Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Residual penile curvature correction by modeling during penile prosthesis implantation in Peyronie’s disease patients

Abstract

With the advent of new surgical techniques to treat Peyronie’s disease with concomitant erectile dysfunction, there remains a question of whether manual modeling (MM), an older technique, still has a place in the treatment algorithm within penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. While the implantation of a PP often corrects moderate to severe curvature, penile curvature can remain greater than 30°, even when concurrent MM is performed during prothesis implantation. There are new variations of the MM technique that have been recently utilized in the intraoperative and postoperative setting to achieve penile curvature less than 30° when the implant is fully inflated. The inflatable PP, regardless of the specific model of choice, is preferred over the noninflatable PP when utilizing the MM technique. MM should be the first line of treatment for persisting intraoperative penile curvature after the placement of a PP due to its long-term efficacy, noninvasive approach, and significantly low risk of adverse effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Penile curvature of 90° was appreciated prior to IPP implant (left picture).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The data in this paper can be found by searching the listed references on PubMed.

References

  1. Sandean DP, Lotfollahzadeh S. Peyronie Disease. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

  2. El-Khatib FM, Huynh LM, Yafi FA. Intraoperative methods for residual curvature correction during penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease and refractory erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:43–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. XIAFLEX® (collagenase clostridium histolyticum). Accessed October 1, 2022. https://www.xiaflex.com

  4. Carson CC, Levine LA. Outcomes of surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2014;113:704–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine LA, Dimitriou RJ. A surgical algorithm for penile prosthesis placement in men with erectile failure and Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:147–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucas JW, Gross MS, Barlotta RM, Sudhakar A, Hoover CRV, Wilson SK, et al. Optimal Modeling: an Updated Method for Safely and Effectively Eliminating Curvature During Penile Prosthesis Implantation. Urology. 2020;146:133–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garaffa G, Minervini A, Christopher NA, Minhas S, Ralph DJ. The management of residual curvature after penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2011;108:1152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knoll LD. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosal graft in the surgical management of tunical deficiencies with penile prosthetic surgery. Urology. 2002;59:758–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eigner EB, Kabalin JN, Kessler R. Penile implants in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 1991;145:69–71; discussion -2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mobley DF. Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:225–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. Historical advances in penile prostheses. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12 Suppl 4:S101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson SK. Surgical techniques: modeling technique for penile curvature. J Sex Med. 2007;4:231–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR 2nd. Long-term followup of treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2001;165:825–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Anderson M. Penile prosthetic surgery for Peyronie’s disease: defining the need for intraoperative adjuvant maneuvers. J Sex Med. 2004;1:318–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadioglu A, Sanli O, Akman T, Cakan M, Erol B, Mamadov F. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a single center experience with 145 patients. Eur Urol. 2008;53:432–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tausch TJ, Chung PH, Siegel JA, Gliga L, Klein AK, Morey AF. Intraoperative Decision-making for Precise Penile Straightening During Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery. Urology. 2015;86:1048–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chung PH, Scott JF, Morey AF. High patient satisfaction of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion with synchronous penile plication for erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2014;11:1593–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perito P, Wilson S. The Peyronie’s plaque “scratch”: an adjunct to modeling. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1194–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghanem HM, Fahmy I, el-Meliegy A. Malleable penile implants without plaque surgery in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 1998;10:171–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung E, Solomon M, DeYoung L, Brock GB. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie’s disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2855–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study. J Urol. 2001;166:932–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moncada I, Krishnappa P, Ascencios J, Lopez I, Martinez-Salamanca JI. Home modeling after penile prosthesis implantation in the management of residual curvature in Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:616–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Scott Bailey, PhD, for his efforts in editing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and/or designed the work that led to the submission, acquired data, and/or played an important role in interpreting the results: WJC, BJH, WJGH. Drafted or revised the manuscript: WJC, BJH. Approved the final version: WJGH. Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: WJGH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne J. G. Hellstrom.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conlon, W.J., Herzog, B.J. & Hellstrom, W.J.G. Residual penile curvature correction by modeling during penile prosthesis implantation in Peyronie’s disease patients. Int J Impot Res 35, 639–642 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00694-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00694-5

Search

Quick links