Observation of hybrid Tamm-plasmon exciton- polaritons with GaAs quantum wells and a MoSe2 monolayer


Strong light matter coupling between excitons and microcavity photons, as described in the framework of cavity quantum electrodynamics, leads to the hybridization of light and matter excitations. The regime of collective strong coupling arises, when various excitations from different host media are strongly coupled to the same optical resonance. This leads to a well-controllable admixture of various matter components in three hybrid polariton modes. Here, we study a cavity device with four embedded GaAs quantum wells hosting excitons that are spectrally matched to the A-valley exciton resonance of a MoSe2 monolayer. The formation of hybrid polariton modes is evidenced in momentum resolved photoluminescence and reflectivity studies. We describe the energy and k-vector distribution of exciton-polaritons along the hybrid modes by a thermodynamic model, which yields a very good agreement with the experiment.


The regime of strong coupling between confined excitons and microcavity photons was first observed in 1992 by Weisbuch et al1. in a semiconductor microcavity with three embedded quantum wells (QWs). From the fundamental point of view, the light–matter hybridization allows to create quasi-particles with precisely tailored properties, such as well-defined masses and interaction constants2. The fundamental hybrid excitations in this device, the so-called exciton polaritons, have become a convenient laboratory for studies of collective quantum effects in semiconductors, including coherent phenomena such as Bose–Einstein condensation3,4,5, topological excitations6, 7 and superfluidity8. Furthermore, Polariton condensates have been recently proposed as a platform for practical quantum emulation9,10,11. While a significant progress in the investigation of polaritonic effects in media with highly stable excitonic excitations such as organic materials12,13,14 or GaN15 has been reported, clearly, by far the most striking effects are observed in GaAs-based structures at cryogenic temperatures so far. One additional particular property, which makes cavity polaritons an appealing system for quantum technologies is their spinor degree of freedom, leading to a variety of unique spin- and magnetic effects observed in linear and nonlinear regimes16,17,18. While spin effects in GaAs QWs are rather fragile due to fast spin relaxation, the exciton pseudospin is much better preserved in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) due to pseudospin-valley locking19. The formation of cavity polaritons based on excitons in TMDC monolayers20,21,22,23 and van der Waals heterostructures21 has been reported just recently. Subsequently, a device which features a hybrid polariton mode with an admixture of organic and monolayer excitons has been reported24. However, in the reported scenario, both host materials feature very strong exciton binding energies and small Bohr-radii, which prevents one from taking the full advantage of the organic–inorganic hybridization mechanism. Furthermore, electro-optical effects and current injection are difficult to implement in this kind of device.

Here, we study a hybrid structure, which hosts both large-radius excitons in GaAs QWs and tightly bound excitons in a MoSe2 monolayer. Such a device represents a first crucial step towards combining the unique physics inherent to two-dimensional materials with the well matured device platform in III–V optoelectronics and polaritonics. We demonstrate that both types of excitations enter the strong coupling regime with the same cavity resonance, which gives rise to hybrid excitations that admix excitons of TMDC monolayers and conventional GaAs QWs. This new kind of quasi-particle is evidenced in temperature-dependent angle-resolved photoluminescence (PL) and reflectivity experiments. Our experimental findings are supported by a theoretical formalism based on the two-coupled oscillator model, and the PL angular dependence is shown to follow the simple thermal distribution of polariton states.


Device fabrication

Figure 1a depicts a graphical illustration of our microcavity device: it consists of an AlAs/AlGaAs distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) (30 pairs), which is characterized spectrally by its stop band ranging from 710 to 790 nm (Fig. 1b), supporting a reflectivity up to 99.9 % between 740 nm (1.675 eV) and 765 nm (1.621 eV) at 10 K. The AlAs/AlGaAs Bragg stack, which has been grown by gas source molecular beam epitaxy, is topped with a 112-nm-thick AlAs layer with four embedded GaAs QWs (details can be found in the Method section of the manuscript). A layer of GaInP caps the AlAs layer, to prevent surface oxidation.

