Article | Open | Published:

Organocatalytic synthesis of chiral tetrasubstituted allenes from racemic propargylic alcohols

Nature Communicationsvolume 8, Article number: 567 (2017) | Download Citation


Although chiral allene preparation via formal SN2’ nucleophilic substitutions of enantioenriched propargylic derivatives or metal-catalyzed reactions of racemic propargylic derivatives has attracted considerable attention and found applications in many areas of research, direct use of propargylic alcohols instead of propargylic derivatives for catalytic asymmetric allene synthesis is unknown. Here, we show that a highly enantioselective synthesis of tetrasubstituted allenes from racemic propargylic alcohols has been realized by organocatalysis with good efficiency (up to 96% yield and 97% ee). The intermolecular C–C and C–S bond formation was achieved efficiently with simultaneous stereocontrol over the axial chirality. Furthermore, an adjacent quaternary stereocenter could also be constructed. Mechanistically, the reaction may involve efficient stereocontrol on the propargylic cation by its chiral counter anion or 1,8-conjugate addition of para-quinone methides. In sharp contrast to previous central chirality construction, this process employs quinone methides for axial chirality construction.


Axially chiral allenes are well-known subunits widely present in natural products, bioactive molecules, ligands, organocatalysts, and functional materials as well as versatile chiral building blocks in organic synthesis1,2,3,4,5. Their orthogonal cumulative π-systems often lead to complementary and unique reactivity compared with olefins and alkynes. However, the development of efficient methods to access chiral allenes from readily available starting materials has not been able to fulfill the need for their utilization in organic synthesis. Since Maitland and Mills reported the first chiral allene in 19356, substantial endeavors have been made toward the stereoselective synthesis of axially chiral allenes. The well-established approaches mainly rely on either resolution of racemic allenes or chirality transfer from enantioenriched propargylic derivatives (Fig. 1a). In contrast, direct construction of the axial chirality of allenes from achiral or racemic substrates via asymmetric induction by a chiral catalyst remains substantially challenging, though highly attractive.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Strategies for the asymmetric synthesis of allenes and representative axially chiral allenes. a Previous approaches to the enantioselective synthesis of allenes, which are largely limited to the formation of di- or trisubstituted allenes. Compared with other methods, organocatalytic approaches still remain underexplored and are largely limited to allenaoates. b Useful chiral tetrasubstituted allenes and an allene bearing adjacent quaternary stereocenter

Recently, some progress has been made in catalyst-controlled asymmetric synthesis of chiral allenes based on metal catalysis7,8,9,10,11 and organocatalysis12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. However, unfortunately these methods are largely limited to the formation of di- or trisubstituted allenes1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. In particular, organocatalytic approaches have been mainly based on asymmetric protonation or deprotonation (Fig. 1a).

The lack of efficient catalytic strategies20,21,22,23 for the synthesis of tetrasubstituted chiral allenes is by no means an indication that these molecules are less important. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 1b, tetrasubstituted chiral allenes have been known as key units in useful chiral catalysts24, ligands25, important intermediates toward natural products4, 26, and molecular materials3. In fact, the challenges lie in simultaneous construction of a non-hydrogen- involved bond and establishment of the axial chirality, in which the catalyst must be effective in controlling both events8, 16,17,18.


