The penile prosthesis has revolutionized the management of erectile dysfunction and is a mainstay in the treatment of this clinical entity. The goal of proper patient selection and counseling is to achieve a satisfactory outcome for the patient. Most patients receiving a penile prosthesis are satisfied with their outcome, and while the penile prosthesis generally allows for high satisfaction rates, avenues for dissatisfaction can arise. Our aim is to aid the prosthetic urologist in identifying such avenues by discussing what factors can lead to a dissatisfied patient. Even a technically successful surgical outcome in the improperly counseled patient can have negative consequences for the patient and the patient-physician relationship. Satisfaction in the penile prosthesis arena can be variably defined and viewed from different perspectives. As such, establishing a personalized framework of expectation management, even in the patient who poses challenging factors, is paramount in preparation for penile prosthesis implantation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
International Journal of Impotence Research Open Access 18 November 2023
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2018.05.004.
Trost L, Wanzek P, Bailey G. A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13:33–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/NRUROL.2015.270.
Henry GD, Donatucci CF, Conners W, Greenfield JM, Carson CC, Wilson SK, et al. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study. J Sex Med. 2012;9:309–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02524.X.
Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prostheses. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:178–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SXMR.2018.10.003.
Fernandez-Crespo RE, Buscaino K, Carrion R. Optimizing outcomes in penile implant surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48:527–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UCL.2021.06.010.
Kohler T, Gupta N, Wilson S. Wilson’s pearls, perils and pitfalls of penile prosthesis surgery. 2nd ed. Fort Smith, AR: Calvert McBride Publishers; 2018.
Swanton A, Munarriz R, Gross M. Updates in penile prosthesis infections. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:28–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/AJA.AJA_84_19.
Akin-Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall J. Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2006;3:743–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2006.00278.X.
Caire AA, Boonjindasup A, Hellstrom WJG. Does a replacement or revision of an inflatable penile prosthesis lead to decreased patient satisfaction? Int J Impot Res. 2011;23:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/IJIR.2011.1.
Trost LW, Baum N, Hellstrom WJG. Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient. J Sex Med. 2013;10:893–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSM.12115.
Ziegelmann M, Köhler TS, Bailey GC, Miest T, Alom M, Trost L. Surgical patient selection and counseling. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:609–19. https://doi.org/10.21037/TAU.2017.07.19.
Gupta AD, Streiff M, Resar J, Schoenberg M. Coronary stent management in elective genitourinary surgery. BJU Int. 2012;110:480–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-410X.2011.10821.X.
Lacy JM, Walker J, Gupta S, Davenport DL, Preston DM. Risk factors for removal or revision of penile prostheses in the veteran population. Urology. 2016;98:189–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2016.06.039.
Penile Prosthesis Information Form. 2020. https://www.smsna.org/images/IPP_Consent.pdf.
Miller LE, Khera M, Bhattacharyya S, Patel M, Nitschelm K, Burnett AL. Long-term survival rates of inflatable penile prostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2022;166:6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2022.03.026.
Hebert KJ, Kohler TS. Penile prosthesis infection: myths and realities. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:276–87. https://doi.org/10.5534/WJMH.180123.
Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G, et al. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol. 2000;37:50–5. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020099.
Osterberg EC, Maganty A, Ramasamy R, Eid JF. Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26:128–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/IJIR.2013.50.
Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1128–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EURURO.2006.10.026.
Krughoff K, Bearelly P, Apoj M, Munarriz NA, Thirumavalavan N, Pan S, et al. Multicenter surgical outcomes of penile prosthesis placement in patients with corporal fibrosis and review of the literature. Int J Impot Res. 2020;34:86–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00373-9.
Sellers T, Dineen M, Salem EA, Wilson SK. Vacuum preparation, optimization of cylinder length and postoperative daily inflation reduces complaints of shortened penile length following implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis. Adv Sex Med. 2013;3:14–8. https://doi.org/10.4236/asm.2013.31003.
Perito PE, Wilson SK. Traditional (retroperitoneal) and abdominal wall (ectopic) reservoir placement. J Sex Med. 2011;8:656–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02202.X.
Mulhall JP, Jahoda A, Aviv N, Valenzuela R, Parker M. The impact of sildenafil citrate on sexual satisfaction profiles in men with a penile prosthesis in situ. BJU Int. 2004;93:97–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1464-410X.2004.04564.X.
Alter GJ. Correction of penoscrotal web. J Sex Med. 2007;4:844–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00512.X.
Fernandez-Crespo RE, Buscaino K, Carrion R. “Pumpology”: the realistic issues associated with pump placement in prosthetic surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22:10 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11934-020-01027-5.
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2007.00540.X.
Çayan S, Aşcı R, Efesoy O, Bolat MS, Akbay E, Yaman Ö. Comparison of long-term results and couples’ satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1092–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSXM.2019.04.013.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S, et al. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1180–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSXM.2018.05.011.
Kramer AC, Schweber A. Patient expectations prior to coloplast titan penile prosthesis implant predicts postoperative satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2261–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2010.01799.X.
Kava BR, Kanagarajah P, Ayyathurai R. Contemporary revision penile prosthesis surgery is not associated with a high risk of implant colonization or infection: a single-surgeon series. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1540–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1743-6109.2011.02222.X.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stroie, F.A., Taylor, L., Fernandez-Crespo, R. et al. Patient selection, counseling and preparation for penile prosthesis. Int J Impot Res 35, 609–612 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00735-z
This article is cited by
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)