Article | Open

Imaging dynamic fingerprints of competing E2 and SN2 reactions

  • Nature Communications 8, Article number: 25 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00065-x
  • Download Citation
Published online:


The competition between bimolecular nucleophilic substitution and base-induced elimination is of fundamental importance for the synthesis of pure samples in organic chemistry. Many factors that influence this competition have been identified over the years, but the underlying atomistic dynamics have remained difficult to observe. We present product velocity distributions for a series of reactive collisions of the type X + RY with X and Y denoting the halogen atoms fluorine, chlorine and iodine. By increasing the size of the residue R from methyl to tert-butyl in several steps, we find that the dynamics drastically change from backward to dominant forward scattering of the leaving ion relative to the reactant RY velocity. This characteristic fingerprint is also confirmed by direct dynamics simulations for ethyl as residue and attributed to the dynamics of elimination reactions. This work opens the door to a detailed atomistic understanding of transformation reactions in even larger systems.


Base-induced elimination (E2) and bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (SN2) are probably the two most fundamental exchange reactions in organic chemistry1. Both processes are stereo-specific, occur in a concerted way and always appear in competition with each other. Due to the ubiquity and importance of this competition, immense experimental and theoretical effort has historically been devoted to investigate both the intrinsic reactivity and atomistic dynamics of these reactions2,3,4,5,6. In the past years, new experimental and theoretical developments have provided detailed insight into bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions between monatomic anions and methyl halides (X + CH3Y)7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. While early studies already revealed non-statistical reaction kinetics and dynamics and thereby showed that such systems cannot be described using common statistical models such as Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus (RRKM) or phase space theory15, 16, very recent investigations have theoretically postulated quantum state specificity in SN2 reactions17, 18. Furthermore, new mechanisms beyond the classical collinear attack have been revealed and characterized8, 19. All these advances reflect that the understanding of the underlying mechanistic features of nucleophilic substitution is a complex and ongoing subject of research.

One of the most relevant questions related to the dynamics of SN2 processes is how substitution of the halogenated central carbon atom (α-carbon) affects both the dynamics and reactivity of such systems. The addition of bulky substituents is supposed to hinder the well-known Walden inversion and promote the E2 reaction. Such an elimination process is assumed to occur via an anionic attack on a β-carbon-bonded hydrogen atom in periplanar orientation with respect to the α-carbon-Y bond (see Fig. 1). This H-atom can be placed in an anti- or syn-configuration with respect to the leaving halogen atom, the latter geometry being energetically less favourable20, 21.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic representation bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (SN2) and elimination (E2) mechanisms. For SN2 the back-side attack TS is shown, whereas for E2 both the anti- and the syn-TSs are presented. Systems (1)–(4) represent the studied reactions with stepwise substituted alkyl halides

Studies related to SN2 and E2 processes have analyzed how the characteristics of the attacking and leaving anions, the substituents, and the environment influence the reaction probability between SN2 and E2 reactions22,23,24. By studying complex reactive systems where both substitution and elimination can occur, many challenges arise for experiment and theory: In computations the high complexity introduced by adding substituents to the halogenated hydrocarbon makes atomistic simulations very demanding. To date, most theoretical predictions about the ratio between elimination and substitution have been indirectly inferred from stationary point electronic structure calculations25, 26. In particular, many studies have dealt with the influence of the degree of methyl-substitution on the height of the potential energy barriers for E2 and SN2 reactions as an indirect estimation of the preference for a specific reaction27, 28. However, these calculations cannot account for dynamical effects such as the influence of the impact parameter, the role of reactant reorientation during the collision, the specific atomistic reaction mechanisms, or the energy partitioning16. These aspects very likely exercise a significant influence on the preference for specific pre-reaction complex geometries and affect the dynamics and relative efficiency of both reactions.

