency width of individual burst striae.

Figure 3 shows the temporal evolution of the centroid location, and the areal extent, of the fundamental and harmonic sources (both observed at a frequency of 32.5 MHz, so that the H-radiation is produced in a region with a density one-fourth that of the region emitting the fundamental—and a few seconds later, when the emission at the fundamental frequency has drifted downward to 16.25 MHz). The centroid of the fundamental frequency radiation moves in a direction roughly parallel to the local solar radius (i.e., north-west in the plane-of-image; see full-disk image in Fig. 3), whereas the centroid of the source of harmonic radiation moves in a roughly transverse direction. The motion of F and H sources due to frequency drift between 38 and 32 MHz caused by electron transport is shown in Fig. 5. Figure 4 shows the time evolution of the radial centroid positions and areas in the X–Y plane, for both F and H components (Fig. 3). The areal expansion of both F and H components is most pronounced during the decay of the burst. This is consistent with various wave scattering models6,10,11, although these models predict different motions and growth rates of the source, depending on the assumed emission and scattering anisotropies39. Therefore, we focus on times during the decay and estimate the radial velocity in the X-Y plane and areal expansion rate by fitting linear expressions $r ( x , y ) = r 0 + ( d r ∕ d t ) ( t - t 0 ) ,A= A 0 + ( d A ∕ d t ) ( t - t 0 )$ during the time intervals shown by the shaded regions in Fig. 4. The centroid of the F-emission moves radially outward at an average speed $dr∕dt≃1.8arcmin s - 1 ≃c∕4$, while its area A F grows from  ~ 420 arcmin2 to  ~ 530 arcmin2 within  ~ 0.6 sec, an average areal expansion rate $d A F ∕dt≃180$ arcmin2 s−1. On the other hand, the centroid of the harmonic component shows negligible radial motion, while its area A H grows from  ~ 600 arcmin2 to ~ 760 arcmin2 over  ~ 3 s. The average areal expansion rate is $d A H ∕dt≃50$ arcmin2 s−1, about one-fourth the areal expansion rate for the fundamental component.

We repeated this analysis for 48 well-observed striae in frequency channels between 32 and 38 MHz (Fig. 6). We excluded frequencies below 32 MHz where the striae start to overlap and images above 38 MHz due to low signal-to-noise ratio. Figure 6 shows that for all well-resolved striae, the rate of areal expansion of the fundamental source is ~(2–4) times greater than the expansion rate for the harmonic source.

Individual striae start at different times within the Type IIIb burst (Fig. 1). Each stria also initially appears at a different location on the solar disk within a broad envelope of the Type IIIb burst (Methods section). However, nearly all stria sources move radially while the harmonic component at the same frequency behaves in a completely different manner. This allows us to exclude refraction effects in the Earth’s ionosphere as an explanation for the observed motion of the fundamental stria component. Further, the very similar expansion rates inferred from observations in 235 different frequency channels, at 48 different striae spread over 2 s (larger than  ~ 1 s duration of a stria) allow us to infer with a high degree of confidence that observed regions of fundamental radiation expand faster than regions of harmonic radiation. As we argue next, this result is not supported by any reasonable variation in the intrinsic source sizes in existing models2, but is consistent with propagation-scattering effects.

An intrinsic variation of source size with time at a given frequency requires that the emitting source grows in time as larger and larger iso-density surfaces start to emit17. However, in order to produce the observed striae, which are very narrow in frequency and large in imaged sources, such a model would require two essential features. Firstly, the emitting region is distributed over a thin but large (and changing) volume, all at the same plasma frequency and thus density; any density inhomogeneities would have to be always parallel to iso-frequency surfaces, and secondly, the positions of the stria, which originate at different locations, have nearly identical centroid motions. Moreover, in such a scenario, the expansion rate is related to the structure of the iso-density surface and it is challenging to explain why the expansion has a similar rate at all frequencies, or equivalently why all the iso-density surfaces, which are spread over a height range $~0.2 R ⊙$, expand at nearly identical rates. Finally, such a model does not explain why the centroids of the fundamental and harmonic components behave differently. Therefore, we reach the rather inescapable conclusions that the emitting sources most probably have sizes comparable to the inhomogeneity scale; they are randomly located within the corona and are responsible for the individual striae; and that the observed extent of the radio burst is primarily determined not by the size of the emitting region but rather by wave propagation effects in the surrounding atmosphere.

