Article | Open

PNLDC1 is essential for piRNA 3′ end trimming and transposon silencing during spermatogenesis in mice

  • Nature Communications 8, Article number: 819 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00854-4
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Piwi-interacting RNAs are small regulatory RNAs with key roles in transposon silencing and regulation of gametogenesis. The production of mature piwi-interacting RNAs requires a critical step of trimming piwi-interacting RNA intermediates to achieve optimally sized piwi-interacting RNAs. The poly(A)-specific ribonuclease family deadenylase PNLDC1 is implicated in piwi-interacting RNA trimming in silkworms. The physiological function of PNLDC1 in mammals remains unknown. Using Pnldc1-deficient mice, here we show that PNLDC1 is required for piwi-interacting RNA biogenesis, transposon silencing, and spermatogenesis. Pnldc1 mutation in mice inhibits piwi-interacting RNA trimming and causes accumulation of untrimmed piwi-interacting RNA intermediates with 3′ end extension, leading to severe reduction of mature piwi-interacting RNAs in the testis. Pnldc1 mutant mice exhibit disrupted LINE1 retrotransposon silencing and defect in spermiogenesis. Together, these results define PNLDC1 as a mammalian piwi-interacting RNA biogenesis factor that protects the germline genome and ensures normal sperm production in mice.

Introduction

Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are a class of germline-expressed small non-coding RNAs essential for germ cell genome integrity, development, and fertility1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Associated with piRNAs, the evolutionarily conserved PIWI family proteins direct piRNA-guided transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing8, 9. Mature piRNAs (24–32 nt in length) are processed from long single-stranded piRNA precursor transcripts through a series of cleavage events by specific endonucleases and exonucleases to generate mature piRNAs, which are bound to PIWI proteins6, 9, 10.

Before the formation of mature piRNAs, cleaved piRNA intermediates (we refer to as pre-piRNAs) bound to PIWI proteins undergo a critical 3′–5′ trimming step to generate optimally sized piRNAs11,12,13,14,15,16. TDRKH/Papi was the first piRNA trimming factor identified in primary piRNA biogenesis, as its depletion results in the accumulation of pre-piRNAs 3–10 nt longer than mature piRNAs15, 16. However, TDRKH/Papi itself does not harbor any nuclease domain, and therefore is unlikely to be the exonucleolytic trimming enzyme “trimmer”13, 15. Two recent reports elegantly demonstrate that two poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) family proteins are the trimmers for piRNA 3′ end maturation12, 13. PARN-1 is required for piRNA 3′ end trimming in Caenorhabditis elegans12. The related protein, poly(A)-specific ribonuclease-like domain containing 1 (PNLDC1), identified as a TDRKH/Papi interacting protein, is the trimmer for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in silkworm13. PNLDC1 deficiency in silkworm leads to piRNA 3′ end extension, impaired target cleavage, and reduced piRNA stability13, and its function in mammals is not known.

Here we demonstrate the physiological function of PNLDC1 in mice. We show that PNLDC1 is required for mammalian piRNA 3′ trimming in vivo and is essential for transposon silencing and spermatogenesis in mice. Pnldc1 mutation causes piRNA 3′ extension and great reduction of mature piRNAs. In addition, by analyzing the accumulated pre-piRNAs in Pnldc1 mutant mice, we report the existence of previously speculated phased piRNA biogenesis in mouse pachytene piRNAs. These findings underscore the importance of the piRNA length maturation in mammalian germline genome defense and development.

Results

Pnldc1 is essential for spermiogenesis

To investigate the physiological function of mammalian PNLDC1 and its potential role in piRNA biogenesis, we generated Pnldc1-deficient mice using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Methods section). We designed two guide RNAs (gRNAs) to target exon1 and exon9 of Pnldc1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1a). We electroporated both gRNAs together with Cas9 protein into C57BL/6J zygotes and derived the first-generation (F0) Pnldc1 mutant (Pnldc1Mut) mice with indels or deletions on both Pnldc1 alleles (Supplementary Fig. 1b–e). Genotyping PCR and reverse transcription PCR confirmed successful targeting of Pnldc1 (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2).

We examined five male Pnldc1Mut mice with distinct mutations on Pnldc1 alleles (we refer to as Mut-1, Mut-2, Mut-3, Mut-4, and Mut-5) and found all are viable and grow normally but exhibit smaller testes, ~70% of wild-type control by weight (Fig. 1a). Histological analysis of Pnldc1Mut testes indicated no obvious changes in germ cell types and cellularity (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. 3a). Pnldc1Mut seminiferous tubules contained spermatogonia, spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongating spermatids, but lacked normal spermatozoa (Fig. 1b). At stage VIII, Pnldc1Mut elongated spermatids showed heavily condensed chromatin, but excess cytoplasm (Fig. 1b, right). Abnormally formed heads of elongated spermatids were frequently observed, sometimes surrounded by excess cytoplasm. This represents a late spermiogenic defect at the elongated spermatid stage in the testis (Fig. 1b). In Pnldc1Mut epididymides, germ cell numbers were drastically reduced and no normal spermatozoa were present; instead, sloughed spermatids and a number of residual cytoplasm were observed (Fig. 1c). This spermiogenic defect is consistent among all Pnldc1Mut animals examined (n = 4) (Supplementary Fig. 3). We also established a stable Pnldc1 mutant mouse line carrying an exon1–exon9 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 1f, g) from a female F0 founder. Male mice homozygous for this allele (we refer to as Pnldc1 KO) showed the same spermiogenic arrest seen in all F0 Pnldc1Mut males (Supplementary Fig. 3b).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Pnldc1 is essential for spermatogenesis. a Testicular atrophy in Pnldc1 Mut mice. Testis sizes and weights of adult wild-type (WT) and Pnldc1 Mut mice are shown. n = 5; significance determined by unpaired Student’s t-test; **p < 0.01. Error bars represent s.e.m. b Spermiogenic arrest in adult Pnldc1 Mut mice. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained testis sections from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-5) mice are shown. AES abnormal elongated spermatids, P pachytene spermatocytes, R round spermatids. Scale bars, 100 μm (left) and 20 μm (right). c Hematoxylin and eosin-stained epididymis sections from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-5) mice are shown. Scale bar, 20 μm. d Meiotic arrest in adult Tdrkh KO mice. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained testis sections from adult WT and Tdrkh KO mice are shown. Z zygotene spermatocytes. Scale bar, 20 μm. e Co-immunostaining of CRISP2 (red) and γH2AX (green) in adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testes. DNA (blue) is stained by DAPI. Spermatogenic stages are noted. Scale bar, 20 μm. f The timeline of mouse spermatogenesis with red crosses representing the arrested spermatogenic stages in Pnldc1 Mut and Tdrkh KO testes