Experimentally, single-collision studies have become very useful in order to understand the intrinsic mechanistic behavior of organic reactions in a solvent-free environment29, 30. However, disentangling SN2 and E2 reaction products by conventional mass spectrometry is challenging considering that both reactions yield the same ionic species, as illustrated in Fig. 1. Over the past decades, many investigations have provided indirect mass spectrometric estimations of the branching ratio between SN2 and E2 for a variety of systems: deuterium kinetic isotope effects have been employed as a qualitative measure of the tendency of a specific reaction towards substitution or elimination24, 31. Although these studies provide very useful kinetic information, they lack a direct quantitative determination of the competition between substitution and elimination. Other approaches have shown to be better suited to obtaining branching ratios between SN2 and E2. Brauman and coworkers have measured the reaction rate in systems where the SN2 ion-molecule complex undergoes an internal proton transfer leading to a different ion as the SN2 product32. Gronert and coworkers have made use of nucleophilic dianions that form distinct elimination and substitution products upon reaction2, 23. Although the latter method allows one to obtain direct ratios, the presence of bulky dianions introduces steric effects that very likely influence the dynamics and kinematics of such reactions. In this work, we are able to directly image the transition from SN2 to E2 as a function of methyl-substitution and identify, both experimentally and theoretically, an atomic-level mechanism intrinsic to E2 reactions.


Product ion velocity distributions

Using an ion-molecule reactive scattering apparatus29, 33 that combines crossed beam scattering34 and three-dimensional velocity map imaging (VMI)35 techniques (experimental details are presented in the Methods section) we have obtained energy- and angle differential cross-sections for a series of reactions of types (1)–(4), as indicated in Fig. 1. Three different X–Y combinations (F–Cl, F–I and Cl–I) have been studied in order to rationalize the influence of anion nucleophilicity/basicity and leaving group ability on the dynamics and relative efficiency of the E2 and SN2 pathways. For each of these combinations reactive scattering experiments have been performed on reactions with four increasingly methylated neutral species (CH3Y, C2H5Y, iC3H7Y and tC4H9Y) that represent the transition from primary to tertiary alkyl halides. The corresponding reaction enthalpies are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Substitution and elimination reaction enthalpies (ΔrH°) for all investigated systems, calculated using tabulated formation enthalpies48, 49

Figure 2 presents the angle- and energy differential cross-sections of all tabulated reactions. Briefly, each image represents an accumulated product ion velocity distribution in the centre-of-mass frame. The dashed circles represent the energetic limits for the substitution (red) and elimination (white) reactions, respectively. Fig. 2c presents the centre-of-mass velocity distributions of 35Cl product ions from reactions between F and increasingly substituted alkyl chlorides at a collision energy of 1.9 eV. For F + CH3Cl dominant backward scattering of the Cl product ion is observed with respect to the incoming CH3Cl velocity, while scattering into the forward hemisphere and isotropic scattering barely contribute to the velocity distribution. This backward scattering feature corresponds to the commonly assumed collinear substitution mechanism under Walden inversion and has already been reported in previous studies on this and other similar systems8, 13, 36. Both backward and forward scattering are present in the reaction F + C2H5Cl, whereby backward scattering events appear at velocities considerably lower than in F + CH3Cl, indicative of a higher degree of energy partitioning among the larger number of C2H5Cl rovibrational modes. Ions produced from F + iC3H7Cl and F + tC4H9Cl are predominantly forward scattered and no backward scattering is observed, as can be extracted from the scattering angle distributions on the upper right panel of Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Experimental centre-of-mass product velocity and scattering angle distributions. a Scheme illustrating the directions and velocities of the rectants in the centre of mass frame and defining forward and backward scattering, as well as the scattering angle θ. b Chemical structures of the neutral reactants. c–e Velocity map images for four reactions of type X + RY (R=CH3, C2H5, iC3H7, tC4H9): c: F + RCl; d: F + RI; e: Cl + RI. Each histogram consists of a sum of about 50,000 product ion events. For each nucleophile-leaving group combination, the right panel illustrates the corresponding scattering angle distribution as function of methyl substitution of the neutral reactant, where the error bars depict the wighted statistical errors for each histogram bin. A clear transition from backward to forward scattering dynamics is observed in all three cases. The energetic limits for the SN2 and E2 channels are marked by red and white dashed circles, respectively. The experimental result for F + CH3Cl (upper left image) has been adapted from a recent publication13