Fig. 1

Base structure. a Schematic illustration of the epitaxially grown base structure with a mechanical exfoliated MoSe2 monolayer on top of the GaInP cap. The Bragg wavelength of the bottom AlAs/AlGaAs DBR and the GaAs/AlAs QWs are designed to be resonant to the MoSe2 A–exciton. b Photoluminescence and reflectivity spectra of the structure without flake. The peak at 749 nm named X corresponds to the excitonic electron—heavy hole transition at the gamma—point of the GaAs QWs (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1), which matches the absorption resonance. The reflectivity spectrum is dominated by a stop band which ranges from 710 to 790 nm with a calculated reflectivity of over 99.9 % from 740 to 765 nm. c White light reflection of the structure with and without the MoSe2 monolayer. d Absorption of the MoSe2—monolayer by norming the on-flake reflection to the off-flake reflection shows a strong absorption at the A-exciton energy, 1.666 eV, and a weak absorption at the trion energy, 1.634 eV

Figure 1b shows the reflectivity and PL spectra of this device: We observe a strong PL peak, which we attribute to the emission from GaAs excitons at 749 nm. The resonance correlates with the characteristic absorption dip in the reflectivity spectrum. In addition, the PL spectrum features a second peak at ~760 nm, which only shows a marginal absorption in the reflectivity. Most likely, this feature corresponds to defect assisted transitions in the QWs with small oscillator strength.

As the next step, a single layer of MoSe2, mechanically exfoliated via commercial adhesive tape from a bulk crystal was transferred onto the top GaInP layer with a polymer stamp. The monolayer was identified by its reflection contrast in our optical microscope before the transfer onto the heterostructure. Figure 1c shows the reflectivity spectrum recorded at the sample spot containing a TMDC monolayer. This reflectivity spectrum convolutes the absorption resonance of the A-valley exciton of MoSe2 with the GaAs QW exciton resonance. By norming it with the reference spectrum recorded on a sample spot next to the monolayer (containing the bare QWs), we can recapture the characteristic MoSe2 reflection spectrum, as shown in Fig. 1d). We note, that the spectrum is strongly dominated by the resonance corresponding to the neutral exciton transition, whereas the trion absorption is only weakly visible at 1.634 eV.

The full-cavity device is completed by capping the monolayer with an 80-nm-thick layer of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and a 60-nm-thick gold layer (Fig. 2a). These layers were carefully designed to support an optical resonance with a field antinode both at the position of the monolayer and at the stack of GaAs QWs, while ensuring the spectral resonance with both modes. A transfer matrix calculation of the reflectivity spectrum of our device with nominal layer thicknesses (see Methods section for details) is shown in Fig. 2b. The corresponding refractive indices of the layer sequence and the resulting optical mode profile are shown in Fig. 2c. The resonance features a theoretically expected Q-factor of 1095, which is limited by the finite reflection of the metal top layer.

Fig. 2

Tamm—quantum well (QW)—monolayer hybrid device. a Schematic illustration of the Tamm-plasmon device with the embedded GaAs QWs and the MoSe2 monolayer. b Reflectivity spectrum calculated by the transfer matrix method, which yields the theoretical Q-factor of 1095. c Layer sequence of the top part of the Tamm structure represented by the corresponding refractive indices (blue profile) and the simulated field distribution of the resonant mode (red) within the Tamm structure showing maxima at the QW and monolayer positions