As additional evidence of defective spermatogenesis in Pnldc1Mut males, staining for CRISP2, a marker of cytoplasm of step 15 and 16 elongated spermatids17, showed abnormal residue body formation and delayed cytoplasm removal, confirming the lack of normally staged seminiferous tubules throughout spermatogenesis in Pnldc1Mut testes (Fig. 1e). This spermiogenic defect contrasts with the testicular defect of Tdrkh knockout (Tdrkh KO) mice, which shows complete meiotic arrest at the zygotene spermatocyte stage15 (Fig. 1d, f). The spermatid morphological defect in Pnldc1Mut testes also differs from reported knockouts of other piRNA biogenesis factors with spermiogenic defect, which mostly show germ cell arrest at the round spermatid stage18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Pnldc1 is indispensable for spermiogenesis in mice.

Pnldc1 is required for LINE1 retrotransposon silencing

The piRNA pathway plays pivotal roles in transposon silencing and germline genome protection1, 5, 9, 10, 25. LINE1, the most studied active retrotransposon in the mouse genome, is activated in knockout mice of almost all piRNA biogenesis factors26, 27. We examined the expression of LINE1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in adult Pnldc1Mut testes. In situ hybridization with a probe against LINE1 open reading frame1 (ORF1) mRNA revealed a significantly elevated LINE1 mRNA expression in Pnldc1Mut spermatocytes (Fig. 2a). To examine the LINE1 protein levels, we generated LINE1 ORF1 specific antisera (see Methods section). Western blot analysis confirmed the elevated LINE1 protein level in Pnldc1Mut testes (Supplementary Fig. 4). Consistent with in situ hybridization results, LINE1 ORF1 protein expression dramatically increased in Pnldc1Mut pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 2b). LINE1 ORF1 protein could be first detected in Pnldc1Mut zygotene spermatocytes and peaked at the mid-pachytene stage. LINE1 ORF1 was not detected in Pnldc1Mut spermatogonia, preleptotene/leptotene spermatocytes or round spermatids (Fig. 2c). As a positive control, LINE1 ORF1 was upregulated in Tdrkh−/− testes15; the positive cells were leptotene or zygotene spermatocytes because of the early meiotic arrest (Supplementary Fig. 5). These data indicate that PNLDC1 is essential for transposon repression in mammalian male germ cells.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Retrotransposon LINE1 derepression in Pnldc1 mutant spermatocytes. a In situ hybridization of LINE1 Orf1 mRNA in adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testes. LINE1 Orf1 mRNA was upregulated in spermatocytes in Pnldc1 Mut testes but was undetectable in WT testes. Scale bar, 50 μm. b Immunostaining was performed using LINE1 ORF1 antibody on adult testis sections from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) mice. LINE1 ORF1 was upregulated in spermatocytes in Pnldc1 Mut testes but was undetectable in WT testes. Scale bar, 20 μm. c Immunostaining was performed using LINE1 ORF1 antibody and γH2AX antibody on adult testis sections from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) mice. Different cell types were distinguished according to γH2AX staining and DAPI staining. LINE1 ORF1 was expressed from zygotene spermatocytes to mid-pachytene spermatocytes in Pnldc1 Mut testes. Scale bar, 5 μm

Mislocalization of piRNA pathway factors in Pnldc1 Mut testes

We next examined the expression levels and localization patterns of several piRNA pathway factors in Pnldc1Mut testes. Western blotting showed similar expression levels for TDRKH, MILI, GASZ, and MVH between mutant and control testes. MIWI protein level was decreased in Pnldc1Mut testes (Fig. 3a). Although the expression level of TDRKH was similar to that of wild type (Fig. 3a), its localization was polarized to large perinuclear granules in Pnldc1Mut pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 3b), which may correspond to mitochondrial clusters observed in other piRNA biogenesis factor knockouts22, 28, 29. MILI, MIWI, and GASZ staining also showed the same polarized pattern in Pnldc1Mut testes (Fig. 3b). We confirmed that the large granules consisted of clustered mitochondria by staining with a mitochondrial marker AIF (Fig. 3c). MVH, which is also essential for piRNA biogenesis but has a wider distribution throughout the cytoplasm, showed a normal distribution in Pnldc1Muttestes (Fig. 3b). Because piRNA biogenesis factors are normally localized to the intermitochondrial cement of pachytene spermatocytes where piRNA biogenesis is believed to occur, the polarization of TDRKH, MILI, GASZ, and MIWI in a mitochondria congregation zone in Pnldc1Mut testes suggests PNLDC1 deficiency may disrupt piRNA biogenesis.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Pnldc1 mutation causes mitochondria disorder. a Expression of TDRKH, MILI, MIWI, GASZ, and MVH in WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testes revealed by western blotting. β-actin is a loading control. b Aggregation of TDRKH, MILI, MIWI, and GASZ in Pnldc1 Mut spermatocytes. Immunostaining was performed using indicated antibodies on adult testis sections from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) mice. DNA (blue) is stained with DAPI. Protein aggregations are indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Conglomeration of mitochondria in Pnldc1 Mut testes. Immunostaining of WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testis sections with an antibody against AIF, a mitochondrial marker. DNA (blue) is stained with DAPI. Conglomeration of mitochondria is indicated by arrows. Scale bar, 10 μm