### Radio wave propagation

A simple model6,11 for multiple scattering off density inhomogeneities does indeed produce a (linear) increase in the area of a source (in solid angle units) with time (see Equation 64 from11): $d < θ 2 > d t ∝ f p e 4 f 4 1 μ 4 ⟨ δ n ⟩ 2 n 2 ℓ$, where $⟨δ n ⟩ 2$ is the rms level of density fluctuations, l is the density inhomogeneity scale11,40, and μ is the refractive index. For a fully ionized plasma, $μ 2 ( f ) =1- f p e 2 ∕ f 2$ is frequency dependent, so the rate of areal increase for radiation near the plasma frequency will always be larger than that for radiation at the harmonic frequency, qualitatively consistent with the observations in Fig. 6. As the waves propagate away from the source into regions of lower density (and so lower plasma frequency), the (local) plasma frequency f pe becomes progressively smaller than the wave frequency f, the refractive index approaches unity for both fundamental and harmonic radiation, and the expansion rate $∝ f p e 4 ∕ μ 4$ is greatly reduced. The location of the radio source is  ~ 7 arcmin from the solar disk center, so the short temporal extent (average FWHM $Δt≃1.1$ s) of the striae constrains the radio wave broadening along the line of sight direction to be less than $cΔt≃3×1 0 10$ cm $≃8$ arcmin. Since the perpendicular to line of sight size (~20 arcmin on the plane of the sky) is larger than the line of sight 8 arcmin size, the combined effect of scattering and emission directivity3 is likely to be anisotropic, with the dominant effect being perpendicular to the line-of-sight direction. While both the fundamental and harmonic regions expand, the fundamental source is also radially moving, and this suggests a rather small intrinsic source size for the fundamental emission and a somewhat larger intrinsic source size for the harmonic emission. Indeed, the harmonic emission source is  ~ 1.4 times larger than the fundamental (Fig. 4).

## Discussion

We have reported imaging spectroscopy observations of fine frequency structures in solar Type III radio bursts. The high frequency-time resolution of these observations have allowed us to image the radio waves as they emerge from the solar atmosphere.

The observed sources have linear extents, corrected for the finite size of the LOFAR beam, of $~ ( A F - A LOFAR ) ≃ ( 17 - 22 )$ arcmin near the peak of the fundamental component (Fig. 4). The source sizes are very similar to the average source sizes $≃$20 arcmin inferred for Type III bursts at 43 MHz19 and are much larger than the intrinsic emission source sizes ~0.1 arcmin deduced from the appearance of fine temporal substructures within the burst. The simulations of LOFAR response (Methods section) show the small source required by plasma emission cannot explain the LOFAR observations. We have also found that the areal extent of the fundamental component grows more rapidly than the harmonic component, consistent with a model involving scattering off density inhomogeneities. The measured expansion rates (Fig. 6), as well as the sub-second fundamental source motion, provide valuable information on the fibreous structure of the corona10 and on the (currently poorly known) characteristics of the density turbulence spectrum6,11.

Because the intrinsic source size is so much smaller than the apparent source sizes, the brightness temperature of the source must be similarly ($A F ∕Ω~1 0 4$) larger than that obtained using the apparent source areas. A flux of 100 solar flux units at the fundamental frequency corresponds to a brightness temperature ~1014 K, which is larger than what is typically assumed2 and interestingly close to the maximum brightness temperatures observed for type III solar radio bursts33.

These results also resolve a long-standing problem in solar radio astronomy—why the fundamental and harmonic sources, which result from the same physical process, do not generally appear to coincide spatially (Figs. 2 and 3). Because propagation effects result in a large increase in source size with time, the apparent source locations of the F and H sources are controlled primarily by these propagation-scattering effects, rather than by properties of the underlying emitting sources. We encourage further tests of this conclusion through analysis of radio data in different frequency bands.

The differential rates of propagation of F and H-radiation can easily lead, within a modest time, to a systematic displacement of the apparent source centroids, which Fig. 3 shows to be in the radial direction.

These observations also allow new testing and improvement of radio wave propagation models10,11,13 in turbulent coronal plasma, tests that have hitherto not been available for the solar corona40. In particular, since the areal expansion coefficient is proportional to the size of the density fluctuations, this provides a diagnostic of the latter quantity and opens up previously unavailable opportunities for further study of various manifestations of solar activity, such as flares, coronal mass ejections and formation of the solar wind.

## Methods

### Polarization

The Sun-integrated flux densities observed by LOFAR and URAN-2 described above have been compared in Fig. 7. Polarization measured by URAN-2 is given for the same frequency.