Design plan

The direct transformation of propargylic alcohols or their derivatives to chiral allenes is one of the most straightforward and efficient strategies1,2,3,4,5. Specifically, chirality transfer from enantioenriched propargylic derivatives bearing a suitable leaving group by means of formal SN2′ reaction represents the most studied and reliable approach (Fig. 2a)5. However, the required pre-establishment of the central chirality in the starting material is a major limitation preventing its large scale applications. Racemization is another issue that could occur in many cases. Recently, Ma and co-worker reported a catalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral 2,3-allenoates from racemic propargylic carbonates9. Mechanistically, dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of the crucial allenic metal intermediates plays a key role in achieving both high efficiency and enantioselectivity by catalyst control, thereby representing a pioneering study of this type (Fig. 2b). However, this elegant approach is limited to the synthesis of disubstituted allenoates. Indeed, catalytic asymmetric synthesis of fully substituted allenes from similar racemic propargylic derivatives, in particular propargylic alcohol itself, remains unknown. Inspired by this pioneering study and prompted by our continued interest in allene synthesis14, 15, we envisioned that, in the presence of a chiral Brønsted acid27,28,29, propargylic alcohols may generate a propargylic cation paired with a chiral counter anion (Fig. 2c)30,31,32. Subsequent nucleophilic attack may generate an allene in a stereocontrolled trajectory governed by the chiral anion. If successful, this formidably challenging process would provide an attractive approach for efficient synthesis for fully substituted chiral allenes.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Chiral allene synthesis from propargylic compounds. a Well-established formal SN2′ reactions from enantioenriched propargylic derivatives. b A rare metalyzed-catalyzed example from racemic propargylic derivatives. c Our design of an organocatalytic approach from racemic propargylic alcohols

Diastereo- and enantioselective C‒C bond formation

We began to test our hypothesis using the racemic alcohol 1a as the propargylic cation precursor and 1,3-diketone 2a as the nucleophile. Chiral phosphoric acids and their analogues were employed as potential catalysts in view of their demonstrated versatility in asymmetric induction in chiral anion catalysis27,28,29,30,31,32. In the presence of the highly acidic N-triflylphosphoramide (R)-A1, the reaction proceeded smoothly at room temperature to provide chiral allene 3a in high yield with good enantioselectivity within a few minutes (Table 1, entry 1). When using (R)-A2 as catalyst, however, the reaction could not take place, indicating the acidity of chiral Brønsted acids plays an important role in our system. These results encouraged us to further evaluate different Brønsted acids for the transformation. As shown in Table 1, the electronic properties and the steric environment as well as the chiral backbone of the catalysts have very strong influence on the diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity (Table 1, entries 1−6). Catalyst (R)-A1 provided the best results in terms of conversion and enantioselectivity (80% ee) (Table 1, entry 1). After optimizing other reaction parameters, including solvent (Table 1, entries 7–15), temperature (Table 1, entries 16–17), etc. (more details in Supplementary Tables 13 of the Supplementary Information), we identified that the axially chiral allene 3a could be obtained in 92% isolated yield with 90% ee and 6.1:1 dr (Table 1, entry 17) when the reaction was run at ‒20 °C with catalyst (R)-A1 (5 mol%) and solvent CCl4 (0.05 M). It is noteworthy that the reaction not only furnished the axially chiral allene unit, but also simultaneously established an adjacent all-carbon quaternary stereocenter, which is a significant challenge in asymmetric synthesis33, 34. Notably, quaternary stereocenters are widely found in biologically important allenic natural products (e.g., Grasshopper ketone, Fig. 1b)1.

Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditions with 1,3-diketone 2a as nucleophile

With the optimized conditions, next we examined the scope of this process. As shown in Fig. 3, a variety of racemic propargylic alcohols bearing electron-rich, electron-neutral, and electron-deficient aryl moieties all smoothly participated in the efficient intermolecular C‒C bond formation process. The corresponding tetrasubstituted chiral allenes were all formed in high yield with good diastereoselectivity and good to excellent enantioselectivity (62‒96% yield, up to 21:1 dr, 77‒97% ee). Heterocycles could also be incorporated into the chiral allene products (3c, 3o, p). Cyclic and acyclic 1,3-diketones as well as β-ketoesters were also suitable nucleophiles (3h–j). It is believed that the 4-methoxyphenyl group (R 2 = PMP) assists the generation and stabilization of the important cation intermediate. It also provides sufficient differentiation from the gem-substituent (R 3) in the subsequent enantioselective C‒C bond formation. In addition to PMP, other substituents, such as p-allyloxyphenyl (3d), p-sulfenylphenyl (3e), and p-hydroxyphenyl (3k–p) groups, can also serve the same role. The absolute configuration of product 3n was unambiguously confirmed by X-ray crystallography.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Allene formation with 1,3-dicarbonyl nucleophiles. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol for 3a3j; 0.6 mmol for 3k3p), (R)-A1 (0.01 mmol), CCl4 (4.0 mL), −20 °C (3a3g) or 0 °C (3k3p), 0.5–30 h. *Isolated yield. Determined by 1H NMR analysis. Determined by HPLC with a chiral stationary phase. §Run at room temperature with anhydrous MgSO4 (200 mg) as additive. #Run at −15 °C. Run at 0 °C. PMP p-MeOC6H4

