Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Evolution of techniques for aesthetic penile enlargement during prosthesis placement: a chronicle of the Egydio non-grafting strategy

Abstract

Since penile prostheses only provide axial rigidity, correction of penile deformity and enlargement of the visible penis during implant surgery may be desired. Evolving techniques of tunica expansion have made it possible to avoid grafting and preservation of the cylindrical appearance without bulges and indentations. After two decades of devising individualized solutions for patients and continuous enhancements of existing surgical solutions, Dr. Paulo Egydio has arrived at his Tunica Expansion Procedure (TEP). This strategy is his newest iteration of a lengthening techniques without grafting accompanied by penile prosthesis implantation. The TEP Strategy permits surgeons to use their own intuitive reasoning to determine the best pattern of multiple, small, staggered incisions to promote length and girth enlargement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Evolution of expansion.
Fig. 2: Paulo is a dedicated oenophile.
Fig. 3: The Egydio TEP strategy.
Fig. 4: Scars and calcifications do not need to be removed with the TEP.
Fig. 5: Intraoperative TEP.
Fig. 6: TEP length gain.
Fig. 7: Stabilization of cylinders.
Fig. 8: Avoidance of cross meshing.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carvalheira A, Santana R, Pereira NM. Why are men satisfied or dissatisfied with penile implants? A mixed method study on satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2474–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vasconcelos JS, Figueiredo RT, Nascimento FL, Damião R, da Silva EA. The natural history of penile length after radical prostatectomy: a long-term prospective study. Urology. 2012;80:1293–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park KK, Lee SH, Chung BH. The effects of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on penile length in patients with prostate cancer: a single-center, prospective, open-label, observational study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3214–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Otero JR, Cruz CR, Gómez BG, Geli JS, Polo JM, Castañé ER, et al. Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: A single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kueronya V, Miernik A, Stupar S, Kojovic V, Hatzichristodoulou G, Egydio PH, et al. International multicentre psychometric evaluation of patient-reported outcome data for the treatment of Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int. 2015;115:822–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egydio PH. Correção da deformidade peniana na doença de Peyronie’s com incisão circunferencial incompleta em duplo Y na placa e enxerto de pericárdio bovino. Doctoral dissertation, Publication Nº USP/FM/SBD-257/00. São Paulo, Brazil: University of São Paulo Medical School; 2000.

  8. Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S. Treatment of Peyronie’s disease by incomplete circumferential incision of the tunica albuginea and plaque with bovine pericardium graft. Urology. 2002;59:570–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Egydio PH, Lucon AM, Arap S. A single relaxing incision to correct different types of penile curvature: surgical technique based on geometrical principles. BJU Int. 2004;94:1147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Egydio PH. Surgical Straightening With Tunica Incision and Grafting Technique. In: Levine Laurence A (ed). Peyronie’s disease: a guide to clinical management. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.; 2007. p. 227–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Egydio PH, Deformidade Peniana Adquirida (Doença de Peyronie). Joaquim José Gama-Rodrigues, Marcel Cerqueira Cesar Machado, Samir Rasslan (ed). Clínica Cirúrgica - Medicina USP. Barueri, SP, Brasil: Editora Manole Ltda.; 2008. pp. 1323–9.

  12. Egydio PH, Austoni E. Geometric plaque surgery. In: Austoni E (ed). Atlas of reconstructive penile surgery. Pisa, Italy: Pacini Editore SpA; 2010. pp. 309–21.

  13. Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Pecoraro S, Silvani M, Barbagli G, et al. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease with Egydio’s technique: a European multicentre study. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:842–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Konstantinidis K, Kuehhas F, Papatsoris A. The Egydio geometrical procedure for managing penile curvature using a single relaxing incision: A single-centre experience with 330 patients. Arab J Urol. 2015;13:287–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. American Urological Association. Survivor Debate: IPP with degloving preferred treatment in difficult case of penile shortening, deformity, media release. 2019. https://www.auadailynews.org/survivor-debate-ipp-with-degloving-preferred-treatment-in-difficult-case-of-penile-shortening-deformity/. Accessed 12 Aug 2020.

  16. American Urological Association. Best Poster Winners - PDF. 2020. https://www.auavirtual.org/2020%20Virtual%20Science%20-%20Best%20Poster%20Winners%20-%20PDF.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2020.

  17. Egydio PH, MP39: Sexual function/dysfunction: surgical therapy II, MP39-04: an innovative strategy for non-grafting penile enlargement: The Egydio paradigm for tunica expansion procedures (TEP), moderated poster AUA 2020. https://www.eventscribe.com/2020/AUA2020/fsPopup.asp?Mode=presInfo&PresentationID=722225.

