Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A modern review of penile traction monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of peyronie’s disease

Abstract

Peyronie’s disease (PD)-related penile deformity is managed with multiple treatment modalities including oral medications, intralesional injections, and surgery. Penile traction therapy (PTT) is one such modality with purported benefits, albeit with notable differences in the characteristics of available traction devices and published study protocols. We provide a comprehensive review of the available data supporting PTT for PD treatment. We performed a rigorous database search to identify all studies pertaining to PTT for the treatment of PD through November 2019. Seventeen trials explored use of PTT as monotherapy or in combination with surgical or nonsurgical treatment, using over five different commercially available devices. All devices were well tolerated, although compliance and daily duration of use were highly variable. PTT resulted in variable improvements in stretched penile length and penile curvature, depending on study protocol, patient population, and device. PTT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment for PD as monotherapy or in combination with other nonsurgical and surgical treatments, and for men in both the acute and chronic phases. Further studies are needed to compare available devices, evaluate device characteristics associated with treatment success, differentiate outcomes in acute vs. chronic PD populations, and determine the optimal duration of use.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Pubmed database search.

References

  1. 1.

    Hellstrom WJ. History, epidemiology, and clinical presentation of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:S91–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Arafa M, Eid H, El-Badry A, Ezz-Eldine K, Shamloul R. The prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:213–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dibenedetti DB, Nguyen D, Zografos L, Ziemiecki R, Zhou X. A population-based study of Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and treatment patterns in the United States. Adv Urol. 2011;2011:282503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    La Pera G, Pescatori ES, Calabrese M, Boffini A, Colombo F, Andriani E, et al. Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking. A multicenter population-based study in men aged 50-69 years. Eur Urol. 2001;40:525–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mulhall JP, Creech SD, Boorjian SA, Ghaly S, Kim ED, Moty A, et al. Subjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie’s disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2004;171:2350–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chung E, De Young L, Solomon M, Brock GB. Peyronie’s disease and mechanotransduction: an in vitro analysis of the cellular changes to Peyronie’s disease in a cell-culture strain system. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1259–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Terrier JE, Nelson CJ. Psychological aspects of Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:290–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Scroppo FI, Mancini M, Maggi M, Colpi GM. Can an external penis stretcher reduce Peyronie's penile curvature? Int J Impot Res. 2001;13.

  9. 9.

    Gontero P, Di Marco M, Giubilei G, Bartoletti R, Pappagallo G, Tizzani A, et al. Use of penile extender device in the treatment of penile curvature as a result of Peyronie’s disease. Results of a phase II prospective study. J Sex Med. 2009;6:558–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Martinez-Salamanca JI, Egui A, Moncada I, Minaya J, Ballesteros CM, Del Portillo L, et al. Acute phase Peyronie’s disease management with traction device: a nonrandomized prospective controlled trial with ultrasound correlation. J Sex Med. 2014;11:506–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Levine LA, Newell M, Taylor FL. Penile traction therapy for treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a single-center pilot study. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1468–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moncada I, Krishnappa P, Romero J, Torremade J, Fraile A, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile traction therapy with the new device ‘Penimaster PRO’ is effective and safe in the stable phase of Peyronie’s disease: a controlled multicentre study. BJU Int. 2019;123:694–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hellstrom WJ, Feldman R, Rosen RC, Smith T, Kaufman G, Tursi J. Bother and distress associated with Peyronie’s disease: validation of the Peyronie’s disease questionnaire. J Urol. 2013;190:627–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ziegelmann MJ, Viers BR, Montgomery BD, Avant RA, Savage JB, Trost LW. Clinical experience with penile traction therapy among men undergoing collagenase clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie disease. Urology. 2017;104:102–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stewart CA, Yafi FA, Knoedler M, Mandava SH, McCaslin IR, Sangkum P, et al. Intralesional injection of Interferon-alpha2b improves penile curvature in men with Peyronie’s disease independent of plaque location. J Urol. 2015;194:1704–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ziegelmann M, Savage J, Toussi A, Alom M, Yang D, Kohler T, et al. Outcomes of a novel penile traction device in men with peyronie’s disease: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. J Urol. 2019;202:599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rosen RC, Allen KR, Ni X, Araujo AB. Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1010–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ibrahim A, Gazzard L, Alharbi M, Rompre-Brodeur A, Aube M, Carrier S. Evaluation of oral pentoxifylline, colchicine, and penile traction for the management of Peyronie’s disease. Sex Med. 2019;7:459–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Abern MR, Larsen S, Levine LA. Combination of penile traction, intralesional verapamil, and oral therapies for Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2012;9:288–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yafi FA, Pinsky MR, Stewart C, Sangkum P, Ates E, Trost LW, et al. The effect of duration of penile traction therapy in patients undergoing intralesional injection therapy for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol. 2015;194:754–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gallo L, Sarnacchiaro P. Ten-year experience with multimodal treatment for acute phase Peyronie’s disease: a real life clinical report. Actas Urol Esp. 2019;43:182–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gelbard M, Goldstein I, Hellstrom WJ, McMahon CG, Smith T, Tursi J, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of collagenase clostridium histolyticum for the treatment of peyronie disease in 2 large double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled phase 3 studies. J Urol. 2013;190:199–207.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Levine LA, Cuzin B, Mark S, Gelbard MK, Jones NA, Liu G, et al. Clinical safety and effectiveness of collagenase clostridium histolyticum injection in patients with Peyronie’s disease: a phase 3 open-label study. J Sex Med. 2015;12:248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gelbard M, Lipshultz LI, Tursi J, Smith T, Kaufman G, Levine LA. Phase 2b study of the clinical efficacy and safety of collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in patients with Peyronie disease. J Urol. 2012;187:2268–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Alom M, Sharma KL, Toussi A, Kohler T, Trost L. Efficacy of combined collagenase clostridium histolyticum and restoreX penile traction therapy in men with Peyronie’s disease. J Sex Med. 2019;16:891–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rybak J, Papagiannopoulos D, Levine L. A retrospective comparative study of traction therapy vs. no traction following tunica albuginea plication or partial excision and grafting for Peyronie’s disease: measured lengths and patient perceptions. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Levine LA, Rybak J. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2112–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wymer K, Kohler T, Trost L. Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, collagenase clostridium histolyticum, and penile traction therapy in men with peyronie’s disease in an era of effective clinical treatment. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1421–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen R, McCraw C, Lewis R. Plication procedures-excisional and incisional corporoplasty and imbrication for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:318–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Haney NM, Kohn TP, Nichols PE, Jg Hellstrom W. The effect of adjunct mechanical traction on penile length in men undergoing primary treatment for peyronie’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2018;122:110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nikoobakht M, Shahnazari A, Rezaeidanesh M, Mehrsai A, Pourmand G. Effect of penile-extender device in increasing penile size in men with shortened penis: preliminary results. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3188–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nowroozi MR, Amini E, Ayati M, Jamshidian H, Radkhah K, Amini S. Applying extender devices in patients with penile dysmorphophobia: assessment of tolerability, efficacy, and impact on erectile function. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1242–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Ziegelmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bole, R., White, L., Parikh, N. et al. A modern review of penile traction monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res 33, 251–258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0247-3

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links