Pachytene piRNA biogenesis is impaired in Pnldc1 Mut testes

To explore a role of PNLDC1 in piRNA biogenesis, we examined the size and abundance of small RNA populations from adult wild-type and Pnldc1Mut testes. Radiolabeling of total RNA showed a normal wild-type piRNA population at around 30 nt in length (Fig. 4a). Strikingly, this population was absent in Pnldc1Mut testes; instead, an abnormally longer small RNA population of 30–40 nt in length was observed (Fig. 4a). The absence of normal piRNA population and the presence of longer small RNA population are consistent among all Pnldc1Mut animals examined (Supplementary Fig. 6). To test whether this population of longer small RNAs is piRNAs associated with PIWI proteins, we immunoprecipitated MILI and MIWI, and labeled the associated RNAs. Small RNAs with extended length were observed in Pnldc1Mut MILI and MIWI immunoprecipitates, indicating that these small RNAs are most likely aberrantly processed piRNA intermediates (pre-piRNAs) (Fig. 4b, c). Next, we sequenced small RNA libraries constructed from total RNA, MILI-bound RNAs, or MIWI-bound RNAs from adult wild-type and Pnldc1Mut testes. Sequencing results revealed that the amount of total piRNAs was dramatically decreased in Pnldc1Mut testes as normalized by the microRNA reads (Fig. 4d). In addition, the small RNA population in Pnldc1Mut testes showed extended lengths of 24–44 nt, as compared to 24–32 nt in the wild type (Fig. 4d). The peak of MILI-bound piRNAs (MILI-piRNAs) likewise shifted from 27 nt in the wild type to 32 nt in Pnldc1Mut samples (Fig. 4e), and the peak of MIWI-bound piRNAs (MIWI-piRNAs) shifted from 30 to 34 nt (Fig. 4f). These data indicate that PNLDC1 is required for production of normal mature piRNAs and may facilitate the proper processing of pre-piRNAs.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Increased piRNA sizes and reduced normal piRNAs in adult Pnldc1 Mut testes. a piRNA extension in Pnldc1 Mut mice. Total RNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1 and Mut-2) testes were end-labeled with [32P]-ATP, and detected by 15% TBE urea gel and autoradiography. Square bracket indicates extended piRNAs. b MILI-piRNA extension in Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) mice. Small RNAs were isolated from immunoprecipitated MILI RNPs and were end-labeled with [32P]-ATP, and detected by 15% TBE urea gel and autoradiography. Western blotting was performed with anti-MILI antibody to show immunoprecipitation efficiency. Square bracket indicates extended piRNAs. M molecular weight marker. c MIWI-piRNA extension and reduction in Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) mice. Small RNAs were isolated from immunoprecipitated MIWI RNPs and were end-labeled with [32P]-ATP, and detected by 15% TBE urea gel and autoradiography. Western blotting was performed with anti-MIWI antibody to show immunoprecipitation efficiency. Square bracket indicates extended piRNAs. M molecular weight marker. d The length distribution of small RNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1 and Mut-2) testicular small RNA libraries. Data were normalized by microRNA reads (21–23 nt). e The length distribution of MILI-piRNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1 and Mut-2) MILI-piRNA libraries. f The length distribution of MIWI-piRNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1 and Mut-2) MIWI-piRNA libraries

PNLDC1 is required for pachytene pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming

To examine the characteristics of extended piRNA species in Pnldc1Mut mice, we mapped 24–48 nt reads from both wild-type and Pnldc1Mut small RNA libraries to the mouse genome. Similar to wild-type piRNAs, the longer piRNAs in Pnldc1Mut mice were primarily mapped to piRNA clusters (~80%) (Fig. 5a). We observed the same results for MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs, indicating that the longer small RNAs in Pnldc1Mut are from the correct genomic source and therefore are true pre-piRNAs (Fig. 5a). We next measured the composition of the first nucleotide of Pnldc1Mut pre-piRNAs. piRNAs from both the 24–32 nt reads and 33–40 nt reads of the Pnldc1Mut library had a strong U bias at the first nucleotide position (Fig. 5b). Examination of MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs from Pnldc1Mut testes revealed the same strong U bias at the first nucleotide (Fig. 5b). These data indicate that the formation of the Pnldc1Mut piRNA 5′ end was normal, suggesting that the extended length of Pnldc1Mut piRNAs likely resulted from defective 3′ end trimming. To test this hypothesis, we extracted the 24–32 nt reads from wild-type total piRNA library and 33–40 nt reads from Pnldc1Mut total piRNA library, and performed 5′ end match analysis26. We obtained 3,827,727 unique wild-type library reads from the 24–32 nt population and 2,104,602 unique Pnldc1Mut library reads from the 33–40 nt population. After measuring the overlap between these two populations, we identified 1,604,365 unique reads of 33–40 nt piRNAs from the Pnldc1Mut library that could perfectly match to at least one 24–32 nt read from the wild-type library. Within these matching pairs, 70% could perfectly match at the 5′ end, leaving an extended 3′ end tail (Fig. 5c). We further mapped Pnldc1Mut pre-piRNAs to the most highly expressed piRNA clusters and compared piRNA 5′ end and 3′ end positions between wild-type and Pnldc1Mut piRNAs. The 5′ end positions had similar start nucleotides between wild-type and Pnldc1Mut, while the 3′ end positions showed an obvious extended variety (Fig. 5d). These results indicate that accumulated Pnldc1Mut pre-piRNAs are the bona fide piRNA precursors with untrimmed 3′ end extensions. Therefore, PNLDC1 is required for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in mice. Consistent with recently demonstrated in vitro 3′–5′ exonuclease activity13, 30, PNLDC1 is likely the trimmer for mammalian adult piRNA 3′ end maturation.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