Fig. 2d shows product I ion images from reactions between F and stepwise substituted alkyl iodides. As discussed in a previous work, the reaction between F and CH3I features dominant indirect as well as direct stripping dynamics37. The reaction F + C2H5I presents a combination of forward, backward and sideways scattered events, whereas both F + iC3H7I and F + tC4H9I show dominant forward scattering of the I product. There are clear differences between the velocity distributions of F + CH3Cl and F + CH3I, which was recently shown to arise from a substantially different relative orientation of the respective reactants13. In contrast, we observe forward scattering of the leaving Cl or I ion in reactions with tC4H9Y. As such a scattering pattern has never been observed for nucleophilic substitution reactions, we assign this feature to the atomic-level mechanism of base-induced elimination. This is in line with more indirect previous findings that tC4H9Y reactions occur via E2 due to the strong steric hindrance at the α-carbon31.

In order to confirm the inherent character of this mechanism irrespective of the attacking anion, additional experiments between Cl and different alkyl iodides have been performed. The resulting centre-of-mass product velocity distributions are presented in Fig. 2e and again show a clear transition from dominant backward scattering in Cl + CH3I toward a forward scattering mechanism in reactions with tC4H9I, as clearly illustrated in the lower right scattering angle distribution of Fig. 2. For Cl + C2H5I a high fraction of backward scattered events show velocities above the kinematic limit of the E2 reaction, unambiguously indicating nucleophilic substitution events. In contrast to the nucleophile-leaving group combinations discussed before, backward scattered events are still observed both in reactions with C2H5I and iC3H7I. This fact can be explained by the lower proton affinity of Cl and consequently by the smaller tendency of undergoing E2 reactions at increasing CH3-substitution. The observed mechanistic transition as a function of methylation is very similar to the reactions with F ions and reinforces the indication that scattering into the forward hemisphere is a mechanistic fingerprint of E2 reactions.

Reaction mechanisms and atomistic dynamics

To complement the experimental findings, the main atomic-level mechanisms involved in the F + C2H5I reaction were investigated by quasi-classical trajectory direct chemical dynamics simulations38 at a relative collision energy of 1.9 eV (see Simulations section for details on the theoretical method). The resulting potential energy profiles for the different SN2 and E2 pathways are shown in Fig. 3; they have been reported in detail in39. Both SN2 and E2 exhibit strongly bound pre- and post-reaction complexes separated by central transition states (TSs). Three of the TSs are lower in energy than the reactants, while a significant potential energy barrier of 0.49 eV is obtained for the front-side SN2 pathway. However, this barrier is much less than the collision energy of 1.9 eV. The back-side SN2 and anti-E2 TSs are very similar in energy and lie substantially below the syn-E2 TS.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Schematic representation reaction energy profiles for E2 and SN2 pathways in F + CH3CH2I. The calculations have been carried out at the M06/ECP/d level of theory. The optimized TS structures are shown for all four reaction mechanisms. The indicated energies include zero-point energy (ZPE) corrections

Fig. 4a shows the obtained mechanisms and their respective branching ratio from the reactive trajectories. Base-induced elimination is by far the dominant channel, representing over 80% of all reactive trajectories. For the E2 pathway both direct and indirect mechanisms are identified, the former having the largest probability. A high fraction of anti-E2 trajectories proceed via a direct pathway. Representative snapshots of such a trajectory are presented in Fig. 4b. The mechanism proceeds via an anti-periplanar TS geometry followed by simultaneous formation of HF and I. As shown in the cartoon, the anion usually approaches at large impact parameters and abstracts a β-hydrogen without modifying its original direction. Such an atomic-level mechanism is very similar to the stripping dynamics observed in several X + CH3Y reactions12. All E2 reactive trajectories were found to depend on the initial relative orientation of the anion and the β-hydrogen, as no rotation of the CH3 group was observed. This is expected given a CH3 rotational barrier of 0.15 eV, which cannot be surmounted under the internal temperatures of the neutral reactant (see Methods section).

