Article | Open

# Electrical magnetochiral effect induced by chiral spin fluctuations

• Nature Communications 8, Article number: 866 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01094-2
Accepted:
Published online:

## Abstract

Chirality of matter can produce unique responses in optics, electricity and magnetism. In particular, magnetic crystals transmit their handedness to the magnetism via antisymmetric exchange interaction of relativistic origin, producing helical spin orders as well as their fluctuations. Here we report for a chiral magnet MnSi that chiral spin fluctuations manifest themselves in the electrical magnetochiral effect, i.e. the nonreciprocal and nonlinear response characterized by the electrical resistance depending on inner product of current and magnetic field. Prominent electrical magnetochiral signals emerge at specific temperature-magnetic field-pressure regions: in the paramagnetic phase just above the helical ordering temperature and in the partially-ordered topological spin state at low temperatures and high pressures, where thermal and quantum spin fluctuations are conspicuous in proximity of classical and quantum phase transitions, respectively. The finding of the asymmetric electron scattering by chiral spin fluctuations may explore new electromagnetic functionality in chiral magnets.

## Introduction

Transport phenomena related to magnetism, including spin fluctuations and chiral magnetism, provide rich physics and functionalities. For example, antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations are involved in formation of Cooper pairs in the high-temperature superconducting cuprates1, and quantum spin fluctuations break down the Fermi-liquid behaviour2. As for the chiral magnetism, real-space Berry phase related to non-coplanar spin textures with finite scalar spin chirality $χ i j k = S i ⋅ S j × S k$, where S n (n = i, j, k) are adjacent three spins, can produce emergent magnetic field and hence the topological Hall effect3, 4. Despite appreciation of these two concepts, cooperative phenomena from spin fluctuations and spin chirality (C ij  = S i  × S j ) have not fully been explored in charge transport phenomena. For their exploration, we focus on directional nonlinear magnetotransport with the resistance proportional to inner product of magnetic field (B) and current, termed electrical magnetochiral effect (eMChE)5,6,7. The eMChE is one kind of directional magnetotransport phenomena being odd against B, which are generally allowed in noncentrosymmetric systems. Recently, from the viewpoint of not only fundamental physics but also applications, such directional nonlinear transports are investigated, for example, in polar systems such as at interfaces between ferromagnetic metals and nonmagnetic heavy metals8, 9, at surfaces of magnetic and nonmagnetic topological insulator heterostructures10, and in polar bulk semiconductor11. As for chiral system, however, eMChE in chiral magnet has not been explored, and the relationship between eMChE and chiral magnetism remains elusive.

Spin structures and their dynamics in chiral-lattice magnets bear chiral nature due to antisymmetric exchange interactions, such as Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction (D · C ij ); the sign of the DM vector D is intrinsically dependent on the crystalline chirality. As a consequence, the sign of their magnetic chirality, as defined for example by r ij · C ij (r ij being the vector connecting i-th and j-th sites), is macroscopically coherent throughout the crystal, which can make the chirality dependent transport signals macroscopically visible. MnSi of the present focus has the noncentrosymmetric lattice structure, which can exist in two enantiomeric forms: right- and left-handed structures as shown in Fig. 1a. Due to the competition between the ferromagnetic exchange interaction and the DM interaction, there emerge various spin winding structures, whose modulation directions, i.e. magnetic helicity, are determined by handedness of the corresponding lattice structures. Below the magnetic ordering temperature Tc = 29.5 K, the long-period (~18 nm) helical spin structure (Fig. 1b) forms12. In addition, topological spin objects, skyrmions (Fig. 1c), condense in triangular-lattice (skyrmion-lattice state) at 0.1 T B 0.3 T just below Tc13. Above Tc, where the long-range magnetic orders disappear, short-range spin correlations still survive without losing the chiral nature14,15,16,17, as described as $⟨ ( ⟨ C i j ⟩ - C i j ) 2 ⟩$. Strong enhancement of the chiral spin fluctuations around Tc has been theoretically proposed18 and demonstrated by polarized neutron scattering experiments14,15,16,17.

In the following we demonstrate that thermal and quantum spin fluctuations endowed with finite vector spin chirality, i.e. chiral spin fluctuations, produce an eMChE. We find that prominent electrical magnetochiral signals emerge at specific temperature-magnetic field-pressure regions: in the paramagnetic phase just above the helical ordering temperature and in the partially-ordered topological spin state at low temperatures and high pressures, where thermal and quantum spin fluctuations are conspicuous in proximity of classical and quantum phase transitions, respectively.