Optical characterization

We will first discuss the formation of exciton polaritons based on the GaAs QW exciton resonance, recorded on a sample spot a few micrometres next to the TMDC monolayer location. We employ the characteristic energy–momentum dispersion relation of the vertically confined photon field to map out the coupling of GaAs exciton and the cavity mode, which is recorded in the PL and reflectivity experiments in the far-field imaging configuration (see Method section for further details). The sample is studied at various temperatures between 10 and 200 K, and the device is excited by a non-resonant continuous wave laser at the wavelength of 532 nm and the excitation power of 3 mW, measured in front of the microscope objective. In Fig. 3a, we plot the corresponding PL spectrum extracted from our device at various values of the in-plane moment recorded at 10 K. The PL spectrum is widely dominated by the strongly parabolic cavity dispersion with an effective mass of (4.2 ± 0.1)×10−5 m e (m e is the free electron effective mass), yielding highly photonic exciton polaritons with a photonic fraction (Hopfield coefficient |C| 2) of 0.967 at k || = 0. Due of the high photonic fraction at k || = 0 we can use the linewidth of the lower polariton branch to estimate the experimental Q-factor which amounts to 650. As the sample temperature is increased to 150 K (see Fig. 3b), the exciton resonance successively redshifts towards the cavity mode, and the system approaches the full spectral resonance at k || = 0, giving rise to well-pronounced upper and lower polariton modes. To extract the coupling strength of the GaAs-Wannier-Mott excitons, we fit our experimental data by the standard coupled oscillator model describing the normal mode coupling of exciton and photon

$$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{E_{{\rm{ex}}}}} & {V/2} \\ \\ {V/2} & {{E_{{\rm{ph}}}}} \\ \end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\alpha \\ \beta \\ \end{array}} \right] = E\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\alpha \\ \beta \\ \end{array}} \right]$$

where E ph and E ex are photon and exciton energies, respectively, and V the exciton–photon coupling strength. The eigenvectors yield the Hopfield coefficients for the exciton and photon fractions of the polariton states. The result of this modelling is shown in Figs. 3a,b along with the experimental data. Here, the red solid lines depict the polariton resonances, the dashed black line represents the empty cavity mode which was slightly shifted compared to the simulation in Fig. 2b based on nominal structural parameters to account for processing and growth inaccuracies, the dashed green line is the exciton energy as a function of the in plane wave vector k ||. Both fits independently yield a coupling strength of V = 9.0 meV, which is in good agreement with the data from literature discussing similar Tamm-structures with embedded GaAs QWs25.

Fig. 3

GaAs quantum well (QW)—polaritons. a Angle-resolved photoluminescence measurements of the Tamm device without the monolayer at 10 K. The dashed yellow line represents the QW exciton energy, the dashed black line corresponds to the cavity mode and the red line the shows the calculated polariton dispersions for the upper and the lower polaritons. b Corresponding measurement at 150 K, yielding the exciton-polaritons at zero detuning

We will now characterize the coupled MoSe2-GaAs-cavity, by studying the energy-momentum dispersion relation at the spot position corresponding to the TMDC monolayer location. This time the device is excited via a pulsed laser (82 MHz) at the wavelength of 745 nm and the excitation power of 500 µW. Figure 4a shows the PL spectrum taken without substantial spatial filtering, which we record on the monolayer. In this configuration, both regions, with and without monolayer, contribute to the recorded signal. The spectrum clearly features two distinct branches with a similar (yet not identical) curvature. While the high-energy branch has been assigned to the lower polariton mode, which is collected from the periphery of the monolayer, the lower energy branch reflects the influence of the monolayer exciton in the system. This can be directly verified by applying tight spatial filtering, which yields a PL spectrum solely dominated by the low-energy branch (see Fig. 4b). The tight spatial filtering is achieved by placing a pin hole in the real-space image of the PL signal. To approach the zero detuning regime in our coupled hybrid device, we again increase the temperature of the sample, as shown in Fig. 4c (spectra taken without strong spatial filtering) and Fig. 4d (with strong spatial filtering). The redshift of the GaAs excitons, as well as the MoSe2 resonance leads to a decrease of the curvature of the polariton resonances, and we can clearly capture the characteristic polaritonic dispersion relation. To describe the eigenenergies of the newly emerging resonances, we extend our coupled oscillator model to the case of three oscillators:

$$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{{\it{E}}_{{\rm{e}}{{\rm{x}}_1}}}} & 0 & {\frac{{{{\rm{V}}_1}}}{2}} \\ \\ 0 & {{{\it{E}}_{{\rm{e}}{{\rm{x}}_2}}}} & {\frac{{{{{\rm V}}_2}}}{2}} \\ \\ {\frac{{{{{\rm V}}_1}}}{2}} & {\frac{{{{{\rm V}}_2}}}{2}} & {{E_{{\rm{Ph}}}}} \\ \end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\alpha \\ \beta \\ \gamma \\ \end{array}} \right] = E\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\alpha \\ \beta \\ \gamma \\ \end{array}} \right]$$
Fig. 4