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a Branching ratio of the different mechanisms of SN2 and E2 reactions in F + C2H5I at 1.9 eV. Direct reaction pathways exhibit a dark colour, whereas all indirect mechanisms are marked by lighter colours. b Atomistic dynamics of a typical trajectory for the direct anti-E2 mechanism. The numbers indicated in the upper area of the cartoons correspond to the trajectory time in femtoseconds (10−15 s)

A smaller fraction of trajectories is found to follow indirect elimination dynamics, mainly through the formation of a long-lived ion-dipole complex. Some trajectories follow an alternative pathway and form the alternative post-reaction complexes [HF–C2H4] + I or [CH3CH2I–F]. The roundabout pathway8 also participates in the indirect E2 mechanism. In addition, both dihalide formation and proton transfer reactions were observed after overcoming the syn-E2 and anti-E2 TSs, respectively. The formation of these products has been recently reported to be efficient in F + CH3I40 and is also observed to a minor extent in the current experiments. As also found for a variety of X + CH3Y reactions12, the SN2 pathway occurs via direct rebound, direct stripping and indirect mechanisms. Average direct anti-E2 reactions finish in about 500 fs (see Fig. 5). Nearly equivalent average trajectory times of 500–700 fs are obtained for the direct syn-E2 and SN2 pathways. The time for indirect elimination trajectories lies in the range of 1000–1200 fs.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Reaction probability of the three main reaction mechanisms as a function of impact parameter. The relative collision energy is set to 1.9 eV. The vertical error bars represent the statistical uncertainty in the reaction probability at each impact parameter, computed from the square root of the number of reactive events

In order to elucidate possible differences between the reaction dynamics of SN2, anti-E2 and syn-E2 reactions we analyzed the opacity function of F + CH3CH2I. The results are shown in Fig. 5. Overall, a decrease of the reaction probability with increasing impact parameter b is observed. When considering each of the three main pathways separately, the probability for anti-elimination shows no marked dependence on the impact parameter and remains high even at high values of b. Such high relative reaction probabilities at high impact parameters have been observed for direct stripping trajectories in X + CH3Y reactions, which usually lead to forward and sideways scattering of the product ion10, 37. In contrast to this, the reaction probabilities for the syn-E2 and SN2 pathways drastically decrease at large impact parameters. These findings are in accordance with the geometrical character of the respective TSs, where only the anti-E2 TS shows a relatively extended and relaxed structure, where the anion can easily abstract the β-hydrogen even approaching from large distances.

To further compare with experiments, the product scattering angle distribution for each of the E2 reactive pathways has been analyzed. Table 2 summarizes the relative fraction of product ions scattered into different angle regions for both the anti-E2 and syn-E2 mechanisms. Forward and backward scattering along the centre of mass are represented by θ = 0° and θ = 180°, respectively. Both anti-E2 and syn-E2 trajectories show a marked preference for sideways- and forward scattering over backward pathways. Overall, the theoretical findings agree very well with the experimental product scattering angle and reinforce the assignment of a stripping-like forward scattering mechanism inherent to E2. Regarding the energy partitioning, simulations predict that 40.9 and 33.3% of the initially available energy is transfered into product ion translational motion in direct anti-E2 and syn-E2 reactions, respectively. These fractions are very similar to the experimentally obtained value of 35.1%, which is given by the product ion mean translational energy with respect to the kinematic limit for the E2 channel. As syn-E2 reactions occur at lower impact parameters it is expected that more energy is transfered into internal degrees of freedom if compared with anti-E2 processes. Thus, these results are in line with the impact parameter analysis.

