Abstract
The inflatable penile prosthesis was first implanted with a large vertical suprapubic incision. Nowadays, three surgical approaches are utilized: penoscrotal, infrapubic, and subcoronal. Globally the penoscrotal approach is used most often. Our first author describes nuances of the high transverse scrotal incision technique gained over 48 years of experience. Many of these methods will interest the reader because they are divergent from the common practice of implanters across the world. These distinctions are designed to diminish the risk of infection, speed up the surgery, and improve outcomes for both the patient and his surgeon.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence. Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.
Sorensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2012;147:373–83.
Silverstein A, Henry GD, Delk JR, Wilson S, Donatucci CF. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus as a potential risk factor for infection after penile prosthesis placement. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:S61.
Carbone DJ, Daitch JA, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM, Montague DK. Management of severe corporal fibrosis with implantation of prosthesis via a transverse scrotal approach. J Urol. 1998;159:125–7.
Wang Q, Goswami K, Shohat N, Aalirezaie A, Manrique J, Parvizi J. Longer operative time results in a higher rate of subsequent periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing primary joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2019;34:947–53.
Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case value on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.
Wilson SK, Simhan J, Gross M. Cylinder Insertion into scarred corporal bodies: prosthetic urology’s most difficult challenge. Int J Impot Res. 2020. [epublished ahead of print].
Wilson SK, Simhan J, Carrion R. IPP cylinders out of place during implantation. Int J Impot Res. 2020. [epublished ahead of print].
Wilson SK, Parker J, Carrion R, Simhan J. Out of place cylinders discovered in the post-operative period. Int J Impot Res. 2020. [epublished ahead of print].
Welliver C, Kottwitz M, Ahmad AE, Wilson SK, Kohler TS. Manufacturers data show increasing implanted cylinder sizes and measured corporal lengths in inflatable penile implants. World J Urol. 2016;34:993–8.
Hernandez JC, Trost L, Kohler T, Ring J, Traweek R, Alom M, Wang R. Emerging complications following alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a 5-year multi-institutional experience. J Urol. 2019;201:581–6.
Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Siegel A, Seftel A, Shannon L. Multi institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:535–8.
Muench PJ. Infections versus penile implants: the war on bugs. J Urol. 2013;189:1631–7.
Wilson SK. The top five surgical things I wish I had known earlier in my career. Lessons learned from prosthetic urology. J Sex Med. 2018;15:809–12.
Lu JY, Miller EJ, Welliver C. A thematic analysis of the online discussion board, FrankTalk regarding penile implant. J Sex Med. 2020;17:325–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
SW: Consultant: AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices. Lecturer Boston Scientific. Stockholder NeoTract. PP: Consultant Boston Scientific, Coloplast. SP: Consultant Boston Scientific, Coloplast. JM: Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, S.K., Perito, P., Park, S.S.H. et al. Unexpected nuances of the penoscrotal inflatable penile prosthesis. Int J Impot Res 34, 416–423 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0341-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0341-6
This article is cited by
-
Celebrating 50 years of penile implants
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)