Enantioselective C‒S bond formation

It is worth noting that in the above scope study allenes bearing a phenol unit 3k3p were not only smoothly obtained, but also formed with higher reaction rate and generally better enantiocontrol. The difference in reactivity and enantioselectivity was more pronounced with thioacetic acid as nucleophile (Fig. 4, Eq. 1). We reasoned that the mechanisms might be different for these two types of substrates (with or without free hydroxy groups). In the absence of a free hydroxy group, the key intermediate should be a cation bearing a chiral counter anion (e.g., OX), as initially proposed. In contrast, in the presence of a free hydroxy group, the initially formed cation could induce proton loss to form a neutral para-quinone methide intermediate (QM)35,36,37,38,39, which was indeed isolated and fully characterized when the substrate was treated with the catalyst in the absence of nucleophile (for details, see the Supporting Information). The p-QM can be activated by the chiral Brønsted acid catalyst for subsequent nucleophilic attack. Notably, both cases require remarkable remote stereocontrol and regiocontrol, and the latter situation is indeed an asymmetric 1,8-conjugate addition. It is worth noting that although catalytic asymmetric 1,4- and 1,6-conjugate additions have received tremendous attention, efficient catalytic asymmetric 1,8-addition has remained almost unknown and this field is still in its infancy40,41,42,43. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the focus of previous efforts on asymmetric reactions of quinone methides all centered on the establishment of central chirality35,36,37,38,39, while this reaction establishes axial chirality with quinone methides.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

The rate difference between 1i and 1i’ with thioacetic acid nucleophile and the proposed intermediates. When R≠H, the reaction may proceed via ion pair OX, while when R=H, the para-quinone methide QM activated by hydrogen bonding might be involved

Encouraged by these results, we next focused on the asymmetric synthesis of hetero-substituted allenes. The presence of a heteroatom can not only bring new synthetic and biological values, but also lead to potential useful interactions by coordination or hydrogen-bonding when needed. Therefore, the design of new enantioselective synthetic strategies to access hetero-substituted chiral allenes is highly desirable. To the best of our knowledge, examples of catalytic asymmetric synthesis of tetrasubstituted allenes bearing a hetero-substituent are essentially unknown1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 44.

While the previous standard conditions with catalyst A1 could not lead to good enantioselectivity for the intermolecular C‒S bond formation with thioacid nucleophiles, fortunately, we were able to improve the reaction selectivity after considerable optimization efforts. As shown in Table 2, other additional acid catalysts were evaluated. Among them, the spirocyclic acid B1 provided the best combination of catalytic activity and asymmetric induction (73% yield, 81% ee, entry 4). Further solvent screening indicated that toluene can slightly improve the yield and enantioselectivity. However, the reactivity was shut down in Et2O, presumably due to competing binding of ether with the catalyst (entry 6). Next, we found that the use of 3 Å molecular sieves could further improve the enantioselectivity (entry 8), while in drastic contrast, 4 Å molecular sieves resulted in almost no product formation (entry 9). Finally, evaluation of other parameters, such as concentration and temperature, identified the optimal conditions that gave both excellent enantioselectivity and good yield (entry 11).

