Vacuum erection device (VED), for its capacity to improve the peak flow and elasticity of cavernous arteries, is a well-known tool to improve recovery of erectile function (EF) after radical prostatectomy. Aim of this study is to compare the different therapeutic schemes proposed in literature to find the most effective timing for VED treatment and to evaluate its efficacy alone or associated with phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i). We performed a systematic review of Literature in October 2022 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials to retrieve all articles dealing with EF rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy (excluding non-English papers, reviews, or meeting abstracts). Patients were divided among those receiving VED alone or combined with other treatments. Study outcomes were compared dividing them between those with follow-up shorter or longer than 12 months. Sixteen papers were included according to selection criteria. Among them, seven were randomized-controlled trials, five were prospective observational studies and four were retrospective. VED alone was evaluated in eight articles, while the remaining papers evaluated the combination of VED with PDE5i. Regarding VED therapeutic protocol, 7/16 studies used it daily. Rehabilitation protocol lasted less than 1 year in 4 studies, up to 12 months in 6 studies and more than 1 year in 6 studies. All the studies show improvement in International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire (IIEF-5), conservation of penile length and satisfactory intercourses when compared to controls. VED results appear to increase when patients were addressed to VED-dedicated programs to enhance their compliance with the device.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The full text of all articles cited in this review have been read and assessed by the Authors. Data are available through the Reference section.
Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, Heidenreich A, Ost P, Procopio G, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1119–34.
Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128:492.
Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, Chen RC, Crispino T, Fontanarosa J, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part II: recommended approaches and details of specific care options. J Urol. 2018;199:990–7.
Moretti TBC, Magna LA, Reis LO. Surgical results and complications for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a reverse systematic review. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;44:150–61.
Moschovas MC, Patel V. Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: how I do it after 15.000 cases. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48:212–9.
Vis AN, van den Bergh RCN, van der Poel HG, Mottrie A, Stricker PD, Graefen M, et al. Selection of patients for nerve sparing surgery in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJUI Compass. 2021;3:6–18.
Rubilotta E, Gubbiotti M, Balzarro M, Castellani D, Pirola GM, Gemma L, et al. Current trends in erectile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: Results from a worldwide survey. Andrologia. 2022;54:e14506.
Yu Ko WF, Degner LF, Hack TF, Schroeder G. Penile length shortening after radical prostatectomy: men’s responses. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010;14:160–5.
Vasconcelos JS, Figueiredo RT, Nascimento FL, Damião R, da Silva EA. The natural history of penile length after radical prostatectomy: a long-term prospective study. Urology. 2012;80:1293–6.
Yuan J, Hoang AN, Romero CA, Lin H, Dai Y, Wang R. Vacuum therapy in erectile dysfunction-science and clinical evidence. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22:211–9.
Albaugh J, Adamic B, Chang C, Nicholas K, Joshua A. Adherence and barriers to penile rehabilitation over 2 years following radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2019;19:89.
Baniel J, Israilov S, Segenreich E, Livne PM. Comparative evaluation of treatments for erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;88:58–62.
Osadchiy V, Eleswarapu SV, Mills SA, Pollard ME, Reiter RE, Mills JN. Efficacy of a preprostatectomy multi-modal penile rehabilitation regimen on recovery of postoperative erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:323–8.
Raina R, Agarwal A, Ausmundson S, Lakin M, Nandipati KC, Montague DK, et al. Early use of vacuum constriction device following radical prostatectomy facilitates early sexual activity and potentially earlier return of erectile function. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18:77–81.
Raina R, Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS, Lakin MM, Zippe CD. Sildenafil citrate and vacuum constriction device combination enhances sexual satisfaction in erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2005;65:360–4.
Raina R, Pahlajani G, Agarwal A, Jones S, Zippe C. Long-term potency after early use of a vacuum erection device following radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106:1719–22.
Rujinithiwat S, Usawachintachit M, Panumatrassamee K, Apirak S, Kavirach T. Early penile rehabilitation with a vacuum erectile device in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized trial. Urol Sci. 2021;32:77–82.
Zhang M, Che JZ, Liu YD, Wang HX, Huang YP, Lv XG, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study on scheduled PDE5i and vacuum erectile devices in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after nerve sparing prostatectomy. Asian J Androl. 2022;24:473–7.
Basal S, Wambi C, Acikel C, Gupta M, Badani K. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function. BJU Int. 2013;111:658–65.
Dalkin BL, Christopher BA. Preservation of penile length after radical prostatectomy: early intervention with a vacuum erection device. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:501–4.
Engel JD. Effect on sexual function of a vacuum erection device post-prostatectomy. Can J Urol. 2011;18:5721–5.
Gontero P, Fontana F, Zitella A, Montorsi F, Frea B. A prospective evaluation of efficacy and compliance with a multistep treatment approach for erectile dysfunction in patients after non-nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;95:359–65.
Jones P, Sandoval Barba H, Johnson MI, Soomro N, Robson W, Ferguson J, et al. Erectile dysfunction after robotic radical prostatectomy: real-life impact of vacuum erection device clinic. J Clin Urol. 2021;14:325–31.
Kimura M, Caso JR, Bañez LL, Koontz BF, Gerber L, Senocak C, et al. Predicting participation in and successful outcome of a penile rehabilitation programme using a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor with a vacuum erection device after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2012;110:E931–8.
Köhler TS, Pedro R, Hendlin K, Utz W, Ugarte R, Reddy P, et al. A pilot study on the early use of the vacuum erection device after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;100:858–62.
Nason GJ, McNamara F, Twyford M, O’Kelly F, White S, Dunne E, et al. Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:205–8.
Yuen W, Witherspoon L, Wu E, Wong J, Sheikholeslami S, Bentley J, et al. Sexual rehabilitation recommendations for prostate cancer survivors and their partners from a biopsychosocial Prostate Cancer Supportive Care Program. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:1853–61.
Feng D, Tang C, Liu S, Yang Y, Han P, Wei W. Current management strategy of treating patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:18–36.
Mehr J, Santarelli S, Green TP, Beetz J, Panuganti S, Wang R. Emerging roles of penile traction therapy and vacuum erectile devices. Sex Med Rev. 2022;10:421–33.
Sultana A, Grice P, Vukina J, Pearce I, Modgil V. Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:84–100.
All the authors have made a substantial contribution to the information or material submitted for publication, have read and approved the final manuscript and have no substantial direct or indirect commercial financial interest associated with publishing the article.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pirola, G.M., Naselli, A., Maggi, M. et al. Vacuum erection device for erectile function rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: which is the correct schedule? Results from a systematic, scoping review. Int J Impot Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00700-w