Table 2: Fraction of total reactive trajectories as a function of product ion scattering angle for the different anti-E2 and syn-E2 mechanisms


The differential scattering cross-sections for a series of reactions between monatomic anions and increasingly methyl-substituted alkyl halide molecules have been measured. Strong similarities between the reactions of different anions with tert-butyl halides clearly indicate the presence of a mechanism inherent to E2 reactions that leads to forward scattered products. By monitoring the effect of methylation, direct imaging of the transition from substitution to elimination, characterized by the change from backward scattering to scattering into the forward hemisphere, is observed. Direct chemical dynamics trajectory simulations on F + C2H5I show anti-E2 as the dominant reaction channel. Both the significant reaction probability for this channel at high impact parameters and the clear preference for forward and sideways scattering of the product ion agree with the experimental findings. This combined experimental and theoretical reaction dynamics study provides evidence of the intrinsic mechanisms of bimolecular elimination and introduces a method to monitor the competition between SN2 and E2 reactions and its dependence on steric hindrance. The present results show that the concerted atomistic dynamics of molecular reactions can be unraveled even when a considerable number of atoms are involved. These investigations pave the way for future studies of the dynamics of bond formation and cleavage in other complex polyatomic systems such as aromatic ring formation and for the active control of the branching between different reaction mechanisms by electric fields or optical excitation.



The reactive scattering experiments were carried out using a combination of crossed beams and VMI29, 33. The whole experiment is operated at 20 Hz repetition rate. The reactant ions are produced by dissociative electron attachment of the given precursor in a plasma discharge source. F and Cl are generated from mixtures of 10% NF3 in Argon and 5% CH3Cl in Argon, respectively. The ion species are extracted, mass selected and guided into an octupole radiofrequency ion trap via a Wiley–McLaren type time-of-flight spectrometer41. Here, the kinetic energy spread of the ions is minimized through non-reactive collisions with pulsed N2 buffer gas and spatial confinement of the ion cloud using three spherical shaping electrodes. The extracted ion beam is decelerated and crossed with a supersonic neutral molecular beam at a relative collision angle of 60° in the interaction region of the VMI spectrometer. The molecular beam consists of a low concentration of reactant gas seeded in helium. Some of the ion-molecule collisions are reactive and induce either nucleophilic substitution or elimination. The product ions are extracted normal to the scattering plane by pulsing on the electrodes of the VMI spectrometer. The ion detection scheme combines time- and position monitoring. The spatial component is detected by a combination of two multi-channel plates in chevron configuration attached to a phosphor-screen, whose light origin is recorded by a charge-coupled device camera. In addition, a photomultiplier records the arrival time of this light, therefore achieving a three-dimensional velocity detection. The raw laboratory images are then transformed into velocity maps in the centre-of-mass frame. Due to the cylindrical symmetry of the scattering process around the relative velocity axis, the full velocity and angular information can be displayed in a two-dimensional way. Each image shown in this work contains ~50,000 events.

In order to obtain energy differential cross sections, the relative collision energy is varied by setting the ions’ translational energy. Typical kinetic energy spreads achieved in the experiment are in the range of 130–200 meV (full-width at half-maximum). The concentration and backing pressure of the neutral reactant are optimized in order to avoid possible clustering. The pulsed valve is heated to avoid condensation of the nozzle. The velocity and translational temperature of the neutral molecules are obtained by electron impact ionization of the supersonic beam and imaging of the resulting non-fragmented ions. We obtain translational temperatures of 160–170 K, which are considered an upper limit due to the momentum transfer of the impinging high-energy electrons. The rotational temperature is assumed to lie in the same range, whereas a temperature between 165 and 345 K (temperature of the heated valve) is assumed for the vibrations, which are predicted to cool less efficiently during supersonic expansion.