Hybrid polariton dispersion relation in a hybrid Tamm structure containing a monolayer of MoSe2. a Angle-resolved photoluminescence measurement at the Tamm device with the monolayer at 4 K. The red line represents the calculated polariton dispersion and the green line shows the hybrid polariton dispersion for a slightly wider cavity (~1 nm corresponding to 3 meV energy shift) at the flake position. b Same dispersion measurement as a but with strong spatial filtering at the flake position. The energy of the QW exciton is represented by the dashed yellow line and the cavity mode at the flake position by the dashed black line. The MoSe2 exciton energy of 1.666 eV is not shown on this chart. c PL dispersion measured at 140 K with the same colour coding as before. d Same measurement as c but with strong spatial filtering at the flake position. The energy of the MoSe2 exciton is shown by the orange dashed line. e Angle-resolved reflectivity measurement with strong spatial filtering at the flake position. f Calculated Hopfield coefficients for the lower hybrid polariton branch

Again, the three Hopfield coefficients quantify the admixture of QW- and monolayer-exciton (|α|2;|β|2) and cavity photon |γ|2. To fit the experimental data, we fix the coupling strength of the GaAs QW excitons with the cavity mode as 9.0 meV (see above), and describe the temperature-dependent cavity modes at k || = 0 with m cav = 4.2×10−5 m e (see above). The temperature-dependent excitonic energies are described by the Varshni formula26, 27 and set as constant parameters for the fit function, which reveals a coupling strength of 20.0 meV for the MoSe2 valley exciton. This coupling strength is in a good agreement with the literature21, 26.

While clear PL spectra can only be observed for the lowest hybrid polariton branch, we can identify the frequencies of the remaining two hybrid branches in the reflectivity spectra. Even though the combination of very tight spatial filtering and the highly asymmetric Tamm-structure yields only weakly pronounced resonances in reflectivity, we still can observe signals of three dominant resonances which coincide with the three hybrid polariton branches, in agreement with the coupled oscillator model (Fig. 4e).

These observations allow us to explain the emerging optical resonances in our device as three hybrid polariton modes in the collective strong coupling regime between the embedded GaAs QWs and the MoSe2 monolayer. At the temperature of 140 K and normal incidence, this branch admixes a fraction of 8.95 % GaAs exciton, 15.5 % TMDC monolayer exciton, and 75.6 % cavity photon at k || = 0 (Fig. 4f). Further information about the admixture of the exciton species for various temperatures are described in Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2.

We will now address the polariton distribution along the dispersion branches, Fig. 4d. We shall describe the energy-dependent polariton distribution function within the thermodynamic approach22. This simple model assumes perfect thermalization of the exciton-polariton gas. The PL from the polariton states E i (k) can be found as

$$I\left( {k,\,E} \right) \sim \mathop {\sum}\limits_i {\frac{{{{\left| {C_{{\rm{ph}}}^{\rm{i}}} \right|}^2}\exp \left( { - \frac{{{E_i}\left( k \right)}}{{{k_{\rm{B}}}T}}} \right)}}{{{{\left( {E - {E_i}\left( k \right)} \right)}^2} + {\it{\Gamma }}_{{\rm{ph}}}^2}}}$$

Here, we assume the Boltzmann distribution of our quasi-particles: N i  ~ exp(−E i /k B T), where N i and E i denote i-state population and energy, respectively, and k B is the Boltzmann constant. We assume that the emission stems from the photonic mode (related to the photon Hopfield coefficient |C i |2 = |γ i |2) only and it is broadened in energy according to the Lorentz distribution.

