Article | Published:

Penile dimensions: What are surgeons measuring?

International Journal of Impotence Research (2019) | Download Citation


Penile dimensions and related dissatisfaction, may have significant impact upon patients whom undergo andrological surgeries. Whilst penile dimension assessment is performed as part of the andrological evaluation, little is known regarding the surgeons’ opinions nor contemporary practices. This study was designed to gain further insights into the opinions and practices of clinicians regarding penile measurement and is the first paper in the literature of its kind. The study was performed by inviting clinicians at andrological/urological conferences to participate in a voluntary 10 point survey concerning penile dimensions. Of 126 responses recorded, 56% (71/126) were andrologists. Of the responders, 45% (56/122) did not routinely perform penile measurement prior to treatment nor were they aware of the standardised method (93/123). The majority 64%(81/126) would measure the penile length from the pubic bone to the tip (79/123) with the penis in a stretched position (99/125). A goniometer was the most common way of assessing penile curvature (37/73) and the length would be measured mostly on the convex side (46/119). Responders felt that, from the patients perspective, a combination of length, girth and shape (51/123), or length only (50/123), were the more important aspects of penile dimensions. As responders were recruited based on their interest in andrological aspects of urology, it may not be representative of the general urological community. In conclusion, attitudes and methods of penile measurement are quite varied amongst surgeons, thus further discussion and investigation of this aspect of andrological care ought to occur.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Nehra A, Alterowitz R, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, Heidelbaugh JJ, et al. Peyronie's Disease: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2015;194:745–53.

  2. 2.

    Chung E, Ralph D, Kagioglu A, Garaffa G, Shamsodini A, Bivalacqua T, et al. Evidence-based management guidelines on Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med. 2016;13:905–23.

  3. 3.

    Smith JF, Walsh TJ, Conti SL, Turek P, Lue T. Risk factors for emotional and relationship problems in Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med. 2008;5:2179–84.

  4. 4.

    Rosen R, Catania J, Lue T, Althof S, Henne J, Hellstrom W, et al. Impact of Peyronie's disease on sexual and psychosocial functioning: qualitative findings in patients and controls. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1977–84.

  5. 5.

    Gelbard MK, Dorey F, James K. The natural history of Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 1990;144:1376–9.

  6. 6.

    Bella AJ, Perelman MA, Brant WO, Lue TF. Peyronie's disease (CME). J Sex Med. 2007;4:1527–38.

  7. 7.

    Xie D, Nicholas M, Gheiler V, Perito D, Siano L, Kislinger I, et al. A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:529–33.

  8. 8.

    Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS. A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:1462–4.

  9. 9.

    Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, AlBuheissi S, Qazi H, Fraser M, et al. Penile fracture: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2016;96:315–29.

  10. 10.

    Haliloglu A, Baltaci S, Yaman O. Penile length changes in men treated with androgen suppression plus radiation therapy for local or locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol. 2007;177:128–30.

  11. 11.

    Yu C, Hequn C, Longfei L, Minfeng C, Zhi C, Feng Z, et al. Sexual function after partial penectomy: a prospectively study from China. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21862.

  12. 12.

    Greenfield JM, Lucas S, Levine LA. Factors affecting the loss of length associated with tunica albuginea plication for correction of penile curvature. J Urol. 2006;175:238–41.

  13. 13.

    Habous M, Muir G, Soliman T, Farag M, Williamson B, Binsaleh S, et al. Outcomes of variation in technique and variation in accuracy of measurement in penile length measurement. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:21–6.

  14. 14.

    Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. The development and validation of the Male Genital Self-Image Scale: results from a nationally representative probability sample of men in the United States. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1516–25.

  15. 15.

    Gaither TW, Allen IE, Osterberg EC, Alwal A, Harris CR, Breyer BN. Characterization of genital dissatisfaction in a national sample of U.S. Men. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46:2123–30.

  16. 16.

    Eisenman R. Penis size: Survey of female perceptions of sexual satisfaction. BMC Women’s Health. 2001;1:1.

  17. 17.

    Davoudzadeh EP, Davoudzadeh NP, Margolin E, Stahl PJ, Stember DS. Penile length: measurement technique and applications. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:261–71.

  18. 18.

    Francken AB, van de Wiel HB, van Driel MF, Weijmar Schultz WC. What importance do women attribute to the size of the penis? Eur Urol. 2002;42:426–31.

  19. 19.

    Shamloul R. Treatment of men complaining of short penis. Urology. 2005;65:1183–5.

  20. 20.

    Mondaini N, Ponchietti R, Gontero P, Muir GH, Natali A, Caldarera E, et al. Penile length is normal in most men seeking penile lengthening procedures. Int J Impot Res. 2002;14:283–6.

  21. 21.

    Brody S, Costa RM. Satisfaction (sexual, life, relationship, and mental health) is associated directly with penile-vaginal intercourse, but inversely with other sexual behavior frequencies. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1947–54.

  22. 22.

    Hussein AA, Alwaal A, Lue TF. All about Peyronie's disease. Asian J Urol. 2015;2:70–8.

  23. 23.