Table 2 Optimization of the reaction conditions using thioacetic acid 4a as nucleophile

With the optimized conditions, we next examined the scope of the C‒S bond formation process. As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 5, a wide range of chiral tetrasubstituted allenes bearing a sulfur substituent can be prepared with good efficiency and excellent enantioselectivity. Various substituents, including aryl, alkenyl, alkyl, and hetero substituents, at different positions of the substrates did not affect the good reactivity and stereocontrol (51–96% yield, 88–94% ee). Notably, steric hindrance on the alkyne, where the nucleophile approaches, did not affect the reaction (5u, v)8. Substitution with heterocycles proved suitable (5f, g). Furthermore, the mild conditions can tolerate a range of functional groups, such as ethers (5b, 5w–x), aromatic and aliphatic halides (5c, d, 5r), silanes and silyl-protected alcohols (5k, l, 5q), olefins (5o), alkynes (5p, 5w), nitriles (5 s), etc. Furthermore, this protocol can also be applied to late-stage installation of a chiral allene unit to an estrone-derived complex molecule (5 h), in which high diastereomeric excess was observed as a result of stereocontrol by the chiral catalyst. In addition to thioacetic acid, thiobenzoic acid (BzSH) can also serve as a suitable nucleophile with slight modification of the conditions. For example, with catalyst (R)-A7, the reaction of 1 u with BzSH smoothly afforded the corresponding chiral allene 5z with high efficiency and enantioselectivity (90% ee). It is remarkable that the stereogenecity was efficiently relayed over eight chemical bonds. It is worth noting that the excellent generality of the process also benefits largely from the compatible in situ generation of the unstable p-QMs.

Table 3 Allenes 5a–v formation with thioacetic acid
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Formation of allenes 5wz. Reaction was carried out with 1 (0.3 mmol), 4 (0.6 mmol), catalyst B1 (5 mol%), and 3 Å MS (90 mg) in solvent (6.0 mL, CCl4 for 5w, x and CH2Cl2 for 5y, z) at −5 °C. *Run without 3 Å MS. Run with A7 at −15 °C

Product transformations

To further demonstrate the utility of the chiral allene products from our protocol, we carried out a preparative-scale synthesis of allene 5v and some transformations. To our delight, comparably high efficiency and enantioselectivity (0.6 g, 90% yield, 92% ee) were observed (Fig. 6a, Eq. 2). Moreover, catalyst B1 could be recycled without loss of catalytic activity. These results suggest that our reaction is amenable to large-scale application. Triflation of the free hydroxy group in 5v efficiently provided the corresponding triflate compound, which is poised for further functionalizations, such as cross-coupling45. The thioacetate moiety can also be smoothly converted to a sulfone unit (7, Eq. 3). Thus, another family of useful activated allenes, allenyl sulfones, can be made in their enantioenriched form46. Furthermore, the tetrasubstituted allene products can be transformed to other useful molecules, demonstrating the ability of axial-to-central chirality transfer1,2,3,4,5. For example, iodocyclization of allene 3b in the presence of NIS and MeOH furnished chiral spirocyclic molecule 8 (Eq. 4). In addition, chiral indene derivative 9 can be obtained from allene 5o. Notably, chiral indene/indane is an important subunit in medicinally important molecules (Fig. 6b)47,48,49.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Representative product transformations and mechanistic studies. a Triflation of the free hydroxy group (Eq. 2), transformation of the thioacetate moiety to a sulfone unit (Eq. 3), and NIS-mediated cyclizations of the chiral tetrasubstituted allenes proceed via the axial-to-central chirality transfer (Eqs. 4–5). b Important molecules bearing chiral indene or indane units. c Control experiments and possible mechanism. The reactions suggest that the 1,8-addition to p-QM is rate-determining (Eq. 6) and the conjugate addition step is irreversible (Eq. 7). The product stereochemistry was purely determined by the chiral catalyst, regardless of the absolute configuration of substrate (Eqs. 8–9), which rules out the possible SN2’ pathway (via TS1). d Kinetic study indicated that the reaction is first-order in catalyst, suggesting that one catalyst molecule is involved in the rate-determining transition state