piRNA 3′ end extension in adult Pnldc1 Mut testes. a Genomic annotation of total piRNA, MILI-piRNAs, and MIWI-piRNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testes. Sequence reads (24–48 nt) from small RNA libraries were aligned to mouse sequence sets in the following order: piRNA clusters, coding RNA, non-coding RNA, repeats, and intronic sequences (see Methods for details). “Other” represents sequence reads that did not mapped to the above five sequence sets. The percentage of mapped reads is shown. b Nucleotide distributions at the first position in total piRNA, MILI-piRNAs, and MIWI-piRNAs from adult WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) testes. The 24–40 nt reads from small RNA libraries were used. c Extended piRNA 3′ ends in Pnldc1 Mut testes. The 33–40 nt reads from Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1 and Mut-2) total piRNA library were mapped to 24–32 nt reads from WT total piRNA library. The number of 33–40 nt Pnldc1 Mut piRNA reads that perfectly match at least one WT piRNA was calculated. The percentage of matching pairs that have identical 5′ ends or identical 3′ ends against all matched pairs are shown. n = 2. Error bars represent s.e.m. d Two examples of 3′ end extension in Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) piRNAs. Alignments between 33–48 nt reads from Pnldc1 Mut total piRNA library and 24–32 nt reads from WT total piRNA library within a selected region from two representative piRNA clusters. The genomic locations of these two piRNA clusters are shown at the bottom

Pachytene piRNA biogenesis is phased in mice

In flies and mouse pre-pachytene stages, Zucchini/MitoPLD-mediated cleavage acts both in the 3′ end formation of upstream piRNA and in the 5′ end formation of downstream piRNA, consecutively generating “phased” piRNAs31, 32. It is unknown whether the production of meiotic pachytene piRNAs, the most abundant piRNA population in mammalian germ cells, is phased due to lack of animal models. The accumulation of pachytene piRNA intermediates in Pnldc1Mut mice allowed us to explore the pachytene piRNA precursor cleavage mechanism prior to the piRNA trimming step. We analyzed untrimmed pachytene pre-piRNAs in Pnldc1Mut mice to detect the existence of phased piRNA biogenesis in adult testes using methods described31, 32. We mapped the 24–48 nt reads from wild-type and Pnldc1Mut small RNA libraries to the most highly expressed pachytene piRNA clusters and analyzed the 5′ end and 3′ end sequences from mapped piRNAs. A strong 5′ end U bias appeared in both wild-type and Pnldc1Mut piRNAs, confirming the normal 5′ end formation in Pnldc1Mut piRNA intermediates (Fig. 6a). As expected, at the 10th nt position, there was no obvious adenine (A) residue bias, indicating that the secondary piRNA biogenesis (ping-pong) pathway was not aberrantly activated in Pnldc1Mut mice. Analysis of the piRNA 3′ end downstream sequences mapped to piRNA clusters revealed that U residues are enriched at the first position immediately downstream of Pnldc1Mut piRNA 3′ end (+1 position) (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Fig. 7). This specifies a signature of phased piRNA processing. The 3′ end +1 U signature is likely generated by MitoPLD cleavage, which is known to produce phased pre-pachytene piRNAs by generating simultaneously the 3′ end of current piRNA and the 5′ end of immediate next piRNA. We also observed this +1 position U enrichment in Pnldc1Mut MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs (Fig. 6b; Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). To confirm the phased pachytene piRNA biogenesis in adult testes, we performed 3′–5′ coupling analysis as described31, 32. We mapped piRNA reads to the 10 most highly expressed piRNA clusters and extracted the top 1000 most abundant distinct piRNAs of each cluster as references. We then measured the distance from the 3′ end of each reference piRNA (position 0) to the 5′ end of all the mapped downstream piRNAs within the window of −10 to +50 nt surrounding reference piRNA 3′ end. In wild-type mice, piRNA 5′ ends distribute randomly around the upstream piRNA 3′ ends (Fig. 6c). In contrast, when we analyzed the untrimmed Pnldc1Mut pre-piRNAs, the neighboring piRNA 5′ ends were enriched at positions immediately downstream of the piRNA 3′ ends (+1), indicating that a single cleavage event produces the 3′ end of one piRNA and the 5′ end of the next downstream piRNA (Fig. 6c; Supplementary Fig. 10). Together, these data demonstrate that phased piRNA biogenesis contributes to mammalian pachytene piRNA production.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Pachytene piRNA biogenesis is phased in mice. a U bias at position +1 downstream of piRNA 3′ ends in Pnldc1 Mut total piRNA. The 24–48 nt reads from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) total piRNA libraries were mapped to one representative pachytene piRNA cluster (2-qE1-35981.1, the most abundantly expressed). Sequence logos showing nucleotide composition at mapped piRNA 5′ ends, 3′ ends, and downstream regions of 3′ ends were generated. Gray shading marks the piRNA region. b U bias at position +1 downstream of piRNA 3′ end in Pnldc1 Mut MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs. The 24–48 nt reads from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) MILI- and MIWI-piRNA libraries were mapped to one representative pachytene piRNA cluster (2-qE1-35981.1). Sequence logos showing nucleotide composition in the vicinity of mapped piRNA 3′ ends were generated. Gray shading marks the piRNA region. c Untrimmed Pnldc1 Mut piRNAs exhibit coupling of piRNA 3′ ends with subsequent piRNA 5′ ends. The 24–48 nt reads from WT and Pnldc1 Mut (Mut-1) total piRNA libraries were mapped to one representative pachytene piRNA cluster (2-qE1-35981.1). Top 1000 distinctively mapped piRNAs were extracted as references to perform 3′–5′ coupling analysis. The frequency of piRNA 5′ ends around referenced piRNA 3′ ends was calculated. Z-scores at position +1 (Z1) are shown