The potential energy profile of the reaction between F and C2H5I has been characterized using the M06 density functional method using an effective core potential (ECP)/d basis set42. This method has been shown to give the best agreement with the CCSD(T)/pseudo-potential (PP)/t benchmark, as compared to other density functionals39. For the ECP/d, Dunning and Woons aug-cc-pVDZ basis set is used for the H, C and F atoms. For iodine, the Wadt and Hay ECP is used for the core electrons and a 3s,3p basis set for the valence electrons, which is augmented by a d-polarization function with a 0.262 exponent, and s, p and d diffuse functions with exponents of 0.034, 0.039 and 0.0873, respectively. For the PP/t basis set, the Peterson aug-cc-pVTZ basis with a PP is used for iodine and the aug-cc-pVTZ basis for all other atoms.

Chemical dynamics simulations were performed by ab initio direct dynamics at the M06/ECP/d level of theory. For this purpose, the VENUS general chemical dynamics computer program was used43 and interfaced44 to the NWChem electronic structure computer program45. Including zero-point energy (ZPE) corrections, this theory gives reaction exothermicities of −46.5 and −32.4 kcal mol−1 for the SN2 product C2H5F + I and the E2 product CH2=CH2 + HF + I, respectively, in good agreement with the experimental values of −48.7 and −37.6 kcal mol−146. To compare with the experiments, the simulations were performed at a collision energy of 1.9 eV and C2H5I rotational and vibrational temperatures of 165 and 250 K, respectively. Quasi-classical sampling, which includes ZPE, was used to determine initial conditions for the trajectories, as described previously for the Cl + CH3I simulations47. The impact parameter b was randomly selected between 0 Ã… and the maximum impact parameter, bmax, which was determined by incrementing b until no reaction occurred out of 200 trajectories, which happened at bmax = 6.0 Å. A total of 1500 trajectories were calculated in the simulations and their atomic-level mechanisms were determined by animating these trajectories. A representative snapshot is given in Fig. 4b.

Data availability

The experimental data sets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Smith, M. B. & March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure, (Wiley, 2007).

  2. 2.

    DePuy, C. H., Gronert, S., Mullin, A. & Bierbaum, V. M. Gas-phase SN2 and E2 reactions of alkyl halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 8650–8655 (1990).

  3. 3.

    Hu, W.-P. & Truhlar, D. G. Factors affecting competitive ion-molecule reactions: ClO + C2H5Cl and C2D5Cl via E2 and SN2 channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 860–869 (1996).

  4. 4.

    Regan, C. K., Craig, S. L. & Brauman, J. I. Steric effects and solvent effects in ionic reactions. Science 295, 2245–2247 (2002).

  5. 5.

    Gronert, S. Gas phase studies of the competition between substitution and elimination reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 848–857 (2003).

  6. 6.

    Ensing, B. & Klein, M. L. Perspective on the reactions between F and CH3CH2F: the free energy landscape of the E2 and SN2 reaction channels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6755–6759 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Angel, L. A. & Ervin, K. M. Gas-phase SN2 and bromine abstraction reactions of chloride ion with bromomethane: reaction cross sections and energy disposal into products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 1014–1027 (2003).

  8. 8.