Mechanistic studies

To gain further insight into the reaction mechanism, we carried out some control experiments. Firstly, subjecting the fully characterized pure QM to the standard conditions led to successful formation of chiral allene 5a in essentially the same yield and enantiomeric excess as the standard protocol from 1i (Fig. 6c, Eq. 6). Indeed, in the standard reaction, we could observe rapid consumption of 1i followed by accumulation and slow disappearance of QM. These observations suggest that the 1,8-addition to p-QM is rate-determining. Moreover, when the allene product 5a (either racemic or enantioenriched) was treated with catalyst B1, no change in enantiopurity was observed, indicating that the conjugate addition step is irreversible (Eq. 7). Furthermore, the enantiopure tertiary alcohol substrate 1i was subjected to the standard conditions (Eqs. 8–9). At partial conversion, the recovered substrate 1i remained enantiopure, indicating the first step (dehydration) is irreversible, presumably due to the elimination of water by molecular sieves. Without molecular sieves, essentially the same results were obtained (1i: >99% ee) along with some enone byproducts generated through the classical Meyer−Schuster rearrangement50. Moreover, it was found that the product stereochemistry was purely determined by the chiral catalyst, regardless of the absolute configuration of substrate 1i (Eqs. 8–9). This observation is consistent with the intermediacy of p-QM. It also rules out the possible SN2’ pathway (via TS1), in which DKR might be operative1,2,3,4,5. Finally, kinetic study indicated that the reaction is first-order in catalyst, suggesting that one catalyst molecule is involved in the rate-determining transition state (Fig. 6d). Thus, we proposed a possible transition state (TS2, Fig. 6c), in which the catalyst plays a bifunctional role for activation of both partners and remote stereocontrol (see the Supplementary Note 4 for preliminary DFT calculations).


In summary, we have developed an efficient and unified method for catalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral tetrasubstituted allenes from racemic propargylic alcohols. It is not only an early demonstration of highly enantioselective chiral ion-pair catalysis involving a formal propargylic carbocation as well as catalytic asymmetric 1,8-conjugate addition, but also a new addition to the small family of catalytic syntheses of chiral hetero- and tetrasubstituted allenes. The chiral Brønsted acid catalysts of proper choice not only allow in situ generation of the reactive intermediates, thereby simplifying substrate preparation and expanding functional group compatibility, but also ensure excellent remote stereocontrol. Control experiments provided important insights into the reaction mechanism. The enantioenriched allene products are also precursors to other useful chiral molecules.


General information

Reagents were purchased at the highest commercial quality and used without further purification, unless otherwise stated. Anhydrous dichloromethane, toluene, diethyl ether, and tetrahydrofuran were purified by the Innovative® solvent purification system. 1H, 13C, and 19F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were collected on a Bruker AV 400 MHz NMR spectrometer using residue solvent peaks as an internal standard (1H NMR: CDCl3 at 7.26 ppm, CD2Cl2 at 5.32 ppm, acetone-d 6 at 2.05 ppm; 13C NMR: CDCl3 at 77.0 ppm, CD2Cl2 at 54.0 ppm, acetone-d 6 at 29.8 ppm). Mass spectra were collected on an Agilent GC/MS 5975 C system, a MALDI Micro MX mass spectrometer, or an API QSTAR XL System. Infrared spectra were recorded on Bruker TENSOR 27 spectrometer and reported in terms of frequency of absorption (cm−1). Optical rotations were measured on JASCO P-2000 polarimeter with [α]D values reported in degrees; concentration (c) is in 10 mg/mL. The enantiomeric excess values were determined by chiral high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using an Agilent 1200 LC instrument. Flash column chromatography was performed on silica gel. NMR and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) spectra are supplied for all compounds: see Supplementary Figs 1218. See Supplementary Method and Notes 12 for the characterization data of compounds 19.

All the racemic products were prepared using the same substrates with the racemic phosphoric acid derived from BINOL as catalyst.