PNLDC1 is required for pre-pachytene piRNA trimming

To investigate whether PNLDC1 plays a role in pre-pachytene piRNA biogenesis, we analyzed neonatal (P0) control Pnldc1 heterozygous (HET) and Pnldc1 homozygous (KO) mutant mice carrying an exon 1–exon 9 deletion. MILI localization was not altered in Pnldc1 KO testes (Fig. 7a). However, MIWI2 in Pnldc1 KO germ cells was mislocalized partially to cytoplasm as compared to control (Fig. 7b). This contrasts with the MIWI2 localization pattern in Tdrkh KO testes in which vast majority of MIWI2 was mislocalized to cytoplasm (Fig. 7c). The mislocalization of MIWI2 in Pnldc1 KO mice suggests defective piRNA biogenesis and function. We immunoprecipitated MILI from Pnldc1 HET and KO testes and examined piRNA length distribution (Fig. 7d). Pnldc1 KO piRNAs bound to MILI showed an extended length (~33 nt) as compared to control (~27 nt), indicating a piRNA trimming defect. Mapping of extended Pnldc1 KO piRNAs to a representative pre-pachytene piRNA cluster revealed a 3′ end extension indicative of defect in pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming (Fig. 7e). To examine the effect of defective piRNA trimming on LINE1 expression in neonatal Pnldc1 KO germ cells, we performed immunostaining of LINE1. Interestingly, no obviously LINE1 upregulation was observed (n = 4) (Supplementary Fig. 11). This indicates that the piRNA pathway in PNLDC1-deficient neonatal male germ cells is still at least functional for LINE1 silencing despite defective piRNA trimming and partial MIWI2 mislocalization.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

PNLDC1 is required for pre-pachytene piRNA trimming. a Immunostaining of MILI on newborn (P0) testis sections from Pnldc1 HET and Pnldc1 KO mice. Scale bar, 10 μm. b Immunostaining of MIWI2 on testis sections from Pnldc1 HET and Pnldc1 KO mice. MIWI2 is localized in both cytoplasm and nucleus in P0 Pnldc1 KO testes. Scale bar, 10 μm. c Immunostaining of MIWI2 on P0 testis sections from Tdrkh HET and Tdrkh KO mice. MIWI2 exclusively localizes in the cytoplasm of P0 Tdrkh KO germ cells. Scale bar, 10 μm. d The length distribution of MILI-piRNAs from P0 Pnldc1 HET and Pnldc1 KO MILI-piRNA libraries. e piRNA 3′ end extension in P0 Pnldc1 KO mice. Alignment of 31–40 nt reads from P0 Pnldc1 KO MILI-piRNA library and 24–30 nt reads from P0 Pnldc1 HET MILI-piRNA library within a selected region in one representative piRNA cluster. The genomic location of this piRNA cluster is shown at the bottom

Discussion

We reveal here the physiological function of PNLDC1 in mice. PNLDC1 functions as a mammalian piRNA biogenesis factor essential for piRNA maturation, transposon silencing, and spermatogenesis. PNLDC1 is required for the 3′ end trimming of both pre-pachytene and pachytene pre-piRNAs. The analysis of untrimmed pre-piRNAs in adult Pnldc1Mut mice confirms a previously speculated phased piRNA production for mouse pachytene piRNAs, a meiotic piRNA population unique to mammals.

The PARN group exonucleases, including PNLDC1 and PARN, belong to a family of deadenylases that are responsible for the removal of the 3′ poly(A) tails of mRNAs to control mRNA decay30, 33,34,35. Both PNLDC1 and PARN exhibit poly(A) mRNA deadenylase activity in vitro30. Recently, two elegant studies demonstrate a novel function of the 3′–5′ exonuclease activity of PNLDC1 and PARN in piRNA trimming, a function beyond poly(A) mRNA turnover12, 13. Specifically, PNLDC1, but not PARN, functions as a pre-piRNA trimmer in silkworms13, while PARN-1 is responsible for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in C. elegans12. In the mammalian system, both PNLDC1 and PARN are expressed in the testis13, 30 and thus potentially participate in piRNA biogenesis. Consistent with silkworm data, our results indicate that PNLDC1 is responsible for the trimming of vast majority of pachytene pre-piRNAs in mice. This is supported by the evidence that the majority of piRNAs in Pnldc1Mut showed 3′ extensions and substantial reduction of normal sized piRNAs. Even Pnldc1Mut piRNAs within the normal length range (24–33 nt) contained apparently untrimmed pre-piRNAs that showed a downstream U signature at the +1 position (Supplementary Fig. 12). This crucial function in piRNA trimming coincides with the preferential expression of PNLDC1 in the testis13, 30 (Supplementary Fig. 13) and interaction with piRNA trimming factor TDRKH13. Although a role for PARN in mammalian piRNA trimming cannot be excluded, our finding of the requirement of PNLDC1 in both pre-pachytene and pachytene piRNA 3′ end trimming suggests that PNLDC1 is the key PARN family nucleases involved in mammalian piRNA biogenesis. Since PNLDC1 shows in vitro exonuclease activity specific for poly(A) RNA substrates30, we cannot rule out that PNLDC1 may also participate in germ cell poly(A) RNA regulation and mRNA decay in addition to piRNA biogenesis.

Our data demonstrate that Pnldc1 mutation does not phenocopy Tdrkh mutation in mice, although both genes are indispensable for piRNA trimming. Pnldc1Mut mice display a late postmeiotic germ cell defect during spermiogenesis (Fig. 1a–c; Supplementary Fig. 3). This contrasts with Tdrkh KO mice, which exhibit a complete meiotic arrest before the pachytene stage15 (Fig. 1d). The difference in spermatogenic phenotype suggests that PNLDC1 and TDRKH have non-overlapping functions during spermatogenesis. This may result from their differential impact on piRNA biogenesis, which can be observed as early as in fetal/neonatal germ cells during pre-pachytene piRNA biogenesis. In Tdrkh KO neonatal germ cells, MIWI2 is almost completely shuffled from nucleus to cytoplasm, suggesting the lack of piRNA-bound MIWI2 and a failure in piRNA-mediated transcriptional silencing. In contrast, in Pnldc1 KO neonatal germ cells, MIWI2 localization shifted from the nucleus partially to the cytoplasm. The partial retention of MIWI2 in the nucleus suggests that nuclear MIWI2 is still loaded with piRNAs and could still be functional in piRNA-mediated gene silencing. Indeed, we observed differences in LINE1 silencing in neonatal PNLDC1 and TDRKH mutant germ cells (Supplementary Fig. 11). Thus, the difference in MIWI2 mislocalization may in turn impact piRNA-mediated gene silencing, leading to distinct spermatogenic phenotype between PNLDC1 and TDRKH deficiency. TDRKH is proposed as a piRNA trimming cofactor that bridges PIWI–piRNA and the trimmer13. Conceivably, unlike PNLDC1 whose simple function lies in enzymatically trimming piRNA 3′ ends, TDRKH may have additional functions beyond recruiting trimmer and piRNA trimming. By directly interacting with PIWI proteins by its Tudor domain15, 36 and potentially interacting with piRNAs using its KH domains13, TDRKH could modulate PIWI function and pre-piRNA loading. These potential molecular functions of TDRKH could affect the piRNA pathway in a more profound way than simply increasing the accessibility of PNLDC1 for piRNA trimming and therefore could account for the phenotypic differences between Tdrkh and Pnldc1 mutant mice.