\(\Gamma _{{\rm{ph}}}^{}\) is the broadening of the photonic mode and the i-index spans over three polariton branches. The calculated dispersion relation is plotted in Fig. 5 for the temperature of 140 K. The qualitative agreement between theory and experiment is excellent, and, equally important, our model also explains the absence of the PL signal from the middle and upper polariton branch, which is due to the insignificant photonic fraction in the middle polariton branch and a weak thermal occupation in the upper branch.

Fig. 5

Simulated hybrid polariton dispersions of the Tamm device. Occupation numbers of th e hybrid polariton states at 140 K are obtained using a thermodynamical approach. The parameters used for the simulation are obtained from fitting the data shown in Fig. 4d with the coupled oscillator model. The colour coding is the same as used before


In conclusion, we have evidenced the formation of hybrid exciton-polaritons in the collective regime of strong coupling between Wannier type of excitons in GaAs QWs, strongly bound valley excitons in a MoSe2 monolayer and cavity photons in a Tamm-plasmon-polariton device. We observe the three characteristic hybrid polariton resonances, and explain their occupation by a thermodynamic model. Our work manifests the first successful observation of this new kind of quasi-particles, and paves the way towards a manifold of applications of hybrid exciton-polaritons. While the monolayer excitons in principle are extremely robust and allow to maintain the spinor degree of freedom in a thus far unprecedented manner, the GaAs Wannier QW excitons are highly sensitive to external magnetic and electric fields, and strongly support lasing and condensation phenomena in the strong coupling regime. We also believe that the long-living exciton reservoir provided by the GaAs excitons will strongly alter the relaxation and scattering dynamics compared to polaritons, which are solely based on monolayer excitons. While direct current injection in monolayers has been demonstrated28, including a vertical p-i-n junction in our device would allow us to operate our hybrid polariton device similarly to a standard III–V light emitting diode or vertical emitting microcavity laser.


Sample design and fabrication

The sample was designed by transfer matrix calculations, where the plasmon-polariton resonance was tuned to match the A-exciton and trion resonance of the MoSe2 monolayer and the exciton resonance of the GaAs QWs. The bottom structure consists of an epitaxially grown DBR with 30 pairs of AlAs/Al0.25Ga0.75As layers (62.5/55 nm thickness, respectively, corresponding to a central stopband wavelength of 750 nm) and a 112-nm-thick AlAs—layer on top with an embedded stack of four 5-nm-thick GaAs QWs with 10-nm-thick AlAs barriers in between. The bottom structure is capped with a 63-nm-thick GaInP layer. The stopband ranges from 710 to 790 nm depending on the in-plane wavevector, and the GaAs—QWs emit at 1.658 eV. The MoSe2 monolayer was mechanically exfoliated onto a polymer gel film (polydimethylsiloxane) and was then transferred onto the structure. Eighty nanometre of PMMA was deposited by spin coating onto the structure. Finally, a 60-nm-thick gold layer was thermally evaporated onto the sample.

Experimental setup

We used an optical setup in which both spatially (near-field) and momentum-space (far-field) resolved spectroscopy and imaging are accessible. The sample temperature could be varied between 4.2 K and room temperature by using a Helium flow cryostat. PL is collected through a 0.65 NA microscope objective for the pure QW—polariton measurements and through a 0.42 NA microscope objective for the hybrid polariton measurements to enable strong spatial filtering, and directed into an imaging spectrometer with up to 1200 groves per mm grating via a set of relay lenses, projecting the proper projection plane onto the monochromator’s entrance slit. The system’s angular resolution is ~ 0.03 µm−1 (~ 0.2°) and its spectral resolution is up to ~ 0.050 meV with a Peltier-cooled Si-charge-coupled device as detector.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


  1. 1.

    Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A. & Arakawa, Y. Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3314–3317 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kavokin, A. V., Baumberg, J. J., Malpuech, G. & Laussy, F. P. Microcavities (Oxford University Press, 2007).

  3. 3.