### Radio source position and size

The imaging has been performed for 48 individual stria in 235 frequency channels and is shown in Fig. 5. The LOFAR observations were made using 24-core Low Band Antenna stations using tied-array beam forming images with sub-second time resolution. The array of 127 tied-array beams, which are the coherent sum of all the station beams, covered the Sun with  ~ 6 arcmin spacing (the data are publicly available via http://lofar.target.rug.nl). Each LOFAR beam measures the flux F i for a given position on the sky given by $x i b$, $y i b$ in heliocentric coordinates. Figure 2 shows the locations of the beams on the solar disk. The measured flux F i recorded by LOFAR is a convolution of a LOFAR beam point spread function (Fig. 8) and the true source. The positions and the flux values for each beam allow us to reconstruct the images. Iteratively finding the highest value in the array of F i , 1% of the maximum convolved with a point spread function (Fig. 8) has been subtracted from all F i until the highest value is smaller than 5% of the initial maximum. The resulting cleaned image41,42 is shown in Fig. 9. Figure 9 also compares the result of simulated LOFAR images.

In principle, one can apply the cleaning procedure to thousands of images, and then deduce the measured source parameters. However, because we are interested in the characteristic size and source position only, such an extensive calculation effort seems unjustified. Instead, we determine the areal extent and subtract the LOFAR dirty beam area. The side-lobes do not exceed 10%, so the images are weakly affected by cleaning at half-maximum level (the top right (cleaned) image looks similar to the top left (dirty) image at 50% level in Fig. 9). The simulations in Fig. 9 also demonstrate that small $≃1$ arcmin sources are inconsistent with the data.

To determine the size and the position of the source, we fit an elliptical Gaussian $S ( x , y ) = S 0 exp ( - x ′ 2 ∕ 2 σ x 2 - y ′ 2 ∕ 2 σ y 2 )$, where $x ′ = ( x - x s ) cos ( T ) - ( y - y s ) sin ( T )$ and $y ′ = ( x - x s ) sin ( T ) + ( y - y s ) cos ( T )$, where T is the rotation from the x axis, in the clockwise direction. Minimizing $χ 2$

$χ 2 = ∑ i = 1 N ( F i - S ( x i b , y i b ; S 0 , x s , y s , σ x , σ y , T ) ) 2 δ F 2 ,$

we find the Gaussian parameters for each moment of time and frequency. The inferred parameters are as follows: S 0 is the peak amplitude, x s , y s are the coordinates of the central source position, $σ x , σ y$ are the rms lengths, T is the rotation of the ellipse from the x axis. The background flux level before the burst for each frequency and beam was taken as the uncertainties on the flux δF (typically around 1 sfu). The resulting fitted Gaussian gives the source size (convolved with the LOFAR beam). The half-maximum area of the fit gives the areal extent of the source. Since we are interested in the position and the areal extent of the source we provide the expressions for the errors. The errors δx s , δy s for the source position (x s , y s ) can be written38

$δ x s ≈ 2 π σ x σ y δ F S 0 h,δ y s ≈ 2 π σ y σ x δ F S 0 h,$

where h is the angular resolution. For weakly elliptical source $σ x ~ σ y$ as presented in Fig. 2, the uncertainty on the source position gives $δ y s ≃δ x s ~0.1$ arcmin for the fundamental ( ~ 120 sfu) and $δ x s ≃δ y s ~0.6$ arcmin for the harmonic since the harmonic ( ~ 17 sfu) has 5–6 times lower flux near the peak of each component (Fig. 4).

Similarly, the error on the source half-maximum area A can be estimated

$δ A A ≈2 δ F S 0 h A$

For example, the error on the area becomes $δA∕A~$ 5% for harmonic near the peak shown in Fig. 4. The above expressions show that the accurate determination of the source positions and the areas becomes available due to high signal to noise ratios F i /δF. We further note that the results do not imply that the source has a Gaussian shape, but show that the multi-beaming measurements can provide estimates of the position better that the resolution of the instrument and the area measurements better than ’dirty’ beam half-maximum area.

### Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the LOFAR Long Term Archive, http://lofar.target.rug.nl/ and https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/ or available from the authors upon request.

## Additional information

Change history: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Change history

• ### Correction 11 January 2018

The original version of this article contained errors in Refs 15, 27, 32, 33 and 43, which were incorrectly given with the wrong journal name “Solid Phys.” rather than the correct “Sol. Phys.”. This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the article.

## References

1. 1.