General procedure for the synthesis of axially chiral allenes 3

At room temperature, an oven-dried 10-mL vial was charged with a mixture of the alcohol substrate 1 (0.2 mmol), the carbon nucleophile 2 (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv), and CCl4 (3.8 mL). The reaction mixture was cooled to ‒20 °C (for 3a–j) or 0 °C (for 3k–p) unless otherwise specified, and a solution of the catalyst (R)-A1 (10 μmol, 5 mol%) in CCl4 (0.2 mL) was added in one portion. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature. The progress was monitored by thin layer chromatography. Upon completion, the crude mixture was directly subjected to silica gel flash chromatography (5–10% EtOAc in hexanes) to afford the pure product 3.

General procedure for the synthesis of axially chiral allenes 5

At room temperature, an oven-dried 10-mL vial was charged with a mixture of the alcohol substrate 1 (0.3 mmol), 3 Å molecular sieves (90 mg), and the solvent (6.0 mL, toluene for 5a–g and DCM for others, or noted otherwise). The reaction mixture was cooled to −5 °C, and a solution of the catalyst (S)-B1 (0.015 mmol, 5 mol%) in the same solvent (0.2 mL) and thioacetic acid 4a (0.6 mmol, 42.9 uL) were added in one portion. The reaction progress was monitored by thin layer chromatography. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was directly subjected to silica gel column flash chromatography (10% EtOAc and 1% AcOH in hexanes, the column was pretreated with 10% AcOH in hexanes) to afford the desired product 5.

Data availability

The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures reported in this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), under deposition number of CCDC 1498348. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via All other data is available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Krause, N. & Hashmi A. S. K. Modern Allene Chemistry (Wiley, 2004).

  2. 2.

    Ogasawara, M. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of axially chiral allenes. Tetrahedron: asymmetry 20, 259–271 (2009).

  3. 3.

    Rivera-Fuentes, P. & Diederich, F. Allenes in molecular materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 2818–2828 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Yu, S. & Ma, S. Allenes in catalytic asymmetric synthesis and natural product syntheses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 3074–3112 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Ye, J.-T. & Ma, S. Conquering three-carbon axial chirality of allenes. Org. Chem. Front 1, 1210–1224 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Matland, P. & Mills, W. H. Experimental demonstration of allene asymmetry. Nature 135, 994–994 (1935).

  7. 7.

    de Graaf, W., Boersma, J. & van Koten, G. Chiral induction in the sysnthesis of 4,4-dimethyl-1-phenylpenta-1,2-diene (1-Ph-3-t-Bu-allene) catalyzed by chiral phosphine complexes of palladium. J. Organomet. Chem. 378, 115–124 (1989).

  8. 8.

    Hayashi, T., Tokunaga, N. & Inoue, K. Rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric 1,6-addition of aryltitanates to enynones giving axially chiral allenes. Org. Lett. 6, 305–309 (2004).

  9. 9.

    Wang, Y., Zhang, W. & Ma, S. A room-temperature catalytic asymmetric synthesis of allenes with ECNU-Phos. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11517–11520 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Wang, M. et al. Synthesis of highly substituted racemic and enantioenriched allenylsilanes via copper-catalyzed hydrosilylation of (Z)-2-alken-4-ynoates with silylboronate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 14830–14833 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Chu, W.-D. et al. Enantioselective synthesis of trisubstituted allenes via Cu(I)-Catalyzed Coupling of diazoalkanes with terminal alkynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14558–14561 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Oku, M., Arai, S., Katayama, K. & Shioiri, T. Catalytic synthesis of allenes via isomerization of alkynes under phase-transfer catalyzed conditions. Synlett 493–494 (2000).

  13. 13.