    Mikosch, J. et al. Imaging nucleophilic substitution dynamics. Science 319, 183 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Bento, A. P. & Bickelhaupt, F. M. Nucleophilicity and leaving-group ability in frontside and backside SN2 reactions. J. Org. Chem. 73, 7290–7299 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Zhang, J. et al. F + CH3I → FCH3 + I reaction dynamics. nontraditional atomistic mechanisms and formation of a hydrogen-bonded complex. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 2747–2752 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Szabó, I., Császár, A. G. & Czakó, G. Dynamics of the F + CH3Cl → Cl + CH3F SN2 reaction on a chemically accurate potential energy surface. Chem. Sci. 4, 4362 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Xie, J. et al. Identification of atomic-level mechanisms for gas-phase X + CH3Y SN2 reactions by combined experiments and simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2960 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Stei, M. et al. Influence of the leaving group on the dynamics of a gas phase SN2 reaction. Nat. Chem. 8, 151 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Xie, J. & Hase, W. L. Rethinking the SN2 reaction. Science 352, 32–33 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Viggiano, A. A., Morris, R. A., Paschkewitz, J. S. & Paulson, J. F. Kinetics of the gas-phase reactions of chloride anion, Cl with CH3Br and CD3Br: experimental evidence for nonstatistical behavior? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10477–10482 (1992).

  16. 16.

    Sun, L., Song, K. & Hase, W. L. A SN2 reaction that avoids its deep potential energy minimum. Science 296, 875–878 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Wang, Y. et al. Mode specific SN2 reaction dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 3322–3327 (2016).

  18. 18.

    Hennig, C. & Schmatz, S. Reaction cross sections and tthermal rate constant for Cl + CH3Br → ClCH3 + Br from j-dependent quantum scattering calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 19668 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Szabó, I. & Czakó, G. Revealing a double-inversion mechanism for the F + CH3Cl SN2 reaction. Nat. Commun. 6, 5972 (2015).

  20. 20.

    Merrill, G. N., Gronert, S. & Kass, S. R. Systematic study of the potential energy surface for the base-induced elimination reaction of fluoride ion with ethyl fluoride using density functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 208–218 (1997).

  21. 21.

    Bickelhaupt, F. M. Understanding reactivity with Kohn-Sham molecular orbital theory: SN2-E2 mechanistic spectrum and other concepts. J. Comput. Chem. 20, 114–128 (1999).

  22. 22.

    Gronert, S., Fagin, A. E., Okamoto, K., Mogali, S. & Pratt, L. M. Leaving group effects in gas-phase substitutions and eliminations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 12977–12983 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Gronert, S., Fagin, A. E. & Wong, L. Direct measurements of deuterium kinetic isotope effects in anionic, gas-phase substitution and elimination reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 5330–5331 (2007).

  24. 24.

    Villano, S. M., Eyet, N., Lineberger, W. C. & Bierbaum, V. M. Reactions of α-nucleophiles with alkyl chlorides: competition between SN2 and E2 mechanisms and the gas-phase α-effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8227–8233 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Bento, P., Sola, M. & Bickelhaupt, F. M. E2 and SN2 reactions of X + CH3CH2X (X = F, Cl); an ab initio and dft benchmark study. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 4, 929–940 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Wu, X.-P. et al. Exploring the reactivity trends in the E2 and SN2 reactions of X + CH3CH2Cl (X = F, Cl, Br, HO, HS, HSe, NH2, PH2, AsH2, CH3, SiH3, and GeH3). J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 5, 1597–1606 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Conner, K. M. & Gronert, S. Impact of alkyl substituents on the gas-phase competition between substitution and elimination. J. Org. Chem. 78, 8606 (2013).

  28. 28.

    Rablen, P. R., McLarney, B. D., Karlow, B. J. & Schneider, J. E. How alkyl halide structure affects E2 and SN2 reaction barriers: E2 reactions are as sensitive as SN2 reactions. J. Org. Chem. 79, 867–879 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Wester, R. Velocity map imaging of ion-molecule reactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 396–405 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Bierbaum, V. M. Go with the flow: fifty years of innovation and ion chemistry using the flowing afterglow. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 377, 456–466 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Garver, J. M., Eyet, N., Villano, S. M., Zhibo, Y. & Bierbaum, V. M. Mechanistic investigation of SN2 dominated gas phase alkyl iodide reactions. Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. 301, 151 (2011).

  32. 32.