In summary, we show that PNLDC1 is essential for mammalian piRNA 3′ end trimming. Defective pre-piRNA trimming results in compromised piRNA production and function, which contributes to transposon upregulation and block in spermatogenesis. We envision that targeting the mammalian piRNA trimming machinery, especially the enzymatic activity of PNLDC1, could serve as a novel method for development of small-molecule inhibitors for animal sterilization and human male contraception.

Methods

Ethics statement

All the animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan State University (AUF 10/16-173-00). All experiments with mice were conducted ethically according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and institutional guidelines.

Generation of Pnldc1 Mut mice

CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing was used to generate Pnldc1 mutant mice. Wild-type NLS-Cas9 protein, synthetic tracrRNA, and crRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) were used. Protospacer and PAM sequences corresponding to crRNAs were 5′-ACTCCTGCAGGAGCTTGTCG-CGG-3′ for Pnldc1 exon1, and 5′-ACAGCTGACTTGGTCACAAG-AGG-3′ for Pnldc1 exon9. Briefly, tracrRNA and crRNA were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min and allowed to cool down in order to form RNA hybrids, which were then incubated with Cas9 protein for 5 min at 37 °C to pre-form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. RNPs were introduced into C57BL/6J mouse zygotes by electroporation as described previously37. Embryos were allowed to recover and implanted into pseudo-pregnant foster females according to standard procedures. Mutant analysis of offspring was performed using PCR, T7 Endonuclease I assay, and sequencing. For genotyping, tail biopsies were lysed with proteinase K to release genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Sequences of primers used for PCR genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Sanger sequencing was employed to detect exon 1–exon 9 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 1). A total of five first-generation (F0) Pnldc1 mutant male mice were identified and used for analyses after reaching adulthood. A stable mutant mouse line harboring an exon 1–exon 9 deletion was established by breeding a female Pnldc1 mutant founder mouse with a wild-type C57BL/6J male. Subsequent intercrossing generated homozygous Pnldc1 mutant mice with exon 1–exon 9 deletions. Neonatal and adult mutant male mice and their respective littermate controls were used for analyses.

Tdrkh mutant (Tdrkhtm1b(KOMP)Wtsi) mice were purchased from Jackson laboratory.

Histology

Mouse testes and epididymides were fixed in 4% PFA or Bouin’s fixative in PBS at 4 °C overnight and embedded in paraffin. About 5 μm sections were cut. For the histological and morphological analysis, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin after dewaxing and rehydration.

LINE1 ORF1 antisera generation

Complimentary DNA corresponding to LINE1 ORF1 222–357 aa (L1Md-A2, GenBank: M13002.1) was cloned into pET-28a (His-tag) vectors. His-tagged recombinant protein was used as an antigen to generate rabbit anti-ORF1 polyclonal antisera (Pacific Immunology).

Immunofluorescence

Testes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4 °C and embedded in paraffin. About 5 μm sections were cut, dewaxed, and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed by microwaving the sections in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After rinsing with PBS, tissue sections were blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) for 30 min. Testis sections were then incubated with anti-MIWI (1:50; 2079, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MILI (1:100; PM044, MBL), anti-TDRKH (1:100; 13528-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-AIF (1:100; 5318, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CRISP2 (1:100; 19066-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-MVH (1:100; ab13840, Abcam), anti-GASZ (1:50; 21550-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-LINE1 ORF1 (1:800), anti-MIWI2 (1:50; ab21869, Abcam), or FITC-conjugated mouse anti-γH2AX (1:500; 16–202A, Millipore) in 5% NGS at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; A21429, Life Technologies) for 1 h and mounted using Vectorshield mounting media with DAPI (H1200, Vector Laboratories) after washing. Fluorescence microscopy was performed using Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Japan).

In situ hybridization

Testes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4 °C, after immersed in 30% sucrose, testes were embedded in O.C.T compound, and 7 μm sections were cut. Sense and antisense DIG-labeled RNA probes were transcribed using DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche) from a linearized plasmid containing a full length of LINE1 ORF1 (nucleotides 1741–2814, GenBank: M13002.1). After denaturing the probes for 10 min in hybridization cocktail solution (Amresco), the probes were added to the sections and incubated overnight at 65 °C. After washing and blocking, sections were incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-DIG Fab fragments (Roche) overnight. The positive signal was visualized by adding BM Purple (Roche).

