Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The dark side of the internet regarding sexual education

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. I.T.U, Measuring digital development, Facts and figures 2019. 2019. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/factsFigures.

  2. I.T.U., ICT Facts and Figures 2017. 2017. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2017.pdf.

  3. UNESCO & United Nations Population Fund. Switched on: sexuality education in the digital space. International Symposium: Istanbul, Turkey, 2020.

  4. Buhi ER, Dalley EM, Fuhrmann HJ, Smith SA. An observational study of how young people search for online sexual health information. J Am Coll Health. 2009;58:101–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kendall N. The Sex Education Debates. Chicago: University of Chicago; 2012.

  6. New Zealand advert featuring nude ‘porn actors’ praised for promoting internet safety. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/newzealand-porn-advert-nude-keep-it-real-online-campaign-a9566311.html. 2020.

  7. Racey M, Machmueller D, Field D, Kulak V, Newton GS. Perceptions and use of sources of health knowledge by young adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2018;30:20160002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quadara A, El-Murr A, Latham J, The effects of pornography on children and young people: An evidence scan. Australian Institute of Family Studies: Melbourne; 2017.

  9. Berger JH, Kehoe JE, Doan AP, Crain DS, Klam WP, Marshall MT, et al. Survey of sexual function and pornography. Mil Med. 2019;184:731–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boies SC. University students’ uses of and reactions to online sexual information and entertainment: links to online and offline sexual behaviour. Can J Hum Sexuality. 2002;11:77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Döring N, Daneback K, Shaughnessy K, Grov C, Byers ES. Online sexual activity experiences among college students: a four-country comparison. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:1641–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pornhub. 2020. The 2019 Year in Review – Pornhub Insights, https://www.pornhub.com/insights/2019-year-in-review, accessed January 2020.

  13. Silver L, Smith A, Johnson C, Jiang J, Anderson M, Rainie L. Mobile connectivity in emerging economies, Pew Research Center. 2019. www.pewinternet.org/2019/03/07/mobileconnectivity-in-emerging-economies.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Gul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altintas, E., Gul, M. The dark side of the internet regarding sexual education. Int J Impot Res 34, 235–236 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00398-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00398-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links