  18. Egydio PH. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease: choosing the best approach to improve patient satisfaction. Asian J Androl. 2008;10:158–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Egydio PH, Perovic SV, Sansalone S. Surgical Treatment of severe Peyronie’s Disease for maximum penile length and girth gain. J Urol. 2008;179:256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Egydio P, Vespasiani G, Miano R, et al. Simultaneous penile lengthening and penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie’s disease, refractory erectile dysfunction, and severe penile shortening. J Sex Med. 2012;9:316–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Sansalone S. Penile length and girth restoration in severe Peyronie’s disease using circular and longitudinal grafting. BJU Int. 2013;111(4 Pt B):E213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Djordjevic ML, Kojovic V. Penile prosthesis implantation and tunica albuginea incision without grafting in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease with erectile dysfunction. Asian J Androl. 2013;15:391–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Destefanis P, Galletto E, et al. A new, innovative, lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie’s disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal-ventral patch graft: the “sliding technique”. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2389–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rolle L, Falcone M, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Ralph DJ, et al. prospective multicentric international study on the surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction rates of the ‘sliding’ technique for end-stage Peyronie’s disease with severe shortening of the penis and erectile dysfunction. BJU Int. 2016;117:814–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified ‘sliding’ technique. BJU Int. 2015;116:965–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE, Valenzuela RJ. Modified sliding technique (MoST) for penile lengthening with insertion of inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2015;12:1100–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson SK, Mora-Estaves C, Egydio P, Ralph D, Habous M, Love C, et al. Glans necrosis following penile prosthesis implantation: prevention and treatment suggestions. Urology. 2017;107:144–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Egydio PH, Kuehhas FE. The multiple-slit technique (MUST) for penile length and girth restoration. J Sex Med. 2018;15:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaffney CD, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, Small AC, Kuehhas FE, Egydio PH, et al. Lengthening strategies for Peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:351–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Egydio PH. Enlargement of length and girth associated with implantation of penile prostheses. Implante de prótesis con reconstrucción y agrandamiento de pene en el mismo acto quirúrgico. Actas Urol Esp. 2020;44:333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Egydio PH. A tunica expansion procedure (TEP): an innovative non-grafting proposal for penile enlargement (the Egydio TEP strategy). In: Russo G, Cocci A (eds). Peyronie’s disease: pathophysiology and treatment. Academic Press: Elsevier Inc.; 2020. pp. 199–218.

  32. Egydio PH. An innovative strategy for non-grafting penile enlargement: a novel paradigm for tunica expansion procedures. J Sex Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.010.

  33. Vandeput JJ, Tanner JC, Boswick J. Implementation of parameters in the expansion ratio of mesh skin grafts. Plast Reconstructive Surg. 1997;100:653–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Henderson J, Arya R, Gillespie P. Skin graft meshing, over-meshing, and cross-meshing. Int J Surg. 2012;10:547–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Egydio PH, Taylor J, Taylor G, Goldstein I. PD25-01 engineering buckling force study for supporting that cylinder constriction and rear tip extender are associated with reduced axial rigidity – the implications on clinical practice. J Urol. 2017;197(4S):E502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology. 2012;79:1310–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weinberg AC, Pagano MJ, Deibert CM, Valenzuela RJ. Sub-coronal inflatable penile prosthesis placement with modified no-touch technique: a step-by-step approach with outcomes. J Sex Med. 2016;13:270–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moncada I, Martínez-Salamanca JI, Jara J, Cabello R, Moralejo M, Hernández C. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporeal dilation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique. J Urol. 2010;183:1123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, Deibert CM, Hernandez K, Alukal J, Zhao L, et al. Penile intracavernosal pillars: lessons from anatomy and potential implications for penile prosthesis placement. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:114–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49:822–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Althof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, Levine F, Burnett AL, McVary K, et al. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1999;53:793–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Broughton G, Janis JE, Attinger CE. The basic science of wound healing. Plast Reconst Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):12S–34S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Janis JE, Harrison B. Wound healing: part I. Basic science. Plast Reconst Surg. 2014;133:199e–207e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wilson SK, Levine L, Wang R. “Make it as long as you can, Doc.” Concomitant surgical treatments with penile implant to enhance penile size. Int J Impot Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0306-9.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Steven K. Wilson, Lexiaochuan Wen or Paulo H. Egydio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SKW: Consultant for AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices. Lecturer for Boston Scientific. Stockholder NeoTract. LW: None. PHE: None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, S.K., Wen, L. & Egydio, P.H. Evolution of techniques for aesthetic penile enlargement during prosthesis placement: a chronicle of the Egydio non-grafting strategy. Int J Impot Res 35, 1–8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00379-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00379-3

Search

Quick links