Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS® system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 33, pages 577–582 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are the most common adverse effects encountered by patients following radical prostatectomy (RP) [1]. Mild to severe SUI is often managed by further surgical procedures, in cases of conservative management failure [2, 3].

A variety of continence devices have been proposed. To date, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is considered the gold standard, despite its expense, incidence of postoperative complications, as well as its not insignificant revision rates [4]. As a result, alternative systems such as the male sling and compressive urethral devices have been proposed [2, 5].

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Penile prosthesis implantation.
Fig. 2: ATOMS implantation.
Fig. 3: Double implantation.

References

  1. Patel VR, Sivaraman A, Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, et al. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59:702–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giammò A, Ammirati E, Morgia G, Sandri S, Introini C, Canepa G, et al. Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: an italian multicentric study. Eur Urol Suppl. 2018;17:249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(18)33196-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dosanjh A, Baldwin S, Mytton J, King D, Trudgill N, Belal M, et al. A national study of artificial urinary sphincter and male sling implantation after radical prostatectomy in England. BJU Int. 2020;125:467–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biardeau X, Aharony S, Campeau L, Corcos J. Artificial urinary sphincter: report of the 2015 consensus conference. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:S8–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22989.

  5. MacDonald S, Colaco M, Terlecki R. Waves of change: national trends in surgical management of male stress incontinence. Urology. 2017;108:175–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loertzer H, Huesch T, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Anding R, Rose A, Brehmer B, et al. Retropubic vs transobturator Argus adjustable male sling: results from a multicenter study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39:987–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Salonia A, Adaikan G, Buvat J, Carrier S, El-Meliegy A, Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Sexual rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer—part 1: recommendations from the fourth international consultation for sexual medicine (ICSM 2015). J Sex Med. 2017;14:285–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim DS, Yang KM, Chung HJ, Choi HM, Choi YD, Choi HK. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2602–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01801.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dhar NB, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CXTM/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2006;176:2599–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Falcone M, Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Preto M, et al. Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction rate after the AMS spectra penile prosthesis implantation. Urology. 2013;82:373–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rolle L, Ceruti C, Sedigh O, Timpano M, Destefanis P, Lillaz B, et al. Surgical implantation of artificial urinary device and penile prosthesis through trans-scrotal incision for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction: synchronous or delayed procedure? Urology. 2012;80:1046–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martínez-Salamanca JI, Espinós EL, Moncada I, Portillo LD, Carballido J. Management of end-stage erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy by simultaneous dual implantation using a single trans-scrotal incision: surgical technique and outcomes. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:792–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.143757.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Kawaguchi S, et al. Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:726–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw JW, Reardon G, Sandor DW, Rosen RC, Ferguson DM. Validation of stopwatch measurements of erection duration against responses to the sexual encounter profile and international index of erectile function in patients treated with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. J Sex Med. 2010;7:1147–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01643.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Althof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, Levine F, Burnett AL, McVary K, et al. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1999;53:793–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10:603–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goode PS, Burgio KL, Johnson TM, Clay OJ, Roth DL, Markland AD, et al. Behavioral therapy with or without biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation for persistent postprostatectomy incontinence: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:151–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century:a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:681–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferro M, Bottero D, D’Elia C, Matei DV, Cioffi A, Cozzi G, et al. Virtue male sling for post-prostatectomy stress incontinence: a prospective evaluation and mid-term outcomes. BJU Int. 2017;119:482–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giammò A, Ammirati E, Tullio A, Bodo G, Manassero A, Gontero P, et al. Implant of ATOMS® system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: results of a single centre. Int Braz J Urol. 2019;45:127–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, Da Pozzo LF, Nava L, Barbieri L, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol. 1997;158:1408–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mykoniatis I, Albersen M, Andrianne R, Sokolakis I, Hatzichristodoulou G, Sempels M, et al. Synchronous surgery for the combined treatment of post-radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence: a lucrative evolution or an unnecessary complexity? Int J Impot Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0253-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson SK, Aliotta PJ, Salem EA, Mulcahy JJ. New enhancements of the scrotal one-incision technique for placement of artificial urinary sphincter allow proximal cuff placement. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3510–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01933.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sellers CL, Morey AF, Jones LA. Cost and time benefits of dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prosthetics by single incision. Urology. 2005;65:852–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rhee EY. Technique for concomitant implantation of the penile prosthesis with the male sling. J Urol. 2005;173:925–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154023.93188.9c.

  26. Gorbatiy V, Westney OL, Romero C, Wang R. Outcomes of simultaneous placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis and a male urethral sling through a single perineal incision. J Sex Med. 2010;7:832–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01506.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yafi FA, Andrianne R, Alzweri L, Brady J, Butcher M, Chevalier D, et al. Andrianne mini-jupette graft at the time of inflatable penile prosthesis placement for the management of post-prostatectomy climacturia and minimal urinary incontinence. J Sex Med. 2018;15:789–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express a great appreciation to all physicians involved in this study for the great interest demonstrated toward this ambitious project and the accuracy demonstrated in collecting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino—Presidio Unità Spinale Unipolare—SC Neurourologia, Turin, Italy

    Marco Falcone, Enrico Ammirati, Roberto Carone, Paolo Gontero & Alessandro Giammò

  2. A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino—Presidio Molinette—SCDU Urologia, Turin, Italy

    Marco Falcone, Mirko Preto & Enrico Ammirati

  3. Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

    Gideon Blecher

  4. The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

    Gideon Blecher

  5. Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia

    Gideon Blecher

Authors
  1. Marco Falcone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mirko Preto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enrico Ammirati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gideon Blecher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roberto Carone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paolo Gontero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alessandro Giammò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Falcone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or nonfinancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falcone, M., Preto, M., Ammirati, E. et al. Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS® system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study. Int J Impot Res 33, 577–582 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0320-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0320-y

Search

Advanced search

Quick links