It is safe to say that the overwhelming majority of cylinders out of place result from surgeon error at the time of implantation. There are some instances where patient comorbidities could increase the difficulty of accurate development of cylinder insertion or space. Most of the time the operator recognizes his instrument out of place and corrects it intraoperatively. Other times the surgeon makes a flawed movement with a sharp instrument piercing some tissue. When the cylinder is placed initially and inflated the wayward position is usually not evident. However, in the postoperative period, the inaccurate position of the cylinder(s) can become readily apparent. The reader will notice this repeatedly stressed in Wilson’s Workshop—over 90% of cylinders that are out of position can be diagnosed or prevented if one utilizes the two safety checks outlined below.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Kohler TK, Gupta NK, Wilson SK. Pearls perils and pitfalls of penile prosthesis surgery. Fort Smith, AR: Calvert McBride Publishing; 2018.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. A new treatment of Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1994;52:121–3.
Wilson SK, Simhan J. Is modeling an inflatable penile prosthesis obsolete for patients with Peyronie’s disease? Int J Impot Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0230-z.
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Terry T. Improved implant survival in patients with severe corporal fibrosis: a new technique without the necessity of grafting. J Urol. 1995;153:359–62.
Henry GD, Carrion R, Jennermann C, Wang R. Prospective evaluation of postoperative penile rehabilitation: Penile length/girth maintenance 1 year following Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1298–304.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. Prevention and treatment of complications of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a review article. Arch Esp de Urol. 1996;49:306–11.
Moncada I, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Jara j, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporal dilatation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique. J Urol. 2010;183:1123–6.
Wilson SK, Bella AJ, Delk JR, Henry GR, Jones LR, Zafar F, Moncada I. Dilatation is not necessary for insertion of new AMS 700MS inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2007;5:16.
Carson C, Noh C. Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or Gortex windsock reinforcement. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:81–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900829.
Wilson SK, Neeb AD, Delk JR II. A new technique to repair proximal corporal perforation during prosthesis implantation: rear tip extender suture sling. J Sex Med. 2006;3:87–9.
Conflict of interest
SKW: Consultant AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices, Stockholder Neotract, Lecturer Boston Scientific. RC: Consultant Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Endo Pharmaceuticals. JS: Consultant Boston Scientific, Coloplast.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, S.K., Simhan, J. & Carrion, R. Inflatable penile prosthesis cylinders out of place during implantation. Int J Impot Res 32, 598–605 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0293-x
This article is cited by
International Journal of Impotence Research (2023)