    Liu, H., Leow, D., Huang, K.-W. & Tan, C.-H. Enantioselective synthesis of chiral allenoates by guanidine-catalyzed isomerization of 3-alkynoates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 7212–7213 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Zhao, Y., Tam, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Z. & Sun, J. N-Heterocyclic carbene-catalyzed internal redox reaction of alkynals: an efficient synthesis of allenoates. Org. Lett. 14, 1398–1401 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Qian, H., Yu, X., Zhang, J. & Sun, J. Organocatalytic enantioselective synthesis of 2,3-allenoates by intermolecular addition of nitroalkanes to activated enynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 18020–18023 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Hashimoto, T., Sakata, K., Tamakuni, F., Dutton, M. J. & Maruoka, K. Phase-transfer-catalysed asymmetric synthesis of tetrasubstituted allenes. Nat. Chem 5, 240–244 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Mbofana, C. T. & Miller, S. J. Diastereo- and enantioselective addition of anilide-functionalized allenoates to N-acylimines catalyzed by a pyridylalanine- based peptide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 3285–3292 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Tap, A., Blond, A., Wakchaure, V. N. & List, B. Chiral allenes via alkynylogous Mukaiyama Aldol reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 8962–8965 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Jiang, Y., Diagne, A. B., Thomson, R. J. & Schaus, S. E. J. Enantioselective synthesis of allenes by catalytic Traceless Petasis reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1998–2005 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Raghunathan, R., Sibi, M. P. & Sivaguru, J. Nonbiaryl and heterobiaryl atropisomers: molecular templates with promise for atropselective chemical transformations. Chem. Rev. 115, 11239–11300 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Li, G.-Q. et al. Organocatalytic aryl–aryl bond formation: an atroposelective [3,3]-rearrangement approach to BINAM derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7414–7147 (2013).

  22. 22.

    Zhang, J.-W. et al. Discovery and enantiocontrol of axially chiral urazoles via organocatalytic tyrosine click reaction. Nat. Commun. 7, 10677–10677 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Li, S., Zhang, J.-W., Li, X.-L., Cheng, D.-J. & Tan, B. Phosphoric acid-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of SPINOL derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 16561–16566 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Pu, X., Qi, X. & Ready, J. M. Allenes in asymmetric catalysis: asymmetric ring opening of meso-epoxides Catalyzed by allene-containing phosphine oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10364–10365 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Cai, F. et al. Chiral allene-containing phosphines in asymmetric catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18066–10869 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Ohmori, M., Yamada, S. & Takayama, H. Stereocontrolled synthesis of steroid side chain; stereoselective syntheses of cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol. Tetrahedron. Lett. 23, 4709–4712 (1982).

  27. 27.

    Akiyama, T., Itoh, J., Yokota, K. & Fuchibe, K. Enantioselective Mannich-type reaction catalyzed by a chiral Brønsted acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 1566–1568 (2004).

  28. 28.

    Uraguchi, D. & Terada, M. Chiral Bronsted acid-catalyzed direct Mannich reactions via electrophilic activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5356–5357 (2004).

  29. 29.

    Parmar, D., Sugiono, E., Raja, S. & Rueping, M. Complete field guide to asymmetric BINOL-phosphate derived Bronsted acid and metal catalysis: history and classification by mode of activation; Bronsted acidity, hydrogen bonding, ion pairing, and metal phosphates. Chem. Rev. 114, 9047–9153 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Phipps, R. J., Hamilton, G. L. & Toste, F. D. The progression of chiral anions from concepts to applications in asymmetric catalysis. Nat. Chem 4, 603–614 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Mahlau, M. & List, B. Asymmetric counteranion-directed catalysis: concept, definition, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 518–533 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Brak, K. & Jacobsen, E. N. Asymmetric ion-pairing catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 534–561 (2013).

  33. 33.

    Douglas, C. J. & Overman, L. E. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of all-carbon quaternary stereocenters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 5363–5367 (2004).

  34. 34.

    Hawner, C. & Alexakis, A. Metal-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate addition reaction: formation of quaternary stereocenters. Chem. Commun. 46, 7295–7306 (2010).

  35. 35.

    Wagner, H.-U. & Gompper R. Quinone Methides in The Chemistry of the Quinonoid Compounds (ed. Patai, S.) Chap. 18, Vol 2, 1145–1178 (Wiley, New York, 1974).

  36. 36.

