Achieving a thriving sexual medicine practice with a high volume of penile implants is both challenging and rewarding for the prosthetic surgeon. It is not an easy feat to accomplish. Techniques of practice building from physician referrals and marketing to the patient have changed remarkably in the era of social media. Peer-to-peer continues to be a critical source of physician referrals, but methods of “getting the word out” to patients have drastically altered. Internal marketing to one’s own patients and external passing of information to prospective clients requires a robust presence on the internet. This workshop will focus on the achievement of high-volume implant practices in the age of the World Wide Web. Despite accomplishing this triumph through use of digital media, it is important to continue personal attainments to maintain your ethical image amongst your physician peers and the general public.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Oberlin DT, Matulewicz RS, Bachrach L, Hofer MD, Brannigan RE, Flury SC. National practice patterns of treatment of erectile dysfunction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Urol. 2015;193:2040–44.
Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, Brant W, Kohler T, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518.
Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. II: long-term results with hydroflex and dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multi-component inflatables. J Urol. 1996;155:1621.
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Surarez GM, Personal A. Approach to the management of the complications of penile implant surgery. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1995;24:770.
Wilson SK, Delk JR II. A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease—modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121.
Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR II. Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity)". J Urol. 1996;155:135.
Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Comparison of mechanical reliability of original and enhanced mentor alpha I penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1999;162:715–8.
Wilson SK, Wahman GE, Lange JL. Eleven years’ experience with inflatable penile prostheses. J Urol. 1988;139:951.
Wilson SK, Delk JR II. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol. 1995;153:65.
Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with preoperative elevated glycosylated hemoglobin levels. J Urol. 1997;157:362.
Wilson SK, Henry GD, Delk JR, Cleves MA. Mentor alpha 1 penile prosthesis with reservoir lock-out valve: effective prevention of auto-inflation with improved capability for ectopic reservoir placement. J Urol. 2002;168:1475.
Wilson SK, Henry GD, Siegel A, Delk JR. New surgical technique for implantation of AMS 800 urinary control system utilizing transverse scrotal incision. J Urol. 2003;169:261.
Conflict of interest
BC—Consultant: Boston Scientific. TK—Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast. SKW—Consultant: AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices, Uramix; Lecturer Boston Scientific; and Stockholder NeoTract. LW declares no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, L., Christine, B., Köhler, T. et al. Implant practice building: tenets to growing a successful and rewarding practice. Int J Impot Res 35, 419–427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00384-6