In a special miniseries highlighting the different surgical techniques to the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP), Wilson’s Workshop seeks to bring forth skill considerations for the modern implanter. Each work is authored by a highly regarded surgeon who has truly honed the art of their respective approach. Today, most implanters are comfortable with either the penoscrotal or suprapubic incision. The following work directs the spotlight onto a much newer and less known technique, IPP implant via the subcoronal incision. SHP leads the Urology Center of Excellence in Seoul, South Korea, and has implanted more than 700 IPPs using the subcoronal approach since 2015. Here, he will share the clinical pearls of this novel incision gathered through trial and error over many repetitions. We are hopeful that this work will peak the interest of inquisitive minds and help disseminate improved implant techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $14.88 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Smith AD. Circumcision incision for insertion of semirigid penile prosthesis. Urology. 1981;18:609.
Egydio PH. Surgical straightening with tunica incision and grafting technique. In: Levine LA, editor. Peyronie’S disease: a guide to clinical management. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2007. p. 227–39.
Weinberg AC, Pagano MJ, Deibert CM, Valenzuela RJ. Sub-coronal inflatable penile prosthesis placement with modified no-touch technique: a step-by-step approach with outcomes. J Sex Med. 2016;13:270–6.
Park SH. How to perform revision IPP under local anesthesia. VJPU. 2018;2:129
Valenzuela R. IPP insertion and vasectomy using a single subcoronal incision. VJPU. 2015;2:46
Park SH, Mora C, Wilson SK. Everything you ever wanted to know about IPP via subcoronal incision. VJPU. 2020;4:169
Otero JR, Manfredi C, Wilson SK. The good, the bad, and the ugly about surgical approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Int J Impot Res. 2020:1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-0319-4.
Wilson SK, Mora-Estaves C, Egydio P, Ralph D, Habous M, Love C, et al. Glans necrosis following penile prosthesis implantation: prevention and treatment suggestions. Urology. 2017;107:144–8.
Park SH. Subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis under local anesthesia. J Vis Surg. 2019;5:65.
Conflict of interest
SHP: Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast; LW: none; JM: Consultant: Boston Scientific, Coloplast; SKW: Consultant: AMT, Coloplast, International Medical Devices. Lecturer: Boston Scientific. Stockholder: NeoTract.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S.H., Wen, L., Mulcahy, J. et al. Nuances of subcoronal inflatable penile prosthesis for physicians accustomed to penoscrotal approach. Int J Impot Res (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00349-9