Holman, G. D. et al. Implications of x-ray observations for electron acceleration and propagation in solar flares. Space Sci. Rev. 159, 107–166 (2011).

2. 2.

Pick, M. & Vilmer, N. Sixty-five years of solar radioastronomy: flares, coronal mass ejections and sun earth connection. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 16, 1–153 (2008).

3. 3.

Melrose, D. B. Plasma Astrophysics. Nonthermal Processes in Diffuse Magnetized Plasmas. (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1980).

4. 4.

Takakura, T. & Yousef, S. Type IIIb radio bursts - 80 MHz source position and theoretical model. Solar Phys. 40, 421–438 (1975).

5. 5.

Melrose, D. B. in Solar Radio Storms, (eds Benz, A. O. & Zlobec, P.) 182 (CESRA Workshop #4, (1982).

6. 6.

Steinberg, J. L., Aubier-Giraud, M., Leblanc, Y. & Boischot, A. Coronal scattering, absorption and refraction of solar radiobursts. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 362 (1971).

7. 7.

Fokker, A. D. Coronal scattering of radiation from solar radio sources. Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands 18, 111 (1965).

8. 8.

Riddle, A. C. On the observation of scattered radio emission from sources in the solar corona. Solar Phys. 35, 153–169 (1974).

9. 9.

Stewart, R. T. Relative positions of fundamental and second harmonic type iii bursts. Proc. Astron. Soc. Austr. 2, 100 (1972).

10. 10.

Robinson, R. D. Scattering of radio waves in the solar corona. Proc. Astron. Soc. Austr. 5, 208–211 (1983).

11. 11.

Arzner, K. & Magun, A. Radiowave propagation in a statistically inhomogeneous plasma. Astron. Astrophys. 351, 1165–1189 (1999).

12. 12.

Bastian, T. S. Angular scattering of solar radio emission by coronal turbulence. Astrophys. J. 426, 774–781 (1994).

13. 13.

Thejappa, G. & MacDowall, R. J. Effects of Scattering on Radio Emission from the Quiet Sun at Low Frequencies. Astrophys. J. 676, 1338–1345 (2008).

14. 14.

Raoult, A. & Pick, M. Space-time evolution of type iii burst sources observed with the nancay radioheliograph - implications for the size of the emitting source. Astron. Astrophys. 87, 63–67 (1980).

15. 15.

Pick, M. & Ji, S. C. Type III burst sources and electron beam injection. Sol. Phys. 107, 159–165 (1986).

16. 16.

Pick, M., Raoult, A. & Vilmer, N. in Radio Physics of the Sun, Vol. 86 (eds Kundu, M. R. & Gergely, T. E.) 235–240 (IAU Symposium, 1980).

17. 17.

Roelof, E. C. & Pick, M. Type iii radio bursts in a fibrous corona. Astron. Astrophys. 210, 417–424 (1989).

18. 18.

Sheridan, K. V., Labrum, N. R. & Payten, W. J. Multiple-frequency operation of the Culgoora Radioheliograph. Nat. Phys. Sci. 238, 115–116 (1972).

19. 19.

Suzuki, S. & Dulk, G. A. in Solar Radiophysics: Studies of Emission from the Sun at Metre Wavelengths, (eds McLean, D. J. & Labrum, N. R.) 289–332 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1985).

20. 20.

Wu, C. S., Wang, C. B., Yoon, P. H., Zheng, H. N. & Wang, S. Generation of type III solar radio bursts in the low corona by direct amplification. Astrophys. J. 575, 1094–1103 (2002).

21. 21.

Wang, C. B. A Scenario for the fine structures of solar type iiib radio bursts based on electron cyclotron maser emission. Astrophys. J. 806, 34 (2015).

22. 22.

Bastian, T. S., Nitta, N., Kiplinger, A.L. & Dulk, G. A. in Proceedings of Kofu Symposium, 199–202 (NRO Report 360, 1994).

23. 23.

Ingale, M., Subramanian, P. & Cairns, I. Coronal turbulence and the angular broadening of radio sources - the role of the structure function. Mon. Not. Royal. Astron. Soc. 447, 3486–3497 (2015).

24. 24.

de La Noe, J. & Boischot, A. The type III b burst. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 55 (1972).

25. 25.

van Haarlem, M. P. et al. LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. Astron. Astrophys. 556, A2 (2013).

26. 26.

Konovalenko, A. et al. The modern radio astronomy network in Ukraine: UTR-2, URAN and GURT. Exp. Astron. 42, 11–48 (2016).

