Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty in transgender men: a multicentric retrospective cohort analysis

A Correction to this article was published on 02 April 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

A variety of approaches are available to address a genital gender affirming surgery (GGAS) in transgender men. The aim of the present study is to report surgical and functional outcomes after a suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty (SPP). From November 2008 to August 2018, a consecutive series of 34 patients underwent an SPP in two tertiary referral centers. GGAS was conducted as a multistaged procedure, consisting (1) SPP with subsequent radial artery-based forearm free-flap urethroplasty, (2) glans sculpting, urethral anastomosis, and scrotoplasty, and (3) penile prosthesis implantation. The duration of surgery, intra and postoperative complications, and hospital stay were selected as variables for surgical outcomes. Functional outcomes were extrapolated from a four-item questionnaire.A partial necrosis of phallus was detected in two cases (5.8 %). Two cases of seroma formation with wound dehiscence (5.8%) were detected. Overall, 89% of patients declared to be fully satisfied of the SPP, 83% would recommend the procedure to someone else, and 89% would undergo the same procedure again. Overall, 66% of patients could achieve an orgasm during sexual penetrative intercourses. The retrospective design, the lack of randomization and validated questionnaire for outcomes reporting, and the limited follow-up represent the main drawbacks of our study. Our evidences suggest that SPP represents as an acceptable option for GGAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Hage JJ, Bloem JJ, Suliman HM. Review of the literature on techniques for phalloplasty with emphasis on the applicability in female-to-male transsexuals. J Urol. 1993;150:1093–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bettocchi C, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Pedicled pubic phalloplasty in females with gender dysphoria. BJU Int. 2005;95:120–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05262.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terrier J-É, Courtois F, Ruffion A, Morel Journel N. Surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction with suprapubic phalloplasty. J Sex Med. 2014;11:288–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Selvaggi G, Dhejne C, Landen M, Elander A. The 2011 WPATH standards of care and penile reconstruction in female-to-male transsexual individuals. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:581712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/581712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Garaffa G, Ralph DJ, Christopher N. Total urethral construction with the radial artery-based forearm free flap in the transsexual. BJU Int. 2010;106:1206–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09247.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Falcone M, Garaffa G, Gillo A, Dente D, Christopher AN, Ralph DJ. Outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in 247 patients completing female to male gender reassignment surgery. BJU Int. 2018;121:139–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogoras N. Uber die volle plastische wiederherstellung eines zum Koitus fahigen Penis (peniplastica totalis). Zentralbl Chir. 1936;22:1271–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison RJ. Congenital absence of the penis with embryological considerations. Br J Plast Surg. 1948;1:12–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hotchkiss RS, Morales PA, O’connor JJ. Plastic reconstructive surgery after total loss of the penis. Am J Surg. 1956;92:403–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Julian R, Klein MH, Hubbard H. Management of a thermal burn with amputation and reconstruction of the penis. J Urol. 1969;101:580–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan I, Wesser D. A rapid method for constructing a functional sensitive penis. Br J Plast Surg. 1971;24:342–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(71)80087-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orticochea M. A new method of total reconstruction of the penis. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25:347–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(72)80077-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McGregor IA, Jackson IT. The groin flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25:3–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Puckett CL, Montie JE. Construction of male genitalia in the transsexual, using a tubed groin flap for the penis and a hydraulic inflation device. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61:523–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Song R, Gao Y, Song Y, Yu Y, Song Y. The forearm flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9:21–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang TS, Hwang WY. Forearm flap in one-stage reconstruction of the penis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:251–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garaffa G, Christopher NA, Ralph DJ. Total phallic reconstruction in female-to-male transsexuals. Eur Urol. 2010;57:715–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Felici N, Felici A. A new phalloplasty technique: the free anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:153–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Arpa S, Claes K, Lumen N, Oieni S, Hoebeke P, Monstrey S. Urethral reconstruction in anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty: a 93-case experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:382e–392e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perovic SV, Djinovic R, Bumbasirevic M, Djordjevic M, Vukovic P. Total phalloplasty using a musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. BJU Int. 2007;100:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07084.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Djordjevic ML, Bencic M, Kojovic V, Stojanovic B, Bizic M, Kojic S, et al. Musculocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap for phalloplasty in female to male gender affirmation surgery. World J Urol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02641-w.

  23. Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML. Metoidioplasty: a variant of phalloplasty in female transsexuals. BJU Int. 2003;92:981–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilbert DA, Jordan GH, Devine CJ, Winslow BH. Microsurgical forearm “cricket bat-transformer” phalloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:711–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Crippen MM, Patel N, Filimonov A, Brady JS, Merchant A, Baredes S, et al. Association of smoking tobacco with complications in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1176.

  26. Monstrey S, Ceulemans P, Hoebeke P. Sex reassignment surgery in the female-to-male transsexual. Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25:229–44. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281493

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Caenegem E, Verhaeghe E, Taes Y, Wierckx K, Toye K, Goemaere S, et al. Long-term evaluation of donor-site morbidity after radial forearm flap phalloplasty for transsexual men. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1644–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Selvaggi G, Monstrey S, Hoebeke P, Ceulemans P, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M, et al. Donor-site morbidity of the radial forearm free flap after 125 phalloplasties in gender identity disorder. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1171–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000221110.43002.a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express a great appreciation to all physicians involved in this study for the great interest demonstrated towards this ambitious project and the accuracy demonstrated in collecting data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Falcone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authoes declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falcone, M., Timpano, M., Oderda, M. et al. Suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty in transgender men: a multicentric retrospective cohort analysis. Int J Impot Res 33, 808–814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0238-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0238-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links