Western blotting

Mouse testes were collected and homogenized using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Na deoxycholate, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl). Protein lysates were separated by 4–20% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000; 1706515, Bio-Rad) or goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000; 1706516, Bio-Rad) for 1 h before chemiluminescent detection. The primary antibodies used were: anti-MILI (1:2000; PM044, MBL), anti-MIWI (1:1000; 2079, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MVH (1:5000; ab13840, Abcam), anti-GASZ (1:5000; 21550-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-TDRKH (1:4000; 13528-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-LINE1 ORF1 (1:10,000), and HRP-conjugated mouse anti-β-actin (1:10,000; A3854, Sigma). Uncropped versions of all blots are included in Supplementary Fig. 14.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from mouse tissues using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific). For complimentary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, 1 μg of RNA was treated with DNase I (M0303S, NEB) and reverse transcribed with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). RT-PCR was performed using primers shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Immunoprecipitation of piRNAs

Mouse testes were collected and homogenized using lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% NP-40, and 1 mM DTT) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific) and RNase inhibitor (Promega). After sonication, testis lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were pre-cleared using protein-A agarose beads (Roche) for 2 h. Anti-MILI (1:500; PM044, MBL) or anti-MIWI (1:100; ab12337, Abcam) antibodies together with protein-A agarose beads were added to the lysates and incubated for 4 h. The beads were washed in lysis buffer for five times. Immunoprecipitated RNAs were isolated from the beads using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific) for piRNA labeling or small RNA library construction. For protein detection, immunoprecipitated beads were boiled in protein loading buffer for 5 min. Western blotting of MILI or MIWI was performed as described above.

Detection of piRNAs

Total RNA was extracted from mouse testes using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific). Total RNA (1 μg) or immunoprecipitated RNA (MILI or MIWI) was de-phosphorylated with Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (NEB) and end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB) and [γ-32P] ATP. 32P labeled RNA was separated on a 15% Urea-PAGE gel, and signals were detected by exposing the gel on phosphorimager screen followed by scanning on Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare).

Small RNA libraries and bioinformatics

Small RNA libraries from immunoprecipitated RNAs or total RNA were prepared using NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Kit (E7300, NEB) following manufacturer’s instructions. Multiple libraries with different barcodes were pooled and sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (MSU Genomic Core Facility). The list of small RNA libraries is shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Sequenced reads were processed with fastx_clipper (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html) to clip the sequencing adapter read-through. Clipped reads were filtered by length (24–48 nt, unless otherwise indicated) and aligned to the following sets of sequences: (1) 214 piRNA clusters38, (2) coding RNAs (RefSeq coding gene mRNAs), (3) non-coding RNAs (Refseq non-coding gene mRNAs), (4) Repeats (LINE, SINE, LTR, DNA, Low_complexity, Satellite, Simple_repeat), (5) Intron (Genic regions for RefSeq genes). Reads not mapping to the above five sets of sequences were classified as “other”. Alignments were performed with Bowtie (one base mismatch allowed) in indicated order described above. For alignment to each sequence set, only those reads that were not aligned to any of the previous sets were included. Repeats included classes of repeats as defined by RepeatMasker (ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/mm10/database/rmsk.txt.gz).

To further characterize the extension of piRNA species in Pnldc1Mut mice, 33–40 nt reads from Pnldc1Mut total piRNA libraries were mapped to 24–32 nt reads from wild-type total piRNA libraries using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software. The number of unique 33–40 nt Pnldc1Mut piRNA reads that perfectly match with at least one wild-type piRNA was calculated.

For the generation of sequence logos, processed reads from wild-type or Pnldc1Mut small RNA libraries were separately mapped to the 10 most abundantly expressed mouse pachytene piRNA clusters using BWA software. One mismatch was allowed. About 24–48 nt mapped reads were further used and sequence logos were generated using WebLogo 3 (http://weblogo.threeplusone.com/).

3′–5′ coupling analysis of piRNAs

3′–5′ coupling analysis of piRNAs were performed as described31, 32. Briefly, 24–48 nt reads from wild-type or Pnldc1Mut small RNA libraries were separately mapped to the 10 most abundantly expressed mouse pachytene piRNA clusters using BWA software. One mismatch was allowed. The top 1000 distinctively mapped piRNA species from each cluster were extracted and their 3′ ends were used as position references (position 0) for the 3′–5′ coupling analysis. For each 3′ end reference position, the density of downstream piRNA 5′ ends in a window of 60 nt (−10 nt→ +50 nt) was measured. Frequency of piRNA 5′ ends starting in the vicinity of previous piRNA 3′ end was plotted. Z-scores at position +1 (Z1) were calculated using Z1 = (P1−A)/S. P1 is the value at position +1; A and S are the mean and standard deviation of values of positions −10 → 0 and +2 → +50.

Data availability

All sequencing data are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI under the accession number SRP095532. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Aravin, A. A. et al. Double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of genomic tandem repeats and transposable elements in the D. melanogaster germline. Curr. Biol. 11, 1017–1027 (2001).

  2. 2.

    Aravin, A. et al. A novel class of small RNAs bind to MILI protein in mouse testes. Nature 442, 203–207 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Girard, A., Sachidanandam, R., Hannon, G. J. & Carmell, M. A. A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins. Nature 442, 199–202 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Grivna, S. T., Beyret, E., Wang, Z. & Lin, H. A novel class of small RNAs in mouse spermatogenic cells. Genes Dev. 20, 1709–1714 (2006).

  5. 5.

    Malone, C. D. & Hannon, G. J. Small RNAs as guardians of the genome. Cell 136, 656–668 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Iwasaki, Y. W., Siomi, M. C. & Siomi, H. PIWI-interacting RNA: its biogenesis and functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 405–433 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Lau, N. C. et al. Characterization of the piRNA complex from rat testes. Science 313, 363–367 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Juliano, C., Wang, J. & Lin, H. Uniting germline and stem cells: the function of Piwi proteins and the piRNA pathway in diverse organisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 447–469 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Siomi, M. C., Sato, K., Pezic, D. & Aravin, A. A. PIWI-interacting small RNAs: the vanguard of genome defence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 246–258 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Pillai, R. S. & Chuma, S. piRNAs and their involvement in male germline development in mice. Dev. Growth Differ. 54, 78–92 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Kawaoka, S., Izumi, N., Katsuma, S. & Tomari, Y. 3′ end formation of PIWI-interacting RNAs in vitro. Mol. Cell 43, 1015–1022 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Tang, W., Tu, S., Lee, H. C., Weng, Z. & Mello, C. C. The RNase PARN-1 trims piRNA 3′ ends to promote transcriptome surveillance in C. elegans. Cell 164, 974–984 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Izumi, N. et al. Identification and functional analysis of the Pre-piRNA 3′ trimmer in silkworms. Cell 164, 962–973 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Hayashi, R. et al. Genetic and mechanistic diversity of piRNA 3′-end formation. Nature 539, 588–592 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Saxe, J. P., Chen, M., Zhao, H. & Lin, H. Tdrkh is essential for spermatogenesis and participates in primary piRNA biogenesis in the germline. EMBO J. 32, 1869–1885 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Honda, S. et al. Mitochondrial protein BmPAPI modulates the length of mature piRNAs. RNA 19, 1405–1418 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Maeda, T., Nishida, J. & Nakanishi, Y. Expression pattern, subcellular localization and structure--function relationship of rat Tpx-1, a spermatogenic cell adhesion molecule responsible for association with Sertoli cells. Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 715–722 (1999).