27. 27.

Abranin, E. P. et al. Harmonic structure of type IIIb and III bursts. Sol. Phys. 62, 145–151 (1979).

28. 28.

Melnik, V. N. et al. in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1206 (eds Chakrabarti, S. K., Zhuk, A. I. & Bisnovatyi-Kogan, G. S.) 445–449 (American Institute of Physics Conference Series, 2010).

29. 29.

Newkirk, G. Jr. The solar corona in active regions and the thermal origin of the slowly varying component of solar radio radiation. Astrophys. J. 133, 983 (1961).

30. 30.

Krupar, V. et al. On the speed and acceleration of electron beams triggering interplanetary type III radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 580, A137 (2015).

31. 31.

Kontar, E. P. Dynamics of electron beams in the solar corona plasma with density fluctuations. Astron. Astrophys. 375, 629–637 (2001).

32. 32.

Reid, H. A. S. & Kontar, E. P. Evolution of the solar flare energetic electrons in the inhomogeneous inner heliosphere. Sol. Phys. 285, 217–232 (2013).

33. 33.

Melrose, D. B. The brightness temperatures of solar type III bursts. Sol. Phys. 120, 369–381 (1989).

34. 34.

Morosan, D. E. et al. LOFAR tied-array imaging of Type III solar radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 568, A67 (2014).

35. 35.

Morosan, D. E. et al. LOFAR tied-array imaging and spectroscopy of solar S bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 580, A65 (2015).

36. 36.

Obrocka, M., Stappers, B. & Wilkinson, P. Localising fast radio bursts and other transients using interferometric arrays. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A69 (2015).

37. 37.

Reid, H. A. S. & Kontar, E. P. Imaging Spectroscopy of Type U and J Solar Radio Bursts with LOFAR. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.07410 (2017).

38. 38.

Condon, J. J. Errors in elliptical gaussian FITS. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 109, 166–172 (1997).

39. 39.

Bougeret, J. L. & Steinberg, J. L. A new scattering process above solar active regions - Propagation in a fibrous medium. Astron. Astrophys. 61, 777–783 (1977).

40. 40.

Sasikumar Raja, K. et al. Amplitude of solar wind density turbulence from 10 to 45 R. J. Geophys. Res. (Space Physics) 121, 11 (2016).

41. 41.

Högbom, J. A. Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 15, 417 (1974).

42. 42.

Klein, U. & Mack, K.-H. in Multi-Feed Systems for Radio Telescopes, Vol. 75 (eds Emerson, D. T. & Payne, J. M.) 318 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 1995).

43. 43.

Lemen, J. R. et al. The atmospheric imaging assembly (aia) on the solar dynamics observatory (sdo). Sol. Phys. 275, 17–40 (2012).

Download references

## Acknowledgements

E.P.K., N.L.S.J. and N.H.B. were supported by a STFC consolidated grant ST/L000741/1. A.G.E. was supported by grant NNX10AT78G from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grant NNX17AI16G, issued through the Office of Heliophysics. A.A.K. was supported in part by the RFBR grant 15-02-03717. B.A. was supported by a STFC studentship grant. The work has benefited from a Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme‘Radiosun’ (PEOPLE-2011-IRSES-295272) and an international team grant (http://www.issibern.ch/teams/lofar/) from ISSI Bern, Switzerland. This paper is based (in part) on data obtained with the International LOFAR25 Telescope (ILT). LOFAR is the Low Frequency Array designed and constructed by ASTRON. It has facilities in several countries, that are owned by various parties (each with their own funding sources), and that are collectively operated by the ILT foundation under a joint scientific policy. The authors are thankful to the SDO/AIA team for the data.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK

• E. P. Kontar
• , B. Alcock
• , N. L. S. Jeffrey
•  & N. H. Bian

• S. Yu

• S. Yu
4. #### Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Irkutsk, 664033, Russia

• A. A. Kuznetsov
5. #### Department of Physics & Astronomy, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101, USA

• A. G. Emslie
6. #### Institute of Radio Astronomy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine

• V. N. Melnik
7. #### Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, 411008, India

• P. Subramanian

### Contributions

E.P.K. has designed and coordinated the investigation. S.Y., A.A.K. and V.N.M. have contributed to the analysis of data and the creation of the figures. A.G.E., B.A., N.L.S.J., N.H.B., P.S. have contributed to the data analysis and the data interpretation. All authors have contributed to writing the manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. P. Kontar.

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.