    Ralph DJ, al-Akraa M, Pryor JP. The Nesbit operation for Peyronie's disease: 16-year experience. J Urol. 1995;154:1362–3.

  24. 24.

    Adeniyi AA, Goorney SR, Pryor JP, Ralph DJ. The Lue procedure: an analysis of the outcome in Peyronie's disease. BJU Int. 2002;89:404–8.

  25. 25.

    Pryor JP, Fitzpatrick JM. A new approach to the correction of the penile deformity in Peyronie's disease. J Urol. 1979;122:622–3.

  26. 26.

    Savoca G, Trombetta C, Ciampalini S, De Stefani S, Buttazzi L, Belgrano E. Long-term results with Nesbit's procedure as treatment of Peyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:289–93.

  27. 27.

    Hatzimouratidis K, Eardley I, Giuliano F, Hatzichristou D, Moncada I, Salonia A, et al. EAU guidelines on penile curvature. Eur Urol. 2012;62:543–52.

  28. 28.

    Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:411–5.

  29. 29.

    Frey A, Sonksen J, Jakobsen H, Fode M. Prevalence and predicting factors for commonly neglected sexual side effects to radical prostatectomies: results from a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2318–26.

  30. 30.

    Frey AU, Sonksen J, Fode M. Neglected side effects after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Sex Med. 2014;11:374–85.

  31. 31.

    Salonia A, Adaikan G, Buvat J, Carrier S, El-Meliegy A, Hatzimouratidis K, et al. Sexual rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer-part 2: recommendations from the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015). J Sex Med. 2017;14:297–315.

  32. 32.

    Frey A, Pedersen C, Lindberg H, Bisbjerg R, Sonksen J, Fode M. Prevalence and predicting factors for commonly neglected sexual side effects to external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Sex Med. 2017;14:558–65.

  33. 33.

    Park KK, Lee SH, Chung BH. The effects of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on penile length in patients with prostate cancer: a single-center, prospective, open-label, observational study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3214–9.

  34. 34.

    Birrer RB, Robinson T, Rao S, Leber M. Self-mutilation: three cases and a review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 1993;11:27–31.

  35. 35.

    Lee PA, Mazur T, Danish R, Amrhein J, Blizzard RM, Money J, et al. Micropenis. I. Criteria, etiologies and classification. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1980;146:156–63.

  36. 36.

    Schover LR, von Eschenbach AC, Smith DB, Gonzalez J. Sexual rehabilitation of urologic cancer patients: a practical approach. CA Cancer J Clin. 1984;34:66–74.

  37. 37.

    Witty K, Branney P, Evans J, Bullen K, White A, Eardley I. The impact of surgical treatment for penile cancer—patients' perspectives. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:661–7.

  38. 38.

    Kaplan GW. Malpractice risks for urologists. Urology. 1998;51:183–5.

  39. 39.

    Authority NL. Annual report and accounts 2017/2018. United Kingdom: NHS Resolution; 2018.

  40. 40.

    Habous M, Muir G, Tealab A, Williamson B, Elkhouly M, Elhadek W, et al. Analysis of the interobserver variability in penile length assessment. J Sex Med. 2015;12:2031–5.

  41. 41.

    Wessells H, Lue TF, McAninch JW. Penile length in the flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation. J Urol. 1996;156:995–7.

  42. 42.

    Sengezer M, Ozturk S, Deveci M. Accurate method for determining functional penile length in Turkish young men. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48:381–5.

  43. 43.

    Promodu K, Shanmughadas KV, Bhat S, Nair KR. Penile length and circumference: an Indian study. Int J Impot Res. 2007;19:558–63.

  44. 44.

    Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J. Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men. BJU Int. 2015;115:978–86.

  45. 45.

    Chen J, Gefen A, Greenstein A, Matzkin H, Elad D. Predicting penile size during erection. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:328–33.

  46. 46.

    Aslan Y, Atan A, Omur Aydin A, Nalcacioglu V, Tuncel A, Kadioglu A. Penile length and somatometric parameters: a study in healthy young Turkish men. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:339–41.

  47. 47.

    Bacal V, Rumohr J, Sturm R, Lipshultz LI, Schumacher M, Grober ED. Correlation of degree of penile curvature between patient estimates and objective measures among men with Peyronie's disease. J Sex Med. 2009;6:862–5.

  48. 48.

    Brant WO, Bella AJ, Lue TF. 16-Dot procedure for penile curvature. J Sex Med. 2007;4:277–80.

  49. 49.

    Ohebshalom M, Mulhall J, Guhring P, Parker M. Measurement of penile curvature in Peyronie's disease patients: comparison of three methods. J Sex Med. 2007;4:199–203.

Download references

Author information


  1. University College London Hospitals, London, UK

    • Gideon A. Blecher
    • , Josip Vukina
    •  & David J. Ralph
  2. St Peter’s Andrology, London, UK

    • David J. Ralph


  1. Search for Gideon A. Blecher in:

  2. Search for Josip Vukina in:

  3. Search for David J. Ralph in:


GAB: 1, 2, 3, 4, JV: 1, 2, DJR: 3, 4.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gideon A. Blecher.

About this article

Publication history