Abstract
The medical approach to children who may have been sexually abused involves several issues and aspects that need to be considered. The medical examination of children with suspected sexual abuse is important, but a detailed medical history from the child and the parents or caretakers is always part of every thorough examination. It can take a long time until victims disclose their abuse and physical signs of abuse may no longer be visible at the time of examination. If the physical examination is performed non-acutely, only 2.2% of sexually abused girls show diagnostic signs of injury. An experienced examiner should ideally perform the examination in suspected sexual abuse of children. Knowledge of the current literature is of importance, as the interpretation of findings has changed over the past decades and it can be difficult to differentiate between normal variants, symptoms of other medical problems, and signs of sexual assault. Furthermore, sexual abuse of children presents in various form, not necessarily leading to physical injuries. Since 1992, Adams et al. publish a regularly updated system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse, including a detailed list of physical findings and infections related to sexual abuse. The purpose of this article is to summarize important aspects of the medical approach to children with suspected sexual abuse according to the current literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matkins PP, Jordan KS. Pediatric sexual abuse. Emergency department evaluation and management. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2009;31(No. 2):140–52.
Gallion HR, Milam LJ, Littrel LL. Genital findings in cases of child sexual abuse: genital vs. vaginal penetration. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:604.
Kogan SM. Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abus Negl. 2004;28:147–65.
Smith DW, Letourneau EJ, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG, Resnick HS, Best CL. Delay in disclosure of childhood rape: results from a national survey. Child Abus Negl. 2000;24:273–87.
Jenny C, Crawford-Jakubiak JE. Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics: the evaluation of children in the primary care setting when sexual abuse is suspected. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e558.
Finkel MA, Alexander RA. Conducting the medical history. J Child Sex Abus. 2011;20:486.
Melville JD, Kellogg ND, Perez N, Lukegahr JLL. Assessment for self-blame and trauma symptoms during the medical evaluation of suspected sexual abuse. Child Abus Negl. 2014;38:851.
Adams JA. Medical evaluation of suspected child sexual abuse: 2011 update. J Child Sex Abus. 2011;20:588–605.
DeLago C, Deblinger E, Schroeder C, Finkel M. Girls who disclose sexual abuse: urogenital symptoms and signs after genital contact. Pediatrics. 2008;122:281–6.
World Health Organisation. WHO | Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence [https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/med_leg_guidelines/en/t]
Berkoff MC, Zolotor AJ, Makoroff KL, Thackeray JD, Shapiro RA, Runyan DK. Has this prepubertal girl been sexually abused? JAMA. 2008;300:2779–92
Adams JA, Harper K, Knudson S. A proposed system for the classification of anogenital findings in children with suspected sexual abuse. Adolesc Pediatr Gynecol. 1992;5:73–75.
Adams JA, Farst KJ, Kellog ND. Interpretation of medical findings in suspected child sexual abuse: an update for 2018. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018;31:225e231.
Killough E, Spector L, Moffatt M, Wiebe J, Nielsen-Parker L, Anderst J. Diagnostic agreement when comparing still and video imaging for the evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Abus Negl. 2016;52:102.
Kellogg N. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect: the evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics. 2005;116:506–12.
The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Guidelines on paediatricforensic examinations in relation to possible child sexual abuse. October 2012, Review Date October 2015. https://fflm.ac.uk.
Thackeray JD, Hornor G, Benzinger EA, Scribano PV. Forensic evidence collection and DNA identification in acute child sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011;128:227.
Girardet R, Bolton K, Lahoti S, Mowbray H, Giardino A, Isaac R, et al. Collection of forensic evidence from pediatric victims of sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2011;128:233.
Christian CW. Timing of the medical examination. J Child. Sex Abus. 2011;20:505.
US Department of Justice. A national protocol for sexual assault medical forensic examinations adults/adolescents. Washington, DC: Office on Violence Against Women; 2013.
Adams JA, Kellogg ND, Farst KJ, Harper NS, Palusci VJ, Frasier LD, et al. Updated guidelines for the medical assessment and care of children who may have been sexually abused. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:81.
Danaher F, Vandeven A, Blanchard A, Newton AW. Recognizing, diagnosing, and preventing child maltreatment: an update for pediatric clinics. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2018;30:582–90.
Black CM, Driebe EM, Howard LA, Fajman NN, Sawyer MK, Girardet RG, et al. Multicenter study of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in children being evaluated for sexual abuse. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28:608.
Leder MR, Leber AL, Marcon MJ, Scribano PV. Use of Aptima Combo 2: the experience of a child advocacy center. J Child Sex Abus. 2013;22:297.
Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/default.htm; 2015
Kellogg ND, Melville JD, Lukefahr JL, Nienow SM, Russel EL. Genital and extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia in children and adolescents evaluated for sexual abuse. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34:761–6.
Hobbs MM, Sena AC. Modern diagnosis of Trichomonas vaginalis infection. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:434.
Van Der Pol B. Clinical and laboratory testing for Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:7.
Zichichi L, Maniascalco M. The challenges of a neglected STI: Molluscum contagiosum. G Ital Dermatol Venerol. 2012;147:447.
Bacopoulou F, Karakitsos P, Kottaridi C, Stefanaki C, Deligeoroglou E, Theodoridou K, et al. Genital HPV in children and adolescents: does sexual activity make a difference? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016;29:22.
Practice Bulletin Summary No. 152: Emergency Contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:685–6
Havens PL. Committee on Pediatric AIDS: postexposure prophylaxis in children and adolescents for nonoccupational exposure to human immunodeficiency virus. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1475–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hiess, M. Medical approach to children who may have been sexually abused—a narrative review. Int J Impot Res 33, 210–216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00353-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00353-z
This article is cited by
-
Out of the dark, into the light: sexuality and fertility in pediatric urological conditions
International Journal of Impotence Research (2021)