## Results

### Experimental design for detection of eMChE in MnSi

We found that the chiral spin fluctuations play a key role in the eMChE in MnSi. From the viewpoint of symmetry, eMChE can generally appear in chiral systems. Resistivities with current density j parallel and antiparallel to magnetic field B exhibit different values5,6,7. Resistivity considering eMChE can be described as follows:

$E=ρ 1 + γ ^ R ∕ L B j ⋅ B j.$
(1)

Here, ρ is the linear term of longitudinal resistivity, R and L denote right- and left-handed crystalline chiralities, and $γ ^ R ∕ L$ (B) is the eMChE coefficient being an even function of B. We schematize the current-directional response in MnSi for each experimental configuration in Fig. 1d. Note that Eq. (1) can be transformed to the equivalent form, $j= 1 ρ 1 - γ ^ R ∕ L B E ⋅ B ∕ ρ 2 E$. Under time-reversal operation, the current direction for higher conductance is reversed. Likewise, the higher-conductance direction is opposite for different crystal chiralities; $γ ^ R ( B ) =- γ ^ L ( B )$. Since voltage signals from eMChE are anticipated to be small, enough large current density is required to detect eMChE. In order to increase current density under the limitation of external high-precision current sources, by using focused ion beam (FIB) we fabricated microscale thin plates of MnSi, whose thickness and width are approximately 500 nm and 10 μm, respectively (Fig. 1e). Temperature dependence of resistivities and magnetic phase diagram of thin plate samples resemble those of bulk samples (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1).

### Electrical magnetochiral effect at ambient pressure

First, we show typical profiles of eMChE signals observed in MnSi. Since eMChE appears as a nonlinear transport response in proportion to j2 (Eq. (1)), we measured second harmonic resistivity (ρ2f), which is directly connected to eMChE as $ρ 2 f = ρ 2 γ ^ R ∕ L B j ⋅ B$ (see Supplementary Note 2). The magnetic field and current were applied parallel to [100] direction unless otherwise noted. Figure 2a, b present ρ2f of right- and left-handed MnSi at T = 35 K with current density j = 1.0 × 109 Am−2 and frequency f = 30.5 Hz. The both right- and left-handed crystals were selected from several batches by identifying the handedness in terms of the conversion beam electron diffraction method (see Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 3). In accord with the expected contributions from eMChE, both the field profiles of ρ2f of the right- and left-handed crystals are antisymmetric against B, exhibiting the opposite sign to each other. To further confirm that the observed ρ2f signals stem from eMChE, we measured ρ2f at B = 0.4 T as functions of current density and relative angle θ between B and j both lying in-plane (Fig. 2c, d). Both the j- and θ-dependences obey the expected behaviours from the relation $ρ 2 f = ρ 2 γ ^ R ∕ L B j ⋅ B$; ρ2f is proportional to j and cosθ, respectively. We evaluate $γ ^ R ∕ L$ from the fitting of the angular dependence of ρ2f by the equation $ρ 2 f = ρ 2 γ ^ R ∕ L B j ⋅ B$ (see also the solid line of Fig. 2d for the fitting curve). The magnitude of $γ ^ R ∕ L ( B )$ at B = 0.4 T is 1.8 × 10−13 m2T−1A−1, lying within a range of $γ ^ R ∕ L B$ values reported for non-magnetic chiral materials (~10−8–10−14 m2T−1A−1)7. We note that the observed second harmonic resistivity does not result from Nernst effect, which is proposed as a possible origin of second harmonic resistivity8, 10. While Nernst voltage might be, more or less, generated perpendicular to the magnetic field, the observed angular dependence of ρ2f indicates that the second harmonic voltage is produced parallel to the magnetic field.

Next, we discuss a dominant mechanism of eMChE in MnSi. One mechanism proposed for eMChE in non-magnetic materials is so-called self-field effect5. In this mechanism, eMChE is expected to show B-linear dependence. This is however inconsistent with the present observation that ρ2f is suppressed at high magnetic field as presented in Fig. 2a, b. Another possible mechanism of eMChE is asymmetric electron scatterings by chiral scatterers5. To examine this, we investigate T- and B-dependences of ρ2f. In Fig. 3a, we show a contour mapping of ρ2f in the T-B plane for left-handed MnSi, measured with j = 7.5 × 108 Am−2. We determined the helical-to-ferromagnetic phase boundary and ferromagnetic-to-paramagnetic crossover line from kinks in B-dependence of the planar Hall resistivity19 and inflection points of ρ − T curve, respectively. Second harmonic resistivity becomes prominent in the paramagnetic region, showing the broad peak profile in the T-B plane just above the phase boundary (helical-to-paramagnetic) and the crossover line (ferromagnetic-to-paramagnetic). In contrast, the signal suddenly declines with entering the long-range ordering phases. These behaviours are exemplified by the T-scan of ρ2f at B = 0.4 T as shown in Fig. 3b; the magnitude of ρ2f exhibits its maximum near Tc, and shows sharper decrease at the side of helical phase than at the side of paramagnetic phase. Here, we defined the transition temperature for the helical ordering as the temperature where ρ − T curve shows an inflection (see Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). We note that ρ2f for right-handed MnSi qualitatively shows similar T- and B-dependences to ρ2f for left-handed MnSi, apart from the reversed sign (see Supplementary Fig. 3 for a contour mapping of ρ2f for right-handed MnSi and Supplementary Note 4). The above results indicate that eMChE in MnSi is related to the strongly enhanced chiral spin fluctuations around and immediately above Tc14,15,16,17, which should induce asymmetric electron scatterings. This scattering process of spin-polarized conduction electrons may share the common microscopic mechanism with asymmetric scatterings of polarized neutrons by chiral spin fluctuations14,15,16,17. It is worth noting here that eMChE is also observed at the phase boundary between the conical and skyrmion-lattice states (see Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 5).