    Kasprzak, J. et al. Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons. Nature 443, 409–414 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Balili, R., Hartwell, V., Snoke, D., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Bose-Einstein condensation of microcavity polaritons in a trap. Science 316, 1007 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Deng, H., Haug, H. & Yamamoto, Y. Exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1489 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Nardin, G. et al. Selective photoexcitation of confined exciton-polariton vortices. Phys. Rev. B 82, 073303 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lagoudakis, K. G. et al. Observation of half-quantum vortices in an exciton-polariton condensate. Science 326, 974–976 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Amo, A. et al. Superfluidity of polaritons in semiconductor microcavities. Nat. Phys. 5, 805–810 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Winkler, K. et al. A polariton condensate in a photonic crystal potential landscape. New J. Phys. 17, 023001 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kim, N. Y. et al. Dynamical d-wave condensation of exciton-polaritons in a two-dimensional square-lattice potential. Nat. Phys. 7, 681–686 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jacqmin, T. et al. Direct observation of Dirac cones and a flatband in a honeycomb lattice for polaritons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 116402 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dietrich, C. P. et al. An exciton-polariton laser based on biologically produces fluorescent protein. Sci. Adv. 2, 8 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Daskalakis, K. S., Maier, S. A., Murray, R. & Kéna-Cohen, S. Nonlinear interactions in an organic polariton condensate. Nat. Mater. 13, 271–278 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Plumhof, J. D. et al. Room-temperature Bose-Einstein condensation of cavity exciton-polaritons in a polymer. Nat. Mater. 13, 247–252 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Christmann, G. et al. Room temperature polariton lasing in a GaN/AGaN multiple quantum well microcavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 51102 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kavokin, A. V., Malpuech, G. & Glazov, M. Optical spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 136601 (2005).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fischer, J. et al. Anomalies of a nonequilibrium spinor polariton condensate in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 093902 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Larionov, A. V. et al. Polarized nonequilibrium Bose-Einstein condensates of spinor exciton polaritons in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256401 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 699–712 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Liu, X. et al. Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nat. Photonics 9, 30–34 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dufferwiel, S. et al. Exciton-polaritons in van der Waals heterostructures embedded in tunable microcavities. Nat. Commun. 6, 8579 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lundt, N. et al. Room temperature Tamm-plasmon exciton-polaritons with a WSe2 monolayer. Nat. Commun. 6, 13328 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Flatten, L. C. et al. Room-temperature exciton-polaritons with two-dimensional WS2. Sci. Rep. 6, 33134 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Flatten, L. C. et al. Electrically tunable organic-inorganic hybrid polaritons with monoloayer WS2. Nat. Commun. 8, 14097 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gessler, J. et al. Electro optical tuning of Tamm-plasmon exciton-polaritons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 181107 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lundt, N. et al. Monolayered MoSe2: a candidate for room temperature polaritonics. 2D Materials 4, 1 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vurgaftman., I., Meyer, J. R. & Ram-Mohan, L. R. Band parameters for III-V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Withers, F. et al. Light-emitting diodes by band-structure engineering in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 14, 301–306 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has been supported by the State of Bavaria. C.S. acknowledges financial support by the European Research Council (unLiMIt-2D project). A.K. acknowledged the support from the HORIZON 2020 RISE project CoExAn (Grant No. 644076). S.H. and A.K. acknowledge funding by the EPSRC.

Author information




C.S and S.H. initiated the study and guided the work. M.W., N.L. and C.S. designed the Tamm device. M.W. exfoliated, identified and transferred the monolayer. M.W. and V.B: grew the microcavity, M.W. fabricated the Tamm structure. M.W., N.L. and M.K. performed experiments. M.W., N.L. and C.S. analysed and interpreted the experimental data, supported by all co-authors. A.V.K. provided the theory. C.S. and M.W. wrote the manuscript, with input from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

Peer Review File

Reviewer reports and authors' response from the peer review of this Article at Nature Communications

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wurdack, M., Lundt, N., Klaas, M. et al. Observation of hybrid Tamm-plasmon exciton- polaritons with GaAs quantum wells and a MoSe2 monolayer. Nat Commun 8, 259 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00155-w

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.