Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

IJIR publishes special/guest-edited issues and topical collections. The peer review process for articles included in topical collections/special issues is the same as the peer review process of the journal in general. Additionally, if the Guest Editors author an article in their topical collection/special issue, they will not handle the peer review process.​

How do heterosexual men and women rate their orgasms in a relational context?

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 35, pages 164–169 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The orgasm experience refers to the psychological self-evaluation of the orgasm. No previous research has compared the characteristics of the orgasm experience between men and women creating a ranking of the adjectives that better represent it. The main objective of this study was to analyze gender differences in the global orgasm experience, its dimensions, and its descriptive words to examine how do heterosexual people rate their orgasms. A sample of 1619 heterosexual adults (793 men, 826 women) completed a background questionnaire and the Orgasm Rating Scale. Results showed that there were significant gender differences in the global orgasm experience and three of its dimensions. Furthermore, fourteen of the 25 descriptive words showed differences between genders. In the ranking, the top five adjectives that better described the orgasm experience were the same in both genders. In conclusion, although differences across gender in the orgasm experience were observed, heterosexual men and women share similar adjectives to rate their orgasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Data availability

Data will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Arcos-Romero AI, Sierra JC. Factors associated with subjective orgasm experience in heterosexual relationships. J Sex Marital Ther. 2020;46:314–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1711273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Opperman E, Braun V, Clarke V, Rogers C. “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. J Sex Res. 2014;51:503–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/002244992012753982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mah K, Binik YM. The nature of human orgasm: a critical review of major trends. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:823–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00069-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arcos-Romero AI, Granados MR, Sierra JC. Relationship between orgasm experience and sexual excitation: validation of the model of the subjective orgasm experience. Int J Impot Res. 2019;31:282–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0095-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herbenick D, Fu TC, Arter J, Sanders SA, Dodge B. Women’s experiences with genital touching, sexual pleasure, and orgasm: Results from a US probability sample of women ages 18 to 94. J Sex Marital Ther. 2018;44:201–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1346530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paterson L, Jin ES, Amsel R, Binik YM. Gender similarities and differences in sexual arousal, desire, and orgasmic pleasure in the laboratory. J Sex Res. 2014;51:801–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/002244992013867922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salisbury CM, Fisher WA. “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual sexual interactions. J Sex Res. 2014;51:616–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/002244992013838934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia JR, Lloyd EA, Wallen K, Fisher HE. Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of US singles. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2645–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnett MD, Moore JM, Woolford BA, Riggs SA. Interest in partner orgasm: Sex differences and relationships with attachment strategies. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;124:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubray S, Gérard M, Beaulieu-Prévost D, Courtois F. Validation of a self-reported questionnaire assessing the bodily and physiological sensations of orgasm. J Sex Med. 2017;14:255–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mah K, Binik YM. Do all orgasms feel alike? Evaluating a two‐dimensional model of the orgasm experience across gender and sexual context. J Sex Res. 2002;39:104–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Frederick DA, John HKS, Garcia JR, Lloyd EA. Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a US national sample. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47:273–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kontula O, Miettinen A. Determinants of female sexual orgasms. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2016;6:31624. https://doi.org/10.3402/snpv631624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vance EB, Wagner NN. Written descriptions of orgasm: a study of sex differences. Arch Sex Behav. 1976;5:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer CF. Comparing orgasm descriptions between the sexes. Master’s thesis, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, USA; 2014. https://encompass.eku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1301&context=etd.

  16. Arcos-Romero AI, Moyano N, Sierra JC. Psychometric properties of the Orgasm Rating Scale (ORS) in context of sexual relationship in a Spanish sample. J Sex Med. 2018;15:741–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arcos-Romero AI, Sierra JC. Factorial invariance, differential item functioning, and norms of the Orgasm Rating Scale. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019;19:57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sierra JC, Ortiz A, Calvillo C, Arcos-Romero AI. Subjective orgasm in the context of solitary masturbation. Rev Int Androl. 2021;19:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/jandrol201910001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Álvarez-Muelas A, Gómez-Berrocal C, Sierra JC. Study of sexual satisfaction in different typologies of adherence to the sexual double standard. Front Psychol. 2021;11:609571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609571.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Carreno DF, Eisenbeck N, Cangas AJ, García-Montes JM, Del Vas LG, María AT. Spanish adaptation of the personal meaning profile-brief: meaning in life, psychological well-being, and distress. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2020;20:151–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sierra JC, Moyano N, Vallejo-Medina P, Gómez-Berrocal C. An abridge Spanish version of Sexual Double Standard Scale: factorial structure, reliability and validity evidence. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018;18:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/jijchp201705003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cabin RJ, Mitchell RJ. To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: when and how are the questions. Bull Ecol Soc Am. 2000;81:246–8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20168454.

  23. Nobre PJ. Sexual dysfunction. In: SG Hofmann, editor. Clinical psychology: a global perspective. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New Jersey, USA; 2018. pp. 225–42.

  24. Lee DM, Nazroo J, O’Connor DB, Blake M, Pendleton N. Sexual health and well-being among older men and women in England: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45:133–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0465-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moura C, Tavares I, Nobre PJ. Cognitive-Affective factors and female orgasm: a comparative study on women with and without orgasm difficulties. J Sex Med. 2020;17:2220–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjsxm202008005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakaluk JK, Todd LM, Milhausen R, Lachowsky NJ. Undergraduate Research Group in Sexuality. Dominant heterosexual sexual scripts in emerging adulthood: conceptualization and measurement. J Sex Res. 2014;51:516–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/002244992012745473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piemonte JL, Conley TD, Gusakova S. Orgasm, gender, and responses to heterosexual casual sex. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;151:109487. https://doi.org/10.1016/jpaid201906030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nobre PJ, Pinto-Gouveia J. Emotions during sexual activity: differences between sexually functional and dysfunctional men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35:491–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9047-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Arcos-Romero AI, Expósito-Guerra D, Sierra JC. Sexual desire and its relationship with subjective orgasm experience. Int J Impot Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00375-7.

  30. Herbenick D, Fu TC, Owens C, Bartelt E, Dodge B, Reece M, et al. Kissing, cuddling, and massage at most recent sexual event: findings from a US nationally representative probability sample. J Sex Marital Ther. 2019;45:159–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2018.1494648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Townes A, Thorpe S, Parmer T, Wright B, Herbenick D. Partnered sexual behaviors, pleasure, and orgasms at last sexual encounter: findings from a US probability sample of black women ages 18 to 92 years. J Sex Marital Ther. 2021;47:353–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X20211878315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA, Dodge B, Fortenberry JD. An event-level analysis of the sexual characteristics and composition among adults ages 18 to 59: results from a national probability sample in the United States. J Sex Med. 2010;7:346–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1743-6109201002020x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lucena BB, Abdo CHN. Personal factors that contribute to or impair women’s ability to achieve orgasm. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26:177–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2014.8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cervilla O, Vallejo-Medina P, Gómez-Berrocal C, de la Torre D, Sierra JC. Validation of the orgasm rating scale in the context of masturbation. Psicothema. 2022;34:151–9. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mangas P, Granados R, Cervilla O, Sierra JC. Validation of the orgasm rating scale in context of sexual relationships of gay and lesbian adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020887.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Loyola University, Seville, Spain

    Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero

  2. Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Centre, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

    Juan Carlos Sierra

Authors
  1. Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Carlos Sierra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: AIAR and JCS. Methodology: AIAR and JCS. Data analysis: AIAR. Writing and editing: AIAR and JCS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Isabel Arcos-Romero.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arcos-Romero, A.I., Sierra, J.C. How do heterosexual men and women rate their orgasms in a relational context?. Int J Impot Res 35, 164–169 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00558-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00558-4

Search

Advanced search

Quick links