### Electrical magnetochiral effect in partial order phase

Up to this point, we have revealed that the eMChE in MnSi arises from thermal spin fluctuations enhanced in the vicinity of the helical order as well as of the skyrmion-lattice phase. Next, we investigate the possible effect of quantum spin fluctuations on eMChE. In bulk samples of MnSi, the long-range static helical order is suppressed under pressure, and disappears at a pressure of p = 14.6 kbar20,21,22, where the quantum phase transition occurs and consequently the quantum spin fluctuations become dominant. Even above the pressure for this quantum phase transition, there exists a dynamical topological magnetic order, which fluctuates on time scales between 10−10 and 10−11 s20,21,22. Since this dynamical magnetic order, called partial order (PO), is promoted by quantum fluctuations, the investigation of eMChE in the PO state will provide us with insight into effects of quantum chiral spin fluctuations. In Fig. 4a, we show p-T phase diagram determined from T-dependence of resistivity and topological Hall resistivity $ρ y x THE$ (for the experimental details, see Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Note 6). The emergence of $ρ y x THE$ in the PO state is a hallmark of the topological spin correlation endowed with the scalar spin chirality22. The p-T phase diagram is almost identical to that of bulk sample except for increase of the critical pressure pc (~17 kbar). The increased pc is probably due to the tensile strain from the Si sample stage, which compensates the effect of applied hydrostatic pressure.

Figure 4b shows T-dependence of ρ2f in a left-handed MnSi thin plate sample under B = 0.4 T at various pressures, measured with j = 7.5 × 108 Am−2. Contour mappings of ρ2f in T-B plane are presented at several pressures in Fig. 4c–f. Here, we determined the helical-to-ferromagnetic and the partial order-to-ferromagnetic phase boundaries from the inflection points of ρ − B curves and magnetic field where $ρ y x THE$ disappeared, respectively. For p < pc ≈ 17 kbar, a large magnitude of eMChE signal is detected at the periphery just above Tc, like the case under the ambient pressure, as seen from Fig. 4a–d (see also Fig. 3a, b for ρ2f at p = 0 kbar). For p > pc ≈ 17 kbar, the eMChE signal shows the maximum magnitude at the lowest measurement temperature within the PO phase, not around the boundaries between the PO and ferromagnetic states nor between the PO and paramagnetic states (Fig. 4e, f). This feature suggests that the eMChE under p > pc is induced by the quantum spin fluctuations or dynamics of the PO state, which should possess the chiral nature as well.

Lastly, we comment on the existence of eMChE signals with positive (negative) sign in the left-handed (right-handed) MnSi, which show the opposite sign to those induced by thermal and quantum spin fluctuations as discussed above. The positive ρ2f signals in the left-handed crystal are observed at portions of helical and ferromagnetic phases at ambient pressure (blue region of Fig. 3a) and at low magnetic fields in the PO phase (blue regions of Fig. 4e, f). Magnetic-field scans in the temperature region with positive ρ2f at ambient pressure (T = 10–25 K) indicates that the eMChE signals vary in proportion to magnetization (see Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Note 7). This implies contribution from another mechanism for eMChE related not to the spin fluctuations but to the static magnetization. Observation of such a different sign of ρ2f in the low-field region of the PO phase may also capture some static or frozen-order nature of the PO state.

## Discussion

In conclusion, thermal and quantum spin fluctuations in the chiral magnet MnSi, which are critically enhanced in association with classical and quantum phase transitions, give rise to asymmetric electron scatterings, leading to the large eMChE. Our finding sheds light not only on the cooperative phenomenon from spin fluctuations and spin chirality but also on the novel functionality in chiral magnets23, such as the directional nonlinear magnetotransport.

## Methods

### Sample preparation

Single crystals of MnSi were synthesized with use of the Czochralski method. Their crystalline chirality was confirmed by using convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) method (see also Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 3). By focused ion beam (FIB) technique (NB-5000, Hitachi), we cut the thin plates out of those single crystals. Sizes of the thin plates are typically 10 μm × 20 μm × 500 nm. The thin plates were mounted on a silicon stage and were fixed with the use of FIB-assisted tungsten-deposition. Gold electrodes were patterned by using photolithography and electron beam deposition. We prepared several thin-plate samples to confirm the reproducibility.