  18. 18.

    Deng, W. & Lin, H. miwi, a murine homolog of piwi, encodes a cytoplasmic protein essential for spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 2, 819–830 (2002).

  19. 19.

    Castaneda, J. et al. Reduced pachytene piRNAs and translation underlie spermiogenic arrest in Maelstrom mutant mice. EMBO J. 33, 1999–2019 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Pan, J. et al. RNF17, a component of the mammalian germ cell nuage, is essential for spermiogenesis. Development 132, 4029–4039 (2005).

  21. 21.

    Wasik, K. A. et al. RNF17 blocks promiscuous activity of PIWI proteins in mouse testes. Genes Dev. 29, 1403–1415 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Zheng, K. & Wang, P. J. Blockade of pachytene piRNA biogenesis reveals a novel requirement for maintaining post-meiotic germline genome integrity. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003038 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Di Giacomo, M. et al. Multiple epigenetic mechanisms and the piRNA pathway enforce LINE1 silencing during adult spermatogenesis. Mol. Cell 50, 601–608 (2013).

  24. 24.

    Zhou, L. et al. BTBD18 regulates a subset of piRNA-generating loci through transcription elongation in mice. Dev. Cell 40, 453–466, e455 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Vagin, V. V. et al. A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline. Science 313, 320–324 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Yang, F. & Wang, P. J. Multiple LINEs of retrotransposon silencing mechanisms in the mammalian germline. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 59, 118–125 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Castaneda, J., Genzor, P. & Bortvin, A. piRNAs, transposon silencing, and germline genome integrity. Mutat. Res. 714, 95–104 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Watanabe, T. et al. MITOPLD is a mitochondrial protein essential for nuage formation and piRNA biogenesis in the mouse germline. Dev. Cell 20, 364–375 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Huang, H. et al. piRNA-associated germline nuage formation and spermatogenesis require MitoPLD profusogenic mitochondrial-surface lipid signaling. Dev. Cell 20, 376–387 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Anastasakis, D. et al. Mammalian PNLDC1 is a novel poly(A) specific exonuclease with discrete expression during early development. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 8908–8920 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Han, B. W., Wang, W., Li, C. J., Weng, Z. P. & Zamore, P. D. piRNA-guided transposon cleavage initiates Zucchini-dependent, phased piRNA production. Science 348, 817–821 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Mohn, F., Handler, D. & Brennecke, J. piRNA-guided slicing specifies transcripts for Zucchini-dependent, phased piRNA biogenesis. Science 348, 812–817 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Goldstrohm, A. C. & Wickens, M. Multifunctional deadenylase complexes diversify mRNA control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 337–344 (2008).

  34. 34.

    Yan, Y. B. Deadenylation: enzymes, regulation, and functional implications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 5, 421–443 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Skeparnias, I., Alphanastasakis, D., Shaukat, A. N., Grafanaki, K. & Stathopoulos, C. Expanding the repertoire of deadenylases. RNA Biol., doi:10.1080/15476286.2017.1300222 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Chen, C. et al. Mouse Piwi interactome identifies binding mechanism of Tdrkh Tudor domain to arginine methylated Miwi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20336–20341 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Qin, W. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in mice by zygote electroporation of nuclease. Genetics 200, 423–430 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Li, X. Z. G. et al. An ancient transcription factor initiates the burst of piRNA production during early meiosis in mouse testes. Mol. Cell 50, 67–81 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Latham and X. Cheng for critical reading of the manuscript, G. Smith and J. Ireland for sharing equipment. This study was technically supported by the Research Technology Support Facility and Transgenic and Genome Editing Facility of Michigan State University. U.M. was supported by a grant R24 OD-012221 from the Office of the Director, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, Division of Comparative Medicine Grants, National Institutes of Health (NIH). This study was supported in part by Michigan State University funds and a grant R01HD084494 from the NIH to C.C. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Deqiang Ding, Jiali Liu and Kunzhe Dong contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    • Deqiang Ding
    • , Jiali Liu
    • , Uros Midic
    •  & Chen Chen
  2. State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    • Jiali Liu
  3. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Avian Disease and Oncology Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, 48823, USA

    • Kunzhe Dong
  4. Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    • Rex A. Hess
  5. Transgenic and Genome Editing Facility, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    • Huirong Xie
    •  & Elena Y. Demireva
  6. Reproductive and Developmental Sciences Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    • Chen Chen
  7. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, USA

    • Chen Chen

Authors

  1. Search for Deqiang Ding in:

  2. Search for Jiali Liu in:

  3. Search for Kunzhe Dong in:

  4. Search for Uros Midic in:

  5. Search for Rex A. Hess in:

  6. Search for Huirong Xie in:

  7. Search for Elena Y. Demireva in:

  8. Search for Chen Chen in:

Contributions

D.D. and C.C. designed research. D.D. performed library constructions, deep sequencing, and data analysis. J.L. performed histology and immunostaining. K.D. and U.M. performed bioinformatics analysis. H.X. and E.Y.D. generated Pnldc1 mutant mice. R.A.H. analyzed the histological defects of Pnldc1 mutant mice. D.D. and C.C. wrote the manuscript. C.C. supervised the project.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Chen.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.