    Parra, A. & Tortosa, M. para-Quinone methide: a new player in asymmetric catalysis. ChemCatChem 7, 1524–1526 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Caruana, L., Kniep, F., Johansen, T. K., Poulsen, P. H. & Jorgensen, K. A. A new organocatalytic concept for asymmetric α-Alkylation of aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15929–15932 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Chu, W.-D. et al. Asymmetric catalytic 1,6-conjugate addition/ aromatization of para-quinone methides: enantioselective introduction of functionalized diarylmethine stereogenic centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9229–9233 (2015).

  39. 39.

    Wang, Z., Wong, Y. F. & Sun, J. Catalytic asymmetric 1,6-conjugate addition of para-quinone methides: formation of all-Carbon quaternary stereocenters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 13711–13714 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Córdova, A. Catalytic Asymmetric Conjugate Reactions (Wiley, 2010).

  41. 41.

    Lear, M. J. & Hayashi, Y. Remote 1,6-stereocontrol by iminium-mediated organocatalytic events. ChemCatChem 5, 3499–3501 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Uraguchi, D., Yoshioka, K., Ueki, Y. & Ooi, T. Highly region-, diastereo-, and enantioselective 1,6- and 1,8-additions of azlactones to di- and trienyl N-acylpyrroles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19370–19373 (2012).

  43. 43.

    den Hartog, T. et al. On the mechanism of Cu-catalyzed enantioselective extended conjugate additions: a structure-based approach. ACS Catal 5, 560–574 (2015).

  44. 44.

    Ma, S. Electrophilic addition and cyclization reactions of Allenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1679–1688 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Wang, Z. et al. Organocatalytic asymmetric synthesis of 1,1-diarylethanes by transfer hydrogenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 383–389 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Zhou, C., Fu, C. & Ma, S. Highly selective thiiranation of 1,2-allenyl sulfones with Br2 and Na2S2O3: mechanism and asymmetric synthesis of alkylidenethiiranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 4379–4381 (2007).

  47. 47.

    Ohlstein, E. H. et al. SB 209670, a rationally designed potent nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonist. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 8052–8056 (1994).

  48. 48.

    Yang, L. et al. Discovery of 3-piperidinyl-1-cyclopentanecar- boxamide as a novel scaffold for highly potent CC Chemokine receptor 2 antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 50, 2609–2611 (2007).

  49. 49.

    Watanabe, N. et al. Discovery and preclinical characterization of (+)-3-[4-(1-Piperidinoethoxy)phenyl]spiro[indene-1,1′-indane]-5,5′-diol hydrochloride: a promising nonsteroidal estrogen receptor agonist for hot Flush. J. Med. Chem. 46, 3961–3964 (2003).

  50. 50.

    Swaminathan, S. & Narayanan, K. V. Rupe and Meyer-Schuster rearrangements. Chem. Rev. 71, 429–438 (1971).

Download references


Financial support was provided by NSFC (21490570 and 21572192), Hong Kong RGC (16304714, 16304115, 16311616, and C5023-14G), and Shenzhen STIC (JCYJ20160229205441091). We thank Dr Herman Sung for assistance in structure determination. J.S. thanks Mr. Wai Kei Yeung (HKUST) for help.

Author information


  1. Department of Chemistry, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

    • Deyun Qian
    • , LinLin Wu
    • , Zhenyang Lin
    •  & Jianwei Sun
  2. The Hong Kong Branch of Chinese National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST), Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

    • Deyun Qian
    •  & Jianwei Sun
  3. HKUST Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, 518057, China

    • Jianwei Sun


  1. Search for Deyun Qian in:

  2. Search for LinLin Wu in:

  3. Search for Zhenyang Lin in:

  4. Search for Jianwei Sun in:


D.Q. conceived the project, performed the experiments, and wrote the paper. L.W. and Z.Y. performed preliminary DFT calculations showing the role of the catalyst in the relevant bond activation. J.S. conceived and directed the project and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenyang Lin or Jianwei Sun.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.