### Transport measurements

Linear longitudinal resistivity and Hall resistivity were measured by using dc-transport option of Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS). Hydrostatic pressures were applied with use of a CuBe clamp cell, and the applied pressures were calibrated with pressure change of superconducting transition temperature of Pb. Second harmonic resistivity was measured by using a Lock-in technique (SR-830, Stanford Research Systems); we input low-frequency (f) ac current and measured second harmonic resistivity.

### Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Moriya, T. & Ueda, K. Spin fluctuations and high temperature superconductivity. Adv. Phys. 49, 555–606 (2000).

2. 2.

Löhneysen, H. et al. Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1015 (2007).

3. 3.

Taguchi, Y. et al. Spin chirality, berry phase, and anomalous Hall Effect in a Frustrated Ferromagnet. Science 291, 2573–2576 (2001).

4. 4.

Neubauer, A. et al. Topological Hall effect in the A phase of MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 186602 (2009).

5. 5.

Rikken, G. L. J. A., Fölling, J. & Wyder, P. Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236602 (2001).

6. 6.

Krstić, V. et al. Magneto-chiral anisotropy in charge transport through single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Chem. Phys. 177, 11315–11319 (2002).

7. 7.

Pop, F. et al. Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in a bulk chiral molecular conductor. Nat. Commun. 5, 3757 (2014).

8. 8.

Avci, C. O. et al. Unidirectional spin Hall magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/normal metal bilayers. Nat. Phys. 11, 570–575 (2015).

9. 9.

Kim, K. J. et al. Current-induced asymmetric magnetoresistance due to energy transfer via quantum spin-flip process. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1603.08746 (2016).

10. 10.

Yasuda, K. et al. Large unidirectional magnetoresistance in a magnetic topological insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 127202 (2016).

11. 11.

Ideue, T. et al. Bulk rectification effect in a polar semiconductor. Nat. Phys. 13, 578–583 (2017).

12. 12.

Ishikawa, Y. et al. Helical spin structure in manganese silicide MnSi. Solid State Commun. 19, 525 (1976).

13. 13.

Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

14. 14.

Shirane, G. et al. Spiral magnetic correlation in cubic MnSi. Phys. Rev. B 28, 6251 (1983).

15. 15.

Grigoriev, S. V. et al. Critical fluctuations in MnSi near T C: A polarized neutron scattering study. Phys. Rev. B 72, 134420 (2005).

16. 16.

Pappas, C. et al. Chiral paramagnetic skyrmion-like phase in MnSi. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 197202 (2009).

17. 17.

Grigoriev, S. V. et al. Crossover behaviour of critical helix fluctuations in MnSi. Phys. Rev. B 81, 144413 (2010).

18. 18.

Kawamura, H. Universality of phase transitions of frustrated antiferromagnets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 10, 4707–4754 (1998).

19. 19.

Yokouchi, T. et al. Formation of in-plane skyrmions in epitaxial MnSi thin films as revealed by planar Hall effect. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 104708 (2015).

20. 20.

Pfleiderer, C. et al. Partial order in the non-Fermi-liquid phase of MnS. Nature 427, 227–231 (2004).

21. 21.

Uemura, Y. J. et al. Phase separation and suppression of critical dynamics at quantum phase transitions of MnSi and (Sr1-x Ca x )RuO3. Nature Phys. 3, 29–35 (2007).

22. 22.

Ritz, R. et al. Formation of a topological non-Fermi liquid in MnSi. Nature 497, 231–234 (2013).

23. 23.

Michaeli, K. et al. A new approach towards spintronics–spintronics with no magnets. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29, 103002 (2017).

## Acknowledgements

We appreciate T. Ideue, Y. Okamura, and K. Yasuda for useful discussions. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 24224009, 24226002, and 15H05456) and CREST, JST (Grants Nos. JPMJCR16F1).

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan

• T. Yokouchi
• , N. Kanazawa
•  & Y. Tokura
2. #### RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Wako, 351-0198, Japan

• A. Kikkawa
• , D. Morikawa
• , K. Shibata
• , T. Arima
• , Y. Taguchi
• , F. Kagawa
•  & Y. Tokura

• T. Arima

### Contributions

T.Y. fabricated thin plates samples with assistance from K.S. and conducted transport measurements. A.K. grew single crystal. D.M. carried out the CBED method. T.A., Y.Taguchi, F.K, and Y.Tokura supervised the project. Y.Tokura conceived the project. T.Y., N.K., and Y.Tokura wrote the draft. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to T. Yokouchi or Y. Tokura.