    Wladkowski, B. D. & Brauman, J. I. Substitution versus elimination in gas-phase ionic reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10643–10644 (1992).

  33. 33.

    Trippel, S. et al. Kinematically complete chemical reaction dynamics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 194, 012046 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Casavecchia, P. Chemical reaction dynamics with molecular beams. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 355 (2000).

  35. 35.

    Eppink, A. T. J. B. & Parker, D. H. Velocity map imaging of ions and electrons using electrostatic lenses: application in photoelectron and photofragment ion imaging of molecular oxygen. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 3477 (1997).

  36. 36.

    Carrascosa, E. et al. Nucleophilic substitution with two reactive centres: the CN + CH3I case. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 184309 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Mikosch, J. et al. Indirect dynamics in a highly exoergic substitution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 4250 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Sun, L. & Hase, W. L. BornOppenheimer Direct Dynamics Classical Trajectory Simulations, 79–146 (Wiley, 2003).

  39. 39.

    Yang, L. et al. Competing E2 and SN2 mechanisms for the F + CH3CH2I reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A. 121, 1078–1085 (2017).

  40. 40.

    Carrascosa, E. et al. Imaging proton transfer and dihalide formation pathways in reactions of F + CH3I. J. Phys. Chem. A. 120, 4711–4719 (2016).

  41. 41.

    Wiley, W. C. & McLaren, I. H. Time-of-flight mass spectrometer with improved resolution. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 26, 1150–1157 (1955).

  42. 42.

    Manikandan, P., Zhang, J. & Hase, W. L. Chemical dynamics simulations of X + CH3Y → XCH3 + Y gas-phase SN2 nucleophilic substitution reactions. nonstatistical dynamics and nontraditional reaction mechanisms. J. Phys. Chem. A. 116, 3061–3080 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Hu, X., Hase, W. L. & Pirraglia, T. Vectorization of the general monte carlo classical trajectory program VENUS. J. Comput. Chem. 12, 1014–1024 (1991).

  44. 44.

    Lourderaj, U. et al. The VENUS/NWChem software package. tight coupling between chemical dynamics simulations and electronic structure theory. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1074–1080 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Valiev, M. et al. NWChem: a comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1477 (2010).

  46. 46.

    Ruscic, B. updated Active Thermochemical Tables (ATcT) values based on ver. 1.110 of the Thermochemical Network. Available at: (2012).

  47. 47.

    Zhang, J. et al. Simulation studies of the Cl + CH3I SN2 nucleophilic substitution reaction: comparison with ion imaging experiments. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 114309 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 84th edn, (CRC Press, 2003).

  49. 49.

    NIST NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, 2015)

Download references


This work has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project P25956-N20. E.C. acknowledges support by the DOC-fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Science. J.Z. and L.Y. acknowledge financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos 21573052, 21403047 and 51536002). W.L.H. acknowledges financial support from the Robert A. Welch Foundation under Grant No. D-0005.

Author information


  1. Institut für Ionenphysik und Angewandte Physik, Universität Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25/3, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria

    • Eduardo Carrascosa
    • , Jennifer Meyer
    • , Martin Stei
    • , Tim Michaelsen
    •  & Roland Wester
  2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150001, P. R. China

    • Jiaxu Zhang
    •  & Li Yang
  3. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA

    • William L. Hase


  1. Search for Eduardo Carrascosa in:

  2. Search for Jennifer Meyer in:

  3. Search for Jiaxu Zhang in:

  4. Search for Martin Stei in:

  5. Search for Tim Michaelsen in:

  6. Search for William L. Hase in:

  7. Search for Li Yang in:

  8. Search for Roland Wester in:


E.C. and R.W. designed the experiment. E.C., J.M., M.S. and T.M. performed the experiment. J.Z., L.Y. and W.L.H. performed the theoretical calculations. E.C. analyzed the experimental data. J.Z. analyzed the simulations. E.C., J.M. and R.W. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Wester.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit