Abstract
Patients who undergo penile prosthesis implantation as treatment for erectile dysfunction commonly complain of penile shortening after implantation. We conducted a study to determine whether knowledge of pre-operative stretched penile length measurement influences patient satisfaction. This prospective study consisted of 149 patients undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation from August 2017 to December 2019. Study group participants underwent pre-operative stretched penile length measurement in clinic while the control group did not. Six months post-operatively, patients completed a modified 14-item Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire to assess overall satisfaction and penile length satisfaction. A total of 102 patients were eligible for final analysis (49 in study group, 53 in control). Mean scores for overall treatment satisfaction were 3.57 and 3.53 (scale from 0 to 4) in the study versus control group, respectively (p = 0.483). Mean scores for satisfaction with penile length were 4.08 and 4.11 (scale from 1 to 5) in the study vs. control group (p = 0.645). The study suggests that knowledge of pre-operative stretched penile length does not influence post-operative satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Therefore, performing pre-operative measurements in clinic solely for informing the patient may be unnecessary. Current interventions aimed at conserving penile length may be effective at maintaining satisfaction with penile length.
Trial Registration- This trial is registered and approved by the IRB committee at our institution, ID: HSC-MS-19-0320.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miranda-Sousa A, Keating M, Moreira S, Baker M, Carrion R. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1494–9.
Jorissen C, De Brunya H, Baten E, Renterghem KV. Clinical outcome: patient and partner satisfaction after penile implant surgery. Curr Urol. 2019;13:94–100.
Rajpurkar A, Dhabuwala CB. Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. J Urol. 2003;170:159–63.
Habous M, Giona S, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Abdelwahab O, et al. Penile length is preserved after implant surgery. BJU Int. 2019;123:885–90.
Pryor M, Carrion R, Wang R, Henry G. Patient satisfaction and penile morphology changes with postoperative penile rehabilitation 2 years after Coloplast Titan prosthesis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:754–8.
Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan J, Lin H, Dai Y. Prospective and long‑term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:411–5.
Osterberg E, Maganty A, Ramasamy R, Eid JF. Pharmacologically induced erect penile length and stretched penile length are both good predictors of post-inflatable prosthesis penile length. Int J Impot Res. 2014;26:128–31.
Althof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, Levine F, Burnett AL, McVary K, et al. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology.1999;53:793–9.
Vitarelli A, Divenuto L, Fortunato F, Falco A, Pagliarulo V, Antonini G, et al. Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85:133–7.
Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1503–12.
Narang G, Figler B, Coward R. Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S869–80.
Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1128–31.
Engel J, Sutherland D, Williams S, Wagner KR. Changes in penile length after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011;25:65–9.
Akin-Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall J. Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2006;3:743–8.
Howell S, Palasi S, Green T, Kannady C, Panuganti S, Slaughter K, et al. Comparison of satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation in patients with radical prostatectomy or radical cystoprostatectomy to the general population. J Sex Med. 2021;9:100300.
Clavell-Hernandez J, Ermeç B, Kadıoğlu A, Wang R. Perplexity of penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy. Turk J Urol. 2019;45:77–82.
Gittens P, Moskovic D, Avila D Jr, Chandrashekar A, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Favorable female sexual function is associated with patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation”. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1996–2001.
Mulhall J, Ahmed A, Branch J, Parker M. Serial assessment of efficacy and satisfaction profiles following penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2003;169:1429–33.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1016.
Schover LR. Sex therapy for the penile prosthesis recipient. Urol Clin North Am. 1989;16:91–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SP: writing (original draft), data collection, results analysis, editing. SH: writing (original draft), data collection, results analysis. TPG: data collection. CK: data collection. KBS: data collection. BY: results analysis. SP: results analysis, supervision, editing. JASB: conceptualization. JCH: conceptualization. RW: conceptualization, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
RW, MD is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Coloplast and Teleflex.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palasi, S., Howell, S., Green, T.P. et al. Does knowing pre-operative penile length influence patient satisfaction post penile prosthesis implantation?. Int J Impot Res 34, 776–780 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00472-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00472-1
This article is cited by
-
Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie’s disease
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
Comment on “Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie’s disease”
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)
-
Comment on Does knowing pre-operative penile length influence patient satisfaction post penile prosthesis implantation?
International Journal of Impotence Research (2022)