Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Consulting “Dr Google” for sexual dysfunction: a contemporary worldwide trend analysis

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 32, pages 455–461 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Google Trends (GT) is a free, easily accessible search tool which can be used to analyze worldwide “big data” on the relative popularity of search terms over a specific period of time. To determine worldwide public interest in Peyronie’ disease (PD), erectile dysfunction (ED), premature ejaculation (PE) treatments, their penetrance, variation, and how they compare over time. Worldwide search-engine trends analysis included electronic Google queries from people who searched PD, ED, and PE treatments options from January 2004 to October 2018, worldwide. Join-point regression (JPR) has been performed. Comparison annual relative search volume (ARSV), average annual percentage change (AAPC) and temporal patterns were analyzed to assess loss or gain of interest. Our results showed that for PD it has been a decreased interest for Drug (AAPC: −3.1%, p < 0.01), ESWT (AAPC: −3.1%, p < 0.01), and vacuum therapy (AAPC: −1.2%, p < 0.01). In the field of ED, we observed trends toward an increased interest in prosthetic surgical treatment (AAPC: +1.7%, p = 0.4), for prostaglandins (AAPC: +0.7%, p = 0.7), for traction (AAPC: +0.6%, p = 0.1) and for ESWT (AAPC: +1.8%, p = 0.4), but without statistical significance. On the contrary, we observed a slight reduction of search for Vacuum device (AAPC: −1 %, p < 0.01). The interest in PE decreased from 2004 to today (AAPC: −1%, p < 0.01), for surgical treatment (AAPC: −3.1%, p < 0.01), drug treatment (AAPC: −3.1%, p < 0.01), and for psychotherapy (AAPC: −6.7%, p < 0.01). On the contrary, the interest in spray drugs has increased significantly (AAPC: +5.1%, p < 0.01). Patients are searching the web for sexual diseases treatment options. Understanding people inquisitiveness together with degree of knowledge could be supportive to guide counseling in the decision-making-process and put effort in certifying patient information, avoiding them to fall in the pernicious trap of ‘fake-news’.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nuti SV, Wayda B, Ranasinghe I, Wang S, Dreyer RP, Chen SI, et al. The use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e109583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gualtieri LN. The doctor as the second opinion and the internet as the first. CHI 2009, Boston, MA, USA ACM.

  3. Hui J, He S, Liu R, Zeng Q, Zhang H, Wei A. Trends in erectile dysfunction research from 2008 to 2018: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0161-8. [Epub ahead of print].

  4. Aggarwal A, Lewis D, Mason M, Purushotham A, Sullivan R, van der Meulen J. Effect of patient choice and hospital competition on service configuration and technology adoption within cancer surgery: a national, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1445–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stevenson FA, Kerr C, Murray E, Nazareth I. Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective–a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2007;8:47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaminetsky J, Gittelman M, Kaufman GJ, Smith TM, Jordan GH Patient perspectives on Peyronie’s disease: results of poststudy interviews from a phase 2 trial of collagenase clostridium histolyticum. Int J Impot Res. 2019;201:649.

  7. Bole R, Ziegelmann M, Avant R, Montgomery B, Kohler T, Trost L. Patient’s choice of health information and treatment modality for Peyronie’s disease: a long-term assessment. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russo GI, Milenkovic U, Hellstrom W, Levine LA, Ralph D, Albersen M. Clinical efficacy of injection and mechanical therapy for Peyronie’s disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2018;74:767–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cocci A, Russo GI, Briganti A, Salonia A, Cacciamani G, Capece M, et al. Predictors of treatment success after collagenase Clostridium histolyticum injection for Peyronie’s disease: development of a nomogram from a multicentre single-arm, non-placebo controlled clinical study. BJU Int. 2018;122:680–687.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo GI, Cacciamani G, Cocci A, Kessler TM, Morgia G, Serefoglu EC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of intralesional therapy for peyronie’s disease in controlled clinical studies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Sex Med. 2019;16:289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis NF, Smyth LG, Flood HD. Detecting internet activity for erectile dysfunction using search engine query data in the Republic of Ireland. BJU Int. 2012;110:E939–E942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brownstein JS, Freifeld CC, Madoff LC. Digital disease detection–harnessing the Web for public health surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2153–2155, 2157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cervellin G, Comelli I, Lippi G. Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;7:185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi H, Varian H. Predicting the present with Google Trends. Economic Rec. 2012;88:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Google. Google Trends. www.google.com/trends. 2019.

  16. Clegg LX, Hankey BF, Tiwari R, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK. Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. Stat Med. 2009;28:3670–3682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cacciamani GE, Bassi S, Sebben M, Marcer A, Russo GI, Cocci A, et al. Consulting “Dr. Google” for prostate cancer treatment options: a contemporary worldwide trend analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.002. [Epub ahead of print].

  18. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nimbi FM, Tripodi F, Rossi R, Michetti PM, Simonelli C. Which psychosocial variables affect drive the most? Analysis of sexual desire in a group of Italian men. Int J Impot Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-018-0105-8. [Epub ahead of print].

  20. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E, et al. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40-80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:39–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corona G, Mannucci E, Petrone L, Giommi R, Mansani R, Fei L, et al. Psycho-biological correlates of hypoactive sexual desire in patients with erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 2004;16:275–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Verze P, Arcaniolo D, Palmieri A, Cai T, La Rocca R, Franco M, et al. Premature ejaculation among italian men: prevalence and clinical correlates from an observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, epidemiological study (IPER). Sex Med. 2018;6:193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun AJ, Li S, Eisenberg ML. The impact of clostridium histolyticum collagenase on the prevalence and management of Peyronie’s disease in the United States. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:234–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jena AB, Karaca-Mandic P, Weaver L, Seabury SA. Predicting new diagnoses of HIV infection using internet search engine data. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1352–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lavorgna L, De Stefano M, Sparaco M, Moccia M, Abbadessa G, Montella P, et al. Fake news, influencers and health-related professional participation on the Web: a pilot study on a social-network of people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;25:175–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas J, Peterson GM, Walker E, Christenson JK, Cowley M, Kosari S, et al. Fake news: medicines misinformation by the media. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104:1059–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porst H, Burri A. Novel treatment for premature ejaculation in the light of currently used therapies: a review. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urology Section, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    Giorgio Ivan Russo, Marina di Mauro & Sebastiano Cimino

  2. Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Andrea Cocci

  3. The Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Giovanni Cacciamani

  4. Department of Urology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ege Can Serefoglu

  5. Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Maarten Albersen

  6. Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

    Paolo Capogrosso

  7. Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

    Mikkel Fode

  8. Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Paolo Verze

  9. Haga Hospital, Department of Urology, Den Haag, The Netherlands

    Melianthe P. J. Nicolai

  10. Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Georgios Hatzichristodoulou

Authors
  1. Giorgio Ivan Russo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina di Mauro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea Cocci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giovanni Cacciamani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sebastiano Cimino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ege Can Serefoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Maarten Albersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paolo Capogrosso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mikkel Fode
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Paolo Verze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

On behalf of EAU-YAU Men’s Health Working Group

  • Melianthe P. J. Nicolai
  •  & Georgios Hatzichristodoulou

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Ivan Russo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Russo, G.I., di Mauro, M., Cocci, A. et al. Consulting “Dr Google” for sexual dysfunction: a contemporary worldwide trend analysis. Int J Impot Res 32, 455–461 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0203-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0203-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links