Abstract
This retrospective cohort study explored whether the publication of the vasectomy guideline by the American Urological Association in December 2012 increased the percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy. We used commercial health insurance claims between 2010 and 2015 to identify the initial sterilization counseling visit for men aged 18–64 and whether each of them received a vasectomy within six months of that visit. A difference-in-differences analysis isolated the effect of the guideline on the percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy, exploiting suspected variation in guideline exposure and adherence between urologists and non-urologists. In total, 226 012 men had an initial sterilization counseling visit, of which 182 204 (80.6%) were counseled by urologists and 43 808 (19.4%) were counseled by non-urologists. The percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy mildly increased by 1.5% (p = 0.002) after the publication of the guideline. Therefore, the percentage of men who receive a vasectomy may in part be explained by practice guidelines and clinicians’ willingness to consider the procedure, and future research should investigate how clinicians arrive at their decisions to recommend a vasectomy and whether a standardized counseling protocol would ensure consistency.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Merative US LP but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.
Code availability
The code references data which are not publicly available, so it is not publicly available either.
References
Sharlip ID, Belker AM, Honig S, Labrecque M, Marmar JL, Ross SL, et al. Vasectomy: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188:2482–91.
Ostrowski KA, Holt SK, Haynes B, Davies BJ, Fuchs EF, Walsh TJ. Evaluation of vasectomy trends in the United States. Urology. 2018;118:76–9.
AUA Journals. Aims & Scopes for the Journal of Urology® [internet]. American Urological Association [Cited 2023 January 3]. Available from: American Urological Association (auajournals.org).
Barone MA, Hutchinson PL, Johnson CH, Hsia J, Wheeler J. Vasectomy in the United States, 2002. J Urol. 2006;176:232–6.
Shapiro DD, Kamnetz SA, Le BV. Vasectomy practice patterns among family medicine physicians and compliance with the American Urological Association 2012 Vasectomy Guidelines. Urology. 2017;109:115–20.
Posielski NM, Shapiro DD, Wang X, Le BV. Do I need to see a urologist for my vasectomy? A comparison of practice patterns between urologists and family medicine physicians. Asian J Androl. 2019;21:540–3.
Merative. Merative MarketScan Research Databases [internet]. Last revised June 2022. [Cited 2023 November 19]. Available from: https://www.merative.com/content/dam/merative/documents/brief/marketscan-explainer-general.pdf.
World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems [internet]. Last revised 2019 [Cited 2023 November 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases.
Williams VF, Ying S, Stahlman S. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversals, active component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2000–2017. MSMR. 2019;26:11–9.
United States® Census Bureau. Delineation Files [internet]. Last revised October 8, 2021. [Cited 2023 June 9]. Available from: Delineation Files (census.gov).
ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus. Pregnancy at Age 35 Years or Older: ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus No. 11. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140:348’66.
Karaca-Mandic P, Norton EC, Dowd B. Interaction terms in nonlinear models. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:255–74.
Monheit AC, Cantor JC, DeLia D, Belloff D. How have state policies to expand dependent coverage affected the health insurance status of young adults? Health Serv Res. 2011;46:251–67.
Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Estimating the number of vasectomies performed annually in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. J Urol. 2010;184:2068–72.
Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach. JAMA. 2014;312:2401–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.16153
Curtis KM, Jatlaoui TC, Tepper NK, Xapata LB, Horton LG, Jamieson DJ, et al. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65:1–66.
Web of Science™. Citing Results: Citations of Vasectomy: AUA Guideline and 2013 or 2014 or 2015 (Publication Years) [internet]. Clarivate™ [Cited 2023 May 12]. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/cc07c9b8-1a7f-4938-b84d-c7d635fbc180-89919898/date-descending/1.
Huang Z, Hyman MJ, Raheem OA. Trends in the vasectomy rate among privately insured men aged 18 to 64 in the United States between 2014 and 2021. Urology. 2023;179:80–86.
Bole R, Lundy SD, Pei E, Bajic P, Parekh N, Vij SC. Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2023;1-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x
Kassab J, Campbell K, Lindsey J, Torres-Anguiano J, Khera M, Lipshultz L. An Increased Focus on Vasectomy: Overturn of Roe v. Wade Catalyzes Rise in the U.S. Vasectomy Requests. Fertil Steril 2023; Available from An Increased Focus on Vasectomy: Overturn of Roe v. Wade Catalyzes Rise in U.S. Vasectomy Requests (fertstert.org). Accessed Sep 21, 2023.
Zhang TR, Able C, Ramasamy R, Kohn TP. United States vasectomy incidence rises after the reversal of Roe v. Wade in a national clinical and claims database. Fertil Steril. 2023;120:196–7.
Zhang X, Eisenberg ML. Vasectomy utilization in men aged 18–45 declined between 2002 and 2017: Results from the United States National Survey for Family Growth data. Andrology. 2022;10:137–42.
Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;61:159–63.
Punjani N, Goldstein M. Vasectomy: is the apparent decline real or not? Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:69–70.
American Urological Association. The State of the Urology Workforce and Practice in the United States 2015 [internet]. American Urological Association; 2016 April 6 [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/research-and-data/aua-census/census-results.
www.healthcare.gov/coverage/birth-control-benefits/ Healthcare.gov. Birth control benefits [internet]. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from
Oregon Health Authority. Reproductive Health Equity Act [internet]. Oregon Health Authority; [Cited 2022 December 7]. Available from: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HEALTHYPEOPLEFAMILIES/REPRODUCTIVESEXUALHEALTH/Pages/reproductive-health-equity-act.aspx
Khan AI, Patil D, Kawwass JF, Zholudev V, Mehta A. Surgical sterilization among US men and women with employer-based insurance: A claims data analysis. Contraception. 2018;98:247–51.
Acknowledgements
Not every individual who is eligible for a vasectomy may identify as a man. We acknowledge that the term “men” does not reflect every gender identity. Certain data used in this study were supplied by Merative US LP as part of one or more MarketScan Research Databases. Any analysis, interpretation, or conclusion based on these data is solely that of the authors and not Merative. The overturning of Roe v. Wade refers to the issuance of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, NO 19-1392, 597 U. S. _ (2022). This research was internally funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OR and MH proposed the study. MH and ZH designed the study. MH performed the statistical analysis. MH and ZH drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
The University of Chicago Institutional Review Board exempted this study from full review because personal identifiable information was not available in these data.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hyman, M.J., Huang, Z. & Raheem, O.A. The percentage of men counseled by urologists who received a vasectomy mildly increased after the publication of the AUA vasectomy guideline. Int J Impot Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00829-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00829-2
This article is cited by
-
Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Comment on: Vasectomy incidence in the military health system after the reversal of Roe v. Wade
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)