Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

On-demand male contraceptives: gazing at the long road ahead

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data availability

The data in this comment article is not sensitive in nature and is accessible in the public domain. The data is therefore available and not of a confidential nature. All the necessary data has already been included in the manuscript.

References

  1. Hajizadeh M, Nghiem S. Does unwanted pregnancy lead to adverse health and healthcare utilization for mother and child? Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Int J Public Health. 2020;65:457–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-020-01358-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sonfield A, Kost K, Gold RB, Finer LB. The public costs of births resulting from unintended pregnancies: national and state-level estimates. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011;43:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1363/4309411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. di Giacomo E, Pessina R, Santorelli M, Rucco D, Placenti V, Aliberti F, et al. Therapeutic termination of pregnancy and women’s mental health: Determinants and consequences. World J Psychiatry. 2021;11:937–53. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i11.937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. de Irala J, Osorio A, Carlos S, Lopez-del Burgo C. Choice of birth control methods among European women and the role of partners and providers. Contraception. 2011;84:558–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Al Kindi R, Al Salmani A, Al Hadhrami R, Al Sumri S, Al Sumri H. Perspective chapter: modern birth control methods. In: Amarin ZO, editor. Studies in family planning. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.103858.

  6. Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard E, Jensen A, Skovlund CW, Keiding N. Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2257–66. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1111840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fabunmi OA, Dludla PV, Ngcobo SR, Nkambule BB. Investigating the risks of cardiovascular disease among premenopausal women using oral contraceptive: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e071118. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JS, Green J, de Gonzalez AB, Appleby P, Peto J, Plummer M, et al. Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361:1159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12949-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollman MR, Pearce JM. The effects of prenatal deaths on national life expectancy: case study U.S.A. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.06.23286890.

  10. Campo-Engelstein L. Contraceptive justice: why we need a male pill. AMA J Ethics. 2012;14:146–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Page ST, Amory JK, Bremner WJ. Advances in male contraception. Endocr Rev. 2008;29:465–93. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2007-0041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Long JE, Lee MS, Blithe DL. Update on novel hormonal and nonhormonal male contraceptive development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:e2381–92. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab034.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Reynolds-Wright JJ, Cameron NJ, Anderson RA. Will men use novel male contraceptive methods and will women trust them? a systematic review. J Sex Res. 2021;58:838–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1905764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gava G, Meriggiola MC. Acceptability of male hormonal contraception. Female Male Contracept. 2021;415–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70932-7_23.

  15. Balbach M, Rossetti T, Ferreira J, Ghanem L, Ritagliati C, Myers RW, et al. On-demand male contraception via acute inhibition of soluble adenylyl cyclase. Nat Commun. 2023;14:637. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36119-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AD: Data curation, Writing—original draft; RV: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing—original draft; KP: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Resources, Project Administration; All authors commented on subsequent revisions and provided references.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavita Pal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deshpande, A., Varghese, R. & Pal, K. On-demand male contraceptives: gazing at the long road ahead. Int J Impot Res 36, 450–451 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00707-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00707-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links