Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Majority of erectile dysfunction patients would have preferred earlier implantation of their penile prosthesis: validation of the recently changed EAU guidelines

Abstract

Until 2019, the European Association of Urology guidelines recommended the implantation of a penile prosthesis as a third-line therapy, which has since then changed to “if other treatments fail or depending on the patient’s preference”. Primary endpoint was to assess whether patients with a penile prosthesis and their partner would have preferred earlier implantation. Secondary endpoints were the reason why patient and partner wanted earlier implantation, how much earlier they wanted it, satisfaction of patient and partner and if patient and partner would have recommended the intervention. We selected patients with a virgin inflatable penile prosthesis operated between April 2013 and December 2019. We included 155 patients and 65 partners. Telephonic interview was conducted in a structured manner. Further data were collected retrospectively. The preference for earlier implantation was reported in 59.4% of patients and 46.2% of partners. Of them, respectively 53.2% and 46.6% would have wanted the prosthesis more than 5 years earlier. Satisfaction was seen in 83.2% of patients and 73.8% of partners. Respectively 82.6% and 78.4% of patients and partners would recommend the procedure. Our results indicate that a more patient-oriented approach with good counseling is desirable and that the “three-level” concept must be abandoned.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Preference for earlier penile implant predicted by Peyronie’s disease and after RP.

Data availability

All relevant data are available in the article. Additional data are available upon request.

References

  1. Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80:333–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka Y, Bundy JD, Allen NB, Uddin SMI, Feldman DI, Michos ED, et al. Association of Erectile Dysfunction with incident atrial fibrillation: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Med. 2020;133:613–620.e611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao B, Hong Z, Wei Y, Yu D, Xu J, Zhang W. Erectile dysfunction predicts cardiovascular events as an independent risk factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1005–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Q, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li S, Cheng Y, Guo J, et al. Erectile dysfunction and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1073–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Esposito K, Giugliano F, Di Palo C, Giugliano G, Marfella R, D’Andrea F, et al. Effect of lifestyle changes on erectile dysfunction in obese men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:2978–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baas W, O’Connor B, Welliver C, Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Wilson SK, et al. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajic P, Mahon J, Faraday M, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Hakim L, McVary KT. Etiology of erectile dysfunction and duration of symptoms in patients undergoing penile prosthesis: a systematic review. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8:333–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Porst H, Burnett A, Brock G, Ghanem H, Giuliano F, Glina S, et al. SOP conservative (medical and mechanical) treatment of erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:130–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eardley I, Donatucci C, Corbin J, El-Meliegy A, Hatzimouratidis K, McVary K, et al. Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:524–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jorissen C, De Bruyna H, Baten E, Van Renterghem K. Clinical outcome: patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery. Curr Urol. 2019;13:94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauwers NL, Van Renterghem K, Osmonov D, Suarez-Sarmiento A, Perito P, Park S, et al. Analysis of the effects of different surgical approaches on corporotomy localization in inflatable penile implant surgery performed by expert implant surgeons. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00593-1. Epub ahead of print.

  14. Mahon J, Dornbier R, Wegrzyn G, Faraday MM, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Hakim L, et al. Infectious adverse events following the placement of a penile prosthesis: a systematic review. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8:348–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vakalopoulos I, Kampantais S, Ioannidis S, Laskaridis L, Dimopoulos P, Toutziaris C, et al. High patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prostheses implantation correlates with female partner satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2013;10:2774–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KC, Brock GB. Strategies for maintaining penile size following penile implant. Transl Androl Urol. 2013;2:67–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pescatori E, Alei G, Antonini G, Avolio A, Bettocchi C, Bitelli M, et al. INSIST-ED: Italian Society of Andrology registry on penile prosthesis surgery. First data analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88:122–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Henry GD, Karpman E, Brant W, Christine B, Kansas BT, Khera M, et al. The who, how and what of real-world penile implantation in 2015: the PROPPER Registry Baseline Data. J Urol. 2016;195:427–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van Renterghem K, Deho F Perspective on the PHOENIX trial: prospective registry for patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation for male erectile dysfunction in multiple European centers. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00547-7. Epub ahead of print.

Download references

Acknowledgements

All contributors to the article are mentioned in the author list. We would like to thank our surgical team for their great work resulting in our high quality of care.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KVR was responsible for research conceptualization. AVH and JM were responsible for data collection. AVH, JM, and KVR were responsible for data analysis and interpretation. AVH and KVR were responsible for writing the original draft. AVH was responsible for creating graphical representations. AVH, EC, and KVR were responsible for final review and editing. KVR was responsible for supervision of the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andries Van Huele.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (f/2021/043).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Huele, A., Mennes, J., Chung, E. et al. Majority of erectile dysfunction patients would have preferred earlier implantation of their penile prosthesis: validation of the recently changed EAU guidelines. Int J Impot Res (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00620-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00620-1

Search

Quick links